RE: Open Exchange server
It is a competing product. There are lots of them. SuSE Linux is a pretty good distribution. It has been around awhile. Oracle9i is pretty good... William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Exchange server Saw this product announced today: http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/suse_business/openexchange/ So what are peoples opinions on this. Haven't there been other exchange replacements in the past that tried and failed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled offline defrags?
It doesn't even have to be after moving lots of mailboxes. Taking your server offline for this is totally unnecessary as a maintenance step. Performance and Tuning Tip: Defragmenting Exchange 2000 Server Databases http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/tips/defragmentation.asp Support WebCast: Microsoft Exchange: Offline Defragmentation with the Eseutil Utility http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/servicedesks/webcasts/wc 060402/wcblurb060402.asp William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled offline defrags? Does anyone perform regular offline defrags of your Exchange 2000 database(s)? I've heard/read conflicting reports about this; I know people that like to do it on a quarterly basis, and I also know people that say it should only performed after a large amount of mailbox moves or deletions. I could swear that I've seen an MS Q article that said not to perform offline defrags just for the sake of doing it, to only do it after a large amount of moves or deletions, but for the life of me I can't find that article now. Does anyone know the article I'm talking about, or have links to any other resources that discuss this topic? Thanks Jason Clishe Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Business: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled offline defrags?
I was asked that at the Boston MEC in 98 onstage. Up there with me was Joseph Pagano, author of the Disaster Recovery Whitepaper, and Laurion Burchall, the developer for the JET database. I handed the question over to Laurion and he said it's only necessary if you have deleted a lot of data and want to recover the white space. Same applies to 2K. -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:JClishe;sequoianet.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled offline defrags? Does anyone perform regular offline defrags of your Exchange 2000 database(s)? I've heard/read conflicting reports about this; I know people that like to do it on a quarterly basis, and I also know people that say it should only performed after a large amount of mailbox moves or deletions. I could swear that I've seen an MS Q article that said not to perform offline defrags just for the sake of doing it, to only do it after a large amount of moves or deletions, but for the life of me I can't find that article now. Does anyone know the article I'm talking about, or have links to any other resources that discuss this topic? Thanks Jason Clishe Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Business: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why is this coming up???
An understanding of how SMTP works would tell you that the machine responsible for receiving mail for vtext.com (208.220.171.140) claims to have a problem with the sender's address. 99.9% of the time this is because the pointer record for your mail outbound mail server is not resolved by the receiving machine. -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:davidm;imcu.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why is this coming up??? A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 553 Could not parse sender address The message that caused this notification was: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Open Exchange server
Saw this product announced today: http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/suse_business/openexchange/ So what are peoples opinions on this. Haven't there been other exchange replacements in the past that tried and failed? Don't think one should talk about exchange replacements. Without looking at the page I bet it's a product running on Linux. Also.. there are other, competing products which provide almost the same functionality as Exchange does. If you're looking for a Linux based replacement for M$ products including Exchange then you might want to search for bill's server. Not sure if it can replace M$ Exchange completely. Downloaded it some time ago.. still have to install it.. Have fun, B. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Reporting Tool
Hmmm... Sounds like a decent project, and doable. Lemme see what I can come up with. -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley;bankofamerica.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Reporting Tool Does anyone know of any good PF reporting tools? I would like to be able to put the hierarchy into a text file and then add things like number of sub folders and such. Maybe a way to get ftreeinf.exe to put information into a text file? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why is this coming up???
Ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why is this coming up??? A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 553 Could not parse sender address The message that caused this notification was: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled offline defrags?
Thanks for the responses. For what it's worth, I found the Q article that I mentioned earlier that actually recommends against performing an offline defrag unless you really need to. Its at: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q186291 Jason -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled offline defrags? I was asked that at the Boston MEC in 98 onstage. Up there with me was Joseph Pagano, author of the Disaster Recovery Whitepaper, and Laurion Burchall, the developer for the JET database. I handed the question over to Laurion and he said it's only necessary if you have deleted a lot of data and want to recover the white space. Same applies to 2K. -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:JClishe;sequoianet.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled offline defrags? Does anyone perform regular offline defrags of your Exchange 2000 database(s)? I've heard/read conflicting reports about this; I know people that like to do it on a quarterly basis, and I also know people that say it should only performed after a large amount of mailbox moves or deletions. I could swear that I've seen an MS Q article that said not to perform offline defrags just for the sake of doing it, to only do it after a large amount of moves or deletions, but for the life of me I can't find that article now. Does anyone know the article I'm talking about, or have links to any other resources that discuss this topic? Thanks Jason Clishe Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Business: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone
True. Outlook in MAPI mode does not poll for messages. Outlook in any other mode does poll (per the relevant protocol). -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Unless you're using POP or IMAP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 4:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone OL in Exchange mode does not poll. The server pushes. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone I wonder if some how Outlook is constantly polling the Email server for new messages. Not sure of where in Reg to look but maybe it is set to some really low number and that is causing the delays. Just a guess. - Original Message - From: James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:30 AM Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone How about doing a repair of office, or uninstalling and reinstalling? Also see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q241425 And http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q255259 For starters . . . James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone I deleted the Profiles and set up new ones and the problem is still there Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone How about recreating the Outlook profiles in question? -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hopefully Andy will see this too Ok I have checked the machines in Question... 1. CPU jumps pretty High and stays there when doing anything in Outlook related 2. This problem seems to be just with a few people and not everyone 3. There is no Excessive Memory usage and besides what I mention above CPU seems ok 4. I have set all Nics to be 100/full on both the server and workstations 5. I have turned off Virus Scanner 6. I have Defragged Hard Drives 7. I have Sacrificed a Chicken to appease the Gods (I was unable to find a Virgin) I'm just not sure what else to look at End Users who have the problem are running Windows XP Pro with Office 2000, but so is everyone else. Any other Ideas? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone What have you done to fix it? What's changed lately? Has it always done this? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hello all, here is my issue, I have several users who are experiencing extreme slow downs with exchange, like 20 seconds to open an e-mail without an attachment. Currently everyone is running Windows XP and Office 2000 Server is Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running on a Windows 2000 Server with SP3 Its got me stumped because some people do not have any problems... Any Help Appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Senior Network Engineer Phone: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Cell: (864) 449-9912 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info The greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we
RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone
To be more correct, the server does not really push either. The server sends a UDP frame to the client telling it that it's time to refresh the view and show a new message. But they still call this process polling. In fact if Outlook is behind a firewall that blocks UDP frames, Outlook will never receive a new message notification from the server and will never refresh its view. For these occasions, there is an article on MS support website that describes how to adjust Outlook's polling intervals so that it would not even have to wait for the server's new mail notification UDP frame. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone OL in Exchange mode does not poll. The server pushes. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone I wonder if some how Outlook is constantly polling the Email server for new messages. Not sure of where in Reg to look but maybe it is set to some really low number and that is causing the delays. Just a guess. - Original Message - From: James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:30 AM Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone How about doing a repair of office, or uninstalling and reinstalling? Also see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q241425 And http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q255259 For starters . . . James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone I deleted the Profiles and set up new ones and the problem is still there Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone How about recreating the Outlook profiles in question? -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hopefully Andy will see this too Ok I have checked the machines in Question... 1. CPU jumps pretty High and stays there when doing anything in Outlook related 2. This problem seems to be just with a few people and not everyone 3. There is no Excessive Memory usage and besides what I mention above CPU seems ok 4. I have set all Nics to be 100/full on both the server and workstations 5. I have turned off Virus Scanner 6. I have Defragged Hard Drives 7. I have Sacrificed a Chicken to appease the Gods (I was unable to find a Virgin) I'm just not sure what else to look at End Users who have the problem are running Windows XP Pro with Office 2000, but so is everyone else. Any other Ideas? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone What have you done to fix it? What's changed lately? Has it always done this? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hello all, here is my issue, I have several users who are experiencing extreme slow downs with exchange, like 20 seconds to open an e-mail without an attachment. Currently everyone is running Windows XP and Office 2000 Server is Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running on a Windows 2000 Server with SP3 Its got me stumped because some people do not have any problems... Any Help Appreciated, Joshua Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Senior Network Engineer Phone: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Cell: (864) 449-9912 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info The greatest
RE: Outlook startup - fast when profile is new, slow after that
Let me get back to you on WINS. I will test a few things on Monday in that respect. However, I am using HOSTS file on both clients to resolve the Exchange server's IP address. Client #1 connects immediately when creating new profile and checking the mailbox name. All subsequent connections are slow. Client #2 always connects fast. Both clients have Outlook 2000 but different builds. Client #1 has all the latest Outlook upgrades. I can see that Client #1 caches the Exchange server's name in the registry as if it were a domain controller (key dca740c8c042101ab4b908002b2fe182). Client #2 does not cache the Exchange server's name in this key. So I thought that this was a problem with different builds of Outlook 2000. I did not check to see if WINS client was enabled on both machines. To think of it, it is most likely enabled on Client #1, I will need to check on Monday. Maybe you are right, maybe WINS is interfering with name resolution on Client #1. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook startup - fast when profile is new, slow after that The first place I would look is DNS and WINS name resolution. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook startup - fast when profile is new, slow after that Hi all. I am chasing something that is causing Outlook to perform poorly. Can't quite figure it out. The environment: Exchange 2000 server. Outlook 2000. AD Domain controllers are not accessible to the clients, only the Exchange server can talk to the domain controllers. Exchange server is configured to not use RFR, all Outlooks are forced to use NSPI proxy. All the client PCs have an entry in their HOSTS file for the name and IP address of the Exchange server. When I create an Outlook profile from scratch and use it for the first time, Outlook starts immediately. However all the subsequent start-ups are slow. I always get a pop-up saying that the Exchange server is not available, Retry or Work offline. After I hit Retry, it connects fine. I have noticed that after the first connection, a key is created in the registry: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows Messaging Subsystem\Profiles\jkelly02\dca740c8c042101ab4b908002b2fe182 And it has string value 001e6602=exchange_server_name Now I have another PC with an earlier version of Outlook 2000 installed on it. That PC does not experience such problems. It always connects on the first try. I also noticed that the dca740c8c042101ab4b908002b2fe182 key exists on that PC but does not have any values. Is this an Outlook problem? Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Automatic Rules ?
Wow, I just glanced at the subject and thought it was Automatic Rifles :) -Original Message- From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:Daniel.Bourque;loto-quebec.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE : Automatic Rules ? What about enabling journaling of your Internet connector to deliver to a mailbox and run an Event script there? -Message d'origine- De : Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Envoyé : 25 octobre, 2002 07:15 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : RE: Automatic Rules ? I have done this for incoming mail, but I do not know any way to do this for outgoing email. Maybe a content filtering package could do this, but I am not 100% sure. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Simon Ward Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 04:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Automatic Rules ? Hi there, I've had a look through the archives, but can't find anything relevant. I'd like to apply a rule on all outgoing and incoming email for our sales force which copies any mail sent to [anyuser]@[specific domain] into a public folder for client communications. I thought that a server or client based rule would be a good way to go about this, but I can't find any information relating to creating rules for users without going in and manually setting them up. Can anyone come up with some suggestions ? Thanks, Simon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Groups
It is probably possible by manipulating Active Directory via ADSI -Original Message- From: Chris Childers [mailto:chrischilders33;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Admin Groups Is there anyway to script the creation of Admin and Routing Groups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why is this coming up???
Thanks everyone. I will look into all three areas. I send to three different web enabled phones and of the three this is the only one that complains this way. The other two messaging.nextel.com and mobile.att.net receive their messages just fine. I just wanted to make sure my exchange was setup correctly. Thanks again. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 10:55 AM Subject: RE: Why is this coming up??? Ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why is this coming up??? A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 553 Could not parse sender address The message that caused this notification was: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook startup - fast when profile is new, slow after that
Are both clients also using LMHOSTS files then? Make one and see what happens. But fixing DNS and WINS is better. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook startup - fast when profile is new, slow after that Let me get back to you on WINS. I will test a few things on Monday in that respect. However, I am using HOSTS file on both clients to resolve the Exchange server's IP address. Client #1 connects immediately when creating new profile and checking the mailbox name. All subsequent connections are slow. Client #2 always connects fast. Both clients have Outlook 2000 but different builds. Client #1 has all the latest Outlook upgrades. I can see that Client #1 caches the Exchange server's name in the registry as if it were a domain controller (key dca740c8c042101ab4b908002b2fe182). Client #2 does not cache the Exchange server's name in this key. So I thought that this was a problem with different builds of Outlook 2000. I did not check to see if WINS client was enabled on both machines. To think of it, it is most likely enabled on Client #1, I will need to check on Monday. Maybe you are right, maybe WINS is interfering with name resolution on Client #1. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook startup - fast when profile is new, slow after that The first place I would look is DNS and WINS name resolution. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook startup - fast when profile is new, slow after that Hi all. I am chasing something that is causing Outlook to perform poorly. Can't quite figure it out. The environment: Exchange 2000 server. Outlook 2000. AD Domain controllers are not accessible to the clients, only the Exchange server can talk to the domain controllers. Exchange server is configured to not use RFR, all Outlooks are forced to use NSPI proxy. All the client PCs have an entry in their HOSTS file for the name and IP address of the Exchange server. When I create an Outlook profile from scratch and use it for the first time, Outlook starts immediately. However all the subsequent start-ups are slow. I always get a pop-up saying that the Exchange server is not available, Retry or Work offline. After I hit Retry, it connects fine. I have noticed that after the first connection, a key is created in the registry: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows Messaging Subsystem\Profiles\jkelly02\dca740c8c042101ab4b908002b2fe182 And it has string value 001e6602=exchange_server_name Now I have another PC with an earlier version of Outlook 2000 installed on it. That PC does not experience such problems. It always connects on the first try. I also noticed that the dca740c8c042101ab4b908002b2fe182 key exists on that PC but does not have any values. Is this an Outlook problem? Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Groups
I would think it's more likely you'd have to use CDOEXM. But I don't know for sure. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Groups It is probably possible by manipulating Active Directory via ADSI -Original Message- From: Chris Childers [mailto:chrischilders33;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Admin Groups Is there anyway to script the creation of Admin and Routing Groups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why is this coming up???
I tried to telnet into their SMTP server using port 25 and I was rejected at the MAIL FROM: command. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Why is this coming up??? Thanks everyone. I will look into all three areas. I send to three different web enabled phones and of the three this is the only one that complains this way. The other two messaging.nextel.com and mobile.att.net receive their messages just fine. I just wanted to make sure my exchange was setup correctly. Thanks again. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 10:55 AM Subject: RE: Why is this coming up??? Ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why is this coming up??? A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 553 Could not parse sender address The message that caused this notification was: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Admin Groups
I know that the SDK has a piece of vbs that will create stores (mailbox and PF).. you might take a look there. (I used that code to write a perl script to mount/dismount dbs for me)... the file I used was called 'createstore.vbs' ttp://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/ _esdk_samples_createstore_navigating.asp jeff e. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Groups I would think it's more likely you'd have to use CDOEXM. But I don't know for sure. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Admin Groups It is probably possible by manipulating Active Directory via ADSI -Original Message- From: Chris Childers [mailto:chrischilders33;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Admin Groups Is there anyway to script the creation of Admin and Routing Groups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
