Re: [Evolution] unsubscribe
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:56:42 +0100 perami paivacravo wrote: > I Can't get to unscribe using the url indicated below... What happens? When I click on the "Unsubscribe ot edit options" I do get the unsubscribe page. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] how to debug evolution
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 08:48 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > There must be some way to debug what Evo is doing or complaining about; > every good developer implements this; I don't see any hints, not even in > the FAQ; there is only something like "export GROUPWISE_DEBUG =1 in a > terminal and launch evolution", so I tried: > > LANG=C export LANG > debug=1 > Debug=1 > DEBUG=1 > export debug Debug DEBUG > evolution > > with no luck; any hints about log/debug files? thx > > matthias Yes, please see http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/bugs.shtml. This is probably what you need. It also might be a good idea to add it to the FAQ, if it is not there... Regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] conversion of Evolution makefile to git
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 18:12 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Hello! > > Attached is a patch which changes the Makefile v2.12 from > http://mad-scientist.us/evolution.html so that it checks out sources > from the new git.gnome.org instead of the obsolete svn.gnome.org. Thanks! I had one prototype off Paul's Makefile, and was still working on it, but yours is certainly more complete. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] I know it's not about Evolution, but...
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 17:37 -0700, Scott Richards wrote: > I don't see how to change the outbound port for that account in > evolution. It must be possible. Yes. Use : instead of just : smtp.myserver.domain:1025 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution and Seahorse Encryption Key Manager
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 14:47 +0100, pjhannon wrote: > Hi > I am using Ubuntu 9:04 and each time I start Evolution Seahorse wants > me to do something about a password - can some kind person please tell > me how to make Seahorse stop or go away please. I have tied > uninstalling it but was told that it can't be uninstalled as > applications depend upon it. Hi, Although you do not really explain what is it Seahorse want you do to, I will assume it is asking you to provide the passphrase to open the keyring. This means you have changed your login passphrase, and it no longer matches Seahorse's login keyring passphrase. All you need to do is run Seahorse (Applications/Accessories/Password and Encryption Keys), select the Passwords tab, right-click on the Login keyring, select "change passsword", and make it identical to your login password. Evolution, since a few releases, will always use Seahorse if it is available. This is not an option. Cheers, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] suggestion for evolution
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 08:17 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > Work offline should be transparent to the user. > > > > > > jay > > Besides, there's already an indicator of 'work offline' (a disconnected > plug at the bottom-left). Its obvious what it means once you think to > look. I dispute the obvious part. It is *obvious* to those that know what to look for, *not* to the casual user. And, before you raise the issue, I am *NOT* a casual user. But it is not, by a long shot, obvious "once one thinks to look". Apart from the prejudice (from the latin, pre judice, "to judge in advance [before knowing the facts]"), your statement is overly aggressive, implying the original poster does (or did) not think, or want(ed) to. Please be more courteous. Everybody will enjoy more your knowledge this way. Also, please keep in mind those that know more are here to direct, instruct, and pass knowledge, to those that know less. In a nice way. And I think the original poster does have a point. Regards, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] how retrieve only recent messages (50/100) in inbox
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 05:51 +0530, Rajz M wrote: > This is first time i am using evolution mail > I so happy that i congiured evolution mail with GMail servers. > but problem now is that when i featch my INbox it starts from old > messages ,time when my mail id was created > i tried for all options but couldn't find any similar > > how retrieve only recent messages (first 50/100 ) in inbox ? > how to configure that ? I do remember a setting on Gmail that would state something like "send all messages, even the old ones". You may want to login to web gamil, and look at the settings. It's there somewhere. Cheers, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Unsubscribe
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 09:12 -0400, Joshua Tarplin wrote: > Please unsubscribe me Please oversubscribe yourself. At the bottom of all emails sent by the mailing list you will find a link: http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list Go there, and unsubscribe yourself. Thank you. > ___ > Evolution-list mailing list > Evolution-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Changing Port 25 to Port 587
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:12:59 -0700 John Maxwell wrote: > Adam, > I have tried all of those variations including mail.XXX.com:587, > smtp.XXX.com:587 and restarting the machine between changes, > unfortunately they have not worked. Originally mail.XXX.com worked > for years before Verizon made the changes Monday. My email server is > at my old ISP that we have used for years. A call to them revealed > that mail.XXX.com is the proper syntax and if the email client needs > port 587 then it resides with the client and the host isp. Please run Evo from a terminal as follows: env CAMEL_DEBUG=all evolution >& evo.log Then try to send an email; it should fail. Quit Evo, so that the log will not get larger, and now look at the log. The error should be there. Cheers, signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] New makefile for building Evolution from GIT
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:10:25 -0400 Paul Smith wrote: > > So, this is more of a debugging aid at this point than a true stable > replacement. I'm looking for folks who are intrepid and maybe know a > bit about building software and makefiles, who'd like to give it a try > and let me know what's broken/missing/etc. If that's you let me know > and I'll send you a copy. Hi Paul, Yes, I am willing to check it (and actually use it). Can you please send me the Makefile? Thanks (and thank you very much for your work on that, beats jhbuild by a long shot). Cheers, ..Carl.. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Gnome bug 595389 -- call for a test
All, I was looking at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595389 (which I myself filed, about a month ago). I would like those of you that are running Evolution 2.28, either distro or GIT, to run a simple test: stop Evolution, and then re-start it from a terminal after setting up an environment variable: export CAMEL_SQLITE_DEFAULT_CACHE_SIZE=2000 evolution and then *guesstimate* it the startup was faster or slower than the normal startup. By "startup" I mean the time it takes for all tables to be read and scanned (look at the bottom of the Evo pane, where messages are usually displayed). Then try to jump around folders, and again *guesstimate* if the jump is faster or slower, again looking at the bottom of the Evo pane. Of course, this is a very gross test. Not only is it being, er, measured visually, but there are many other details that affect the results: - if you are running IMAP, or e-e - if you have a lot of emails stored, - some of your Evolution options, - etc. But, in my case -- local IMAP server storing pretty much all of my email, with 5 different email accounts, about 50,000 emails stored -- the difference between the runs is *very* clear. Please reply either directly to me, or to the list. But please, do test. Thank you, and cheers, ..C.. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Unreadable email from evo-mapi plugin
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 21:47 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > This is the content of the attachement.dat -- all you have to do is > save it and open it in an editor. In my case, not even that -- clicking on the down arrow at the attachment bar at the bottom of the email nicely presented it inline. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] How do you install 2.29 on Ubuntu 9.10?
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 06:49 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 14:07 -0800, Bryan Karlan wrote: > > I want to try 2.29 to see what it has improved upon. I have little > > experience with Linux. I have Ubuntu 9.10. I have downloaded the > > file and have extracted it. However, I find no install or setup file > > as you would in Windows. I still can't understand why in Linux such > > simple things are made so darn complicated. How can I figure this > > program out if I can't even figure out how to install it? > > > > Bryan > > Perhaps you should figure out how things work in Linux? You need to > compile it. Compiling Evo isn't the simplest place/package to get > started on. 2.29.x are milestone development versions. They are provided primarily to developers (or advanced users) for tests. A specific Linux distribution may package it if it wants to, but there are no expectations of correct behaviour. For Ubuntu, we will eventually package it (or next milestone) for Lucid (10.04). We will not make it available for 9.10, though. Anyway, when Lucid it released, it will have the 2.30 (stable release) Evolution, *not* a 2.29.*. In summary: 2.29.2 is a *source* distribution of Evolution, not a compiled package. It is expected the downloader will build it. As Ng Oon-Ee points out, building Evo is not a simple task, anyway. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Memo seg faults Evo
On 12/16/2009 07:07 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > Hi, > > Since I upgraded to Evo 2.28 I get a seg fault when I add a memo. Here's > the output when run from the command line: > > plecaval...@plc:~$ evolution > > ** (evolution:11140): CRITICAL **: atk_object_set_name: assertion > `name != NULL' failed > > (evolution:11140): evolution-shell-WARNING **: The name > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files > > > ** (evolution:11140): CRITICAL **: atk_object_set_name: assertion > `name != NULL' failed > > ** (evolution:11140): CRITICAL **: atk_object_set_name: assertion > `name != NULL' failed > > ** (evolution:11140): CRITICAL **: atk_object_set_name: assertion > `name != NULL' failed > > ** (evolution:11140): CRITICAL **: atk_object_set_name: assertion > `name != NULL' failed > > ** (evolution:11140): CRITICAL **: atk_object_set_name: assertion > `name != NULL' failed > Segmentation fault > plecaval...@plc:~$ > Well, the stdout/stderr output does not help much -- it would be better with a backtrace --, but this sounds like bug 460050 [1]. Do you have it applied? Cheers, [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460050 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] IMAP vs. POP
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:34:22 -0600 Bart wrote: > Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't > need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my > single machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation > messages. I keep my folders quite small in size/number of messages. > I have a huge distrust of having personal stuff on someone else's > computer. I know it passes through one, but it doesn't stay. > > Would you agree in my situation I am as well served with POP3 as IMAP? Even if going rather OT by now: 1. Your distrust of having personal stuff on someone else's computer, although correct (I am also paranoid), does not change the fact that simply by using public ISPs (either as the source, sink, or forwarder) has already made your personal stuff be accessible by anyone in the middle. As such, trust/distrust in third parties does not affect a decision between either POP or IMAP. 2. If you only use one machine, and will keep on using the same one machine until hell freezes over, or you die, or you cease to use email (any condition satisfies) then certainly POP is more than enough. If not, you may want to consider IMAP. 3. POP allows for offline access of emails (already received, of course), IMAP does not (but most clients will offer the option for local storage of email). As simple as that ;-) Cheers. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] syntax on evolution-webcal-notify.c
Hi,
I corrected a small glitch, I guess a left over, in webcal: the
e_source_color_spec() call was missing the '_spec' part.
Please check & apply.
..C..
From 6bf5fead12f1989aa37c6fc4ffbd95185d08cbee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: C de-Avillez
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:05:58 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] src/evolution-webcal-notify.c: correct call -
'e_source_color_spec', as opposed to 'e_source_color'
---
src/evolution-webcal-notify.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/evolution-webcal-notify.c
b/src/evolution-webcal-notify.c
index 77251d4..df481ec 100644
--- a/src/evolution-webcal-notify.c
+++ b/src/evolution-webcal-notify.c
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ void e_webcal_query_user (const gchar * name, const
gchar * desc,
gtk_color_button_get_color (GTK_COLOR_BUTTON (cbutton), &color);
icolor = ((color.red >> 8) << 16) | ((color.green >> 8) << 8) |
(color.blue >> 8);
-e_source_set_color (source, icolor);
+e_source_set_color_spec (source, icolor);
if (!strncmp (caluri, WEBCAL_BASE_URI, 9)) {
e_source_set_relative_uri (source, caluri + 9);
--
1.7.0.4
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] unsubscribe
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:54 +0200, Alpar Juttner wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 16:37 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > El día Tuesday, April 13, 2010 a las 09:34:13AM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan > > escribió: > > > > > However, you actually *can* unsubscribe via mail, see > > > http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030537. Thus, someone > > > could unsubscribe from this list by sending a message (any message, it > > > doesn't matter) to . > > > > > > However saying this is probably a waste of time since the intended > > > audience isn't going to read it. > > > > Fully agree. This is just another example of: Nobody reads anything, who > > does, will not understand in most of the cases, who understands, will > > forget it soon. (based on Stanislav Lem, I think) > > These "unsubscribe" emails are posted regularly and the answer is always > an angry > > > > ___ > > > evolution-list mailing list > > > evolution-list@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list > > > Read this and unsubscribe yourself > > > To be honest, it is not very clear for me why the users are expected to > find out that they should follow that link in order to unsubscribe. > > What about replacing this footer to something more informative instead > of blaming the users all the time for not clicking each and every link > the can see? I agree. It should, instead, say something like: Modify settings or unsubscribe at:http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list It does not hurt to state it. Who manages the Evolution-list? ..C.. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Building Evolution
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 14:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:03 +0200, Thomas Novin wrote: > > You can also use > > https://launchpad.net/~francesco-marella/+archive/unstable-evolution > > > > It sounds a lot smarter if we make an group-effort to create/maintain > > a > > evolution 2.30 ppa with all necessary packages than dozens/hundreds of > > people compiling it. > > Is PPA an Ubuntu term? Many of us use Fedora, Suse, etc. and this > wouldn't appear to be of much use to us. Yes, it is, and stands for "Personal Package Archive". Of course, this will be only of use for Ubuntu (and Ubuntu-derived) distros. Other distros will probably have something similar, and it would be nice to have them described here. Cheers, ..C.. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
