Re: [Evolution] spam mail en virus
Erik Leupold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 01/12/03 at 18:12: Am Son, 2003-01-12 um 23.14 schrieb simran: You can setup some filters that run the emails via external programs that check for for spam and viruses. * I use spamc (from spamassassin) for spam filtering * Not sure what is out there for virus checking, but i remember having heard of a program called fprot simran. F-Prot is a DOS-Scanner of F-Secure and it's free IMHO. Maybe you can The Linux version is free for personal, non-commercial use. Not quite the same thing as free. CLAM is free, I believe. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 msg12816/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Built-in spam filtering?
Jim Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 01/02/03 at 19:07: Of course I did. It has about a 90% success rate and more than a 1% false positive rate and requires me to diligently keep up the rule base. Now, 90% success would be great, but 1% false is a killer. That means I'll see like five or ten falses a day, which means I'll be constantly going through the filtered mail, which defeats the purpose. I use the latest 2.43 version, and I get much better than 90%, and can't recall the last time I had a false positive. Perhaps your experiences were with earlier versions? Probably 99% of Evolution's users don't run their own servers and would I think that's an overstatement, altho I will agree to a large majority. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 msg12315/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Reply-To Question
Gregory Leblanc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 12/20/02 at 20:00: Doing this means that you have to have some way of replying -other- than hitting the 'reply' button, in case you want to just send mail to the original sender. Furthermore, the existing code to make 'reply-to-list' I would think that 90+% of the time, you want a public response to a public post, rather than a private reply (after all, it's a public mailing list). Why not play the odds? . - reply to all means original poster gets two copies. Why? It doesn't. I think you're missing out on some common use-cases. There are many mailing lists out there which do not require you to be a member of the list before posting. That is to say, reply-to-all only results in the sender getting two copies of the mail if they're not on the list. Removing the sender on 'reply-to-all' is a BAD idea. Usually, that is not correct. The original poster gets 2 copies - one direct to him from you; one from the list. Many's the time I've gotten 2 replies to my Evolution list posts. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 msg12120/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Outlook does not like .asc signature
Josep Monés i Teixidor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 12/14/02 at 21:15: BTW, are you sure there isn't any way to disable that behaviour (deleting attachments) in Outlook? It's seems a very agressive (not to say silly) thing to do! Yes, there is. My Outlook does not delete any attachments. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 Boom diddy diddy, Boom diddy do Queen msg11960/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Outlook does not like .asc signature
Jeffrey Stedfast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 12/14/02 at 18:07: On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 14:54, Ed Weinberg wrote: I've ceased sending signed messages to mailing lists because of all the complaints from Outlook users... it always amazes me that so many otherwise highly intelligent people insist on using broken tools :( Unfortunatley when one mail program is used by so many people, bugs become features. This week, we can't fight this. That means that we either need to use tools that that can inter-operate with those bugs or not participate on the Internet. I have to disagree. It is still far better to conform to the standards. Lets also remember that Outlook Express deletes *all* messages with *any* attachment, so the problem is not limited to pgp signatures. OE v6 perhaps; my v5 does not. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 Boom diddy diddy, Boom diddy do Queen msg11946/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] SPAM control : spamassassin vipul's razor
Philippe Chartier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 11/21/02 at 09:58: Hi, It's not totally related to the list topic, but I was wondering if anyone tried to use Vipul's Razor http://razor.sourceforge.net/ with Evolution 1.2. It was simpler than I thought to install. I already had Spamassassin installed and it's filter my mail through a Pipe through shell command filter. From what I've read, Spamassassin was supposed to detect Razor's presence and it seemed to work. The output was improved, with more spams detected. But the filtering became very slow (about 5-10 sec per message). Is there a way to Razor is always slow, because they always seem to have problems with thier servers. I just turn Razor off in SpamAssassin. It might miss some more spam, but I don't have 10 seconds processing time per message. :-) -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 msg11299/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] embedded URLs
Jeffrey Stedfast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 11/20/02 at 23:15: Sounds like a Mozilla configuration issue (or a gnome-url configuration issue?). Unfortunately I know nothing about mozilla commandline options so I can't help ya. I've seen this question before; it's a mozilla FAQ, I think. You're right; there's an option to be used somewhere on the command line to stop this. Dig around at mozilla.org. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 msg11300/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Collapsing all threads...
Larry Ewing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 11/20/02 at 22:04: It is trivial to download the archives and import them into a folder to Doubt that those huge mailing lists archives are trivial to download for the dialup users. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 msg11301/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Connector / Debian Sid - revisited
Irle Markus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 11 15, 02 at 06:20: No, not really. RC is open-source, isn't it? But that nit-picking is again completely missing my point. Why am I forced into RC to _download_ a package? Because Ximian wants you to. I realize that sounds flippant, but its the truth. Why doesn't Ximian put it up on their site just like they do with Evo and RC? Possible because Connector is non-GPLed and proprietary? No idea, really. This is not about RC as piece of software. It's about RC being the only means of obtaining connector thus forcing people who want to use connector to use RC as well and simultaneously excluding lots of people for whom RC simply does not work. Evo+Conn was running fine on the Sid-boxes I set it up on. Now with the 1.2 update I'm back in hell again. As a bonus RC stopped to work on the Suse 8.0 boxes I used to download the previous connector version... I'm currently running Outlook within VMWare... *sigh* Yeah, I was never happy with RC. So now I only use the packages in Debian unstable. I don't use RC, but I can sympathize that Ximian's practice is aggravating. However, there haven't seemed to be any posts detailing why RC is a requirement, nor many asking for that policy to be changed. You may be out of luck, as far as non-RC use is concerned. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 msg11009/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.2 on Debian
Brian Rectanus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 11 12, 02 at 20:03: Sorry to ask a silly question, but it does not look like Evolution 1.2 and Connector 1.2 are available on debian. I don't see any mention of if it will be or when it will be (not in the news,FAQ, knowledge base or list archives). Maybe I am just blind, if so, sorry. Debian packages are *never* available the day some new version comes out. And a good thing, too - apparently, they give it a shakeout period. Make sure that there are no show stopper bugs or anything. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF Member, LEAF Project http://leaf.sourceforge.netAIM: MikeLeone Public Key - http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc Registered Linux user# 201348 msg10838/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] using spamassassin with evolution
That there's need for such a utility is obvious. At $US 30 per seat for Outlook and a shameful Deersoft (the commercial Windows Spamassassin Last I looked (few months back), Exchange licenses cost $63 US each. If you really needed it for an organization, you could setup a mail server with postfix or sendmail, to filter out the spam, and then just relay it to an internal Exchange server. Cost is minimal (use some leftover hardware). I'm thinking of doing just that with my Exchange server at work. msg10253/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.1.0.9
* Lloyd D Budd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 10, 02 at 20:54: On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 03:08, Hans Scheffers wrote: Hi I am using the development snapshot. Since a few days I cannot get to my settings anymore. Is there another way I can add / change / delete accounts? I also cannot use my signatures anymore... Can I change the default signature anymore? I am not a evo developer. I do find it strange when seeing msgs from ppl using devel snapshots requesting help in such a way that would likely distract developers from developing. If you can't drive, have not given your best effort to learn to drive, and you are not looking for assistance on driving, don't try driving. How do you know that Hans has not given it his best effort? Depending on the development model, these sort of messages against the bleeding edge are excellent, but not likely in the context of evo. I might even suggest that such a posting is off topic. Oh, surely not. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] other platforms?
- Original Message - From: Kevin Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 1:05 PM Subject: RE: [Evolution] other platforms? I too would like to see the demise of most all MS applications from my machine. One thing Outlook has that evo does not at the moment is SPA authentication. I have one email source that requires it. I know that Isn't Exchange the *only* mail server that requires this? And Outlook the only client? ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] RE: Two questions about evolution
Mostly fixed because we had to lose some functionality to get it to Such as? all work. :-/ But the end result is that we are now more interoperable with Outlook than Outlook itself is. :) That should be fun! :-) ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] TLS Evolution
- Original Message - From: Rodolfo Pilas [EMAIL PROTECTED] El mar, 05-03-2002 a las 16:04, Jeffrey Stedfast escribió: It should just work. Is there something in particular you want to know? Yes, I wish to know how to import the client certificate (*.p12) in Evolution like I import it in the Netscape Mailer (Security section) No need. Just tell Evo to use SSL in the SMTP section of your mail account setup. Evo does not exchange certificates with postfix; it accepts the server certificate. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] not wrapping incoming messages
- Original Message - From: Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Eric Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:09 PM Subject: Re: [Evolution] not wrapping incoming messages On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 15:02, Eric Newman wrote: How can I configure evo to _not_ wrap incoming messages? I get a lot of emails that are wide ascii tables that I need to see in their entirety, but evo mangles them. Any ideas? You can't. File a bug at bugzilla.ximian.com This *might* work as a work-around hit REPLY. Hilight the table, and change from NORMAL to PRE-FORMAT. You should be able to scroll back and forth horizontally, and see the whole table, presuming that it's not *too* wide. Otherwise, save the email, and use an editor to rewrap the lines as you want them. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Evo pilot conduits problems
It looks like mandrake is not packaging the conduits, atleast not in the evolution package. But I'm not using Mandrake's packaging of Evolution. [turgon@minas-aran turgon]$ rpm -qa | grep evolution evolution-1.0.2-3.ximian.2 [turgon@minas-aran turgon]$ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Message Priorities
- Original Message - From: Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steven R. Ringwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [Evolution] Message Priorities On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 17:44, Steven R. Ringwald wrote: Is there any way to get Evolution to display messages of different priority in a different color?? I have some messages that have the following in their headers: X-Priority: 1 Priority: Urgent Importance: high Set up a filter rule: criterion: [Specific Header] Importance [is] high action: [Set Status] Important Or Assign Color. That's what I do - lets me specify the color I want; different colors for different types of emails. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Re: GPG signatures
The workaround to this problem with inline signatures is to make the message and the signature separate MIME parts and specify that their contents are opaque. But then it is up to the mail client to recognize the Content-type: multipart/signed and the Content-disposition: inline MIME headers so it gets displayed as something other than a couple of attachments, yet still can be verified as a signed message. And that's where somebody gets to write and submit a patch for Evolution. How is that a patch for Evolution .. to make the OTHER client see the message as something more than 2 sttachments (which is how Outlook Express sees GPG signed stuff)? Wouldn't the Evo patch make Evo NOT send as Content-type: multipart/signed and the Content-disposition: inline MIME headers? Which would then not render it opaque? I'm confused. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] How do I tell Evolution what browser to use
You have to select the browser in the gnome control center. I use Opera and it works. Control Center - Document Handlers - URL Handlers And choose what - text/html? Doesn't work for me; mozilla still comes up, instead of galeon. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Header version incorrect?
- Original Message - From: Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Evolution Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:32 AM Subject: Re: [Evolution] Header version incorrect? On Mon, 2001-12-24 at 00:21, Michael Leone wrote: I use Evolution 1.02 (the Mandrake Cooker release, dated Dec 13) There is no such thing as Evolution 1.02. I suspect you mean evolution-1.0mdk2 or something. (Meaning the second Mandrake package.) The package name is evolution-1.0-2mdk. X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) This is definitely a post-1.0 release. Again, it's *not* post-1.0. The fact that it says Preview Release is a known bug that's fixed in 1.0.1. So my version isn't just a Mandrake version of the post 1.0 release snapshots? My apologies, then. Thanks for fixing that. I notice that there hasn't been new snapshots in a while; does that mean you're close to a 1.0.1 release? ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Outlook and signed messages
have you tried to add a Content-Disposition: inline to the GPG-signed messages ? Perhaps Outlook will follow the hint and display the attachment inline. Well, with the feature-freeze in place, it wouldn't be available for 1.0, since this is - technically, anyway - not a bug (i.e., an error in the way Evo works), but a feature change to accomodate OE. Altho I second the idea. :-) ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] RH 7.1 snapshots?
We're not pushing snapshots ATM, even if they build. Hopefully the issues preventing the push will be resolved today or tomorrow. Luis Ah. OK. Well, I did install the 2 updated files - libgal13. On Wed, 2001-10-03 at 08:15, Michael Leone wrote: Hi. The web page says that the snapshots for Red Hat 7.1 were built, but the evolution.rpm in the ftp directory is still the 2001.09.30 snapshot. Some of the other files (libgal13, etc) *do* have a later date. What's going on? Wasn't the main evo .rpm rebuilt? -- -- Michael J. Leone Registered Linux user #201348 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ: 50453890 AIM: MikeLeone PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF PGP public key: http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.gpg Taking a mental stroll through the psychic park of pleasure. -- Luis Villa Ximian Bugmaster Quality is an amazing bridge because it is universal in its language. Thomas Corcoran ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] How to use latest snapshots on Mandrake 8.1
Cool. Thanks for the info. I'll give it a try tonight. - Original Message - From: Ujwal S. Sathyam To: Mike Leone Cc: Evolution Mailing List Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:00 PM Subject: Re: [Evolution] How to use latest snapshots on Mandrake 8.1 RH 7.1 RPMs will work fine.UjwalOn Mon, 2001-10-01 at 07:15, Mike Leone wrote: Hi. I upgraded from Mandrake 7.2 to Mandrake 8.1 over the weekend. While I realize there's no Red carpet channel yet, since Mdk 8.1 was only released last week, I'd like to continue using the latest Evo snapshots. Will the RedHat 7.1 snaps work on Mdk 8.1? Anyone doing this? Any prequistes I'd need, to go from the Evo 0.13 that comes with Mdk 8.1, to the latest snapshots? With RC not working, I'd have to manually FTP them off Ximian's site. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
