Re: [Evolution] Meeting invitation responses always Tentative

2013-01-02 Thread Graham Murray
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 14:24 +, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 12:56 +, Graham Murray wrote:
> > Evolution version 3.6.2 
> > 
> > Whenever I receive a meeting invitation (from the exchange server) and
> > press 'Accept', the sender always sees it as a 'Tentative' response. The
> > meeting requests give the options of 'Decline', 'Tentative' and
> > 'Accept'. Whether I choose 'Tentative' or 'Accept', it is always
> > actioned as Tentative.
> 
> Which exchange backend is used in Evolution?
> 

EWS
Exchange is Small Business Server 2008


___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.6.0 hangs with a large number of unknown jobs

2013-01-02 Thread Reid Thompson
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 13:27 -0800, Per wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Reid Thompson  wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 10:17 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 00:27 -0800, Paco Pineda wrote:
> >> > (ironical mode on) In my own short understanding (ironical mode off), all
> >> > questions you refeer was replied by Per in his last November message.
> >>
> >> No. (Or I didn't receive all answers though I'm subscribed.)
> >
> > you did not miss them.  OP didn't quite get the debug instructions
> > right.  I posted a follow up noting where I thought he'd gotten
> > offtrack, but there was no response/follow on to that from the OP
> 
> The bug was also posted on bugzilla, and I took it from there. The
> suggestion to disable downloading images appears to have resolved the
> problem in my case. For specifics, see Milan Crha's suggestions here;
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688622
> 
> From 3.5.92 the bug appears permanently resolved even with image
> download enabled, although I've been unable to test that (still
> running 3.6.0).
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682295

it is fixed in the later versions - i can vouch for that


> 
> 
>  - Per
> 

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.6.0 hangs with a large number of unknown jobs

2013-01-02 Thread Per
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Reid Thompson  wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 10:17 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 00:27 -0800, Paco Pineda wrote:
>> > (ironical mode on) In my own short understanding (ironical mode off), all
>> > questions you refeer was replied by Per in his last November message.
>>
>> No. (Or I didn't receive all answers though I'm subscribed.)
>
> you did not miss them.  OP didn't quite get the debug instructions
> right.  I posted a follow up noting where I thought he'd gotten
> offtrack, but there was no response/follow on to that from the OP

The bug was also posted on bugzilla, and I took it from there. The
suggestion to disable downloading images appears to have resolved the
problem in my case. For specifics, see Milan Crha's suggestions here;
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688622

>From 3.5.92 the bug appears permanently resolved even with image
download enabled, although I've been unable to test that (still
running 3.6.0).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682295


 - Per


> evolution-list mailing list
> evolution-list@gnome.org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Message saving format(s)?

2013-01-02 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:17 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 11:37 -0800, Brewster Gillett wrote:
> > Suppose someone wishes to save a message to file as plain text,
> > rather than in "mbox" format?
> Which information would that plain text format [not] include compared to
> mbox format? To me, mbox *is* plain text format, as it has the all
> information in a simple text format that can be read by humans (though
> some header lines are likely very uninteresting).

Yea, I tend to agree.

The user can always click in the message body Ctrl-A, Ctrl-C ... go to
their document editor of choice and Ctrl-V.

Or drag-to-select the message header AND body [although again  - which
body?].

The truth is that an e-mail message is an envelope, headers, and
multiple [potentially nested] parts [zero, one, or several of which may
be the 'body' - and that body can reference other parts].  So there just
cannot be a e-mail-message-as-plain-text without *assuming* all kinds of
behaviors that person A is going to think is right and person B is going
to think is wrong and both A and B will be right and wrong.

-- 
Adam Tauno Williams  GPG D95ED383
Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Message saving format(s)?

2013-01-02 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 11:37 -0800, Brewster Gillett wrote:
> Suppose someone wishes to save a message to file as plain text,
> rather than in "mbox" format?

Which information would that plain text format [not] include compared to
mbox format? To me, mbox *is* plain text format, as it has the all
information in a simple text format that can be read by humans (though
some header lines are likely very uninteresting).

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] Message saving format(s)?

2013-01-02 Thread Brewster Gillett
Evo 3.2.3 under Ubuntu 12.04

Suppose someone wishes to save a message to file as plain text,
rather than in "mbox" format?

I have gone through every single major tab on Evo. I have read through
the help headings from top to bottom. Nowhere can I locate any option
setting that will wire around this apparently mandatory format setting
in the latest version to which I was just upgraded by my Ubuntu
upgrade. 

Does anyone know how to override this?

Thank you,


Brewster
-- 
***
 W. Brewster Gillettb...@fdi.usPortland, OR  USA
***
 Simply because you don't like to hear it, that doesn't make it untrue.
***

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.6.0 hangs with a large number of unknown jobs

2013-01-02 Thread Reid Thompson
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 10:17 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 00:27 -0800, Paco Pineda wrote:
> > (ironical mode on) In my own short understanding (ironical mode off), all
> > questions you refeer was replied by Per in his last November message.
> 
> No. (Or I didn't receive all answers though I'm subscribed.)

you did not miss them.  OP didn't quite get the debug instructions
right.  I posted a follow up noting where I thought he'd gotten
offtrack, but there was no response/follow on to that from the OP


> andre



___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.6.0 hangs with a large number of unknown jobs

2013-01-02 Thread Reid Thompson
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 13:14 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 10:42 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > It looks like CAMEL_DEBUG=all , despite its name does *NOT* dump 
> > everything.  Is this correct?
> 
> Incorrect, at least for IMAP and POP3 debugging.  The values I gave you
> are a subset of "all", showing primarily the raw protocol I/O, which is
> what I though you wanted.
> 
> Matthew Barnes
> 
> ___
> evolution-list mailing list
> evolution-list@gnome.org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Disable  'Download images from the Internet' in the account
settings/preferences and restart and see if this alleviates the issue.  If it 
does,
then I believe that the issue has been resolved in later versions.   

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?email1=Reid&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&query_format=advanced&order=bug_id%20DESC&query_based_on=
   

note the most recent bugs indicating deadlock



___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] MS Exchange version

2013-01-02 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)  


Can Evolution be set to pick-up the users logins from MS Exchange and Active 
Directory?  


At work we have MS Server 2008.  How do i find out which version of MS Exchange 
it is using?  Is the "Active Directory" (?) part of that or how do i find which 
version of that is being used?  


Does it make a difference if we have fetchmail running on our Debian firewall 
but that is on a different network segment from the network-segment the 
desktops are on and i don't know enough about networks to access it or even 
whether that is a bad idea or not.  


On Windows people can move to any new machine they like and just login using 
the same login as they use on any desktop machine they have been using already. 
 Then they set-up Outlook by just waiting for the fields to fill up 
automatically and then click on Next.  There's no time when they have to 
remember or know anything.  Unfortunately i haven't been able to set-up 
anything like that on Gnu&Linux.  On each machine i have set-up each local user 
separately.  So, i use Outlooks "OWA" system to read the emails inside a 
web-browser.  That works well enough for me and even gives me an advantage but 
ideally i would like each local user to be able to use Evolution to read 
everything they currently use Outlook for (emails and calendars).


I take it that i would need to understand a LOT more about networking in order 
to achieve anything like that?  (or could i try to fudge it with a little help?)

Regards from 

Tom :)  
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Meeting invitation responses always Tentative

2013-01-02 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 12:56 +, Graham Murray wrote:
> Evolution version 3.6.2 
> 
> Whenever I receive a meeting invitation (from the exchange server) and
> press 'Accept', the sender always sees it as a 'Tentative' response. The
> meeting requests give the options of 'Decline', 'Tentative' and
> 'Accept'. Whether I choose 'Tentative' or 'Accept', it is always
> actioned as Tentative.

Which exchange backend is used in Evolution?

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] Meeting invitation responses always Tentative

2013-01-02 Thread Graham Murray
Evolution version 3.6.2 

Whenever I receive a meeting invitation (from the exchange server) and
press 'Accept', the sender always sees it as a 'Tentative' response. The
meeting requests give the options of 'Decline', 'Tentative' and
'Accept'. Whether I choose 'Tentative' or 'Accept', it is always
actioned as Tentative.

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] Build Evolution using Clang 3.2: Best way to fix warnings?

2013-01-02 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Evolution,


does anybody use Clang to build Evolution?

Building Evolution 3.4.4 with Clang 3.1, failed with a segmentation
fault in Clang, but using Clang 3.2 seems to work and it generates
several warnings.

I would like to avoid opening a ticket for each warning in the Bugzilla
bug tracker and attach a patch to it as this takes to much time, I do
not want to spend as I also have to check applicability to the master
branch. Any other idea, how this “project” could be addressed?


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list