Re: [Evolution-hackers] Why do I need to modify like this?
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 17:51, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote: > Hi Rodrigo, > I will certainly do that. One comment, in my code review I found a small > uuups. I include the header from composer/Composer.h which should be > Evolution-Composer.h, if I'm not mistaken right now. I haven't looked at > the code again and working on my first coffee, I write a program which > writes applications and sometimes finds my mistakes. Anyhow that will be > fixed, it doesn't effect the app. since they are both created from the > same idl just a cosmetic fix. > Another question, there is no evolution-list (addresses) handling in the > Composer corba interface, so I working on adding it. I try to keep it > integrated into the existing code base, as little change as possible. I > will explain why and how when I send the patch. OK, here's the > question, should I include it into the main patch or keep it separated? > if it's for the mailer, that is, another component, might be better to send it separated from the calendar one. cheers -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Why do I need to modify like this?
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 03:03, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 17:51, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote: > > Hi Rodrigo, > > I will certainly do that. One comment, in my code review I found a small > > uuups. I include the header from composer/Composer.h which should be > > Evolution-Composer.h, if I'm not mistaken right now. I haven't looked at > > the code again and working on my first coffee, I write a program which > > writes applications and sometimes finds my mistakes. Anyhow that will be > > fixed, it doesn't effect the app. since they are both created from the > > same idl just a cosmetic fix. > > Another question, there is no evolution-list (addresses) handling in the > > Composer corba interface, so I working on adding it. I try to keep it > > integrated into the existing code base, as little change as possible. I > > will explain why and how when I send the patch. OK, here's the > > question, should I include it into the main patch or keep it separated? > > > if it's for the mailer, that is, another component, might be better to > send it separated from the calendar one. > Yeah, that's what I hoped for, still haven't untangled all the links between mailer and addressbook. There also seems to be a bug in Calendar resolving addresses from a evolution-list, i.e it doesn't. Which I basically will mark but we should actually leave it that way. Maybe make it official, i.e test for a list and than write just the name, as we do now. Don't take my word for it right now, it's just a heads up, I will do more investigation after I got the features I need. Anyhow my reason being, that we need late binding for list-name to actual list. If we think about a recurring meeting and send a reminder to a list of people attending, this list can change. And we don't want to listen to evolution-list changes and then find in calendar all the places we have to change, also how do we do that if we don't have the list name anymore, i.e.resolved it at creation time. There is also the small problem of bcc lists, and how would we store that info in calendar. And I guess we all remember the cases where somebody in a company send cc instead of bcc and how embarrassed some of those companies were, so we don't want to be part of that. That's why I decided to go for late binding and error handling via email, since we can not guarantee somebody sitting in front of the machine when an alarm triggers. The mail can trigger a rule on how to contact the owner in another way, i.e sms to cell But quite frankly evolution is not build for this kind of work, I take it one step at a time. As soon as I have figured out how this all relates I will send separate patches. I will sync with head as soon as I see the light at the end of the tunnel I'm stuck in right now, and I have to do some "real" work :-). BTW, any objections, ideas are as usual well-come. Have fun, Ronald > cheers ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Problems with Evo 1.2 and Courier-Imap
I'm having some problems getting Evo 1.2 to work with my Courier-imap server. I am able to connect and authenticate, and even read mail in my top-level inbox. But Evo doesn't seem to understand my folder colection. It lists the next level of folders under my Inbox, but none of the folders under those. I've tried searching the list archives as well as doing a general google search, but I haven't found any real solution to this. Evo looks great, and I'd love to use it. Does anybody know how to get Evo working with Courier-Imap 1.4.x? TIA, Dave ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Re: [Evolution] Problems with Evo 1.2 and Courier-Imap
Are you subscribed to the folders? It works for me... I use Courier IMAP - as does everyone at Ximian. Jeff On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 13:52, Dave Weiner wrote: > I'm having some problems getting Evo 1.2 to work with my Courier-imap > server. I am able to connect and authenticate, and even read mail in my > top-level inbox. But Evo doesn't seem to understand my folder colection. > It lists the next level of folders under my Inbox, but none of the folders > under those. I've tried searching the list archives as well as doing a > general google search, but I haven't found any real solution to this. Evo > looks great, and I'd love to use it. Does anybody know how to get Evo > working with Courier-Imap 1.4.x? > > TIA, > > Dave > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Re: [Evolution] Problems with Evo 1.2 and Courier-Imap
> Are you subscribed to the folders? It works for me... I use Courier IMAP > - as does everyone at Ximian. Yes, I subscribed to the folders, but most of my "folders" are place holders for more folders under it. Do you have multiple layers of nested folders? What version of Courier? Did you use the --enable-workarounds-for-imap-client-bugs config option when you built Courier? Did you have to specify a namespace in Evo? > Jeff TIA, Dave ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Re: [Evolution] Problems with Evo 1.2 and Courier-Imap
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 14:34, Dave Weiner wrote: > > Are you subscribed to the folders? It works for me... I use Courier IMAP > > - as does everyone at Ximian. > > Yes, I subscribed to the folders, but most of my "folders" are place holders > for more folders under it. Do you have multiple layers of nested folders? yes > What version of Courier? whatever the most recent Debian Woody packages are of I guess. > Did you use > the --enable-workarounds-for-imap-client-bugs config option when you built > Courier? *shrug* Ask the Debian maintainer. My guess is probably not. > Did you have to specify a namespace in Evo? No. Jeff > > > Jeff > > TIA, > > Dave > > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] help on compiling
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 15:39, jonatan wrote: > checking db3 header version... configure: > error: Found db.h is not version 3.1.17 ... > > well, yeah, i have 3.2.9 installed. You must statically install db version 3.1.17 like the instructions say to. See evolution/README. AfC -- Andrew Frederick Cowie, rmc, BEng Australia +61-4-1079-6725 North America +1-646-270-5376 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Order; counterorder; disorder" ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] help on compiling
hi! how do i use evolution 1.2 on debian sid? no package available, red carpet doesnt work on sid, i cant compile the source because it says checking db3 header version... configure: error: Found db.h is not version 3.1.17 ... well, yeah, i have 3.2.9 installed. now what? :) thanks, jonatan ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] help on compiling
> how do i use evolution 1.2 on debian sid? You wait for eight hours, do an apt-get update && apt-get install evolution. The maintainer has already uploaded it and it's in the pending queue for sid. Ray ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
