RE: properties of a message

[Bob Sadler]

I'm gonna take a guess at this.  But doesn't the TO line says it's TO midship.com?



Thanks,

Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: properties of a message


Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 [213.216.133.248])
by logistics.midship.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2653.13)
id GT7LLFP3; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:06:22 -0500
Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20])
by overmars.ex.lostwax.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23833
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <5455228.1016665410653.JavaMail.weblogic@adams>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: text msg
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Does anyone know how this message would have reached my server and who it
was from.  We have public folder at are office and people have send as
rights for the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems like person
who sent this is not even in our company. If anyone can explain how this
message came to our server I would appreciate it.

Thanks
Rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: properties of a message

[Chris Scharff]

It was sent from "Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20])" through "from
overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 [213.216.133.248])" to
"logistics.midship.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2653.13)". How it was done is described in RFC2821. It's a
particularly good read, I highly recommend it.[1]


[1] Its predecessor was mandatory reading for my PFY their first day on the
job.[2]
[2] When I had PFY.


Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP  512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer   MessageOne


> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:29 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: properties of a message
> 
> 
> Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 
> [213.216.133.248]) by logistics.midship.com with SMTP 
> (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
>   id GT7LLFP3; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:06:22 -0500
> Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20])
>   by overmars.ex.lostwax.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23833
>   for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <5455228.1016665410653.JavaMail.weblogic@adams>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: text msg
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> Does anyone know how this message would have reached my 
> server and who it was from.  We have public folder at are 
> office and people have send as rights for the email address 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems like person who sent this is 
> not even in our company. If anyone can explain how this 
> message came to our server I would appreciate it.
> 
> Thanks
> Rich
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Lookiing for Document

[Chris Scharff]

Looking through the whitepapers on the MS website it strikes me that it
might be easier to compare the similarities rather than the differences. :)

Do either of these help?
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/whyupgrade/default.as
p
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/features/default.asp


Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP  512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer   MessageOne


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document
> 
> 
> Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to 
> Windows NT4 SVR? I have been looking to no avail . . .
> 
> "It is the province of knowledge to speak,
> and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen".
> Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: exchange 2000 server specific options

[Davis,Scott]

Take for example "Joe Contractor".
Joe is contracted in your organization for 3 months. Joe needs a user
account to gain access to file shares in order to perform his tasks. Joe
have a mailbox at his consulting firm and he would like all
correspondence to be sent to it.
You can mail-enable Joe Contractor and use the SMTP address of his
choice. This way he can be included in the GAL.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options


Thanks. I understand all that.

I can see the benefits of a mail-enabled contact. But the article still
does not answer what a mail-enabled user is good for (compared to
mailbox-enabled user). Just for the sake of mail-enabling?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options


Q233207



-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options


Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for
e-mail address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox?

I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of
this feature.


-Original Message-
From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: exchange 2000 server specific options


Hi,

I think you have to recreate mailbox enabled user, there is no way to
convert the mail enabled user to mail box enabled user.  Once you get
the mail box enabled user, then you will get deilivery options to set
mail forwarding.

> Hi all,
> 
> i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to 
> mailbox enabled user. From Active directory users & computers when i 
> right mouse click and go to the property page for the contact in 
> exchange general i don't see deliveray options...to set mail 
> forwarding. Can anyone help me how to overcome this problem???

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Upgrading to Enterprise 5.5

[grepbold]

You can't buy 5.5 Enterprise anymore, you have to buy 2000 and you will
get the 5.5 Enterprise cd for around $23 (you have to request it). the
upgrade is just a reinstall and reapplication of service pack. (15
minutes).

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

properties of a message

[Tener, Richard]

Received: from overmars.ex.lostwax.com (213.216.133.248 [213.216.133.248])
by logistics.midship.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2653.13)
id GT7LLFP3; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 18:06:22 -0500
Received: from adams (adams [192.168.4.20])
by overmars.ex.lostwax.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA23833
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:26 GMT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <5455228.1016665410653.JavaMail.weblogic@adams>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: text msg
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Does anyone know how this message would have reached my server and who it
was from.  We have public folder at are office and people have send as
rights for the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems like person
who sent this is not even in our company. If anyone can explain how this
message came to our server I would appreciate it.

Thanks
Rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disaster Recovery Center

[Louis Joyce]

Or Richard Tener.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 15:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Center


I would avoid Arthur Anderson.

-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Center


We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some
questions.

Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or
do you host your own?

Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some
that I should look into?

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disaster Recovery Center

[Andy David]

And Loni.


-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster Recovery Center


I would avoid Arthur Anderson.

-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Center


We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some
questions.

Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or
do you host your own?

Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some
that I should look into?

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disaster Recovery Center

[Doug Hampshire]

I would avoid Arthur Anderson.

-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disaster Recovery Center


We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some
questions.

Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or
do you host your own?

Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some
that I should look into?

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: C2C Compression Utility

[John Matteson]

I have the product running on my server at this time. For the most part it
works okay, however, watch out for the BATCH PROCESSING functionality. It
can be a real killer. I've also had C2C eat a bunch of attachments that were
previously zipped outside of Exchange. I have reservations, but management
mandated it's use.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones



-Original Message-
From: Louanne Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: C2C Compression Utility


Does anyone have experience with the C2C Compression Utility for Exchange?
Are there any other compression utilites that are better?

Louanne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Disaster Recovery Center

[Shields, Anthony]

We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some questions.

Does anyone use a Disaster Recovery center for their offsite requirements or do you 
host your own?

Do you know of any companies from experience I should stay away from or some that I 
should look into?

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lookiing for Document

[missy koslosky]

This information should be readily available on MS's web site.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document


ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess
why
I need it without me saying another word . . .
 The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . .

- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: Lookiing for Document


> What is there to compare?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document
>
>
> Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows
NT4
> SVR?
> I have been looking to no avail . . .
>
> "It is the province of knowledge to speak,
> and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen".
> Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --


> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
>
>


==
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lookiing for Document

[Chris Haaker]

ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess why
I need it without me saying another word . . .
 The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . .

- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: Lookiing for Document


> What is there to compare?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document
>
>
> Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4
> SVR?
> I have been looking to no avail . . .
>
> "It is the province of knowledge to speak,
> and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen".
> Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --

> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
>
>

==
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: share Outlook information betwen OLXP and 2000

[Ray Zorz]

go to www.slipstick.com.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jean-Francois
Bourdeau
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: share Outlook information betwen OLXP and 2000


Hi

NetFolder does not exist anymore for OL XP (sharing of OL Data with somekind
of invisible eMail going from one OL to the other, syncrhonising data )

A PST cannont be access at the same time by 2 computers.

Who Could I share information between 2 outlook without an exchange server

Thanks

JF



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Lookiing for Document

[Andy David]

What is there to compare?


-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document


Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4
SVR?
I have been looking to no avail . . .

"It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen".
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: How Organizational Forms Work?

[Jerzy Setmajer]

Well,  first - do not give disgruntled employees permission to post
Organizational forms. Second, password protect all the forms before you
post.  Keep the password list safe so you can "unlock" the form.
Usually, the developers want to password protect their own forms - don't
let them.  You need to be in control.
The password protection on forms is not the greatest, but it keeps most of
the home grown "wanna be's" at bay.  And if you happen to run into a REAL
hacker and he has access to your network, Outlook forms will be the least
of your problems.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: Lookiing for Document

[Chris Haaker]

Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4
SVR?
I have been looking to no avail . . .

"It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen".
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: exchange 2000 server specific options

[Andrey Fyodorov]

Thanks. I understand all that.

I can see the benefits of a mail-enabled contact. But the article still does
not answer what a mail-enabled user is good for (compared to mailbox-enabled
user). Just for the sake of mail-enabling?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options


Q233207



-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options


Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail
address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox?

I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of
this feature.


-Original Message-
From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: exchange 2000 server specific options


Hi,

I think you have to recreate mailbox enabled user, there is no way to
convert the mail enabled user to mail box enabled user.  Once you get the
mail box enabled user, then you will get deilivery options to set mail
forwarding.

> Hi all,
> 
> i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to mailbox
> enabled user. From Active directory users & computers when i right mouse
> click and go to the property page for the contact in exchange general i
> don't see deliveray options...to set mail forwarding. Can anyone help me
> how to overcome this problem???

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

share Outlook information betwen OLXP and 2000

[Jean-Francois Bourdeau]

Hi

NetFolder does not exist anymore for OL XP (sharing of OL Data with somekind
of invisible eMail going from one OL to the other, syncrhonising data )

A PST cannont be access at the same time by 2 computers.

Who Could I share information between 2 outlook without an exchange server

Thanks

JF



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST

[East, Bill]

Jumping Jiminey. I guess I am.

It's just that Dupler fellow. I get all excited.

-- 
be - MOS



"This is Vergon 6." -Professor 
 "Bah." -Amy 
 "It's a sunny little doomed planet, inhabited by a number of frisky little
doomed animals." -Professor 


> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
> 
> 
> A little behind on your reading Bill?
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, it works well.  That was never the point.  But, just 
> like a MAPI 
> > session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse 
> mode on OWA.
> > 
> I'm puzzled by this approach, Craig.
> 
> Let's say you're at an airport kiosk. You're going to 
> download the synch
> file, then what? Copy it to a floppy? What if it's more that 
> 1.44MB? What if
> the kiosk doesn't have a floppy drive? If you're using a PDA, 
> how do you
> transfer the file to there?
> 
> OTOH, let's say you're hooked into a WLAN in the Executive 
> Lounge from your
> own laptop or PDA. You can then fire up your VPN software, 
> connect into your
> LAN and synch using the copy of Outlook on your PC. If you don't use
> Outlook, as many others have pointed out, you can use an IMAP client.
> 
> Synchronization to an OST presumes that you have Outlook 
> installed, so why
> re-create the wheel? OWA was built to be run from any browser 
> anywhere (I
> can even convince Opera to load it if I work at it), but like 
> most Web-based
> services, presumes a connection for the duration of the session.
> 
> 
> > I don't get it.  Why are you guys arguing in favor of keeping
> > a small and
> > extremely useful feature out of the product?  Is it a "we're 
> > tough, we can
> > take it" sort of thing, or what?
> > 
> 
> Implementation of this isn't trivial, and there already exist multiple
> better ways to do what you want. So why would Microsoft spend money
> developing another one?
> 
> > Or maybe it is that you've bought into the view that small 
> > machines should
> > only be used as companions to "real" machines.
> 
> Well, no. If you have an IMAP/MAPI client and a Web browser 
> on your handheld
> you're in good shape. But your Web browser sucks as a 
> mailtool, so why not
> use the IMAP/MAPI client?
> 
> >   Sheesh, I 
> > thought that
> > attitude died back in the 80's when the mainframe crowd tried 
> > to convince
> > everyone that OV, HP Desk and All-In-1 were the "real" 
> > workgroup messaging
> > systems, and that LAN mail should be relegated to simple 
> departmental
> > messaging only tasks.
> > 
> > It's amazing.  The PC guys have grown up to become the 
> > dinosaurs that they
> > displaced.
> > 
> 
> I resent that implication. I have not become a PDP/11.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST

[Mellott, Bill]

Umm yes behind on my reading..

OK 6GB drive for your Ipaq hey? well I have one of those users.
Yup he got the 3850...It still was not enough for him.
So he bought the dual slot expansion sleeve...then goes out and gets himself
one of the PCMCIA mircodrives + the modem to hook to his cell
phone..Downloads about every piece of software out there for the thing.
And has the lovely need to call me even on the weekend about it at all
hours..nice guy..too much coffee ;-)
Now I get a call about every two day's or so about syncing his 3850 to the
system.
at this point all Ive got to give him is the OWA.

SO...Hey I tried reading all the threads...My brain is still missing
something.
Is there really a way to sync thru OWA?

I get the pop/smtp/VPN thing...just not using it yet/at all.

Yes I'm gullible...humor me... think of it as flipper boy isn't all there
today...
There isn't a way to sync via OWA right?

Bill
"Ive forgotten more then I'll ever know"

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST


I'm waiting for the iPaq with 6GB drive so I can get rid of my laptop.

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST


I'm waiting to be able to synchronize my 32-terabyte PST to my PDA.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST


Well, they're now in "bug-fix mode" as you've read, so there's a general
moratorium on desired feature updates as well as the more numerous "you want
this--trust us" stuff.  Probably worth the wait

-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST


Yes, it works well.  That was never the point.  But, just like a MAPI
session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse mode on OWA.  

I don't get it.  Why are you guys arguing in favor of keeping a small and
extremely useful feature out of the product?  Is it a "we're tough, we can
take it" sort of thing, or what?

Or maybe it is that you've bought into the view that small machines should
only be used as companions to "real" machines.   Sheesh, I thought that
attitude died back in the 80's when the mainframe crowd tried to convince
everyone that OV, HP Desk and All-In-1 were the "real" workgroup messaging
systems, and that LAN mail should be relegated to simple departmental
messaging only tasks.

It's amazing.  The PC guys have grown up to become the dinosaurs that they
displaced.



-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST


Actually, although it is quite small and requires you to move around the
screen a lot, I just did what Serdar suggested.  Threw an Ethernet card in
my iPaq and went straight to the OWA...logged in and it worked like a charm!

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST



What I'm trying to say is that currently the technology is available to
"access my data when I am not at my desk".  As long as you have a wireless
modem in your PDA, you can 

A. Browse to OWA.
B. Connect directly to Exchange via POP3.

So, from the PDAs you can access your data.  If they already have IMAP, then
you can pick and choose what you want to download to your PDA when you're on
the road.  Then when you're back on the network you can simply synch your
PDA again.

If you have your OWA available on the Internet, then you can "access your
data" even from a kiosk in an airport.

All I'm saying is there is no need to force a web front end to synchronize
with an offline copy of your mailbox when you can directly connect to the
back-end database.  


S.

PS: These are my personal views.  If you want the official position of Kmart
on the subject, you'll need to contact our Corporate Communications, I am
not authorized to talk about that.  What they think at Wal-mart or Target or
any other company doesn't have any relevance to the discussion here.  

Countering the argument by saying "you're wrong because your company is in
bad shape" is quite childish.




-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with O

RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail

[Allan Johnson]

Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message

FYI, I am not nor will I ever be confused with the Official "Thread
Monitor".  I just happen to remember this thread for the reprimand
delivered, not a soda spurt but a pretty good chuckle.

"Doctor, I have a pain.
Where?
Well, I'm not going to tell you except that it's above my waist and below my
neck.





-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail


Hold on. Let me get the Thread Monitor on the phone.


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail
Importance: High


Good morning,

I wasn't here yesterday.  Could you please point me to the thread that
talked about this?

Thanks.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail


Would you mind explaining this a bit further?  I don't have a PIX for our
firewall which was what was suggested yesterday when I posted about this.

Thanks in advance for any information.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail


Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. 
Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems.


>Yes we sit behind a firewall..  Please share any information you can.
>
>I would greatly appreciate it.
>
>Regards,
>
>Mike Mitchell
>Systems eMAIL Administrator
>Alverno Information Services
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail
>
>
>Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mitchell Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM
>Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail
>
>
> > Good morning,
> >
> > Outlook 98.  Exchange 5.5 sp4.
> >
> > I have a user getting the following errors.  I do not know where to
>begin
>to
> > look.
> >
> > This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange 
> > server. PLEASE HELP.
> >
> > Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com
> > Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com
> > Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.0.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message
> > . character on a line by itself.
> > .241.49])
> >
> > 250-AUTH
> > 250 SIZE 512
> > HELP
> > 250-SAML
> > 250-SEND
> > 250-SOML
> > 250-TURN
> > 250-XADR
> > 250-XSTA
> > 250-ETRN
> > 250-XGEN
> > 250-RELAY
> > 250 SIZE 2560
> > sent from the internet.
> >  transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk
> > 220  e-mail sent from the internet.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mike Mitchell
> > Systems eMAIL Administrator
> > Alverno Information Services
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto

RE: exchange 2000 server specific options

[Andy David]

Q233207



-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 server specific options


Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail
address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox?

I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of
this feature.


-Original Message-
From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: exchange 2000 server specific options


Hi,

I think you have to recreate mailbox enabled user, there is no way to
convert the mail enabled user to mail box enabled user.  Once you get the
mail box enabled user, then you will get deilivery options to set mail
forwarding.

> Hi all,
> 
> i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to mailbox
> enabled user. From Active directory users & computers when i right mouse
> click and go to the property page for the contact in exchange general i
> don't see deliveray options...to set mail forwarding. Can anyone help me
> how to overcome this problem???

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail

[Andy David]

Hold on. Let me get the Thread Monitor on the phone.


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail
Importance: High


Good morning,

I wasn't here yesterday.  Could you please point me to the thread that
talked about this?

Thanks.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail


Would you mind explaining this a bit further?  I don't have a PIX for our
firewall which was what was suggested yesterday when I posted about this.

Thanks in advance for any information.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail


Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. 
Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems.


>Yes we sit behind a firewall..  Please share any information you can.
>
>I would greatly appreciate it.
>
>Regards,
>
>Mike Mitchell
>Systems eMAIL Administrator
>Alverno Information Services
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail
>
>
>Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mitchell Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM
>Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail
>
>
> > Good morning,
> >
> > Outlook 98.  Exchange 5.5 sp4.
> >
> > I have a user getting the following errors.  I do not know where to
>begin
>to
> > look.
> >
> > This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange 
> > server. PLEASE HELP.
> >
> > Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com
> > Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com
> > Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.0.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message
> > . character on a line by itself.
> > .241.49])
> >
> > 250-AUTH
> > 250 SIZE 512
> > HELP
> > 250-SAML
> > 250-SEND
> > 250-SOML
> > 250-TURN
> > 250-XADR
> > 250-XSTA
> > 250-ETRN
> > 250-XGEN
> > 250-RELAY
> > 250 SIZE 2560
> > sent from the internet.
> >  transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk
> > 220  e-mail sent from the internet.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mike Mitchell
> > Systems eMAIL Administrator
> > Alverno Information Services
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information in

RE: exchange 2000 server specific options

[Andrey Fyodorov]

Here is something I can't figure out - what's the real purpose for e-mail
address enabled users if they don't have a mailbox?

I mean, I have spent 7 years with Exchange and can't see any benefits of
this feature.


-Original Message-
From: Arshad Rafat Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: exchange 2000 server specific options


Hi,

I think you have to recreate mailbox enabled user, there is no way to
convert the mail enabled user to mail box enabled user.  Once you get the
mail box enabled user, then you will get deilivery options to set mail
forwarding.

> Hi all,
> 
> i wanted to configure mail forwarding from mail enabled user to mailbox
> enabled user. From Active directory users & computers when i right mouse
> click and go to the property page for the contact in exchange general i
> don't see deliveray options...to set mail forwarding. Can anyone help me
> how to overcome this problem???

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail

[Mitchell Mike]

Good morning,

I wasn't here yesterday.  Could you please point me to the thread that
talked about this?

Thanks.

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail


Would you mind explaining this a bit further?  I don't have a PIX for our
firewall which was what was suggested yesterday when I posted about this.

Thanks in advance for any information.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 errors from Hot Mail


Try removing the SMTP fixup. This doesn't allow ESMTP commands to flow. 
Exchange uses these when talking to foreign email systems.


>Yes we sit behind a firewall..  Please share any information you can.
>
>I would greatly appreciate it.
>
>Regards,
>
>Mike Mitchell
>Systems eMAIL Administrator
>Alverno Information Services
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:40 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Re: 554 errors from Hot Mail
>
>
>Sounds familiar. Are you behind a firewall.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mitchell Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:31 AM
>Subject: 554 errors from Hot Mail
>
>
> > Good morning,
> >
> > Outlook 98.  Exchange 5.5 sp4.
> >
> > I have a user getting the following errors.  I do not know where to
>begin
>to
> > look.
> >
> > This Sister is using a Hotmail account to send to our exchange 
> > server. PLEASE HELP.
> >
> > Reporting-MTA: dns;hotmail.com
> > Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com
> > Arrival-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:21:19 -0800
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.0.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 Invalid data in message
> > . character on a line by itself.
> > .241.49])
> >
> > 250-AUTH
> > 250 SIZE 512
> > HELP
> > 250-SAML
> > 250-SEND
> > 250-SOML
> > 250-TURN
> > 250-XADR
> > 250-XSTA
> > 250-ETRN
> > 250-XGEN
> > 250-RELAY
> > 250 SIZE 2560
> > sent from the internet.
> >  transmit, or distribute unsolicited bulk
> > 220  e-mail sent from the internet.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mike Mitchell
> > Systems eMAIL Administrator
> > Alverno Information Services
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Zvon RFC hypertext system

[Benjamin Scott]

  This is just too nice.  All of the online Internet RFCs (Request For
Comments, the standards definition) have been turned into a hypertext system
and placed online here:

http://www.zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC_share/Output/

  Features include hyperlinks to other RFCs when referenced, status, links
to obsoleting, obsoleted, and referencing RFCs, and STD/BCP/FYI/humor and
other selections.

  Anyone who has ever had to worry about Internet interoperability will
greatly appreciate this system.

  (My apologies to any who are subscribed to the multiple lists I posted
this to, and thus received this message more than once.  This web site is
just so darn nice and useful that I figured it would be worth the possible
waste of bandwidth.)

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or  |
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: HELP IMS problems

[Herold Heiko]

I dumped the whole application event log to a text file, nothing.
Well, one thing:
Three days before a mail was received in temporary file
C:\EXCHSRVR\imcdata\in\HFHNJBAD.
However the previous one was HFHNJBA1 and the next one HFHNJBAF so I don't
think that's relevant.

With

XFOR: 4037 Event Starting Internet Mail Service, 1067 IMC Error [Q168883]

(no luck) and

Q165505 XADM: How to View/Delete Messages in MTS-IN and MTS-OUT Queues

I can see what is present in MTS-OUT. I could just delete thos messages (not
very nice), is there any way to set them undeliverable (send back NDR to
internal user) or extract the data ? Going through evey one with mdbvue32
while writing down sender/recipients/date in order to notifiy internal users
is not the best solution (lengthy queue). I'm looking for the documentation
of the message properties I can see i that way, where can I find that ?

Heiko Herold

-- 
-- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Ferretto, 1ph  x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087
-- ITALY

> -Original Message-
> From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: HELP IMS problems
> 
> 
> Are you sure you don't have an error in the application log 
> referencing a
> BAD message?  The error appears just like that - with BAD in caps.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:36 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: HELP IMS problems
> 
> 
> Hello,
> I've some trouble here :(
> 
> NT4, EX5.5 sp4, 3 servers in site, one of them with a IMS 
> configured to
> forward everything to another host (sendmail box).
> The IMS just started to die without reason, no log anywhere. 
> When restarted
> it does work for some seconds to die again even before the 
> control panel
> thingy stops to animate its icon.
> Push up every IMS log available, restart.. nothing special 
> anywhere, nothing
> in the event viewer, nothing (appareantly) different than usual in the
> exchsrvr\imcdata\log logs.
> 
> So I raised it's cost, add another connector on another 
> server with cost 1,
> change firewall and mail gateway, recalculate routing, now 
> mail at least is
> flowing again but I still don't know what happened, and the 
> queues of the
> old connector seem to be rather full. So for now I'm running 
> a batch trying
> to start the connector every 30 seconds, some mail goes out, 
> die, loop.
> 
> Any idea ?
> It should not be a malformed incoming mail - everything 
> waiting went to the
> new connector.
> Could be a outgoing mail, eventually (I hope) everyhting 
> present now in the
> old connector queues will go out except that one, but how 
> could I check ?
> The connector won't stay up long enough to check with axhange 
> admin, at
> least the queue tab keeps staying grayed out.
> That machine had no change lately, there's no local antivirus, no disk
> defragger, no freshly installed software.
> 
> Addendum:
> Now even worse.
> Trying to restart the service it seems to leave behind pieces in
> imcdata/out, and keeps adding them to the spool - which means 
> a growing
> queue and multiple sent emails. ANY idea please ?
> 
> Heiko Herold
> 
> -- 
> -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -- Via Ferretto, 1ph  x39-041-5907073
> -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087
> -- ITALY
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dsexport utility

[Mark Harford]

All,

We have a requirement to remove the ADC-Global-Names attribute from all
40,000 PF objects in one of our Exchange 55 Sites.  However this is proving
somewhat tricky to do.  A conventional directory import/export is not up to
the job due to not being able to export hidden public folder objects.

There is a "dsexport" utility mentioned in the following article which can
be used to extract hidden public folder objects from an Exchange 55
directory.  However I can not find whereabouts it is on the MSDN disks.  [I
can find some of the C code but really need the pre-compiled .exe]

support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q185/0/18.ASP

Can anyone point me in the right direction (i.e. which CD?) or suggest an
alternative?

Thanks

Mark

P.S. We are doing this in order to move PF directory objects that have
already been replicated into one AD domain, into another AD domain.  PSS
have ruled out using Movetree and suggested removing the ADC's PF Connection
Agreement, deleting ADC-Global-Names from the 55 PF objects and create a new
PF CA into the new domain. However any other suggestions are welcome.


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use,
copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify
the sender immediately. 
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent
or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 Server

[Etts, Russell]

Hi 

Just out of curiosity, is there anything in the event viewer?

Thanks

Russell

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Server


I am running Exchage Server 5.5 SP4 on NT 4 SP6a. Everyday, the server will
gradually use up all avaliable memory (non-paged) and fail. A reboot will
resolve the issue for another 24 hours.

I don't know if the OS has a memory leak or if Exchange has a corrupted DLL.
Re-applying SPs doesn't solve the problem.

I would like to create a new server with a clean Exchange install and
migrate this failing Exchange to it. I would then redo the original server
and bring everything back.

Is this a good strategy? Any and all tips are appreciated.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NDR's (was content)

[Roger Seielstad]

Then its on your end, not the recipients.

Sounds like that user has been blocked at your IMCs

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:11 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
> 
> 
> but the message comes back instantanuously
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 March, 2002 12:30 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
> 
> 
> Someone, somewhere does. You need to contact the 
> administrator responsible for that users mailbox. Its showing 
> a permissions problem.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mr Louis Joyce
> Data Support Analyst
> BT Ignite eSolutions
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 March 2002 09:38
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
> 
> 
> I don't control the recipients do I?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 March, 2002 10:30 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
> 
> 
> 'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'.
> 
> Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be 
> delivery restrictions imposed.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mr Louis Joyce
> Data Support Analyst
> BT Ignite eSolutions
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 March 2002 08:26
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
> 
> 
> what about this one? 
> 
> The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
> 
>   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 05-Mar-02 10:38 AM
> You do not have permission to send to this 
> recipient.  For assistance, contact your system administrator.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 March, 2002 7:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)
> 
> 
> There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx 
> records = no mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: NDR's (was content)
> 
> 
> 
> when I do local resolving it gives me these: 
> Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
> 
>   Subject:INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 
> 00-204 Type D
> Prolongation
>   Sent:   20-Mar-02 11:12 AM
> 
> The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
> 
>   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM
> The e-mail system was unable to deliver the 
> message, but did not report a specific reason.  Check the 
> address and try again.  If it still fails, contact your 
> system administrator.
> 
> 
> Kim
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archiv

RE: Upgrading to Enterprise 5.5

[Roger Seielstad]

Please remember to reinstall the appropriate Service Pack, though..

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Upgrading to Enterprise 5.5
> 
> 
> It's a no-brainer to upgrade to Enterprise. Seriously. Just 
> put the CD in and answer the questions appropriately. Other 
> then the requisite downtime it's not even a blip on operations.
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Russell Hopkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:28 PM
> Subject: Upgrading to Enterprise 5.5
> 
> 
> > We are getting ready to hit our head on the 16Gb limit of 
> our Exchange 
> > Server (5.5, SP4).  How difficult is it to upgrade to the 
> Enterprise 
> > version?  Also, how strongly should we consider taking this 
> > opportunity to upgrade to 2000 Enterprise directly from 5.5 
> Standard? 
> > (We're not
> currently
> > running any 2000 servers).
> >
> > Thanks, in advance,
> > Russ
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NDR's (was content)

[Kim Schotanus]

but the message comes back instantanuously

-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March, 2002 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


Someone, somewhere does. You need to contact the administrator
responsible
for that users mailbox. Its showing a permissions problem.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 09:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


I don't control the recipients do I?

-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'.

Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be delivery
restrictions imposed.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 08:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


what about this one? 

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 05-Mar-02 10:38 AM
You do not have permission to send to this recipient.  For
assistance, contact your system administrator.


-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March, 2002 7:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records =
no
mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR's (was content)



when I do local resolving it gives me these: 
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D
Prolongation
  Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM
The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did
not report a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  If it
still fails, contact your system administrator.


Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k

[Mark Harford]

Only unsupported methods - Q273478

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 20 March 2002 23:37
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k
> 
> 
> Is there anyway of undoing what Forestprep & domainprep do to 
> AD?  i.e. start again?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 20 March 2002 20:44
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k
> 
> What would the fun be in that.. I was trying to get the guy 
> all worried = ] 
> 
> --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
> Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> William Lefkovics
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:27 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k
> 
> 
> You can run them again for kicks if you wanted.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k
> 
> 
> No problem at all.. Just remember that you ran them so you 
> don't do it again.
> 
> --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
> Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Woodruff, Michael
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:32 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k
> 
> 
> Do you see any problem with me running these now and then 
> running the actual setup in a few months?  I want to test the 
> PF replication and some other stuff as well.  Thanks.
> 
> _
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use,
copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify
the sender immediately. 
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent
or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NDR's (was content)

[Louis Joyce]

Someone, somewhere does. You need to contact the administrator responsible
for that users mailbox. Its showing a permissions problem.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 09:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


I don't control the recipients do I?

-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'.

Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be delivery
restrictions imposed.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 08:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


what about this one? 

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 05-Mar-02 10:38 AM
You do not have permission to send to this recipient.  For
assistance, contact your system administrator.


-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March, 2002 7:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records =
no
mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR's (was content)



when I do local resolving it gives me these: 
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D
Prolongation
  Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM
The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did
not report a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  If it
still fails, contact your system administrator.


Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

CA's/PKI

[Myles, Damian]

Damn previous post should have been under the CA's/PKI subject header, not NDR's (was 
content)

Apologies
Mylo


>This sort of jumps in and out of topic re: this forum, so apologies if I stray too 
>far, and bear with me .. it all >ultimately relates to mail .. honest :)

>I wish to use a stand-alone root CA on Win2K, certificated (is there such a word?) 
>through one of the trusted root >authorities - Verisign/Thwaite/Entrust. 

>Hanging off this stand-alone root will be subordinate stand-alone's and subordinate 
>Enterprise CA's. The ultimate >aim, being able to distinguish between 
>internal/external users from an certificate enrollment perspective, and to >use 
>various encryption/signing techniques for transmitting mail.

>Questions are twofold:

>1. Do I have to use DSSTORE to import the certificate from the trusted third-party 
>into the stand-alone Root CA
>and is the only valid format PKCS#12 ? There is an import button on the Install 
>wizard during the Certsrv 
>installation phase which suggests certs can be brought in from trusted sources.

>2. Is the use of certificates in this grandfather/father/child type manner a valid 
>one.

>btw... any URL's or links to sites concerning PKI and Messaging would be appreciated.

>Ta muchly,
>Mylo

>PS: Has anyone actually done this ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NDR's (was content)

[Myles, Damian]

Morning/Afternoon/Evening (Delete as applicable)

This sort of jumps in and out of topic re: this forum, so apologies if I stray too 
far, and bear with me .. it all ultimately relates to mail .. honest :)

I wish to use a stand-alone root CA on Win2K, certificated (is there such a word?) 
through one of the trusted root authorities - Verisign/Thwaite/Entrust. 

Hanging off this stand-alone root will be subordinate stand-alone's and subordinate 
Enterprise CA's. The ultimate aim, being able to distinguish between internal/external 
users from an certificate enrollment perspective, and to use various 
encryption/signing techniques for transmitting mail.

Questions are twofold:

1. Do I have to use DSSTORE to import the certificate from the trusted third-party 
into the stand-alone Root CA and is the only valid format PKCS#12 ? There is an import 
button on the Install wizard during the Certsrv installation phase which suggests 
certs can be brought in from trusted sources.

2. Is the use of certificates in this grandfather/father/child type manner a valid one.

btw... any URL's or links to sites concerning PKI and Messaging would be appreciated.

Ta muchly,
Mylo

PS: Has anyone actually done this ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NDR's (was content)

[Kim Schotanus]

I don't control the recipients do I?

-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'.

Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be delivery
restrictions imposed.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 08:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


what about this one? 

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 05-Mar-02 10:38 AM
You do not have permission to send to this recipient.  For
assistance, contact your system administrator.


-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March, 2002 7:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records =
no
mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR's (was content)



when I do local resolving it gives me these: 
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D
Prolongation
  Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM
The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did
not report a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  If it
still fails, contact your system administrator.


Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: NDR's (was content)

[Louis Joyce]

'You do not have permission to send to this recipient'.

Check the permissions of the recipient. There seems to be delivery
restrictions imposed.

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 March 2002 08:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


what about this one? 

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 05-Mar-02 10:38 AM
You do not have permission to send to this recipient.  For
assistance, contact your system administrator.


-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March, 2002 7:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's (was content)


There ain't no mx records for chemie-uni-regensburg.de. No mx records =
no
mailhost for chemie-uni-regensburg.de.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR's (was content)



when I do local resolving it gives me these: 
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  INTAS Young Scientist Fellowship YSF 00-204 Type D
Prolongation
  Sent: 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 20-Mar-02 11:12 AM
The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did
not report a specific reason.  Check the address and try again.  If it
still fails, contact your system administrator.


Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Some "Hosts Unreachable"

[Ben Schorr]

As it turns out one of our upstream ISPs has misconfigured a router and
there was an MTU issue.

Daniel was correct to guess that it was a "Black Hole Router".  My
understanding is that basically it's what happens when a router simply
discards packets larger than it's MTU size, rather than responding with the
proper error code to let the server know to fragment the packets and
retransmit.

Since the packets just get dropped, the server keeps transmitting the
over-large packets until it times out the connection.  It was only happening
to some domains because the router in question was enough hops away from us
that only certain domains were sent that way -- others like SWNYK.COM didn't
go through that router and so they weren't affected.

The ISP realized their problem late in the day and by 17:30 all of our mail
was flowing normally again.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:00 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Some "Hosts Unreachable"
> 
> 
> First guess, Ben, is that they are set to deny relaying, but 
> I would guess incorrrectly. 
> 
> IIRC, that's RFC compliant behavior for denying relaying - as 
> long as it tanks before giving a valid response to the 354 section.
> 
> Roger
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:00 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Some "Hosts Unreachable"
> > 
> > 
> > This is a new one on me; maybe some of you have seen it
> > before.  Exchange 5.5 on NT4SP6a using the IMS to connect 
> > through an ISA server.  On a handful of hosts the message 
> > queues up with a "Host Unreachable" error.  On most hosts 
> > (including old favorites like aol.com, hotmail.com, etc.) 
> > mail comes and goes just fine and we don't seem to be having 
> > any problems RECEIVING mail.
> > 
> > But to this small band of hosts (including hawaii.edu and
> > hawaii.rr.com) the mail just queues up.  Here's a snippet 
> > from an SMTP log that may shed some
> > light:
> > 
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> MAIL
> > FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1977 RET=FULL
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.0 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
> > |
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.0 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY
> > 
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > |
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : >>> DATA
> > 
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< IO: |354 Start mail input;
> > end with .
> > |
> > 3/19/02 12:15:06 PM : <<< 354 Start mail input; end 
> > with .
> > 3/19/02 12:16:22 PM : 499 Host unreachable: cta.net.  Message
> > subject: ""Plain Text Test"".  Rescheduling delivery for later.
> > 
> > Notice that it seems to be going fine until it gets the 354
> > message, then it sits for a little over a minute and seems to 
> > time out.  This particular test message was just a couple of 
> > lines of plain text; so it shouldn't be a size issue.
> > 
> > We've already restarted the IMS several times and the entire
> > Exchange server once.  Judging by the oldest message in the 
> > queue this problem seems to have started this weekend and no 
> > unusual system maintenance or changes occurred over the 
> > weekend.  As far as I know we were able to send mail to/from 
> > those domains just fine on Friday.
> > 
> > Baffling.  Any thoughts on what might be causing this and how
> > we can resolve it?
> > 
> > -Ben-
> > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
> > Director of Information Services
> > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com 
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Excha

AW: Database Restores

[Trimmel-Wyss, Doris]

Take a look at Q224977 and Q200941

Doris

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. März 2002 21:00
An: Exchange Discussions
Betreff: Database Restores


When doing a restore (online) ex.5.5 sp4, does the restore put the "restore
in process" entry in the regristy for
DS and IS?  Are we suspose to delete those entries and then restort the
services

Ron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]