[Evolution-hackers] Evoloution and Outlook tasks, connector issue
Hi, I signed up on the list quite long ago to listen on the discussions, however, a long silence have been passed since then. :) So I hope noone dislike my small question. Does Evoloution decode and make use of emails generated by tasks in Outlook? I mean those mails that gets sent when you assign a task in Outlook to a user in your adressbook. Can Evoloution work with those? I read about the Connector that Evoloution can use for integration with MS Exchange, is it possible to use that together with another frontend, such as a webapplication? Any answears and input is appreciated. Best regards, Eric Persson ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Composer failure ...
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:48, Michael Meeks wrote: I'm still having repeated problems with Gconf / evolution ... to no avail. Does anyone have any idea (short of strace 'world', wait for hours) that I could work out who / how that file gets unlinked ? Well - in the end I did just that; and 200Mb of strace log later I got it to misbehave; I caught everything (including gconfd-2) that was execve'd for evolution correctly. Imagine my suprise then to discover that no-one unlinked anything in /tmp/orbit, and yet - the socket node is indeed gone, and the problem shows it's ugly head. [ and gconfd-2 still has it bound / open etc. of course ]. So - can anyone suggest how that file can disappear without it being unlinked by anything forked from evolution ? perhaps I'm missing a 'delete' syscall or something ;-) Really perplexed here, short of stracing every process somehow I don't know how to catch the culprit. Is there any cunning kernel debugging that would do something useful here ? of course - not having any way to predict when it will happen is not helpful either. Regards, Michael. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evoloution and Outlook tasks, connectorissue
On 16 Oct 2002, Dan Winship wrote: Hi, [..] that would implement the same APIs to make Connector do its bidding. But it wouldn't be easy. Depending on how much functionality you needed, it would probably be easier to use Exchange's WebDAV interfaces directly, or to reuse parts of the OWA interface. Sorry for offtopic question - what do you guys think about Exchange's WebDAV - will one miss a lot of Exchange functionality (not considering email - only tasks/contacts/appointments/etc) if he uses Exchange's WebDAV interface? Just very curious. Thank you for the answer in advance! Best regards, -Vlad ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evoloution and Outlook tasks, connectorissue
that would implement the same APIs to make Connector do its bidding. But it wouldn't be easy. Depending on how much functionality you needed, it would probably be easier to use Exchange's WebDAV interfaces directly, or to reuse parts of the OWA interface. Sorry for offtopic question - what do you guys think about Exchange's WebDAV - will one miss a lot of Exchange functionality (not considering email - only tasks/contacts/appointments/etc) if he uses Exchange's WebDAV interface? Basic calendar and contacts functionality is pretty well-documented. (MS seems to have mostly envisioned the WebDAV interface as being for interfacing custom web apps to peoples' Exchange calendars.) More complicated stuff is... well, more complicated. And tasks are completely undocumented. -- Dan ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
