RE: Address Book Views
Disclaimer: I haven't worked with address book views in years, I'm tired and I'm cranky. Let's establish what the goals are here. Do the users from each company currently see each other in the GAL? Should they? I'll answer the rest once I know the answer to the previous quesion(s), but the short answer is that unless there are some things in place which aren't mentioned the plan below does not appear to meet the desired objectives (yet). -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 5/17/2002 5:12 PM Subject: Address Book Views I think I know what I'm doing, but I just want to make sure, before I do it. I would also like to know what effect this is going to have on what my users see. If I really don't know what I'm doing, please feel free to correct my ignorance in whatever fashion you feel necessary (flames, links to reading, helpful tips, etc). I am currently reading Paul Robichaux's book, "Managing MS Exchange Server", Chapter 9, pgs 322-330. CONFIGURATION: -Ex5.5, SP4 / Win2k, SP2 -Organization consists of two sites...let's call them A & B. -Both sites have a single Recipient container (right now) that replicate to the GAL. -The two companies that share this organization have nothing to do with each other. They are completely separate companies, that due to both being government subcontractors on the same site, share the same Exchange organization. SITUATION: - I'm going to create a "Corporate" recipient container in our site, Site B. - In the initial ABV that I create, on the Group By tab, I'm going to set the "Group Items by" option to Site, then City. - On the Advanced tab, I'm going to uncheck the "Promote entries to parent containers" option. - I am then going to import the .csv file containing the e-mail addresses of all our employees around the world as Custom Recipients (approx. 22,500 & 11 mb worth of contacts) into the new "Corporate" recipient container I created for Site B. OUTCOME: I'm hoping that this will allow me to: 1) Create the new container; 2) Import all these contacts into the container; 3) Have the container name show up in the other site, but they won't be able to see any of the recipients. Did I get it right? Jim Blunt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ultimate wierdness
Until you figure it out, have folks log on as domain\user, as they would if they were using Windows XP/ IE or Netscape v.Anything. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:41 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ultimate wierdness Subject: RE: ultimate wierdness I may be wrong, but the first place I would start, is with your web admin. Ask that person if they checked the box for setting the default logon domain to whatever your domain name is. I'm not sure off the top of my head, where the setting is. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ultimate wierdness all of a sudden this afternoon, my OWA (exchange 2000) started prompting only for name and password, rather than name, password and domain... what could have caused this? Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message filter in exch5.5
hey eric. try specify by host: ip 210.0.0.0.0 mask255.0.0.0 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filter in exch5.5 Got it, I know pretty much how to block whatever, that's not an issue. But I want to specifically block a A class IP... the whole range. I'll try the #@[210.1.1.1] but I would think the last octet would indicate a single host. Maybe something like 210.#.#.# ?? e- -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filter in exch5.5 Connections -> IMS -> Connections -> Message Filtering -> Add - If you want to block everything from a specific SMTP addy, type [EMAIL PROTECTED], as an example. - If you want to block everything from a specific domain, type @nowhere.com - If you want to block everything from a specific IP, type in xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filter in exch5.5 TurfDir? It filters by address or domain. The only wildcard I'm aware of is #. e.g. #@lovelyporn.com will block any sender from that domain. You may be able to use #@[210.1.1.1] You could risk blocking legitimate traffic if you block whole subnets. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message filter in exch5.5 Hi Does the message filter in the IMS for exchange except wildcards? I'm thinking it doesn't. I got a press release from our security group and being in the healthcare industry they jump on security issues, anyway this release said that 40% of the worlds spam traffic comes from korea, the majority of spam traffic to my server is in fact from korea, or more specifically 210 "A" classes. I put '210.0.0.0" per request by the security group but just this morning we saw some lovely porn from 210.114.174.121. Is there a way to do wildcards? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
"Help" of the sort you clearly need is only available from licensed practitioners. ERROR: ID-10-T. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 18:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday Help would be greatly appreciated. > -Original Message- > From: Jerig, Tony > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:48 PM > To: Burke, Sean; Gilligan, Todd; Coomer, Chris; Weber, Rick; Woodruff, > Michael; Shumway, Neal; Rhodes, Kevin; Brown, Ted; Biller, Bradley; > Wright, Aaron; Abner, Mary; Hingsbergen, Kathleen > Subject: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > I will be out of the office Monday for vacation and Tuesday visiting > HPM. Thought I would send out a couple of quizzes to offer up the > office while I am out. > > Here is the first quiz. First person to email me the correct answer > gets the office for Monday. I will send a second quiz for Tuesday's > lodging. > > Quiz #1: > > Both of these columns of numbers add up to different totals. Can you > move just one number to make the totals equal? > > 2 > 8 > 3 > 1 > 7 > 21 > > 6 > 4 > 5 > 9 > 24 > > Sorry Sean -- I don't think Google will help on this one. > > T. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message filter in exch5.5
Got it, I know pretty much how to block whatever, that's not an issue. But I want to specifically block a A class IP... the whole range. I'll try the #@[210.1.1.1] but I would think the last octet would indicate a single host. Maybe something like 210.#.#.# ?? e- -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filter in exch5.5 Connections -> IMS -> Connections -> Message Filtering -> Add - If you want to block everything from a specific SMTP addy, type [EMAIL PROTECTED], as an example. - If you want to block everything from a specific domain, type @nowhere.com - If you want to block everything from a specific IP, type in xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filter in exch5.5 TurfDir? It filters by address or domain. The only wildcard I'm aware of is #. e.g. #@lovelyporn.com will block any sender from that domain. You may be able to use #@[210.1.1.1] You could risk blocking legitimate traffic if you block whole subnets. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message filter in exch5.5 Hi Does the message filter in the IMS for exchange except wildcards? I'm thinking it doesn't. I got a press release from our security group and being in the healthcare industry they jump on security issues, anyway this release said that 40% of the worlds spam traffic comes from korea, the majority of spam traffic to my server is in fact from korea, or more specifically 210 "A" classes. I put '210.0.0.0" per request by the security group but just this morning we saw some lovely porn from 210.114.174.121. Is there a way to do wildcards? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address Book Views
I think I know what I'm doing, but I just want to make sure, before I do it. I would also like to know what effect this is going to have on what my users see. If I really don't know what I'm doing, please feel free to correct my ignorance in whatever fashion you feel necessary (flames, links to reading, helpful tips, etc). I am currently reading Paul Robichaux's book, "Managing MS Exchange Server", Chapter 9, pgs 322-330. CONFIGURATION: -Ex5.5, SP4 / Win2k, SP2 -Organization consists of two sites...let's call them A & B. -Both sites have a single Recipient container (right now) that replicate to the GAL. -The two companies that share this organization have nothing to do with each other. They are completely separate companies, that due to both being government subcontractors on the same site, share the same Exchange organization. SITUATION: - I'm going to create a "Corporate" recipient container in our site, Site B. - In the initial ABV that I create, on the Group By tab, I'm going to set the "Group Items by" option to Site, then City. - On the Advanced tab, I'm going to uncheck the "Promote entries to parent containers" option. - I am then going to import the .csv file containing the e-mail addresses of all our employees around the world as Custom Recipients (approx. 22,500 & 11 mb worth of contacts) into the new "Corporate" recipient container I created for Site B. OUTCOME: I'm hoping that this will allow me to: 1) Create the new container; 2) Import all these contacts into the container; 3) Have the container name show up in the other site, but they won't be able to see any of the recipients. Did I get it right? Jim Blunt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge permissions problem
I don't get any hits when I search on "Error encountered getting mailbox information from the private information store etc etc" either. However, searching on "exmerge mailbox information private information store" yields Q288446 among others which seem like they might be relevant. -- Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE MessageOne 512-652-4500 x244 Nana korobi, ya oki. > -Original Message- > From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exmerge permissions problem > > > Been there. Searched microsoft and google with no success. I > have exhausted all avenues that I know of. Now I guess I just > need to hear from someone that has been down this road as well. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge permissions problem
Been there. Searched microsoft and google with no success. I have exhausted all avenues that I know of. Now I guess I just need to hear from someone that has been down this road as well. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge permissions problem
Might try TechNet and the FAQ. > -Original Message- > From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:47 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exmerge permissions problem > > > I am trying to complete my exchange migration. I have run > exmerge in two step mode and completed the first step. Now > when I try to run step 2 I am getting Error encountered > getting mailbox information from the private information > store etc etc... Well I have checked permissions in system > manager> Administrative groups > First Administrative group > >servers and > made sure that my administrator account and all groups that > my account is a member of have all the permissions available. > Did that same for system > manager> Administrative groups > First Administrative group >servers > > [server] > first storage group > mailbox store. Now I do not > see anyplace that I do not have permission to do anything > that I want but I still cannot do this. Any thoughts? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exmerge permissions problem
I am trying to complete my exchange migration. I have run exmerge in two step mode and completed the first step. Now when I try to run step 2 I am getting Error encountered getting mailbox information from the private information store etc etc... Well I have checked permissions in system manager> Administrative groups > First Administrative group >servers and made sure that my administrator account and all groups that my account is a member of have all the permissions available. Did that same for system manager> Administrative groups > First Administrative group >servers > [server] > first storage group > mailbox store. Now I do not see anyplace that I do not have permission to do anything that I want but I still cannot do this. Any thoughts? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ultimate wierdness
I may be wrong, but the first place I would start, is with your web admin. Ask that person if they checked the box for setting the default logon domain to whatever your domain name is. I'm not sure off the top of my head, where the setting is. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ultimate wierdness all of a sudden this afternoon, my OWA (exchange 2000) started prompting only for name and password, rather than name, password and domain... what could have caused this? Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ultimate wierdness
If you set the default domain setting in IIS is wont prompt. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ultimate wierdness all of a sudden this afternoon, my OWA (exchange 2000) started prompting only for name and password, rather than name, password and domain... what could have caused this? Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ultimate wierdness
all of a sudden this afternoon, my OWA (exchange 2000) started prompting only for name and password, rather than name, password and domain... what could have caused this? Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message filter in exch5.5
Connections -> IMS -> Connections -> Message Filtering -> Add - If you want to block everything from a specific SMTP addy, type [EMAIL PROTECTED], as an example. - If you want to block everything from a specific domain, type @nowhere.com - If you want to block everything from a specific IP, type in xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filter in exch5.5 TurfDir? It filters by address or domain. The only wildcard I'm aware of is #. e.g. #@lovelyporn.com will block any sender from that domain. You may be able to use #@[210.1.1.1] You could risk blocking legitimate traffic if you block whole subnets. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message filter in exch5.5 Hi Does the message filter in the IMS for exchange except wildcards? I'm thinking it doesn't. I got a press release from our security group and being in the healthcare industry they jump on security issues, anyway this release said that 40% of the worlds spam traffic comes from korea, the majority of spam traffic to my server is in fact from korea, or more specifically 210 "A" classes. I put '210.0.0.0" per request by the security group but just this morning we saw some lovely porn from 210.114.174.121. Is there a way to do wildcards? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message filter in exch5.5
TurfDir? It filters by address or domain. The only wildcard I'm aware of is #. e.g. #@lovelyporn.com will block any sender from that domain. You may be able to use #@[210.1.1.1] You could risk blocking legitimate traffic if you block whole subnets. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message filter in exch5.5 Hi Does the message filter in the IMS for exchange except wildcards? I'm thinking it doesn't. I got a press release from our security group and being in the healthcare industry they jump on security issues, anyway this release said that 40% of the worlds spam traffic comes from korea, the majority of spam traffic to my server is in fact from korea, or more specifically 210 "A" classes. I put '210.0.0.0" per request by the security group but just this morning we saw some lovely porn from 210.114.174.121. Is there a way to do wildcards? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's
You need to use the AD users and Computers snapin that comes with Exchange, not the default AD users and computers snapin, it doesn't have the exchange options. You should find it on the start menu -> Programs -> Microsoft Exchange -> Active Directory Users and Computers rick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus/Spam filtering
Mmmm...Dont let some new buggy program scare you off. Go get Trend ScanMail. Then send me a beer when you decide how much you love it. -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering Are you referring to the exchange scanner? If so we were using Sophos's new product called MailMonitor for Exchange. We would get it installed, configure it, try to start the real time scanning and it would error out. Then, tech support would have us uninstall and re-install. While doing the uninstall it would un-register some dll's the other software was using and crash our intranet. It was a real mess, and we were not getting any where with them. We finally gave them a deadline to get it working by and they did not deliver so a few days after the deadline we pulled the plug. N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering I'm curious as to what product you were using that had so many problems. What was it? -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering That is our current plan, we also have Sophos on the desktop, and other that having some problems with a few win98 clients updating, they have done very well. They also just introduced a virus scanner for exchange, but after they worked on a problem we were having with for two months with no solution we pulled the plug on it and decided to go with Virus and Spam filtering. Because of throughput issues, and other interaction issues with our mail server we have been instructed to look into a SMTP scanner running in front of our exchange server, also making a policy change that will not allow users to use outlook to check there external account. (I know not the most secure way to do it but that was the decision made). N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering This is true. We use Mailsweeper for SMTP and Sophos for Desktop scanning. We don't use any server side AV. I totally argree with Martin. If you plan on using gateway and desktop only, you better be on top of it 24/7. Sophos is a damn good product though. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering While gateway scanning is great, you would be much better off with something on the Exchange server itself. Here is one scenario as to why. User logs into Hotmail and downloads a virus and the desktop AV doesn't catch it. It grabs the list from the GAL and hammers the mail server. You are now fully infected. I would definitely look at something for the Exchange server as a primary, gateway is secondary. -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus/Spam filtering I have been given the task of finding and evaluating a SMTP Virus/Spam filter for our company. What products do you recommend? We are running one exchange server with about 700 mailboxes. We want to go gateway scanning so that the scanner is not residing on the exchange server. The two products we have been looking at in particular are Interscan Virus wall suite by Trend Micro and MailMarshall by Marshall software. Any suggestions/recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To uns
Message filter in exch5.5
Hi Does the message filter in the IMS for exchange except wildcards? I'm thinking it doesn't. I got a press release from our security group and being in the healthcare industry they jump on security issues, anyway this release said that 40% of the worlds spam traffic comes from korea, the majority of spam traffic to my server is in fact from korea, or more specifically 210 "A" classes. I put '210.0.0.0" per request by the security group but just this morning we saw some lovely porn from 210.114.174.121. Is there a way to do wildcards? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus/Spam filtering
Are you referring to the exchange scanner? If so we were using Sophos's new product called MailMonitor for Exchange. We would get it installed, configure it, try to start the real time scanning and it would error out. Then, tech support would have us uninstall and re-install. While doing the uninstall it would un-register some dll's the other software was using and crash our intranet. It was a real mess, and we were not getting any where with them. We finally gave them a deadline to get it working by and they did not deliver so a few days after the deadline we pulled the plug. N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering I'm curious as to what product you were using that had so many problems. What was it? -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering That is our current plan, we also have Sophos on the desktop, and other that having some problems with a few win98 clients updating, they have done very well. They also just introduced a virus scanner for exchange, but after they worked on a problem we were having with for two months with no solution we pulled the plug on it and decided to go with Virus and Spam filtering. Because of throughput issues, and other interaction issues with our mail server we have been instructed to look into a SMTP scanner running in front of our exchange server, also making a policy change that will not allow users to use outlook to check there external account. (I know not the most secure way to do it but that was the decision made). N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering This is true. We use Mailsweeper for SMTP and Sophos for Desktop scanning. We don't use any server side AV. I totally argree with Martin. If you plan on using gateway and desktop only, you better be on top of it 24/7. Sophos is a damn good product though. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering While gateway scanning is great, you would be much better off with something on the Exchange server itself. Here is one scenario as to why. User logs into Hotmail and downloads a virus and the desktop AV doesn't catch it. It grabs the list from the GAL and hammers the mail server. You are now fully infected. I would definitely look at something for the Exchange server as a primary, gateway is secondary. -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus/Spam filtering I have been given the task of finding and evaluating a SMTP Virus/Spam filter for our company. What products do you recommend? We are running one exchange server with about 700 mailboxes. We want to go gateway scanning so that the scanner is not residing on the exchange server. The two products we have been looking at in particular are Interscan Virus wall suite by Trend Micro and MailMarshall by Marshall software. Any suggestions/recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Conference Board Calendar
If you are using Auto Accept, remove and readd the script. It will work again. Leave the folders that you don't know alone. They provide functions for Outlook. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No I don't think so. Honestly, I don't think I did. Also what is the folder called Reminder? I see that when I open the calendar using GWClient. Also now when I send out a meeting request, the conference room doesn't automatically accepts or rejects the meetings. Any reason why? Thanks again for all your help. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Did you move them back to the calendar after you moved them with the GW Client? You might have dropped them somewhere else on accident. I do that sometimes. Look in the mailbox in every folder. Use the GW Clent to look also. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No! they are not showing up at all. Any where. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Why do you think they are gone? They aren't showing up? Anywhere? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar It worked great. Thank you. Thank you. My final question. How come all the recurring meetings are gone? Any thing that I should do to get it back? Please advice. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy from the command line. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thank you so much for your help. I found the culprit and now I am able to access the Calendar. I do have one more question though. For some reason, eventhough there is no appointment set on most of the days in the future. i.e. next month and so forth. Almost all of those days are highlighted as if they have an appointment scheduled for those days. Any reason why? And any ideas on how do I go about and fix that? Thanks again Michael and everyone else who helped with this issue. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: R
RE: Conference Board Calendar
No I don't think so. Honestly, I don't think I did. Also what is the folder called Reminder? I see that when I open the calendar using GWClient. Also now when I send out a meeting request, the conference room doesn't automatically accepts or rejects the meetings. Any reason why? Thanks again for all your help. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Did you move them back to the calendar after you moved them with the GW Client? You might have dropped them somewhere else on accident. I do that sometimes. Look in the mailbox in every folder. Use the GW Clent to look also. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No! they are not showing up at all. Any where. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Why do you think they are gone? They aren't showing up? Anywhere? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar It worked great. Thank you. Thank you. My final question. How come all the recurring meetings are gone? Any thing that I should do to get it back? Please advice. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy from the command line. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thank you so much for your help. I found the culprit and now I am able to access the Calendar. I do have one more question though. For some reason, eventhough there is no appointment set on most of the days in the future. i.e. next month and so forth. Almost all of those days are highlighted as if they have an appointment scheduled for those days. Any reason why? And any ideas on how do I go about and fix that? Thanks again Michael and everyone else who helped with this issue. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the G
RE: Virus/Spam filtering
I'm curious as to what product you were using that had so many problems. What was it? -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering That is our current plan, we also have Sophos on the desktop, and other that having some problems with a few win98 clients updating, they have done very well. They also just introduced a virus scanner for exchange, but after they worked on a problem we were having with for two months with no solution we pulled the plug on it and decided to go with Virus and Spam filtering. Because of throughput issues, and other interaction issues with our mail server we have been instructed to look into a SMTP scanner running in front of our exchange server, also making a policy change that will not allow users to use outlook to check there external account. (I know not the most secure way to do it but that was the decision made). N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering This is true. We use Mailsweeper for SMTP and Sophos for Desktop scanning. We don't use any server side AV. I totally argree with Martin. If you plan on using gateway and desktop only, you better be on top of it 24/7. Sophos is a damn good product though. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering While gateway scanning is great, you would be much better off with something on the Exchange server itself. Here is one scenario as to why. User logs into Hotmail and downloads a virus and the desktop AV doesn't catch it. It grabs the list from the GAL and hammers the mail server. You are now fully infected. I would definitely look at something for the Exchange server as a primary, gateway is secondary. -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus/Spam filtering I have been given the task of finding and evaluating a SMTP Virus/Spam filter for our company. What products do you recommend? We are running one exchange server with about 700 mailboxes. We want to go gateway scanning so that the scanner is not residing on the exchange server. The two products we have been looking at in particular are Interscan Virus wall suite by Trend Micro and MailMarshall by Marshall software. Any suggestions/recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus/Spam filtering
Check out MailSweeper for SMTP. Works great for us. -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering That is our current plan, we also have Sophos on the desktop, and other that having some problems with a few win98 clients updating, they have done very well. They also just introduced a virus scanner for exchange, but after they worked on a problem we were having with for two months with no solution we pulled the plug on it and decided to go with Virus and Spam filtering. Because of throughput issues, and other interaction issues with our mail server we have been instructed to look into a SMTP scanner running in front of our exchange server, also making a policy change that will not allow users to use outlook to check there external account. (I know not the most secure way to do it but that was the decision made). N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering This is true. We use Mailsweeper for SMTP and Sophos for Desktop scanning. We don't use any server side AV. I totally argree with Martin. If you plan on using gateway and desktop only, you better be on top of it 24/7. Sophos is a damn good product though. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering While gateway scanning is great, you would be much better off with something on the Exchange server itself. Here is one scenario as to why. User logs into Hotmail and downloads a virus and the desktop AV doesn't catch it. It grabs the list from the GAL and hammers the mail server. You are now fully infected. I would definitely look at something for the Exchange server as a primary, gateway is secondary. -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus/Spam filtering I have been given the task of finding and evaluating a SMTP Virus/Spam filter for our company. What products do you recommend? We are running one exchange server with about 700 mailboxes. We want to go gateway scanning so that the scanner is not residing on the exchange server. The two products we have been looking at in particular are Interscan Virus wall suite by Trend Micro and MailMarshall by Marshall software. Any suggestions/recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS Mail migration
It probably does with our lot, but hey, you all gotta know what's really goin' on. Now about the dirt in geac. - Original Message - From: "John Matteson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 7:39 PM Subject: RE: MS Mail migration > I'd like to, but around here dirt dishing shovels come with pink slips > attached. > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, > and those who mind don't matter. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:48 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail migration > > > Give us some GEAC dirt, John. You know you want to. > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Posted At: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:46 AM > > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > > Conversation: MS Mail migration > > Subject: RE: MS Mail migration > > > > > > > > > > Oh. Never mind. > > > > > > > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > > (404) 239 - 2981 > > > > Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter > > don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: MS Mail migration > > > > > > Unfortunately for the company it's nothing that hasn't > > repeatedly been published in the IT press over here and > > Private Eye (www.private-eye.co.uk) Ad Passim, Ad Nauseam, in > > recent years. Give it a few more years and we'll be a smooth > > streamlined business > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 17 May 2002 17:13 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > > Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? > > > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > > (404) 239 - 2981 > > > > Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter > > don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
I was just going to reply with the old swap the 21 and 24 routine until John read the question right and moved only one number. Phew, glad I avoided making a fool of myself and no one found me out. - Original Message - From: "Chinnery Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 7:48 PM Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > Well, here's an interesting solution my boss sent me: > > He included the total for the first column (21) to the list of the numbers > by moving the '2' to right below the one. This then adds 3 (2+1) to the > first column giving a total equal to the second. > > 2 > 8 > 3 > 1 > 7 > > 2 > 1 > > Paul Chinnery > Network Administrator > Mem Med Ctr > > > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > > RAA! Yeah, I'm stupid. Thanks:-) > > -Original Message- > From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:02 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > > turn the 9 upside down > > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > > Help would be greatly appreciated. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jerig, Tony > > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:48 PM > > To: Burke, Sean; Gilligan, Todd; Coomer, Chris; Weber, Rick; Woodruff, > > Michael; Shumway, Neal; Rhodes, Kevin; Brown, Ted; Biller, Bradley; > > Wright, Aaron; Abner, Mary; Hingsbergen, Kathleen > > Subject: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > > > I will be out of the office Monday for vacation and Tuesday visiting > > HPM. Thought I would send out a couple of quizzes to offer up the > > office while I am out. > > > > Here is the first quiz. First person to email me the correct answer > > gets the office for Monday. I will send a second quiz for Tuesday's > > lodging. > > > > Quiz #1: > > > > Both of these columns of numbers add up to different totals. Can you > > move just one number to make the totals equal? > > > > 2 > > 8 > > 3 > > 1 > > 7 > > 21 > > > > 6 > > 4 > > 5 > > 9 > > 24 > > > > Sorry Sean -- I don't think Google will help on this one. > > > > T. > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus/Spam filtering
That is our current plan, we also have Sophos on the desktop, and other that having some problems with a few win98 clients updating, they have done very well. They also just introduced a virus scanner for exchange, but after they worked on a problem we were having with for two months with no solution we pulled the plug on it and decided to go with Virus and Spam filtering. Because of throughput issues, and other interaction issues with our mail server we have been instructed to look into a SMTP scanner running in front of our exchange server, also making a policy change that will not allow users to use outlook to check there external account. (I know not the most secure way to do it but that was the decision made). N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering This is true. We use Mailsweeper for SMTP and Sophos for Desktop scanning. We don't use any server side AV. I totally argree with Martin. If you plan on using gateway and desktop only, you better be on top of it 24/7. Sophos is a damn good product though. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering While gateway scanning is great, you would be much better off with something on the Exchange server itself. Here is one scenario as to why. User logs into Hotmail and downloads a virus and the desktop AV doesn't catch it. It grabs the list from the GAL and hammers the mail server. You are now fully infected. I would definitely look at something for the Exchange server as a primary, gateway is secondary. -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus/Spam filtering I have been given the task of finding and evaluating a SMTP Virus/Spam filter for our company. What products do you recommend? We are running one exchange server with about 700 mailboxes. We want to go gateway scanning so that the scanner is not residing on the exchange server. The two products we have been looking at in particular are Interscan Virus wall suite by Trend Micro and MailMarshall by Marshall software. Any suggestions/recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
Did you move them back to the calendar after you moved them with the GW Client? You might have dropped them somewhere else on accident. I do that sometimes. Look in the mailbox in every folder. Use the GW Clent to look also. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No! they are not showing up at all. Any where. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Why do you think they are gone? They aren't showing up? Anywhere? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar It worked great. Thank you. Thank you. My final question. How come all the recurring meetings are gone? Any thing that I should do to get it back? Please advice. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy from the command line. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thank you so much for your help. I found the culprit and now I am able to access the Calendar. I do have one more question though. For some reason, eventhough there is no appointment set on most of the days in the future. i.e. next month and so forth. Almost all of those days are highlighted as if they have an appointment scheduled for those days. Any reason why? And any ideas on how do I go about and fix that? Thanks again Michael and everyone else who helped with this issue. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject
RE: Virus/Spam filtering
This is true. We use Mailsweeper for SMTP and Sophos for Desktop scanning. We don't use any server side AV. I totally argree with Martin. If you plan on using gateway and desktop only, you better be on top of it 24/7. Sophos is a damn good product though. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering While gateway scanning is great, you would be much better off with something on the Exchange server itself. Here is one scenario as to why. User logs into Hotmail and downloads a virus and the desktop AV doesn't catch it. It grabs the list from the GAL and hammers the mail server. You are now fully infected. I would definitely look at something for the Exchange server as a primary, gateway is secondary. -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus/Spam filtering I have been given the task of finding and evaluating a SMTP Virus/Spam filter for our company. What products do you recommend? We are running one exchange server with about 700 mailboxes. We want to go gateway scanning so that the scanner is not residing on the exchange server. The two products we have been looking at in particular are Interscan Virus wall suite by Trend Micro and MailMarshall by Marshall software. Any suggestions/recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
No! they are not showing up at all. Any where. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Why do you think they are gone? They aren't showing up? Anywhere? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar It worked great. Thank you. Thank you. My final question. How come all the recurring meetings are gone? Any thing that I should do to get it back? Please advice. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy from the command line. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thank you so much for your help. I found the culprit and now I am able to access the Calendar. I do have one more question though. For some reason, eventhough there is no appointment set on most of the days in the future. i.e. next month and so forth. Almost all of those days are highlighted as if they have an appointment scheduled for those days. Any reason why? And any ideas on how do I go about and fix that? Thanks again Michael and everyone else who helped with this issue. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You mean GroupWise client? I will try that. Thanks! rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Download the GW Client from microsoft and move everything out of the calendar folder and start moving stuff back in until you figu
RE: Conference Board Calendar
Why do you think they are gone? They aren't showing up? Anywhere? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar It worked great. Thank you. Thank you. My final question. How come all the recurring meetings are gone? Any thing that I should do to get it back? Please advice. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy from the command line. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thank you so much for your help. I found the culprit and now I am able to access the Calendar. I do have one more question though. For some reason, eventhough there is no appointment set on most of the days in the future. i.e. next month and so forth. Almost all of those days are highlighted as if they have an appointment scheduled for those days. Any reason why? And any ideas on how do I go about and fix that? Thanks again Michael and everyone else who helped with this issue. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You mean GroupWise client? I will try that. Thanks! rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Download the GW Client from microsoft and move everything out of the calendar folder and start moving stuff back in until you figure out which request is the culprit. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar PST FILE??
RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
Well, here's an interesting solution my boss sent me: He included the total for the first column (21) to the list of the numbers by moving the '2' to right below the one. This then adds 3 (2+1) to the first column giving a total equal to the second. 2 8 3 1 7 2 1 Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday RAA! Yeah, I'm stupid. Thanks:-) -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday turn the 9 upside down -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday Help would be greatly appreciated. > -Original Message- > From: Jerig, Tony > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:48 PM > To: Burke, Sean; Gilligan, Todd; Coomer, Chris; Weber, Rick; Woodruff, > Michael; Shumway, Neal; Rhodes, Kevin; Brown, Ted; Biller, Bradley; > Wright, Aaron; Abner, Mary; Hingsbergen, Kathleen > Subject: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > I will be out of the office Monday for vacation and Tuesday visiting > HPM. Thought I would send out a couple of quizzes to offer up the > office while I am out. > > Here is the first quiz. First person to email me the correct answer > gets the office for Monday. I will send a second quiz for Tuesday's > lodging. > > Quiz #1: > > Both of these columns of numbers add up to different totals. Can you > move just one number to make the totals equal? > > 2 > 8 > 3 > 1 > 7 > 21 > > 6 > 4 > 5 > 9 > 24 > > Sorry Sean -- I don't think Google will help on this one. > > T. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus/Spam filtering
While gateway scanning is great, you would be much better off with something on the Exchange server itself. Here is one scenario as to why. User logs into Hotmail and downloads a virus and the desktop AV doesn't catch it. It grabs the list from the GAL and hammers the mail server. You are now fully infected. I would definitely look at something for the Exchange server as a primary, gateway is secondary. -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus/Spam filtering I have been given the task of finding and evaluating a SMTP Virus/Spam filter for our company. What products do you recommend? We are running one exchange server with about 700 mailboxes. We want to go gateway scanning so that the scanner is not residing on the exchange server. The two products we have been looking at in particular are Interscan Virus wall suite by Trend Micro and MailMarshall by Marshall software. Any suggestions/recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
It worked great. Thank you. Thank you. My final question. How come all the recurring meetings are gone? Any thing that I should do to get it back? Please advice. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy from the command line. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thank you so much for your help. I found the culprit and now I am able to access the Calendar. I do have one more question though. For some reason, eventhough there is no appointment set on most of the days in the future. i.e. next month and so forth. Almost all of those days are highlighted as if they have an appointment scheduled for those days. Any reason why? And any ideas on how do I go about and fix that? Thanks again Michael and everyone else who helped with this issue. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You mean GroupWise client? I will try that. Thanks! rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Download the GW Client from microsoft and move everything out of the calendar folder and start moving stuff back in until you figure out which request is the culprit. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar PST FILE Egads man, don't you have a SERVER? My question mark key is acting weird. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE
RE: Total K attribute for Header.csv
Isn't exportable via admin.exe. Can be exported using script. > -Original Message- > From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Total K attribute for Header.csv > > > > Trying to export a list of my mailbox's for my mangers that > have both the total k and home server attribute listed. I'm > do this now by doing 2 different export's one that list the > home server via the dir export and the other via the save > window contents then merging them via access. Tried searching > microsoft site for the attribute list of the field Total K > but can't find it. Tried the words Total K in the header.csv > but said it was illegal. Does anyone know what the proper > name for this attribute is _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free/busy info last month
Why can I not see free/busy info in last month. I am using exchange 2000 server with Outlook 2000 sr1 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Total K attribute for Header.csv
Sorry guys/gals/bob's/bobett's, if this is a multiple post ...I'm trying to get my access back to the forum Trying to export a list of my mailbox's for my mangers that have both the total k and home server attribute listed. I'm do this now by doing 2 different export's one that list the home server via the dir export and the other via the save window contents then merging them via access. Tried searching microsoft site for the attribute list of the field Total K but can't find it. Tried the words Total K in the header.csv but said it was illegal. Does anyone know what the proper name for this attribute is thanks john _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on Shark SAN solution
We run UNIX, Novell and NT with Exchange on the Shark SANS without any
issues. Yes you tell the SANS that this space is designated for the Exchange
box.
you see all the sans does is emulate hdds. You know the ide connection that
connects the hdds in your pc? Well a scsi or fibre channel is the
replacement for ide connection. All the sans does is put a virtual the hdd
on that connection but the server thinks it is a real hdd. If you tell the
sans a 10 gig on that cionnector then it is a 10 gigs. The servers do not
"share" the designated space.
It works very nicely. We had a motherboard go up on one of the novell
servers ("diskless" server) and literally just moved the fibre card to
another server class machine (which we fortuanely had just got in) and it
"thought" it was back up in working in the same machine. Its Great!!
Enjoy!!!
Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on Shark SAN solution
We are running our 2k server on a XIOTECH box. Runs great.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange on Shark SAN solution
My company has recently purchased a shark SAN that they are putting the
company's various UNIX and windows applications on. They are pushing to put
Exchange on it, however, I am somewhat skeptical due to some testing with
another SAN (Xiotech) that was unimpressive from a performance standpoint.
My questions are 2 fold:
For those of you running on SANs that are shared with other applications,
was there a specific way to dedicate a certain number of drives to Exchange
so that it doesn't have to share them with other applications to ensure best
performance? All opinions would be much appreciated since the SAN world is
new to me and it seems like there are many different ways to configure them.
The second part of my question is if anyone here is running Exchange 2000 on
a SHARK and what they're experience has been.
Thanks for all your help.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus/Spam filtering
I have been given the task of finding and evaluating a SMTP Virus/Spam filter for our company. What products do you recommend? We are running one exchange server with about 700 mailboxes. We want to go gateway scanning so that the scanner is not residing on the exchange server. The two products we have been looking at in particular are Interscan Virus wall suite by Trend Micro and MailMarshall by Marshall software. Any suggestions/recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks, Ryan N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE Network Administrator X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.xrite.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Total K attribute for Header.csv
Trying to export a list of my mailbox's for my mangers that have both the total k and home server attribute listed. I'm do this now by doing 2 different export's one that list the home server via the dir export and the other via the save window contents then merging them via access. Tried searching microsoft site for the attribute list of the field Total K but can't find it. Tried the words Total K in the header.csv but said it was illegal. Does anyone know what the proper name for this attribute is thanks john _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Mail migration
I'd like to, but around here dirt dishing shovels come with pink slips attached. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail migration Give us some GEAC dirt, John. You know you want to. > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:46 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: MS Mail migration > Subject: RE: MS Mail migration > > > > > Oh. Never mind. > > > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter > don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MS Mail migration > > > Unfortunately for the company it's nothing that hasn't > repeatedly been published in the IT press over here and > Private Eye (www.private-eye.co.uk) Ad Passim, Ad Nauseam, in > recent years. Give it a few more years and we'll be a smooth > streamlined business > > > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 May 2002 17:13 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter > don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anything else after "restore"
Julian, I am baffled by this, I cannot place my finger on the cause of their "freezing". It doesn't happen to everyone but when some people try to send small text massages it will take a long time to actually send. Others while the click through messages it hangs up. I have tried to limit attachment size, I did find one person trying to receive a 22 MB file. That was one environmental problem. But problems continued. The system is fully patched (re:hfnetchk, and every patch I can find that applies). But it still locks for some users. It is fine now, after a reboot, but I can't keep doing this every couple of days Any ideas are appreciated. Paul M. Done Information Technology Consultant California State University, San Bernardino Office of the President & Academic Affairs 5500 University Parkway AD109 San Bernardino, California 92407 P: 909.880.7652 M: 909.553.6698 W: http://admin2.csusb.edu/pdone PGP Key : http://admin2.csusb.edu/pdone/pgp "Sometimes is one word and other times two" -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anything else after "restore" Were these 'different' users to those yesterday? If so then it may be their profiles just up-dating themselves, but I would check name resolution\network between client & server & add a 'Host' entry if needed. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Paul Done [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 19:15 pm To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anything else after "restore" Okay if I have gotten it done correctly, this morning I come in and get calls about a "locking" Outlook. The description is the same that three or four people claim their screen locks for a minute and then it lets them in. One person it doesn't even let them in. Does this sound familiar to anyone who can tell me what and where to look for a solution? Trying to log into their mailbox on another computer yields the same results. Environment: The exchange is in a 733Mhz, 256 RAM with (2) 17 GB SCSI, the stores and logs are separate disks, and Exchange is the only thing running on the box. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy from the command line. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thank you so much for your help. I found the culprit and now I am able to access the Calendar. I do have one more question though. For some reason, eventhough there is no appointment set on most of the days in the future. i.e. next month and so forth. Almost all of those days are highlighted as if they have an appointment scheduled for those days. Any reason why? And any ideas on how do I go about and fix that? Thanks again Michael and everyone else who helped with this issue. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You mean GroupWise client? I will try that. Thanks! rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Download the GW Client from microsoft and move everything out of the calendar folder and start moving stuff back in until you figure out which request is the culprit. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar PST FILE Egads man, don't you have a SERVER? My question mark key is acting weird. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I did setup a profile for this conference room and I was able to open up the pst file and I can view everything but as soon as I click on Calendar, that's it. It freezes up. What should I do? How do I switch by category or by recurrence? Any ideas? Thanks again for all the help. rama -Original Message- From:
Re: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
Wait a minute that makes it 42 vs 45 when the six is turned upside down. Both columns before any moves are 42 vs 48? - Original Message - From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:10 PM Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > RAA! Yeah, I'm stupid. Thanks:-) > > -Original Message- > From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:02 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > > turn the 9 upside down > > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > > Help would be greatly appreciated. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jerig, Tony > > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:48 PM > > To: Burke, Sean; Gilligan, Todd; Coomer, Chris; Weber, Rick; Woodruff, > > Michael; Shumway, Neal; Rhodes, Kevin; Brown, Ted; Biller, Bradley; > > Wright, Aaron; Abner, Mary; Hingsbergen, Kathleen > > Subject: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > > > I will be out of the office Monday for vacation and Tuesday visiting > > HPM. Thought I would send out a couple of quizzes to offer up the > > office while I am out. > > > > Here is the first quiz. First person to email me the correct answer > > gets the office for Monday. I will send a second quiz for Tuesday's > > lodging. > > > > Quiz #1: > > > > Both of these columns of numbers add up to different totals. Can you > > move just one number to make the totals equal? > > > > 2 > > 8 > > 3 > > 1 > > 7 > > 21 > > > > 6 > > 4 > > 5 > > 9 > > 24 > > > > Sorry Sean -- I don't think Google will help on this one. > > > > T. > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restrict an exchange 2000 user from internet email
I'd follow the method described in the FAQ. > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Restrict an exchange 2000 user from internet email > > > How would you restrict a user from receiving internet mail on > an Exchange 2000 server? In Exchange 5.5 I just deleted the > SMTP address to stop the receiving ability, but as you know > this isn't possible in 2000. Thank you in advance for any help. Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
RAA! Yeah, I'm stupid. Thanks:-) -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday turn the 9 upside down -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday Help would be greatly appreciated. > -Original Message- > From: Jerig, Tony > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:48 PM > To: Burke, Sean; Gilligan, Todd; Coomer, Chris; Weber, Rick; Woodruff, > Michael; Shumway, Neal; Rhodes, Kevin; Brown, Ted; Biller, Bradley; > Wright, Aaron; Abner, Mary; Hingsbergen, Kathleen > Subject: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > I will be out of the office Monday for vacation and Tuesday visiting > HPM. Thought I would send out a couple of quizzes to offer up the > office while I am out. > > Here is the first quiz. First person to email me the correct answer > gets the office for Monday. I will send a second quiz for Tuesday's > lodging. > > Quiz #1: > > Both of these columns of numbers add up to different totals. Can you > move just one number to make the totals equal? > > 2 > 8 > 3 > 1 > 7 > 21 > > 6 > 4 > 5 > 9 > 24 > > Sorry Sean -- I don't think Google will help on this one. > > T. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
Thank you so much for your help. I found the culprit and now I am able to access the Calendar. I do have one more question though. For some reason, eventhough there is no appointment set on most of the days in the future. i.e. next month and so forth. Almost all of those days are highlighted as if they have an appointment scheduled for those days. Any reason why? And any ideas on how do I go about and fix that? Thanks again Michael and everyone else who helped with this issue. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You mean GroupWise client? I will try that. Thanks! rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Download the GW Client from microsoft and move everything out of the calendar folder and start moving stuff back in until you figure out which request is the culprit. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar PST FILE Egads man, don't you have a SERVER? My question mark key is acting weird. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I did setup a profile for this conference room and I was able to open up the pst file and I can view everything but as soon as I click on Calendar, that's it. It freezes up. What should I do? How do I switch by category or by recurrence? Any ideas? Thanks again for all the help. rama -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You probably have a corrupt calendar entry in there. Set up a profile for this conference
Re: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
That is certainly called a move. You win the office I think. - Original Message - From: "John Allhiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:02 PM Subject: RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > turn the 9 upside down > > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > > Help would be greatly appreciated. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jerig, Tony > > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:48 PM > > To: Burke, Sean; Gilligan, Todd; Coomer, Chris; Weber, Rick; Woodruff, > > Michael; Shumway, Neal; Rhodes, Kevin; Brown, Ted; Biller, Bradley; > > Wright, Aaron; Abner, Mary; Hingsbergen, Kathleen > > Subject: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > > > I will be out of the office Monday for vacation and Tuesday visiting HPM. > > Thought I would send out a couple of quizzes to offer up the office while > > I am out. > > > > Here is the first quiz. First person to email me the correct answer gets > > the office for Monday. I will send a second quiz for Tuesday's lodging. > > > > Quiz #1: > > > > Both of these columns of numbers add up to different totals. Can you move > > just one number to make the totals equal? > > > > 2 > > 8 > > 3 > > 1 > > 7 > > 21 > > > > 6 > > 4 > > 5 > > 9 > > 24 > > > > Sorry Sean -- I don't think Google will help on this one. > > > > T. > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
turn the 9 upside down -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday Help would be greatly appreciated. > -Original Message- > From: Jerig, Tony > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:48 PM > To: Burke, Sean; Gilligan, Todd; Coomer, Chris; Weber, Rick; Woodruff, > Michael; Shumway, Neal; Rhodes, Kevin; Brown, Ted; Biller, Bradley; > Wright, Aaron; Abner, Mary; Hingsbergen, Kathleen > Subject: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > I will be out of the office Monday for vacation and Tuesday visiting HPM. > Thought I would send out a couple of quizzes to offer up the office while > I am out. > > Here is the first quiz. First person to email me the correct answer gets > the office for Monday. I will send a second quiz for Tuesday's lodging. > > Quiz #1: > > Both of these columns of numbers add up to different totals. Can you move > just one number to make the totals equal? > > 2 > 8 > 3 > 1 > 7 > 21 > > 6 > 4 > 5 > 9 > 24 > > Sorry Sean -- I don't think Google will help on this one. > > T. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
Yes, this product is causing my cluster not to failover. Trendmicro has been working this call for about 15 days and they haven't yet escaluted this to microsoft for a PSS. I am very disappointed in their support. HP/Compaq is willing to work with MS on this issue. But I hope MS doesn't say turn it off. I guess this is what is happening to my cluster during a failover. IS and SMTP resources fail an isalive check - from an unknown source [EXRESOCK], at this point we are assuming that Trendmicro Scanmail will not let the resources go. TrendMicro couldn't confirm how many clients are using Scanmail for exchange in an cluster environment. Compaq/HP has seen this with antigen and they have a fix for that but nothing for trendmicro yet. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? Yes, I'm using it on a cluster. No, I don't like it. Yes, it causes problems. Problems that do not occur when it's used non-clustered. I just posted a week ago that if the services (trend's) take a nanosecond too long to restart when you force a dat update that the cluster *does* failover, which it should not. I've had all kinds of things hangup on a failover and it doesn't fail over completely and there you are with no mail and two servers that have become truculent. [1] Clustering 5.5 is just not worth the amount of jerry-rigging and praying to $deity that is required for it to function. [1] blatantly stolen from kim :) -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? If so, are you experiencing any problems with this software not allowing the cluster to failover. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Restrict an exchange 2000 user from internet email
Use an "internal" domain that is not internet routable(for example PREMUSAinternal.com) and use e-mail addresses for this domain to achieve your goal > > From: "Jeremy I. Shannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2002/05/17 Fri PM 01:51:46 EDT > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Restrict an exchange 2000 user from internet email > > How would you restrict a user from receiving internet mail on an Exchange 2000 >server? In Exchange 5.5 I just deleted the SMTP address to stop the receiving >ability, but as you know this isn't possible in 2000. Thank you in advance for any >help. > Jer > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
Yes, I'm using it on a cluster. No, I don't like it. Yes, it causes problems. Problems that do not occur when it's used non-clustered. I just posted a week ago that if the services (trend's) take a nanosecond too long to restart when you force a dat update that the cluster *does* failover, which it should not. I've had all kinds of things hangup on a failover and it doesn't fail over completely and there you are with no mail and two servers that have become truculent. [1] Clustering 5.5 is just not worth the amount of jerry-rigging and praying to $deity that is required for it to function. [1] blatantly stolen from kim :) -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? If so, are you experiencing any problems with this software not allowing the cluster to failover. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
Help would be greatly appreciated. > -Original Message- > From: Jerig, Tony > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:48 PM > To: Burke, Sean; Gilligan, Todd; Coomer, Chris; Weber, Rick; Woodruff, > Michael; Shumway, Neal; Rhodes, Kevin; Brown, Ted; Biller, Bradley; > Wright, Aaron; Abner, Mary; Hingsbergen, Kathleen > Subject: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday > > I will be out of the office Monday for vacation and Tuesday visiting HPM. > Thought I would send out a couple of quizzes to offer up the office while > I am out. > > Here is the first quiz. First person to email me the correct answer gets > the office for Monday. I will send a second quiz for Tuesday's lodging. > > Quiz #1: > > Both of these columns of numbers add up to different totals. Can you move > just one number to make the totals equal? > > 2 > 8 > 3 > 1 > 7 > 21 > > 6 > 4 > 5 > 9 > 24 > > Sorry Sean -- I don't think Google will help on this one. > > T. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Restrict an exchange 2000 user from internet email
How would you restrict a user from receiving internet mail on an Exchange 2000 server? In Exchange 5.5 I just deleted the SMTP address to stop the receiving ability, but as you know this isn't possible in 2000. Thank you in advance for any help. Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
Thank you Sir. I will do that. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You mean GroupWise client? I will try that. Thanks! rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Download the GW Client from microsoft and move everything out of the calendar folder and start moving stuff back in until you figure out which request is the culprit. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar PST FILE Egads man, don't you have a SERVER? My question mark key is acting weird. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I did setup a profile for this conference room and I was able to open up the pst file and I can view everything but as soon as I click on Calendar, that's it. It freezes up. What should I do? How do I switch by category or by recurrence? Any ideas? Thanks again for all the help. rama -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You probably have a corrupt calendar entry in there. Set up a profile for this conference room, open the PST, switch to By Category or By Recurrence view and copy only the NON-RECURRING meetings back into the original calendar. Then you can start looking for the culprit recurring meeting [1]. Look for meetings with lots of exceptions or blank subject lines or that have a conflict icon next to it. Serdar Soysal [1] It is a recurring meeting 99% of the time. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent
RE: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's
Make sure replication has taken place and send an email to the mailbox. It should show up after that. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's I can create a user anywhere but theres no exchange tasks available. Also now ive noticed when I create a user no mailbox is created even though it says it is. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's Are you saying you don't have the ability to create a new user? Is advanced features viewing turned on? The next time you post use a fresh thread. - Original Message - From: "Ronald Mazzotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's My workstations are the only place I can create mb's through ad from. My servers do not have any info in their ad u&c's to create ANY exchange info. Yet my exchange operates fine. Any ideas. Or is this normal. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
Create a profile with the conf room. Logon to that profile with the client. Drill down to calendar (under "Top of information store")highlight the appointments and right click. Move somewhere else. Then move each one in till you find the corrupt one. You will know, because it will lock up on you probably. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You mean GroupWise client? I will try that. Thanks! rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Download the GW Client from microsoft and move everything out of the calendar folder and start moving stuff back in until you figure out which request is the culprit. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar PST FILE Egads man, don't you have a SERVER? My question mark key is acting weird. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I did setup a profile for this conference room and I was able to open up the pst file and I can view everything but as soon as I click on Calendar, that's it. It freezes up. What should I do? How do I switch by category or by recurrence? Any ideas? Thanks again for all the help. rama -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You probably have a corrupt calendar entry in there. Set up a profile for this conference room, open the PST, switch to By Category or By Recurrence view and copy only the NON-RECURRING meetings back into the original calendar. Then you can start looking for the culprit recurring meeting [1]. Look for meetings with lots of exceptions or blank subject lines or that have a conflict icon next to it. Serdar Soysal [1] It is a recurring meeting 99% of the time. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conference Board Calendar Hello everyone, We are currently running exchange 5.5 SP4. Recently all of our users
RE: Conference Board Calendar
Thanks a lot for letting me know on where to find the GWClient. Now I got it installed, how do I go about moving the calendar items and moving back in? Please help. I am kind of lost at this point. rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Sorry guys. Its located in the 4.5 Backoffice Resource Kit. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Well, apparently we are using OWA to download the old Exchange client from the Gateway Mail Client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Using OWA? You mean Outlook Web Access? How? I am completely lost guys. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have also been able to find it using OWA. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I have never heard of it. Are we talking about the old MS Exchange Client? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Am I missing something here? I can't seem to find the Gateway Mail client at all at the Microsoft site. I will keep looking. If any of you find a different site, please let me know. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar No, I mean Gateway Mail client. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You mean GroupWise client? I will try that. Thanks! rama -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar Download the GW Client from microsoft and move everything out of the calendar folder and start moving stuff back in until you figure out which request is the culprit. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar PST FILE Egads man, don't you have a SERVER? My question mark key is acting weird. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I did setup a profile for this conference room and I was able to open up the pst file and I can view everything but as soon as I click on Calendar, that's it. It freezes up. What should I do? How do I switch by category or by recurrence? Any ideas? Thanks again for all the help. rama -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You probably have a corrupt calendar entry in there. Set up a profile for this conference room, open the PST, switch to By Category or By Recurrence view and copy only the NON-RECURRING meetings back into the original calendar. Then you can start looking for the culprit recurring meeting [1]. Look for meetings with lots of exceptions or blank subject lines or that have a conflict icon next to it. Serdar Soysal [1] It is a recurring meeting 99% of the time. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conference Board Calendar Hello everyone, We are currently running exchange 5.5 SP4. Recently all of our users including the exchange admin account are unable to open the conference room's calendar to view who has booked the room. Everyone can request the conference room and only the receptionist is able to view the conference room's calendar to accept and reject the requests. Even she can only do it for one day that is just for today. If she tries to look it up for tomorrow or next week, then it just hangs, and I see that it tries to Synchronize for hours. This issue just started recently
RE: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's
I can create a user anywhere but theres no exchange tasks available. Also now ive noticed when I create a user no mailbox is created even though it says it is. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's Are you saying you don't have the ability to create a new user? Is advanced features viewing turned on? The next time you post use a fresh thread. - Original Message - From: "Ronald Mazzotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's My workstations are the only place I can create mb's through ad from. My servers do not have any info in their ad u&c's to create ANY exchange info. Yet my exchange operates fine. Any ideas. Or is this normal. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's
Are you saying you don't have the ability to create a new user? Is advanced features viewing turned on? The next time you post use a fresh thread. - Original Message - From: "Ronald Mazzotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's My workstations are the only place I can create mb's through ad from. My servers do not have any info in their ad u&c's to create ANY exchange info. Yet my exchange operates fine. Any ideas. Or is this normal. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Oh, I dunno - useful ammunition if anyone wants to comment on whether or not EDS should be used for an outsourcing gig. It's going into _my_ "save file". G. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different "accounts" as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has to look > after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central source unless the > contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the > subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really updated the > MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this direct. I am > > looking for a document on migrating from MS Mail to Exchange 5.5 and > > would be grateful if someone has a document or guide of some > > description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchang
RE: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's
You might want to load the exchange system tools on your server. -Original Message- From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's My workstations are the only place I can create mb's through ad from. My servers do not have any info in their ad u&c's to create ANY exchange info. Yet my exchange operates fine. Any ideas. Or is this normal. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Oh, I dunno - useful ammunition if anyone wants to comment on whether or not EDS should be used for an outsourcing gig. It's going into _my_ "save file". G. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different "accounts" as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has to look > after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central source unless the > contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the > subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really updated the > MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this direct. I am > > looking for a document on migrating from MS Mail to Exchange 5.5 and > > would be grateful if someone has a document or guide of some > > description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
If so, are you experiencing any problems with this software not allowing the cluster to failover. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 and ad users and pc's
My workstations are the only place I can create mb's through ad from. My servers do not have any info in their ad u&c's to create ANY exchange info. Yet my exchange operates fine. Any ideas. Or is this normal. Director of IT, Ronald Mazzotta -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Oh, I dunno - useful ammunition if anyone wants to comment on whether or not EDS should be used for an outsourcing gig. It's going into _my_ "save file". G. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different "accounts" as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has to look > after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central source unless the > contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the > subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really updated the > MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this direct. I am > > looking for a document on migrating from MS Mail to Exchange 5.5 and > > would be grateful if someone has a document or guide of some > > description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: MS Mail mjgration
Oh, I dunno - useful ammunition if anyone wants to comment on whether or not EDS should be used for an outsourcing gig. It's going into _my_ "save file". G. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different "accounts" as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has to look > after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central source unless the > contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the > subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really updated the > MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this direct. I am > > looking for a document on migrating from MS Mail to Exchange 5.5 and > > would be grateful if someone has a document or guide of some > > description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Mail migration
Give us some GEAC dirt, John. You know you want to. > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:46 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: MS Mail migration > Subject: RE: MS Mail migration > > > > > Oh. Never mind. > > > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter > don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MS Mail migration > > > Unfortunately for the company it's nothing that hasn't > repeatedly been published in the IT press over here and > Private Eye (www.private-eye.co.uk) Ad Passim, Ad Nauseam, in > recent years. Give it a few more years and we'll be a smooth > streamlined business > > > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 17 May 2002 17:13 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter > don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Mail migration
Oh. Never mind. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail migration Unfortunately for the company it's nothing that hasn't repeatedly been published in the IT press over here and Private Eye (www.private-eye.co.uk) Ad Passim, Ad Nauseam, in recent years. Give it a few more years and we'll be a smooth streamlined business -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different "accounts" as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has > to look after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central > source unless the contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on > the subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really > updated the MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this > > direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS > > Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a > > document or guide of some description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
RE: MS Mail mjgration
Why notIt fun -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different "accounts" as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has to look > after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central source unless the > contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the > subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really updated the > MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this direct. I am > > looking for a document on migrating from MS Mail to Exchange 5.5 and > > would be grateful if someone has a document or guide of some > > description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS Mail migration
Unfortunately for the company it's nothing that hasn't repeatedly been published in the IT press over here and Private Eye (www.private-eye.co.uk) Ad Passim, Ad Nauseam, in recent years. Give it a few more years and we'll be a smooth streamlined business -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different "accounts" as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has > to look after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central > source unless the contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on > the subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really > updated the MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this > > direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS > > Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a > > document or guide of some description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Mail mjgration
Do you EDS'ers need to be airing the "dirty wash" here in public? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS Mail mjgration The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different "accounts" as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has > to look after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central > source unless the contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on > the subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really > updated the MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this > > direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS > > Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a > > document or guide of some description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating a user/mailbox with asp
Looks simple but it ain't workin for me. I am using code I got from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/_cdo_creating_a_mailbox_enabled_recipient.asp
I have the asp running as a domain admin. It fails while trying to create
the user with "objPerson.DataSource.SaveTo". The error code is: 0x80040E21
I've omitted the mailbox create part since it won't even pass the user
creation.
thank you in advance
Below is the code:
Dim objPerson
Set objPerson = CreateObject("CDO.Person")
Dim objMailbox
objPerson.FirstName = "Fred"
objPerson.LastName = "Flintstone"
objPerson.Fields("userPrincipalName") = "Flintstone"
objPerson.Fields("userAccountControl") = 512
objPerson.Fields("userPassword") = "password"
objPerson.Fields.Update
objPerson.DataSource.SaveTo "LDAP://servername/CN=Fred
Flintstone,cn=users,dc=domain,dc=com"
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS Mail mjgration
The question came from a person who is employed in the Messaging and Collaborative Services group within the UK central support facility, called the DSMC (Distributed Services Management Cowboys). His job is to support lots of different "accounts" as witnessed by the fact that he sent the mail from a BP.com and a reply from a flsystems.co.uk account. Over on this side of the pond the 1st and 2nd line support is in place but can be very intransigent and isn't that great. 3rd line support in EDS UK is nigh non existent and no one will fart without a cost centre to book time as. They have taken the leveraged support model to such an extent that nothing works, no one knows who to talk to, where and when. I too am horrified but not in the least bit surprised that an EDSer has had to go to the web to ask this kind of question. None of them in DSMC seem to use TechNet of the online KB for anything. I like working for EDS but Christ, they sure make it difficult for you. What makes me laugh is that I know the guy and know that he knows there are two Exchange MVPs working in EDS and who they are, but still he emails the newsgroup to ask a pretty basic question. All this from a group that touts themselves as the last word in messaging for EDS customers. M -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has > to look after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central > source unless the contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on > the subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really > updated the MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this > > direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS > > Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a > > document or guide of some description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PSS?
I'm glad this newsgroup goes into its own Public Folder Store. I foresee exponential growth for a little while. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 16:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PSS? Here it comes! -Original Message- From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSS? I have seen alot of references to this in this list? What is PSS? Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
>From your earlier message, it looks like just the attachment was blocked, in which >case you could open the message in Ho Ping Pings's mailbox and go to View -> Options >to see the internet headers. If the message itself was blocked it's trickier, but if >you have message archiving turned on you might be able to find the message in the >archives (\exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive). In this case you'll have to use the received >time to find it. In either case you'll see some Received: From and By lines, and you just need to find the ip address in the first From section, which would be the one that's actually lowest in the headers. -Peter -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 18:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Would you kindly gave me some direction on how to check the ip? This msg had been block, which mean that nobody will receive the msg. Thanks -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Getting back to the problem, I think you should use Outlook to look at the Internet headers of one of the messages that had its attachment stripped. You should be able to see in there the ip address of the sending PC. -Peter -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 17:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Hi all.. I'm using Exchange 5.5. It's multiple users. Email auto generate by multiple user. For e.g. My address book have [EMAIL PROTECTED],and etc. Even thought this user (abc) did not switch on the pc, there was still have mail from his mailbox send to other people. But i have scanned this user pc, no virus detected. Below is e.g. of the mssg is normal alert generate by Exchange to all the administrator. I cant found any clues from the msg, i have ask the Victor :- user whether did he send mail..but he said no. Sender of the infected attachment: Victor_Hoon Recipient of the infected attachment: Ho Ping Ping\Inbox Subject of the message: Powered by One or more attachments were deleted. Attachment color.exe was Deleted for the following reasons: Virus UNAUTHORIZED FILE was found. This msg is generated because we had blocked the *.exe HELP -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? It might be the klez virus, which likes to spoof messages from postmaster. Usually these spoofed messages come from outside and don't indicate an infection inside the domain. Look at the headers of the messages to get an idea of where they are really coming from -Peter -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? One user or multiple users? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be notified that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Exchange on Shark SAN solution
In two weeks we will be migrating our Exchange storage to a Compaq SAN. With Compaq you can specify a preferred path to disks so that a specific server or cluster has access to those disks--no other system has access unless you configure the SAN to allow it. The default for Windows systems is to allow access to all disks. You have to disallow this before bringing the system online. In our testing the Compaq SAN worked fine. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on Shark SAN solution We are running our 2k server on a XIOTECH box. Runs great. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on Shark SAN solution My company has recently purchased a shark SAN that they are putting the company's various UNIX and windows applications on. They are pushing to put Exchange on it, however, I am somewhat skeptical due to some testing with another SAN (Xiotech) that was unimpressive from a performance standpoint. My questions are 2 fold: For those of you running on SANs that are shared with other applications, was there a specific way to dedicate a certain number of drives to Exchange so that it doesn't have to share them with other applications to ensure best performance? All opinions would be much appreciated since the SAN world is new to me and it seems like there are many different ways to configure them. The second part of my question is if anyone here is running Exchange 2000 on a SHARK and what they're experience has been. Thanks for all your help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PSS?
I knew a girl that had it pretty bad. - Original Message - From: "Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:26 AM Subject: PSS? > I have seen alot of references to this in this list? > What is PSS? > > Phil > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSS?
FAQ 2.3 -Original Message- From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSS? I have seen alot of references to this in this list? What is PSS? Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSS?
What do you mean? My answer was polite and provided the requested information... > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PSS? > > > Here it comes! > > -Original Message- > From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: PSS? > > > I have seen alot of references to this in this list? > What is PSS? > > Phil > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSS?
Here it comes! -Original Message- From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSS? I have seen alot of references to this in this list? What is PSS? Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSS?
Product Support Services, the fine folks who provide the phone support for the various MS products. Some present and former MS employees who worked as PSS engineers are on this list. Links found at http://support.microsoft.com/ will provide info on how to contact PSS if you have problems, and what the costs are. > -Original Message- > From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: PSS? > > > I have seen alot of references to this in this list? > What is PSS? > > Phil > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSS?
I have seen alot of references to this in this list? What is PSS? Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on Shark SAN solution
We are running our 2k server on a XIOTECH box. Runs great. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on Shark SAN solution My company has recently purchased a shark SAN that they are putting the company's various UNIX and windows applications on. They are pushing to put Exchange on it, however, I am somewhat skeptical due to some testing with another SAN (Xiotech) that was unimpressive from a performance standpoint. My questions are 2 fold: For those of you running on SANs that are shared with other applications, was there a specific way to dedicate a certain number of drives to Exchange so that it doesn't have to share them with other applications to ensure best performance? All opinions would be much appreciated since the SAN world is new to me and it seems like there are many different ways to configure them. The second part of my question is if anyone here is running Exchange 2000 on a SHARK and what they're experience has been. Thanks for all your help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Journal Help
I noticed that I could do that. It's one of those, "It's so simple I could not see it" solutions. Thanks! - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:41 AM Subject: RE: Journal Help > Add the people you want to journal for from the GAL to your contact list. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:54 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Journal Help > > > > > > I am using Exchange 5.5 with SP4 > > > > I have enabled Journaling and I want to specify which > > contacts to enable the Journal for. > > > > Under Tools, Options I selected Journal Options. > > In the next screen I can select which contacts to enable the > > Journal for, however these contacts are not part of the > > Global Address list they are my personal contacts. I have > > tried everywhere I know to change the listed contacts to the > > Global Addres list to no avail. Can anyone help with this? > > > > PS Yes my default contact set is the global address list. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Journal Help
Add the people you want to journal for from the GAL to your contact list. > -Original Message- > From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Journal Help > > > I am using Exchange 5.5 with SP4 > > I have enabled Journaling and I want to specify which > contacts to enable the Journal for. > > Under Tools, Options I selected Journal Options. > In the next screen I can select which contacts to enable the > Journal for, however these contacts are not part of the > Global Address list they are my personal contacts. I have > tried everywhere I know to change the listed contacts to the > Global Addres list to no avail. Can anyone help with this? > > PS Yes my default contact set is the global address list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Adding disclaimed footer to all mail messages
we use the IMSEXT.DLL for 5.5, but I just looked at a product called DISCLAIMIT for 2000 and it is great, especially for those of us who have to host multiple companies. Each company can have their own disclaimer. It's not too expensive and it works. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST files larger than 2GB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > Does anyone have the address where we can mail Microsoft the > clues necessary for them to remove that P.O.S.[1] "personal > folders" service from Outlook and finally relegate PST files > to the same junk pile as 8 inch floppy disks. > > > [1] P.O.S. as defined by Will Smith in Men in Black when > referring to the car. > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence > without communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:48 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: PST files larger than 2GB > > > They said that just before people starting to throw stuff at > them. After the presenters suffered from that ... we don't > know if this limit will be implemented by MS ;) > > -- > Martin Tuip > MVP Exchange > Exchange2000 List owner > www.exchange-mail.org > www.sharepointserver.com > -- > - Original Message - > From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:13 PM > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > > I believe the 32TB number was announced in the last MEC. > > > > Serdar Soysal > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:08 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > > > > 32 TB??? > > > > The unlimited version of Exchange will only support 16 TB. > > > > Details! Sources! > > > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > > (404) 239 - 2981 > > > > Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without > > communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:00 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > > > > 32TB and likely none of the currently shipping versions. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:39 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: PST files larger than 2GB > > > > > > > > > Maybe I am going mad but I am sure somewhere on this list someone > > > mentioned Microsoft were developing pst that had > unlimited capacity > > > (or certainly more than the current 2GB) is this true? > What version > > > of Outlook will support these larger personal folders? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Paul > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Mail mjgration
I don't need to point out how silly that is right? > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > Chris, > > Not really what happens is that each contract basically has > to look after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central > source unless the contract is being held to ransom. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everybody agrees you should have one, > but no one wants to use yours > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration > > > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp > > I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on > the subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really > updated the MS Mail docs for E2K. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this > > direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS > > Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a > > document or guide of some description they can pass on. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange on Shark SAN solution
My company has recently purchased a shark SAN that they are putting the company's various UNIX and windows applications on. They are pushing to put Exchange on it, however, I am somewhat skeptical due to some testing with another SAN (Xiotech) that was unimpressive from a performance standpoint. My questions are 2 fold: For those of you running on SANs that are shared with other applications, was there a specific way to dedicate a certain number of drives to Exchange so that it doesn't have to share them with other applications to ensure best performance? All opinions would be much appreciated since the SAN world is new to me and it seems like there are many different ways to configure them. The second part of my question is if anyone here is running Exchange 2000 on a SHARK and what they're experience has been. Thanks for all your help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How about this as an option?
Reading this email reminds me of a conversation between Ford Prefect and Arthur Dent: FP: "...it's unpleasantly like being drunk." AD: "What's so unpleasant about being drunk?" FP: "You ask a glass of water." > -Original Message- > From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 05:02 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: How about this as an option? > Subject: RE: How about this as an option? > > > > Well, whether it can or can't is really kind of a moot > point because > > it need to pass the message to the specified bridgead(s) in > its site > > to be passed on. > > >> That clears that up, thanks. > > > No, I think[1] that they have knowledge of servers outside of their > > site, but they also know what paths they are allowed to use > to deliver > > mail, and with the bridgehead down, there are no remaining paths. > > >>Makes sense! > > > > > Donald Livengood an HP consultant gave a 2 hour presentation on > > > > the subject in fast talkin redneck at a Compaq Exchange > Academy I > > > > attended. I think he might have given a similar presentation at > > > > MEC last year or the year before.. Might check Microsoft's > > > website for the > > > > slide deck. > > > > > > >>I will try to see if I can find his narrative as well to add to the > >>ppt > file > >>Gary kindly sent. > > > > > How big are the pipes and servers. I've seen a lot of E2K designs > > where it was clear the architects were stuck in 5.5 ways of > thinking. > > I'm not saying that is the case for you, but there's always that > > possibility. > > > > >> The pipes are a decent size (128kb +). I think I can see where you > >> are > going >> (i.e. intersite connectivity is via smtp so less > bandwidth hungry and more > >> resillient, right? > >> One of the reasons I think the routing groups were put in was to > control > >> public folder access (local client access local copy of folder). > > > In answer to the bigger question I think.. You can add more > > bridgeheads with higher routing costs to provide redundancy > in message > > routing while still maintaining primary message traffic routes for > > normal circumstances. > > > > >>It appears clear that the mailbox servers should have rg connectors > >>set > with >>higher costs. > > > [1] Think, don't have time to verify at the moment, but > either way I > > don't think it matters to the answer. > > >>I agree. > > >>To everyone who has submitted in this thread. THANKS > >>This sort of information is either very well hidden in some text > somewhere or >>is just not available. Even with a test lab > this is difficult to emulate and >>I am always in > appreciation of the experience/knowledge sharing that goes on >>here. > > >>I will keep you all posted on my progress. > Regards > Leo > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Redundancy
We had to contact a sales rep (www.nsisoftware.com) for pricing. It may be "negotiable" (?), so I don't want to give you any misleading information. Tom Bloom Texas A&M University -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Sounds really good. How much does Geocluster cost? (hehe I am lazy to go look at their website :) -Original Message- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy All Exchange services (except SRS and Event) are cluster resources that fail over when the disk (or server) fails. Additionally, there is an Exchange virtual server resource (what your clients connect to) that fails over. Geocluster creates a Replicated Disk Resource that replicates the data in real time. We did a test failover during the workday and no one reported any problems. It took about 60-90 seconds for the failover to complete. Outlook didn't even burp. It's very important to have a fast and reliable network connection on the private cluster interface since the replication traffic uses this (our is switched 100BaseT). Tom Bloom Systems Analyst Department of Student Life Texas A&M University (979) 862-7990 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy What happens if server A's storage blows? Do the users on server A still get blown out of the water? Or does Geocluster mirror storage between server A and server B? -Original Message- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy We are using an Exchange 2000 active/passive cluster with NSI's Geocluster product. Geocluster extends MS Cluster Services by allowing each server in the cluster to have their own disk storage (no shared disk as in traditional clustering). Geocluster has worked well with Exchange 2000 and we've had few problems. Tom Bloom Texas A&M University -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Did Double-take mirror the entire Information Store in real time? I know Octopus would choke if someone tried to mirror a very large file. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy I have used Doubletake and Co-standby in the Exchange 5.5 and co-standby is the Winner in my book. If I ever get the ex2k up and mailboxes moved over (almost done) I will use co-standby for that as well. -Original Message- From: David Weinstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Clustering will do that but you will not get load balancing - Microsoft's implementation of clustering is hot standby -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy It's still called clustering. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Redundancy Having just had our sole Exchange server go down, is there a way of having a redundant server (or load balancing) that is an exact replicar (in terms of user mailboxes etc..)? Basically i am after failover redundacy, so that if one server goes down it will not effect users abilities to send and recive mail. - Is this practical? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesea
Journal Help
I am using Exchange 5.5 with SP4 I have enabled Journaling and I want to specify which contacts to enable the Journal for. Under Tools, Options I selected Journal Options. In the next screen I can select which contacts to enable the Journal for, however these contacts are not part of the Global Address list they are my personal contacts. I have tried everywhere I know to change the listed contacts to the Global Addres list to no avail. Can anyone help with this? PS Yes my default contact set is the global address list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST files larger than 2GB
I understand that I can remove it locally, and I'm working with our desktop folks to make the "personal folder" service not available in the next image update to our workstations. My complaint is that PST files are old, they are security risks, they are bits that needs to be relegated to the museum of ancient history, much like a "Trash-80" model 1 or a MicroVAX. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB A bunch of ways: Q114491 -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB Does anyone have the address where we can mail Microsoft the clues necessary for them to remove that P.O.S.[1] "personal folders" service from Outlook and finally relegate PST files to the same junk pile as 8 inch floppy disks. [1] P.O.S. as defined by Will Smith in Men in Black when referring to the car. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: PST files larger than 2GB They said that just before people starting to throw stuff at them. After the presenters suffered from that ... we don't know if this limit will be implemented by MS ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:13 PM Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > I believe the 32TB number was announced in the last MEC. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > 32 TB??? > > The unlimited version of Exchange will only support 16 TB. > > Details! Sources! > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without > communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > 32TB and likely none of the currently shipping versions. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:39 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: PST files larger than 2GB > > > > > > Maybe I am going mad but I am sure somewhere on this list someone > > mentioned Microsoft were developing pst that had unlimited capacity > > (or certainly more than the current 2GB) is this true? What version > > of Outlook will support these larger personal folders? > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mai
RE: PST files larger than 2GB
I use .pst's lots. For Dashbord Development. Email archiving. Don't poopoo the .pst 'cept when for primary email storage for users. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB Does anyone have the address where we can mail Microsoft the clues necessary for them to remove that P.O.S.[1] "personal folders" service from Outlook and finally relegate PST files to the same junk pile as 8 inch floppy disks. [1] P.O.S. as defined by Will Smith in Men in Black when referring to the car. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: PST files larger than 2GB They said that just before people starting to throw stuff at them. After the presenters suffered from that ... we don't know if this limit will be implemented by MS ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:13 PM Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > I believe the 32TB number was announced in the last MEC. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > 32 TB??? > > The unlimited version of Exchange will only support 16 TB. > > Details! Sources! > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without > communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > 32TB and likely none of the currently shipping versions. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:39 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: PST files larger than 2GB > > > > > > Maybe I am going mad but I am sure somewhere on this list someone > > mentioned Microsoft were developing pst that had unlimited capacity > > (or certainly more than the current 2GB) is this true? What version > > of Outlook will support these larger personal folders? > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST files larger than 2GB
A bunch of ways: Q114491 -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB Does anyone have the address where we can mail Microsoft the clues necessary for them to remove that P.O.S.[1] "personal folders" service from Outlook and finally relegate PST files to the same junk pile as 8 inch floppy disks. [1] P.O.S. as defined by Will Smith in Men in Black when referring to the car. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: PST files larger than 2GB They said that just before people starting to throw stuff at them. After the presenters suffered from that ... we don't know if this limit will be implemented by MS ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:13 PM Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > I believe the 32TB number was announced in the last MEC. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > 32 TB??? > > The unlimited version of Exchange will only support 16 TB. > > Details! Sources! > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without > communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > 32TB and likely none of the currently shipping versions. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:39 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: PST files larger than 2GB > > > > > > Maybe I am going mad but I am sure somewhere on this list someone > > mentioned Microsoft were developing pst that had unlimited capacity > > (or certainly more than the current 2GB) is this true? What version > > of Outlook will support these larger personal folders? > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. =
RE: Smtp connector gone mad?
hmmm, a mad server eh.. Maybe you should stop giving the server absente... -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? OK. Make it so. I have like 30 domains that we accept mail for. Please give some more details on EXACTLY what you want to accomplish and we can try to help you out. Otherwise we're guessing or making stuff up. Some people on this list have very vivid imaginations and you wouldn't want that. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 5:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? Yeah I know I have not provided all the info, sorry. We have multiple domain names and want to accept messages into the org from the internet via this connector. Regards Leo > You don't need an SMTP connector for sending and receiving email. > that might just be what the "SMTP virtual server" is for? > > -Original Message- > From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:43 PM > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List > Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? > Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? > > We want to be able to accept incoming email from the internet. > > Leo > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST files larger than 2GB
Does anyone have the address where we can mail Microsoft the clues necessary for them to remove that P.O.S.[1] "personal folders" service from Outlook and finally relegate PST files to the same junk pile as 8 inch floppy disks. [1] P.O.S. as defined by Will Smith in Men in Black when referring to the car. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: PST files larger than 2GB They said that just before people starting to throw stuff at them. After the presenters suffered from that ... we don't know if this limit will be implemented by MS ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:13 PM Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > I believe the 32TB number was announced in the last MEC. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > 32 TB??? > > The unlimited version of Exchange will only support 16 TB. > > Details! Sources! > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence without > communications irrelevant -- Gen. Alfred M. Gray, USMC > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB > > > 32TB and likely none of the currently shipping versions. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:39 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: PST files larger than 2GB > > > > > > Maybe I am going mad but I am sure somewhere on this list > > someone mentioned Microsoft were developing pst that had > > unlimited capacity (or certainly more than the current 2GB) > > is this true? What version of Outlook will support these > > larger personal folders? > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Smtp connector gone mad?
OK. Make it so. I have like 30 domains that we accept mail for. Please give some more details on EXACTLY what you want to accomplish and we can try to help you out. Otherwise we're guessing or making stuff up. Some people on this list have very vivid imaginations and you wouldn't want that. -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 5:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? Yeah I know I have not provided all the info, sorry. We have multiple domain names and want to accept messages into the org from the internet via this connector. Regards Leo > You don't need an SMTP connector for sending and receiving email. > that might just be what the "SMTP virtual server" is for? > > -Original Message- > From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:43 PM > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List > Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? > Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? > > We want to be able to accept incoming email from the internet. > > Leo > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
Oops, I must've missed that. I only picked up the bit about stopping Outlook using the logged on user for authentication -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 May 2002 10:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Uh huh... that "in the end" would be what we suggested yesterday, then! :) -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Robert, Yes, thats exactly what I was looking for. Although I used the term Security, its in its loosest sense, as its more to stop people just casually browsing anothers email. If they know how to change that setting, then they are willing to live with that. By giving everyone access to her logon suggests what security risk it poses. In the end, I went a step further and created a new NT account for her mailbox, meaning anyone can know her NT user password for the purposes of accessing the fax system, but now she has to enter the new NT account info when starting her email. The feature I needed was the "logon network security" option, as without turning that off, it would just return saying "don't have permissions to access". thanks Nik -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 16 May 2002 17:26 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > > > Sorry, I didn't make myself clear > > This machine is intended for anyone to walk onto to forward faxes, > Zetafax sends all faxes to a default logon, so this machine needs to > be logged on in her username so the faxes go to it Then consider the solution Gary and I suggested. It will stop people "casually" viewing her email. If that's not robust enough for you, then you've got big problems because its not easy to secure stuff on the one hand and let everyone use her account on the other. One either secures stuff 100% properly or one leaves holes someone malicious could drive a truck through. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
Uh huh... that "in the end" would be what we suggested yesterday, then! :) -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Robert, Yes, thats exactly what I was looking for. Although I used the term Security, its in its loosest sense, as its more to stop people just casually browsing anothers email. If they know how to change that setting, then they are willing to live with that. By giving everyone access to her logon suggests what security risk it poses. In the end, I went a step further and created a new NT account for her mailbox, meaning anyone can know her NT user password for the purposes of accessing the fax system, but now she has to enter the new NT account info when starting her email. The feature I needed was the "logon network security" option, as without turning that off, it would just return saying "don't have permissions to access". thanks Nik -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 16 May 2002 17:26 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > > > Sorry, I didn't make myself clear > > This machine is intended for anyone to walk onto to forward faxes, > Zetafax sends all faxes to a default logon, so this machine needs to > be logged on in her username so the faxes go to it Then consider the solution Gary and I suggested. It will stop people "casually" viewing her email. If that's not robust enough for you, then you've got big problems because its not easy to secure stuff on the one hand and let everyone use her account on the other. One either secures stuff 100% properly or one leaves holes someone malicious could drive a truck through. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Smtp connector gone mad?
Yeah I know I have not provided all the info, sorry. We have multiple domain names and want to accept messages into the org from the internet via this connector. Regards Leo > You don't need an SMTP connector for sending and receiving email. > that might just be what the "SMTP virtual server" is for? > > -Original Message- > From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:43 PM > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List > Conversation: Smtp connector gone mad? > Subject: RE: Smtp connector gone mad? > > We want to be able to accept incoming email from the internet. > > Leo > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
Robert, Yes, thats exactly what I was looking for. Although I used the term Security, its in its loosest sense, as its more to stop people just casually browsing anothers email. If they know how to change that setting, then they are willing to live with that. By giving everyone access to her logon suggests what security risk it poses. In the end, I went a step further and created a new NT account for her mailbox, meaning anyone can know her NT user password for the purposes of accessing the fax system, but now she has to enter the new NT account info when starting her email. The feature I needed was the "logon network security" option, as without turning that off, it would just return saying "don't have permissions to access". thanks Nik -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > -Original Message- > From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 16 May 2002 17:26 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing Outlook > > > Sorry, I didn't make myself clear > > This machine is intended for anyone to walk onto to forward faxes, > Zetafax sends all faxes to a default logon, so this machine needs to > be logged on in her username so the faxes go to it Then consider the solution Gary and I suggested. It will stop people "casually" viewing her email. If that's not robust enough for you, then you've got big problems because its not easy to secure stuff on the one hand and let everyone use her account on the other. One either secures stuff 100% properly or one leaves holes someone malicious could drive a truck through. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Mail mjgration
Chris, Not really what happens is that each contract basically has to look after itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central source unless the contract is being held to ransom. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Mail mjgration http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/MSmail.asp I've got to imagine that EDS has better docs internally on the subject, but here ya go... I don't think Microsoft really updated the MS Mail docs for E2K. > -Original Message- > From: Caisley, Simon (EDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:00 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MS Mail mjgration > > > Hi, > > I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find on > microsoft.com so was hoping someone could send me this > direct. I am looking for a document on migrating from MS > Mail to Exchange 5.5 and would be grateful if someone has a > document or guide of some description they can pass on. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
