RE: Making an Outlook folder permanent
Thanks to all that answered. -k- -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions I thought that default mailbox folders such as deleted item and others are not able to be deleted. If other just recover them as long as retention is set and possible setting Dumpster always on just in case. I have found that user can delete mailbox folders using the OWa interface. The only way to get them back was to use the reset folders switch when starting Outlook. I wonder if they fixed the OWA issue I ran across since E2K2000/SP1 From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Making an Outlook folder permanent Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:00:11 -0700 (PDT) You might be able revoke a user's ownership permissions on his mailbox and then assign him individual permissions on folders therein, but I strongly suspect that Outlook wouldn't function properly in that case. Even if you could, I think it would probably be a waste of time. It would probably be easier to write a daemon that scans all mailboxes and puts back the folder if people delete it. Ed --- Adams, Kevin C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, Can anyone tell me if there is way to make a folder in a users mailbox that they cant delete? Any way at all? Thanks, -K- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SAN
My biggest problem is the amount of jerk-off sellers.
We asked for
i) a san
ii) some direct-attatched external storage
The amount of vendors who took those comments on board, asked what we wanted them for,
and then promptly quoted for a NAS device was quite depressing. Idiots.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19/09/2003 20:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN
I'll kindly ask you to get off of my soapbox.
My favorite one I've heard lately: Well, it uses fiber to attach to the SAN
so it's much faster for Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN
As long as you don't buy into the great white lie of SAN's, you're golden.
That lie is that there's no performance hit created by taking a single large
array and carving it into a bunch of LUNs - there's a physics issue there.
Other than that, its just a bunch of disks, just like the SCSI attached ones
you probably have now.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and SAN
Has anyone ran Exchange in a SAN, and were there any issues
with it? I've
always had a raid array attached to it which could be the
same thing but did
not know if there were any major differences? Any help would
be appreciate
it.
Thanks,
Mario
**
*
The contents of this communication are intended only for the
addressee and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you
are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this communication that do not relate to the official
business of my company shall be understood as neither given
nor endorsed by
it.
**
*
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
â²Úh²PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(ú«qïÞÅÈ_j¨mg{^özm§ÿâÊZ®Ib²×(÷
¸§þ\«Êez{^ì\
©àz¶j zV§éà+!N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²)åËZvh§³
§Ê
RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Interesting. This problem just cropped up here at my organization about 12 hours ago. Have you been able to find out anything more? -K- -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Importance: High all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Use of OST's over WAN
Gavin, Have done something like this for a number of people by setting to work offline, but synchronize on a schedule that keeps them fairly up to date. Not real time but you can set the sync time to something that doesn't kill your bandwidth. Jack -Original Message- From: Gavin Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 Sep 2003 11:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Use of OST's over WAN I am looking for some light reading/information to confirm the behaviour with using OST's over a WAN link. I have a remote office that connects to the main office over a 128k VPN connection. This pipe is shared between 5 other users, including all their internet traffic, so can get pretty slow at times. They currently retrieve their email from a 3rd party ISP, using POP3, but I want to pull them into the Exchange Org, to gain the benefits of the Exchange server. My issue is, I can't configure them to access the Exchange server directly over the 128k pipe, as Outlook/Exchange response is simply too slow. I don't want to go down the PST route, I am aware of the pitfalls there. That leaves the OST option. If I configure the Outlook client to use OSTs and synch in all folders, does Outlook always refer to the local OST first for information ie filed document/email/calender item etc, instead of going out to the Exchange server, over the slow wan link, even if the Exchange server is available? If so I think this is my answer as the WAN delay only comes into play when they are synchronisng with the server. I can't simply try it and see as I am not at the remote office and the guys there are not up to doing this themselves! I have read http://support.microsoft.com/?id=161889 which didn't shed much light! I have referred to the FAQ but that simply hightlights the dangers with PSTs. Can somebody point me to a document with the necessary info? Thanks Gavin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick Level Backup
I don't know if this makes a difference or not, but the setup I use is this: ARCserve machine installed using MSSQL database I backup everything to a SCSI Array (I keep 5 days backup on the array of all servers) Every night I dump everything to tape (LTO 100/200) So I have never had to restore anything from tape. And I also do a full backup of the backup server to tape. So the worst case is I will have to restore the backup server then restore all my other servers once the backup server is up or restore each server individually. You might laugh at this method, but it works. Christopher -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Be sure to tell us how well the restore goes... It's not that we don't like it because it doesn't backup; it has a serious problem with restoring... -Original Message- From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup Why is everyone against ARCserve? I have been using ARCserve v. 9.01 to do brick level backups and I have never have a problem with it. The largest mailbox that I do a brick level backup on is 729megs and most of the mailboxes are over 100megs. I have never had a failed job and I have done successful restores. I would have to say the ARCserve 9.01 is a solid product it is a 200% improvement over ARCserve 7. The only bad thing I can say is that it is a little on the expensive side, but I use it to backup 6 servers and 3 databases. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Making an Outlook folder permanent
Ffolder Utility: Utility to rename or delete special Outlook folders such as the Calendar, Tasks, Inbox, and Contacts. VB source code included. http://www.slipstick.com/addins/gallery/index.htm#ffolder Look on technet for the information on how to rebuild the system folder with the /ResetFolders switch if needed: OL2000: Additional Command-Line Switches http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b197180 -Original Message- From: Adams, Kevin C. To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/19/03 11:18 PM Subject: RE: Making an Outlook folder permanent Thanks to all that answered. -k- -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions I thought that default mailbox folders such as deleted item and others are not able to be deleted. If other just recover them as long as retention is set and possible setting Dumpster always on just in case. I have found that user can delete mailbox folders using the OWa interface. The only way to get them back was to use the reset folders switch when starting Outlook. I wonder if they fixed the OWA issue I ran across since E2K2000/SP1 From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Making an Outlook folder permanent Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:00:11 -0700 (PDT) You might be able revoke a user's ownership permissions on his mailbox and then assign him individual permissions on folders therein, but I strongly suspect that Outlook wouldn't function properly in that case. Even if you could, I think it would probably be a waste of time. It would probably be easier to write a daemon that scans all mailboxes and puts back the folder if people delete it. Ed --- Adams, Kevin C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, Can anyone tell me if there is way to make a folder in a users mailbox that they cant delete? Any way at all? Thanks, -K- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
