RE: Unable to display the folder...
To force you to restart the services whenever you change something... :-) PS: that means that if you can't wait 2 hours, restarting exchange services will sync the DS and IS, setting the permissions. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 01, 2003 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... Is there a reason this feature was built-in? Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... You need to wait a couple of hours for it to actually take. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URL Problem
In IE: Tools/Internet Options - Advanced Tab Untick Reuse windows for launching shortcuts -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 25, 2003 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URL Problem User Group Outlook 2000 SR1 Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Internet Explorer 5.5 SP1 If you have Internet Explorer open and you are at lets say www.support.com and you also have Outlook open and the mail has a URL in it say www.google.com and you click on the url in outlook it does not open a new window but uses the existing window that is already open. Is there a reg fix or any other settings to overcome this problem so that it opens a new window. So there is two explorer windows open. Any constructive comments would be very much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections
Disclaimer.. I'm working on it... I can't stand it either. ... I want to block unencrypted because I don't want unencrypted Outlook connections going over the internet.. Before you propose a VPN... it breaks connections and is very unstable.. We have it and use it, but want to drop it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 15, 2003 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections Why would you want to? And if you did, would you then be able to use a shorter sig/disclaimer? On 1/15/03 5:20, Andrea Coppini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just found out how to encrypt Outlook Exchange communication (ye I know it's simple, but I just couldn't see the checkbox...I guess it's GUI Dyslexia or something) Now I want to block all UNENCRYPTED communication, so Outlook MUST be set to encrypt, otherwise it won't connect. Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections
Too complex to configure and mantain. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 16, 2003 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections If the server is Win2k, what about using IPSec connections to the server? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections Disclaimer.. I'm working on it... I can't stand it either. ... I want to block unencrypted because I don't want unencrypted Outlook connections going over the internet.. Before you propose a VPN... it breaks connections and is very unstable.. We have it and use it, but want to drop it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 15, 2003 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections Why would you want to? And if you did, would you then be able to use a shorter sig/disclaimer? On 1/15/03 5:20, Andrea Coppini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just found out how to encrypt Outlook Exchange communication (ye I know it's simple, but I just couldn't see the checkbox...I guess it's GUI Dyslexia or something) Now I want to block all UNENCRYPTED communication, so Outlook MUST be set to encrypt, otherwise it won't connect. Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections
Hi, I just found out how to encrypt Outlook Exchange communication (ye I know it's simple, but I just couldn't see the checkbox...I guess it's GUI Dyslexia or something) Now I want to block all UNENCRYPTED communication, so Outlook MUST be set to encrypt, otherwise it won't connect. Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections
OK, and my question is... How do I do this? -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini Sent: January 15, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections Hi, I just found out how to encrypt Outlook Exchange communication (ye I know it's simple, but I just couldn't see the checkbox...I guess it's GUI Dyslexia or something) Now I want to block all UNENCRYPTED communication, so Outlook MUST be set to encrypt, otherwise it won't connect. Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail....
You might want to look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886 for some ideas. Other than that, the MS KB is a good source of info. It's got loads of good step by step guides. -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 9:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Purchased another company, need to migrate their mail Kind ladies and gentlemen, looking for a little feedback on an Exchange mess that I've been tasked with handling. We're located in the USA and recently we purchased a company based out of the UK. The administration has asked me to consolidate the Exchange servers (one at each company) into a single server. Of course I protested veheminently about having a single server for both the US and UK, gave them many many reasons why it shouldn't be done, but ultimately the decision was theirs AH well We're currently running Exch5.5 on an NT4 domain, and the purchased company is running the same... I am in the process of testing and preparing to deploy Win2K and AD here in the USA... After AD's in place I plan to upgrade our Exch5.5 to Exch2K. Now for the messy part... I need to get the UK's mailboxes moved to our Exch2K server... What I was planning was this: Upgrade their network to Win2K as a child domain of ours... Then using Exmerge, pull out their mailboxes and transfer them to our Exchange server (they've only got a 600mb priv.edb, so it's nothing compared to our 90Gb database)... I've read on migration strategies, etc, but nothing really covers moving mail from one domain to another or if making them a child domain (basically creating a two way transitive trust between the two domains) gets around the problem... So the questions are these: Can I make new mailboxes on the USA Exch2K server from users in the child domain in the UK (I assume the answer is yes, but I haven't gotten that far in testing yet and I'm just trying to avoid some head banging if someone can tell me it can't be done)? Is there an easier way to accomplish this? How can I move the Public folders to our Exch server? Thanks in advance for your kind wisdom. Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Departed Employee Mail
For e-mail forwarding, use AD Users and Computers, double click on the mailbox, go to the Exchange General tab, click Delivery Options. In the 'Forwarding address' box click 'Forward to:'. Now click Modify to choose which mailbox (in your case the CEO's) you want to forward to. If you want a copy to be kept in the original mailbox, tick 'Deliver messages to both forwarding address and mailbox' For OOO, use Outlook Web Access to get into the original mailbox. If you have Exchange Admin rights and are NOT a Domain Admin, you can simply use the following URL: http://exchange.server/mailboxaliasname and log in using your username and password. Alternatively, change the password of the original user and log in with his credentials. Note: If you are BOTH an Exchange Admin and a Domain Admin, Exchange 2k by default won't allow you to access other user's mailbox. There is a way around this which I don't remember offhand, let me know if you need it. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 December 2002 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Departed Employee Mail I need to clarify. The CEO wants the departed management members' mail forward to himself (the CEO), not to the departed person. I guess a lot of you work at large companies where being proactive or making decisions is not part of the culture. I work for a small pre-IPO biotech. I wear many hats. And if I don't make management aware of things they forget about it. I have to force them to tell me to inactivate accounts for folks that have been gone for months. Sh1t flows downhill. And to stay on topic I wanted to know specifically can these be done outside of Outlook, easily. I am simply trying to do what is best for the company to protect our IP and make my life a little more sane. Jim Liddil Induhvidual and Weasel :-) -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Departed Employee Mail Jim, I think Drew's point is, Why are you doing this without being formally told to, by someone in charge at your company? Who do you think they're going to hang, when they find out that classified/secret/business sensitive e-mails have been forwarded offsite to a former employee, that is taking that information to a competitor and doing God-knows what with it? I **GUARANTEE** it won't be the CEO. Jim Blunt E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. Office: 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Departed Employee Mail No. But we are a small company and if I don't at least look into how to do this stuff it will never happen. They never even thought about forwarding his mail until I suggested it. I can't even get them to tell me when to officially terminate his account. Jim -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Departed Employee Mail Have you been told to do that? Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Departed Employee Mail E2K/W2K. Management member leaves. For now the CEO says forward all his mail to him and allow the admin assistant access to his mail box. Without going in to Outlook is there a way to set an OOO message saying Mr X is no longer here please send all correspondents to via Exchange? Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
Microsoft has something called the 'Mobile Internet Server' or something to that effect. I believe it's made for access to mailboxes via Handhelds and Mobile Phones. The site used to be loaded with marketing crap so I couldn't find any hard facts. We don't officially support PDAs, but I (and a few others) use a PocketPC 2002 based Compaq set up to sync to my Outlook, and that works OK. I use it mostly for Tasks and Calender items, which work fine. We've had a few problems with e-mail formatting though. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Pennell, Ronald B. Subject: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes Has anyone had any experiences with using PDA's for accessing user mailboxes? Our company is starting to research use of PDA's. So far I have done some research on the BlackBerry site. Any recommendations as to server software for E2K SP2. Any hardware recommendations for the PDA's Thanks in advance Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
Beware of blackberry. Don't know about the situation in the states, but in Europe the GSM provider must specifically support blackberry (ie. Not any GSM provider with GPRS support). -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes http://blackberry.net/products/software/server/index.shtml Best way to go. Less hassle for the users. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:33 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Pennell, Ronald B. Subject: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes Has anyone had any experiences with using PDA's for accessing user mailboxes? Our company is starting to research use of PDA's. So far I have done some research on the BlackBerry site. Any recommendations as to server software for E2K SP2. Any hardware recommendations for the PDA's Thanks in advance Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
Since no one bothered to actually answer the question, I'll give it a try. Andrey, if you're using Exchange 2000, the memory munching is by design. STORE.EXE takes up as much available physical RAM as possible to cache mailboxes and speed up access. We have 1.2Gb in our Exch, and Store.exe's usage hovers around 800mb. This is completely normal. Also, it will (should) automatically reduce its memory utilization when other applications start needing it (eg. Backup jobs, opening of software or large admin tools on the exchange server), so it won't force the system to use virtual memory. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory It does matter in that he was responding to the level of service pack Martin suggested. If you must, at least jump all over him when he's actually wrong. Not really addressed to you, Roger. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory I think it will stop after 3GB. -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: STORE.EXE loves memory
I meant Johnny, not Andrey.. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini Sent: 17 November 2002 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Since no one bothered to actually answer the question, I'll give it a try. Andrey, if you're using Exchange 2000, the memory munching is by design. STORE.EXE takes up as much available physical RAM as possible to cache mailboxes and speed up access. We have 1.2Gb in our Exch, and Store.exe's usage hovers around 800mb. This is completely normal. Also, it will (should) automatically reduce its memory utilization when other applications start needing it (eg. Backup jobs, opening of software or large admin tools on the exchange server), so it won't force the system to use virtual memory. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 November 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory It does matter in that he was responding to the level of service pack Martin suggested. If you must, at least jump all over him when he's actually wrong. Not really addressed to you, Roger. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions And the simple fact, Precht, is that it doesn't matter. It's a client side, not a server side, fix. And the functionality has existed at least since Outlook 2000 SR1. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Did he mention 5.5 in there? I don't think he did. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory Why SP3 anyhow? SP4 is where you need to be. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE loves memory I think it will stop after 3GB. -Original Message- From: Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE loves memory Hi everyone. I have just rolled out exchange and I'm finding the store.exe process is slowly eating all memory. I have exchange SP3 on this machine and I tried the registry fix Microsoft suggests that deals with an excessive amount of threads and its still not under control. Is there anything else I can do. I'm putting in more memory into the server but I assume it will only eat that too! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Suppressing the envelope
Why is it showing the envelope icon multiple times? That should only show up to the respective Terminal Services user. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 11:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suppressing the envelope I've looked for this off and on an never had any luck finding it. Now we have an application server that is being shared, and folks are complaining that the envelop icon is appearing multiple times when they use Outlook via this server. Here's the question: Is there some way to suppress the envelope icon that shows up in the task bar when new mail comes in? Many thanks! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images 601 N. 34th Street Seattle, WA 98103 Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche
RE: Comp Time Question
Same here... Works like that for all our company actually, not just techs. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:bms;hawaiilawyer.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 10:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here I'm on salary and don't get any extra money for time worked outside normal business hours, but it does buy me a lot of flexibility with my schedule. If I stay late working on something they don't give me grief if I sleep in the next day and come in a couple hours late; or leave early. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advice on infrastructure design
posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS 70GB and growing....
: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
Not directly the boot process.. Just files in the root of C:. Mind you, your [1] is still a valid point... -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 October 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Let's see... This version will break the boot process of the OS[1]. Some versions of Groupshield 4 were documented to delete, without recourse, non-Virus infected (and often straight plain text) email from Exchange. Why do people continue to buy this product? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA [1] Can anyone explain to me WTF its doing touching anything involving the boot process? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Here is a MS KB article on it: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q319011; -Mike -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Elaborate: I called McAfee about the product once for help with a problem, they charged us for the help then transferred us. The next guy that came on the phone said that the product was no longer supported. We had tons of problems with it, service was always stopping, updates we slow coming when compared to other products, tons of technical problem. we dumped it. We are running Symantec no, no problems. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 or GFI? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 How about Sybari or Trend? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 HA! I know, I get grief from people all the time over it, but its my only choice right now until I can get NAV implemented. -- From: Andy David Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 4, 2002 10:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Ah! Groupshield! I'm melting... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Anyone ever have problems with McAfee GSE 5.2 and it not being able to open the private information store? I get the following error in Event Viewer: McAfee GroupShield Exchange failed to open private message store. Then I also get this error: Alert Manager Event Log Alert: An internal error occurred in Groupshield - please check the log for details.(from ServerName Serial# 3) IP IPAddress user SYSTEM running GroupShield 5.20.664.0 odcmd) I have defragged the private store and I have uninstalled/reinstalled GSE but I cannot figure
RE: W32/Bugbear@MM - No File Attachment
We run GS 5. AFAIK, we don't have these problems. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 October 2002 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W32/Bugbear@MM - No File Attachment Dear DL Members, At Wawa, on the Exchange Servers, we are running GroupShield 4.0.4. The Scan Engine (4160) and DAT files (4227) are up to date. GroupShield is detecting and quarantining the W32/Bugbear@MM virus, as long as the infected e-mail message has an actual file attachment. If the infected e-mail message does not have a file attachment, GroupShield is not detecting it, thus we have some PCs and Laptops that get infected, and our Network Printers and Shared Printers print off over 100 pages of garbled text. Common to these e-mail messages with not files attachments is, they are all HTML (as opposed to Rich Text or Plain Text). Is anyone else with GroupShield experiencing this problem? What are you doing, to the Exchange Servers, to fix this? I can open these e-mail messages from my Laptop, which has the latest version of the Scan Engine and DAT files, without getting infected. Having the client Scan Engine and DAT files is a solution, and we are working on it. Let me know. Thanks. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
For WebShield: SolutionID nai12092 SolutionID nai16437 For Groupshield 5.0: SolutionID nai24822 It's documented, it's fixed, but you must contact NAI to get hold of it, which I did about 2 weeks ago, and they never got back to me. Sorry for the tone, but I'd rather be called wild and irresponsible on a dancefloor than in a forum. -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 October 2002 2:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 I could not let this one pass. For the record, you better take a closer look at how you have installed Exchange and GroupShield and how things are managed in your network. Particularly if your description below is accurate. First off, why isn't your boot.ini read only? It is supposed to be. Second, why isn't your OS defaulting to the c:\winnt if the boot.ini can not be found, it is supposed to. Perhaps you installed to a non-default directory, that would be a good reason. Third, I've been using GroupShield 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 on numerous systems at several companies. Updates have failed many times and I have encountered many different annoying bugs, but never has it done even close to what you described below. Before you start making software changes and decisions, I suggest you re-evaluate your current management models and trouble shooting techniques first. Sorry for the terse tone, but there are many people new to this area reading these posts, and wild, irresponsible statements like below do not help others develop a professional edge. As far as what is best, as Andy David said, use what works for you. It all comes down to preferences on bugs and features. None of them are perfect, everyone has a different experience for each one. Test several, see what addresses the most of what you need and expect. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 18:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 I'll have a look at trend... Thanks for the info. For the record, we DID have an issue with Groupshield, and this goes out to ALL GROUPSHIELD USERS. There is a bug in Groupshield when used on an Exchange 2000 server. If the internet update fails (something quite normal as it's done daily over FTP, so it's bound to fail), it DELETES ALL NON-READ-ONLY FILES IN THE ROOT OF C:! That includes BOOT.INI. It happened to us twice on a live system, and once on a test system! Windows simply complains that it can't find NTOSKRNL.EXE and stops booting... We had to boot with the Win2K CD into the Recovery Console and manually copy a boot.ini file from another (similar) server to get it back up... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 11:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Heck, if it works for you and you have had success with it, stick with it. I have had bad experiences with McCrappy, and the upgrade price to the e-policy thing was more than just simply switching to Trend, with I really like. Ive also used Antigen, Symantec and ImNotGoingToScanIT, and of those , I have found Trend and Sybari the best, an opinion shared by many. BTW, once I switched to Trend, I rescanned and found viruses that McCrappy missed. YMMV. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject
RE: Microsoft's new OS
Phew... I was already planning to sue MS for taking all our monkeys... :-P -Original Message- From: Melanie Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 October 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Microsoft's new OS This is not a real site.if you read it you can see it's a joke Melanie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Microsoft's new OS Importance: High Check this site out www.mslinux.org New Linux OS from Microsoft _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 or GFI? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 How about Sybari or Trend? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 HA! I know, I get grief from people all the time over it, but its my only choice right now until I can get NAV implemented. -- From: Andy David Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 4, 2002 10:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Ah! Groupshield! I'm melting... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Anyone ever have problems with McAfee GSE 5.2 and it not being able to open the private information store? I get the following error in Event Viewer: McAfee GroupShield Exchange failed to open private message store. Then I also get this error: Alert Manager Event Log Alert: An internal error occurred in Groupshield - please check the log for details.(from ServerName Serial# 3) IP IPAddress user SYSTEM running GroupShield 5.20.664.0 odcmd) I have defragged the private store and I have uninstalled/reinstalled GSE but I cannot figure out why this is happening. Any help is appreciated. ~!M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. === === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
I'll have a look at trend... Thanks for the info. For the record, we DID have an issue with Groupshield, and this goes out to ALL GROUPSHIELD USERS. There is a bug in Groupshield when used on an Exchange 2000 server. If the internet update fails (something quite normal as it's done daily over FTP, so it's bound to fail), it DELETES ALL NON-READ-ONLY FILES IN THE ROOT OF C:! That includes BOOT.INI. It happened to us twice on a live system, and once on a test system! Windows simply complains that it can't find NTOSKRNL.EXE and stops booting... We had to boot with the Win2K CD into the Recovery Console and manually copy a boot.ini file from another (similar) server to get it back up... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 11:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Heck, if it works for you and you have had success with it, stick with it. I have had bad experiences with McCrappy, and the upgrade price to the e-policy thing was more than just simply switching to Trend, with I really like. Ive also used Antigen, Symantec and ImNotGoingToScanIT, and of those , I have found Trend and Sybari the best, an opinion shared by many. BTW, once I switched to Trend, I rescanned and found viruses that McCrappy missed. YMMV. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 or GFI? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 How about Sybari or Trend? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 HA! I know, I get grief from people all the time over it, but its my only choice right now until I can get NAV implemented. -- From: Andy David Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 4, 2002 10:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Ah! Groupshield! I'm melting... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Anyone ever have problems with McAfee GSE 5.2 and it not being able to open the private information store? I get the following error in Event Viewer: McAfee GroupShield Exchange failed to open private message store. Then I also get this error: Alert Manager Event Log Alert: An internal error occurred in Groupshield - please check the log for details.(from ServerName Serial# 3) IP IPAddress user SYSTEM running GroupShield 5.20.664.0 odcmd) I have defragged the private store and I have uninstalled/reinstalled GSE but I cannot figure out why this is happening. Any help is appreciated. ~!M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- The information contained in this email message
RE: New Exchange Server
I know, but that's not a valid reason for dropping raid.. I would say identify where the problem was (if it was a bad card, bad drivers or just an unrelated crash), and fix it. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Andrea, I do believe though he said that... 'I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. ' IE he had it on Raid 1 and it still failed (don't know why probably because of a problem with the Raid1 hardware/BIOS or it was the ID0 drive in the mirror? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 15:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Picture this: Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange. If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive. But now let's look at RAID1 swap: One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server I would still try to find a way to put page file
RE: New Exchange Server
If you were referring to me, I'll show you my willy... Regards _MR._ Andrea Coppini -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 7:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Maybe you should look into getting a better RAID controller. Her theory is right. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Andrea, Please let me disagree. All I have to do is boot without the crashed page drive. Windows will create a temp page file on the C: drive and start (just confirmed this with my hardware guys). Then when time allows, the replacement drive can be added and the page file moved to it, with all the necessary reboots. I also disagree about the 0% downtime according to your scenario #2. Based on my experience, as soon as RAID failed on the page file volume, the server did a blue screen of death. So much for 0% downtime. *In theory* the server *should* have kept running. But it did not. So screw it. If it is going to crash anyway I am not going to spend extra money on it. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Picture this: Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange. If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive. But now let's look at RAID1 swap: One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange
RE: New Exchange Server
The ideal config is as follows 2 Drives, RAID1, OS 2 Drives, RAID1, Logs 3 or more drives, RAID5 (or 1+0 if you have enough drives), Stores Not everyone has the luxury of so many drives. I have 2 drives in RAID1 for OS and Logs, and 4 in a RAID5 for the Store. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange Server I am in the process of building a new Exchange server and I have been trying to keep up with the post about configuration, but I will ask again. What is the proper hard drive configuration for setting up a new Exchange 2000 box for about 150 users? On which partition should I put the OS, the database etc. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another reason to be careful with OWA and URLSCAN
Stop HR from recruiting anyone with a blocked surname. Eg. John Pol, Mark Vbs, Michael Com, etc... -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 8:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Another reason to be careful with OWA and URLSCAN I've seen URLScan fail when a user who's last name was POL to allow this user to open up his mailbox. POL is an extension that is normally blocked. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Tom.Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:39 PM Subject: Another reason to be careful with OWA and URLSCAN URLSCAN is a great tool. It helps secure your web server. If you use the Outlook Web Access template when installing URLSCAN you should be good to go, right? WRONG! URLSCAN wreaks havoc with OWA. First, remember that with OWA the SUBJECT line of a mail message is the FILE NAME. So if you are logged into OWA and want to read a message with subject: I want to hold your hand Your browser sends a URL like the following htps:/servername/username/inbox/i%20want%20to%20hold%your%20hand.eml URLSCAN examines that URL to make sure it isn't evil. Looks good so far. If the subject is: I want to hold your hand. The url would be htps:/servername/username/inbox/i%20want%20to%20hold%your%20hand..eml Since there are two dots (..) URLSCAN Rejects it. And if the subject is: I want to hold your hand foot The URL would be htps:/servername/username/inbox/i%20want%20to%20hold%your%20hand%20%26%2 0foo t.eml Since there is an (or hex 26) URLSCAN Rejects it. Now how common is a period at the end of a subject in email? How common is the perfectly RFC822 legal in the subject of a message? There are truly good reasons to reject those chars/patterns as URL's, but they are allowed as file names. So do you a) lower the security of your webserver by disabling those features of URLSCAN? b) convince everyone to not end their subjects with a period or use the symbol? hm, what were the OWA guys thinking (or smoking?) when they set up the URL's to be based on subject lines??? Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA from a client behind FW
Thanks for the Q, but these servers (or the clients) are not behind a proxy. Apparently it's an ISP issue. A colleague of mine tried it from his home Cable connection (which is on the same ISP as the office) and he had the same problems. I tried it using my home ADSL connection (different ISP) and it was fine. Spooky... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW Check this: Q290177 -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA from a client behind FW Hi, We are running an Exch 2k server with no problems. One of our users needs to access another OWA 2k server (of his previous company) from within our LAN, and he can log in just fine, but for example if he goes to his inbox, the e-mail list pane gets stuck on 'Loading'... And never loads anything. He has tried connecting to this same account using a dial-up and that works fine. What could the problem be? Also, is there someone nice enough to create an Exch 2k mailbox which I can access via OWA to see if it is indeed a problem on our end. I only need a couple of e-mails in there to see if mails show up. Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA from a client behind FW
Thanks for the Q, however I checked and I do have English-United Kingdom set as a language in IE. Coincidentally, the 2 servers I tested are both in the UK. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA from a client behind FW Try this if it applies. Q315515 - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:42 AM Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW There is a Microsoft KB article on just that. Can't remember the number. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA from a client behind FW Hi, We are running an Exch 2k server with no problems. One of our users needs to access another OWA 2k server (of his previous company) from within our LAN, and he can log in just fine, but for example if he goes to his inbox, the e-mail list pane gets stuck on 'Loading'... And never loads anything. He has tried connecting to this same account using a dial-up and that works fine. What could the problem be? Also, is there someone nice enough to create an Exch 2k mailbox which I can access via OWA to see if it is indeed a problem on our end. I only need a couple of e-mails in there to see if mails show up. Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA from a client behind FW - SOLVED
The problem has been solved. It was an ISP issue. They had blocked any non-HTTP traffic which tries to pass through port 80, and this blocked OWA since it uses this data. Don't have any more info about it though... -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini Sent: 02 October 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW Thanks for the Q, however I checked and I do have English-United Kingdom set as a language in IE. Coincidentally, the 2 servers I tested are both in the UK. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA from a client behind FW Try this if it applies. Q315515 - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:42 AM Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW There is a Microsoft KB article on just that. Can't remember the number. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA from a client behind FW Hi, We are running an Exch 2k server with no problems. One of our users needs to access another OWA 2k server (of his previous company) from within our LAN, and he can log in just fine, but for example if he goes to his inbox, the e-mail list pane gets stuck on 'Loading'... And never loads anything. He has tried connecting to this same account using a dial-up and that works fine. What could the problem be? Also, is there someone nice enough to create an Exch 2k mailbox which I can access via OWA to see if it is indeed a problem on our end. I only need a couple of e-mails in there to see if mails show up. Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet
400% disk utilization!
I've been using PerfMon for a while today to monitor our Exchange 2k server. Every so often, for no apparent reason, %disk time for disk 1 (E:) goes up to 100% and stays there for a good 30 seconds. Disk 0 (C:,D:) stays low. I tried doing an Advanced find for some text in all my mailbox, but %disk time fluctuates around 90%... It never stays steady at 100%. Also, looking at the statistics under the perfmon graph, I noticed that it showed 415 as the Maximum... Any idea what could be causing this? Here's a few specs: C,D = single SCSI RAID5 set 3x 10,000rpm 36gb Disks, storing system on C:, transaction logs on D: E: = single SCSI RAID5 set 3x 10,000rpm 36gb disks, storing IS. 1.2gb RAM Single P3-700 CPU HP Netserver LC2000r machine. One concern that I have is that both RAID5 sets are on the same SCSI bus (we weren't supplied with the necessary cable and split backplane when we initially installed the server). Would this affect it? Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA from a client behind FW
Hi, We are running an Exch 2k server with no problems. One of our users needs to access another OWA 2k server (of his previous company) from within our LAN, and he can log in just fine, but for example if he goes to his inbox, the e-mail list pane gets stuck on 'Loading'... And never loads anything. He has tried connecting to this same account using a dial-up and that works fine. What could the problem be? Also, is there someone nice enough to create an Exch 2k mailbox which I can access via OWA to see if it is indeed a problem on our end. I only need a couple of e-mails in there to see if mails show up. Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA from a client behind FW
I actually thought about that too, I will have to ask the other company's net admins about their setup and compare. I have a 3 192.168.x.x subnets which are routed internally. But if it was a routing problem, nothing would work, no? In this particular case, the user gets past the logon screen and sees the list of folders in his mailbox, but he can't get the list of what's INSIDE those folders (ie. The e-mail list or the calender items). -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW What kind of NAT scheme are you running? Perhaps that conflicts with their access list. Perhaps it routes screwy if both companies have the same subnets in place. RAS works because he's either got an ISP address or he's dialing directly into that network. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Coppini Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 6:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA from a client behind FW Hi, We are running an Exch 2k server with no problems. One of our users needs to access another OWA 2k server (of his previous company) from within our LAN, and he can log in just fine, but for example if he goes to his inbox, the e-mail list pane gets stuck on 'Loading'... And never loads anything. He has tried connecting to this same account using a dial-up and that works fine. What could the problem be? Also, is there someone nice enough to create an Exch 2k mailbox which I can access via OWA to see if it is indeed a problem on our end. I only need a couple of e-mails in there to see if mails show up. Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 400% disk utilization!
Every so often = around every 1 or 2 minutes. I found out it was the transaction log. Transaction and IS were both on drive E: (not as per my first e-mail). So I moved the transaction logs to drive d: and it's been fine since. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 400% disk utilization! What does every so often mean. Is there antivirus software running? - Original Message - From: Andrea Coppini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:07 AM Subject: 400% disk utilization! I've been using PerfMon for a while today to monitor our Exchange 2k server. Every so often, for no apparent reason, %disk time for disk 1 (E:) goes up to 100% and stays there for a good 30 seconds. Disk 0 (C:,D:) stays low. I tried doing an Advanced find for some text in all my mailbox, but %disk time fluctuates around 90%... It never stays steady at 100%. Also, looking at the statistics under the perfmon graph, I noticed that it showed 415 as the Maximum... Any idea what could be causing this? Here's a few specs: C,D = single SCSI RAID5 set 3x 10,000rpm 36gb Disks, storing system on C:, transaction logs on D: E: = single SCSI RAID5 set 3x 10,000rpm 36gb disks, storing IS. 1.2gb RAM Single P3-700 CPU HP Netserver LC2000r machine. One concern that I have is that both RAID5 sets are on the same SCSI bus (we weren't supplied with the necessary cable and split backplane when we initially installed the server). Would this affect it? Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax
Hi, I have noticed that if I have a contact which has its e-mail address field and Fax field entered, it will show up 2 choices. Name Surname (E-Mail) and Name Surname (Business Fax). I guess the idea is to send an e-mail directly to the guy's fax machine... We use the Netmoves fax service, where we basically compose an e-mail with the text/attachments that we want to come out of the recipients fax machine, and we send it to [RECIPIENT_FAX_NUMBER]@netmoves.com. Netmoves converts this to a standard fax and sends it to the fax number as specified in the userid portion of the e-mail address. Can we use this Outlook/Exchange feature which brings up this Name Surname (Business Fax) to automatically send it to [BUSINESS_FAX]@netmoves.com? Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
And they're complaining? Bloody users, they're never happy :-) The 'problem' might be because they're accessing OWA using http://[SERVERNAME]/exchange (NTLM) instead of http://server.domain.com/exchnage (by FQDN) or http://1.2.3.4/exchange (by IP), this causes IE to authenticate using the current user/pass logged on to windows... It's actually a feature... -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ r�zrmyzr污vi Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
1 Are they running Windows NT/2000/XP or 9x/Me as part of the domain? 2 Are they part of the same Win2K domain/forest as the Exch 2k server? or Are their login credentials (login pass) with which they log in to the PC the same as their Exch 2k login/pass? 3 do they access the server by typing \\SERVERNAME\EXCHANGE or do they access the server by typing \\servername.domain.com\exchange and 'domain.com' is part of their Internet Explorer 'Trusted Sites' list? If you answered yes to all 3 questions, you have found your 'problem'. Although I still can't understand why they're complaining... -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they authenticate is when they log into their email. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain first? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ r�zrmyzr⹅vi +x )r뺷Ƚ˶ zǭȱr: ˱m[yz[)r vhV+i̞ٞG +x ꫢ)r뺷Ƚ˶ ёzǭȱr:➞˱m椠[y敤z[)r≉ vh▖+i̞ٞG Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
I guess, what probably happened then is that once upon a time, your users checked the 'Save this password in your password list' and it saved it Delete any .PWL files you find. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them are having problems. Somewhere in Windows or IE it is keeping tabs on the last person that logged in so when you click on the shortcut it automatically logs them in. Right now I have two shortcuts pointing to the mailbox directly via https://server/exchange/mailbox. This makes it so they can get into both boxes but the last user that logged in still doesn't have to enter a username or password. I hope this enlightens you or maybe someone has seen this before. The client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0 Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Undeliverables
Hi, How do I configure a mailbox to be the 'postmaster' mailbox (ie. Any e-mail destined to one of the local domains where the user is not found is sent to mailbox A.) I found Q324021, but looks complex, prone to errors, and (I think) will need to be modified anytime we add/remove local domains from the exch. Server. Any ideas? Andy Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: *groan* PST Files
Implement strict mailbox quotas. Block GIF, JPG, MP*, AVI and other multimedia files. Do not allow e-mails larger than 5Mb to be anywhere in your information store. Teach users to use file shares rather than e-mail to send stuff across. And one last thing, implement this policy throughout your organisation Teach the boss that no matter how much he shouts and threatens, Exchange server will still have a 16gb limitation, which will shout back at him if he insists on sending/receiving child-porn/car photos/yacht layout diagrams In other words, be ruthless...until the money comes in for an upgrade.. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 September 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: *groan* PST Files As it seems that you do actually need large email stores to archive mail which presumably needs to be reliably stored so you can actually get it back (or else whats the point of bothering to archive it?), what business functionality would moving them from a nice reliable easy to back up and manage exchange database store to a unreliable, difficult to control and backup PST file? I'm not a fan of shuffling stuff around between different file stores to be honest, it is at best a short term solution that won't solve your actual problem. -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu 19/09/2002 10:02 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: *groan* PST Files Hi. Standard Version of EX5.5, SP4. 200+ users. We are looking at educating users in not storing everything in their email, but storing in either a .pst or .ost. Money is an issue, my company won't pay for us to upgrade to 5.5 Enterprise or Exchange 2K, so there's no option IMO other than educate the packrats, and set up an archiving solution. I've also read the arguments in the FAQ, but wonder what other folks in a similar situation would do, with regard to archiving. Currently our priv.edb is 13.9 GB, while the pub.edb is 226MB, so would archiving essential emails on Public folders be a reasonable idea? Some of our client handlers need to keep archives for some of our clients, in case of compliance issues. Jon * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +--xm ,)r(ື \b=!6 0 zǚ1r䀬:.˛ m隊[hy㞄\z[,䔀)rɄZ Zvh쀧+-i٢2뮞G( Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: OWA 2000 Logon field..
Is it that complicated? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2002 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Logon field.. I know a couple of talented developers who'd likely have time to work on such a project after MEC. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 2000 Logon field.. Hi all, I believe this has been asked before. I searched through the archives but I couldn't find it... Basically I need to have an OWA 5.5 style logon box so users can enter their mailbox alias. I need it because some users have multiple mailboxes associated to them. I know I can use http://[exchange.ip]/exchange/[alias_name], but the users won't remember. Any ideas? Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Undeliverable
Do you really want to do that? I wouldn't bring it down to a few hours. As far as I know the accepted standard is 48 hours, bare minimum is 24 hours, since SMTP tends to have amongst the lowest precedence on the internet. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undeliverable Internet Mail Service / Connections tab / Time-outs button. Neil -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 30 August 2002 00:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Undeliverable Subject: Undeliverable Hi Everyone, One of our staff has just received an Undeliverable notification re an external e-mail that was sent 3 days ago. I'm just wondering where the settings for the delivery timeout and notifications are buried. I'd like to set notifications re undeliverable e-mail to alert users within a couple of hours of delivery failure. I'm running Exchange 5.5 on a 2K Server box. Regards Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Bandwidth Recommendation
I don't know frame, but keep in mind that outlook/exchange is heavily transaction based, so make sure the latency is low. We had around 10 users on a 128k ISDN link (this was dedicated to Exchange traffic only), and it was horridly slow... You might also want to educate the users to work offline and synchronize eg every 10-15 minutes, that's what we did and it improved slightly. -Original Message- From: ed Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Bandwidth Recommendation Howdy All! Our Network Team is looking for Outlook 2000/2002 bandwidth recommendation for our remote sites. The users are light mail users and will be homed on Exchange 2000. The sites are connected over a 384K frame circuit with 30-40 users. _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error 0X8004010F
I have SP2 installed (other users are a combination of SP1 and no SPs). I tried removing any OAB files I found, but I still get the error.. Any more ideas? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 August 2002 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error 0X8004010F Its just a fluke. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error 0X8004010F I can't keep up. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error 0X8004010F Or perhaps XP Sp2 which is out now :) -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error 0X8004010F I would have your users delete or rename all of their *.oab files on their hard disk and download the Address book again. I have been having quite a few offline file problems with XP. Maybe Office XP SP1 will resolve some of these issues. I dunno yet. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error 0X8004010F Hi all, I'm migrating to Exch 2K. Since I joined the new 2k to the old 5.5, all Outlook XP users (including myself) have been getting the following error: Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0X8004010F) : 'The operation failed. An object could not be found. I came across a very helpful knowledgebase article: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q273364 Any more helpful ideas (possibly with a solution)? Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
IM not connecting
Hi gurus, I'm (still) setting up a new Exchange 2k server to migrate our existing 5.5 server. Everything's working fine, BUT IM. I have created (and recreated around 20 times by now) an IM virtual server, installed IM client, checked the DNS entries, etc. as per microsoft step-by-step documentation... I have installed IM client on the Exchange server itself (to avoid routing/port/firewall issues). But I keep getting the 'Sign In To Exchange' dialog box telling me that The person logged on to this computer does not have permission to use the specified e-mail address. Please type your e-mail address and password asking me for my E-Mail, Username, Password and Domain. I'm logged in as myself, and I'm a Schema/Domain/Enterprise admin. I'm trying to connect using my own IM account. Any ideas? Thanks Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Exchange 2000 Server - Recommendations
Hi gurus, I'm installing a brand new Exchange 2000 server to migrate our present Exch 5.5 mailboxes onto. This will be part of a new Win2K domain (which is already up and running). Q1: Shall I set up the server as a DC so it won't have to constantly verify credentials against the existing DC server? I know there is no need for Exchange 2k to run on a DC, but what is your opinion? Exch 2k on Win2K DC or Exch 2k on Win2k Member Server? Q2: Service Packs: Right now all my Win2k servers are happily running SP2, shall I install Win2k SP3 on this new server straight away or stick with SP2? Also, which Exch 2k SP would you recommend installing? Thanks Regards Andy Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K migration to new domain question?
We went for Users first, mailboxes later... -Original Message- From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 August 2002 5:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K migration to new domain question? Which first? Users, or mailboxes from old Exchange 5.5 server? Having a full trust between my NT4 and W2K domains, I would like to migrate all users from the old NT4 domain to the W2K domain. New servers are in place for E2K. What should be done first... migrate user accounts, or move the mailboxes to the new E2K servers? What gotchas to look out for? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.5 2000 Mailboxes
Hi all, I'm new in here, please be gentle... I'm running a Win5.5 server in a WinNT domain. We have migrated the users to a new Win2K domain (done that manually) and are now planning to migrate to Exch 2k. There is a 2-way trust between the NT and the 2K domain. My main problem is the assignments of mailboxes. In 5.5 you could simply click 'Primary NT Account' and choose which NT account you want to associate the mailbox with. From what I could gather, in Win2k you must make sure that the Primary NT account in 5.5 is set to the respective username in Win2K, before you run ADC. Failure to do so will create a new Win2K disabled user account with the mailbox attached to it. This is where my question lies. If, for example, I skip 1 or 2 mailboxes and forget to change their primary NT account to the Win2K user, and run ADC, and the little prick will create disabled user accounts in 2K and assign the mailboxes to them. HOW can I 'reassign' the mailbox to the REAL Win2K user account? I'm ready to purchase any admin tools since System Manager, to say the least, sucks. Mr. Andrea Coppini (+356) 79 263732 [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
