[ewg] Re: [PATCH install.pl] tgt

2008-08-27 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky 
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:45 +0300, Doron Shoham wrote:
 Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
  Should it be installed on SLES10/RHEL5 only?
 
 Yes, including their updates (RH5.1, RH5.2, SLES10 sp1 and SLES10 sp2).
 
  
  Another question: why do you need 'stgt' package in the install.pl?
  Currently,
  it can't be selected because it is not in the list of @user_packages and
  if it was
  added to the ofed.conf then it will add 'tgt-generic' to the list of
  selected packages
  instead...
 
 The reason for using 'stgt' package was similar to the idea in iscsi.
 SUSE named stgt as tgt and redhat named it scsi-target-utils.
 My idea was that users will be able to add stgt in the conf
 file with a generic name such as 'stgt'.
 That why I think it would be better to put 'stgt' in the @user_packages 
 (instead of 'tgt').
 

I see that 'tgt-generic' do that job.

1240 'tgt-generic' =
1241 { name = ($distro eq 'SuSE') ? 'tgt': 'scsi-target-utils', 
parent = tgt-generic,
1242 selected = 0, installed = 0, rpm_exist = 0, rpm_exist32 = 
0,

So, stgt can be removed and only 'tgt-generic' should be in the list of 
@user_packages.

Regards,
Vladimir
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

[ewg] Re: [PATCH install.pl] tgt

2008-08-27 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky 
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 11:46 +0300, Doron Shoham wrote:
 Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
  On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:45 +0300, Doron Shoham wrote:
  Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
  Should it be installed on SLES10/RHEL5 only?
  Yes, including their updates (RH5.1, RH5.2, SLES10 sp1 and SLES10 sp2).
 
  Another question: why do you need 'stgt' package in the install.pl?
  Currently,
  it can't be selected because it is not in the list of @user_packages and
  if it was
  added to the ofed.conf then it will add 'tgt-generic' to the list of
  selected packages
  instead...
  The reason for using 'stgt' package was similar to the idea in iscsi.
  SUSE named stgt as tgt and redhat named it scsi-target-utils.
  My idea was that users will be able to add stgt in the conf
  file with a generic name such as 'stgt'.
  That why I think it would be better to put 'stgt' in the @user_packages 
  (instead of 'tgt').
 
  
  I see that 'tgt-generic' do that job.
  
  1240 'tgt-generic' =
  1241 { name = ($distro eq 'SuSE') ? 'tgt': 
  'scsi-target-utils', parent = tgt-generic,
  1242 selected = 0, installed = 0, rpm_exist = 0, rpm_exist32 
  = 0,
  
  So, stgt can be removed and only 'tgt-generic' should be in the list of 
  @user_packages.
 ok.
 just to make sure, now it stgt will be installed with tgt-generic=y in conf 
 file?
 is there a way to change it to stgt=y?

Probably I missed something.
Please correct me if I am wrong:

1. There is one 'tgt-generic' source RPM.
2. After 'rpmbuild --rebuild ... tgt-generic.src.rpm' two binary RPMs
being created: 'tgt' and 'scsi-target-utils' on both SuSE and RedHat.
3. On SuSE you want to install the 'tgt' RPM.
   On RedHat - 'scsi-target-utils' RPM.

So, where stgt comes from?

Now, if tgt-generic=y in conf file then 'tgt' RPM will be installed on
SuSE and 'scsi-target-utils' will be installed on RedHat.

- Vladimir


___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

[ewg] Re: [PATCH install.pl] tgt

2008-08-26 Thread Doron Shoham 
Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
 On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:45 +0300, Doron Shoham wrote:
 Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
 Should it be installed on SLES10/RHEL5 only?
 Yes, including their updates (RH5.1, RH5.2, SLES10 sp1 and SLES10 sp2).

 Another question: why do you need 'stgt' package in the install.pl?
 Currently,
 it can't be selected because it is not in the list of @user_packages and
 if it was
 added to the ofed.conf then it will add 'tgt-generic' to the list of
 selected packages
 instead...
 The reason for using 'stgt' package was similar to the idea in iscsi.
 SUSE named stgt as tgt and redhat named it scsi-target-utils.
 My idea was that users will be able to add stgt in the conf
 file with a generic name such as 'stgt'.
 That why I think it would be better to put 'stgt' in the @user_packages 
 (instead of 'tgt').

 
 I see that 'tgt-generic' do that job.
 
 1240 'tgt-generic' =
 1241 { name = ($distro eq 'SuSE') ? 'tgt': 'scsi-target-utils', 
 parent = tgt-generic,
 1242 selected = 0, installed = 0, rpm_exist = 0, rpm_exist32 
 = 0,
 
 So, stgt can be removed and only 'tgt-generic' should be in the list of 
 @user_packages.
ok.
just to make sure, now it stgt will be installed with tgt-generic=y in conf 
file?
is there a way to change it to stgt=y?

 
 Regards,
 Vladimir

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

[ewg] Re: [PATCH install.pl] tgt

2008-08-26 Thread Doron Shoham 
  Probably I missed something.
 Please correct me if I am wrong:
 
 1. There is one 'tgt-generic' source RPM.
 2. After 'rpmbuild --rebuild ... tgt-generic.src.rpm' two binary RPMs
 being created: 'tgt' and 'scsi-target-utils' on both SuSE and RedHat.
 3. On SuSE you want to install the 'tgt' RPM.
On RedHat - 'scsi-target-utils' RPM.
 
 So, where stgt comes from?
 
 Now, if tgt-generic=y in conf file then 'tgt' RPM will be installed on
 SuSE and 'scsi-target-utils' will be installed on RedHat.
 
 - Vladimir
 

You are correct.
I was confused by something else.

Thanks,
Doron

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg