NT Replication
People Does anyone know of a list like this one that talks NT4 ??? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT Replication
swynk has one or two -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT Replication People Does anyone know of a list like this one that talks NT4 ??? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Exchange servers to a different domain
Victoria, Please note, if your service account is in it's own domain (say admin domain/user domain) and you are just moving the exchange servers from a resource domain to 'a n other' domain then make sure the users log out as the server doesn't appear to stop for the Outlook clients, but will stop getting their Email until they logout, then login to the exchange server in it's new domain. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange servers to a different domain Also Appendix K - it covers how to move Exchange servers to a new domain. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange servers to a different domain Check the FAQ (specifically Appendix E) for some links to useful information. -Original Message- From: Victoria Oseni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Exchange servers to a different domain I have an NT4 domain and an exchange resource domain. I want to migrate my two exchange servers and the PDC for the resource doamin to our main domain. I want to dot his without much disruption to the network. What do I do?. Thanks for any help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery
Yeah thanks guys. I'm trying to follow this to the letter and try and restore just a single mailbox. Frank -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Read this: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a sp Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Is there a step by step method of how to restore from an online backup to a test exchange server? The way I've tried to do it is to build DR server similar to roigin in config but not Spec, ie different manufacturers. Installed NT 4 sp6 and made it BDC. Connected the BDC to live network to pull acccount info, having given it a name different to the live Exchange box. Once account info is on box, disconnected from live network and installed Exchang 5.5, sp4 and restored databases. Problem is when I get to the point of rename DR box to live box on the test network the NT accounts disappear and I get stuck. Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Winnt 4 SP6 Any ideas? Frank ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs. ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How about this as an option?
Thanks Chris, I wont call you Shirley again, If the only bridgehead server in a routing group is down, there are no other routes for the mailbox server to choose. So a mailbox server can not see bridgehead servers outside of its routing group? Correct? This is a shame especially as the network could still be in place and there is a perfectly good bridgehead server that you can physically connect to No, LSA is shared between all servers in a routing group, only one server is the routing group master for the link state data. I see! Surely the mailbox server would need to have knowledge of the bridgehead servers and their priority? It does and stop calling me Shirley. The key point being that they only have knowledge of the bridgehead servers in their routing group ? Right? Donald Livengood an HP consultant gave a 2 hour presentation on the subject in fast talkin redneck at a Compaq Exchange Academy I attended. I think he might have given a similar presentation at MEC last year or the year before.. Might check Microsoft's website for the slide deck. I found this http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/using/training/MEC00_track2.asp Thanks very much. With only 3 mailbox servers I ponder the need for bridgehead servers or for separate routing groups. The setup is actually a bit larger than this and the design of multiple routing groups was put in before I started. FYI the set up is: 3 routing groups each routing group is centred in a regional hub office (3 different parts of the world). Each hub office has several other office locations in their region some with mailbox server(s). So in total about three mailbox servers per region. Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Smtp connector gone mad?
We have an exchange 2000 server that we joined to the Exchange 5.5 org/site. When I setup an smtp connector on the exchange 2000 server (including adding all the domain names I want, mail from the exchange 5.5 server directed to the exchange 2000 users gets picked up by the smtp connector and eventually ends up in the queue undeliverable messages?? When I delete the smtp connector everything goes back to normal. What tick box have I missed? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk Import
We found it useful to keep a record of the dlists that such marked-for-deletion users are a member of, so you could copy them to a custom attribute at the same time (and perhaps do the same for the SMTP addresses). Then if they return to the company the re-enabling process is that much easier. Alternatively exmerge the mailboxes to a PST, stick it on a CD and give it to HR. Mark -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk Import I did some more digging and found the solution I needed to add ~Del to the field to be imported. Paul -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 12:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bulk Import Hi all, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6A I am trying to find a way to do a bulk import of changes to existing mailboxes. The scenario is if the Primary Windows NT account and Obj-User Attributes are \Unkown then it is unlikely anyone is using the mailbox, to make sure we want to change the Display Name to signify the mailbox is not used, remove all the distribution lists, remove all SMTP addresses and hide the mailbox. I am doing this manually at the moment but want to script the process. I do a directorty export and make the changes to my test user and then import, the displayname is changed and the mailbox is hideden, but the DL membership still exist as do the SMTP addresses, regardless of whether I do a append or overwrite directory import. Any thoughts as to why this doesn't work? TIA Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT Replication
Google is your friend, perchance? -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 08:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT Replication People Does anyone know of a list like this one that talks NT4 ??? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You mean GroupWise client? I will try that. Thanks! rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Download the GW Client from microsoft and move everything out of the calendar folder and start moving stuff back in until you figure out which request is the culprit. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar PST FILE Egads man, don't you have a SERVER? My question mark key is acting weird. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I did setup a profile for this conference room and I was able to open up the pst file and I can view everything but as soon as I click on Calendar, that's it. It freezes up. What should I do? How do I switch by category or by recurrence? Any ideas? Thanks again for all the help. rama -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You probably have a corrupt calendar entry in there. Set up a profile for this conference room, open the PST, switch to By Category or By Recurrence view and copy only the NON-RECURRING meetings back into the original calendar. Then you can start looking for the culprit recurring meeting [1]. Look for meetings with lots of exceptions or blank subject lines or that have a conflict icon next to it. Serdar Soysal [1] It is a recurring meeting 99% of the time. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conference Board Calendar Hello everyone, We are currently running exchange 5.5 SP4. Recently all of our users including the exchange admin account are unable to open the conference room's calendar to view who has booked the room. Everyone can request the conference room and only the receptionist is able to view the conference room's calendar to accept and reject the requests. Even she can only do it for one day that is just for today. If she tries to look it up for tomorrow or next week, then it just hangs, and I see that it tries to Synchronize for hours. This issue just started recently as far as I know. What can I do to resolve this issue? Please help. I even tried to recreate the mail box and it doesn't work. Meaning, even after I created a .pst file and put the data back into the new mail box that I created, it still does the same thing..it just freezes up if you try to look up the information for more than one day. Any way to clean this up or resolve this
MS Mail mjgration
Hi, I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a document or guide of some description they can pass on. Best Regards, Simon Caisley EDS - I.Solutions Core Infrastructure EMEA Messaging Collaborative Services Tel:+44 (0) 191 5874075 Fax: +44 (0) 191 5181304 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intranet: http://www.groupware.emea.eds.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders
You might try removing the Outlook Preferences file (usually located under System Folder - Preferences) on the Mac and see if that will do it. Nate -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders I'm starting to wonder if maybe this is a problem with one of the many shared libraries in the Extensions folder, or maybe a Preferences file. Isn't there some way of getting Outlook 2001 back to a first-run situation, aside from totally reinstalling it, that is? -Peter -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders You are quite right. I should have been more specific. I should have said when he launches Outlook he should be asked to login to the NT domain the Exchange server is on (I have to do this every time on my Mac). Sorry for the confusion there. Nate -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders nope. Well being on a mac he doesnt log in to a domain, but his nt account and the exchange server are in the same domain; we run a single master domain here. Beaten paths are for beaten men. Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer. - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:21 PM Subject: RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders Does he happen to log into another domain other than the one in which the Exchange servers exist? If so, what kind of trust exists between the two domains? -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders 1. Nope. Will do. 2. He does have a HOSTS file. Thats how he gets connectivity to the Exchange Server 3. I have not moved his account to another server but I have deleted his mailbox and domain account and recreated both from scratch. I will try this too. Thanks for all the suggestions. Beaten paths are for beaten men. Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer. - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:59 PM Subject: RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders I haven't had any problems either with Outlook 2001 for the Mac. I am wondering three things: 1) Have you tried to create a new Outlook profile through the Outlook Settings control panel? 2) Does this user have a hosts file? 3) Have you tried moving his account to another server to see if that improves his situation? Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders How much can you see under Public Folders, anything at all? Can you see the folders themselves? It should work, by the way. I've successfully looked at Public folders on a Mac running OS 9.2, without help from Dave, and also without Appletalk running at all on the Windows network. -Peter -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 13:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders The latest OS before X. It is Outlook 2001, yes. I have given his mailbox specific rights to all the folders in the heirarchy. We dont have Dave on there currently; I didnt add it as I dont see it being a help in this case. We may add it later on for File Server access. Beaten paths are for beaten men. Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer. - Original Message - From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:39 PM Subject: RE: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders When you say the latest Outlook, we're talking Outlook 2001, right? It almost has to be a permissions thing since, as you say, the connectivity piece is working fine. Have you tried giving this user specific rights to the public folders? Also, are any other Windows to Mac things running on the Mac, like Dave, or the Connectix equivalent whose name I can't remember at the moment? What version of MacOS? -Peter -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 13:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders no other macs not running Appletalk, I refuse to load it on my servers, but they are running tcp/ip they can get their mail just fine so you would
RE: Virus Attack ??
I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
No need for that mate..lets see when you have a simlar situation with active directory and I am as sympathetic as you have been.. From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:49:51 +0100 Ooh! Ooh! Look everybody, it's URGENT and he posted it twice! Jeez... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now possed the question of disaster recovery. We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server. We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this. The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use. Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange server does not function unless the other one goes down.) Please help - I am in grave danger. Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC with 2nd site in domain
In my org. I have two sites in exchange. I setup a connection agreement with my site to populate the AD. The users in the 2nd site can no longer see public folders or even appear in the GAL. In order for this to work do I need to setup a connection agreement in my ADC for this site? Only on my 1st e2k server in the 5.5 site so running mixed mode (Exchange). If I setup the connection agreement for this site should it be a one way, or do the 2 way... We have a one-way trust relationship at this time, we trust them, but, they don't trust us... Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Short version: Bite me. Long version: No, the fundamental difference is that I would have done some research first, documented what I _had_ done in any message that I sent out, which I would do only having read any appropriate FAQ's, I wouldn't post the request more than once, I wouldn't flag it as urgent, and I wouldn't expect list members to drop everything to help me out. And if I _did_ consider it urgent, then I'd drop a dime and call in MS support. But then again, that's just me, and that's kinda why I answer questions (sometimes) rather than asking them. On the other hand, the original post, and your response, are one of the reasons that I don't hang around here very much anymore. Or why a lot of other very experienced and knowledgeable folks either (a) don't play here any more, or (b) have more intelligent places to play. Gary -Original Message- From: Michael Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No need for that mate..lets see when you have a simlar situation with active directory and I am as sympathetic as you have been.. From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:49:51 +0100 Ooh! Ooh! Look everybody, it's URGENT and he posted it twice! Jeez... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now possed the question of disaster recovery. We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server. We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this. The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use. Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange server does not function unless the other one goes down.) Please help - I am in grave danger. Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
KMA. No part of what I wrote is either (a) rude (OK, so clue 4 is borderline on that one), or (b) incorrect. Further more, the answer to his question is contained completely within the first clue that I pointed out. Or did you not bother to check? -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Exchange Administrator...Tools...Track Message. Welcome to exchange, get yourself a few good books, I would recommend Exchange Server 5.5 Unleashed as a good starting point. The online help is great as well. Read the FAQ's here. Jeff -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning??? YIKES!! -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How about this as an option?
Chris, couldn't find that David Livengood presenattion unfortunately so I have one last question...;¬) Each of the 3 hubs has a link to the corporate wan (using routing group connectors) and a link to the internet (will use smtp connector). What we want to be able to do use the internet connector in that routing group to route email to recipients in another routing group if the routing group connector dies in that routing group. Is this possible? Also we want to do the reverse, ie. use the routing group connector in that routing group to route email to recipients on the internet if the smtp connector dies in that routing group. Is this possible? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Wrong side of The Pond... -Original Message- From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning??? YIKES!! -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Virus Attack ??
Must have :=( And it's not even Friday. Gary, relax, it's ok, go for a smoke or something. Lay off the coffee :=) Jerzy From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/16 Thu AM 10:15:42 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning??? YIKES!! -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Gary is a frog? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Wrong side of The Pond... -Original Message- From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning??? YIKES!! -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
RE: How about this as an option?
Presentation issue handled offline. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How about this as an option? Chris, couldn't find that David Livengood presenattion unfortunately so I have one last question...;¬) Each of the 3 hubs has a link to the corporate wan (using routing group connectors) and a link to the internet (will use smtp connector). What we want to be able to do use the internet connector in that routing group to route email to recipients in another routing group if the routing group connector dies in that routing group. Is this possible? Also we want to do the reverse, ie. use the routing group connector in that routing group to route email to recipients on the internet if the smtp connector dies in that routing group. Is this possible? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. It is funny, I am on an SMS list with some absolutely amazing technical people and there isn't the same incredible attitude problem, no matter how any times the same question gets asked. Perhaps you just take as much pride in being rude, as you do in your exchange knowledge. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Short version: Bite me. Long version: No, the fundamental difference is that I would have done some research first, documented what I _had_ done in any message that I sent out, which I would do only having read any appropriate FAQ's, I wouldn't post the request more than once, I wouldn't flag it as urgent, and I wouldn't expect list members to drop everything to help me out. And if I _did_ consider it urgent, then I'd drop a dime and call in MS support. But then again, that's just me, and that's kinda why I answer questions (sometimes) rather than asking them. On the other hand, the original post, and your response, are one of the reasons that I don't hang around here very much anymore. Or why a lot of other very experienced and knowledgeable folks either (a) don't play here any more, or (b) have more intelligent places to play. Gary -Original Message- From: Michael Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No need for that mate..lets see when you have a simlar situation with active directory and I am as sympathetic as you have been.. From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:49:51 +0100 Ooh! Ooh! Look everybody, it's URGENT and he posted it twice! Jeez... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now possed the question of disaster recovery. We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server. We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this. The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use. Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange server does not function unless the other one goes down.) Please help - I am in grave danger. Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the
RE: Anything else after restore
Crowley's method would have applied. -Original Message- From: Paul Done [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anything else after restore I just finished the restore when I moved mailboxes from one server/domain to another. While my users are satisfied, (many of them did not even know we moved) and I can see that mail is coming in and out. I wonder if I have missed something in practice or principle. I moved everyone off the domain controller / exchange server (I know - BAD!) to a stand alone exchange server in a new domain. Next I connected the clients to their new empty mailbox, and moved their old information via PST to the new mailbox. I have ~50 users each with boxes about 5-25MB. My questions are 1) I will not benefit from single instance storage until those items reach an archive date and a moved down to client archive folders - right? 2) Do PST restores (like I did) introduce the possibility of corruption or anything potentially catastrophic I should be aware of? 3) Is there something I can do now to clean up this, or is it fine? 4) Was there any other way to move these mailboxes between domains ( I read Crowley's Method and it didn't seem to apply)? If you have other recommendations or prefer to contact me off list I would enjoy your input. Paul Done [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Agreed. Maybe he should play in another pond. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Gary is a frog? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Wrong side of The Pond... -Original Message- From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning??? YIKES!! -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
RE: Event LOG
I believe this question has been answered in the last 48 hours on this list. -Original Message- From: Vijayakumar, T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event LOG Hi All, Iam working with Exchange server 2000 with and I have created Event and i regitered it for one folder. Thats working fine, i want to know where is the log file for the Event Handler.I read Event Log will be created but i dont know the location of the file. If anyone have idea about this pls let me know Regards Vijay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How about this as an option?
Thanks Chris, I wont call you Shirley again, If the only bridgehead server in a routing group is down, there are no other routes for the mailbox server to choose. So a mailbox server can not see bridgehead servers outside of its routing group? Correct? Well, whether it can or can't is really kind of a moot point because it need to pass the message to the specified bridgead(s) in its site to be passed on. This is a shame especially as the network could still be in place and there is a perfectly good bridgehead server that you can physically connect to Exchange only knows about the messaging links defined for it though, and with the only bridgehead in its site down, as far as that Exchange server is concerned it is cut off from the rest of the world. No, LSA is shared between all servers in a routing group, only one server is the routing group master for the link state data. I see! Surely the mailbox server would need to have knowledge of the bridgehead servers and their priority? It does and stop calling me Shirley. The key point being that they only have knowledge of the bridgehead servers in their routing group ? Right? No, I think[1] that they have knowledge of servers outside of their site, but they also know what paths they are allowed to use to deliver mail, and with the bridgehead down, there are no remaining paths. Donald Livengood an HP consultant gave a 2 hour presentation on the subject in fast talkin redneck at a Compaq Exchange Academy I attended. I think he might have given a similar presentation at MEC last year or the year before.. Might check Microsoft's website for the slide deck. I found this http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/using/training/MEC00_track2.asp Thanks very much. With only 3 mailbox servers I ponder the need for bridgehead servers or for separate routing groups. The setup is actually a bit larger than this and the design of multiple routing groups was put in before I started. FYI the set up is: 3 routing groups each routing group is centred in a regional hub office (3 different parts of the world). Each hub office has several other office locations in their region some with mailbox server(s). So in total about three mailbox servers per region. How big are the pipes and servers. I've seen a lot of E2K designs where it was clear the architects were stuck in 5.5 ways of thinking. I'm not saying that is the case for you, but there's always that possibility. In answer to the bigger question I think.. You can add more bridgeheads with higher routing costs to provide redundancy in message routing while still maintaining primary message traffic routes for normal circumstances. [1] Think, don't have time to verify at the moment, but either way I don't think it matters to the answer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pop3 mailboxes
Your phrasing of the question indicates a misunderstanding of the way mail works. You don't have a POP3 mailbox; you couldn't, as there is no such thing. You have a mailbox that you retrieve mail from using the POP3 protocol. It is placed *into* the mailbox using the specific routing mechanism of the mail server itself. In your scenario there would only be one POP3 connection to your mailbox: the one you are using. So whether it allows one connection or 42, that is immaterial. POP3 is a pure retrieval protocol and has nothing to do with how the mail gets *into* the mailbox (or server either, for that matter) -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:42 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: pop3 mailboxes Subject: pop3 mailboxes How many connections to a single POP3 mailbox can be open at the same time? I've got an Exchange 2000 server downloading using the SBS POP connector from our provider, mails are being sent to a specific mailbox, but intermittently do not arrive in the POP3 box. The connector downloads every 15mins. The provider says there is no problem with the POP3 box, and I have deleted and recreated the box at least once. Any thoughts? (I thought pop could only permit a single concurrent connection??) Regards, Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7960 Mob 07974 111867 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
-Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How about this as an option?
-Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Presentation issue handled offline. Thanks Gary. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Each of the 3 hubs has a link to the corporate wan (using routing group connectors) and a link to the internet (will use smtp connector). What we want to be able to do use the internet connector in that routing group to route email to recipients in another routing group if the routing group connector dies in that routing group. Is this possible? Also we want to do the reverse, ie. use the routing group connector in that routing group to route email to recipients on the internet if the smtp connector dies in that routing group. Is this possible? More broadly, is it possible to have connectors which use multiple network links for the sake of redundancy, yes. Is it possible to flip mail on an internal route to an external route or versa vice? My gut instinct is no, although I haven't ever tried. That doesn't mean you can't define an 'internal' connector which goes over a WAN (internet link).. Like I said in a previous message I think, Exchange only knows about the links defined, not about the network it travels to get there. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! I am great! -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Mail mjgration
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really updated the MS Mail docs for E2K. -Original Message- From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS Mail mjgration Hi, I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a document or guide of some description they can pass on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
No, other way around, actually. Now go look up what an MVP is. And then consider who you've just addressed yourself to, and what he's done compared to what you've done. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! I am great! -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
-Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! Not on a first date I don't -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. Hell, I remember my first question on this list, I was told succinctly by Ed Crowley to read the FAQ, check the knowledgebase, and if I still had questions, then ask them, BUT UNDER NO MEANS SHOULD I EVER ASK SUCH A STUPID QUESTION AGAIN WITHOUT FIRST TRYING TO FIND THE ANSWER. The long and the short of it is this, (Paraphrashing ED), if you want to be treated nice, call PSS. If you want the answers, first try and find out the information on your own, read the FAQ, search the archives, look into technet, then and only then, ask your question here. I guess what I'm saying, is life is hard, and sometimes ppl get a bit tired of answering questions that are quite easily answered if you only do the research first. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery
You can't restore a single mailbox from an online backup, you have to restore the entire directory. Jessica -Original Message- From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Yeah thanks guys. I'm trying to follow this to the letter and try and restore just a single mailbox. Frank -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Read this: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a sp Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Is there a step by step method of how to restore from an online backup to a test exchange server? The way I've tried to do it is to build DR server similar to roigin in config but not Spec, ie different manufacturers. Installed NT 4 sp6 and made it BDC. Connected the BDC to live network to pull acccount info, having given it a name different to the live Exchange box. Once account info is on box, disconnected from live network and installed Exchang 5.5, sp4 and restored databases. Problem is when I get to the point of rename DR box to live box on the test network the NT accounts disappear and I get stuck. Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Winnt 4 SP6 Any ideas? Frank ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs. ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
*yawn* I believe this argument and every possible variant thereof can be found in the archives... Since only 3 ppl decided to purchase a copy of the archives last quarter that means most of you will just have to take my word for it. If y'all can't find more original arguments I'm afraid I'm going to have to open up my bag and bring out ThE sTiCk[tm]. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. It is funny, I am on an SMS list with some absolutely amazing technical people and there isn't the same incredible attitude problem, no matter how any times the same question gets asked. Perhaps you just take as much pride in being rude, as you do in your exchange knowledge. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Short version: Bite me. Long version: No, the fundamental difference is that I would have done some research first, documented what I _had_ done in any message that I sent out, which I would do only having read any appropriate FAQ's, I wouldn't post the request more than once, I wouldn't flag it as urgent, and I wouldn't expect list members to drop everything to help me out. And if I _did_ consider it urgent, then I'd drop a dime and call in MS support. But then again, that's just me, and that's kinda why I answer questions (sometimes) rather than asking them. On the other hand, the original post, and your response, are one of the reasons that I don't hang around here very much anymore. Or why a lot of other very experienced and knowledgeable folks either (a) don't play here any more, or (b) have more intelligent places to play. Gary -Original Message- From: Michael Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No need for that mate..lets see when you have a simlar situation with active directory and I am as sympathetic as you have been.. From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:49:51 +0100 Ooh! Ooh! Look everybody, it's URGENT and he posted it twice! Jeez... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now possed the question of disaster recovery. We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server. We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this. The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use. Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange server does not function unless the other one goes down.) Please help - I am in grave danger. Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Never said I wanted that. I just think so of you people need to get some personal skills. If you don't like helping people don't do it, but if you don't mind, why the attitude? Don't bother answering, it is a rhetorical question. We all get annoyed in answering the same question time and time again, but be a little constructive. I am not being critical, I will leave that to the *experts*, I just don't understand why there is this big attitude problem. Some of the emails spend more space whinging and complaining about people writing stupid questions, then they do giving answers. Gary's post was just one example. Why write Bite me? Why make the smart-arse comment in the first place? Why not just ignore it? Why not just write Read the FAQ or Read the on-line help. The following quote is from section 1.11 in the FAQ: A: None whatsoever. While you may be tempted to wrest mirth from such an annoyance as someone bothering 4000 other subscribers with a test message, there is absolutely nothing you can post in response that will ameliorate this particular trespass. Whatever you are thinking of saying, be it You failed or Did I pass? has surely been said before, and perhaps was not a knee-slapper in the first place. Just let it go. Please explain why it is unacceptable to bother 4000 other subscribers with a test message, but not unacceptable to bother 4000 odd subscribers with unproductive and ridiculous drivel like some of the stuff we see on the list in response to genuine queries (even if the answer is in the manual/help!). Do you think you are cool or something by sending these sorts of messages? Is there some sort of competition where you have an award for the person who can flame the most posters? I don't know, I thought most people here were working for a living, but some of these emails could have come from a primary school. Bottom line is, there is a difference between being short with someone, where you can answer the question and point them in the right direction and make sure they know they screwed up by not checking in the first place, and the stupid emails with contribute nothing. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery
I think however he is referring to the procedure that is described in the DR Paper on how to do this. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery You can't restore a single mailbox from an online backup, you have to restore the entire directory. Jessica -Original Message- From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Yeah thanks guys. I'm trying to follow this to the letter and try and restore just a single mailbox. Frank -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 May 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Read this: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a sp Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery Is there a step by step method of how to restore from an online backup to a test exchange server? The way I've tried to do it is to build DR server similar to roigin in config but not Spec, ie different manufacturers. Installed NT 4 sp6 and made it BDC. Connected the BDC to live network to pull acccount info, having given it a name different to the live Exchange box. Once account info is on box, disconnected from live network and installed Exchang 5.5, sp4 and restored databases. Problem is when I get to the point of rename DR box to live box on the test network the NT accounts disappear and I get stuck. Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Winnt 4 SP6 Any ideas? Frank ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs. ___ This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter. Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __ _ List posting FAQ:
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
MVP??? WOW... This is getting REALLY interesting now... -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No, other way around, actually. Now go look up what an MVP is. And then consider who you've just addressed yourself to, and what he's done compared to what you've done. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! I am great! -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Being nice has nothing to do with it. Being big assholes (not specifically anybody) has everything to do with it. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. Hell, I remember my first question on this list, I was told succinctly by Ed Crowley to read the FAQ, check the knowledgebase, and if I still had questions, then ask them, BUT UNDER NO MEANS SHOULD I EVER ASK SUCH A STUPID QUESTION AGAIN WITHOUT FIRST TRYING TO FIND THE ANSWER. The long and the short of it is this, (Paraphrashing ED), if you want to be treated nice, call PSS. If you want the answers, first try and find out the information on your own, read the FAQ, search the archives, look into technet, then and only then, ask your question here. I guess what I'm saying, is life is hard, and sometimes ppl get a bit tired of answering questions that are quite easily answered if you only do the research first. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Yeah... That not the point I was making. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No, other way around, actually. Now go look up what an MVP is. And then consider who you've just addressed yourself to, and what he's done compared to what you've done. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! I am great! -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
ROFLMAO I also subscribe to a listserv that relates to HIPAA issues (hippalive). And it is s dull and some of the posts from some users are more in the nature of see much I know. Besides the excellent support and advice I get (when I remember to pose the question properly including all the research I've done), the off-the-wall comments always make it an enjoyable read. I've been subscribed for a few years now and, sadly, it does seem that some of the experts (like the ED's) are less likely to appear. Cthulhu left, too. sigh Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Look at me! I know exchange better than you!!! You suck! Not on a first date I don't -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Ok, but please, not the face. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY *yawn* I believe this argument and every possible variant thereof can be found in the archives... Since only 3 ppl decided to purchase a copy of the archives last quarter that means most of you will just have to take my word for it. If y'all can't find more original arguments I'm afraid I'm going to have to open up my bag and bring out ThE sTiCk[tm]. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. It is funny, I am on an SMS list with some absolutely amazing technical people and there isn't the same incredible attitude problem, no matter how any times the same question gets asked. Perhaps you just take as much pride in being rude, as you do in your exchange knowledge. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Short version: Bite me. Long version: No, the fundamental difference is that I would have done some research first, documented what I _had_ done in any message that I sent out, which I would do only having read any appropriate FAQ's, I wouldn't post the request more than once, I wouldn't flag it as urgent, and I wouldn't expect list members to drop everything to help me out. And if I _did_ consider it urgent, then I'd drop a dime and call in MS support. But then again, that's just me, and that's kinda why I answer questions (sometimes) rather than asking them. On the other hand, the original post, and your response, are one of the reasons that I don't hang around here very much anymore. Or why a lot of other very experienced and knowledgeable folks either (a) don't play here any more, or (b) have more intelligent places to play. Gary -Original Message- From: Michael Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No need for that mate..lets see when you have a simlar situation with active directory and I am as sympathetic as you have been.. From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:49:51 +0100 Ooh! Ooh! Look everybody, it's URGENT and he posted it twice! Jeez... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now possed the question of disaster recovery. We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server. We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this. The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use. Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange server does not function unless the other one goes down.) Please help - I am in grave danger. Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Gary's post was just one example. Why write Bite me? Why make the smart-arse comment in the first place? Why not just ignore it? Why not just write Read the FAQ or Read the on-line help. Why not just answer the freaking question as well, which he actually did. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
The attitude has always been part of the character of the list. Personally, I rather like it that way. Anyone who doesn't like the character of this list is quite free to go elsewhere. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. It is funny, I am on an SMS list with some absolutely amazing technical people and there isn't the same incredible attitude problem, no matter how any times the same question gets asked. Perhaps you just take as much pride in being rude, as you do in your exchange knowledge. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Short version: Bite me. Long version: No, the fundamental difference is that I would have done some research first, documented what I _had_ done in any message that I sent out, which I would do only having read any appropriate FAQ's, I wouldn't post the request more than once, I wouldn't flag it as urgent, and I wouldn't expect list members to drop everything to help me out. And if I _did_ consider it urgent, then I'd drop a dime and call in MS support. But then again, that's just me, and that's kinda why I answer questions (sometimes) rather than asking them. On the other hand, the original post, and your response, are one of the reasons that I don't hang around here very much anymore. Or why a lot of other very experienced and knowledgeable folks either (a) don't play here any more, or (b) have more intelligent places to play. Gary -Original Message- From: Michael Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No need for that mate..lets see when you have a simlar situation with active directory and I am as sympathetic as you have been.. From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:49:51 +0100 Ooh! Ooh! Look everybody, it's URGENT and he posted it twice! Jeez... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now possed the question of disaster recovery. We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server. We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this. The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use. Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange server does not function unless the other one goes down.) Please help - I am in grave danger. Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Virus Attack ??
Actually, since this list is free, and anyone can come here and ask a question, I don't think anyone has a right to say, Don't talk to me that way. Don't get me wrong, I don't like it much either when Mr. Ely gets his panties in a wad and goes hog out on me, but then I also don't like it when someone signs onto the list and asks, How can I change the admin account password?, which has been asked at least 500 times and the answer is out there to be found. I have a very good friend whom I was managing and he had this really bad habit of always asking me How big can a DIM field be? (Extra credit if you know a. What language we are talking about, b. What the answer is) I used to just spout the answer off without thinking about it, then I decided one day to make him look it up. He got quite upset with me, and said, You know, why don't you just tell me? To which I replied, Give a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime. While I do my best to be nice, that doesn't mean I expect others to. As a matter of fact, saying that they should is really placing my standards of conduct upon them, something I don't have the right to do, and neither do you. While if we all lived in a perfect world, people would never get upset and say cross things, this isn't the perfect world, and some people, and yes even those that have the greatest knowledge of all, sometimes just say mean things, my heartfelt suggestion is either learn to deal with it, or unsubscribe from the list. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Being nice has nothing to do with it. Being big assholes (not specifically anybody) has everything to do with it. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. Hell, I remember my first question on this list, I was told succinctly by Ed Crowley to read the FAQ, check the knowledgebase, and if I still had questions, then ask them, BUT UNDER NO MEANS SHOULD I EVER ASK SUCH A STUPID QUESTION AGAIN WITHOUT FIRST TRYING TO FIND THE ANSWER. The long and the short of it is this, (Paraphrashing ED), if you want to be treated nice, call PSS. If you want the answers, first try and find out the information on your own, read the FAQ, search the archives, look into technet, then and only then, ask your question here. I guess what I'm saying, is life is hard, and sometimes ppl get a bit tired of answering questions that are quite easily answered if you only do the research first. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
RE: Virus Attack ??
True.. How do you change the service account password again? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Actually, since this list is free, and anyone can come here and ask a question, I don't think anyone has a right to say, Don't talk to me that way. Don't get me wrong, I don't like it much either when Mr. Ely gets his panties in a wad and goes hog out on me, but then I also don't like it when someone signs onto the list and asks, How can I change the admin account password?, which has been asked at least 500 times and the answer is out there to be found. I have a very good friend whom I was managing and he had this really bad habit of always asking me How big can a DIM field be? (Extra credit if you know a. What language we are talking about, b. What the answer is) I used to just spout the answer off without thinking about it, then I decided one day to make him look it up. He got quite upset with me, and said, You know, why don't you just tell me? To which I replied, Give a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime. While I do my best to be nice, that doesn't mean I expect others to. As a matter of fact, saying that they should is really placing my standards of conduct upon them, something I don't have the right to do, and neither do you. While if we all lived in a perfect world, people would never get upset and say cross things, this isn't the perfect world, and some people, and yes even those that have the greatest knowledge of all, sometimes just say mean things, my heartfelt suggestion is either learn to deal with it, or unsubscribe from the list. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Being nice has nothing to do with it. Being big assholes (not specifically anybody) has everything to do with it. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. Hell, I remember my first question on this list, I was told succinctly by Ed Crowley to read the FAQ, check the knowledgebase, and if I still had questions, then ask them, BUT UNDER NO MEANS SHOULD I EVER ASK SUCH A STUPID QUESTION AGAIN WITHOUT FIRST TRYING TO FIND THE ANSWER. The long and the short of it is this, (Paraphrashing ED), if you want to be treated nice, call PSS. If you want the answers, first try and find out the information on your own, read the FAQ, search the archives, look into technet, then and only then, ask your question here. I guess what I'm saying, is life is hard, and sometimes ppl get a bit tired of answering questions that are quite easily answered if you only do the research first. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3:
RE: Virus Attack ??
When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Yep, I have been on worse lists. But then those were not work related. It just surprises me that's all... (Last I am going to say on it as well!) -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY The attitude has always been part of the character of the list. Personally, I rather like it that way. Anyone who doesn't like the character of this list is quite free to go elsewhere. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. It is funny, I am on an SMS list with some absolutely amazing technical people and there isn't the same incredible attitude problem, no matter how any times the same question gets asked. Perhaps you just take as much pride in being rude, as you do in your exchange knowledge. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Short version: Bite me. Long version: No, the fundamental difference is that I would have done some research first, documented what I _had_ done in any message that I sent out, which I would do only having read any appropriate FAQ's, I wouldn't post the request more than once, I wouldn't flag it as urgent, and I wouldn't expect list members to drop everything to help me out. And if I _did_ consider it urgent, then I'd drop a dime and call in MS support. But then again, that's just me, and that's kinda why I answer questions (sometimes) rather than asking them. On the other hand, the original post, and your response, are one of the reasons that I don't hang around here very much anymore. Or why a lot of other very experienced and knowledgeable folks either (a) don't play here any more, or (b) have more intelligent places to play. Gary -Original Message- From: Michael Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No need for that mate..lets see when you have a simlar situation with active directory and I am as sympathetic as you have been.. From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:49:51 +0100 Ooh! Ooh! Look everybody, it's URGENT and he posted it twice! Jeez... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now possed the question of disaster recovery. We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server. We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this. The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use. Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange server does not function unless the other one goes down.) Please help - I am in grave danger. Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: Virus Attack ??
Can you change it to a haiku passphrase? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? True.. How do you change the service account password again? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Actually, since this list is free, and anyone can come here and ask a question, I don't think anyone has a right to say, Don't talk to me that way. Don't get me wrong, I don't like it much either when Mr. Ely gets his panties in a wad and goes hog out on me, but then I also don't like it when someone signs onto the list and asks, How can I change the admin account password?, which has been asked at least 500 times and the answer is out there to be found. I have a very good friend whom I was managing and he had this really bad habit of always asking me How big can a DIM field be? (Extra credit if you know a. What language we are talking about, b. What the answer is) I used to just spout the answer off without thinking about it, then I decided one day to make him look it up. He got quite upset with me, and said, You know, why don't you just tell me? To which I replied, Give a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime. While I do my best to be nice, that doesn't mean I expect others to. As a matter of fact, saying that they should is really placing my standards of conduct upon them, something I don't have the right to do, and neither do you. While if we all lived in a perfect world, people would never get upset and say cross things, this isn't the perfect world, and some people, and yes even those that have the greatest knowledge of all, sometimes just say mean things, my heartfelt suggestion is either learn to deal with it, or unsubscribe from the list. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Being nice has nothing to do with it. Being big assholes (not specifically anybody) has everything to do with it. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. Hell, I remember my first question on this list, I was told succinctly by Ed Crowley to read the FAQ, check the knowledgebase, and if I still had questions, then ask them, BUT UNDER NO MEANS SHOULD I EVER ASK SUCH A STUPID QUESTION AGAIN WITHOUT FIRST TRYING TO FIND THE ANSWER. The long and the short of it is this, (Paraphrashing ED), if you want to be treated nice, call PSS. If you want the answers, first try and find out the information on your own, read the FAQ, search the archives, look into technet, then and only then, ask your question here. I guess what I'm saying, is life is hard, and sometimes ppl get a bit tired of answering questions that are quite easily answered if you only do the research first. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus
Bounce Problem
Hi list: I have a user with this odd situation: He regularly emails people both inside and outside our organization (the organization includes 9 separate sites scattered around the country). He has a personal DL in his Contacts that includes only external addresses. He uses that, then manually adds some additional organizational addresses he needs, to the To: line. When he sends the email, some of the internal addressees bounce back (as at the bottom of this message). He then sends the original email to the bounced folks, individually, and it goes fine. So the problem only crops up when he addresses a message to both internal and external recipients. Any suggestsions for what might be going on? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:25 PM To: Madeline Haggans; Josefina Castillo Subject:Undeliverable: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Sent: 5/15/02 2:25 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Madeline Haggans on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL Josefina Castillo on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Read the FAQ, search technet, read the archives. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? True.. How do you change the service account password again? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Actually, since this list is free, and anyone can come here and ask a question, I don't think anyone has a right to say, Don't talk to me that way. Don't get me wrong, I don't like it much either when Mr. Ely gets his panties in a wad and goes hog out on me, but then I also don't like it when someone signs onto the list and asks, How can I change the admin account password?, which has been asked at least 500 times and the answer is out there to be found. I have a very good friend whom I was managing and he had this really bad habit of always asking me How big can a DIM field be? (Extra credit if you know a. What language we are talking about, b. What the answer is) I used to just spout the answer off without thinking about it, then I decided one day to make him look it up. He got quite upset with me, and said, You know, why don't you just tell me? To which I replied, Give a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime. While I do my best to be nice, that doesn't mean I expect others to. As a matter of fact, saying that they should is really placing my standards of conduct upon them, something I don't have the right to do, and neither do you. While if we all lived in a perfect world, people would never get upset and say cross things, this isn't the perfect world, and some people, and yes even those that have the greatest knowledge of all, sometimes just say mean things, my heartfelt suggestion is either learn to deal with it, or unsubscribe from the list. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Being nice has nothing to do with it. Being big assholes (not specifically anybody) has everything to do with it. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. Hell, I remember my first question on this list, I was told succinctly by Ed Crowley to read the FAQ, check the knowledgebase, and if I still had questions, then ask them, BUT UNDER NO MEANS SHOULD I EVER ASK SUCH A STUPID QUESTION AGAIN WITHOUT FIRST TRYING TO FIND THE ANSWER. The long and the short of it is this, (Paraphrashing ED), if you want to be treated nice, call PSS. If you want the answers, first try and find out the information on your own, read the FAQ, search the archives, look into technet, then and only then, ask your question here. I guess what I'm saying, is life is hard, and sometimes ppl get a bit tired of answering questions that are quite easily answered if you only do the research first. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
You want it in the usual place? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Ok, but please, not the face. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY *yawn* I believe this argument and every possible variant thereof can be found in the archives... Since only 3 ppl decided to purchase a copy of the archives last quarter that means most of you will just have to take my word for it. If y'all can't find more original arguments I'm afraid I'm going to have to open up my bag and bring out ThE sTiCk[tm]. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. It is funny, I am on an SMS list with some absolutely amazing technical people and there isn't the same incredible attitude problem, no matter how any times the same question gets asked. Perhaps you just take as much pride in being rude, as you do in your exchange knowledge. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Short version: Bite me. Long version: No, the fundamental difference is that I would have done some research first, documented what I _had_ done in any message that I sent out, which I would do only having read any appropriate FAQ's, I wouldn't post the request more than once, I wouldn't flag it as urgent, and I wouldn't expect list members to drop everything to help me out. And if I _did_ consider it urgent, then I'd drop a dime and call in MS support. But then again, that's just me, and that's kinda why I answer questions (sometimes) rather than asking them. On the other hand, the original post, and your response, are one of the reasons that I don't hang around here very much anymore. Or why a lot of other very experienced and knowledgeable folks either (a) don't play here any more, or (b) have more intelligent places to play. Gary -Original Message- From: Michael Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY No need for that mate..lets see when you have a simlar situation with active directory and I am as sympathetic as you have been.. From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:49:51 +0100 Ooh! Ooh! Look everybody, it's URGENT and he posted it twice! Jeez... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We recently had an issue where we had to rebuild exchange 5.5 and restore mailbox's etc back into it. We suffered considerable downtime which has now possed the question of disaster recovery. We have a domain with a pdc and bdc (NT4 server) and have created a bdc off site which is part of the domain and is synchronising remotely. I need to come up with a good disaster recover for the exchange server. We are using veritas backup which is backing up private store, public store and one other folder. Could someone suggest the best way of handling this. The exchange server cannot be taken offline. I have looked at exmerge but am not sure if this would copy permissions etc if the edb's are in use. Is there a way of creating a second exchange 5.5 remotely and mirroring the accounts of the original exchange. (Exact copy - but the backup exchange server does not function unless the other one goes down.) Please help - I am in grave danger. Thanks Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
RE: Virus Attack ??
I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Agreed. My autographed copy of Managing Microsoft Exchange Server is here by my left hand. I don't touch the server without it. Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the urgent flag. This triggers an immediate site visit from The Queen of England, who has recently completed her MCSE (some people say she used braindumps). -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? True.. How do you change the service account password again? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Actually, since this list is free, and anyone can come here and ask a question, I don't think anyone has a right to say, Don't talk to me that way. Don't get me wrong, I don't like it much either when Mr. Ely gets his panties in a wad and goes hog out on me, but then I also don't like it when someone signs onto the list and asks, How can I change the admin account password?, which has been asked at least 500 times and the answer is out there to be found. I have a very good friend whom I was managing and he had this really bad habit of always asking me How big can a DIM field be? (Extra credit if you know a. What language we are talking about, b. What the answer is) I used to just spout the answer off without thinking about it, then I decided one day to make him look it up. He got quite upset with me, and said, You know, why don't you just tell me? To which I replied, Give a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime. While I do my best to be nice, that doesn't mean I expect others to. As a matter of fact, saying that they should is really placing my standards of conduct upon them, something I don't have the right to do, and neither do you. While if we all lived in a perfect world, people would never get upset and say cross things, this isn't the perfect world, and some people, and yes even those that have the greatest knowledge of all, sometimes just say mean things, my heartfelt suggestion is either learn to deal with it, or unsubscribe from the list. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Being nice has nothing to do with it. Being big assholes (not specifically anybody) has everything to do with it. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. Hell, I remember my first question on this list, I was told succinctly by Ed Crowley to read the FAQ, check the knowledgebase, and if I still had questions, then ask them, BUT UNDER NO MEANS SHOULD I EVER ASK SUCH A STUPID QUESTION AGAIN WITHOUT FIRST TRYING TO FIND THE ANSWER. The long and the short of it is this, (Paraphrashing ED), if you want to be treated nice, call PSS. If you want the answers, first try and find out the information on your own, read the FAQ, search the archives, look into technet, then and only then, ask your question here. I guess what I'm saying, is life is hard, and sometimes ppl get a bit tired of answering questions that are quite easily answered if you only do the research first. Just my opinion, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? This has NEVER been the Be Kind to the Clueless List. ALL members are expected to do some research before asking a question, and are expected to actually CONTRIBUTE to the list when their area of expertise is crossed. If you have no area of expertise, you need to find the Care Bear List. Once upon a time, this list had several self-appointed enforcers that kept it that way. As it happened, they were also amongst the most eloquent, best-informed contributors. Now that they've gone on to greener pastures, we read more and more questions like What happens if I pull the plug out of the back of the server? Is that bad? Perhaps we should put a fund together and pay CJ to come back every few days Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Lanee Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You are so kind to people. I hope they are just as kind to you in return! Lanee Hicks, MCSE, CNE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
We actually do award points over at the Secret Cabal [1] for funniest posts. [1] Which does not exist. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Never said I wanted that. I just think so of you people need to get some personal skills. If you don't like helping people don't do it, but if you don't mind, why the attitude? Don't bother answering, it is a rhetorical question. We all get annoyed in answering the same question time and time again, but be a little constructive. I am not being critical, I will leave that to the *experts*, I just don't understand why there is this big attitude problem. Some of the emails spend more space whinging and complaining about people writing stupid questions, then they do giving answers. Gary's post was just one example. Why write Bite me? Why make the smart-arse comment in the first place? Why not just ignore it? Why not just write Read the FAQ or Read the on-line help. The following quote is from section 1.11 in the FAQ: A: None whatsoever. While you may be tempted to wrest mirth from such an annoyance as someone bothering 4000 other subscribers with a test message, there is absolutely nothing you can post in response that will ameliorate this particular trespass. Whatever you are thinking of saying, be it You failed or Did I pass? has surely been said before, and perhaps was not a knee-slapper in the first place. Just let it go. Please explain why it is unacceptable to bother 4000 other subscribers with a test message, but not unacceptable to bother 4000 odd subscribers with unproductive and ridiculous drivel like some of the stuff we see on the list in response to genuine queries (even if the answer is in the manual/help!). Do you think you are cool or something by sending these sorts of messages? Is there some sort of competition where you have an award for the person who can flame the most posters? I don't know, I thought most people here were working for a living, but some of these emails could have come from a primary school. Bottom line is, there is a difference between being short with someone, where you can answer the question and point them in the right direction and make sure they know they screwed up by not checking in the first place, and the stupid emails with contribute nothing. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Virus Attack ??
I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
There is no Cabal. Please remember that Erik. I'd hate for something nasty to happen. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We actually do award points over at the Secret Cabal [1] for funniest posts. [1] Which does not exist. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Never said I wanted that. I just think so of you people need to get some personal skills. If you don't like helping people don't do it, but if you don't mind, why the attitude? Don't bother answering, it is a rhetorical question. We all get annoyed in answering the same question time and time again, but be a little constructive. I am not being critical, I will leave that to the *experts*, I just don't understand why there is this big attitude problem. Some of the emails spend more space whinging and complaining about people writing stupid questions, then they do giving answers. Gary's post was just one example. Why write Bite me? Why make the smart-arse comment in the first place? Why not just ignore it? Why not just write Read the FAQ or Read the on-line help. The following quote is from section 1.11 in the FAQ: A: None whatsoever. While you may be tempted to wrest mirth from such an annoyance as someone bothering 4000 other subscribers with a test message, there is absolutely nothing you can post in response that will ameliorate this particular trespass. Whatever you are thinking of saying, be it You failed or Did I pass? has surely been said before, and perhaps was not a knee-slapper in the first place. Just let it go. Please explain why it is unacceptable to bother 4000 other subscribers with a test message, but not unacceptable to bother 4000 odd subscribers with unproductive and ridiculous drivel like some of the stuff we see on the list in response to genuine queries (even if the answer is in the manual/help!). Do you think you are cool or something by sending these sorts of messages? Is there some sort of competition where you have an award for the person who can flame the most posters? I don't know, I thought most people here were working for a living, but some of these emails could have come from a primary school. Bottom line is, there is a difference between being short with someone, where you can answer the question and point them in the right direction and make sure they know they screwed up by not checking in the first place, and the stupid emails with contribute nothing. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system.
RE: Bounce Problem
Are we sure he doesn't have those internal folks in his personal or contacts? That would supercede any GAL entries you might have for them. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bounce Problem Hi list: I have a user with this odd situation: He regularly emails people both inside and outside our organization (the organization includes 9 separate sites scattered around the country). He has a personal DL in his Contacts that includes only external addresses. He uses that, then manually adds some additional organizational addresses he needs, to the To: line. When he sends the email, some of the internal addressees bounce back (as at the bottom of this message). He then sends the original email to the bounced folks, individually, and it goes fine. So the problem only crops up when he addresses a message to both internal and external recipients. Any suggestsions for what might be going on? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:25 PM To: Madeline Haggans; Josefina Castillo Subject:Undeliverable: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Sent: 5/15/02 2:25 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Madeline Haggans on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL Josefina Castillo on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
flip flip flip I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
I did not use braindumps for my MCSE. And anyway, I'm Welsh! Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the urgent flag. This triggers an immediate site visit from The Queen of England, who has recently completed her MCSE (some people say she used braindumps). -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? True.. How do you change the service account password again? The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Oh, yeah. I just looked at it. Do you, like uh, get a royalty for every copy sold? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
-Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Agreed. My autographed copy of Managing Microsoft Exchange Server is here by my left hand. I don't touch the server without it. Doesn't that affect your typing? ;-) -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
I wish Citi would go Windows 98! ;) -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Getting back to the problem, I think you should use Outlook to look at the Internet headers of one of the messages that had its attachment stripped. You should be able to see in there the ip address of the sending PC. -Peter -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 17:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Hi all.. I'm using Exchange 5.5. It's multiple users. Email auto generate by multiple user. For e.g. My address book have [EMAIL PROTECTED],and etc. Even thought this user (abc) did not switch on the pc, there was still have mail from his mailbox send to other people. But i have scanned this user pc, no virus detected. Below is e.g. of the mssg is normal alert generate by Exchange to all the administrator. I cant found any clues from the msg, i have ask the Victor :- user whether did he send mail..but he said no. Sender of the infected attachment: Victor_Hoon Recipient of the infected attachment: Ho Ping Ping\Inbox Subject of the message: Powered by One or more attachments were deleted. Attachment color.exe was Deleted for the following reasons: Virus UNAUTHORIZED FILE was found. This msg is generated because we had blocked the *.exe HELP -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? It might be the klez virus, which likes to spoof messages from postmaster. Usually these spoofed messages come from outside and don't indicate an infection inside the domain. Look at the headers of the messages to get an idea of where they are really coming from -Peter -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? One user or multiple users? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be notified that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Might be on that E2K list, but I haven't heard from him in quite awhile. Especially not on the Secret Cabal List. [1] [1] There is no cabal. [2] [3] [2] If there was, he'd be in it. [3] Is there? -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
g -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? flip flip flip I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended
RE: Virus Attack ??
IF they ever do, would you mind if I dropped in on the day you start your conversion process? I would like to see the things a big corporation has to go through to get their mailboxes over. I only had 200 mailboxes, and just did them by saving them to PST, then reloading them on the server we were going to put in place of the old server. Thanks :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Last time I asked, he swore the check was in the post. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Oh, yeah. I just looked at it. Do you, like uh, get a royalty for every copy sold? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk
RE: Virus Attack ??
Actually most of them are NT. They don't know how to work it, but there it is. It takes them 20 minutes to boot up because of all the errors they have to F1 past, click OK on, etc. Bios errors, driver errors, they don't care. The bulk of the company Citi bought when they bought us (now known as Legacy Associates) are all Win95. We're going to roll out W2K Pro later this year here, but as far as I know Dallas and Irving are going to stay Win95. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go Windows 98! ;) -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bounce Problem
Good question. I'll check. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bounce Problem Are we sure he doesn't have those internal folks in his personal or contacts? That would supercede any GAL entries you might have for them. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bounce Problem Hi list: I have a user with this odd situation: He regularly emails people both inside and outside our organization (the organization includes 9 separate sites scattered around the country). He has a personal DL in his Contacts that includes only external addresses. He uses that, then manually adds some additional organizational addresses he needs, to the To: line. When he sends the email, some of the internal addressees bounce back (as at the bottom of this message). He then sends the original email to the bounced folks, individually, and it goes fine. So the problem only crops up when he addresses a message to both internal and external recipients. Any suggestsions for what might be going on? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:25 PM To: Madeline Haggans; Josefina Castillo Subject:Undeliverable: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Sent: 5/15/02 2:25 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Madeline Haggans on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL Josefina Castillo on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Well, 90% of Citi is on Openmail, so I plan to recommend that they call Andy Webb to help them with that! The Exchange sites were all purchased through company buyouts and so far (touch my touchstone) they are leaving us alone. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? IF they ever do, would you mind if I dropped in on the day you start your conversion process? I would like to see the things a big corporation has to go through to get their mailboxes over. I only had 200 mailboxes, and just did them by saving them to PST, then reloading them on the server we were going to put in place of the old server. Thanks :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
The proper response to your question is of course, Why do you assume that managing the character of this list is under your purview? Why do you assume that your advice is wanted or apreciated It's a very active list and has many members. Obviously your opinion that there is an atitude problem is the minority view. Jim Helfer (Who can almost never answer any questions,but has learned a lot) -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Never said I wanted that. I just think so of you people need to get some personal skills. If you don't like helping people don't do it, but if you don't mind, why the attitude? Don't bother answering, it is a rhetorical question. We all get annoyed in answering the same question time and time again, but be a little constructive. I am not being critical, I will leave that to the *experts*, I just don't understand why there is this big attitude problem. Some of the emails spend more space whinging and complaining about people writing stupid questions, then they do giving answers. Gary's post was just one example. Why write Bite me? Why make the smart-arse comment in the first place? Why not just ignore it? Why not just write Read the FAQ or Read the on-line help. The following quote is from section 1.11 in the FAQ: A: None whatsoever. While you may be tempted to wrest mirth from such an annoyance as someone bothering 4000 other subscribers with a test message, there is absolutely nothing you can post in response that will ameliorate this particular trespass. Whatever you are thinking of saying, be it You failed or Did I pass? has surely been said before, and perhaps was not a knee-slapper in the first place. Just let it go. Please explain why it is unacceptable to bother 4000 other subscribers with a test message, but not unacceptable to bother 4000 odd subscribers with unproductive and ridiculous drivel like some of the stuff we see on the list in response to genuine queries (even if the answer is in the manual/help!). Do you think you are cool or something by sending these sorts of messages? Is there some sort of competition where you have an award for the person who can flame the most posters? I don't know, I thought most people here were working for a living, but some of these emails could have come from a primary school. Bottom line is, there is a difference between being short with someone, where you can answer the question and point them in the right direction and make sure they know they screwed up by not checking in the first place, and the stupid emails with contribute nothing. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system.
RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
TINSB [1] [1] There is no Secret Cabal [2] [2] Which does not exist -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY We actually do award points over at the Secret Cabal [1] for funniest posts. [1] Which does not exist. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Never said I wanted that. I just think so of you people need to get some personal skills. If you don't like helping people don't do it, but if you don't mind, why the attitude? Don't bother answering, it is a rhetorical question. We all get annoyed in answering the same question time and time again, but be a little constructive. I am not being critical, I will leave that to the *experts*, I just don't understand why there is this big attitude problem. Some of the emails spend more space whinging and complaining about people writing stupid questions, then they do giving answers. Gary's post was just one example. Why write Bite me? Why make the smart-arse comment in the first place? Why not just ignore it? Why not just write Read the FAQ or Read the on-line help. The following quote is from section 1.11 in the FAQ: A: None whatsoever. While you may be tempted to wrest mirth from such an annoyance as someone bothering 4000 other subscribers with a test message, there is absolutely nothing you can post in response that will ameliorate this particular trespass. Whatever you are thinking of saying, be it You failed or Did I pass? has surely been said before, and perhaps was not a knee-slapper in the first place. Just let it go. Please explain why it is unacceptable to bother 4000 other subscribers with a test message, but not unacceptable to bother 4000 odd subscribers with unproductive and ridiculous drivel like some of the stuff we see on the list in response to genuine queries (even if the answer is in the manual/help!). Do you think you are cool or something by sending these sorts of messages? Is there some sort of competition where you have an award for the person who can flame the most posters? I don't know, I thought most people here were working for a living, but some of these emails could have come from a primary school. Bottom line is, there is a difference between being short with someone, where you can answer the question and point them in the right direction and make sure they know they screwed up by not checking in the first place, and the stupid emails with contribute nothing. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY Yeah, they can piss people off elsewhere. While there are some people on this list who obviously know a great deal about Exchange, it seems inversely-proportional to people skills. You want Care Bear support. Next list on the left. This is Exchange Discussions. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system.
RE: Smtp connector gone mad?
You have an SMTP conenctor why? -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:19 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? Subject: Smtp connector gone mad? We have an exchange 2000 server that we joined to the Exchange 5.5 org/site. When I setup an smtp connector on the exchange 2000 server (including adding all the domain names I want, mail from the exchange 5.5 server directed to the exchange 2000 users gets picked up by the smtp connector and eventually ends up in the queue undeliverable messages?? When I delete the smtp connector everything goes back to normal. What tick box have I missed? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Securing Outlook
Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5
Change switches... Check large packet pings... Etc -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:13 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5 Subject: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5 We did a couple of changes on our network (ISP change, IP address change, added firewall), soon after that we started to have undeliverables emails when emails have more than 1Mb attach. Now we have same problem but with all emails with attachments (no matter the size). It's on and off, I mean sometimes it delivered the email and sometimes it won't. Any ideas about what can be the problem? Thanks. Jorge Cardenas. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a
Upgrade Exchange SP2 to SP4 Upgrade NT SP4 to SP6a Problem should disappear -Original Message- From: Neil Luczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:52 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a Subject: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a Anyone out there had problems upgrading an NT4 box at Sp4 running Exch 5.5 Sp2 to NT4Sp6a. We recently done this on our servers and all the NT4Sp6a boxes could not make external RPC connections. Exchange boxes still on NT4Sp4 could connect OK to the Sp6a boxes, but not vice versa. Any help or ideas gratefully recieved. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
The Ms Exchange 2000 is a hottie! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? flip flip flip I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
OWA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield : Exchange Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
CTRL-ALT-DEL -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
Set her authentication type to None instead of Password. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
er, lock the workstation? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Securing Outlook
What's wrong with using OWA? I am not familiar with Zetafax. Does it require an Outlook client up and running? - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
Then anyone can go in and change it back. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Set her authentication type to None instead of Password. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
You misheard. He just swore. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 May 2002 16:48 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Virus Attack ?? Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Last time I asked, he swore the check was in the post. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Oh, yeah. I just looked at it. Do you, like uh, get a royalty for every copy sold? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Securing Outlook
Ditto on the separate PC - Original Message - From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:10 PM Subject: RE: Securing Outlook -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice From her outlook session - Tools, email accounts, click next on view/change existing accounts, select her exchange session and click change. More settings, advanced tab, set logon network security to none. Anyone opening outlook on that login now needs to supply her windows username and password. You might want to see if you can setup another computer for zetafax to use which doesn't need her to be sat in front of it. Sounds like an awfully clumsy system to me. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Dogs have owners, Cats have staff -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
We use Zetafax, but have all the faxes being received by a public folder. The folder is then seen as a 'virtual' fax machine ie if you are waiting on a fax, look in the folder. If you see faxes for someone else, distribute. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear This machine is intended for anyone to walk onto to forward faxes, Zetafax sends all faxes to a default logon, so this machine needs to be logged on in her username so the faxes go to it -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook er, lock the workstation? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
You might be right. I still haven't had that cheque -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? You misheard. He just swore. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 May 2002 16:48 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Virus Attack ?? Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Last time I asked, he swore the check was in the post. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Oh, yeah. I just looked at it. Do you, like uh, get a royalty for every copy sold? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
Sorry, Zetafax doesn't need outlook, it can use it, but we're using the Zetafax client Its just a matter of being logged on with her username so the Zetafax client will pick up all faxes (all incoming faxes go to her username) I want to stop anyone being able to open Outlook which will, by virtue of her being logged on still, open her info store -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 05:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Securing Outlook What's wrong with using OWA? I am not familiar with Zetafax. Does it require an Outlook client up and running? - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
