Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?

2007-11-07 Thread Todd Ness

 
 Before anyone asks, upgrading to the Rawhide
 version means installing a large number of additional packages so I
 don't care to do that, having had other stability problems with Rawhide
 in the past.
 
 poc

I think that upgrading only to find new and different problems is
un-settling at best. Also, I am not keen on the fact that evolution is
so dependent on so many other packages, gtk, libsoup, etc. and the only
convenient way to upgrade evolution is to upgrade to a newer version of
your favorite OS. This is the kind of thing that prevents Linux from
making any ground in the enterprise for regular everyday users. Way too
much change and a lack stability. When I get newer versions of Firefox
or Thunderbird I don't have to upgrade my whole OS and should not. Just
a thought don't flame me to death over this it is just a suggestion that
if evolution could stand on it's own on a Linux platform that would sure
help.

And yes there are way more problems with the exchange accounts on
evolution than there are with IMAP or POP accounts. 
Filters are flaky on exchange, the whole exchange backend process dies a
lot. whereas my POP account just keeps working and the filters work for
it as well.

Todd
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] evolution problem

2007-11-07 Thread Todd Ness
 Well that worked magic for me, things are back to normal, and as an
 added bonus this started the filters working on the exchange inbox which
 I had given up on getting an answer on.
 

The filters worked the first two times evolution was running, but they
have stopped again. Oh well.
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] evolution problem

2007-11-07 Thread Todd Ness

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 09:16 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
 On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:25 -0600, Ness, Todd wrote:
  This morning, I have been getting quite a few hangs, and “Lost
  connections to backend Exchange process” errors.
 
 There have been a number of bugs fixed in 2.12.1, FWIW.  However, a
 number of known bugs remain.
 
 When I get into a state like this I (a) shut down evo, (b) make sure all
 evolution processes are gone (with kill or pkill or whatever), then (c)
 remove all cached mail from my exchange account:
 
   rm -rf ~/.evolution/exchange ~/.evolution/mail/exchange
 
 if you have other types of accounts (POP or IMAP), as I do, be careful
 to delete just the exchange directories.
 
 After this Evo will be slow to start the first time as it recreates the
 inbox cache, and the first delete will also be slow as it recreates the
 deleted items folder cache.  But, it should solve all your connectivity
 issues.
 
 These days I have to do this every few days, mainly due to this bug:
 
 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478151
 
 which is still happening consistently even on the very latest SVN
 checkout.
 
Well that worked magic for me, things are back to normal, and as an
added bonus this started the filters working on the exchange inbox which
I had given up on getting an answer on.

Thank you Paul
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] evolution problem

2007-11-06 Thread Todd Ness
That was cute, sorry about the apple name showing up everybody it is not a
spam, forgot to change the name in the account field.


On 11/6/07 7:47 AM, Apple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks much for the info, I booted my SLED box and evo 2.6 was connecting
 fine so I figured there would be a good fix.
 I brought the Mac to work today so I am using Entourage I will give that a
 shot tonight when I get home.
 
 
 On 11/6/07 7:16 AM, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:25 -0600, Ness, Todd wrote:
 This morning, I have been getting quite a few hangs, and ³Lost
 connections to backend Exchange process² errors.
 
 There have been a number of bugs fixed in 2.12.1, FWIW.  However, a
 number of known bugs remain.
 
 When I get into a state like this I (a) shut down evo, (b) make sure all
 evolution processes are gone (with kill or pkill or whatever), then (c)
 remove all cached mail from my exchange account:
 
 rm -rf ~/.evolution/exchange ~/.evolution/mail/exchange
 
 if you have other types of accounts (POP or IMAP), as I do, be careful
 to delete just the exchange directories.
 
 After this Evo will be slow to start the first time as it recreates the
 inbox cache, and the first delete will also be slow as it recreates the
 deleted items folder cache.  But, it should solve all your connectivity
 issues.
 
 These days I have to do this every few days, mainly due to this bug:
 
 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478151
 
 which is still happening consistently even on the very latest SVN
 checkout.
 
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Bug

2007-10-27 Thread Todd Ness
What is really interesting since I restarted evo with the debug setting
it has ran all the rest of yesterday into this morning...

On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 08:22 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 00:59 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
  Note that in order to be this bug, the CPU must be
  active while Evo tries to display the message.  If the CPU is idle
  it's something else (you didn't mention either way).
 
 I'm missing something here. How can Evo try to display the message
 when the CPU is idle? When the CPU is idle nobody is doing anything
 except waiting.
 
 poc
 
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
-- 
Todd Ness 
Infrastructure Specialist - Workplace Services Non-Windows ADS
Electronic Data Systems - Integration Engineering - Americas 
Louisville Office+1-303-665-1648
Mobile Phone +1-303-263-2589

Apple Certified System Administrator
Solaris10 Certified System Administrator

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Bug

2007-10-26 Thread Todd Ness


On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 08:23 -0400, Rob Cambra wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I represent a company with 600+ end users.  We are actively seeking
 replacements for many Microsoft technologies such as Outlook/Exchange
 and MS Office.  We are currently testing OpenOffice.org and Evolution
 with select users and the IT Staff.
 
 The biggest complaint we see with Evolution after one month of use is
 the apparent inability of Evolution to properly handle HTML-based
 e-mail with Internet content.  For instance, when a user receives an
 HTML message with graphics and other content fetched from Internet
 locations, the reading pane (lower right pane) freezes.  At this
 point, you can't use the reading pane anymore and Evolution can't be
 closed out.  The only option to return Evolution to normal
 functionality is to log off the user.
 
 We've seen this behavior on Ubuntu 7.10 using Evolution as an Exchange
 client.  This is meant as constructive feedback because we want your
 technology to succeed.
Some things I have found to make evolution a little better.
give it a wrapper script similar to this.
#!/bin/bash

export EVOLUTION_COUNT_TRASH=1
ulimit -n 1024
exec /usr/bin/evolution

the file limit helped a lot.

Also, instead of logging the user out you can open a shell and run:
pkill -f evolution
and then start your client up again.

I have been asking several questions the last 2 weeks about why
evolution freezes as well and have not seen much help.
I would assume that they will need more information such as the version
of evolution you are running.
run this command in a terminal...
rpm -qa|grep evolution 

But, who knows maybe the lack of information will get a response
Good Luck from a guy who is totally invested in non-Windows platforms
making to the desktop
-- 
Todd Ness 
Infrastructure Specialist - Workplace Services Non-Windows ADS

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Bug

2007-10-26 Thread Todd Ness

 Pkill just searches for all processes of the current user which match
 the leading pattern evolution and kills them.
 
 evolution --force-shutdown kills
 evolution
 evolution-data-server
 evolution-exchange
 evolution-alarm-notify
 
 In this case there isnt much of a difference since you probably
 dont have any other application called evolution-* which is
 running but is unrelated to evolution.
 
 Its fairly straightforward to see that using evolution --force-shutdown
 is a much safer bet.
 
 Hope that helps.
 
 Cheers,
 Shreyas
the -f flag matches on the entire command line. yes the
--force-shutdown, any how I just used this option and it has the added
benefit that it restarts evolution for you so a much better plan (I
think)

The real question is why does evolution have so many problems? I restart
10-15 times a day.

First I thought it might be a problem with the exchange option of
synchronize for offline usage I won't try to get the exact wording
because that is what caused evolution to hang for 5 minutes during the
last reply. 
Why did I think this? because most of the time the status bar would get
a Retrieving message 1234123421... and a Downloading for offline
usage... the text may be off some on these I apologize if that is the
case.
So, I turned this off and well it was better for a couple of hours and
then it was back to the same old problems no mail showing up. can't
change to a different folder.
Although I do get a new error dialog more often, Can't refresh folder,
and a few Could not contact server, lost contact with backend
exchange process, but these do not all of these require restarts.
Filters on exchange 2.12.0 seem to have stopped working whereas they
worked on 2.8, but that was much worse about staying connected and
getting new mail.

Then I submit questions and get no answers, but, I have found out that
if I submit a slightly wrong answer for somebody I do generate replies,
and I appreciate Patrick correcting my mistakes, I will not make the
same ones again.

BTW, entourage the MS mail client for Macintosh can sit here next to my
Linux box and run all day, reminders pop up, mail comes in, no problems,
so I am pretty sure that it is not a network issue.

So, sorry to take over your original string with my complaints too, but
I do have a vested interest in getting tools that will enable an
enterprise to use a Linux desktop and not have these sorts of issues.


-- 
Todd Ness 

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Bug

2007-10-26 Thread Todd Ness
You are right again. my personal wrapper was getting executed when I was
running and it of course was not forwarding the command line args to
the /usr/bin/evolution, so at any rate the next 3 times the UI hung I
was just restarting the UI and not the background processes which made
it fail even more frequently and eventually would not start at all.

I have added the DEBUG option as well, and maybe a developer might ask
for something to figure out this problem. 

it is sad to think that MS might make a better exchange mail tool with
the release of the full feature browser client for FireFox in exchange
2007.

 AFAIK --force-shutdown does not restart Evo automatically. I've
 certainly never seen it do this. It justs shuts it down.
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Evo FAQ -- Was Re: Evo 2.10.0 to Evo 2.12.0 on new drive?

2007-10-25 Thread Todd Ness
The first thing that jumps out at me on the documentation link provided
are the evolution 2.6 release notes. Which makes me think that oh this
must be an unmaintained site.

Then if you study carefully you might notice this small FAQ and user
manual for 2.12.

Maybe that ought to be re-done so that what you want people to see/use
is prominent. It is just a suggestion though. I could be one of the rare
Morons that gets distracted by the old version number being 3 times the
size of the current documentation 

On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:15 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:

 I concur.  Very good idea.
 
 Note that I've also recently added a link to the FAQ from the Evolution
 project website, not that anyone ever looks there.
 
 http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/documentation.shtml
 
 Matthew Barnes
 
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
-- 
Todd Ness 

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list