Re: Problem with accessing a PF

[Tony Hlabse]

what about aging limits
- Original Message -
From: "Parrnelli GS11 Ben T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:44 PM
Subject: Problem with accessing a PF


> NT 4 SP6a SRP
> Exchange 5.5 SP4
>
> I have what started as one, but is now up to four users who will lose
access
> to some of our public folders at seemingly random intervals.
>
> This has happened to the original user about three times in the last month
> to six weeks.  The user has reviewer permission to the folder through a
> distribution list, and will still be listed in the DL, but cannot see the
> contents of the folder.  Also, he does not get the error message about not
> having permission, just, "Unable to display the folder".
>
> He can, however, read the subfolders he has permission to that are
> underneath this folder. (and to which he has the exact same rights!)
>
> The only temporary fix we had found was to remove the user from the DL,
wait
> for replication to complete, then re-add his account to the DL, but lately
> that hasn't been working either.  Also, giving him reviewer rights by name
> to the folder does not work.
>
> To throw one last curve in, the users can access these folders through
OWA.
>
> So far, this has happened to three users on the same folder, and a fourth
> user on a different folder.
>
> Any solutions, suggestions or WAGs would be most appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Ben Parrnelli
> Network Administrator
> Comm & Data Directorate
> MAGTF Training Command
> Twentynine Palms, CA 92278
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problem with accessing a PF

[Parrnelli GS11 Ben T]

NT 4 SP6a SRP
Exchange 5.5 SP4

I have what started as one, but is now up to four users who will lose access
to some of our public folders at seemingly random intervals.

This has happened to the original user about three times in the last month
to six weeks.  The user has reviewer permission to the folder through a
distribution list, and will still be listed in the DL, but cannot see the
contents of the folder.  Also, he does not get the error message about not
having permission, just, "Unable to display the folder".

He can, however, read the subfolders he has permission to that are
underneath this folder. (and to which he has the exact same rights!)

The only temporary fix we had found was to remove the user from the DL, wait
for replication to complete, then re-add his account to the DL, but lately
that hasn't been working either.  Also, giving him reviewer rights by name
to the folder does not work.

To throw one last curve in, the users can access these folders through OWA.

So far, this has happened to three users on the same folder, and a fourth
user on a different folder.  

Any solutions, suggestions or WAGs would be most appreciated.

Thanks.


Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm & Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
Twentynine Palms, CA 92278

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Stephen Mynhier]

It wsa a really good idea based on the assumption that if an
administrator didn't know what it was, he would find out BEFORE doing
anything with it

On second thought, it was just a bad idea

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:09 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Drive m:
Subject: RE: Drive m:


Sure there is. He has evidence. I have evidence. We've all seen it. It
was just an unfortunate implementation on MS part.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive...

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports
that I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan
the M: and gets an error thrown... my backup software.. which also uses
the disaster recovery otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an
access denied.. and when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and
try to check it.. shows me all the folders of the informtaion store..
but nothing beyond that.. says that I can see the permissions.. but cant
change anything on that... I think we should check the microsoft site
for more info.. and evidently the norton anti-virus site recommends that
a filter be set on the anti-virus software to avoid scanning the M:

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard
the possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
>
>
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed 
> Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive 
> m:. Note, that the server (and all of our
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Stephen Mynhier]

I've heard of lots of people using drive M extensively!

They change permissions And destroy their database
They scan it for viruses. And destroy their database
They play with it cuz it's there And destroy their database

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:42 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Drive m:
Subject: RE: Drive m:


M: drive just allows access to your Exchange server via the file system
(i.e. Windows Explorer).  Although it may have some applications, I've
never heard of anyone using it extensively.  You definitely can live
without it.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Drive m:


Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed
Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:.
Note, that the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a
drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

Do we need it?

Thanks,

Arch

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Stephen Mynhier]

This is not the drive you are looking for


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:34 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Drive m:
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard
the possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What is a TAM?

[John Strongosky]

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is a TAM?


Technical Account Manager for Premier and Alliance customers of
Microsoft

-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:16 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: What is a TAM?
Subject: What is a TAM?


In the link below there is a reference to contact a TAM for the mbinfo
app

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm


"A2: There's an app called mbinfo which can extract it for you. Contact
your TAM for a copy if you don't have it."

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: What is a TAM?

[Stephen Mynhier]

Technical Account Manager for Premier and Alliance customers of
Microsoft

-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:16 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: What is a TAM?
Subject: What is a TAM?


In the link below there is a reference to contact a TAM for the mbinfo
app

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm


"A2: There's an app called mbinfo which can extract it for you. Contact
your TAM for a copy if you don't have it."

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

What is a TAM?

[John Strongosky]

In the link below there is a reference to contact a TAM for the mbinfo
app

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm


"A2: There's an app called mbinfo which can extract it for you. Contact your
TAM for a copy if you don't have it."

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Martin Blackstone]

You're gonna need em!

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


I hope you have good backups

-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that
I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan the M: and
gets an error thrown... my backup software.. which also uses the disaster
recovery otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an access denied.. and
when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and try to check it.. shows
me all the folders of the informtaion store.. but nothing beyond that.. says
that I can see the permissions.. but cant change anything on that... 
I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently the
norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on the anti-virus
software to avoid scanning the M:

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

[Steve Sorenson]

You get what you pay for.


> -Original Message-
> From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> Definitely some very inexpensive recreational pharmaceuticals.
> 
> John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
> Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
> (404) 239 - 2981
> 
> Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until 
> defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in 
> anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an 
> urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat 
> simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a 
> path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> Are you on crack?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> > 
> > 
> > To all the girls I've loved before
> > Who traveled in and out my door
> > I'm glad they came along
> > I dedicate this song
> > To all the girls I've loved before
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[John Allhiser]

KC.   Bryant's on Brooklyn around lunchtime.  :)

Seriously, I somewhat stumbled into MS Exchange administration 
and this list a few years ago.  Any question I've ever thought 
I had has been answered by 1)research and 2)someone on this list.


-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


When and where John?

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Real friends pay my tab...

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


You all are my friends here.  Thanks...

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers.

Google is your friend here.  :^)

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Yeah really...  I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue.  Sorry.

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Really?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List adm

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[Mitchell Mike]

When and where John?

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Real friends pay my tab...

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


You all are my friends here.  Thanks...

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers.

Google is your friend here.  :^)

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Yeah really...  I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue.  Sorry.

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Really?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[John Allhiser]

Real friends pay my tab...

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


You all are my friends here.  Thanks...

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers.

Google is your friend here.  :^)

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Yeah really...  I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue.  Sorry.

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Really?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[Mitchell Mike]

You all are my friends here.  Thanks...

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers.

Google is your friend here.  :^)

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Yeah really...  I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue.  Sorry.

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Really?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[John Allhiser]

A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers.

Google is your friend here.  :^)

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Yeah really...  I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue.  Sorry.

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Really?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[Mitchell Mike]

Yeah really...  I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue.  Sorry.

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


Really?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[John Allhiser]

Really?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
b eing used


What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[Mitchell Mike]

What is Scanmail and what is it used for?

Thanks..

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Christopher Hummert]

I have 3 of them if you want one

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


An M: drive just popped up on my machine from nowhere.

Joseph Smith

Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


Time to go fishing... Where's my cane pole.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary,
and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my
goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is
a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


I believe I opened a can of worms!

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard
the possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Smith Joseph]

An M: drive just popped up on my machine from nowhere.

Joseph Smith

Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


Time to go fishing... Where's my cane pole.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


I believe I opened a can of worms!

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just 
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[John Matteson]

Time to go fishing... Where's my cane pole.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


I believe I opened a can of worms!

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just 
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Arch Willingham]

I believe I opened a can of worms!

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just 
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange not connecting to remote sites

[Arch Willingham]

Prior to our upgrade, had our Exchange 5.5 server receive all e-mails and
then they got forwarded to our remote site. I installed the ADC connector
and then upgraded to Exchange 2000. The remote site is still on Exchange
5.5.

Two questions:

1. It is very difficult to tell how the replication is supposed to work (it
was easy in 5.5). The connector came over in the upgrade but I can't tell if
it works.
2. How do you make it where the users at the other site show up in the GAL
like they did in 5.5?

Thanks,

Arch Willingham

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

[Bowles, John L.]

That's a good tune man.

___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE


Definitely some very inexpensive recreational pharmaceuticals.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary,
and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my
goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is
a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE


Are you on crack?

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> To all the girls I've loved before
> Who traveled in and out my door
> I'm glad they came along
> I dedicate this song
> To all the girls I've loved before

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

[John Matteson]

Definitely some very inexpensive recreational pharmaceuticals.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981

Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE


Are you on crack?

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> To all the girls I've loved before
> Who traveled in and out my door
> I'm glad they came along
> I dedicate this song
> To all the girls I've loved before

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Moving site from one server to another

[Christopher Hummert]

Title: Message



You 
also have a problem with your e-mailsyour sending out footer 
attachments
 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of George 
  HalsteadSent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:05 PMTo: Exchange 
  DiscussionsSubject: Moving site from one server to 
  another
  We are have a hard 
  ware problem on an Exchange server and we want to move the site from that 
  server to a new one within the same org.  Can that be done?  And if 
  so once the move is made can you shut down the original server and expect the 
  new server to run with out problems. 
   
  Thank you for any 
  help.
   
  George W. 
  Halstead
  712 Anderman Lane
  Suite 403
  Darien IL, 60561630-986-1528
  http://www.CompuOneNetwork.com
   

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Moving site from one server to another

[George Halstead]

Title: Message



We are have a hard 
ware problem on an Exchange server and we want to move the site from that server 
to a new one within the same org.  Can that be done?  And if so once 
the move is made can you shut down the original server and expect the new server 
to run with out problems. 
 
Thank you for any 
help.
 
George W. 
Halstead
712 Anderman Lane
Suite 403
Darien IL, 60561630-986-1528
http://www.CompuOneNetwork.com
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[MS Exchange List]

Hello,

I think it has gotten more complicated than 5.5, especially for different hardware.  
If you're going by the DR doc, light candles, make sacrifices, etc... that you'll be 
able to restore the System State to your different hardware. 

They have updated the E2K DR doc from the original one.  The new version of the E2K 
Disaster Recovery Doc (looks like released in March of this year) gives more warning 
of this than the earlier August 2000 DR doc, and some tips about using Safe mode, 
etc

The DR Mailbox Recovery Doc 
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/MailboxRecovery.doc  goes 
into more about recovering a server without restoring the System State, and what 
attributes you may need to modify.  It does not appear to have been updated since the 
original August 2000 release.

Good Luck,
Brent

-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:08 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange List
Conversation: restore exchange to different hardware
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


I'm sorry that I did not mentioned it in subject or message body ...
I'm talking about exchange 2000 on w2000 server AD controller .

So there is more things to do than restoring Exchange 5.5.

So can anyone help me with excchange 2000 on w2000 AD controller ? Once again thanks 
for any advie ...


Bye, Honza Novak

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S and Exchange level 
(version, sp etc).  The only thing that might go wrong in your case is that the 
previous system had a multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be single proc HAL.  

Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.

See http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


Hello, 
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not able to buy 
excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan thunder k7). We want 
to restore uor server from backups to a different machine whis is 1 proc, AMD Athlon. 
Is it possible to restore it to that machine ? 

If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this scenario ? 

Thanks a lot for any advice 

Bye, Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT Upgrade question

[Chinnery Paul]

Jumping in...
That, support going away, was a major selling point for us to get our
servers moved to Win 2000. (Actually, we also told them that our servers
probably would be too slow to run 2K, so we're gettting new servers, too).
It's crazy because our users are complaining about how slow the system is
now.  Yet, our selling point was support ending.
Oh, well. I guess whatever convinces them as long as it's honest.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question


The last thing you want to hear, when or if you need it, is "Dude, you are
so not supported".

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Bryant
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question


If its "not broke" you don't need support so who cares if support is
available?

Eventually the "increased functionality" may be of value to the higher
ups,
after one of them hears about some great thing from a buddy on the golf
course, etc. Address it then. Meanwhile, show them how much money you've
saved them by not upgrading and ask for a portion of those savings as a
bonus.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question
>
>
> The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 &
> E5.5 are closer
> to becoming non-supported.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT Upgrade question
>
>
> We're a smaller
> company(
> <40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.
> Both run great and
> have been very stable (knock on wood).
>
> My question is how do you approach upper management asking to
> upgrade to
> Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't
> broke, don't fix
> it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional
> functionality" route,
> but they're not buying it.
>
> Mike
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


 ==



Confidentiality Notice:   The information contained in this electronic
document is considered a confidential and/or privileged communication
between John Burnham Insurance Services and the addressee(s). If the
recipient(s) of this email communication is not the addressee(s), such
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited from photocopying, distributing or
otherwise using this email or its contents and/or attachment(s) in any
way.  If you received this message in error, please contact the sender
listed above by any contact means listed. Thank you!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT Upgrade question

[Schwartz, Jim]

If your management likes Gartner reports, they suggest that the "must move
off 5.5 date" to be 2Q04.

When you think about non-support, you should also factor in that more and
more technical folks are moving to E2K. The list of people that can run a
5.5 organization is going to get shorter and they'll have a harder time
replacing you when you go work for a company that will upgrade. Just ask the
mainframers how hard a time they had finding qualified Cobol programmers
during Y2K.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question


The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 & E5.5 are closer
to becoming non-supported.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT Upgrade question


We're a smaller
company(
<40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.  Both run great and
have been very stable (knock on wood).

My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to
Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't broke, don't fix
it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional functionality" route, but
they're not buying it.

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[William Lefkovics]

Of course there is.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive...


Crgre: Jryy, bxnl. V sbhaq gur anzr Mhhy sbe lbh. (ernqvat bss n cvrpr
bs
cncre) Gur anzr Mhhy ersref gb n qrzv-tbq jbefuvccrq nebhaq 6000 OP ol
gur... jung'f gung jbeq? 
Qnan: Uvggvgrf. 
Crgre: Uvggvgrf, gur Zrfbcbgnzvnaf naq gur Fhzrevnaf. 
Qnan: (ernqvat) Mhhy jnf gur zvavba bs Tbmre. Jung'f Tbmre? 
Crgre: Tbmre jnf irel ovt va Fhzrevn. Ovt thl. 

> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Sure there is. He has evidence. I have evidence. We've all
> seen it. It was just an unfortunate implementation on MS part.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> There is no M: drive...
> 
> --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
> http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are
> some reports that I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus 
> software tries to scan the M: and gets an error thrown... my 
> backup software.. which also uses the disaster recovery 
> otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an access denied.. 
> and when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and try 
> to check it.. shows me all the folders of the informtaion 
> store.. but nothing beyond that.. says that I can see the 
> permissions.. but cant change anything on that... I think we 
> should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently 
> the norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on 
> the anti-virus software to avoid scanning the M:
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever
> even heard the possibility of the existence of such a thing.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Drive m:
> >
> >
> > Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed
> > Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive 
> > m:. Note, that the server (and all of our
> > workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that 
> the conflict?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT Upgrade question

[Ray Zorz]

The last thing you want to hear, when or if you need it, is "Dude, you are
so not supported".

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Bryant
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question


If its "not broke" you don't need support so who cares if support is
available?

Eventually the "increased functionality" may be of value to the higher
ups,
after one of them hears about some great thing from a buddy on the golf
course, etc. Address it then. Meanwhile, show them how much money you've
saved them by not upgrading and ask for a portion of those savings as a
bonus.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question
>
>
> The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 &
> E5.5 are closer
> to becoming non-supported.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT Upgrade question
>
>
> We're a smaller
> company(
> <40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.
> Both run great and
> have been very stable (knock on wood).
>
> My question is how do you approach upper management asking to
> upgrade to
> Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't
> broke, don't fix
> it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional
> functionality" route,
> but they're not buying it.
>
> Mike
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


 ==



Confidentiality Notice:   The information contained in this electronic
document is considered a confidential and/or privileged communication
between John Burnham Insurance Services and the addressee(s). If the
recipient(s) of this email communication is not the addressee(s), such
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited from photocopying, distributing or
otherwise using this email or its contents and/or attachment(s) in any
way.  If you received this message in error, please contact the sender
listed above by any contact means listed. Thank you!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT Upgrade question

[Mike Omilian]

Bonus?  Yeah, right.  Our salary people had to take a 10% paycut that was
only supposed to be for 1 month.  Well, 4 months later that cut is still
here.

> If its "not broke" you don't need support so who cares if support is
> available?
> 
> Eventually the "increased functionality" may be of value to the higher
> ups,
> after one of them hears about some great thing from a buddy on the golf
> course, etc. Address it then. Meanwhile, show them how much money you've
> saved them by not upgrading and ask for a portion of those savings as a
> bonus.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question
> > 
> > 
> > The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 & 
> > E5.5 are closer
> > to becoming non-supported.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: OT Upgrade question
> > 
> > 
> > We're a smaller
> > company(40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.  
> > Both run great and
> > have been very stable (knock on wood).
> > 
> > My question is how do you approach upper management asking to 
> > upgrade to
> > Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't 
> > broke, don't fix
> > it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional 
> > functionality" route,
> > but they're not buying it.
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>  
> 
>  ==
> 
>  
> 
> Confidentiality Notice:   The information contained in this electronic
> document is considered a confidential and/or privileged communication
> between John Burnham Insurance Services and the addressee(s). If the
> recipient(s) of this email communication is not the addressee(s), such
> recipient(s) is strictly prohibited from photocopying, distributing or
> otherwise using this email or its contents and/or attachment(s) in any
> way.  If you received this message in error, please contact the sender
> listed above by any contact means listed. Thank you!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Help

[Crumbaker, Ron]

OK.

Why when I go to do a new mail message does it ask for Office STD CD?


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Help


OWA does not render the GAL.

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Crumbaker, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Help


I am having problems with my Exchange 2000 SP2 and OWA.
 
When I am OWA, it wants the Office 2000 Standard CD, when I click on New
Mail.  Then it will NOT display the global address list, it only lists
the items in the contacts.
 
HELP!!

Thank you,
 
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
PC Systems Administrator
MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT Upgrade question

[Chuck Bryant]

If its "not broke" you don't need support so who cares if support is
available?

Eventually the "increased functionality" may be of value to the higher
ups,
after one of them hears about some great thing from a buddy on the golf
course, etc. Address it then. Meanwhile, show them how much money you've
saved them by not upgrading and ask for a portion of those savings as a
bonus.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question
> 
> 
> The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 & 
> E5.5 are closer
> to becoming non-supported.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT Upgrade question
> 
> 
> We're a smaller
> company(
> <40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.  
> Both run great and
> have been very stable (knock on wood).
> 
> My question is how do you approach upper management asking to 
> upgrade to
> Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't 
> broke, don't fix
> it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional 
> functionality" route,
> but they're not buying it.
> 
> Mike
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
 

 ==

 

Confidentiality Notice:   The information contained in this electronic
document is considered a confidential and/or privileged communication
between John Burnham Insurance Services and the addressee(s). If the
recipient(s) of this email communication is not the addressee(s), such
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited from photocopying, distributing or
otherwise using this email or its contents and/or attachment(s) in any
way.  If you received this message in error, please contact the sender
listed above by any contact means listed. Thank you!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K - The fix

[alantzos]

For info

See Q289869 on the FTP view problem and Q293386 just about covers the second
issue.

-Original Message-
From: Lantzos Antony 
Sent: 21 May 2002 08:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K

I have an upgraded 5.5 server now on E2K sp2 which responds with FTP type
browsing when accessing the OWA.

I'm not getting any errors.  I had to follow a few Q's as the exchfilt.dll
did not swap to the new version on upgrade, not sure if this is related.
Also the /exadmin virtual was missing.  I have added this.  The application
still not seem to start.

Also the server has recipient policies to accept mail from other domain
names.  These never authenticate via OWA, any reason for this?  Ive tried
adding another virtual HTTP server for the said mailboxes/domains, but no
joy.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT Upgrade question

[Jeremy I. Shannon]

If you have remote users, show them the new OWA.  That functionality alone convinced 
management here.

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question


take a bat to the server



-Original Message-
From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT Upgrade question


We're a smaller
company(
<40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.  Both run great
and have been very stable (knock on wood).

My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to
Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't broke, don't
fix
it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional functionality" route,
but they're not buying it.

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT Upgrade question

[Ryan Malayter]

If they've determined the additional functionality isn't worth the cost,
why should you upgrade? Wait to upgrade until MS is discontinuing
support for your versions.

 
-Original Message-
From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:12 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: OT Upgrade question
Subject: OT Upgrade question


We're a smaller
company(
<40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.  Both run great
and have been very stable (knock on wood).

My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to
Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't broke, don't
fix
it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional functionality" route,
but they're not buying it.

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT Upgrade question

[Ray Zorz]

The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 & E5.5 are closer
to becoming non-supported.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT Upgrade question


We're a smaller
company(
<40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.  Both run great and
have been very stable (knock on wood).

My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to
Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't broke, don't fix
it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional functionality" route,
but they're not buying it.

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Christopher Hummert]

I am the gatekeeper

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Omilian
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


Are you the Keymaster?

> There is only Zuul.
> (2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference)
> JP
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> There is no M: drive...=20
> 
> --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond 
> http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
> 
> 
> 
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Avi Smith-Rapaport]

what is spies like us



-Original Message-
From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


Are you the Keymaster?

> There is only Zuul.
> (2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference)
> JP
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> There is no M: drive...=20
> 
> --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
> http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
> 
> 
> 
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Mike Omilian]

Are you the Keymaster?

> There is only Zuul.
> (2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference)
> JP
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> There is no M: drive...=20
> 
> --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
> http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
> 
> 
> 
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT Upgrade question

[Avi Smith-Rapaport]

take a bat to the server



-Original Message-
From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT Upgrade question


We're a smaller
company(
<40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.  Both run great
and have been very stable (knock on wood).

My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to
Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't broke, don't
fix
it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional functionality" route,
but they're not buying it.

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Ray Zorz]

Ghostbusters?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeremy Pinquist
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is only Zuul.
(2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference)
JP

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive... 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!



List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Chris Scharff]

There is no M: drive...


Crgre: Jryy, bxnl. V sbhaq gur anzr Mhhy sbe lbh. (ernqvat bss n cvrpr bs
cncre) Gur anzr Mhhy ersref gb n qrzv-tbq jbefuvccrq nebhaq 6000 OP ol
gur... jung'f gung jbeq? 
Qnan: Uvggvgrf. 
Crgre: Uvggvgrf, gur Zrfbcbgnzvnaf naq gur Fhzrevnaf. 
Qnan: (ernqvat) Mhhy jnf gur zvavba bs Tbmre. Jung'f Tbmre? 
Crgre: Tbmre jnf irel ovt va Fhzrevn. Ovt thl. 

> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Sure there is. He has evidence. I have evidence. We've all 
> seen it. It was just an unfortunate implementation on MS part.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> There is no M: drive...
> 
> --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond 
> http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:46 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are 
> some reports that I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus 
> software tries to scan the M: and gets an error thrown... my 
> backup software.. which also uses the disaster recovery 
> otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an access denied.. 
> and when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and try 
> to check it.. shows me all the folders of the informtaion 
> store.. but nothing beyond that.. says that I can see the 
> permissions.. but cant change anything on that... I think we 
> should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently 
> the norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on 
> the anti-virus software to avoid scanning the M:
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever 
> even heard the possibility of the existence of such a thing.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Drive m:
> >
> >
> > Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed 
> > Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive 
> > m:. Note, that the server (and all of our
> > workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that 
> the conflict?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT Upgrade question

[Mike Omilian]

We're a smaller
company(
<40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5.  Both run great and have been 
very stable (knock on wood).

My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to
Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the "if it ain't broke, don't fix
it" mentality?  I've already tried the "additional functionality" route,
but they're not buying it.

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Ray Zorz]

Sure there is. He has evidence. I have evidence. We've all seen it. It was
just an unfortunate implementation on MS part.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive...

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports
that I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan
the M: and gets an error thrown... my backup software.. which also uses
the disaster recovery otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an
access denied.. and when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and
try to check it.. shows me all the folders of the informtaion store..
but nothing beyond that.. says that I can see the permissions.. but cant
change anything on that...
I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently
the norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on the
anti-virus software to avoid scanning the M:

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard
the possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
>
>
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Kevin Miller]

Give me something simpler gozzer.

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Pinquist
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is only Zuul.
(2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference)
JP

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive... 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!



List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Help

[Kevin Miller]

OWA does not render the GAL.

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Crumbaker, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Help


I am having problems with my Exchange 2000 SP2 and OWA.
 
When I am OWA, it wants the Office 2000 Standard CD, when I click on New
Mail.  Then it will NOT display the global address list, it only lists
the items in the contacts.
 
HELP!!

Thank you,
 
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
PC Systems Administrator
MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Jeremy Pinquist]

There is only Zuul.
(2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference)
JP

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive... 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!



List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?

[Tony Hlabse]

In late on this, but Q314917 helps understand what is going on when you get
these errors. May not help in this case but good to keep abreast of.


- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Parkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r
ead page checksum error -1018 ?


> Stephen,
> Do you have a link for ForeFront? Google is not giving me anything useful.
>
> Chuck
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
> r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
>
>
> Wander?
>
> Try a good general purpose hardware diag like ForeFront
>
> And it was the guy beside me that threw it... I swear!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:33 AM
> Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
> Conversation: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
> Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
> r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
>
>
> His name was Fred.
>
> He gave me the same warnings about the -1018. Unfortunately "My hardware
> vendor" is not one person. That machine is a generic Intel machine that
> has been an Exchange server for years. It has an Adaptec 394x
> controller, 512 MB or RAM, two pretty fast, name brand hard drives, etc.
> As you know, that makes it worse as you don't know where to begin. Its
> like an umpire at a MLB game getting beaned by a bottle of Bud...who in
> the world threw it?
>
> Arch
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
> r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
>
>
> People who bitch about Microsoft (PSS at least) are generally also the
> same people who are incapable of formulating an intelligent technical
> question.
>
> You ought to be on the phone with your hardware vendor at the moment as
> well, your -1018 error is a hardware related issue, and you'll need some
> parts swapage to keep this from happening again. Oh and take good
> notes from the PSS feller and tell him we all say hi.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:51 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
> > Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> >
> >
> > I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone
> > bitch#s about Microsoftthat guy could not have been
> > nicer. He confirmed my problem and is helping me get it fixed
> > as I type this.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
> >
> > Arch
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:41 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
> > Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> >
> >
> > 1018 errors? Oh oh.
> > I would call PSS. Dont wait on us.
> >
> >
> > Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and
> > main phone number have changed however we have not moved.
> >
> > T. U. Parks Construction Company
> > P.O. Box 3308
> > Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
> > Phone:423-648-3800
> >
> > If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office
> > personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone
> number have changed however we have not moved.
>
> T. U. Parks Construction Company
> P.O. Box 3308
> Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
> Phone:423-648-3800
>
> If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel,
> contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Ryan Malayter]

Okay, I wasn't really thinking about golf clubs, booze, football tickets, or vacation 
travel.

So I guess it's just "The best $245 of your company's money you'll ever spend when 
there's a server down and you don't know what the hell you're doing."

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:18 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: restore exchange to different hardware
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


I can think of a hundred better ways to spend 245 dollars.

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


Call Microsoft PSS... They'll walk you through it. Best $245 you'll ever
spend.

-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:08 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: restore exchange to different hardware
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


I'm sorry that I did not mentioned it in subject or message body ...
I'm talking about exchange 2000 on w2000 server AD controller .

So there is more things to do than restoring Exchange 5.5.

So can anyone help me with excchange 2000 on w2000 AD controller ? Once
again thanks for any advie ...


Bye, Honza Novak

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S and Exchange
level (version, sp etc).  The only thing that might go wrong in your case is
that the previous system had a multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be
single proc HAL.  

Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.

See
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


Hello, 
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not
able to buy excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan
thunder k7). We want to restore uor server from backups to a different
machine whis is 1 proc, AMD Athlon. Is it possible to restore it to that
machine ? 

If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this scenario ? 

Thanks a lot for any advice 

Bye, Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Kevin Miller]

There is no M: drive... 

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports
that I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan
the M: and gets an error thrown... my backup software.. which also uses
the disaster recovery otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an
access denied.. and when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and
try to check it.. shows me all the folders of the informtaion store..
but nothing beyond that.. says that I can see the permissions.. but cant
change anything on that... 
I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently
the norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on the
anti-virus software to avoid scanning the M:

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard
the possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Profile Maker How to?

[David Gibbons]

> Hey all
> 
> I'm maving quite a few problems with my exchange server move (yes I tested
> it and none of this stuff happened in test so I'm stuck with it).  I'm
> moving from one server to another and into another container.  I was using
> a 3rd party tool that failed me completly in the live enviroment
> (BindView).  So here I am, I need to update all the profiles in my company
> with a login scrip and wish to use Modprof from Microsoft.  I need it to
> append the new server name to the exchange profile, problem...  I can't
> figure out how to use the darn thing.  Does anyone have a sample *.prf
> that is not the Outlook.prf that you can download from Microsoft?  It has
> everything in it and I just need the exchange server and can't fiugure out
> how to pull all the unneeded text from it so I can test it.
> 
> Thanks
> David (Really tired with a caffee IV) Gibbons.

Sorry,
Windows 2000 Exchange 5.5sp4
win9x clients with outlook 2000

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Profile Maker How to?

[David Gibbons]

Hey all

I'm maving quite a few problems with my exchange server move (yes I tested
it and none of this stuff happened in test so I'm stuck with it).  I'm
moving from one server to another and into another container.  I was using
a 3rd party tool that failed me completly in the live enviroment
(BindView).  So here I am, I need to update all the profiles in my company
with a login scrip and wish to use Modprof from Microsoft.  I need it to
append the new server name to the exchange profile, problem...  I can't
figure out how to use the darn thing.  Does anyone have a sample *.prf
that is not the Outlook.prf that you can download from Microsoft?  It has
everything in it and I just need the exchange server and can't fiugure out
how to pull all the unneeded text from it so I can test it.

Thanks
David (Really tired with a caffee IV) Gibbons.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA Help

[Crumbaker, Ron]

I am having problems with my Exchange 2000 SP2 and OWA.
 
When I am OWA, it wants the Office 2000 Standard CD, when I click on New Mail.  Then 
it will NOT display the global address list, it only lists the items in the contacts.
 
HELP!!

Thank you,
 
Ron Crumbaker, MCP
PC Systems Administrator
MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

[Bob Razler]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Clearly this is the "To All The Girls I've Loved Before" virus
striking yet again. 

Robert J. Razler, Esq.
Approvals Manager
Heritage Building Group, Inc.
Suite A-100
3326 Old York Road
Furlong, PA 18925
215.794.0550, ext. 1117
www.heritagebuildinggroup.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Keys available at:
http://www.razler.com/PGPKey.htm

- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal,
Serdar
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE


I guess he meant to send it to the other "exchange" list.

Serdar Soysal


- -Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE


Are you on crack?

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> To all the girls I've loved before
> Who traveled in and out my door
> I'm glad they came along
> I dedicate this song
> To all the girls I've loved before

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use 

iQA/AwUBPOqXxWwjiy2yaukAEQKyYACcCd70i/YXnTfREtuTi9W4GiKM1pwAoKhI
m1Bv8k6yiiZQouwovzDdD4Xs
=ddwK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TO ALL WHO HAVE IMPLEMENTED E2K

[Erik Sojka]

Why yes.

Yes I am.

> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> Are you on crack?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> > 
> > 
> > To all the girls I've loved before
> > Who traveled in and out my door
> > I'm glad they came along
> > I dedicate this song
> > To all the girls I've loved before
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Chris Scharff]

There is no M: drive.

> -Original Message-
> From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are 
> some reports that I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus 
> software tries to scan the M: and gets an error thrown... my 
> backup software.. which also uses the disaster recovery 
> otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an access denied.. 
> and when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and try 
> to check it.. shows me all the folders of the informtaion 
> store.. but nothing beyond that.. says that I can see the 
> permissions.. but cant change anything on that... 
> I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. 
> and evidently the norton anti-virus site recommends that a 
> filter be set on the anti-virus software to avoid scanning the M:
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Drive m:
> 
> 
> There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever 
> even heard the
> possibility of the existence of such a thing.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Drive m:
> > 
> > 
> > Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just 
> > installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> > squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> > workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that 
> the conflict?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

[Soysal, Serdar]

I guess he meant to send it to the other "exchange" list.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE


Are you on crack?

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> To all the girls I've loved before
> Who traveled in and out my door
> I'm glad they came along
> I dedicate this song
> To all the girls I've loved before

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Dillon, Jeff]

title or mating call?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


quack


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


That will solve his problem?
http://flyingpenguinproductions.com/boards/

> -Original Message-
> From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:18 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> 
> 
> I can think of a hundred better ways to spend 245 dollars.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> 
> 
> Call Microsoft PSS... They'll walk you through it. Best $245 
> you'll ever spend.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:08 PM
> Posted To: Exchange List
> Conversation: restore exchange to different hardware
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> I'm sorry that I did not mentioned it in subject or message 
> body ... I'm talking about exchange 2000 on w2000 server AD 
> controller .
> 
> So there is more things to do than restoring Exchange 5.5.
> 
> So can anyone help me with excchange 2000 on w2000 AD 
> controller ? Once again thanks for any advie ...
> 
> 
> Bye, Honza Novak
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> 
> 
> The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S 
> and Exchange level (version, sp etc).  The only thing that 
> might go wrong in your case is that the previous system had a 
> multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be single proc HAL.  
> 
> Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.
> 
> See 
> http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/b
> ackuprestore.a
> sp
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Hello, 
> Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, 
> but we are not able to buy excatly same HW configuration for 
> new server (it was 2proc tyan thunder k7). We want to restore 
> uor server from backups to a different machine whis is 1 
> proc, AMD Athlon. Is it possible to restore it to that machine ? 
> 
> If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this 
> scenario ? 
> 
> Thanks a lot for any advice 
> 
> Bye, Honza Novak
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Soysal, Serdar]

Doh!

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that
I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan the M: and
gets an error thrown... my backup software.. which also uses the disaster
recovery otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an access denied.. and
when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and try to check it.. shows
me all the folders of the informtaion store.. but nothing beyond that.. says
that I can see the permissions.. but cant change anything on that... 
I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently the
norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on the anti-virus
software to avoid scanning the M:

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

[Andy David]

To all the girls I've cracked before...


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE


Are you on crack?

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> To all the girls I've loved before
> Who traveled in and out my door
> I'm glad they came along
> I dedicate this song
> To all the girls I've loved before

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Andy David]

I hope you have good backups

-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that
I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan the M: and
gets an error thrown... my backup software.. which also uses the disaster
recovery otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an access denied.. and
when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and try to check it.. shows
me all the folders of the informtaion store.. but nothing beyond that.. says
that I can see the permissions.. but cant change anything on that... 
I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently the
norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on the anti-virus
software to avoid scanning the M:

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just 
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

[Chris Scharff]

Are you on crack?

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
> 
> 
> To all the girls I've loved before
> Who traveled in and out my door
> I'm glad they came along
> I dedicate this song
> To all the girls I've loved before

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Muqeem Syed]

WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that I can 
forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan the M: and gets an error 
thrown... my backup software.. which also uses the disaster recovery otpion tries to 
do the same... and it gets an access denied.. and when I log in with the enetrprise 
admin as well. and try to check it.. shows me all the folders of the informtaion 
store.. but nothing beyond that.. says that I can see the permissions.. but cant 
change anything on that... 
I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently the norton 
anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on the anti-virus software to avoid 
scanning the M:

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:


There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just 
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE

[Erik Sojka]

To all the girls I've loved before
Who traveled in and out my door
I'm glad they came along
I dedicate this song
To all the girls I've loved before

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Soysal, Serdar]

M: drive just allows access to your Exchange server via the file system
(i.e. Windows Explorer).  Although it may have some applications, I've never
heard of anyone using it extensively.  You definitely can live without it.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Drive m:


Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange
2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that
the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:.
Is that the conflict?

Do we need it?

Thanks,

Arch

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Andy David]

quack


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


That will solve his problem?
http://flyingpenguinproductions.com/boards/

> -Original Message-
> From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:18 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> 
> 
> I can think of a hundred better ways to spend 245 dollars.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> 
> 
> Call Microsoft PSS... They'll walk you through it. Best $245 
> you'll ever spend.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:08 PM
> Posted To: Exchange List
> Conversation: restore exchange to different hardware
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> I'm sorry that I did not mentioned it in subject or message 
> body ... I'm talking about exchange 2000 on w2000 server AD 
> controller .
> 
> So there is more things to do than restoring Exchange 5.5.
> 
> So can anyone help me with excchange 2000 on w2000 AD 
> controller ? Once again thanks for any advie ...
> 
> 
> Bye, Honza Novak
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> 
> 
> The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S 
> and Exchange level (version, sp etc).  The only thing that 
> might go wrong in your case is that the previous system had a 
> multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be single proc HAL.  
> 
> Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.
> 
> See 
> http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/b
> ackuprestore.a
> sp
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Hello, 
> Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, 
> but we are not able to buy excatly same HW configuration for 
> new server (it was 2proc tyan thunder k7). We want to restore 
> uor server from backups to a different machine whis is 1 
> proc, AMD Athlon. Is it possible to restore it to that machine ? 
> 
> If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this 
> scenario ? 
> 
> Thanks a lot for any advice 
> 
> Bye, Honza Novak
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Drive m:????

[Chris Scharff]

There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the
possibility of the existence of such a thing.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Drive m:
> 
> 
> Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just 
> installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly 
> squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our 
> workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 2000 - where is the equiv. of the IMS eventvwr?

[Arch Willingham]

I just installed Exchange 2000 and am having difficulties finding things where there 
used to be. I used to set Exchange 5.5 so that I could see (in the eventvwr) when 
messages flowed in and out of our site (via IMS connector). Is there a way to do that 
now?

Thanks,

Arch

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Chris Scharff]

That will solve his problem?
http://flyingpenguinproductions.com/boards/

> -Original Message-
> From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:18 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> 
> 
> I can think of a hundred better ways to spend 245 dollars.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> 
> 
> Call Microsoft PSS... They'll walk you through it. Best $245 
> you'll ever spend.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:08 PM
> Posted To: Exchange List
> Conversation: restore exchange to different hardware
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> I'm sorry that I did not mentioned it in subject or message 
> body ... I'm talking about exchange 2000 on w2000 server AD 
> controller .
> 
> So there is more things to do than restoring Exchange 5.5.
> 
> So can anyone help me with excchange 2000 on w2000 AD 
> controller ? Once again thanks for any advie ...
> 
> 
> Bye, Honza Novak
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
> 
> 
> The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S 
> and Exchange level (version, sp etc).  The only thing that 
> might go wrong in your case is that the previous system had a 
> multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be single proc HAL.  
> 
> Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.
> 
> See 
> http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/b
> ackuprestore.a
> sp
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Hello, 
> Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, 
> but we are not able to buy excatly same HW configuration for 
> new server (it was 2proc tyan thunder k7). We want to restore 
> uor server from backups to a different machine whis is 1 
> proc, AMD Athlon. Is it possible to restore it to that machine ? 
> 
> If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this 
> scenario ? 
> 
> Thanks a lot for any advice 
> 
> Bye, Honza Novak
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Drive m:????

[Arch Willingham]

Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last 
night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of 
our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict?

Do we need it?

Thanks,

Arch

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Callan, Chris]

I can think of a hundred better ways to spend 245 dollars.

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


Call Microsoft PSS... They'll walk you through it. Best $245 you'll ever
spend.

-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:08 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: restore exchange to different hardware
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


I'm sorry that I did not mentioned it in subject or message body ...
I'm talking about exchange 2000 on w2000 server AD controller .

So there is more things to do than restoring Exchange 5.5.

So can anyone help me with excchange 2000 on w2000 AD controller ? Once
again thanks for any advie ...


Bye, Honza Novak

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S and Exchange
level (version, sp etc).  The only thing that might go wrong in your case is
that the previous system had a multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be
single proc HAL.  

Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.

See
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


Hello, 
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not
able to buy excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan
thunder k7). We want to restore uor server from backups to a different
machine whis is 1 proc, AMD Athlon. Is it possible to restore it to that
machine ? 

If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this scenario ? 

Thanks a lot for any advice 

Bye, Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[Stevens, Dave]

btw...I think if you upgrade ScanMail to the ESE version, it then does allow
you to determine the stale mailboxes.
dave

-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b
eing used


Check with NetIQ.  I think their AppAnalyzer tool might be able to do that.
Of course, it's pricey.

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being
used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Ryan Malayter]

Call Microsoft PSS... They'll walk you through it. Best $245 you'll ever spend.

-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:08 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: restore exchange to different hardware
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


I'm sorry that I did not mentioned it in subject or message body ...
I'm talking about exchange 2000 on w2000 server AD controller .

So there is more things to do than restoring Exchange 5.5.

So can anyone help me with excchange 2000 on w2000 AD controller ? Once again thanks 
for any advie ...


Bye, Honza Novak

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S and Exchange level 
(version, sp etc).  The only thing that might go wrong in your case is that the 
previous system had a multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be single proc HAL.  

Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.

See http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


Hello, 
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not able to buy 
excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan thunder k7). We want 
to restore uor server from backups to a different machine whis is 1 proc, AMD Athlon. 
Is it possible to restore it to that machine ? 

If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this scenario ? 

Thanks a lot for any advice 

Bye, Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: routing/relay issues

[Darcy Adams]

Use both settings: authenticated users and by IP.  The two are inclusive.  That is, 
the IMS will accept mail from authenticated users, and from listed IP's.

-Original Message-
From: Mike Rissen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: routing/relay issues


Scenario:

1) Company has Exchange 5.5 with all the service packs.
2) Company has user create a new account via web page.
3) User is immediately e-mailed an account and temporary password
 3.a)  email is NOT authenticated in any way.
 3.b)  scripting language is iHTML
 3.c)  User is almost always OUTSIDE the domain.
4) User changes password and is then allowed to do his thing.

Everything works GREAT until a group of people called ORDB come onto the
scene.

You see, the only way this works is that Relaying is enabled in the IMS
settings...also allowing spammers to mercilessly use their website and get
them BLACKLISTED.  Mail starts bouncing, connections being refused, etc. 
So turn off the routing except to only authenticated users?  BAM! every
e-mail functionality of the website dies.

I've tried placing routing restrictions on the IMS so that only the IP
address of the web server can use relaying.  Nope.  Even though the
scripting language is server side, the email seems to be originating from
the users IP.  

I know this because when we opened it up for that IP address, I could open
a browser on the server and everything works fine...but on another user's
machine inside the firewall...It dies.
_

Even though the user's IP address seems to be used, SOMETHING is going
through the server because the IP address in the iHTML is a 10.10.x.x
(non-routable).  Its inside the firewall.  Is it somehow translated?  Can
you explain that?  I didn't think I was net stupid...but alas
--
I thought about creating another IMS module in Exchange (books have talked
about doing this for other reasons) and have it answer on a secret port
(NOT 25).  Have this one totally open to relaying.  The iHTML can specify
a
specific port to connect to.  Stupid idea?  If someone found it..the whole
thing would start over again.  Is it possible?
--
I thought about having some process sitting somewhere  (maybe on the SQL
server) that would do the emailing and have it authenticate.  The iHTML
would then only add all the information into a table and be done with it.
The SQL server would check for records every minute or so and e-mail once
for each record it finds.  Client doesn't necessarily want this.


Any other advice or ideas from the gurus?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?

[Chuck Parkey]

Stephen,
Do you have a link for ForeFront? Google is not giving me anything useful.

Chuck

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
r ead page checksum error -1018 ?


Wander?

Try a good general purpose hardware diag like ForeFront

And it was the guy beside me that threw it... I swear!

-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:33 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
r ead page checksum error -1018 ?


His name was Fred.

He gave me the same warnings about the -1018. Unfortunately "My hardware
vendor" is not one person. That machine is a generic Intel machine that
has been an Exchange server for years. It has an Adaptec 394x
controller, 512 MB or RAM, two pretty fast, name brand hard drives, etc.
As you know, that makes it worse as you don't know where to begin. Its
like an umpire at a MLB game getting beaned by a bottle of Bud...who in
the world threw it?

Arch

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
r ead page checksum error -1018 ?


People who bitch about Microsoft (PSS at least) are generally also the
same people who are incapable of formulating an intelligent technical
question. 

You ought to be on the phone with your hardware vendor at the moment as
well, your -1018 error is a hardware related issue, and you'll need some
parts swapage to keep this from happening again. Oh and take good
notes from the PSS feller and tell him we all say hi.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) 
> Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> 
> 
> I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone
> bitch#s about Microsoftthat guy could not have been 
> nicer. He confirmed my problem and is helping me get it fixed 
> as I type this.
> 
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
> 
> Arch
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:41 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
> Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> 
> 
> 1018 errors? Oh oh.
> I would call PSS. Dont wait on us.
> 
> 
> Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and
> main phone number have changed however we have not moved.
> 
> T. U. Parks Construction Company
> P.O. Box 3308
> Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
> Phone:423-648-3800
> 
> If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office
> personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone
number have changed however we have not moved.

T. U. Parks Construction Company
P.O. Box 3308
Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
Phone:423-648-3800

If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel,
contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROT

RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....

[Darcy Adams]

Check with NetIQ.  I think their AppAnalyzer tool might be able to do that.  Of 
course, it's pricey.

-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer
being used


Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes
that are not currently being used.  Since we are using Trend Micro's
Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her
mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis.  Any help would be
appreciated.

James Casstevens.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Jan Novák]

I'm sorry that I did not mentioned it in subject or message body ...
I'm talking about exchange 2000 on w2000 server AD controller .

So there is more things to do than restoring Exchange 5.5.

So can anyone help me with excchange 2000 on w2000 AD controller ? Once again thanks 
for any advie ...


Bye, Honza Novak

-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: restore exchange to different hardware


The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S and Exchange level 
(version, sp etc).  The only thing that might go wrong in your case is that the 
previous system had a multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be single proc HAL.  

Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.

See http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


Hello, 
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not able to buy 
excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan thunder k7). We want 
to restore uor server from backups to a different machine whis is 1 proc, AMD Athlon. 
Is it possible to restore it to that machine ? 

If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this scenario ? 

Thanks a lot for any advice 

Bye, Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus/Spam filtering

[Tom Meunier]

Please email your questions to me offline; I'm interested in what they
are.  I have this product in production right now.   You're talking
about SAVfMSE 3.01, right?

> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:49 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Virus/Spam filtering
> Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering
> 
> 
> And that product sucks!!!  I just talked with their tech 
> yesterday about several questions I have, and even they admit 
> that since it's a version 1.0 product, there are lots of bugs 
> to be worked out.  I wouldn't recommend it for production use 
> any time soon...  
> 
> Andrew,
> MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:00 AM
> Posted To: DiscussionGroup
> Conversation: Virus/Spam filtering
> Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering
> 
> 
> Symantec has recently upgraded their NAV for Exchange to also 
> include Content/Spam filtering as well, and have gone to a 
> nice GUI for management.  This is only good for E2K though, 
> and they have not announced any plans to port it to 5.5
> 
> 
> hth,
> 
> Bob Sadler
> City of Leawood, KS, USA
> Internet/WAN Specialist
> 913-339-6700 X194
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering
> 
> 
> The original question (that was violently snipped) asked 
> about both content and virus scanning (hence the subject line 
> "Virus/Spam filtering").  It is true that TrendMicro is very 
> good on the virus scanning side, its eManager plug-in is just 
> a mediocre content filter. For virus scanning, Sybari's 
> Antigen is just as good.  You can't go wrong with either 
> product.  I believe Antigen has content filtering now as 
> well, but I haven't tested it yet.
> 
> For content filtering all of the three below are decent:
> - MIMESweeper: they are the leader in this field.  Very 
> strong product.
> - Praetor: good/cheaper alternative to MIMESweeper.  The next 
> version will be based on Transport Event Sinks which they 
> claim gives them a big performance boost.  The downside is it 
> will require Win2K
> - MMS from Tumbleweed Communications: they are MIMESweeper's 
> top competitor and this is the only product that has a 
> comparable feature set AFAIK. However, their support is 
> pretty much non-existent
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: randomfire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Virus/Spam filtering
> 
> 
> Trendmicro's products are the best out there for exchange. I 
> absolutely suggest you go with their product...
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Soysal, Serdar]

The hardware can be different.  You just need the same O/S and Exchange
level (version, sp etc).  The only thing that might go wrong in your case is
that the previous system had a multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be
single proc HAL.  

Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site name etc. etc.

See
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


Hello, 
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not
able to buy excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan
thunder k7). We want to restore uor server from backups to a different
machine whis is 1 proc, AMD Athlon. Is it possible to restore it to that
machine ? 

If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this scenario ? 

Thanks a lot for any advice 

Bye, Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: restore exchange to different hardware

[Martin Blackstone]

You should be able too.
The keys are having the same OS and SP, and the same Exch SP and hotfixes.
And read this
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp

-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: restore exchange to different hardware
Importance: High


Hello, 
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not
able to buy excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan
thunder k7). We want to restore uor server from backups to a different
machine whis is 1 proc, AMD Athlon. Is it possible to restore it to that
machine ? 

If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this scenario ? 

Thanks a lot for any advice 

Bye, Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus/Spam filtering

[Andrew Chan]

And that product sucks!!!  I just talked with their tech yesterday about
several questions I have, and even they admit that since it's a version
1.0 product, there are lots of bugs to be worked out.  I wouldn't
recommend it for production use any time soon...  

Andrew,
MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA


-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:00 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: Virus/Spam filtering
Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering


Symantec has recently upgraded their NAV for Exchange to also include
Content/Spam filtering as well, and have gone to a nice GUI for
management.  This is only good for E2K though, and they have not
announced any plans to port it to 5.5


hth,

Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering


The original question (that was violently snipped) asked about both
content and virus scanning (hence the subject line "Virus/Spam
filtering").  It is true that TrendMicro is very good on the virus
scanning side, its eManager plug-in is just a mediocre content filter.
For virus scanning, Sybari's Antigen is just as good.  You can't go
wrong with either product.  I believe Antigen has content filtering now
as well, but I haven't tested it yet.

For content filtering all of the three below are decent:
- MIMESweeper: they are the leader in this field.  Very strong product.
- Praetor: good/cheaper alternative to MIMESweeper.  The next version
will be based on Transport Event Sinks which they claim gives them a big
performance boost.  The downside is it will require Win2K
- MMS from Tumbleweed Communications: they are MIMESweeper's top
competitor and this is the only product that has a comparable feature
set AFAIK. However, their support is pretty much non-existent

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: randomfire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Virus/Spam filtering


Trendmicro's products are the best out there for exchange. I absolutely
suggest you go with their product...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

restore exchange to different hardware

[Jan Novák]

Hello, 
Last night our server crashed. We have all backups i think, but we are not able to buy 
excatly same HW configuration for new server (it was 2proc tyan thunder k7).
We want to restore uor server from backups to a different machine whis is 1 proc, AMD 
Athlon. Is it possible to restore it to that machine ? 

If yes can anyone point me to some documents describing this scenario ? 

Thanks a lot for any advice 

Bye, Honza Novak

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exch2k server move

[Soysal, Serdar]

He just likes the idea of pain.

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch2k server move


You lost me

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/
For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Pinquist
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exch2k server move


So we are going to do the big move to day, and naturally things are managing
to get complicated.  Can anyone tell me if there is a difference between
deactivating the original server, adding the new one to the proper security
group memberships to do a setup.exe /disasterrecovery and then restoring the
DBs, rather than doing a system state restore on the new machine off the
network, dropping the old machine, bringing the new one up on the network
and doing the setup /disasterrecovery?  An ms whitepaper recomended the
latter, while an ms tech recommended the former.  It seems to me it'd be
easier to leave the computer accounts and group membership the same...

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: POP Server

[Chris Scharff]

Dunno... PST files are inherently unstable, so I guess its possible.

> -Original Message-
> From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:11 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: POP Server
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> He has no rules setup and I checked his views too no help,
> But I created another PST folder and it worked .could be that 
> his PST folder was corrupted .but he was getting his mail 
> from another email account to that folder. Any thoughts? Thanks.
> 
> Bashir Malekzada
> AOptix Technologies , Inc.
> (408) 583 1130
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:21 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: POP Server
> 
> Check his views, rules, et al.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:21 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: POP Server
> > 
> > 
> > i have a user trying to get his mail thru POP3, the message
> > delivery keeps runing and the amount of unread messages keeps 
> > adding but he doesn't see any new messages in his mailbox.we 
> > checked thru outlook webaccess and also thru exchange he has 
> > a bunch of mail but he can't get it thru POP3 server, he is a 
> > frequent traveller he realy depend on POP server.and the size 
> > of his PST folder is also changing (adding DATA). any help is 
> > appreciated. Thanks. Bashir. 
> >
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exch2k server move

[Kevin Miller]

You lost me

--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Pinquist
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exch2k server move


So we are going to do the big move to day, and naturally things are
managing to get complicated.  Can anyone tell me if there is a
difference between deactivating the original server, adding the new one
to the proper security group memberships to do a setup.exe
/disasterrecovery and then restoring the DBs, rather than doing a system
state restore on the new machine off the network, dropping the old
machine, bringing the new one up on the network and doing the setup
/disasterrecovery?  An ms whitepaper recomended the latter, while an ms
tech recommended the former.  It seems to me it'd be easier to leave the
computer accounts and group membership the same...

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exch2k server move

[Chris Scharff]

The FAQ referenced in the bottom of e-mails sent to the list. Appendix A I
believe.

> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:43 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exch2k server move
> 
> 
> to which faq are you referring?  I haven't been able to find 
> anything other than the MS disaster recovery for exch2k white 
> paper outlining exactly how to bring up a recovery server.  
> i'm not doing a mailbox move... i'm moving the whole 
> godforsaken installation to another machine.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:23 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exch2k server move
> 
> 
> Why is the FAQ method not an option for moving?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:20 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Exch2k server move
> > 
> > 
> > So we are going to do the big move to day, and naturally
> > things are managing to get complicated.  Can anyone tell me 
> > if there is a difference between deactivating the original 
> > server, adding the new one to the proper security group 
> > memberships to do a setup.exe /disasterrecovery and then 
> > restoring the DBs, rather than doing a system state restore 
> > on the new machine off the network, dropping the old machine, 
> > bringing the new one up on the network and doing the setup 
> > /disasterrecovery?  An ms whitepaper recomended the latter, 
> > while an ms tech recommended the former.  It seems to me it'd 
> > be easier to leave the computer accounts and group membership 
> > the same...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: POP Server

[Bashir Malekzada]

Thanks,
He has no rules setup and I checked his views too no help,
But I created another PST folder and it worked .could be that his PST folder was 
corrupted .but he was getting his mail from another email account to that folder.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.

Bashir Malekzada
AOptix Technologies , Inc.
(408) 583 1130
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
From:   Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: POP Server

Check his views, rules, et al.

> -Original Message-
> From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: POP Server
> 
> 
> i have a user trying to get his mail thru POP3, the message 
> delivery keeps runing and the amount of unread messages keeps 
> adding but he doesn't see any new messages in his mailbox.we 
> checked thru outlook webaccess and also thru exchange he has 
> a bunch of mail but he can't get it thru POP3 server, he is a 
> frequent traveller he realy depend on POP server.and the size 
> of his PST folder is also changing (adding DATA). any help is 
> appreciated. Thanks. Bashir. 
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Virus/Spam filtering

[Chris H]

I concur. I update the content manager daily and it still only stops about
10% of our SPAM.
As well, there is a nifty little bug that wipes out your custom settings
every time you update the pattern file. Even with the fix from Trend it
still does it.

The rest of their products I am pretty happy with. They do seem a bit slow
at pushing out signatures for new virii IMHO though.

I saw a beta at MEC last year of their new all-in-one
Interscan/Scanmail/E-Content Manager software and it looked like a big
improvement.

"Beaten paths are for beaten men."
Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.


- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:13 AM
Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering


Mediocre might be too kind.

> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering
>
>
> The original question (that was violently snipped) asked
> about both content and virus scanning (hence the subject line
> "Virus/Spam filtering").  It is true that TrendMicro is very
> good on the virus scanning side, its eManager plug-in is just
> a mediocre content filter.

> -Original Message-
> From: randomfire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Virus/Spam filtering
>
>
> Trendmicro's products are the best out there for exchange. I
> absolutely suggest you go with their product...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exch2k server move

[Jeremy Pinquist]

to which faq are you referring?  I haven't been able to find anything other than the 
MS disaster recovery for exch2k white paper outlining exactly how to bring up a 
recovery server.  i'm not doing a mailbox move... i'm moving the whole godforsaken 
installation to another machine.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch2k server move


Why is the FAQ method not an option for moving?

> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exch2k server move
> 
> 
> So we are going to do the big move to day, and naturally 
> things are managing to get complicated.  Can anyone tell me 
> if there is a difference between deactivating the original 
> server, adding the new one to the proper security group 
> memberships to do a setup.exe /disasterrecovery and then 
> restoring the DBs, rather than doing a system state restore 
> on the new machine off the network, dropping the old machine, 
> bringing the new one up on the network and doing the setup 
> /disasterrecovery?  An ms whitepaper recomended the latter, 
> while an ms tech recommended the former.  It seems to me it'd 
> be easier to leave the computer accounts and group membership 
> the same...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?

[Jim Helfer]

  "ForeFront" ? Do you have a link?

   Jim Helfer



-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
r ead page checksum error -1018 ?


Wander?

Try a good general purpose hardware diag like ForeFront

And it was the guy beside me that threw it... I swear!

-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:33 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
r ead page checksum error -1018 ?


His name was Fred.

He gave me the same warnings about the -1018. Unfortunately "My hardware
vendor" is not one person. That machine is a generic Intel machine that
has been an Exchange server for years. It has an Adaptec 394x
controller, 512 MB or RAM, two pretty fast, name brand hard drives, etc.
As you know, that makes it worse as you don't know where to begin. Its
like an umpire at a MLB game getting beaned by a bottle of Bud...who in
the world threw it?

Arch

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
r ead page checksum error -1018 ?


People who bitch about Microsoft (PSS at least) are generally also the
same people who are incapable of formulating an intelligent technical
question. 

You ought to be on the phone with your hardware vendor at the moment as
well, your -1018 error is a hardware related issue, and you'll need some
parts swapage to keep this from happening again. Oh and take good
notes from the PSS feller and tell him we all say hi.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) 
> Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> 
> 
> I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone
> bitch#s about Microsoftthat guy could not have been 
> nicer. He confirmed my problem and is helping me get it fixed 
> as I type this.
> 
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
> 
> Arch
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:41 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
> Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> 
> 
> 1018 errors? Oh oh.
> I would call PSS. Dont wait on us.
> 
> 
> Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and
> main phone number have changed however we have not moved.
> 
> T. U. Parks Construction Company
> P.O. Box 3308
> Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
> Phone:423-648-3800
> 
> If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office
> personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone
number have changed however we have not moved.

T. U. Parks Construction Company
P.O. Box 3308
Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
Phone:423-648-3800

If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel,
contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exch2k server move

[Chris Scharff]

Why is the FAQ method not an option for moving?

> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exch2k server move
> 
> 
> So we are going to do the big move to day, and naturally 
> things are managing to get complicated.  Can anyone tell me 
> if there is a difference between deactivating the original 
> server, adding the new one to the proper security group 
> memberships to do a setup.exe /disasterrecovery and then 
> restoring the DBs, rather than doing a system state restore 
> on the new machine off the network, dropping the old machine, 
> bringing the new one up on the network and doing the setup 
> /disasterrecovery?  An ms whitepaper recomended the latter, 
> while an ms tech recommended the former.  It seems to me it'd 
> be easier to leave the computer accounts and group membership 
> the same...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: POP Server

[Chris Scharff]

Check his views, rules, et al.

> -Original Message-
> From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: POP Server
> 
> 
> i have a user trying to get his mail thru POP3, the message 
> delivery keeps runing and the amount of unread messages keeps 
> adding but he doesn't see any new messages in his mailbox.we 
> checked thru outlook webaccess and also thru exchange he has 
> a bunch of mail but he can't get it thru POP3 server, he is a 
> frequent traveller he realy depend on POP server.and the size 
> of his PST folder is also changing (adding DATA). any help is 
> appreciated. Thanks. Bashir. 
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exch2k server move

[Jeremy Pinquist]

So we are going to do the big move to day, and naturally things are managing to get 
complicated.  Can anyone tell me if there is a difference between deactivating the 
original server, adding the new one to the proper security group memberships to do a 
setup.exe /disasterrecovery and then restoring the DBs, rather than doing a system 
state restore on the new machine off the network, dropping the old machine, bringing 
the new one up on the network and doing the setup /disasterrecovery?  An ms whitepaper 
recomended the latter, while an ms tech recommended the former.  It seems to me it'd 
be easier to leave the computer accounts and group membership the same...

Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

POP Server

[Bashir Malekzada]

i have a user trying to get his mail thru POP3, the message delivery keeps
runing and the amount of unread messages keeps adding but he doesn't see
any new messages in his mailbox.we checked thru outlook webaccess and also
thru exchange he has a bunch of mail but he can't get it thru POP3 server,
he is a frequent traveller he realy depend on POP server.and the size of
his PST folder is also changing (adding DATA).
any help is appreciated.
Thanks.
Bashir. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus/Spam filtering

[Chris Scharff]

Mediocre might be too kind.

> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Virus/Spam filtering
> 
> 
> The original question (that was violently snipped) asked 
> about both content and virus scanning (hence the subject line 
> "Virus/Spam filtering").  It is true that TrendMicro is very 
> good on the virus scanning side, its eManager plug-in is just 
> a mediocre content filter. 

> -Original Message-
> From: randomfire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Virus/Spam filtering
> 
> 
> Trendmicro's products are the best out there for exchange. I 
> absolutely suggest you go with their product...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Klez in attached html

[Martin Blackstone]

I have found with Scanmail it passes the HTML, but not the attachment.

A couple of quesitons. What do you mean wrong information store version?
What version SM? What version and SP are Exchange.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Klez in attached html


I was unaware of HFNetcheck, I'm going to look at that now

I've taken that PC off the network, and will remove it from that office when
I get there tomorrow

Scanmail is already set up to scan the message body (in MAPI mode? AVAPI is
not available - wrong version of info store) and has successfully stopped
Klez in the past by recognising attachments

Should that attachment be reaching the Outlook client? Or is it a failure
with IE on the client

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 21 May 2002 16:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Klez in attached html


Run HFNetcheck on the WS. Make sure it has the appropriate patches.

Setup your Scanmail to do message body scanning as well as attachment.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 8:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Klez in attached html


Reason I said that Jim is that this all happens at the point an identically
named file is received as an attachment thru our Exch server to his Outlook
client

As far as I'm aware the machine is fully up to date, both the virus
definitions on the exchange server and the desktop AV software, and the
updates to both Windows and IE6 as reported by windowsupdate.microsoft.com

Is the fauly likely to be with scanmail failing to notice the virus
attachment, or a problem with the client

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 21 May 2002 15:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Klez in attached html


"...Officescan flags up that there is a file in the users temp internet
folder with Klez...  Why wouldn't scanmail be stopping this file? I havent
in the past considered that we should be blocking htm and html, but should
we?"

Stop and read what you just wrote Niki.  Why isn't adding *.htm and *.html
going to change a thing, if you add it to your e-mail scanning program?

I'll tell you why...because the "attempted" infection is not coming through
the e-mail system.  Someone is connecting to the Internet and either getting
this from an infected web site, or they are reading their private e-mail
through a web browser.  When this happens, the virus scanner on the desktop
catches the .exe file that is masquerading as an .html file and holds it in
the Temporary Internet Files folder, before it can execute.  Depending on
how you have your desktop AV configured, it will either quarantine the file
after the person is through visiting that page, or it will delete it
entirely.

If you want to stop this kind of behaviour, you need to institute an AV
Gateway for all your web traffic, as well as your e-mail traffic.  We use
NAV CE on all the servers and workstations, with the exception of the
Exchange servers, where we use NAV MSE.  We have Qmail on our Mail Relay
server connected to the Internet.  This does the initial subject type and
attachment type scanning.  We also use NAV AV Gateway software to scan web
traffic.

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Klez in attached html


I appreciate this is probably down to my misunderstanding of this virus, but
we have one user who is being sent an html file

As soon as the email is clicked on, the attachment is attempted to be opened
by Outlook. Then Officescan flags up that there is a file in the users temp
internet folder with Klez, and it is the same filename as the html
attachment, but the html has changed to exe

For instance, today he has an email with revisions1.html attached. When he
selects the email, it attempts to open the attachment, and Officescan
quarantines the file revisions1.exe from the temp internet folder.

I thought that Klez attachments had double extensions, like
revisions1.html.exe

Why wouldn't scanmail be stopping this file? I havent in the past considered
that we should be blocking htm and html, but should we?

I've checked this PC with Officescan and Symantecs tool, and it shows no
traces of Klez

Thanks

Nik

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: 

RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?

[Stephen Mynhier]

Also check file-level AV, NTFS compression, write-back caching, and
open-file managers... In case Fred didn't mention those

-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:33 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
r ead page checksum error -1018 ?


His name was Fred.

He gave me the same warnings about the -1018. Unfortunately "My hardware
vendor" is not one person. That machine is a generic Intel machine that
has been an Exchange server for years. It has an Adaptec 394x
controller, 512 MB or RAM, two pretty fast, name brand hard drives, etc.
As you know, that makes it worse as you don't know where to begin. Its
like an umpire at a MLB game getting beaned by a bottle of Bud...who in
the world threw it?

Arch

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) Synchronous
r ead page checksum error -1018 ?


People who bitch about Microsoft (PSS at least) are generally also the
same people who are incapable of formulating an intelligent technical
question. 

You ought to be on the phone with your hardware vendor at the moment as
well, your -1018 error is a hardware related issue, and you'll need some
parts swapage to keep this from happening again. Oh and take good
notes from the PSS feller and tell him we all say hi.

> -Original Message-
> From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196) 
> Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> 
> 
> I just got off the phone with them. I don't know why everyone
> bitch#s about Microsoftthat guy could not have been 
> nicer. He confirmed my problem and is helping me get it fixed 
> as I type this.
> 
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
> 
> Arch
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:41 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Hot to fix many errors like MSExchangeIS (3196)
> Synchronous r ead page checksum error -1018 ?
> 
> 
> 1018 errors? Oh oh.
> I would call PSS. Dont wait on us.
> 
> 
> Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and
> main phone number have changed however we have not moved.
> 
> T. U. Parks Construction Company
> P.O. Box 3308
> Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
> Phone:423-648-3800
> 
> If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office
> personnel, contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Please note T.U. Parks Construction's main office address and main phone
number have changed however we have not moved.

T. U. Parks Construction Company
P.O. Box 3308
Chattanooga, TN 37404-0308
Phone:423-648-3800

If you would like a list of direct dial numbers for office personnel,
contact Valerie Nico at (423) 648-3820, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]