RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
Sounds like new mail notification. Ask them to "trust" the new mail server. The port number is selected by outlook each time is is started. Outlook picks the next free port on the local machine. If the user wants a "specific" port, tell them it is specifically 1024-65535. They will also likely complain that new mail arrives slowly. P.S. Zonealarm will do the same thing. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. UDP ports 1923, 1068, 1087. Looks as if it might be random ports. We don't have DNS service enabled on the 2000 server. -Original Message- From: Mikko Pludra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Hi, sounds like a name resolving issue to me. check the blackice logs whether the traffic originates from UDP 53. My guess is that you have DNS running on your Windows2000 server, which you hadn't under NT. What's the point of running PFs in the net if you have a firewall protecting your network? are your users afraid of internal attacks? regards, Mikko Pludra -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are wondering why that is occurring. I thought maybe it's something to do with new mail notification, but I don't understand why it would not have occurred on the old systems. I should state that the old server is running NT 4.0 versus 2000 for the new box. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Are Deleted Items Logged?..etc
I guess my ISP hiccuped. Yes, your interpretation is accurate. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Are Deleted Items Logged?..etc Ed..thanks. SO I will read into this that...It is logged as you say in the transaction log...but in fact this is an exchange system log thus it is not say a "traditional log" in the sense that an administrator type could notlook through it and devire information about what was going on thanks bill P.S. I hope these only posted once as I only posted them once...But i see there been a few weird thing going with the e-mail otu part of the list. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Are Deleted Items Logged?..etc Of course it is logged in the transaction log, but I know of no way to make any use of that fact. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows & Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Are Deleted Items Logged?..etc Q: When a user delete's items in OL/Exch does the Exchange system log this action? Does it log that fact that a user would then empty the deleted items? Does it log the fact that the items where recovered from the retention? What log's might I look at for this info? Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a Yes..issue in management... thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
On Sat September 21 2002 13:19, Julian Stone wrote: > I'm not too sure where you got that info from, as I'm running it quite > happily on a standard server, and yes I've done the training course, and > are an M$ gold partner. > > Yours, > > Julian Stone > from MS themselves.. Installing and Exploring Microsoft Metadirectory Services published March 2002 as part of course #2062a :- Implementing Microsoft Metadirectory services. > -Original Message- > From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 September 2002 10:44 am > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> Sent: 20 September 2002 19:43 pm > >> To: Exchange Discussions > >> Subject: RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory > >> > >> I think you have to sign some kind of pact with Microsoft in order to > >> > >> get your hands on Metadirectory Services. That's what I read on the > >> MMS website. > > > >On Fri September 20 2002 21:24, Julian Stone wrote: > > It's a free product, but you must be trained in it's use, otherwise > >you can cause havoc or even worse... > > > > Yours, > > > > Julian Stone > > Given that it requires Advanced Server or Datacenter to run on, you have > an > interesting definition of free. > > so long as you engage MCS or other qualified partner Microsoft will let > you > have MMS for nothing :-) > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: It all started with a lie - Q313819
Have you ever used the bulkaddfromexcel script? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 PM Subject: RE: It all started with a lie - Q313819 I think I used LDIFDE to create mail-enabled user accounts... I haven't heard complaints from them but I am not sure if they are using PFs. I also have created a lot of users with CSVDE and everything seems to be OK there. Actually CSVDE is my preferred method for CREATING users and I have created way more users with CSVDE than LDIFDE. At least CSVDE uses CSV files that are easy to parse and manipulate. I mostly user LDIFDE to MODIFY existing users. LDIFDE really sucks IMO. Every time I need to create an LDIFDE text file, I have to use Search and Replace function of Microsoft Word. I'd say it made me an export in MSWord search and replace. :) -Original Message- From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: It all started with a lie - Q313819 So, I write this to test the waters and see how others have managed this issue - For many years, going back to 4.0, we used CSV files to create/manage/delete mailboxes within Exchange and this worked well. Then comes along Exchange 2000, which with it's integration of Active Directory and the requirement to use LDIFDE. Ok, no problem I can learn new tools and I learn the silly new LDIF import format and I make it do what I want it to do - mailbox enable an existing AD account. All is well until a few weeks following the mailbox enabling of the accounts, our users discover access to public folders (along with free/busy, off-line address book, etc) can not be had. A call to Microsoft produces the answer that, the attribute of msExchUserAccountControl had not been properly populated into AD. Microsoft writes a script for us that uses CDOEXM to re-set the permissions and while this does resolve the problem for existing users it doesn't resolve the on-going problems. So, Microsoft transferred me between a few groups (it's hard I guess to know what is what when you've got half of your mail system managed by another non-communicative group - Active Directory support) where I landed with an LDIFDE support engineer. This engineer then proceeded to explain that it was not possible to create mailbox enabled AD accounts with LDIFDE and pointed me to an article Q324353 [XADM: Users Cannot Access Public Folders or Delegate Mailboxes on a Separate Server] which states: "If you want to use LDIFDE/ADSI to create users, Microsoft recommends that you use LDIFDE/ADSI to create only the user accounts, and then use Active Directory Users and Computers to create the mailboxes." to which I replied that Microsoft does support it and the answer can be found in Q313819 - [HOW TO: Create Mailbox-Enabled Account Using LDIFDE in Exchange 2000 Server] and after a bit of discussion Microsoft decided that it really "sucks". It all seems to boil down to the fact that no one knows how the encoding of msExchUserAccountControl is done (in PSS that is) and without the ability to set that attribute at creation time, the RUS does not properly setup the account and Microsoft has no intentions to support this, even with the Q article on how to do it. So, my question? Simple - has anyone managed to use LDIFDE to create and mailbox enable or just to mailbox enable an existing account in AD and had it work properly, namely the use of public folders? I don't know about others that have a long history with Exchange but, do some of you feel that Exchange has made some real steps "backward" from the functionality that Exchange 5.5 had? And a word of warning to those still on 5.5 - if it aint' broken, don't "fix" it. Thanks, david moore Chevron Phillips Chemical _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MEC
Ditto ... I would love to hear CJs explanation about the differences between OL97/98/2000 again. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 4:33 PM Subject: RE: MEC > Cthulhu at DisneyLand? I would pay to see that. > > > -Original Message- > From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 10:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MEC > > > Stars ain't right this year. Nope. > > (:= > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin > Blackstone > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 8:47 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MEC > > > What about you CJ? You gonna make it or not? > > -Original Message- > From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 6:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MEC > > > You're awful young to be subbed to this list, little boy! > > (:= > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 7:48 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MEC > > > Me three. > > -Original Message- > From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:04 PM > Posted To: List - Exchange Server List > Conversation: MEC > Subject: RE: MEC > > > Me To! > > -Original Message- > From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:47 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MEC > > > I'll be there! > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MEC > > > OK, the time draws near. > Who is going? > > > > Martin Blackstone > Director, Information Technologies > Superior Access Insurance Services > 949.470.2111 x279 > > -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head > out when you're coming home his face might burn up. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
RE: Exmerge fails on import
Yes I did.
I have gotten it to work. I was thinking it could have been permission issues,
so I checked the properties of the PST. The group "Everybody" had full
permissons, but just for laughs I added the Administrators and gave them full
permissions. Then it worked. I've logged into the mailbox with Outlook,
everything seems to be there and the log file checks out OK.
AW
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
> Did you configure a mapi profile in Outlook prior to running exmerge?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 3:30 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
> >
> >
> > Oh great I already installed it before I read this.
> >
> > Also, I tried to Exmerge again and it failed.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
> > > Its true for E2k as well. Theres a Technet article floating around
> > > somewhere about it. It can be done but YMMV.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:17 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
> > >
> > >
> > > I seem to remember for exch55 that installing any version
> > of OL on the
> > > exch server = BAD...unless if you really had too... you
> > installed OL
> > > first then installed exch..
> > >
> > > It was something about OL over writting the mapi32.dll? of the exch
> > > server with the OL version or something like that.
> > >
> > > 2 cents
> > > bill
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:02 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
> > >
> > >
> > > Outlook Express...
> > >
> > > OK Now I am thinking I might need Outlook 2000? Wasn't
> > there a thread
> > > in this list a week or so ago which discussed not
> > installing Outlook
> > > onto the Exchange
> > > server itself? Or am I dreaming things?
> > >
> > > So if I install OL 2000 you reckon it will work?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
> > > > What version of Outlook is installed on the box doing the import?
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:23 PM
> > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No, I just checked and the PSTs are not read-only.
> > > > >
> > > > > AW
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
> > > > > > Does the cause related in Q323671 apply anyway?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > > From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:17 PM
> > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No -- Just one 2000 server to another. Both are
> > Windows 2000
> > > > > > > servers, however the server I exported from is at
> > SP2, and the
> > > > > > > new server which the imports are failing is at SP3.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AW
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > wouldn't happen to be moving from E55 to E2K would you?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Q323671
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > > > From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:30 PM
> > > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > > > > Subject: Exmerge fails on import
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am using Exmerge for the first time with Exchange 2000.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I exported some mailboxes to PSTs and copied the
> > files to my
> > > > > > > > new server. On the new server, I run exmerge and try to
> > > > > > > > import
> > > > > > > them (into
> > > > > > > > new mailboxes that
> > > > > > > > have not yet been logged in to). However, I get some
> > > > > > > errors. Below is
> > > > > > > > from the
> > > > > > > > log file that was generated.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [19:10:45] Mailbox has never been logged into.
> > Using default
> > > > > > > > locale
> > > > > > > > [19:10:45] Using locale 0x407 and code page 1252
> > to connect
> > > > > > > to mailbox
> > > > > > > > [19:10:45] Merging data from file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\DS.PST'
> > > > > > > to mailbox
> > > > > > > > 'Dieter Schmieter' ('DS') on server 'EXCHANGE'.
> > > > > [19:10:45] DN of
> > > > > > > > object is'/o=CompanyName/ou=Erste administrative
> > > > > > > > Gruppe/cn=Recipients/cn=ds'. [19:10:45]En
RE: MEC
Cthulhu at DisneyLand? I would pay to see that. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Stars ain't right this year. Nope. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC What about you CJ? You gonna make it or not? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 6:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC You're awful young to be subbed to this list, little boy! (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Me three. -Original Message- From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:04 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Me To! -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I'll be there! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC OK, the time draws near. Who is going? Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Stars ain't right this year. Nope. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC What about you CJ? You gonna make it or not? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 6:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC You're awful young to be subbed to this list, little boy! (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Me three. -Original Message- From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:04 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Me To! -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I'll be there! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC OK, the time draws near. Who is going? Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
I was told by MS that it was free but I had to hire Microsoft Consulting Services in order to use it. I need to sync several databases including AD and it sounded like a good way of doing it. Unfortunately, the salesperson from MS I talked to wanted to turn it in to some huge project including a reporting module and something to do with BizTalk - it sounded extremely expensive. Luckily she never called back. We are now thinking about hiring a full time programmer to tackle this and several other little projects we have. Jeff Hague -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory I'm not too sure where you got that info from, as I'm running it quite happily on a standard server, and yes I've done the training course, and are an M$ gold partner. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 September 2002 10:44 am To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 20 September 2002 19:43 pm >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory >> I think you have to sign some kind of pact with Microsoft in order to >> get your hands on Metadirectory Services. That's what I read on the >> MMS website. >On Fri September 20 2002 21:24, Julian Stone wrote: > It's a free product, but you must be trained in it's use, otherwise >you can cause havoc or even worse... > Yours, > Julian Stone Given that it requires Advanced Server or Datacenter to run on, you have an interesting definition of free. so long as you engage MCS or other qualified partner Microsoft will let you have MMS for nothing :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
What about you CJ? You gonna make it or not? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 6:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC You're awful young to be subbed to this list, little boy! (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Me three. -Original Message- From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:04 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Me To! -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I'll be there! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC OK, the time draws near. Who is going? Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
You're awful young to be subbed to this list, little boy! (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Me three. -Original Message- From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:04 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Me To! -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I'll be there! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC OK, the time draws near. Who is going? Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Me three. -Original Message- From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:04 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Me To! -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I'll be there! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC OK, the time draws near. Who is going? Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers
I should have been more specific. Im not sure if it will work with any Custom Recipient i.e. the delivery receipt from an external user showing the internal Exchange display name. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 9:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers Would that work with a Blackberry? I never tried that... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 21:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers Im not sure if that would work with a pager. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers If it's hidden you can send it a message with delivery receipt. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows & Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Murray-Smith Tony CF CH Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers It's great that it worked for you Robert. The only limitation with this approach is if the mailbox associated with the SMTP address is hidden or deleted (tombstoned). In such cases the "Alt K" would not find a match. In this case an ldap query would be the better approach. A good utility to run ldap queries is LDP.EXE, a support tool that comes with Windows 2000 Server. It is necessary to bind in Admin mode when searching for hidden or deleted objects. The following article provides information on how to do this. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q196850&; Tony -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 17. September 2002 14:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers Holy easy. That worked great. Thanks ma'am. Robert -Original Message- From: Judi McLane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Custom Recipient / Pagers Enter it into a new mail message and let the name resolve or hit and it will resolve to the owner. Judi McLane -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Custom Recipient / Pagers We have 500 pagers setup as "custom recipients" on our Exchange 5.5 server. When trying to add a new custom recipient for a particular pager, I receive an error message that the address already exist. Is there any way to do a search on SMTP addresses, so I can find out who is using this address, or do I have to manually click on all 500 custom recipients until I find the correct one? Mercy, please say it isn't so. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Vero
RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
I'm not too sure where you got that info from, as I'm running it quite happily on a standard server, and yes I've done the training course, and are an M$ gold partner. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 September 2002 10:44 am To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 20 September 2002 19:43 pm >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory >> I think you have to sign some kind of pact with Microsoft in order to >> get your hands on Metadirectory Services. That's what I read on the >> MMS website. >On Fri September 20 2002 21:24, Julian Stone wrote: > It's a free product, but you must be trained in it's use, otherwise >you can cause havoc or even worse... > Yours, > Julian Stone Given that it requires Advanced Server or Datacenter to run on, you have an interesting definition of free. so long as you engage MCS or other qualified partner Microsoft will let you have MMS for nothing :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
>> -Original Message- >> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 20 September 2002 19:43 pm >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory >> I think you have to sign some kind of pact with Microsoft in order to >> get your hands on Metadirectory Services. That's what I read on the MMS >> website. >On Fri September 20 2002 21:24, Julian Stone wrote: > It's a free product, but you must be trained in it's use, otherwise you > can cause havoc or even worse... > Yours, > Julian Stone Given that it requires Advanced Server or Datacenter to run on, you have an interesting definition of free. so long as you engage MCS or other qualified partner Microsoft will let you have MMS for nothing :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
