Re: [Evolution] Tagging emails as important automatically
Am Samstag, den 29.06.2013, 13:47 +0100 schrieb Pedro Francisco: > Hello! > I was talking with a friend about the usefulness of Gmail's > "Important" folder/tag (and most recently, the Social / Promotions / > Updates / Forums folders/tags) and I was wondering how feasible would > it be to implement such a mechanism by using a spam filter. > > The idea, speaking specifically for the "Important" tag, would be > using a bogofilter / spamassassin configuration (independent from the > one detecting spam) and training it to detect certain emails and > attributing them the 'important' tag. > > Would this be feasible? > > -- > Pedro > ___ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list Sure, use message filters, available in the main menu under Edit->Message Filters. Create a new rule, add action "Set Label". -- thomas ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Tagging emails as important automatically
Hello! I was talking with a friend about the usefulness of Gmail's "Important" folder/tag (and most recently, the Social / Promotions / Updates / Forums folders/tags) and I was wondering how feasible would it be to implement such a mechanism by using a spam filter. The idea, speaking specifically for the "Important" tag, would be using a bogofilter / spamassassin configuration (independent from the one detecting spam) and training it to detect certain emails and attributing them the 'important' tag. Would this be feasible? -- Pedro ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] .cache/evolution/mail any cleanup logic?
On Sat, 2013-06-29 at 00:52 -0400, Jeff Fortin wrote: > Seems like I'm late to the party, but this is a very interesting thread > that touches upon something I've been meaning to ask for a while: does > Evolution automatically cleanup/prune old configs and data (not "cache") > from deleted accounts? > > Corollary: do we, as users, have to manually cleanup the cruft of older > versions in the case where we have dutifully upgraded from one to > another (2.32 to 3.0 to 3.2 to 3.4 to 3.6, soon 3.8 when Fedora 19 comes > out)? > > Perhaps I'm a neat-freak for even thinking about this, but it would be > reassuring to know that the present files (other than the cache) are > only what's necessary (can make backups and troubleshooting easier)... As of 3.6, Evolution... well, technically the evolution-source-registry daemon, does clean up data and cache from old accounts. But it does so very conservatively, waiting days or even weeks depending on the account type so you have plenty of opportunity to recover data if you need to. I can go into more detail about that if you're curious. As for config, there's two places I know of where some UI state cruft is left behind: 1) ~/.config/evolution/mail/state.ini 2) The "expanded" files under ~/.config/evolution/mail/folders. But this is a tiny amount of data and not a priority to automatically clean up. It's easy enough to do so manually, if you really care. If you do find more cruft than what I listed, please file bugs. Even I haven't dutifully upgraded since 2.32. :) Matthew Barnes ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
