Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 15:29, Thomas J. Baker wrote: Is ldaps supposed to work? I'm working on setting up an ldap server on a stock Red Hat 8.0 system and have it running with ldap. I now want to swtich to ldaps but the slapd server reports the following error when Evo 1.2.1 tries to connect: connection_get(10) connection_get(10): got connid=1 connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1 TLS trace: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv2/v3 read client hello A TLS: can't accept. TLS: error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol s23_srvr.c:565 connection_read(10): TLS accept error error=-1 id=1, closing connection_closing: readying conn=1 sd=10 for close connection_close: conn=1 sd=10 Connecting with openssl s_client -state -debug -connect server:ldaps seems to work fine. The ldap server reports the connection so it doesn't appear to be the server. Thanks, tjb Does anyone have ldaps working? Thanks, tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 09:50, Thomas J. Baker wrote: On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 15:29, Thomas J. Baker wrote: Is ldaps supposed to work? I'm working on setting up an ldap server on a stock Red Hat 8.0 system and have it running with ldap. I now want to swtich to ldaps but the slapd server reports the following error when Evo 1.2.1 tries to connect: connection_get(10) connection_get(10): got connid=1 connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1 TLS trace: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv2/v3 read client hello A TLS: can't accept. TLS: error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol s23_srvr.c:565 connection_read(10): TLS accept error error=-1 id=1, closing connection_closing: readying conn=1 sd=10 for close connection_close: conn=1 sd=10 Connecting with openssl s_client -state -debug -connect server:ldaps seems to work fine. The ldap server reports the connection so it doesn't appear to be the server. Thanks, tjb I verified that mozilla-mail could connect using ldaps so it appears that the problem is with evolution. I thought I saw that Chris said it should work. tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:27, Chris Toshok wrote: I do here. Well, I just fixed a post-1.2.1 regression that was keeping it from working, but 1.2.1 should work.. Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636? Here's my server output (with my latest patch): connection_read(9): checking for input on id=0 TLS trace: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read client hello A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server hello A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write certificate A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write server done A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 flush data TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv3 read client certificate A TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv3 read client certificate A connection_get(9): got connid=0 connection_read(9): checking for input on id=0 TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read client key exchange A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 read finished A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write change cipher spec A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write finished A TLS trace: SSL_accept:SSLv3 flush data Chris That looks like the log when I connect with mozilla-mail. I tried using 389/Always and 636 (Always greyed out). Neither seem to work for me. tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] ldaps?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:02, Tony Earnshaw wrote: fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 19:27 skrev Chris Toshok: Are you connecting to port 389 and doing STARTTLS or connecting to 636? Here's my server output (with my latest patch): Hmmm ... what (Openldap?) version is that, and what debug level? It doesn't tell me anything, compared to the debug output I know from 2.1.x at -d-1. What you quote doesn't show anything, simply that there's been an exchange between server and client. Either can reject, at that stage. I had to debug my own in the beginning, when the CA certificate / server-client exchange wasn't working. Best, Tony I'm using 2.0.25 from Red Hat 8.0 and the debug level was 5. I'm using a self signed certificate. tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] ldaps?
Is ldaps supposed to work? I'm working on setting up an ldap server on a stock Red Hat 8.0 system and have it running with ldap. I now want to swtich to ldaps but the slapd server reports the following error when Evo 1.2.1 tries to connect: connection_get(10) connection_get(10): got connid=1 connection_read(10): checking for input on id=1 TLS trace: SSL_accept:before/accept initialization TLS trace: SSL_accept:error in SSLv2/v3 read client hello A TLS: can't accept. TLS: error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol s23_srvr.c:565 connection_read(10): TLS accept error error=-1 id=1, closing connection_closing: readying conn=1 sd=10 for close connection_close: conn=1 sd=10 Connecting with openssl s_client -state -debug -connect server:ldaps seems to work fine. The ldap server reports the connection so it doesn't appear to be the server. Thanks, tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Bad Record MAC...still]
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 16:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well it's a little hard for me to go to the Moz team with a bug when I have no idea about what functions etc etc Evo is using from libnss. Is there anyone out (t)here that _IS_ successfully using SMTP+SSL? If so, what is your version numbers etc for all parts involved and how do you have things configured? SMTP+SSL works fine for me using stock Red Hat 8.0 packages. The only issue I have is that from home using my work machine as the SMTP server, it has this 30 second delay before actually going through. At work, using the same machine as the server, it sends instantly. Settings are identical, both machine using RH 8.0/Evo 1.2.1. The delay at home seems to be inside evo as the actual connection to the server is not made until the very end. I have seen the Bad Record MAC after upgrading a server to RH 8.0 but that was on the IMAP side. The server key changed and it took much experimenting to make the problem go away and I'm not sure what exact step finally did it. Evo kept giving a message about connecting to port 143 even though I had SSL set to always and it was clearly trying to connect to 993 because I was getting the Bad Mac error message in /var/log/maillog. I could do the openssl s_client -state -debug -connect server:993 and it would work fine so there was nothing wrong with the server but evo would always fail. tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.2 Release Candidate 1
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 13:00, Eric Lambart wrote: I think I've been having the same problem. I don't really use any local mailboxes anymore, but next time Evo freezes I will try them, and I will also try opening a message in a window. When you have this problem, do notifications begin to stack up on the status bar? i.e. Storing folder xxx... Retrieving message xxx... Eric I do not get the stack ups like you. It seems to only occur when there's just one new email in the IMAP box and it's the only thing there. I'll submit a bug. tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.2 Release Candidate 1
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 13:00, Eric Lambart wrote: I think I've been having the same problem. I don't really use any local mailboxes anymore, but next time Evo freezes I will try them, and I will also try opening a message in a window. When you have this problem, do notifications begin to stack up on the status bar? i.e. Storing folder xxx... Retrieving message xxx... Eric I haven't noticed but I'll look for it. tjb -- === | Thomas Baker email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | === signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] keyboard hot keys...
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 10:53, Sean M Alderman wrote: Is it possible to enable hot keys on evolution dialogs so that one doesn't need to use the mouse so much? For instance... Closing a message prompts for Yes/No/Cancel to quit w/o saving...Being able to hit Y or N would be nice, like you can hit ESC to cancel. Is this capability just not there, or is it something I've missed in the configuration. You can use tab to move between buttons in the dialog box and enter or return to execute the button you've selected. tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Control Center/Pilot
I had high hopes that the new version of control center on the preview channel would work with the pilot caplets used by evolution. Is it supposed to work? I thought the two versions of libcaplet would fix the old-version-needed versus new-version-provided problem. Is it possible to get them to work together? Thanks, tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Re: One Specific Folder Not Being Updated On NewMail
On Sat, 2001-12-01 at 14:25, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: On Sat, 2001-12-01 at 08:16, Thomas J. Baker wrote: On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 08:01, Thomas J. Baker wrote: I've got a problem with a single folder/filter combination. I have a folder that has mail filtered to it from a single source. When new mail I have a bug here: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15975 That is a bit more complex but sounds similar, basically its a vfolder with two source folders, one being the sent folder. It only displays the mails from the sent folder if I preform a fake edit on the vfolder rule, I open the editor, click the rule, click edit, then without changes click ok and then the filter works. Mine is with real folders, not vfolders... tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Re: One Specific Folder Not Being Updated On New Mail
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 08:01, Thomas J. Baker wrote: I've got a problem with a single folder/filter combination. I have a folder that has mail filtered to it from a single source. When new mail arrives in that folder, that folder name doesn't get changed to bold in the folder list, nor is it's count updated. Unfortunately, I only get mail that is applicable once a week on Mondays at noon. The last two Tuesday mornings I've come in, started evolution, and it's shown the new messages in that folder so the problem has been occurring for at least two weeks. I just looked at the filter and it seems fine. I'll try to do some more testing to see if I can make it occur consistently. tjb I've had a repeat of this problem. I have a folder for redhat-announce and a corresponding filter. I just notification of a new message from the mail applet, clicked on send/receive in evo, and no folders in the folder view were updated with new messages. I then clicked on the redhat-announce folder and there was a new message in it and the folder went bold. tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] One Specific Folder Not Being Updated On New Mail
I've got a problem with a single folder/filter combination. I have a folder that has mail filtered to it from a single source. When new mail arrives in that folder, that folder name doesn't get changed to bold in the folder list, nor is it's count updated. Unfortunately, I only get mail that is applicable once a week on Mondays at noon. The last two Tuesday mornings I've come in, started evolution, and it's shown the new messages in that folder so the problem has been occurring for at least two weeks. I just looked at the filter and it seems fine. I'll try to do some more testing to see if I can make it occur consistently. tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Spell Checking
On Thu, 2001-11-01 at 16:03, Damon Brodie wrote: I've had this issue under RH 7.2 since I upgraded from 7.1 The bug report has some things to try out: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13925 but nothing has worked for me. Damon. FWIW, I did a clean install of RH 7.2 and spell checking works fine. tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] RedHat 7.2, Evolution 0.16, No Contacts?
Does anyone who installed Red Hat 7.2 still have their contacts? I can't see any even though my contacts db hasn't changed since before the upgrade. Also, I keep getting 'too many open files' dialogs when first starting evo. I did a clean install of RH 7.2 and then upgraded to XG 1.4. Thanks, tjb PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] HTML messages not being quoted in Reply?
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 12:42, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote: Has anyone seen this? I am using cvs snapshot from 10/22. Ujwal I had this problem when the original message only included an HTML version and not a text one. If you have your prefs set to plain text mail and your reply to an HTML one that doesn't include a text version, you get more of a forwarded look. tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] List Working?
Is this list working? I haven't received any email for several days. Thanks, tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] List Working?
On Mon, 2001-10-22 at 13:09, Peter A. Goodall wrote: Everything should be working fine with the Evolution list. Please let us know if you are not receiving your Evolution mail. -- Pete Goodall Support Tech Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] It turns out that somehow my subscription got set to turn delivery off. I'm pretty sure I didn't set it since today was the first day I learned such an option existed but somehow it got set. Anyway, I fixed it and I expect everthing to return to normal now. Thanks, tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] 2001.09.25 Folders Message Count Continued Problems
On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 14:54, Thomas J. Baker wrote: On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 14:01, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote: On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 07:33, Mike Leckey, Jr. wrote: On Mon, 2001-09-24 at 06:05, Thomas J. Baker wrote: I'm still having problems with folder counts with the 9/24 0.14.99 snapshot. Sometimes, folder counts are not updated at all (this has happened on my main Inbox) and sometimes, after reading the mail messages in a given folder, the counts are not updated. My Evolution mailing list folder currently shows 9 new messages but I've read and deleted them all. I'm running RH7.1/Ximian Gnome. Is this working for anyone else? It is working for me. Running 0924 snapshot on rh71 Oops. I meant 09250808 snapshot. Seems to be working better for me too. Same 2001.09.25.08.08 snapshot. tjb But it seems to be back in 2001.09.25.08.08... I had 20 new messages in my Evolution mailbox and after reading and deleting them, the folder list still shows 20 new messages. tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] 2001.09.24 Folders Message Count Continued Problems
I'm still having problems with folder counts with the 9/24 0.14.99 snapshot. Sometimes, folder counts are not updated at all (this has happened on my main Inbox) and sometimes, after reading the mail messages in a given folder, the counts are not updated. My Evolution mailing list folder currently shows 9 new messages but I've read and deleted them all. I'm running RH7.1/Ximian Gnome. Is this working for anyone else? tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] x509 Certificate Verification
On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 16:25, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Also handled by NSS. You should have a utility that comes with nss called certutil for adding/modifying your certificate database. Btw, the Evolution certificate db is in ~/evolution. Jeff Has anyone found this utility on a Red Hat 7.1/Ximian Gnome 1.4 distribution? tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Pilot Support in Snapshots?
Is pilot support supposed to be built into the snapshots now? I thought I saw it on one of the beta releases... tjb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
