Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree
Hello Tziporet, The problem was because of the last check in of small UDP performance patch. It changed the receiving path completely. And I only got less than one day to merge/test the patch with that patch on both intel and PPC platform. The patch was in good/stable shape before this patch. It has passed stress test for both intel and PPC platform. I have tested the whole night of the new patch yesterday night. It works well and passes the stress test without any problem. Regarding Eli's comments, I have sent out. I am sorry for the minor mistake because of the rushing, but I don't see any risk from my test results. Please reconsider this patch to be in OFED-1.3. thanks Shirley Tziporet Koren tziporet To @dev.mell [EMAIL PROTECTED] anox.co.i cc lEli Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sent by: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org, OpenFabrics general-b General [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject sts.openf [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] abrics.or IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 g ofed-1.3-git tree 02/05/08 08:19 AM Shirley Ma wrote: I found one one line was out side for loop when merging this patch with current git-tree. This caused UD_POST_RCV_COUNT = 16 wrong. I have fixed it. This is the updated patch. Thanks Shirley Hi Shirley, Its seems to me that 4K MTU patch is not cooked enough for RC4. I appreciate your hard work to push it but so many changes, possible leaks and not enough time for review and testing means too high risk for now Tziporet ___ general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general inline: graycol.gifinline: pic23340.gifinline: ecblank.gif___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree
Hello Tziporet, On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 18:56 +0200, Tziporet Koren wrote: Shirley Ma wrote: Hello Tziporet, The problem was because of the last check in of small UDP performance patch. It changed the receiving path completely. And I only got less than one day to merge/test the patch with that patch on both intel and PPC platform. The patch was in good/stable shape before this patch. It has passed stress test for both intel and PPC platform. I have tested the whole night of the new patch yesterday night. It works well and passes the stress test without any problem. Which OS have you tested? 2.6.24 kernel, and I am going to test SLES10SP2 kernel. It has passed stress test the whole night for 2K MTU test suites. Regarding Eli's comments, I have sent out. I am sorry for the minor mistake because of the rushing, but I don't see any risk from my test results. Please reconsider this patch to be in OFED-1.3. OK - we will do this - we will run one set of our regression with your patch now, and also check that it pass compilation on all kernels. If both will be OK we will take it. I cross fingers for you :-) ziporet Appreciate you, Vlad and Eli's help here! There is one line change needed for backporting ++priv-stats and ++dev-stats. I didn't create the backport patch for this. thanks Shirley ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] [UPDATE][PATCH] IPoIB-UD 4K MTU patch against 2.6.24 ofed-1.3-git tree
Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/05/2008 12:07:28 PM: Please test on RHREL 5 too What are your stress tests? Ok. The stress test is similar to netperf/netserver. But it's bi-directional multiple streams. I have stressed the stream to 150, duplex running overnight. Please send this backport patch and specify to which kernels its needed Tziporet Ok. It might be out tonight. Thanks Shirley___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
