owa issues
Getting a double login prompt from an external XP machine. On site when you go to OWA it only asks you to login once, but off site with this winxp machine it is asking for a double login. Tested with a win2k machine off site and it seemed to work with only one login. Went to ms site and couldn't find anything I was doing wrong? Any help would be amazing. 2nd weird thing is that with the winxp machine the first login allows me to save user id and password, but the 2nd login has the box but even if I check the box and type in my user id and pass it doesn't save it. OWA is accessible though but again with 2 logins. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa issues
The machine is a stand alone not on the domain. It logs in remotely. Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa issues Is the XP machine on the domain? What are your IE security settings for the zone (look at the bottom of the list for settings that say Log on using current password, etc.) -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa issues Getting a double login prompt from an external XP machine. On site when you go to OWA it only asks you to login once, but off site with this winxp machine it is asking for a double login. Tested with a win2k machine off site and it seemed to work with only one login. Went to ms site and couldn't find anything I was doing wrong? Any help would be amazing. 2nd weird thing is that with the winxp machine the first login allows me to save user id and password, but the 2nd login has the box but even if I check the box and type in my user id and pass it doesn't save it. OWA is accessible though but again with 2 logins. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Are you a good one at least? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content You play one in your own mind. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Strange Question
David, So I take it this rule would be set on something like a sender or the importance set on an email? -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I envision a solution like this: Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever) where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto
RE: Strange Question
I think this is the best option thus far. Showed it to him and he seems pleased with it but still can't tell me what he will be using this for. Any way to have this automatically set like every time he sends a message it will automatically include a follow up prompt let's say every 20 minutes after the email is sent? I am beginning to believe my boss is a spammer. Avi -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Have the boss just set the reminder flag for Follow up on the e-mail with the date/time for 20 minutes hence. It should pop up if the other guy is using Outlook. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I envision a solution like this: Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever) where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question
RE: Strange Question
Ed, I appreciate the kind thoughts and straightforward attitude. Believe it or not I used your quote and then he backed himself into a corner and got defensive. Think the flag for follow up will make him happy though. Avs -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Just tell him no. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange Question
My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
I am loving this. I think I will put together a nice document for him. Avi -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Question Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Question Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
The fact that the two parties consented to this. Please don't get me wrong, I am completely in agreement with what the Great Crowley says about behavioral issues and all of that, just following up for the boss. Avi -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message - Junk E-mail - Add to Junk Senders? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Question Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Strange Question
I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I envision a solution like this: Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever) where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Question Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ
RE: Strange Question
Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I envision a solution like this: Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever) where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Question Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
RE: Strange Question
All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further. Avi -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions I envision a solution like this: Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever) where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? Can we go to mount Splashmore? -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message
RE: Filtering
You are correct there. Small Business Server with Exchange 2k Avs -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering Nice, but Avi's using Exchange 2000 since he mentioned 'Exchange System Manager' ;-) Neil -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 28 May 2003 15:12 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Filtering Subject: RE: Filtering Avi, 1. Start up Regedt32.exe. 2. Open up your list in Notepad and copy it. 3. Go to HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Parameters. 4. Double-click the TurfTable entry on the right hand side to open it up. 5. Paste your entire list in there, click ok. 6. Close out of Regedt32.exe, Stop/Start your Internet Mail Service service and you're done. Jim -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Filtering I am having a lot of spamming issues and nobody is interested in purchasing a spam helping product. Wanted to know if anyone knows how to mass load a list of known spammers and/or spamming domains to the filtering tab of the exchange system manager - Message Delivery Properties? When I do add some sites it seems to work great but I have compiled a large list now (also with some help from a new found friend) and hope I do not have to copy and paste each in one at a time. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Filtering
But can you just copy paste to it as well? I don't code, even a little bit, nor do I ever care to. Avi -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Filtering It's simply a multi-valued attribute in AD; it's fairly easy to write code to import/export this - check out the link below as an example. http://www.cdolive.net/download/Exchange2000MessageFilterList.zip Neil -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 28 May 2003 12:39 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Filtering Subject: Filtering I am having a lot of spamming issues and nobody is interested in purchasing a spam helping product. Wanted to know if anyone knows how to mass load a list of known spammers and/or spamming domains to the filtering tab of the exchange system manager - Message Delivery Properties? When I do add some sites it seems to work great but I have compiled a large list now (also with some help from a new found friend) and hope I do not have to copy and paste each in one at a time. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filtering
I am having a lot of spamming issues and nobody is interested in purchasing a spam helping product. Wanted to know if anyone knows how to mass load a list of known spammers and/or spamming domains to the filtering tab of the exchange system manager - Message Delivery Properties? When I do add some sites it seems to work great but I have compiled a large list now (also with some help from a new found friend) and hope I do not have to copy and paste each in one at a time. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Failed delivery
I thought you can only use a dnr on ER? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Failed delivery Perhaps if you posted a sample DNR... On 2/27/03 8:49, Watkins V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, We have a situation where exchange 5.5 users are subscribed to a list as supplied by a unix listmanager. When a message is sent to this list, there are 240 members, there always seem to be a number of failures, which appear to be random. Any ideas why? I have looked for events in the logs after switching on all logging for mta, is, transport etc, but nothing useful. They are not over their mailbox limit, they do not all have inbox rules, so I am baffled. Ex5.5 sp4 plus fixes, NT 4etc thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How do you get a hardcopy list?
How would you set up mailing labels off of your contact list? Or would exchange using outlook not be a good place to do this from? Avi -Original Message- From: Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How do you get a hardcopy list? I've had great success with this: http://www.uwsp.edu/it/exchange/client_ext/export/export.html This is what it does: * Installs itself into the Tools menu, under Customize Toolbar. * Allows exporting of Distribution List members, from any available container, to a message which is put in your Inbox. * Allows exporting of mailbox properties (e.g., address, description, etc.) to a message which is put in your Inbox. * Both Distribution List export and mailbox property export can be added to a customized toolbar. You can then take that result, print it out, email it to someone else, etc.. Joe -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How do you get a hardcopy list? Export the list using directory export specifying the Members field. Note, however, the names will show in their X500 notation. Such a utility could be scripted. Perhaps something already exists on http://www.cdolive.com or http://www.slipstick.com. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How do you get a hardcopy list? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4 How do you get a hardcopy list of the names in a distribution list? I have tried everything I could, and could not get it. Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Statement The information contained in this electronic message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the owner of the email address listed as the recipient of this message. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at 504-586-1200 and return the original message to us at McGlinchey Stafford*643 Magazine St.*New Orleans,*LA*70130 via the United States Postal Service. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How do you get a hardcopy list?
Ouch. Any thoughts on other applications and/or whatnot to use? I created an access database to do it, but would like to find something off the shelf easier to use? Avi -Original Message- From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: How do you get a hardcopy list? you can do a Mail Merge in Word, using your Outlook Contacts as a data source. Unfortunately, Word's Mail Merge feature is one of its least user-friendly, and the Wizard in Office XP isn't much better. Also, last I checked Word is pulling an address book, so you'll have to have the Outlook Address Book set up and looking at the Contacts as an address book (which I believe is part of a default install anyway.) -Patrick R. Sweeney http://boston.craigslist.org/bos/res/8484283.html - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 8:18 AM Subject: RE: How do you get a hardcopy list? How would you set up mailing labels off of your contact list? Or would exchange using outlook not be a good place to do this from? Avi -Original Message- From: Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How do you get a hardcopy list? I've had great success with this: http://www.uwsp.edu/it/exchange/client_ext/export/export.html This is what it does: * Installs itself into the Tools menu, under Customize Toolbar. * Allows exporting of Distribution List members, from any available container, to a message which is put in your Inbox. * Allows exporting of mailbox properties (e.g., address, description, etc.) to a message which is put in your Inbox. * Both Distribution List export and mailbox property export can be added to a customized toolbar. You can then take that result, print it out, email it to someone else, etc.. Joe -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How do you get a hardcopy list? Export the list using directory export specifying the Members field. Note, however, the names will show in their X500 notation. Such a utility could be scripted. Perhaps something already exists on http://www.cdolive.com or http://www.slipstick.com. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How do you get a hardcopy list? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4 How do you get a hardcopy list of the names in a distribution list? I have tried everything I could, and could not get it. Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Statement The information contained in this electronic message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the owner of the email address listed as the recipient of this message. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at 504-586-1200 and return the original message to us at McGlinchey Stafford*643 Magazine St.*New Orleans,*LA*70130 via the United States Postal Service. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Exchange 2000 books
one minute manager -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 books http://www.wiredeuclid.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=booksfile=indexreq= view_subcatsid=3 (link might wrap) That's the list of books that consistently get recommended here and in other forums. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 books Hi all, I am looking for a good book for Exchange 2000. Anybody with a good sugestion? Thanks, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sp3 revisited
Service packs are most always cumulative, most, if not all of the time. That is except during leap years. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Office XP, that is. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited MS Office SP2 requires SP1... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited My thoughts exactly. Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth? But seriously, yes. Service packs are - and always have been, to my knowledge - cumulative. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: sp3 revisited So you think the release notes are lying? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sp3 revisited ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth' thanks Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Public folders are missing in OWA.
my fix wasn't as easy. talked with pss and they gave me a patch which fixed it. congrats on the easy fix though. avi -Original Message- From: Jason Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folders are missing in OWA. Nevermind... I figured it out. The following fixed the issue. - open 'System Manager' - open 'http-protocol' under your server - open 'properties' of the folder 'public' - under 'Access' click the button 'Authentication' - fill in the 'default domain name' -Original Message- From: Jason Brown Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 7:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folders are missing in OWA. OWA users remotely logon to a Front-end Exchange 2k server. If you logon to the back-end then the folders are there? Microsoft says this is a problem when you changed the default IIS port, but I haven't done that? Help would be appreciated. -Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message filtering
Bombay sapphire anyone? -Original Message- From: Tim Tullis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filtering Very Good! Martini's @ Milliways after work? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filtering 42 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filtering 203.199.81.81 -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filtering I do have anti-virus software and it is trapping and quarantining the messages. But that doesn't stop the spoofed email from coming in. I would like to find out the source of the infection - who is the user who has been infected. Can I tell from the message header attached below ? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message filtering First I'd change my DL SMTP addresses to something non-obvious. Then I'd implement an antivirus solution which could be configured to drop worms. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message filtering We're being hit big time by the KLEZ virus. Here is one of the messages that was sent. I've checked everyone's machines and everyone seems clear. So I'm guessing it's someone who works closely with our company as we have emails floating back and forth between staff who claim they never sent each other email. What if I set up the message filtering option on the Internet Mail Connector to block the domain smtp02.vsnl.net and smtp03.vsnl.net since those seem to be the 2 main sources from where the emails are originating. Also, how do I insert the entry ? Do I enter it as @smtp02.vsnl.net ? Received: from smtp02.vsnl.net ([203.197.12.8]) by myserver.mycompany.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange ) id 31VYJYRC; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:14:50 -0400 Received: from Qrvlyi ([203.199.81.81]) by smtp02.vsnl.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GYX8GJ00.Z9D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:49:31 +0530 From: staff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.373 / Virus Database: 208 - Release Date: 7/1/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.373 / Virus Database: 208 - Release Date: 7/1/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Just an upgrade to sp2 can't remember if public folders showed up previously though. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Is this a new install. Did it ever work from the outside. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:57 AM Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Did last night, same issues this morning.. Avi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Reapply SP2. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it. When I try and access OWA I get this error when it comes up: -2147467259 I can click ok to this and then owa opens up, but it opens up without the public folders. So far when I am on site and do : http://machinename/exchange/ I get in with no errors and see the public folders When I am on site and do anything else I get those errors. (i.e. use the internal ip of the machine, or the domain name) When I am off site and go in using anything like http://mail.domainname.com/exchange I get the errors and no public folders Please help me out this is driving me nuts.. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
It seems to be working now doing that internally. Cannot test externally until tonight. What does it all mean thenif it works if you just put in public but when you put in exchange it does everything but the public folders and gives that nice error. Avi -Original Message- From: khopesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up What happens when you try to access the public folders directly, http://machinename/public ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Sounds like a rights issue. But you said it works internally OK but external access is failing. And this all happened after applying SP2. I know in SP2 for E2K there is the ability to hide certain items in OWA using segmentation but I don't think that is the problem because it won't give you errors just hide certain items in OWA. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:04 PM Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Just an upgrade to sp2 can't remember if public folders showed up previously though. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Is this a new install. Did it ever work from the outside. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:57 AM Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Did last night, same issues this morning.. Avi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Reapply SP2. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it. When I try and access OWA I get this error when it comes up: -2147467259 I can click ok to this and then owa opens up, but it opens up without the public folders. So far when I am on site and do : http://machinename/exchange/ I get in with no errors and see the public folders When I am on site and do anything else I get those errors. (i.e. use the internal ip of the machine, or the domain name) When I am off site and go in using anything like http://mail.domainname.com/exchange I get the errors and no public folders Please help me out this is driving me nuts.. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
I have the patch, talked with pss today and they gave it to me, will apply tonight when everyone goes to bed and see what happens. I will reply tomorrow again depending on what happens. Avi -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Try this. http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q313932 - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:54 PM Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up It seems to be working now doing that internally. Cannot test externally until tonight. What does it all mean thenif it works if you just put in public but when you put in exchange it does everything but the public folders and gives that nice error. Avi -Original Message- From: khopesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up What happens when you try to access the public folders directly, http://machinename/public ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Sounds like a rights issue. But you said it works internally OK but external access is failing. And this all happened after applying SP2. I know in SP2 for E2K there is the ability to hide certain items in OWA using segmentation but I don't think that is the problem because it won't give you errors just hide certain items in OWA. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:04 PM Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Just an upgrade to sp2 can't remember if public folders showed up previously though. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Is this a new install. Did it ever work from the outside. - Original Message - From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:57 AM Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Did last night, same issues this morning.. Avi -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Reapply SP2. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it. When I try and access OWA I get this error when it comes up: -2147467259 I can click ok to this and then owa opens up, but it opens up without the public folders. So far when I am on site and do : http://machinename/exchange/ I get in with no errors and see the public folders When I am on site and do anything else I get those errors. (i.e. use the internal ip of the machine, or the domain name) When I am off site and go in using anything like http://mail.domainname.com/exchange I get the errors and no public folders Please help me out this is driving me nuts.. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it. When I try and access OWA I get this error when it comes up: -2147467259 I can click ok to this and then owa opens up, but it opens up without the public folders. So far when I am on site and do : http://machinename/exchange/ I get in with no errors and see the public folders When I am on site and do anything else I get those errors. (i.e. use the internal ip of the machine, or the domain name) When I am off site and go in using anything like http://mail.domainname.com/exchange I get the errors and no public folders Please help me out this is driving me nuts.. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA - Unknown Error -2147467259 when logging on
Hello all. Small Business Server 2k. Just updated Exchange to sp2 and everything is working great, except when a user logs onto OWA the get the error Unknown Error -2147467259 They then click ok and everything works fine from there. Any thoughts on how to get rid of this error? Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Upgrade question
take a bat to the server -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT Upgrade question We're a smaller company( 40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and have been very stable (knock on wood). My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality? I've already tried the additional functionality route, but they're not buying it. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
what is spies like us -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: Are you the Keymaster? There is only Zuul. (2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference) JP -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive...=20 --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday afternoon fun
890 What uppp what is the worst score anyone has gotten? anyone less then 50? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun My hand is sweating and is starting to hurt -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 646 here - Just call me ROOKIE! -- From: Tener, Richard Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 09:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1493 I gotta stop playing this thing -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1176 so far.. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:46 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 576 ... more practise needed ! -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 15:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 950 HA ha!!! the simple games are always the most addictive. jeremy -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Dang my best is 656 I better keep trying. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun I got a distance of 798 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Friday afternoon fun Sorry but this is very addictive http://www.seethru.co.uk/zine/south_coast/helicopter_game.htm Yours, Julian Stone _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: Friday afternoon fun
I need a private office so I can get good at this thing. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun best - 779 worst - 24 (kept hitting that first wall) -- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 890 What uppp what is the worst score anyone has gotten? anyone less then 50? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun My hand is sweating and is starting to hurt -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 646 here - Just call me ROOKIE! -- From: Tener, Richard Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 09:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1493 I gotta stop playing this thing -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1176 so far.. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:46 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 576 ... more practise needed ! -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 15:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 950 HA ha!!! the simple games are always the most addictive. jeremy -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Dang my best is 656 I better keep trying. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun I got a distance of 798 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Friday afternoon fun Sorry but this is very addictive http://www.seethru.co.uk/zine/south_coast/helicopter_game.htm Yours, Julian Stone _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request
RE: Friday afternoon fun
2682 do you have hand cramps? i get tired after 718 -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun now my high is 2682. I am going to see if I can get my pilot's license after work. I will bring in a screen shot of my high score that should be good enough shouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Mine was 20 but that was when I first started and didn't have a clue how to play and didn't feel like reading any further than Click to start. After three times of 20 I figured I better read further. -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 27 -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:20 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Friday afternoon fun Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 890 What uppp what is the worst score anyone has gotten? anyone less then 50? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun My hand is sweating and is starting to hurt -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 646 here - Just call me ROOKIE! -- From: Tener, Richard Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 09:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1493 I gotta stop playing this thing -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1176 so far.. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:46 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 576 ... more practise needed ! -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 15:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 950 HA ha!!! the simple games are always the most addictive. jeremy -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Dang my best is 656 I better keep trying. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun I got a distance of 798 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Friday afternoon fun Sorry but this is very addictive http://www.seethru.co.uk/zine/south_coast/helicopter_game.htm Yours, Julian Stone _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
RE: Outlook XP
which patch? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP OK, I applied that patch...all I can say.. YESMUCH BETTER. Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have) Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Well it's pretty much all around slow. Slow opening attachments, slow selecting multiple messages, slow connecting to other mailboxes. Opening other users folders is slow even on same server. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
PC people have no time for blunts -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I like blunts, too. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I use to think it was my lazy boss. And I was told it was him, but when crap hits the fan its clearly not him, it's broken down by who maintains the product... by choice of the team members. If that sounds ugly or a bad way to run a team, your right. But that is another story. I really liked what James Blunt said. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Who has the ultimate responsibility for the overall functionality of the network? If it's you, you're the boss - change the passwords and tell them to stick it! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Other departments who have the rights to do it. We have argued this to the Nth degree, trust me its beyond all hope. If we change passwords we get chewed out and told to change them back. -Original Message- From: Anderson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How are they joining machines w/o your knowledge? Time to change some passwords. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: AV! a full time job? Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Exchange 2000 SP2 deployment guide
My tech buddy got beat up by a woman. A strong and crude like man-woman. He stands strong and can laugh it off... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SP2 deployment guide hehe. Excellent. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SP2 deployment guide No, just crude and man-like, or something like that... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 4:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SP2 deployment guide Are you making fun of me? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SP2 deployment guide Andy David - Avid Reader since 1996 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 4:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SP2 deployment guide I have always found it handy to be able to read! Andy -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 SP2 deployment guide Might be handy to read :) Martin Tuip - MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 listowner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP2
are you sure that's legal? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP2 If I told you I would have to kill you type thing -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP2 Those that really know have all signed NDA's. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP2 Tease -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange SP2 I heard today. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Tony Hlabse| || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/02/2001 09:27 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Exchange SP2 | --- | It was announced by MS on there site but haven't seen anything on a release date. Anybody know of when? I have an enhancement. I am looking for th Logon/Logoff button for OWA that is promised. I have lazy users. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange SP2
fair enough for me ! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP2 Sure. They signed the contract under threat of death, -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP2 are you sure that's legal? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP2 If I told you I would have to kill you type thing -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP2 Those that really know have all signed NDA's. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange SP2 Tease -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange SP2 I heard today. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Tony Hlabse| || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/02/2001 09:27 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Exchange SP2 | --- | It was announced by MS on there site but haven't seen anything on a release date. Anybody know of when? I have an enhancement. I am looking for th Logon/Logoff button for OWA that is promised. I have lazy users. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Multiple instances of the same message
Send my tech buddy what he wants Pronto MIssy -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple instances of the same message Hey, you never send me anything! Andy -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple instances of the same message If you use mailstrm.exe does the process work? (which I sent you directly) -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple instances of the same message Hi Chris and thanks for the reply: Here is a more comprehensive explanation of the 'phenomenon' *Setup: Test network = 5xW2K Svr. Act.Dir. implemented. One Domain.One Forest.One tree. DNS and DHCP working perfectly (ahem) *I have an in-house developed app which fires the same SMTP 'mail' @ port 25 of the Exch2K machine. If I send one mail on one connection it works and the user receives the mail. *If I fire 10-1000 mails @ the W2K Svr. none are delivered. So as the message ID, size, sender and the subject are the same for all mails,(it is effectively the same mails sent over and over) I have concluded that there must be a setting in Exch.2K which disallows the delivery of the same message sent multiple times. This app works fine with Exch5.5 btw) *I can see the messages queued in the SMTP-Queues-Domain.com(local delivery) but after they leave there, they 'disappear' They Here is an excerpt from the log: the 10.0.0.3 machine is the one housing the app which is firing the mails. I need to know is there a setting in Exch2K which stops instances of the a mail with the same sender/message ID/size and or subject being delivered and if there is how/can I turn it off? An anti-spam setting perhaps? All help appreciated.E. #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2001-10-26 08:25:35 #Fields: time c-ip cs-method cs-uri-stem sc-status 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2001-10-26 08:25:35 #Fields: time c-ip cs-method cs-uri-stem sc-status 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2001-10-26 08:25:35 #Fields: time c-ip cs-method cs-uri-stem sc-status 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 QUIT - 0 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 QUIT - 0 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 EHLO - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 EHLO - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 MAIL - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 RCPT - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 DATA - 250 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 QUIT - 0 08:25:35 10.0.0.3 EHLO - 250 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Multiple instances of the same message Additional information required I believe (or at least a different description of the problem as I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around it)... Have you tried turning up logging on the smtp service? Also, how many simultaneous connections is the Exchange server configured to accept... And does changing this value have any effect? Chris -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Multiple instances of the same message Subject: Repeated e-mail not delivered from Exchange server Does anyone know if there is a setting in Exchange which stops the E2K server from delivering multiple instances of the same message from the same server all sent with the same few seconds? To further explain: I have an e-mail emulator which sends SMTP mail to port 25 of an E2K Svr. for delivery into a particular user mailbox, it is capable of sending up to 1000/messages a second. If I set it to
outlook urls losing clickability
Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outlook urls losing clickability
Thanks but I am talking about clickable urls in the same email yes. It is not specific emails. It works for a while then bam, it stops working in all emails. AVi -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Let me be more specific: The middle msn.microsoft.com link should not work. The other http://msn.microsoft.com; link does work (next time, I'll choose my examples better...) The reason for this is the way Outlook scans for URL's in the text of the message. It will usually pick up the www.whatever as a URL to click on (the same goes for anything that starts with the http://. However, for URL's that don't start with these, like msn.microsoft.com, etc.. it will not scan for these automatically. These can be made into clickable URL's by the sender if they are using Word as their email editor (shudder) and make the text a hyperlink through word. Or if they are creating messages as HTML. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Choi Rex Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability For example: www.hotmail.com msn.microsoft.com http://msn.microsoft.com The msn.microsoft.com link should not work, but the others should. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook urls losing clickability Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outlook urls losing clickability
upon reboot it returns. Avi -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Does the functionality ever return? Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Thanks but I am talking about clickable urls in the same email yes. It is not specific emails. It works for a while then bam, it stops working in all emails. AVi -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Let me be more specific: The middle msn.microsoft.com link should not work. The other http://msn.microsoft.com; link does work (next time, I'll choose my examples better...) The reason for this is the way Outlook scans for URL's in the text of the message. It will usually pick up the www.whatever as a URL to click on (the same goes for anything that starts with the http://. However, for URL's that don't start with these, like msn.microsoft.com, etc.. it will not scan for these automatically. These can be made into clickable URL's by the sender if they are using Word as their email editor (shudder) and make the text a hyperlink through word. Or if they are creating messages as HTML. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Choi Rex Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability For example: www.hotmail.com msn.microsoft.com http://msn.microsoft.com The msn.microsoft.com link should not work, but the others should. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook urls losing clickability Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday...yes it's that time
Sorry not this year. Maybe to junior a tech buddy to be seen at such an event... -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday...yes it's that time Tech Buddies must buy the beer. You going, Avi? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday...yes it's that time Tech buddies get nothing and like it. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 02:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday...yes it's that time do tech buddies get free beer? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday...yes it's that time That just means more beer For me, Dougie and Jimbo I'll save you a Coors Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 02:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday...yes it's that time Sorry to say this, But there will be no Ben and Jerry's at the MEC. Corporate travel is restricted for me now. I will not be there. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday...yes it's that time See you all at MEC What will I look forward to? [complete with the line of your choice:] Why, Ben and Jerry's Tony Redmond fun To see Missy K Migration classes Disneyworld, what else? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Can I also take on a tech buddy even though I am the recipient of a tech buddy? Maybe I can become a tech buddy in training? Avi -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Seriously...can someone be my tech buddy? And show me the true Exchange Jedi powers? :) John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Would you be my tech buddy? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I forgot who my tech buddy is -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Hey! Get off my Tech Buddy! Only I am allowed to harass him. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my websites -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM Subject: RE: MEC What is MEC?? -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard anything yet . . . - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: RE: MEC Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Easybake Oven
what did they recommend exactly? -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Because if they had put the actual requirements for win2k on the win2k boxes nobody would have bought it! In the past I've just double the box recommendations, for win2k it seems best to quad them! Tom Gray, CCNA, CBE Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I wonder why they doubled the specs when the OS is essentially the same as 2K with a new gui? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought they were ludicrous until I saw the requirements for anything named XP. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven I thought it was Microsoft that drives the larger hardware. Seen the minimum requirements for anything named 2000? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bauer, Mr. Rick Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Must be a COMPAQ server guy--always solve problems with bigger hardware. Rick Bauer The Hill School _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tech Buddies
You are sweet -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tech Buddies I wanted Andy David to answer that question. He's Avi's special Tech Buddy. We're pairing guys who ask neophyte questions with experienced technical people who owe me big and who have also angered me in some fashion. It's a great program and I'm optimistic about its potential. If *you* know someone who would be a great Tech Buddy, let me know who he is and which person you'd like to inflict upon him, and I'll see what I can do. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randal, Phil Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven Gosh, that info is hard to find on www.microsoft.com... NT4 server: 486/33, 32MB RAM if running IIS 4 Win 2K Prof: Pentium 133, 32MB RAM min, 64MB recommended Win XP Ready: Win2K capable with at least 128MB RAM Gave up looking at Microsoft's site having gleaned that much info. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 September 2001 14:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven what did they recommend exactly? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: today's admin backwards virus
You have it set up to send all attatchments to administrator email box? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus Good points Eric. That is exactly what we are doing with NAI's Webshield SMTP. I should have mentioned that we are quarantining rather than blocking in the true sense. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:29 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus The nice thing about MAILsweeper for SMTP (and I'm assuming others - I haven't used them) is that you can quarantine messages, not just block them. We had MAILsweeper quarantine all suspicious incoming content and send a notification to the recipient that they had a message in quarantine. Our policy was that any user could request a message be released to them, at which point we (the admins) would review the message on a threat basis only and release at our discretion. A nice side benefit of this policy was that even though we were not policing the content of our incoming mail (impossible with 20,000+ recipients) the users were under the impression that we may have been. So they were telling their buddies to stop sending them porn, executables, etc for fear that they were being watched. Eric On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:07:05 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, there's a fundamental problem we have here; we're a public library, and freedom to write and receive email here is not to be impinged in any way. Even in blocking certain attachment types, I'm kind of stepping over the line. So, in terms of filtering for any virus-related terminology, I can probably get away with using software that filters for language. But, I will be told by management to turn it off if we attempt to do anything that restricts anything else. That's why I mentioned that it was not of great concern. Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus Blocking for certain words is an important part of filtering for viruses in my opinion. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus So, does anyone have a strong opinion on what filtering software to use? We haven't done anything along those lines before (hell, we didn't have antivirus until last year). I just want to use it for blocking attachments; we don't care about abilities relating to disclaimers or scanning for certain language/words. Any opinions would help. Thanks! Matt -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus Jennifer, Most everyone has already hit on the obvious, most of us use the auto-update feature from the A/V product of our choosing. Then we go the extra step and use some sort of filtering, be it at the fire wall or just simple attachment blocking in our e-mail server A/V product. Here I block .exe;.vbs;.eml;.shs;.lnk attachments from even getting through the e-mail server. Take what has happened to your site up the ladder as a reason to put all this stuff in place! You might get some resistance, and even some complaints, however every time one of these things happens the efforts you have made will be seen and will be appreciated. TrueSecure www.trusecure.com has some good white papers on what types of attachments you should be, or at least thinking about blocking. Oh, the other thing we did was, well we threw IIS right out the window!! Good Luck Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: today's admin backwards virus I was just noticing that most of the gurus of the list had plenty of time to respond to the list regarding various questions. Am I missing something? I have been updating virus software, scanning mailboxes, patching iis/owa servers etc. all night. We were hit externally, but we only had to restore one webserver
RE: Urgent!
none of the web sites work. has anyone been able to d/l the files? -Original Message- From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! From MSNBC: http://www.msnbc.com/news/627028.asp EW YORK, Sept. 11 Two aircraft slammed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York on Tuesday, creating a horrific scene that President Bush called an apparent terrorist attack on our country. A short time later, a blast was reported at the Pentagon's heliport, and it, the West Wing of the White House and the Capitol were being evacuated. In addition, the Federal Aviation Administration grounded all civilian aircraft nationwide and ordered planes in the air to land immediately at the nearest airport. NBC'S JIM MIKLASEWSKI, reporting from the Pentagon, said an official told him a bomb was apparently detonated at the Pentagon's heliport, which lies beyond the building's tight security. Other reports said the blast could have been caused by yet another aircraft. In New York, the aircraft struck minutes apart, starting fires and sending smoke billowing out of the skyscrapers. The first crash happened shortly before 9 a.m. ET. MSNBC.com reporter Martin Wolk, who was inside one of the towers, said the lights flickered and then a loud bang was heard. People panicked and started to flee the building. When they reached the lobby, smoke started to fill the building and people could see debris falling and many cars outside were damaged. It was sheer pandemonium, people were screaming and crying, afraid to go outside because of the falling debris, Wolk said. We looked up and it looked like the top 20 floors were in flames. Another bystander described a barrage of debris raining down on the sidewalk below. Shortly after 9 a.m., a second aircraft was seen crashing into the other tower. Broadcast cameras already watching the scene filmed the second plane as it slammed into the tower and exploded in a huge fireball. A half hour later, President Bush made a brief statement to reporters, calling the disaster a national tragedy and attributing it to terrorists. He did not cite any specific terrorist groups. In the wake of the crashes, New York airports and the Lincoln Tunnel were closed as precautionary measures. The stock exchanges in New York also did not open. Large holes were visible in sides of the 110-story buildings. The tops of the twin towers were obscured by the smoke. Thousands of pieces of what appeared to be office paper came drifting over Brooklyn, about three miles from the tower, one witness said. In an earlier terrorist attack, the center was bombed on Feb. 26, 1993, killing six people and injured more than 1,000 others. The FBI said it was investigating reports of a hijacking. A United Airlines employee said he had heard reports that an American Airlines jet had been hijacked and was one of the two aircraft that flew into the center. Sources told NBC's Andrea Mitchell that the jet was flying from Boston to Los Angeles when it apparently was hijacked. Traffic entering New York City from New Jersey was at a standstill approaching the Holland Tunnel as motorists stood outside their cars watching the fire. This is a breaking story and will be updated. The Associated Press contributed to this report. -Original Message- From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! A lot of smoke on the TV from near it - no sure what or how close. JDE -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! Is it also confirmed that the Pentagon has been hit with something as well? Rob -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! I saw the second one flying into the building live on TV. Apperantly a hijacked 767 passenger jet from Boston. Most of the newssites are hammered with traffic now; www.ananova.com www.msnbc.com www.cnn.com Martin - Original Message - From: Woodrick, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: Urgent! Folks, If you haven't heard, two aircraft have crashed into the World Trade Center towers. This is not a joke. Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: Urgent!
Well is it about time or what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! Yeah but does the Q'uran tell them to have parties in the friggin streets after this tragedy??? Just watched footage of the reaction of the people in Palestine... Yes, they are CELEBRATING! I hope we crash the party. Literally. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! Probably 15 whacko groups are going to claim responsibility before this is done. Please let's not participate in the immediate targetting (and attacks) of the Muslim faithful, or people who have been displaced or displeased by highly complex Middle Eastern politics, as was done in 1993 after two WHITE, AMERICAN, pseudo-patriotic nutcases killed innocent people in Oklahoma City. The Q'uran is a Holy Text. Not a manual of terrorism. -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:25 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Urgent! Subject: RE: Urgent! The FBI is investigating reports a Palestinian terrorist group has claimed responsibility for the World Trade Center crashes. The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine has reportedly carried out the atrocity. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
maybe they don't and that is the scary part... but also maybe our past actions made them think so.. or allowed them to think so -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! Wow. Don't they realize that any chance of getting any peace or homeland or really anything but a life of terror and war occupation evaporated this morning? Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! Yeah but does the Q'uran tell them to have parties in the friggin streets after this tragedy??? Just watched footage of the reaction of the people in Palestine... Yes, they are CELEBRATING! I hope we crash the party. Literally. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! Probably 15 whacko groups are going to claim responsibility before this is done. Please let's not participate in the immediate targetting (and attacks) of the Muslim faithful, or people who have been displaced or displeased by highly complex Middle Eastern politics, as was done in 1993 after two WHITE, AMERICAN, pseudo-patriotic nutcases killed innocent people in Oklahoma City. The Q'uran is a Holy Text. Not a manual of terrorism. -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:25 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Urgent! Subject: RE: Urgent! The FBI is investigating reports a Palestinian terrorist group has claimed responsibility for the World Trade Center crashes. The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine has reportedly carried out the atrocity. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can you believe this crap?
a terrorist web organization? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can you believe this crap? While I can't say this is a legitimate statement from CoffeeCup, I can say that if France was to blame, they should have thought about the men, women, children of the targets of their attack. They didn't seem real concerned about their targets. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can you believe this crap? sarcasm You are so right! When we find out who did this we should just tell not to do it again. That was so naughty of them. Let's send them to their room for time out. No supper for them either. Bad terrorists, bad!! Can't we just get along? /sarcasm Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 Cell: 817-999-7703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can you belive this crap? I supposed if they find out that people in France were responsible for the terrorist attack that we should massacre all the men women and children there that had nothing to do with it. Nice company coffee crap -Original Message- From: CoffeeCup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: September 11, 2001 10:29 AM To: Loyal User Subject: The Attacks on the US Hello everyone, This is Nicholas Longo, the CEO of CoffeeCup Software. As you may have heard the World Trade Center and Pentagon were attacked about 45 minutes ago. The Team at CoffeeCup would like to send our heart felt sorrow to those that perished in these attacks. We would like to also say on record that if any country is found responsible for these attacks, we call for that country's complete destruction and annihilation. Do not let terrorism which is designed to create fear and stop production, halt your life or work. Stay focused and do not stop what you are doing. -May God bless us all and the decisions we must make. Nick- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can someone let me know...
herein Connecticut. 3 banks robbed, one under siege now in meriden. everyone is on the band wagon.. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can someone let me know... Total chaos? Heightened activity due to alert status, maybe. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can someone let me know... or command centers/Federal operations... my g/f is in Huntsville and she reported to me that is it total chaos, due to the missile command center in the area -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Strome Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can someone let me know... Stay where you feel safest. No martial law. All flights in North America and all borders are closed. I personally would stay away from any large buildings, federal buildings, financial centers, anything that can draw targets. -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can someone let me know... Hey, I'm stuck here without radio or TV. The entire net (news wise anyway) is dead. What the heck is going on? I hear all kinds of rumors about martial law, the government telling people to go home and stay home... Should I stay at work, do I need to stay off the roads, what the hell is going on. -- Craig Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS Manager Stanek Tool Corp. http://www.stanektool.com New Berlin, WI _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku? Friday!
what kind of fish do they put in the tacos? out here in connecticut we just have taco bell, NO fish and not even sure what the meat is made up of. bean burritos are the way to go. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku? Friday! This haiku was produced because my wife told me I cannot live on Fish Tacos -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku? Friday! Fish Tacos for Lunch Fish Tacos for Dinner Too Man can live on fish -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bueffel, Scott M - CNF Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku? Friday! Not bad for starters But most people like to talk About fish tacos. -Original Message- From: Brannon, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku? Friday! It is rare that I Contribute to list, but I must Haiku Fridays First attempt and submitted even if too lame, cause I hadn't seen any as yet. Chip Brannon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fish Tacos
What is a standard? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fish Tacos I believe it would be naiive to assume that all tacos served in Mexico conform to some technical standard. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fish Tacos From a friend: Subject: RE: [LAwDW] Fish Taco's Book of Refreshments, Chapter 3, Verses 1 - 12 1. The master looked upon the crowd as they were locked in throes of a great conflagration and spoke to them. 2. There once was a maker of tacos called Juan. He was very successful in his home town of Santo Poco and was well known for making the best tacos in the land. Sadly, all the lands around Santo Poco were struck with a horrible blight that caused the tortillas to wilt on the vine and made them unsuitable for harvest. 3. So Juan and his family travelled far to the north, to a land where tacos were few and far between, and there he opened a small taco stand to feed those who hungered for tacos. 4. The customers came to the stand, and among them was one named Rafael. His grandparents also came from the lands to the south, and he was widely considered to be an expert on all things taco. Rafael examined the menu quite closely and proclaimed That's not a taco. A 'real' taco contains cheese, lettuce, beef/chicken, diced tomatoes, and hot sauce within a crunchy corn or soft flour taco shell. 5. And Rafael turned and left the taco stand without partaking of Juan's tacos. 6. Seeing that Rafael had snubbed the taco stand, the customers also examined the menu and agreed that the tacos sold at the stand were not real tacos, and then they also left. 7. Juan's hart was heavy with sorrow, and his shelves were full of unsold tacos. 8. But there were a small number of customers that were of adventurous palate. They tried the tacos of Juan's taco stand and found them quite pleasing. Some said It's not a real taco, but it's still good, and others proclaimed Hey, I like this. Then one named Alfonzo said This is a lot better than those crap tacos they sell down the street. 9. Juan's spirits were lifted, and his shelves were emptied day after day. 10. Then the master looked at the confused crowd and explained. 11. A taco is not in the cheese, or beef, or crispy shell. A taco is in the warm, happy feeling you have after eating it... oh, and in the cillantro it's seasoned with... and the cervesa you drink with it... and the sliced hot peppers, got to have those. 12. And the crowd became very annoyed and pummeled the master greatly and with much vigor, and went on to debate the merits of tamales. Quoted from Martin Blackstone - 8/22/01, 10:49 AM -0700: Then he says this... A 'real' taco contains cheese, lettuce, beef/chicken, diced tomatoes, hot sauce within a crunchy corn or soft flour taco shell. Anything else must be from California. Which if you have even been to Mexico you know is not the way they serve a taco... (By CtSM) Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good. -- Joe Paterno _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
