Re: [Evolution] Gmail - BAD certificate message occurs constantly
hi your not the only one i'm getting the same message from Evolution 2.10.1 mail program from gmail ssl SSL Certificate check for smtp.gmail.com: Issuer:[EMAIL PROTECTED],CN=Thawte Premium Server CA,OU=Certification Services Division,O=Thawte Consulting cc,L=Cape Town,ST=Western Cape,C=ZA Subject: CN=smtp.gmail.com,O=Google Inc,L=Mountain View,ST=California,C=US Fingerprint: f1:d3:de:59:9d:9c:e2:31:ea:aa:2c:a0:fc:ad:9a:61 Signature: BAD Do you wish to accept? Daniel Caleb-2 wrote: > > Hello, > > First off, thanks for Evolution - it really has simplified so many > tasks... > > The issue - several times a day when Evolution (2.22.3.1) checks my > Gmail Pop accounts, I receive the following pop-up: > > SSL Certificate check for pop.gmail.com: > > Issuer:OU=Equifax Secure Certificate > Authority,O=Equifax,C=US > Subject: CN=pop.gmail.com,O=Google Inc.,L=Mountain > View,ST=California,C=US > Fingerprint: 44:a8:e9:2c:fb:a9:7e:6d:f9:db:f3:62:b2:9e:f1:a9 > Signature: BAD > > Do you wish to accept? > > Clicking OK obviously accepts the certificate, however only temporarily, > this happens several times a day and if I am not present at the time the > pop-up occurs then mail delivery fails until I click OK. > > AND on the reverse, when sending mail I get a similar notification > however for a different security certificate: > > SSL Certificate check for smtp.gmail.com: , pop.gmail.com: > > Issuer:[EMAIL PROTECTED],CN=Thawte Premium Server > CA,OU=Certification Services Division,O=Thawte Consulting cc,L=Cape > Town,ST=Western Cape,C=ZA > Subject: CN=smtp.gmail.com,O=Google Inc,L=Mountain > View,ST=California,C=US > Fingerprint: 32:66:6c:0a:dc:4f:2d:f9:83:2e:b4:aa:22:a7:e0:e7 > Signature: BAD > > Do you wish to accept? > > Is there a way to add the Gmail certificate permanently? I know in Edit > | Pref | Certificates, I can import a certificate, but I was under the > assumption that this is for personal certificates off private servers. I > found the server certificate for Equifax, however it is already added as > a certificate authority. > > Thanks again, > Daniel > > Debian Lenny (2.6.25 kernel), Evolution 2.22.3.1 with Gmail POP3 > accounts > ___ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Gmail---BAD-certificate-message-occurs-constantly-tp18647852p19255982.html Sent from the Gnome Evolution - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 01:09 -0400, Ian Mortimer wrote: > Messages aren't actually deleted until you Expunge the Trash (which > removes all deleted messages) or Expunge in a folder which removes all > deleted messages in that folder. Is this also the case when your account is exchange-based? -- Art Alexion Resources for Human Development, Inc. 215-951-0300 x3075 4700 Wissahickon Ave. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Philadelphia, PA 19144www.rhd.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 09:54 -0400, Art Alexion wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 01:09 -0400, Ian Mortimer wrote: > > Messages aren't actually deleted until you Expunge the Trash (which > > removes all deleted messages) or Expunge in a folder which removes all > > deleted messages in that folder. > > Is this also the case when your account is exchange-based? I have no direct knowledge of this, but I believe Evo tries to be consistent and applies the IMAP model across the board. It also does it with local (i.e. POP) mail. poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 11:23 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Is this also the case when your account is exchange-based? > > I have no direct knowledge of this, but I believe Evo tries to be > consistent and applies the IMAP model across the board. It also does it > with local (i.e. POP) mail. The last time I connected Evolution to Exchange was with 2.12. At that time it followed the Exchange model: deleted messages were moved to the "Deleted Items" folder. I haven't been able to get 2.22.3.1 to work with our Exchange server except as an imap client so I can't say if that's still the case. -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 07:44 +1000, Ian Mortimer wrote: > The last time I connected Evolution to Exchange was with 2.12. > At that time it followed the Exchange model: deleted messages were > moved to the "Deleted Items" folder. This is indeed how it works: it uses the Exchange model. As far as I can see, expunge doesn't do anything at all to exchange accounts. Unselecting "Hide Deleted Messages" doesn't change the contents of my Inbox even though I have LOTS of messages I've deleted. To clear out the "Deleted Items" folder I go to that folder, select the messages I want to be "really deleted", and use "Delete" on them. > I haven't been able to get 2.22.3.1 to work with our Exchange server > except as an imap client so I can't say if that's still the case. Is your server running Exchange 2007? I have no problems with Exchange 2003 and Evo 2.22.3.1. ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 07:44 +1000, Ian Mortimer wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 11:23 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > Is this also the case when your account is exchange-based? > > > > I have no direct knowledge of this, but I believe Evo tries to be > > consistent and applies the IMAP model across the board. It also does it > > with local (i.e. POP) mail. > > The last time I connected Evolution to Exchange was with 2.12. > At that time it followed the Exchange model: deleted messages were > moved to the "Deleted Items" folder. > > I haven't been able to get 2.22.3.1 to work with our Exchange server > except as an imap client so I can't say if that's still the case. OK, that's useful to know. It would also seem to imply that there could be surprises in store for anyone who mixes IMAP-mode Exchange access with the other thing (since they have two different models of what "delete" means). poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 18:09 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > Is your server running Exchange 2007? I have no problems with Exchange > 2003 and Evo 2.22.3.1. 2003. I have to admit I didn't try very hard to get it configured. imap suits me better in most respects. -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
Moving a message and then putting it into the Trash Folder and the target folder. It should not show in the trash folder, it confuses me and many people. It also makes the trash not readable. I am getting a 100-200 emails a day and keep 50%, but move them into different folders ... But if I have to look up a deleted email, its really difficult to find in the trash. (Offline Mode) Purging the trash in Outlook/Exchange works the same as in Evolution. When you Purge Trash (or delete contents of the deleted items folder in outlook), then only these are removed from the Server trash. I think it would be good for the Evo team to look towards Kontact Kmail Korganizer in KDE4.1 Ver, very nice. In effect, if you could < or they could > use Evo Exchange data provider with Kontact, that would be just fantastic. No one in the Kontact community is focused on Exchange/Ouotlook at all. Personally, I would love to see both project merging. The Kontact team created a very nice and intuitive front end, but the Evo team has just so much more know how on the Exchange, but also imap connector side. Food for thought! Axel __ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
