Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!
Patrick; I thought I remembered seeing a bug for this a while ago. On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 23:47 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 20:15 -0500, William Case wrote: > > Ahh ... > > > > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 18:07 -0500, William Case wrote: > > > > Hi; > > > > > > > > Just re-posing a question about a request for an enhancement. Am I > > > > alone in wanting this? > > > > > > > > I know there was a bug (request for enhancement) filed against Evolution > > > > requesting an undo key or Edit tab undo for flagging read/unread mail. > > > > It shouldn't be difficult. If it went back 5 -20 read flags it would > > > > save me from a lot of grief produced by accidentally flagging a message > > > > as being read when in fact I hadn't read it yet. > > > > > > What's wrong with just unflagging it yourself (Shift-Ctrl-K)? > > > > > Nothing if my cursor is still on it. But then I know where the mail is > > and I can read the message. Backing up to read rather than having the > > message remain bolded is the point. > > > > Just now I accidentally hit the '.' twice while being distracted. The > > cursor naturally jumped two messages and it took me a frustratingly long > > time (perhaps 10-20 sec) to go back up the list looking for the message > > I had missed. > > I see. I actually have "mark read after N seconds" turned off, so I mark > messages as read explicitly (Ctrl-K), i.e. I use "read" to mean "dealt > with". I realize this isn't the way most people do it, but it does mean > the kind of problem you mention doesn't arise (I can easily hit "," to > back to the previous "unread" message). > > > On other occasions, I get zipping along flagging read messages (I could > > easily have 50 at a time) and then realize I should have stopped to read > > an earlier message rather than just breezing by, but I am unable to > > backup easily or accurately. > > I would actually love to have an undo for deletes, similar to what you > describe for "read". I occasionally delete something without intending > to. Even though I can undelete it, I first need to find it ... > > BTW I requested this almost exactly four years ago. See > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271140. I see it's marked as > RESOLVED INVALID, which I presume means "we aren't going to do this". > I am not a programmer but creating a small plugin that has a short stack of recent 'delete' or 'read' operations shouldn't be difficult. It is mainly a matter of removing or adding flags. I will re-file a Request For Enhancement this evening or tomorrow morning. Evolution is now in the hands of Gnome programmers, there are probably new people who can see the benefit of an 'undo' enhancement for 'delete' and 'read' and perhaps this request will get more user support. -- Regards Bill Fedora 10, Gnome 2.24.3 Evo.2.24.3, Emacs 22.2.1 ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Ctl-Z = undo, Please !!
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:49 -0500, William Case wrote: > > BTW I requested this almost exactly four years ago. See > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271140. I see it's marked > as > > RESOLVED INVALID, which I presume means "we aren't going to do > this". > > > I am not a programmer but creating a small plugin that has a short > stack > of recent 'delete' or 'read' operations shouldn't be difficult. It is > mainly a matter of removing or adding flags. I don't know that a plugin is the best way (it strikes me as something that everyone would want if it existed) but whatever works ... > I will re-file a Request For Enhancement this evening or tomorrow > morning. Evolution is now in the hands of Gnome programmers, there > are > probably new people who can see the benefit of an 'undo' enhancement > for > 'delete' and 'read' and perhaps this request will get more user > support. Thanks Bill. If you do that please post the BZ number here so I can add my 2 cents. BTW, this isn't the first time we've discussed this :-) See http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2005-November/msg00371.html et seq. Also http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2007-October/msg00185.html et seq. poc ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Evolution newbie questions
I've just finished an install of Gnome on Mandriva 2009. First time I've used Gnome and Evolution so pardon some probably simple questions. 1. I use a script for my signature. In all other MTA's I've used there is a -- before the signature, I don't see that here in Evolution. Where/how is it added? BTW, I added the -- manually on the below sig. So far I like Evolution, it appears to be a lot faster than Kmail, just takes some getting used to I guess. Chris -- KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C Live - The Rolling Stones - I can't get no satisfaction (Absolute Classic Rock, live from London, UK Hi BR MP3) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] IMAP IDLE extension
Norman, Lets take it over bugzilla. Lemme read the code and get back there. -Srini. On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 18:50 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > The IMAP IDLE extension allows conforming servers (e.g. Cyrus, > Gmail, ...) to notify clients of new mail, without the latter having to > poll them. It's a Good Thing (tm). > > It seems that support for the IDLE extension was planned for Evo 2.24 > but didn't make it. It's now on the roadmap for 2.26. Does anyone know > if it's really going to happen this time? > > poc > > ___ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all i want...
Its beter, if it is stopped. Or make sure that no other task [filtering, downloading] is in progress while you are doing this. It might lock the db. -Srini. On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 15:02 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 09:56 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > > http://www.gnome.org/~sragavan/evolution-rebuild-summarydb > > > > > > It vacuums the db. I'm looking to do it programmatic, but it makes lot > > of difference. > > Does evolution have to be stopped to do this? > > b. > > ___ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
