Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 12:34 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 10:32 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 09:57 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > > > Its not a bug , so nothing to be filed. > > > > BugZilla is also used for RFEs (Requests For Enhancement). It's the > > only way to make sure your proposal isn't forgotten. > > For the records, bugzilla.gnome.org has been superseded by > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/issues/ I was only vaguely aware of that, thanks. I expect people will still keep calling it BZ from habit, even though the engine is different. poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 10:32 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 09:57 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > > Its not a bug , so nothing to be filed. > > BugZilla is also used for RFEs (Requests For Enhancement). It's the > only way to make sure your proposal isn't forgotten. For the records, bugzilla.gnome.org has been superseded by https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/issues/ Cheers, andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 09:57 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > Its not a bug , so nothing to be filed. BugZilla is also used for RFEs (Requests For Enhancement). It's the only way to make sure your proposal isn't forgotten. poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 01:06 +0200, Ángel wrote: > On 2018-07-19 at 18:49 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote: > > > I would sort the mail lists by their addresses into > > > different folders so I would know what list i'm reading / talking > > > back to. > > > > > > Folders like: > > > HAM_RADIO_LIST_A > > > HAM_RADIO_LIST_B > > > > > > then filter hamradioli...@hamradio.com then sort into > > > HAM_RADIO_LIST_A > > > folder. > > > > > > > Hiya > > But its not that simple when some can post to several mailing > > lists > > and some crosspost between lists. > > This _shouldn't_ be a problem by itself. > > > You cant filter on list as not all the lists are easily identified > > as > > such. > > I would consider a bug in the list. However, you could still use a > more > complex condition to filter it (check the recipient addresses, or > even > the server that sent it). > > I too, like keeping mails to different lists/groups on separated > folders. As each list should be sending you a copy, filtering on list > would move each one to its folder. > > However, what breaks it are the case where the recipient list has > been > "conveniently" unified, either by the mail provider (eg. Gmail) or a > list server shared by both lists (eg. Exchange). > There is a variant in the case that the mail server sees that you are > explicitly listed as a recipient and skips sending you the list > email, > which is the mailman default, but that can be disabled by the user. > > The problem in such case is that you have *one* email that needs to > be > filed into *two* folders, because you should have received it > *twice*, > but you didn't. ☹ > > > > Filters are boolean , so you cant use "maybe" > > How would that help? If a human secretary asked you "Where do I file > this bill?" and you reply with "Maybe on ", so it > essentially ends up saved into a random one, how do you expect to > find > it later? > > > > > Perhaps one day we will have AI filters > > That will mainly be a marketing label, not as useful as the name > makes > it look like > > > then you could filter on the perceived IQ of the poster, then you > > can filter on dumb, dumber and > > dumber :-), > > but this is actually a funny idea :) > > > Cheers > Hi I'm glad you were able to see it was a humorous statement Its not a bug , so nothing to be filed. Comparing a list of about 50 e-mail addresses against several mailing lists take time, especially as it has to be batched. The filters I have catch about 80% of instances, and only becomes a problem if I read mail on my phone first, so it becomes marked as read. Which means in Evo its not highlited, hence then having to search to find where it went. Nothing to do with lazyness or idleness or not being able to write a filter, its a case of keeping process time and cpu loading low. A habit I've got into running ARM SBCs I hope that clarifies the case -- Best wishes /73 Richard Bown Email : rich...@g8jvm.com HTTP : http://www.g8jvm.com ## Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W QRV 6mtrs 200W, 4mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 300W, 70cms 200W, Microwave 1296MHz 140W, 2320MHz 100W & 10368MHz 5W OS: Linux Mint 19 x86_64 Tara, on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop ## ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:02:06 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: >> Either I fix it straight away, or if someone volunteers to file a new >> bug against evolution, thus it's not forgotten, then it'll be nice >> too. > >Bug 796840 - [Evolution] Colour of string entered in the "Search" field > doesn't change > >https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796840 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/issues/74 ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On 2018-07-19 at 18:49 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote: > > I would sort the mail lists by their addresses into > > different folders so I would know what list i'm reading / talking > > back to. > > > > Folders like: > > HAM_RADIO_LIST_A > > HAM_RADIO_LIST_B > > > > then filter hamradioli...@hamradio.com then sort into > > HAM_RADIO_LIST_A > > folder. > > > Hiya > But its not that simple when some can post to several mailing lists > and some crosspost between lists. This _shouldn't_ be a problem by itself. > You cant filter on list as not all the lists are easily identified as > such. I would consider a bug in the list. However, you could still use a more complex condition to filter it (check the recipient addresses, or even the server that sent it). I too, like keeping mails to different lists/groups on separated folders. As each list should be sending you a copy, filtering on list would move each one to its folder. However, what breaks it are the case where the recipient list has been "conveniently" unified, either by the mail provider (eg. Gmail) or a list server shared by both lists (eg. Exchange). There is a variant in the case that the mail server sees that you are explicitly listed as a recipient and skips sending you the list email, which is the mailman default, but that can be disabled by the user. The problem in such case is that you have *one* email that needs to be filed into *two* folders, because you should have received it *twice*, but you didn't. ☹ > Filters are boolean , so you cant use "maybe" How would that help? If a human secretary asked you "Where do I file this bill?" and you reply with "Maybe on ", so it essentially ends up saved into a random one, how do you expect to find it later? > Perhaps one day we will have AI filters That will mainly be a marketing label, not as useful as the name makes it look like > then you could filter on the perceived IQ of the poster, then you can filter > on dumb, dumber and > dumber :-), but this is actually a funny idea :) Cheers ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > Either I fix it straight away, or if someone volunteers to file a new > bug against evolution, thus it's not forgotten, then it'll be nice > too. Bug 796840 - [Evolution] Colour of string entered in the "Search" field doesn't change https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796840 Ralf [reporter] 2018-07-19 21:54:34 UTC Evolution 3.28.4 Milan asked for a reminder, see https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2018-July/msg00213.html . I would prefer, if collapsing of the "Search" filed would not be enforced, while highlighting would be helpful. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:13 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote: > When you exit a program, why on re launch does EVO remember your last > search? When you exit a program shouldn't that search box cleared > itself out on exit so on next launch you could search for something > else? Instead of displaying what you last searched for, the last time > you launched EVO? Different people have different use cases, workflows, preferences. :) For example, when I restart my web browser it shows the tabs I had opened before closing it. That can either be convenient or unwanted. I have certain folders that by default only display unread mail and I appreciate that this filter view is also applied after restarting Evo. andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
I'd like to ask everyone on this list to please read and follow https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/CodeOfConduct Thank you. andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 21:43 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 18:49 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > > Filters are boolean , so you cant use "maybe" > > Hi, > > a combination of filters and their order could be a quite complex > algorithm. > > Each single filter could be either any of the conditions or all the > conditions of the filter, unless a filter doesn't fit in one way or > the > other, the next filter gets processed. Actually the filter even could > be > able to learn, since you could pipe to one program after the other. A > program able to learn not necessarily has to fit to a definition of > AI, > but if you like, you even could pipe to a AI software. > > FWIW you even could "mis"use bogofilter. Instead of using it to > handle > junk and spam mail, use it to teach it, how to detect mail that is > very > tricky to sort by other filter rules. > > Keep in mind, all software is based on binary code. A bit (binary > digit) > just could be 0 or 1. The Boolean data type has one of two possible > values, but you could use operations of Boolean algebra to process > the > results of several filters. > > > Perhaps one day we will have AI filters , then you could filter on > > the > > perceived IQ of the poster, then you can filter on dumb, dumber and > > dumber > > or you reconsider that the rest of the world does not want to fit to > your idleness. Consider to take the learning curve, to get the skills > to > write the filters you need, to satisfy your needs. Neither AI is > able, > nor Mr. Einstein or Mr. Hawking were able to read your mind. > "Intelligence" doesn't solve issues caused by inaction, you need to > become active in tackling a problem. > > Also consider that preserving existing pigeon holes could be > counterproductive. Instead of filtering by using existing pigeon > holes, > it could be better to restructure the pigeon holes in combination > with > developing filters. > > Regards, > Ralf > > > ___ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list I'm getting more than a bit fed up with a certain person who seem s to get a wasp flew up his lederhosen and sting him, after I post anything. As far as I'm concerned and perhaps others , he had exceeded the conditions for posting on this list. I suggest he puts his Teutonic opinions where the sun doesn't shine and shut up with his petty insults There is a little Norwegian creature which describes his actions Please desist -- Best wishes /73 Richard Bown Email : rich...@g8jvm.com HTTP : http://www.g8jvm.com ## Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W QRV 6mtrs 200W, 4mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 300W, 70cms 200W, Microwave 1296MHz 140W, 2320MHz 100W & 10368MHz 5W OS: Linux Mint 19 x86_64 Tara, on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop ## ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 21:43 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: ...snip... > > Also consider that preserving existing pigeon holes could be > counterproductive. Instead of filtering by using existing pigeon holes, > it could be better to restructure the pigeon holes in combination with > developing filters. > > Regards, > Ralf https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/mail-filters-conditions.html.en from the above page i've found these to be handy... ...snip... Expression: (For programmers only) Match a message according to an expression you write in the Scheme language used to define filters in Evolution. https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/mail-filters.html.en Free Form Expression: (For advanced users only) Combine numerous conditions by using a special syntax. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550796#c10 ...snip... ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 18:49 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > Filters are boolean , so you cant use "maybe" Hi, a combination of filters and their order could be a quite complex algorithm. Each single filter could be either any of the conditions or all the conditions of the filter, unless a filter doesn't fit in one way or the other, the next filter gets processed. Actually the filter even could be able to learn, since you could pipe to one program after the other. A program able to learn not necessarily has to fit to a definition of AI, but if you like, you even could pipe to a AI software. FWIW you even could "mis"use bogofilter. Instead of using it to handle junk and spam mail, use it to teach it, how to detect mail that is very tricky to sort by other filter rules. Keep in mind, all software is based on binary code. A bit (binary digit) just could be 0 or 1. The Boolean data type has one of two possible values, but you could use operations of Boolean algebra to process the results of several filters. > Perhaps one day we will have AI filters , then you could filter on the > perceived IQ of the poster, then you can filter on dumb, dumber and > dumber or you reconsider that the rest of the world does not want to fit to your idleness. Consider to take the learning curve, to get the skills to write the filters you need, to satisfy your needs. Neither AI is able, nor Mr. Einstein or Mr. Hawking were able to read your mind. "Intelligence" doesn't solve issues caused by inaction, you need to become active in tackling a problem. Also consider that preserving existing pigeon holes could be counterproductive. Instead of filtering by using existing pigeon holes, it could be better to restructure the pigeon holes in combination with developing filters. Regards, Ralf ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 11:25 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > > > > I'll give an example > > As you can see from my sig block I'm a Radio Ham, > > I filter personal Ham mail in to one folder, I also subscribe to > > several mailing lists > > > > Oh Richard! That would totally set my OCD off. < Laughing Out Loud> > > Me personally, I would sort the mail lists by their addresses into > different folders so I would know what list i'm reading / talking > back > to. > > Folders like: > > HAM_RADIO_LIST_A > > HAM_RADIO_LIST_B > > > then filter hamradioli...@hamradio.com then sort into > HAM_RADIO_LIST_A > folder. > > Hiya But its not that simple when some can post to several mailing lists and some crosspost between lists. You cant filter on list as not all the lists are easily identified as such. Filters are boolean , so you cant use "maybe" Perhaps one day we will have AI filters , then you could filter on the perceived IQ of the poster, then you can filter on dumb, dumber and dumber :-), even have trump status , but I wont say which end of the spectrum to put that. -- Best wishes /73 Richard Bown Email : rich...@g8jvm.com HTTP : http://www.g8jvm.com ## Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W QRV 6mtrs 200W, 4mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 300W, 70cms 200W, Microwave 1296MHz 140W, 2320MHz 100W & 10368MHz 5W OS: Linux Mint 19 x86_64 Tara, on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop ## ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 11:25 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > > I'll give an example > As you can see from my sig block I'm a Radio Ham, > I filter personal Ham mail in to one folder, I also subscribe to > several mailing lists > Oh Richard! That would totally set my OCD off. < Laughing Out Loud> Me personally, I would sort the mail lists by their addresses into different folders so I would know what list i'm reading / talking back to. Folders like: HAM_RADIO_LIST_A HAM_RADIO_LIST_B then filter hamradioli...@hamradio.com then sort into HAM_RADIO_LIST_A folder. -- Thank you and take care! -- Chris Main Email address: ch...@cwm030.com (Please send all off topic messages to my main address..Thanks) ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
Hi Y'all, I hate to steer this conversation towards a different direction ( back towards my original email) But, I still don't understand why even though I closed Evolution properly using FILE > EXIT. That the next time I loaded up EVO and clicked on my "Archives folder" that in the search bar at the top right of the screen still showed https://imgur.com/a/Oy54OAg When you exit a program, why on re launch does EVO remember your last search? When you exit a program shouldn't that search box cleared itself out on exit so on next launch you could search for something else? Instead of displaying what you last searched for, the last time you launched EVO? I hope that made sense... It took me a while to make sure I worded that paragraph above correctly. Shoo! < Laughing > -- Thank you and take care! -- Chris Main Email address: ch...@cwm030.com (Please send all off topic messages to my main address..Thanks) ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 12:48 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > > ... and even evolution doesn't use that function anymore, it uses > > some CSS foo to workaround the problem, it doesn't work for some > > reason. Either I fix it straight away, or... > > > fixed [1] for 3.29.90+ and 3.28.5+. > Bye, > Milan > > [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/commit/3b9e4b0475 Thanks Milan. poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
Hi, On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > ... and even evolution doesn't use that function anymore, it uses > some CSS foo to workaround the problem, it doesn't work for some > reason. Either I fix it straight away, or... fixed [1] for 3.29.90+ and 3.28.5+. Bye, Milan [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/commit/3b9e4b0475 ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 10:21 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > Hi > > I think better would be to make it apply to all folders, it would > > make > > searching quicker, just then a case on moving down the folder tree. > > Oh I would hate that and I really don't think it would make searching > any quicker and would slow everything down. I have some massive > folders that are not usually searched for anything so aren't cached - > it would frustrate me no end if I happen to have searched for > something > and change folders, for it to then to start downloading everything. > > My folders are also very specific in what they hold - a search in one > folder would just not be applicable to another. And I also quite like > the fact that a search in a folder is sticky - I can look for > something when replying to another email and know the same search > results will be there even if I look for something different in > another > folder. > > Your use case of not knowing where an email might be is exactly why > there is the "Current Account" option in the search. > > P. I'll give an example As you can see from my sig block I'm a Radio Ham, I filter personal Ham mail in to one folder, I also subscribe to several mailing lists which are primarily for Hams. It often occurs that someone who is on my Ham personal list answers or posts in one of the mailing lists, so depending on the order of the filters it will often go in the wrong folder, if a multiple posting is made , ie. the use of CC. I could expand the filters, which would really increase filtering time, I would prefer not to do that. -- Best wishes /73 Richard Bown Email : rich...@g8jvm.com HTTP : http://www.g8jvm.com ## Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W QRV 6mtrs 200W, 4mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 300W, 70cms 200W, Microwave 1296MHz 140W, 2320MHz 100W & 10368MHz 5W OS: Linux Mint 19 x86_64 Tara, on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop ## ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
> Hi > I think better would be to make it apply to all folders, it would make > searching quicker, just then a case on moving down the folder tree. Oh I would hate that and I really don't think it would make searching any quicker and would slow everything down. I have some massive folders that are not usually searched for anything so aren't cached - it would frustrate me no end if I happen to have searched for something and change folders, for it to then to start downloading everything. My folders are also very specific in what they hold - a search in one folder would just not be applicable to another. And I also quite like the fact that a search in a folder is sticky - I can look for something when replying to another email and know the same search results will be there even if I look for something different in another folder. Your use case of not knowing where an email might be is exactly why there is the "Current Account" option in the search. P. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 08:31 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 19:13 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > > I think better would be to make it apply to all folders, it would > > make searching quicker, just then a case on moving down the folder > > tree. > > Hi, > there is that Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences->General tab- > >Message > Display section->Apply the same view settings to all folders option, > but I'm not sure whether it means also the search itself. > > There are few/many users using different searches in different > folders > at the same time though, thus, I'd say, both solutions have their > pros > and cons. > Bye, > Milan > Hi Milan What I meant was when you use the search using the folder option , to have the same search parameter if you change folder. The current search is ignored if you change folder, unless you select current account, and then you get everything that meets the search parameter displayed. I have over 20 folders, so its nice to be able to search folder by folder with same search parameter. If I read a mail on my phone, its marked as read, and sometimes depending on filtering the mail could go into several different folders, when I process it on the laptop. Just a nice feature, but only worth adding if you are reworking the search facilities, nothing urgent about it. Thanks -- Best wishes /73 Richard Bown Email : rich...@g8jvm.com HTTP : http://www.g8jvm.com ## Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W QRV 6mtrs 200W, 4mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 300W, 70cms 200W, Microwave 1296MHz 140W, 2320MHz 100W & 10368MHz 5W OS: Linux Mint 19 x86_64 Tara, on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop ## ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 19:13 +0100, Richard Bown wrote: > I think better would be to make it apply to all folders, it would > make searching quicker, just then a case on moving down the folder > tree. Hi, there is that Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences->General tab->Message Display section->Apply the same view settings to all folders option, but I'm not sure whether it means also the search itself. There are few/many users using different searches in different folders at the same time though, thus, I'd say, both solutions have their pros and cons. Bye, Milan ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 20:00 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > It doesn't for me and I'm using Adwaita which I thought was the > > default. > > Hi, > it is this gtk+ bug: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656461 > > and even evolution doesn't use that function anymore, it uses some > CSS > foo to workaround the problem, it doesn't work for some reason. > Either I fix it straight away, or if someone volunteers to file a new > bug against evolution, thus it's not forgotten, then it'll be nice > too. > > I think a nice long-term solution would be to show the search bar > only > if it's searching and "collapse" it when not. That would give cleaner > interface as well. Just an idea. > Bye, > Milan > > ___ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list Hi I think better would be to make it apply to all folders, it would make searching quicker, just then a case on moving down the folder tree. it would be the same behaviour as Claws mail. -- Best wishes /73 Richard Bown Email : rich...@g8jvm.com HTTP : http://www.g8jvm.com ## Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W QRV 6mtrs 200W, 4mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 300W, 70cms 200W, Microwave 1296MHz 140W, 2320MHz 100W & 10368MHz 5W OS: Linux Mint 19 x86_64 Tara, on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop ## ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > It doesn't for me and I'm using Adwaita which I thought was the > default. Hi, it is this gtk+ bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656461 and even evolution doesn't use that function anymore, it uses some CSS foo to workaround the problem, it doesn't work for some reason. Either I fix it straight away, or if someone volunteers to file a new bug against evolution, thus it's not forgotten, then it'll be nice too. I think a nice long-term solution would be to show the search bar only if it's searching and "collapse" it when not. That would give cleaner interface as well. Just an idea. Bye, Milan ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:51 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > > That's already the case for a string entered in the "Search" > > > > field. > > > > > > That might depend on the used theme > > > > True. It works for the standard default GNOME theme though. > > It doesn't for me and I'm using Adwaita which I thought was the > default. Ditto here; I've never installed a theme in my life. I'm using stock Ubuntu 18.04 (and Ubuntu GNOME before Ubuntu dumped Unity; I've never used Unity) and I've never seen the search bar change color. This is Evolution 3.28.1. For some reason my email server is greylisted on gnome.org so most of you probably won't see this email. C'est le guerre. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:51 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > That's already the case for a string entered in the "Search" > > > field. > > > > That might depend on the used theme > > True. It works for the standard default GNOME theme though. It doesn't for me and I'm using Adwaita which I thought was the default. P. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:51 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > > That's already the case for a string entered in the "Search" > > > field. > > > > That might depend on the used theme > > True. It works for the standard default GNOME theme though. I use Evo under KDE and I'm only now noticing that the background doesn't change, though I'm certain that at one time it did work as expected. No doubt something changed in the default theme. As the one who first suggested the feature years ago it's slightly embarrassing :- ). poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > > That's already the case for a string entered in the "Search" > > field. > > That might depend on the used theme True. It works for the standard default GNOME theme though. > , since for > $ pacman -Q evolution > evolution 3.28.4-1 > and the theme I'm using, this doesn't happen. Anyone is free to use custom themes that limit user experience. :) andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 14:15 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 07:52 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > I'd recommend highlighting the search bar when it's actively > > restricting your view of the folder contents > > That's already the case for a string entered in the "Search" field. That might depend on the used theme, since for $ pacman -Q evolution evolution 3.28.4-1 and the theme I'm using, this doesn't happen. It's a customized Arc theme: $ grep gtk-theme .config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini gtk-theme-name=Arc-RM-Cornflower If it should work when using a default GNOME theme such as Adwaita, then it's not a solution for everybody who wants to get a theme for professional usage, that might not be as good as themes are for air planes or military gear, but at least closer to such a air plane and military gear approach, than to the ridiculous, amateurish GNOME themes. Actually I replaced Adwaita with an Arc theme fixed by myself, because Adwaita became a PITA. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 21:51 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote: > Okay, Im totally freaking out over here That's usually the state when not to send emails and instead sleep for one night. > But I want to know where did everything go? > > And please tell me I can get all of my files back? Please start reading user documentation. https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/mail-cannot-see.html Thanks, andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 20:08 -0700, Douglas Summers wrote: > > Better to be an idiot who didn't lose his emails, right? :) > Believe me - we've all been there. > HAHAHA! Agreed! :P Thank you and take care! -- Chris Main Email address: ch...@cwm030.com (Please send all off topic messages to my main address..Thanks) ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 21:57 -0500, Christopher Marlow wrote: > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA never mind i'm an idiot! > > I forgot I had something typed in the search bar, I was looking for a > certain email sent to my @aol.com address and thats why I could only > see 4 emails > > As soon as I eraced @AOL.COM > > and hit enter > > everything came back > > shoo! I got really scared there for a minute. > > > > Thank you and take care! > -- Chris > > Main Email address: ch...@cwm030.com > (Please send all off topic messages to my main address..Thanks) > ___ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list Better to be an idiot who didn't lose his emails, right? :) Believe me - we've all been there. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] all of my archived emails dissapeared
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA never mind i'm an idiot! I forgot I had something typed in the search bar, I was looking for a certain email sent to my @aol.com address and thats why I could only see 4 emails As soon as I eraced @AOL.COM and hit enter everything came back shoo! I got really scared there for a minute. Thank you and take care! -- Chris Main Email address: ch...@cwm030.com (Please send all off topic messages to my main address..Thanks) ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
