RE: [ewg] Re: ofed-1.4.1 rc5 and sles10sp2

[Rupert Dance]

UNH-IOL reconfigured its cluster with RC5 and experienced the same type of
problems. We can't load drivers and there is no IB connectivity. UNH-IOL is
reverting back to RC4

-Original Message-
From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Steve Wise
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51 PM
To: Brian J. Murrell
Cc: OpenFabrics EWG
Subject: Re: [ewg] Re: ofed-1.4.1 rc5 and sles10sp2

Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 15:52 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
>   
>> I see the same behavior with RC5 on RH5.2/i386.
>>
>> I did some reverting, and it appears this commit is the culprit:
>>
>> --
>> commit 9e1a4dd600347472829859849168fd3a6f7c597c
>> Author: Jeff Becker 
>> Date:   Sun May 10 20:21:12 2009 -0700
>>
>> NFSRDMA: remove dependence of backport ib_core on nfs: fixes Bug 1596
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Becker 
>> 
>> 
>
> So is this just a regression when trying to use NFSRDMA?  If I don't 
> build NFSRDMA, will RC5 still be a problem for me or will the core I/B 
> stack be unaffected?
>
>   

I couldn't load ib_core.  IMO we need a recall of RC5.


Steve.




___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Re: [ewg] Re: ofed-1.4.1 rc5 and sles10sp2

[Steve Wise]

Brian J. Murrell wrote:

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 15:52 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
  

I see the same behavior with RC5 on RH5.2/i386.

I did some reverting, and it appears this commit is the culprit:

--
commit 9e1a4dd600347472829859849168fd3a6f7c597c
Author: Jeff Becker 
Date:   Sun May 10 20:21:12 2009 -0700

NFSRDMA: remove dependence of backport ib_core on nfs: fixes Bug 1596
Signed-off-by: Jeff Becker 




So is this just a regression when trying to use NFSRDMA?  If I don't
build NFSRDMA, will RC5 still be a problem for me or will the core I/B
stack be unaffected?

  


I couldn't load ib_core.  IMO we need a recall of RC5.


Steve.




___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Re: [ewg] Re: ofed-1.4.1 rc5 and sles10sp2

[Brian J. Murrell]

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 15:52 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
> I see the same behavior with RC5 on RH5.2/i386.
> 
> I did some reverting, and it appears this commit is the culprit:
> 
> --
> commit 9e1a4dd600347472829859849168fd3a6f7c597c
> Author: Jeff Becker 
> Date:   Sun May 10 20:21:12 2009 -0700
> 
> NFSRDMA: remove dependence of backport ib_core on nfs: fixes Bug 1596
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Becker 
> 

So is this just a regression when trying to use NFSRDMA?  If I don't
build NFSRDMA, will RC5 still be a problem for me or will the core I/B
stack be unaffected?

b.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg