Display Public Contact Folder Record's Owner
I am running Exchange 2000 SP3 with Outlook 2000 clients. I have set up a public folder for a departments contacts, with the exchange permissions so that all department members can see all records, all can add records but they can only edit and delete the records they own. My problem is that I can not figure out how to display which department member 'owns' each contact record. I want to display this to minimize confusion when someone tries to change or delete a contact record and can not Thank you for any assistance in this area Sam Todd SPT Systems Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: List for Thin Client
http://www.thethin.net/ --- Andy Haigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering is anyone new of a good Windows 2000 > Terminal Server > discussion list > > Thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: List for Thin Client
I was wondering is anyone new of a good Windows 2000 Terminal Server discussion list Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: looking for good Oracle list
Tsk tsk... running Oracle on Windows... Is there no shame? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Precht Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Orin Rehorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have a recommendation for an Oracle list? > > Regards, > Orin > > Orin Rehorst > Port of Houston Authority > (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: (713)670-2443 > Fax: (713)670-2457 > TOPAS web site: > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: looking for good Oracle list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Orin Rehorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have a recommendation for an Oracle list? > > Regards, > Orin > > Orin Rehorst > Port of Houston Authority > (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: (713)670-2443 > Fax: (713)670-2457 > TOPAS web site: > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Non-delivery puzzle
Oh - I forgot to add: I've already got a call in to HP Gold Support (sort of like MS Premier support, but cheaper and not as fast). They're digging through my message logs and coming back with some suggestions, but I thought it worthwhile to add a couple more brains to the problem. Darcy -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Non-delivery puzzle Environment: Exchange 5.5, sp4 with hotfixes. NT4 domain, some boxes NT4, some W2K Single organization, multiple sites, multiple servers in Seattle site X400 connections between sites Objects involved: mailboxes in Seattle and distribution lists in multiple sites. Remote distribution lists are expanded locally Client: Outlook 2000 Here's the procedure: Bridget sends out a message from "Internal Communications" (IC). IC is a mailbox on one of the Seattle servers. Bridget has full owner access to the IC mailbox, and has added it to her regular Outlook profile. She sends out a weekly newsletter to all of our offices (global company, so this goes to multiple Exchange sites and uses multiple DL's to get there) from her mailbox. She uses the "From" box to set the message as coming from IC, includes a delivery receipt, then sends out the message. Each location gets it's own newsletter, so several messages are sent. Two examples - one cross-site, one intra-site: ***Cross Site*** Users in LA did not receive their newsletter last Friday (LA was not the only site that failed, used here as an example). Careful examination of the message logs showed the message traveling through the appropriate connectors and being passed off to the MTA in LA. Along the way there is an "Internal Report Generated" event in the log. When I opened the properties, it would show a list of names and the words "not delivered". No NDR came back through to Bridget (the original sender), nor to the IC mailbox. I had Bridget repeat the mailing, using a profile connecting directly to the IC mailbox and thus bypassing use of the "From" field. The same result followed. I then set a profile on my own workstation to the IC mailbox and tried one last time (to be certain of the time-stamp), and was at first unsuccessful. A later attempt was successful. Bridget has had a similar experience: what works just fine one time, does not work the next. No changes have been made to the Exchange servers between attempts. Mail flow between the two sites has not been interrupted at any point in this. We started including delivery receipts on all messages, but only successful deliveries have been reported. The failures are not being returned in any form. Only the message tracking log shows the failures. About an hour ago, I turned off "Expand remote DL's locally" on all of the Seattle servers. Messages were sent to several out-of-site DL's and all were delivered successfully. This *may* mean the cross-site problem is fixed, or may not - the issue has not been consistent - not all sendings to cross site DL's using the procedures described above were failing. ***Intra-site*** In another example, Bridget used the same procedure as above (her profile but "from" IC) to send a message to a list of users in Seattle. Bridget's mailbox and the IC mailbox are both in Seattle, as is the DL used to send the message. The message is normally delivered to all users. Sometimes, such as last Friday, the message is delivered *only* to users on the same server as Bridget and the IC mailbox. As above, no NDR's were ever returned. Only the message tracking log shows the failures. Ideas??? Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images 601 N. 34th Street Seattle, WA 98103 Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.c
Non-delivery puzzle
Environment: Exchange 5.5, sp4 with hotfixes. NT4 domain, some boxes NT4, some W2K Single organization, multiple sites, multiple servers in Seattle site X400 connections between sites Objects involved: mailboxes in Seattle and distribution lists in multiple sites. Remote distribution lists are expanded locally Client: Outlook 2000 Here's the procedure: Bridget sends out a message from "Internal Communications" (IC). IC is a mailbox on one of the Seattle servers. Bridget has full owner access to the IC mailbox, and has added it to her regular Outlook profile. She sends out a weekly newsletter to all of our offices (global company, so this goes to multiple Exchange sites and uses multiple DL's to get there) from her mailbox. She uses the "From" box to set the message as coming from IC, includes a delivery receipt, then sends out the message. Each location gets it's own newsletter, so several messages are sent. Two examples - one cross-site, one intra-site: ***Cross Site*** Users in LA did not receive their newsletter last Friday (LA was not the only site that failed, used here as an example). Careful examination of the message logs showed the message traveling through the appropriate connectors and being passed off to the MTA in LA. Along the way there is an "Internal Report Generated" event in the log. When I opened the properties, it would show a list of names and the words "not delivered". No NDR came back through to Bridget (the original sender), nor to the IC mailbox. I had Bridget repeat the mailing, using a profile connecting directly to the IC mailbox and thus bypassing use of the "From" field. The same result followed. I then set a profile on my own workstation to the IC mailbox and tried one last time (to be certain of the time-stamp), and was at first unsuccessful. A later attempt was successful. Bridget has had a similar experience: what works just fine one time, does not work the next. No changes have been made to the Exchange servers between attempts. Mail flow between the two sites has not been interrupted at any point in this. We started including delivery receipts on all messages, but only successful deliveries have been reported. The failures are not being returned in any form. Only the message tracking log shows the failures. About an hour ago, I turned off "Expand remote DL's locally" on all of the Seattle servers. Messages were sent to several out-of-site DL's and all were delivered successfully. This *may* mean the cross-site problem is fixed, or may not - the issue has not been consistent - not all sendings to cross site DL's using the procedures described above were failing. ***Intra-site*** In another example, Bridget used the same procedure as above (her profile but "from" IC) to send a message to a list of users in Seattle. Bridget's mailbox and the IC mailbox are both in Seattle, as is the DL used to send the message. The message is normally delivered to all users. Sometimes, such as last Friday, the message is delivered *only* to users on the same server as Bridget and the IC mailbox. As above, no NDR's were ever returned. Only the message tracking log shows the failures. Ideas??? Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images 601 N. 34th Street Seattle, WA 98103 Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K front-end and back-end in different domains?
A while back I queried the group about putting E2K front-end servers in a different domain (but same forest) than the backend servers. A couple of people responded that they could indeed be in different domains and were in fact running that way. Based on that positive feedback, I decided to try it out in test, and lo and behold it does seem to work (very limited testing so far...). Now the weird part: While perusing the Microsoft document titled "Exchange Front-end and Back-end Topology White Paper" for firewall information, I found a blurb on page 16 that specifically states that back-end servers must be in the same domain as the front-end servers. I had missed that entirely in previous reads! This paper is dated July 2000. I'm hoping that this is either wrong, or outdated (superceded by a service pack perhaps?) Does anyone have any references showing that this supported? I really hate to burn a PSS call on this... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk
IMO FE/BE is simply a load balancing method by protocol. For an access point put ISA Server in the DMZ, OWA on a computer in the internal, and the Exchange store on another computer in the internal. Create web publishing rules on ISA Server for the OWA computer. Use a 3rd party to LB server publishing ISA Servers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Securing the OWA Kiosk One thing for sure that all users have to know is to make sure they close the browser window besides just logging off. Most do not even though a setting will tell the user to close the browser window. So maybe a product like Messageware would be OK. Also I would install some type of SSL security if OWA is going to be a major access point. Also if there are going to be many users using this type of access a Front-end/Backend solution is in order. - Original Message - From: "Martin, Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk > On the common practice follow-up question, I should have been a bit more > concise by indicating that my question relates to users who are connecting > to our corporate email system via the Internet, not internal users. > > Jon > > -Original Message- > From: Martin, Jon > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:38 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk > > Mark, > > Thanks - interesting audit. If we decide to go forward with allowing non-VPN > clients access to Outlook we will take a closer look at the product. Is > anyone aware of similar products? > > A question for the group on a related topic: is it common practice to allow > non-VPN clients to access Outlook via OWA, or do most companies require at > least a VPN connection? > > Jon > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk > > Jon, > > You could have a look at this OWA audit for some more details. Be aware that > the document is useful, but the issues in it (as well as your #1) are > handled by Messageware's SecureLogoff product. > > http://www.messageware.net/audits/owa.html > > -Original Message- > From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Securing the OWA Kiosk > > > How are folks handling the following potential security risks using OWA from > unsecured workstations, such as a kiosk or library environment? > > 1. Cached web pages, etc. on the workstation. User walks away without > closing the browser, the next user has access to the previous users' email. > > 2. Stealth keyboard capture program grabs userids and passwords. > > It seems like there is a common train of thought about remote OWA that 'It > is only email, what is the worst that could happen?' My take is someone who > has unauthorized access to email can potentially: > > - Get people fired; > - Get people arrested; > - Get companies/people sued; > - Cost companies/people money. > > Thanks . . . > > Jon Martin > Systems Programmer > East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) > Oakland, CA > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List p
OT: looking for good Oracle list
Have a recommendation for an Oracle list? Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PFADMIN
Is anyone familiar with PFADMIN? I am looking for a way to systematically add myself as an owner to all public folders in order to assess the current environment in preparation for Exchange 2000. I am looking at the help files and it appears that I can at the very least write a batch file that adds myself as an owner to each Top Level folder (there a switch to add to all subfolders.) My question is, will that overwrite the existing permissions? I want to just add myself as an owner without affecting anyone else's ACLs. If this does not work, does anyone have any other suggestions or solutions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ugh, Argh I know it's here, I can't find it.
Here you are. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314532 -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ugh, Argh I know it's here, I can't find it. Ok you know in OWA 5.5 SPK4 the issue when you click open email message and no text appears in body, only a reply or forward will display it ? It's a easy fix I've done it, I just can't find the fix, the troubleshooting OWA from MS URL no longer exists either. I know it's not a full blown diag problem, I know it's a simple one... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: the IBM Shark
Hi this is Ben Thompson. I am the Sr. Network Engineer at the college that Liz is the Exchange Administrator. (I just also happen to dual as her husband.) We have had a Shark for several years now. The performance is great. You may want to look at NT related buffering issues when dealing with its performance, we did not have to modify anything to get it working though. We are a Compaq shop and the Compaq SANS just was not up to spec for Novell, NT/2000, and AIX/Linux. (Novell is not even supported with NT on the same unit at the same time.) Exchange has been working wonderfully, as well as Novell, Linux, DOS and 2000. (We are Exchange 5.5) We have been booting from the SANS since day one, something IBM does not like but will support. We also run our production Oracle database on the Shark. If that performance lagged for any reason I would have 3 major sites and 11 remote sites down my throat in a heartbeat. If anyone would care to look at our installation, feel free to e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I can set it up. As to SSA blowing chunks, most people thought the same of Token-Ring. Just because something is more complicated to understand and expensive does not make the architecture "blow chunks", just cost prohibitive. Benjamin N. Thompson Senior Network Engineer/Manager CCBC - Catonsville Campus -Original Message- From: Exchange (Swynk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: the IBM Shark It's definitely related to the architecture -- SSA blows chunks. We've had several IBM guys out here to apply their "expertise" (read: blindly poke around) . plus, paying $30k x 2 for just a couple hundred gb is highway robbery! Can you tell I hate IBM? :) > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 6:58 AM > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) > Conversation: the IBM Shark > Subject: RE: the IBM Shark > > > While I know the Compaq stuff is some of the best out there, > I'd be very > interested to see if the performance issues you're seeing aren't more > directly related to poor drive/array/LUN partitioning rather > than issues > with specific architecture - after all, once it leaves the > HBA, FC is FC. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Exchange (Swynk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 1:11 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: the IBM Shark > > > > > > We have a Shark here and found that it is CRAP when it comes to I/O > > intensive Win32 applications. Someone here got the bright > > idea to have > > an enterprise-wide SAN solution, instead of looking at it from the > > perspective of how each platform actually works the Shark works > > great for legacy (i.e. IBM) systems, and works marginally > well for NT > > file servers, but try sticking a large SQL database on > there and watch > > what happens. Of all the SANs out there (at least 18 > months ago when > > ours was purchased), the Shark was one of the most expensive, > > and one of > > the slowest. It may not be the same with newer Sharks, but > ours is a > > slow-as-hell drive technology that choked whenever we tested SQL > > databases and Exchange 5.5 on it. > > > > We have found that Compaq's SAN solution works well for our > > environment > > -- it's almost half the price of comparable storage on the > Shark, and > > much much faster. Since we're an all-Compaq shop for our > > Win32 systems, > > that's what we're moving to now. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Posted At: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:29 AM > > > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) > > > Conversation: the IBM Shark > > > Subject: OT: the IBM Shark > > > > > > > > > Is anyone here happen to be running a IBM shark or possibly a > > > Hitachi 9900 > > > series SAN? We are looking at both of these and I have heard > > > rumors that > > > the shark has a performance boundary of 3.36 TB. Just curious. > > > > > > e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Moderated Folders Under Outlook2000 & Ex2K
Anyone have any experience with setting up "moderated folders" in Outlook2000/Exchange2000? Trying to setup a "customized response" but getting error message that says I haven't filled out all the requested information. According to the help screen all you do is put in the message text and save. Searched technet and only located articles dealing with Ex5.0 - 5.5. Standard response seems to work OK. Running Ex2k Sp2 / W2K Sp2. Native mode on both... Thanks Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mxtreme or similar
Looking for opinions on the Borderware Mxtreme and also looking for products that have similar functionality. For E2K. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk
Tony, You may not realize that closing the browser does not always work. Try the audit plan test case #1. Mark -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Securing the OWA Kiosk One thing for sure that all users have to know is to make sure they close the browser window besides just logging off. Most do not even though a setting will tell the user to close the browser window. So maybe a product like Messageware would be OK. Also I would install some type of SSL security if OWA is going to be a major access point. Also if there are going to be many users using this type of access a Front-end/Backend solution is in order. - Original Message - From: "Martin, Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk > On the common practice follow-up question, I should have been a bit more > concise by indicating that my question relates to users who are connecting > to our corporate email system via the Internet, not internal users. > > Jon > > -Original Message- > From: Martin, Jon > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:38 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk > > Mark, > > Thanks - interesting audit. If we decide to go forward with allowing non-VPN > clients access to Outlook we will take a closer look at the product. Is > anyone aware of similar products? > > A question for the group on a related topic: is it common practice to allow > non-VPN clients to access Outlook via OWA, or do most companies require at > least a VPN connection? > > Jon > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk > > Jon, > > You could have a look at this OWA audit for some more details. Be aware that > the document is useful, but the issues in it (as well as your #1) are > handled by Messageware's SecureLogoff product. > > http://www.messageware.net/audits/owa.html > > -Original Message- > From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Securing the OWA Kiosk > > > How are folks handling the following potential security risks using OWA from > unsecured workstations, such as a kiosk or library environment? > > 1. Cached web pages, etc. on the workstation. User walks away without > closing the browser, the next user has access to the previous users' email. > > 2. Stealth keyboard capture program grabs userids and passwords. > > It seems like there is a common train of thought about remote OWA that 'It > is only email, what is the worst that could happen?' My take is someone who > has unauthorized access to email can potentially: > > - Get people fired; > - Get people arrested; > - Get companies/people sued; > - Cost companies/people money. > > Thanks . . . > > Jon Martin > Systems Programmer > East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) > Oakland, CA > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Securing the OWA Kiosk
One thing for sure that all users have to know is to make sure they close the browser window besides just logging off. Most do not even though a setting will tell the user to close the browser window. So maybe a product like Messageware would be OK. Also I would install some type of SSL security if OWA is going to be a major access point. Also if there are going to be many users using this type of access a Front-end/Backend solution is in order. - Original Message - From: "Martin, Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk > On the common practice follow-up question, I should have been a bit more > concise by indicating that my question relates to users who are connecting > to our corporate email system via the Internet, not internal users. > > Jon > > -Original Message- > From: Martin, Jon > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:38 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk > > Mark, > > Thanks - interesting audit. If we decide to go forward with allowing non-VPN > clients access to Outlook we will take a closer look at the product. Is > anyone aware of similar products? > > A question for the group on a related topic: is it common practice to allow > non-VPN clients to access Outlook via OWA, or do most companies require at > least a VPN connection? > > Jon > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:52 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk > > Jon, > > You could have a look at this OWA audit for some more details. Be aware that > the document is useful, but the issues in it (as well as your #1) are > handled by Messageware's SecureLogoff product. > > http://www.messageware.net/audits/owa.html > > -Original Message- > From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Securing the OWA Kiosk > > > How are folks handling the following potential security risks using OWA from > unsecured workstations, such as a kiosk or library environment? > > 1. Cached web pages, etc. on the workstation. User walks away without > closing the browser, the next user has access to the previous users' email. > > 2. Stealth keyboard capture program grabs userids and passwords. > > It seems like there is a common train of thought about remote OWA that 'It > is only email, what is the worst that could happen?' My take is someone who > has unauthorized access to email can potentially: > > - Get people fired; > - Get people arrested; > - Get companies/people sued; > - Cost companies/people money. > > Thanks . . . > > Jon Martin > Systems Programmer > East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) > Oakland, CA > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk
On the common practice follow-up question, I should have been a bit more concise by indicating that my question relates to users who are connecting to our corporate email system via the Internet, not internal users. Jon -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk Mark, Thanks - interesting audit. If we decide to go forward with allowing non-VPN clients access to Outlook we will take a closer look at the product. Is anyone aware of similar products? A question for the group on a related topic: is it common practice to allow non-VPN clients to access Outlook via OWA, or do most companies require at least a VPN connection? Jon -Original Message- From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk Jon, You could have a look at this OWA audit for some more details. Be aware that the document is useful, but the issues in it (as well as your #1) are handled by Messageware's SecureLogoff product. http://www.messageware.net/audits/owa.html -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing the OWA Kiosk How are folks handling the following potential security risks using OWA from unsecured workstations, such as a kiosk or library environment? 1. Cached web pages, etc. on the workstation. User walks away without closing the browser, the next user has access to the previous users' email. 2. Stealth keyboard capture program grabs userids and passwords. It seems like there is a common train of thought about remote OWA that 'It is only email, what is the worst that could happen?' My take is someone who has unauthorized access to email can potentially: - Get people fired; - Get people arrested; - Get companies/people sued; - Cost companies/people money. Thanks . . . Jon Martin Systems Programmer East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Oakland, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk
Mark, Thanks - interesting audit. If we decide to go forward with allowing non-VPN clients access to Outlook we will take a closer look at the product. Is anyone aware of similar products? A question for the group on a related topic: is it common practice to allow non-VPN clients to access Outlook via OWA, or do most companies require at least a VPN connection? Jon -Original Message- From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk Jon, You could have a look at this OWA audit for some more details. Be aware that the document is useful, but the issues in it (as well as your #1) are handled by Messageware's SecureLogoff product. http://www.messageware.net/audits/owa.html -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing the OWA Kiosk How are folks handling the following potential security risks using OWA from unsecured workstations, such as a kiosk or library environment? 1. Cached web pages, etc. on the workstation. User walks away without closing the browser, the next user has access to the previous users' email. 2. Stealth keyboard capture program grabs userids and passwords. It seems like there is a common train of thought about remote OWA that 'It is only email, what is the worst that could happen?' My take is someone who has unauthorized access to email can potentially: - Get people fired; - Get people arrested; - Get companies/people sued; - Cost companies/people money. Thanks . . . Jon Martin Systems Programmer East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Oakland, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the OWA Kiosk
Jon, You could have a look at this OWA audit for some more details. Be aware that the document is useful, but the issues in it (as well as your #1) are handled by Messageware's SecureLogoff product. http://www.messageware.net/audits/owa.html -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing the OWA Kiosk How are folks handling the following potential security risks using OWA from unsecured workstations, such as a kiosk or library environment? 1. Cached web pages, etc. on the workstation. User walks away without closing the browser, the next user has access to the previous users' email. 2. Stealth keyboard capture program grabs userids and passwords. It seems like there is a common train of thought about remote OWA that 'It is only email, what is the worst that could happen?' My take is someone who has unauthorized access to email can potentially: - Get people fired; - Get people arrested; - Get companies/people sued; - Cost companies/people money. Thanks . . . Jon Martin Systems Programmer East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Oakland, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....
I thought header.exe was only on the 5.5 Resource Kit? - Original Message - From: "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 11:14 AM Subject: Re: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > Get header.exe from the Exchange RK and use it to create a header file > including all the information you want to import including the domain > account. Export the user list from the UK box, munge the account field with > an appropriate tool (Excel) and import it into your server. > > - Original Message - > From: "Joe Pochedley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:57 AM > Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > > > > You're right, I'm overtime exempt... :( > > > > I understand there's not going to be a manual way to do it, but I've used > > Exmerge in the past, and have gotten along quite well with it, so I > believe > > I'll be fine... It's only about 40 mailboxes... > > > > As I said in my original email, I'm hopping to create the mailboxes and > > associate them to domain accounts in a child domain (made from the UK's > old > > NT4 domain joining our forest as a child)... Still hoping someone can > tell > > me if this can be done? > > > > Joe Pochedley > > If you have time to do it twice, > > you had time to do it right in > > the first place. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:57 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > > > > > > Do you mean move the domain accounts, or the mail accounts? If the latter, > > setup a trust from the US to the UK. Use Exmerge to extract the UK users' > > data and import it into the US server. There's not going to be an > automated > > way to do this, sorry. Add to your laundry list "administrative headache" > > and charge them some overtime (but you're probably exempt). > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:08 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > > > > > > Daniel: Yes, email over a Internet based VPN, across the pond, nothing > but > > Net... :) As I said, I protested and gave the administration quite a > > laundry list of why it wasn't the best way to run thing, but they are the > > ones who pay the money so they're the ones who get to make the decision. > > > > Andrea: Thanks. I guess I should've referenced the materials I've read > > (including the MSKB article you referenced), a couple of the MS migration > > whitepapers, and a couple of Exchange books... Unfortunately they all > > reference moving things within the same domain... I need to know if I can > > use the accounts from the child domain on the parent domain's Exch server, > > which I can't find a straight answer to (of course, I've probably not > worded > > my question correctly in all the Internet searching I've done) > > > > Joe Pochedley > > If you have time to do it twice, > > you had time to do it right in > > the first place. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:28 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > > > > > > You might want to look at > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886 for some > > ideas. Other than that, the MS KB is a good source of info. It's got > loads > > of good step by step guides. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 11 December 2002 9:48 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > > > > > > Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange > mess > > that I've been tasked with handling. > > > > We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of > > the UK. The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange > servers > > (one at each company) into a single server. Of course I protested > > veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave > them > > many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision > was > > theirs AH well > > > > We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased > company > > is running the same... I am in the process of testing and preparing to > > deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA... After AD's in place I plan to > > upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K. > > > > Now for the messy part... I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our > > Exch2K server... What I was planning was this: Upgrade their ne
RE: Strange POP3 Error
>From EventId.net Event ID: 13008 Source MSExchange Pop3 Interface Type Error Description A FormatMessage operation for message 0x80040115 failed. Returning NULL. Comments Adrian Grigorof: Suggested action: 1. Apply sp3 2. Remove antivrus software, then apply sp3 and then reinstall antivirus software 3. Run optimizer 4. run isinteg - fix 5. check the NIC for any problems 6. Increase the page file size (SBS should have a pagefile of a minimum of 256 mb) Contributors Adrian Grigorof -Original Message- From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange POP3 Error I found this on my Exchange server (Exch 5.5/SP4, WinNT 4/SP6a) today. I cannot find any reference to this Event ID, with the exception of the Event ID website and that doesn't tell me much of anything. We only have a few POP users and no one has complained about problems. Any ideas? Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchange Pop3 Interface Event Category: Configuration Event ID: 13008 Date: 12/11/2002 Time: 4:37:08 PM User: N/A Computer: MOONBOY Description: A FormatMessage operation for message 0x80040115 failed. Returning NULL. --- Chuck Parkey Creative Teaching Press _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange POP3 Error
I found this on my Exchange server (Exch 5.5/SP4, WinNT 4/SP6a) today. I cannot find any reference to this Event ID, with the exception of the Event ID website and that doesn't tell me much of anything. We only have a few POP users and no one has complained about problems. Any ideas? Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchange Pop3 Interface Event Category: Configuration Event ID: 13008 Date: 12/11/2002 Time: 4:37:08 PM User: N/A Computer: MOONBOY Description: A FormatMessage operation for message 0x80040115 failed. Returning NULL. --- Chuck Parkey Creative Teaching Press _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....
Get header.exe from the Exchange RK and use it to create a header file including all the information you want to import including the domain account. Export the user list from the UK box, munge the account field with an appropriate tool (Excel) and import it into your server. - Original Message - From: "Joe Pochedley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:57 AM Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > You're right, I'm overtime exempt... :( > > I understand there's not going to be a manual way to do it, but I've used > Exmerge in the past, and have gotten along quite well with it, so I believe > I'll be fine... It's only about 40 mailboxes... > > As I said in my original email, I'm hopping to create the mailboxes and > associate them to domain accounts in a child domain (made from the UK's old > NT4 domain joining our forest as a child)... Still hoping someone can tell > me if this can be done? > > Joe Pochedley > If you have time to do it twice, > you had time to do it right in > the first place. > > > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > > > Do you mean move the domain accounts, or the mail accounts? If the latter, > setup a trust from the US to the UK. Use Exmerge to extract the UK users' > data and import it into the US server. There's not going to be an automated > way to do this, sorry. Add to your laundry list "administrative headache" > and charge them some overtime (but you're probably exempt). > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:08 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > > > Daniel: Yes, email over a Internet based VPN, across the pond, nothing but > Net... :) As I said, I protested and gave the administration quite a > laundry list of why it wasn't the best way to run thing, but they are the > ones who pay the money so they're the ones who get to make the decision. > > Andrea: Thanks. I guess I should've referenced the materials I've read > (including the MSKB article you referenced), a couple of the MS migration > whitepapers, and a couple of Exchange books... Unfortunately they all > reference moving things within the same domain... I need to know if I can > use the accounts from the child domain on the parent domain's Exch server, > which I can't find a straight answer to (of course, I've probably not worded > my question correctly in all the Internet searching I've done) > > Joe Pochedley > If you have time to do it twice, > you had time to do it right in > the first place. > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:28 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > > > You might want to look at > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886 for some > ideas. Other than that, the MS KB is a good source of info. It's got loads > of good step by step guides. > > > -Original Message- > From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11 December 2002 9:48 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail > > > Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange mess > that I've been tasked with handling. > > We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of > the UK. The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange servers > (one at each company) into a single server. Of course I protested > veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave them > many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision was > theirs AH well > > We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased company > is running the same... I am in the process of testing and preparing to > deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA... After AD's in place I plan to > upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K. > > Now for the messy part... I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our > Exch2K server... What I was planning was this: Upgrade their network to > Win2K as a child domain of ours... Then using Exmerge, pull out their > mailboxes and transfer them to our Exchange server (they've only got a 600mb > priv.edb, so it's nothing compared to our 90Gb database)... I've read on > migration strategies, etc, but nothing really covers moving mail from one > domain to another or if making them a child domain (basically creating a two > way transitive trust between the two domains) gets around the problem... > > So the questions are these: Can I make new mailboxes
RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....
You're right, I'm overtime exempt... :( I understand there's not going to be a manual way to do it, but I've used Exmerge in the past, and have gotten along quite well with it, so I believe I'll be fine... It's only about 40 mailboxes... As I said in my original email, I'm hopping to create the mailboxes and associate them to domain accounts in a child domain (made from the UK's old NT4 domain joining our forest as a child)... Still hoping someone can tell me if this can be done? Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail Do you mean move the domain accounts, or the mail accounts? If the latter, setup a trust from the US to the UK. Use Exmerge to extract the UK users' data and import it into the US server. There's not going to be an automated way to do this, sorry. Add to your laundry list "administrative headache" and charge them some overtime (but you're probably exempt). -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail Daniel: Yes, email over a Internet based VPN, across the pond, nothing but Net... :) As I said, I protested and gave the administration quite a laundry list of why it wasn't the best way to run thing, but they are the ones who pay the money so they're the ones who get to make the decision. Andrea: Thanks. I guess I should've referenced the materials I've read (including the MSKB article you referenced), a couple of the MS migration whitepapers, and a couple of Exchange books... Unfortunately they all reference moving things within the same domain... I need to know if I can use the accounts from the child domain on the parent domain's Exch server, which I can't find a straight answer to (of course, I've probably not worded my question correctly in all the Internet searching I've done) Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail You might want to look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886 for some ideas. Other than that, the MS KB is a good source of info. It's got loads of good step by step guides. -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 9:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange mess that I've been tasked with handling. We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of the UK. The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange servers (one at each company) into a single server. Of course I protested veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave them many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision was theirs AH well We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased company is running the same... I am in the process of testing and preparing to deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA... After AD's in place I plan to upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K. Now for the messy part... I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our Exch2K server... What I was planning was this: Upgrade their network to Win2K as a child domain of ours... Then using Exmerge, pull out their mailboxes and transfer them to our Exchange server (they've only got a 600mb priv.edb, so it's nothing compared to our 90Gb database)... I've read on migration strategies, etc, but nothing really covers moving mail from one domain to another or if making them a child domain (basically creating a two way transitive trust between the two domains) gets around the problem... So the questions are these: Can I make new mailboxes on the USA Exch2K server from users in the child domain in the UK (I assume the answer is yes, but I haven't gotten that far in testing yet and I'm just trying to avoid some head banging if someone can tell me it can't be done)? Is there an easier way to accomplish this? How can I move the Public folders to our Exch server? Thanks in advance for your kind wisdom. Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
HELP 5.5 message routing -> 2000 ?
Okay, maybe this is a better subject line. I've taken a look at recipient polcies as an alternative but they don't really do what I want them to. Really what I want is that if a user as an address: [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want smoo@ to work for a variety of domains. In the case of recipient policies, this isn't really possible if smoo isn't associated with the user in AD in any way. Another issue is that when I adjust the default domain policy to include things like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] as valid E-Mail addresses and I apply the recipient policy the changes don't go into effect for anyone. That is, if I check the E-Mail Addresses tab in ADUC they're not there. Shouldn't they be? -Yanek. > -Original Message- > From: Yanek Korff > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: basic questions > > > > Working on preparing my Exchange 2000 box to accept mail (The > 5.5 server is doing this now). I'm a little confused about > the relationship between SMTP Connectors, the SMTP virtual > server, etc and how mail is routed by domains. For example... > > On my 5.5 server, my IMS is configured under the Routing tab > to reroute incoming SMTP mail for a variety of domains to > (well, one is inbound, the rest route to that). > This enables all users to have only one set of SMTP addresses > (the one that routes to inbound) and all other domains get > rerouted to that domain... > > Can someone point me to the appropriate place where I can RTFM? > > -Yanek. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Odd message from other mail server
Ensure that the webware SMTP daemon is indeed sending .. to end the SMTP conversation. This is what the error message is referring to. Some mailers aren't as strict about it but that is the proper format. Qmail is claiming that the mailer is sending .. to end the conversation. -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Odd message from other mail server I am getting an odd response from a mail server that I am attempting to send a message to (fast.net). Here is the message that their server is sending at the end of my message. "451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html"; A main snippet, referencing the error, from that website says: "It was generated by qmail, an Internet message transfer agent. Your mailer tried to send an e-mail message to a server running qmail. Unfortunately, qmail spotted a problem: your mailer sent a bare LF." There are a couple of things that are odd about the situation. 1. The mail that is being rejected appears to have a CR at the end of the message. The message end just like all the other messages that are sent or received by our server. Here is a portion of the capture of the data stream from the message that generates the error. href="http://www.tankstatus.com/ssa_pipeline";>SSA Version 1.0 Copyright (c) Intelligent Controls, Inc. 1997-2002 . 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html. QUIT 221 Catch you later In the actual capture utility window it shows a box [] after the period just above the line starting with '451 See...' 2. The mail that is sent and rejected is auto generated by one of our web servers (tankstatus.com) based on an event. It is in HTML format and relayed through our Exchange 5.5 server (on separate box). An original message is attached. 3. I am able to sent mail to the host in question (fast.net) from my work station (outlook 2002). The main difference is that my mails are not in html format. 4. We operate this service for several customers and have never had a problem with them receiving our automated emails, which for the most part are identical. This is so odd that I am not even sure where to go to trouble shoot, or even what question(s) to ask in this list. Has anyone got any insight, former experience, suggestions or smart ass comments? At this point anything would be helpful. Doug _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....
Do you mean move the domain accounts, or the mail accounts? If the latter, setup a trust from the US to the UK. Use Exmerge to extract the UK users' data and import it into the US server. There's not going to be an automated way to do this, sorry. Add to your laundry list "administrative headache" and charge them some overtime (but you're probably exempt). -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail Daniel: Yes, email over a Internet based VPN, across the pond, nothing but Net... :) As I said, I protested and gave the administration quite a laundry list of why it wasn't the best way to run thing, but they are the ones who pay the money so they're the ones who get to make the decision. Andrea: Thanks. I guess I should've referenced the materials I've read (including the MSKB article you referenced), a couple of the MS migration whitepapers, and a couple of Exchange books... Unfortunately they all reference moving things within the same domain... I need to know if I can use the accounts from the child domain on the parent domain's Exch server, which I can't find a straight answer to (of course, I've probably not worded my question correctly in all the Internet searching I've done) Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail You might want to look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886 for some ideas. Other than that, the MS KB is a good source of info. It's got loads of good step by step guides. -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 9:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange mess that I've been tasked with handling. We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of the UK. The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange servers (one at each company) into a single server. Of course I protested veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave them many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision was theirs AH well We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased company is running the same... I am in the process of testing and preparing to deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA... After AD's in place I plan to upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K. Now for the messy part... I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our Exch2K server... What I was planning was this: Upgrade their network to Win2K as a child domain of ours... Then using Exmerge, pull out their mailboxes and transfer them to our Exchange server (they've only got a 600mb priv.edb, so it's nothing compared to our 90Gb database)... I've read on migration strategies, etc, but nothing really covers moving mail from one domain to another or if making them a child domain (basically creating a two way transitive trust between the two domains) gets around the problem... So the questions are these: Can I make new mailboxes on the USA Exch2K server from users in the child domain in the UK (I assume the answer is yes, but I haven't gotten that far in testing yet and I'm just trying to avoid some head banging if someone can tell me it can't be done)? Is there an easier way to accomplish this? How can I move the Public folders to our Exch server? Thanks in advance for your kind wisdom. Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....
Hi, Based on what you say about the informatoin store size, if I can presume that you are going to migrate a few users (That depends on you as to what you classify as few); did you consider the option of making pst files of all users, make your exchange server resolve both the domain names.. or be the MX record holder for both the domains and you manually create each user... and then import the pst files into your exchange server. for them to be able to check there mails from U.K change the client settings on each client. What says you to this ... -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail Daniel: Yes, email over a Internet based VPN, across the pond, nothing but Net... :) As I said, I protested and gave the administration quite a laundry list of why it wasn't the best way to run thing, but they are the ones who pay the money so they're the ones who get to make the decision. Andrea: Thanks. I guess I should've referenced the materials I've read (including the MSKB article you referenced), a couple of the MS migration whitepapers, and a couple of Exchange books... Unfortunately they all reference moving things within the same domain... I need to know if I can use the accounts from the child domain on the parent domain's Exch server, which I can't find a straight answer to (of course, I've probably not worded my question correctly in all the Internet searching I've done) Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail You might want to look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886 for some ideas. Other than that, the MS KB is a good source of info. It's got loads of good step by step guides. -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 9:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange mess that I've been tasked with handling. We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of the UK. The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange servers (one at each company) into a single server. Of course I protested veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave them many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision was theirs AH well We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased company is running the same... I am in the process of testing and preparing to deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA... After AD's in place I plan to upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K. Now for the messy part... I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our Exch2K server... What I was planning was this: Upgrade their network to Win2K as a child domain of ours... Then using Exmerge, pull out their mailboxes and transfer them to our Exchange server (they've only got a 600mb priv.edb, so it's nothing compared to our 90Gb database)... I've read on migration strategies, etc, but nothing really covers moving mail from one domain to another or if making them a child domain (basically creating a two way transitive trust between the two domains) gets around the problem... So the questions are these: Can I make new mailboxes on the USA Exch2K server from users in the child domain in the UK (I assume the answer is yes, but I haven't gotten that far in testing yet and I'm just trying to avoid some head banging if someone can tell me it can't be done)? Is there an easier way to accomplish this? How can I move the Public folders to our Exch server? Thanks in advance for your kind wisdom. Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
Are you in Exchange 2000 Native Mode yet? -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2002 00:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Interesting I don't have that function available. These are Public folders I migrated over from a Exchange 5.5 server via a pst file. They show as having email addresses already but if you right click, all tasks you only get Mail Enable it's as if Exchange doesn't know about the email addresses. Yet it works perfectly. I may need to recreated the Folders and copy the contents over to fix up the problem. Though looking at the default Folder Tree, it is set to MAPI Clients so I expect it will always create Mail Enabled folders which cannot be changed. Andy -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Andy, In ESM navigate to the public folder, right click, All Tasks, Mail Disable. Voila, Mike -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 09:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Is there a way to un "mail enable" a Public Folder? Apart from deleting and re-creating. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Very OT - txt handling
If you have access to one, CMS PIPES and REXX on an IBM mainframe would eat this for breakfast without breaking a sweat. Use an at command or the task scheduler to ftp the files down to the mainframe and write a disconnected service machine there to parse the data. > I have the following example (txt) > > 45 14:53:52 ENTRANCE ARTS (2) ACCESS GRANTED KIM SCHOTANUS (16788937) > 46 15:14:52 EXIT ARTS GRANTED > 47 16:00:48 ENTRANCE ARTS (2) ACCESS GRANTED PROCOPIO ALB (07723137) > 48 16:52:24 EXIT ARTS (3) ACCESS GRANTED BECKERS PAUL (04906723) > ... > > In this example the first line is the line number, that is reset to 00 > after 99, then there is the time, the action performed -ENTRANCE ARTS > (2) ACCESS GRANTED- and the name and permission code. > Line 46 is a special command, this is when someone overrides > the system > (which happens quite often) > > after each 20 lines there is a blank line and then a line > with the date _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DMZ Options
This migration is to 2000. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ugh, Argh I know it's here, I can't find it.
Not being too familiar with OWA for Exch5.5, is it something similar to the cutoff HTML text problem under OL2000? In that instance it's a bad MLANG.DLL file... Just a suggestion. Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ugh, Argh I know it's here, I can't find it. Ok you know in OWA 5.5 SPK4 the issue when you click open email message and no text appears in body, only a reply or forward will display it ? It's a easy fix I've done it, I just can't find the fix, the troubleshooting OWA from MS URL no longer exists either. I know it's not a full blown diag problem, I know it's a simple one... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....
Daniel: Yes, email over a Internet based VPN, across the pond, nothing but Net... :) As I said, I protested and gave the administration quite a laundry list of why it wasn't the best way to run thing, but they are the ones who pay the money so they're the ones who get to make the decision. Andrea: Thanks. I guess I should've referenced the materials I've read (including the MSKB article you referenced), a couple of the MS migration whitepapers, and a couple of Exchange books... Unfortunately they all reference moving things within the same domain... I need to know if I can use the accounts from the child domain on the parent domain's Exch server, which I can't find a straight answer to (of course, I've probably not worded my question correctly in all the Internet searching I've done) Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail You might want to look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886 for some ideas. Other than that, the MS KB is a good source of info. It's got loads of good step by step guides. -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 9:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange mess that I've been tasked with handling. We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of the UK. The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange servers (one at each company) into a single server. Of course I protested veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave them many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision was theirs AH well We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased company is running the same... I am in the process of testing and preparing to deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA... After AD's in place I plan to upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K. Now for the messy part... I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our Exch2K server... What I was planning was this: Upgrade their network to Win2K as a child domain of ours... Then using Exmerge, pull out their mailboxes and transfer them to our Exchange server (they've only got a 600mb priv.edb, so it's nothing compared to our 90Gb database)... I've read on migration strategies, etc, but nothing really covers moving mail from one domain to another or if making them a child domain (basically creating a two way transitive trust between the two domains) gets around the problem... So the questions are these: Can I make new mailboxes on the USA Exch2K server from users in the child domain in the UK (I assume the answer is yes, but I haven't gotten that far in testing yet and I'm just trying to avoid some head banging if someone can tell me it can't be done)? Is there an easier way to accomplish this? How can I move the Public folders to our Exch server? Thanks in advance for your kind wisdom. Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
