RE: Detect unauthorized access to mailbox by administrator
The only way I know of is to increase the logging for the info store to medium and then look for event 1016 in the application log on the exchange server. This is generated every time an account accesses a mailbox that is not its primary mailbox. No amount of permission granting will stop it from being generated. You can also look in the Exchange properties for the server mailboxes to see who last logged on to a particular mailbox. You could also look in the person's File, Open in Outlook and see if another mailbox is in the recently accessed list. Either way you will need to access the Exchange server or the user's local Outlook. If wrong doing is suspected, it is appropriate for the CEO to order an audit of operations and see what comes up. I'm not aware of any auditing tools that would not require at least minimal access to the user's logon and workstation or the exchange server. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 03:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Detect unauthorized access to mailbox by administrator Hi, I am a independent consultant hired to investigate an administrator who the CEO belives he is accessing sensative email from others mailbox. While it is NOT possible to configure anything on the exchange server, is there anything I can do a spot-check or any tools like sniffer, so that I can monitor any possible wrong-doing of the administrator? If you have any insight on this issue, please kindly drop me a line at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Rick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
Sort of. There are no well documented criteria that you apply for and then meet, there are informal criteria that leads to an invitation. As I said, others must decide whether the criteria meet the expertise they are looking for. That does not make it unethical, as you know. I seriously doubt any customer will give you a blank check simply based on being an MVP, but I know I can have a higher degree of trust for the info (usually) a MVP provides in lists like this. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Just so that the record is set straight and Deckler doesn't feel the need to write a 2,000-word response to this technical inaccuracy, the title of MVP isn't awarded based set standards. It's rather subjective, I must confess. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Bartley Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Titles based on criteria that has been successfully met, as in MVP or Cisco Certified, etc., has no ethical issues. It is an earned title that denotes an area of expertise. It is up to those who view the title to determine if the criteria for getting the title warrants a level of trust and respect. Personal gifts from vendors that you make purchasing decisions regarding is unethical. Rules of ethics are necessary in this business. Ceaselessly arguing in order to have the last word is poor use of brain power, poor use of this list and poor use of ethics. Anyone whose priority is to *always* win the "fight" must sacrifice the truth and good judgment, thereby violating basic ethics. Just another opinion :-) Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics I got to the first paragraph in your post and pretty much quit reading. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
Titles based on criteria that has been successfully met, as in MVP or Cisco Certified, etc., has no ethical issues. It is an earned title that denotes an area of expertise. It is up to those who view the title to determine if the criteria for getting the title warrants a level of trust and respect. Personal gifts from vendors that you make purchasing decisions regarding is unethical. Rules of ethics are necessary in this business. Ceaselessly arguing in order to have the last word is poor use of brain power, poor use of this list and poor use of ethics. Anyone whose priority is to *always* win the "fight" must sacrifice the truth and good judgment, thereby violating basic ethics. Just another opinion :-) Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics I got to the first paragraph in your post and pretty much quit reading. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rumour - Spammers control "New mail desktop alert" ?
It is perception sometimes, particularly if this was related to your boss by someone else. Anyway, it is possible for the new mail alert to stay up longer than normal depending on where mouse focus last was. Additionally, since it is a link to the email, it is normal behavior for the cursor to change. It is possible that it was being described "and the cursor changed to a click me hand icon" as opposed to the pop up had a hand in it and said click me? Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rumour - Spammers control "New mail desktop alert" ? OK, this is a bit of a weird one, but this is from a first hand account from my boss, who is not given to hallucinations or flights of fancy. . The story goes that a piece of Spam was received in the Inbox, and a "New Mail Desktop Alert" (the little transparent email preview that apears above the system tray). Happens all the time, except this time it was different. The preview stayed for at least a minute, and displayed a "hand" icon and a "Click Me" message. Neither of these were evident in the mail message. Is it possible that this feature could be under pogrammatic control by the bad guys? Anyone else seen anything weird like this? We are running OL 2003, connected to a Exchange 5.5 sp4 server. Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISA group list
http://www.ISAserver.org Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 09:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ISA group list I will be doing a rather complex deployment it the near future dealing with Exchange. Can anyone recommend a good ISA list? _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Question
http://Servername/exchange/mailboxname/calendar Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 08:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Question I thought for some reason that you could view others calendars via OWA. Is it possible to view the calendars of others via OWA. If yes, how? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High Availability Exchange 2000
It is not all it is cracked up to be. The VSS support in BE9, build 4454 (the only one that supports it), is very unreliable. Sometimes it works, sometimes it does not. Especially with a Win2k3 domain controller. Does not cause any damage, just does not always query the writer properly and therefore fails to backup. I'm not sure it works with Exchange 2003 on the live database, I did not see it in the Shadow Copy items that can be backed up on our test server. It does work on a SQL database though. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000 Cool keep the info coming, if you find the PPT would you be prepared to mail it? VSS for Exchange 2003 would be a life saver. It has become such an issue here that we are looking at other mail solutions and no it is not Notes but a solution from a large database organisation ;o) Paul -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 July 2003 18:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000 Ill have to look. I thought they were not ready yet. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000 I thought the presentations at TechEd indicated BackupExec supported that? Yup - BE 9.0 gives you several choices for Advanced Open File including Microsoft's Volume Shadow Copy Service. I'll have to dig up that ppt again. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:25 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: High Availability Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000 Being able to take snapshot backups and restores is going to be sweet. Is there anything out there that supports it yet? -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000 How about Exchange 2003 with Volume Shadowing on a SAN. Not seen it in practise but I thought this was one of the strong selling points of E2K3. Anyone had any experience? Paul -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 July 2003 18:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: High Availability Exchange 2000 Hello All. Little Background: Last week, Exchange 5.5 server went ka-poot early in the day and I was unable to recover the IS. We ended up losing 11 hours of data that was not on a backup tape. A key member of the management team has had the stance in the past that email is "best-effort". I knew that would fly until the time that messages and calendar info was lost. I was right! Where there was no money before has come lots of money to make Exchange high availability. Amazing what a little data loss can produce...huh? Anyhoo, my task now is to find information about either SANs, Clustering, Mirroring Any suggestions or comments is always appreciated by you. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mail
RE: Renaming a mailbox
Go to the properties for the user, click the email addresses tab and edit or add the email address you want. Go to Exchange General tab and change the alias to match the renamed logon name. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 20:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Renaming a mailbox I've done that, if by the MMC you mean the ADU&C MMC plugin. The name appears correctly everywhere except for the mailbox and the from name. I'm not sure if it's stored somewhere else outside of active directory or not. Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: PF: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Renaming a mailbox > misspelled name. I'm not sure if these two are related or now. How do > I rename the mailbox, and the from name? Right-click on the user's name in the MMC and select "rename" -kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping
My mistake, there is already a Hot fix 2 for revision 4454. However, it is just to add tape support for S-AIT, so I don't think it will affect the remote agent on Exchange problem. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping Actually, there were 13 hot fixes in addition to SP1. However, dump all that make sure you have the new complete rebuild version 4454. It supposedly solved some issues with Exchange among many. Make sure you push a new install of the agent to the Exchange server after the update. I will warn though that in our environment, it solved a couple of things but introduced some new ones. Veritas doesn't seem to be applying very much QC to this product anymore. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping There is also a HOTFIX 2 for this version and also a new set of drivers out there. You might try the Hotfix. Scott -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping Yes, and it didn't help. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping Have you applied SP1? - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:04 AM Subject: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping Are other people having trouble with the Exchange remote agent service stopping? We did the update to 9.0, it worked two days in a row and failed again. Thanks for any replies, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping
Actually, there were 13 hot fixes in addition to SP1. However, dump all that make sure you have the new complete rebuild version 4454. It supposedly solved some issues with Exchange among many. Make sure you push a new install of the agent to the Exchange server after the update. I will warn though that in our environment, it solved a couple of things but introduced some new ones. Veritas doesn't seem to be applying very much QC to this product anymore. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping There is also a HOTFIX 2 for this version and also a new set of drivers out there. You might try the Hotfix. Scott -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping Yes, and it didn't help. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping Have you applied SP1? - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:04 AM Subject: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping Are other people having trouble with the Exchange remote agent service stopping? We did the update to 9.0, it worked two days in a row and failed again. Thanks for any replies, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
A major automotive manufacturer did this for a bit, required in the company pronounced sig. It was very silly and amateurish, made employees very embarrassed to send email. The logo was about 200x200 and they used fonts at about 16 pt. I guess they saw the light, I don't see it in their sigs anymore, just normal text now. Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Fenton Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 16:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails And an electric email commanded taser to shock some sense into him/her Fenton -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I'll suggest that! Maybe something self-executing with a company theme song. Announce your presence with authority! :) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:38 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Inserting Logo on Internet emails > > Heck, why stop there. > Include a handy PowerPoint presentation with every email! > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Ben Schorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM > Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails > > > > I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A > friend from > > another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that > looks like > their > > company letterhead. > > > > That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail > client doesn't > > support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people > on dial-up > links > > and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. > > > > -Ben- > > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 > > Director of Information Services > > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:32 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails > > > > > > Other than shiny things making managers happy, what is the > > > business thingamabob you're trying to solve with putting the logo? > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:29 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails > > > > > > > > > > > > I've thought of that but that then requires touching each > > > client does > > > > it not? Is there a way to force stationary on the server level? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Gill Gilliland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:29 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails > > > > > > > > Couldn't you just create your own "stationary" that would > > > include the > > > > logo? > > > > > > > > Gill > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Mark Nold > > > > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:12 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions as to which 3rd party apps? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:19 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:59 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on I
RE: Monitor Email content
In some states of the US that is true. In others you must provide due notice. In some cases even a logon warning is recommended. Otherwise the company can be liable for civil action. Email does not actually fall in to the wiretapping statutes, I don't think anyway. For wiretapping, it is different. In fact, in some states, even cameras and "baby monitors" can be used with no notice. The defining rule on that is whether it is recorded or not. If it is not recorded, it does not fall in to the wiretap or communications laws. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:38 To: Exchange Discussions not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: "Midgley, Ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content > Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email > policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. > Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones > privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do > this sort of thing. > > -Original Message- > From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Monitor Email content > > > I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the > best method? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ** > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential > to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail > in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail > and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised > disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is > prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are > those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, > and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. > The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss > or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors > or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. > This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, > a copy of which can be obtained on request. > ** > ** > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
I saw this with an ATI video chip. Latest driver fixed it. Not all O11 menu items just certain ones. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions I havent see that. I can however make Outlook crash on cue by simply trying to access the Import and Export menu. - Original Message - From: "Clishe, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:40 PM Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command? Good call. I was able to add the Archive command to a toolbar from Tools | Customize | Commands. Still would like to know WTF it isn't in my File menu. JC > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Can you add those choices from Tools/Customize and > rebuild/reset the toolbars? > > - Original Message - > From: "Clishe, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:25 PM > Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command? > > > No, no import/export command either (that's another thing that's been > bugging me) > > I'm in the main OL window, and I've been doing from every folder > (Contacts, Inbox, OL Today, etc) and I get the same options each time. > And no Archive command. > > JC > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:15 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Something's missing. Do you have an import/export command? > > Are you in the main OL window and not looking at the File > > menu that you get when a message is open? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:12 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Nope, no Adaptive menu's. My File menu reads: > > > > > > New -> > > > Open -> > > > Close All Items > > > - > > > Save As > > > Save Attachments -> > > > - > > > Folder -> > > > - > > > Data File Management > > > - > > > Page Setup -> > > > Print Preview > > > Print > > > - > > > Exit > > > > > > JC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:52 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > > It's under my File menu. Do you have Adaptive menus enabled? > > > > What happens when you click on the double-chevron at the > > bottom of > > > > the menu? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:50 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > > > > Previous versions of Outlook had an Archive command on the > > > > File menu > > > > > that would allow you to initiate an immediate archive, and > > > > you could > > > > > override folder-specific archive settings and instead > > archive all > > > > > items in all folders older than a given date. > > > > > > > > > > Where'd that go? My File menu does not have an Archive > > > command, no > > > > > matter which folder I happen to be in. The Outlook 11 > > > help seems to > > > > > indicate that there should in fact be an Archive command on > > > > the File > > > > > menu, but I sure can't find it. > > > > > > > > > > JC > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > > Web Interface: > > > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > > > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] &
RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
Sure, but I was addressing what he said too. He was trying to find it in the menu. He needed to add it to the toolbar, if available, as a work around to it missing from the menu, not reset the toolbar. :-) Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 13:43 To: Exchange Discussions Isnt that what I just said? Rebuild/ Reset the Toolbar. - Original Message - From: "Dan Bartley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command? I think that only affects toolbars, not menus. However it brings up an interesting question. If you go to Tools, Customize, Commands. Do you see Archive and Import/Export as selections in the File category? If so, drag them to a toolbar. Bottom line though is this is beta 2. Things happen. There is a refresh coming out any day for those who have beta 2. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 13:34 To: Exchange Discussions Can you add those choices from Tools/Customize and rebuild/reset the toolbars? - Original Message - From: "Clishe, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:25 PM Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command? No, no import/export command either (that's another thing that's been bugging me) I'm in the main OL window, and I've been doing from every folder (Contacts, Inbox, OL Today, etc) and I get the same options each time. And no Archive command. JC > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Something's missing. Do you have an import/export command? > Are you in the main OL window and not looking at the File > menu that you get when a message is open? > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:12 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Nope, no Adaptive menu's. My File menu reads: > > > > New -> > > Open -> > > Close All Items > > - > > Save As > > Save Attachments -> > > - > > Folder -> > > - > > Data File Management > > - > > Page Setup -> > > Print Preview > > Print > > - > > Exit > > > > JC > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:52 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > It's under my File menu. Do you have Adaptive menus enabled? > > > What happens when you click on the double-chevron at the > bottom of > > > the menu? > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:50 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > > Previous versions of Outlook had an Archive command on the > > > File menu > > > > that would allow you to initiate an immediate archive, and > > > you could > > > > override folder-specific archive settings and instead > archive all > > > > items in all folders older than a given date. > > > > > > > > Where'd that go? My File menu does not have an Archive > > command, no > > > > matter which folder I happen to be in. The Outlook 11 > > help seems to > > > > indicate that there should in fact be an Archive command on > > > the File > > > > menu, but I sure can't find it. > > > > > > > > JC > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Web Interface: > > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/ex
RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command?
I think that only affects toolbars, not menus. However it brings up an interesting question. If you go to Tools, Customize, Commands. Do you see Archive and Import/Export as selections in the File category? If so, drag them to a toolbar. Bottom line though is this is beta 2. Things happen. There is a refresh coming out any day for those who have beta 2. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 13:34 To: Exchange Discussions Can you add those choices from Tools/Customize and rebuild/reset the toolbars? - Original Message - From: "Clishe, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:25 PM Subject: RE: Outlook 11: Where's the archive command? No, no import/export command either (that's another thing that's been bugging me) I'm in the main OL window, and I've been doing from every folder (Contacts, Inbox, OL Today, etc) and I get the same options each time. And no Archive command. JC > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Something's missing. Do you have an import/export command? > Are you in the main OL window and not looking at the File > menu that you get when a message is open? > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:12 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Nope, no Adaptive menu's. My File menu reads: > > > > New -> > > Open -> > > Close All Items > > - > > Save As > > Save Attachments -> > > - > > Folder -> > > - > > Data File Management > > - > > Page Setup -> > > Print Preview > > Print > > - > > Exit > > > > JC > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:52 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > It's under my File menu. Do you have Adaptive menus enabled? > > > What happens when you click on the double-chevron at the > bottom of > > > the menu? > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:50 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > > Previous versions of Outlook had an Archive command on the > > > File menu > > > > that would allow you to initiate an immediate archive, and > > > you could > > > > override folder-specific archive settings and instead > archive all > > > > items in all folders older than a given date. > > > > > > > > Where'd that go? My File menu does not have an Archive > > command, no > > > > matter which folder I happen to be in. The Outlook 11 > > help seems to > > > > indicate that there should in fact be an Archive command on > > > the File > > > > menu, but I sure can't find it. > > > > > > > > JC > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Web Interface: > > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exc
RE: Outlook 2003 Beta 2
That is where the OS2k3 resource kit comes in. Build a custom installation and you have the ability to turn it off as the default. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Diane Poremsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:27 To: Exchange Discussions 'tis too, at least in current builds. AFAIK, it will remain default in later builds too. - Original Message - > I dont believe its enabled by default. > > - Original Message - > From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:07 AM > Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Beta 2 > > > I wasn't thinking of the bandwidth side, that's not a problem. Is the > local copy enabled by default? Don't get me wrong, I think it's a very > good design. I was just thinking about using different profiles on the > same PC. If you can disable it, then no worries. Reviewing GFI Mail Essentials v8 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Outlook 2003 will make this possible (as well as user specified sounds, etc.), current versions do not. He will have to wait. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Wasting...damn spell checker :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said it wasn't possible. Case close, it's not worth waiting the time on. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further. Avi -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few > minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of > request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, > respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then > it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two > willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants > it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender i
RE: OWA Question
Yep, completely missed she said 5.5. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions I don't think this works with Exchange 5.5. In Exchange 5.5 you can only open your own calendar and task items. Not anyone else's or the ones on Public Folders. In exchange 2000 you can open anyone's caledars, tasks, etc. as long as you have permissions. Sandhya Pai Manager of Server and Network Services School of Business University of Connecticut -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Question I'm guessing we are talking two different versions of OWA here. Ken -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions huh? Could you elaborate a littleplease. Go to IE URL - owaserver/exchange/username/calendar When I do this get Page Cannot Be Displayed. What am I doing wrong? Thank you so much. -Original Message----- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Question Owaserver/exchange/username/calendar Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 14:07 To: Exchange Discussions Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Is there a way for those users who access Exchange via OWA to view calendars of others in the organization? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Question
Owaserver/exchange/username/calendar Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 14:07 To: Exchange Discussions Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Is there a way for those users who access Exchange via OWA to view calendars of others in the organization? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
It happens. We get an administrative alert and deal with it. The best way for us to always know is the administrative alert, not the sender notification. No auto sender notification from outside is needed or will be forthcoming, because it doesn't make it outside, assuming our AV is working as well as anyone else's. The latter is up to our QC methods. Even if the internal sender got an auto sender notification, rarely would that benefit us, the people who must deal with it. 80% of them would not understand it and delete it without telling anyone. We never see it, so it serves no useful purpose. On the other hand, if an infected email did make it out and someone confirmed it came from here and sent a notification that clearly came from a person who confirmed, it will tend to command more attention. It will provide useful information to IT to deal with it and give a destination to respond to. For those emails we receive that are likely to have a traceable source, we might spend 2 minutes collecting that info and sending out a notification that explains the confirmation of source. For those Trojans that are known to spoof, we don't bother. The flip side is if one is received by one of our users and they react to it and call us, we must scope out the notice, confirm it is not legitimate, allay the fears of the user (who now believes someone is "stealing" their email address) and in most cases do a full scan of their system to help them feel safe. We now took them out of service during the scan and tied up an IT person. Most of the time that user will call us every time the printer skips a page for the next 2 weeks because they are afraid they might have a virus despite our best efforts. They also now wonder if someone is watching them (the same person who "stole" their email address). And so on. So the latter has consumed potentially hours of our time. Why? Because someone did not want to take 2 minutes of their time to filter through the incoming virus alerts and preferred to let an auto-generated notice consume our time instead. Again, that is the Netiquette part I was referring to. Oh, and guess what! The auto notification is one of the factors that lead to DoS conditions when these things really proliferate. You have doubled the traffic on your email server during a heavy load condition. And you have contributed to the same condition on someone else's server. Our IT is under staffed and under funded, like most. I know how it feels to cause someone to have to consume extra time and money that is in short supply, I care not to do that to someone else. Kind of an IT Golden Rule as it were. While it would be nice to sit in a closed and insulated environment and never have to worry about anyone on the outside, the use of the Internet makes that not doable. I certainly beat this to death, all I will have to say on it. I am unlikely to alter my hard coded work ethic on this type of thing, unlikely to alter the hard coded work ethic of someone else on this kind of thing. :-) Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:27 To: Exchange Discussions Here's the problem with not performing sender notifications: What if your user is the sender? Don't say it doesn't happen. It does, and sometimes that's the best way for you to know it happened. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > We don't send sender notifications. It is bad Netiquette in > the current Trojan environment. It is bad for email lists, it > is bad for IT departments and it is bad for individual users. > > However, we do look at the recipient and administrative > notifications. If it is klez, sobig, etc. we pretty much > ignore it. If it is something else we look at the headers and > see if we can trace it. If we can, we send a notification. > > A little extra work for us, but we are not causing extra work > for others by doing it this way. That is where the above "bad > Netiquette" comment comes from. > > Best Regards, > > Dan Bartley > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:56 > To: Exchange Discussions > > A simple change in the notification could solve this problem. > You could say "your system might possibly be infected with a > virus" or something along those line. But the problem of > spoofing your trying to get across is more of a problem with > e-mail in general
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
We don't send sender notifications. It is bad Netiquette in the current Trojan environment. It is bad for email lists, it is bad for IT departments and it is bad for individual users. However, we do look at the recipient and administrative notifications. If it is klez, sobig, etc. we pretty much ignore it. If it is something else we look at the headers and see if we can trace it. If we can, we send a notification. A little extra work for us, but we are not causing extra work for others by doing it this way. That is where the above "bad Netiquette" comment comes from. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:56 To: Exchange Discussions A simple change in the notification could solve this problem. You could say "your system might possibly be infected with a virus" or something along those line. But the problem of spoofing your trying to get across is more of a problem with e-mail in general then with anti-virus software. What going to happen when p*rn spammers start sending messages to users as [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harmer, Michael Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? Ah, but "Don't send me viruses and I won't send you those notifications in the first place." is the flaw. They did not send you the virus. They mearly were member of some distribution list, had their e-mail on a web site, or corrisponded with the person that was actually infected. Unfortunatly, in your desire to 'assist' those that have no technical ability(A noble cause), you send many messages to people who have done you no wrong. 99 out of 100 times your sending someone a message that indicates that they are infected. This causes any responsible person to panic, scan their system, and find nothing. In the end this has as much or more 'cost' as most of the viruses put together. There is nothing wrong with sending the message if you are 99% sure the from or reply address is correct, but otherwise, your risking offending people and causing increases in costs for other companies and individuals. Here are a couple of possible situations that currently can happen. 1 : The CEO of your company is the member of a Senior Executive group and they have a mailing list. Someone who is infected visits the web site for the group, which has the posting e-mail list on it. You receive a infected message to someone inside your network. Your system replys with the 'Your Infected' e-mail. Your CEO gets a copy. He has his favorite computer savvy family member check his computer. The family member says that the computer is fine and that the message was incorrect. The CEO is displeased at the wasted time trying to fix a unknown problem. You get a memo the next day, one that I doubt would be plesant. 2 : Assume that your company values corprate relations. Some random person is infected with one of these spoofing viruses. They had visited the web site for a company that your company values in the corprate relationship sense. Note that the value could be any number of things. The other companies web site had a sales or management e-mail address for contacting them. This random person sends to you the virus with the other companies list address. You will be sending a message that WILL cause the other company expense and frustration. That WILL damage relationships with that company. Will it break them, probibly not, but you can not say with 100% certainty that it will not. Yes, the other company could have had a virus of the non-spoofing kind, but your job is to protect your computers first, and I assume you have done that or this conversation would not be happening. So it costs you nothing if they send you a virus short of the continued maintence costs for the software. Which you will have to spend anyway as there will always be > 0 viruses in the wild. Responding that they have a virus in the case of a non-spoofing virus is fine, few would argue that it is not fair. However, the problem is that now the viruses are lieing about where they came from, so the increadbly simple rules of the past are no longer just or safe for our carears. What we need to do is get the mail monitor product vendors to get some smarts and add the ability to suppress mail back in the case of a spoofing virus. That way you could continue to crusade to end viruses and not risk anything. Untill then, I disagree with punishing innocent people and letting the criminal go free. - Michael - -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions For us the 1% just happened to be one o
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
We leave them off. The majority of today's virus' and Trojans are not from who they say they are. If we see one that is legitimate on the From address we will send a note separately. Notifying the sender when they weren't the sender doesn't really help them know their email was hijacked. They can't use the notice to track down who really sent it so it usually just agitates the person. We do leave admin notification on though. It is also nice for not email bombing a list someone might subscribe to, such as a security list where people send sample code that is often identified by most scanners as an active code. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 08:19 To: Exchange Discussions I leave them on - it's a good indication someone is hijacking their mail accounts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > Off topic. > > With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof > the sender we are starting to get complaints from users who > are receiving the sender notifications messages from our > ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually send any virus. > I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who > are sending viruses will not get notified that they are > infected. Kind of a catch 22. I'm curious what other > administrators policies are regarding notification messages > to the sender. Have you disabled sender notifications or are > you just living with it? > > Pete Pfefferkorn > Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator > University of Cincinnati > 51 Goodman Street > Cincinnati, OH 45221 > Phone - (513) 556-9076 > Fax - (513) 556-2042 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows 2000 vpn
Is this everyone or just some. Is WINS being used? One of the increasingly common problems for me has been private side networks on DSL and Cable connections. Many networks are set up to use default private IP space. Many routers and cable/dsl modems do the same. As a result the private side of the DSL/Cable is using the same address space as the Exchange network. Therefore just a little routing confusion on the client side develops. It usually shows when trying to reach an Exchange server before anywhere else. Just a possibility. I've actually had almost half my VPN routing issues turn out to be this. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 14:01 To: Exchange Discussions Are there any NAT firewalls between the client and the Exchange server? What VPN client are they using? Nate -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Windows 2000 vpn Hello, We use routing and remote access for people to connect to our exchange server and have problems with thier connection. For some reason when people connect to the server they receive an error that their Microsoft exchange server is busy. To fix the problem they have to disconnect their network connection and reconnect to the vpn and then they can get into the exchange server. I set lmhosts file on every client pc to connect to the exchange server. Does anyone know how to resolve this problem. RGDS Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Contacts Public Folder problem
It seems that if we do a Find from OWA, E2k, SP2 in a Contacts Public Folder it only searches fields until it finds an entry and then stops searching on that contact. SharePoint 2001 E2k Public Folder content indexing has the same problem, but that makes sense since it uses the OWA to index it. Specifically, if there is a first and last name entered as well as a company name and you search for the company name, it will not find the contact. It will only find it if you search on the first or last name entered. If there is no name entered it will find the contact based on company name. Has anyone encountered this? Is there a way around it? TIA Best Regards, Dan Bartley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Not sure what the all the talk of take out the firewall is about. If it is via VPN, then you must have that open already. If not, it depends on what VPN you are using as to what ports you might need. After that it is just a matter of having the VPN server properly configured to hand the info to clients needed to see the machines on the network. Easiest is to set up a WINS server for VPN client use. Since it is via VPN you DO NOT have to open any NetBIOS ports or remove any firewall. I'm not sure why anyone would be recommending that. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone@;superioraccess.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook You may as well just take out the firewall if this is what you want to do. And no, im not joking. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener@;midship.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Does anyone know what port I would have to open on my sonic wall to let people browse the network over the vpn. If i bypass my firewall at home i can search for computers on my the network but if i dont i cannot find any computers rich\\\thanks > -Original Me> > ssage- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > Would you like me to give you an example? > > we are a hosting company. Customers connect to our Exchange > servers from all > over the world, from a variety of client OSes. Their machines are not > members of our domain. They can't possibly use our WINS. > > What would you do to allow their PCs to resolve the short name of our > Exchange server? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > No there aren't. There are times in which its easier than doing it a > different way, but that doesn't mean there are times in which > they must be > used. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:17 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > there are some situations when one must use HOSTS file. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely@;TripathImaging.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:07 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > Neither, use WINS and DNS, works every time... > > > > -Original Message- > > From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA@;AIIM.ORG] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener@;midship.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your > > exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it > works good. > > If you need > > more help dont hesitate to email me. > > > > rich > > > > -Original Message- > > From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon@;hotmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > Hi, folks: > > > > Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. > > Remote users have > > Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. > > > > These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and > > send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and > DSL, they > > can access our network, the internet and other network resources > > EXCEPT for > > their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure > > messages are > > related to "network problems preventing access to the > > Exchange server" or > > the RPC message box "retrieving data from Exchange server&qu
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
One other thing to check, if it hasn't been mentioned. Make the sure the DSL routers are not handing out the same private subnet space as the one you use for the exchange server. Exchange is the first place subnet routing confusion will show up. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener@;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 09:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon@;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to "network problems preventing access to the Exchange server" or the RPC message box "retrieving data from Exchange server". These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
I could not let this one pass. For the record, you better take a closer look at how you have installed Exchange and GroupShield and how things are managed in your network. Particularly if your description below is accurate. First off, why isn't your boot.ini read only? It is supposed to be. Second, why isn't your OS defaulting to the c:\winnt if the boot.ini can not be found, it is supposed to. Perhaps you installed to a non-default directory, that would be a good reason. Third, I've been using GroupShield 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 on numerous systems at several companies. Updates have failed many times and I have encountered many different annoying bugs, but never has it done even close to what you described below. Before you start making software changes and decisions, I suggest you re-evaluate your current management models and trouble shooting techniques first. Sorry for the terse tone, but there are many people new to this area reading these posts, and wild, irresponsible statements like below do not help others develop a professional edge. As far as what is best, as Andy David said, use what works for you. It all comes down to preferences on bugs and features. None of them are perfect, everyone has a different experience for each one. Test several, see what addresses the most of what you need and expect. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 18:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 I'll have a look at trend... Thanks for the info. For the record, we DID have an issue with Groupshield, and this goes out to ALL GROUPSHIELD USERS. There is a bug in Groupshield when used on an Exchange 2000 server. If the internet update fails (something quite normal as it's done daily over FTP, so it's bound to fail), it DELETES ALL NON-READ-ONLY FILES IN THE ROOT OF C:! That includes BOOT.INI. It happened to us twice on a live system, and once on a test system! Windows simply complains that it can't find NTOSKRNL.EXE and stops booting... We had to boot with the Win2K CD into the Recovery Console and manually copy a boot.ini file from another (similar) server to get it back up... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 11:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Heck, if it works for you and you have had success with it, stick with it. I have had bad experiences with McCrappy, and the upgrade price to the e-policy thing was more than just simply switching to Trend, with I really like. Ive also used Antigen, Symantec and ImNotGoingToScanIT, and of those , I have found Trend and Sybari the best, an opinion shared by many. BTW, once I switched to Trend, I rescanned and found viruses that McCrappy missed. YMMV. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 or GFI? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 How about Sybari or Trend? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
RE: Exchange SP2 and SP3 with Backup Exec 8.5
No problems for SP2, haven't put SP3 on a production box that is backed up yet. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange SP2 and SP3 with Backup Exec 8.5 Hi All, Is there any caveats that I should know of in regards to upgrading to Exchange Sp2 or SP3 and Veritas Backup Exec 8.5? I know that I should backup the database before and after the upgrade. Did anyone run into a problem backing the database using Backup Exec 8.5 with the Exchange 8.5 agent? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with www.cdolive.net
They are under reconstruction. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with www.cdolive.net Use cdolive.com. > -Original Message- > From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Problems with www.cdolive.net > > Anyone else having problems with www.cdolive.net? > > When I click on any icon, or select any menu, the page that comes up does > not have any items in the lists. For example, the > http://www.cdolive.net/exchange2000/ page shows nothing under Tutorials, > FAQs, etc. > > Is there an alternate web site? > > I'm trying to find more info on > http://www.cdolive.net/download/exchange2000messagefilterlist.zip. I can > download this file, but can't find any usage instructions, like the schema > for the XML file. > > Best Regards, > JMU > > > Jim Underwood > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025
In my case I did apply to a test server first. I got could not stop msexchangesa and could not restart iisadmin services. Not a problem, I stopped the Exchange services manually, it requires a reboot anyway so restarting at time of install is not important. I've had similar services stopping and starting issues with every Exchange patch for E2k. That's why I test first. So far, 4 hours into it, no performance problems or loss of services on the test box. That's the important part. If it continues to be ok under load then I will apply it to a production server, after stopping all services manually first (something I learned to do as far back as 4.0). The important part is that I know what to expect when I apply the patch in production and that makes for a smooth transition and minimum downtime. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 17:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Hoooya! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:06 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 "Customers are advised to review the bulletin and *test* and deploy the patch in their environments, if applicable" -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Patch was unable to restart 'msexchangesa' and 'msexchangeis' automatically. Rebooted and all appears to be fine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:13 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Subject: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-025 Title: Malformed Mail Attribute can Cause Exchange 2000 to Exhaust CPU Resources (Q320436) Date: May 29, 2002 Software: Microsoft Exchange 2000 Impact: Denial of Service Maximum Severity Rating: Critical Bulletin: MS02-025 The Microsoft Security Response Center has released Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-025 What Is It? The Microsoft Security Response Center has released Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-025 which concerns a vulnerability found in Microsoft Exchange 2000. Customers are advised to review the bulletin and test and deploy the patch in their environments, if applicable More information is now available at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-025.asp <http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-025.asp> If you have any questions regarding the patch or its implementation after reading the above listed bulletin you should contact Product Support Services in the United States at 1-866-PCSafety (1-866-727-2338). International customers should contact their local subsidiary. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--> Save 30% on Web addresses! Get with the times, get a web site. Share information, pictures, your hobby, or start a business. Great names are still available- get yours before someone else does! http://us.click.yahoo.com/XmK3jA/nFGEAA/sXBHAA/8vOslB/TM -~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or ema
RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
Depends on whether you have the Application Pack. Just MOM alone will do nothing for you with Ex5.5. It will monitor the Win2k OS out of the box. The agent is well behaved in 99% of the environments. I haven't tried against Ex5.5, but it can have some issues with certain report scripts on E2k with App Pack. It does not bring the box down in one test arena, it just does not function consistently with the mailbox needed for Exchange reporting functions. I regularly have to restart the agent service to get a script to complete on one test arena. In another, it just won't work with the mailbox most of the time, no matter what I do. This is with the App Pack. It works fine on the OS, SQL, etc. In one of the test arenas, the WMI service regularly runs away with the CPU, due directly to the failure of the Exchange scripts. In the other one, it does not, it just fails to complete the scripts without restarting the agent. The biggest thing about MOM is to be sure you assign computer groups to the rule sets, or you'll get nothing, and be very careful what you decide to pull from the logs and scripts. The database will get very large, very quickly. Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager I'm concerned with the agent and the overhead. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager > > The agent or the application and databases and $tonofotheroverhead? > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:40 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager > > > > > > Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server? I have > > Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a Windows 2000 server sp2. I am > > also running Trend Micro virus scan and content filter 3.52 > > and 3.11 respectively on it. I have no issues with the > > server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about > > installing Microsoft Operations Manager on it. My contention > > is that I don't know enough about MOM to know the impact it > > may have on Exchange. Anyone have any thoughts on this? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dot Harris > > William Blair & Company > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange server
My experience has been there is always a reason for this. It has varied. Sometimes it is network latency problems on the client, sometimes a bad switch or hub. On the old Exchange server it was because of the topology of the dual domain causing latency in passing the communication between them. It was never the server itself except once when it was down. I would be looking at the above possibilities before the server. Even if you get rid of the message people are going to experience delays in getting the data they are trying to access in Outlook. It is still requesting data from the server slow enough for that message, even if you don't see the message. In my case it has most often been a switch acting up. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange server I would pop over to Slipstick. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange server Yes, but it still shows up in the task bar. Is there a reg hack to completely eliminate it? - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: RE: Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange server > Isnt there a checkbox on that message box that allows you to always minimize > it? > We are talking Outlook 2002 here right? > > > -Original Message- > From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:48 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Fw: Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange server > > > I have looked all over, PLEASE point me in the right direction to turn this > off. Or what it's called. > > Thanks, > - John Q > > - Original Message - > From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:31 PM > Subject: Re: Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange server > > > Just turn it off in Outlook. The your users can whine because OL isn't > responding. > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:17 PM > Subject: Fw: Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange server > > > I continue to get this message, see Subject line. I am lost at this point. > I have checked the performance on the server, Processor, memory, network > communications. > Even checked Queues. Everything looks good. Including no error inthe Event > log at all. > But users continue to get the popup message "Requesting Data from > Microsoft > Exchange server" > What else can I do to troubleshoot this issue. Are there any utilities > that someone can suggest to help me out. > > - John Q Jr. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
RE: System Manager for XP Pro?
One little caveat though, upgrade ESM to SP2 before upgrading the adminpak to beta 3. Otherwise, the same problem. Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 21:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Too obvious, I guess. Never even thought to continue anyway with the Win2k adminpak, even though I do it all the time with other apps. That did it. It installed by this method and everything works fine. Thank you very much. Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? My understanding is that you need to install the 2K adminpak, install it even tho it warns about not being compatible. Then install ESM, then install .Net adminpak. ESM will not install unless the 2k tools are there. Then the >net tools should overwrite the 2k tools after you install ESM. Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe you still get the error, but it will install. I am certainly open to correction. William -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Hmm. I installed the adminpak.msi from Windows.NET beta3 on XP Pro and I still get the "You need to have Windows 2000 Administration Tools" error when I try to install Exchange2000 ESM. I even did it 3 times. Am I missing something? Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Say that three times fast: Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe this is currently unsupported. Some people have successfully deployed the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then installed the Exchange2000 ESM, but this is also not supported. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Manager for XP Pro? Hi All, Anyone know if there is a version of Exchange Manager for Windows XP Professional? I tried doing the install from the Exchange 2000 CD but it warns of needing the Windows 2000 Support Tools. I do have the Admin Tools for XP installed, but obviously that's not enough. Thanks, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: System Manager for XP Pro?
Too obvious, I guess. Never even thought to continue anyway with the Win2k adminpak, even though I do it all the time with other apps. That did it. It installed by this method and everything works fine. Thank you very much. Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? My understanding is that you need to install the 2K adminpak, install it even tho it warns about not being compatible. Then install ESM, then install .Net adminpak. ESM will not install unless the 2k tools are there. Then the >net tools should overwrite the 2k tools after you install ESM. Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe you still get the error, but it will install. I am certainly open to correction. William -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Hmm. I installed the adminpak.msi from Windows.NET beta3 on XP Pro and I still get the "You need to have Windows 2000 Administration Tools" error when I try to install Exchange2000 ESM. I even did it 3 times. Am I missing something? Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Say that three times fast: Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe this is currently unsupported. Some people have successfully deployed the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then installed the Exchange2000 ESM, but this is also not supported. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Manager for XP Pro? Hi All, Anyone know if there is a version of Exchange Manager for Windows XP Professional? I tried doing the install from the Exchange 2000 CD but it warns of needing the Windows 2000 Support Tools. I do have the Admin Tools for XP installed, but obviously that's not enough. Thanks, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: System Manager for XP Pro?
Yes, that is a fine option, but not always the most convenient in all circumstances (this could just be one of those preference areas). However, it can work as I mention in a reply to a later post on this. Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] INTRASYS Network Technologies LAN/WAN, Exchange and Windows 2000 Specialists -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Terminal server is the answer. Go use it. Don't bother with it on your WS. With terminal server you can get to it from anywhere. Much more functional then having it installed on your WS./ Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dan Bartley Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Hmm. I installed the adminpak.msi from Windows.NET beta3 on XP Pro and I still get the "You need to have Windows 2000 Administration Tools" error when I try to install Exchange2000 ESM. I even did it 3 times. Am I missing something? Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Say that three times fast: Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe this is currently unsupported. Some people have successfully deployed the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then installed the Exchange2000 ESM, but this is also not supported. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Manager for XP Pro? Hi All, Anyone know if there is a version of Exchange Manager for Windows XP Professional? I tried doing the install from the Exchange 2000 CD but it warns of needing the Windows 2000 Support Tools. I do have the Admin Tools for XP installed, but obviously that's not enough. Thanks, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: System Manager for XP Pro?
Correction. It clears the selection for ESM after the error. Read my reply to a later suggestion though. Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe you still get the error, but it will install. I am certainly open to correction. William -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Hmm. I installed the adminpak.msi from Windows.NET beta3 on XP Pro and I still get the "You need to have Windows 2000 Administration Tools" error when I try to install Exchange2000 ESM. I even did it 3 times. Am I missing something? Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Say that three times fast: Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe this is currently unsupported. Some people have successfully deployed the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then installed the Exchange2000 ESM, but this is also not supported. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Manager for XP Pro? Hi All, Anyone know if there is a version of Exchange Manager for Windows XP Professional? I tried doing the install from the Exchange 2000 CD but it warns of needing the Windows 2000 Support Tools. I do have the Admin Tools for XP installed, but obviously that's not enough. Thanks, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: System Manager for XP Pro?
Hmm. I installed the adminpak.msi from Windows.NET beta3 on XP Pro and I still get the "You need to have Windows 2000 Administration Tools" error when I try to install Exchange2000 ESM. I even did it 3 times. Am I missing something? Dan Bartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? Say that three times fast: Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM Deploy the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then install the Exchange2000 ESM -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: System Manager for XP Pro? I believe this is currently unsupported. Some people have successfully deployed the adminpak.msi from Windows.net beta3 on XP Pro, then installed the Exchange2000 ESM, but this is also not supported. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: System Manager for XP Pro? Hi All, Anyone know if there is a version of Exchange Manager for Windows XP Professional? I tried doing the install from the Exchange 2000 CD but it warns of needing the Windows 2000 Support Tools. I do have the Admin Tools for XP installed, but obviously that's not enough. Thanks, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Login?
For us, if you logon to the desktop with the same account info as the account that owns the mailbox and the site is seen by the browser as in the Intranet zone, no prompt. Just goes directly in to the mailbox. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 08:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Login? Sorry - but shouldn't the same hold true here? I just added the site to intranet. Still showed the login prompt - with my password saved and filled in. Added the site to TRUSTED and same results. -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Login? Perhaps she used the same login info as her domain account and has the Internet Options set to see the site as Intranet? Normally, OWA will not prompt if you logged on to the desktop with the same account info as the account that owns the mailbox and the browser views the site as an Intranet location. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 08:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Login? On her home computer, she reinstalled windows/office/etc...wiped it clean. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Login? By "re-did her home computer", what do you mean? Sounds like some pass-through authentication going on... -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Login? Morning, I have an interesting dilemma. Running E2k. One of my employees recently redid her home computer. Now when she goes to check her email from home using OWA, she is not prompted for username / password - it takes her straight to her inbox. She has DSL/Cable. I thought perhaps she had 'saved' her username and password, but on my home computer, the login box still appears - just filled out. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. If you checks her email at a different machine - she is prompted. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler & Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Login?
Perhaps she used the same login info as her domain account and has the Internet Options set to see the site as Intranet? Normally, OWA will not prompt if you logged on to the desktop with the same account info as the account that owns the mailbox and the browser views the site as an Intranet location. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 08:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Login? On her home computer, she reinstalled windows/office/etc...wiped it clean. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Login? By "re-did her home computer", what do you mean? Sounds like some pass-through authentication going on... -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Login? Morning, I have an interesting dilemma. Running E2k. One of my employees recently redid her home computer. Now when she goes to check her email from home using OWA, she is not prompted for username / password - it takes her straight to her inbox. She has DSL/Cable. I thought perhaps she had 'saved' her username and password, but on my home computer, the login box still appears - just filled out. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. If you checks her email at a different machine - she is prompted. Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler & Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird Error
It did. And their server replied to your server which then passed back to the sender as to the results it received. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 14:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Error But why wouldn't it just send it to MSN, and then have the MSN Sys Admin send me a message telling me the account doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird Error Because your server tried to send the mail and it failed with user unknown. MSN thought you'd like to know. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird Error My boss sent an e-mail to a msn.com account. but this is the error message he received back. Why would this becoming from my System Administrator? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Sent: 1/4/2002 2:06 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 1/4/2002 2:06 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Finlay Fine Jewe;l=MAIL-MO-1-020104190541Z-15960 MSEXCH:IMS:Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.:FINLAY-NATION:MAIL-MO-1 3550 (000B09AA) 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Policing the Police
I don't see the 1016 anymore in E2k. It makes a security log entry for failed object access instead. Unfortunately, this makes it difficult to monitor as many things cause a failed object access, with the same Event ID. Did I miss a setting somewhere that restores the 1016 entry in the application log or is it just gone now? Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 15:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Policing the Police Any access to any mailbox that is not "your" primary mailbox will be logged in the event viewer no matter how it is accessed and no matter what Outlook client you use. D "The secret to success is - find out where the people are going and get there first". (Mark Twain) -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Policing the Police That hasn't been my experience. Did you confirm that when just checking a person's availability? If so, my apologies for that misleading tidbit... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Policing the Police All versions of Outlook will cause this event to be logged. - Original Message - From: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:38 PM Subject: RE: Policing the Police > Just a note that Outlook 2002 clients who check another user's > free/busy will cause event 1016 to be written to the application log, > as well. > > Louise > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:09 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Policing the Police > > The event log will automatically log any access to mailbox that is not your > own. > > -Original Message- > From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Policing the Police > > > Sorry... activity such as permission changes on mailboxes and access > to mailboxes when not the owner (aside from system or AV access) > > Stu > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM 4.5 for Exchange?
Has anyone heard anything about a timetable for release of IM client 4.5 for Exchange? The Windows update site has a link and paragraph about the Exchange version, but it takes you to the 3.5 version download page. Thanks for any info. Best Regards, Dan Bartley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Instant Messenger
4.5 is not yet supported for an E2k configuration. Although the XP Windows update site supplies a link for a 4.5 Exchange version, it goes to the 3.5 version page. The 4.0 version that installs with XP will only work if you are upgrading a Win2k machine that already had the Exchange version installed. Having it on the same server as E2k can be problematic. There is an update that can be had from PSS, no charge, that resolves some of the authentication problems with AD with a same server setup. The best solution is to run the IM from another server. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Instant Messenger Has anyone successfully setup and configured IM with Exchange 2000 on W2K? I am just starting out with the installation and am getting lost in the process. I have IM installed and active on the 2000 server. I installed the IM client (3.5) on the same W2K box and I get all sorts of authentication errors. I am trying to connect with a valid email address and password. I also would like to know how it will work with XP and Messenger 4.5. (http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q307/8/87.asp?LN=EN-US &SD=gn&FR=0&qry=messenger%20service&rnk=14&src=DHCS_MSPSS_gn_SRCH&SPR=WI NXP#3) This looks pretty close, but I don't have the same options. As you can tell I am extremely new the IM world. Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IM
Yep, that too. Turns out to probably be related to the dsaccess.dll. Best Regards, Dan Bartley Senior MIS Manager NetCarrier Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netcarrier.com Direct Phone: 215.966.3310 -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 23:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IM That first question is a rhetorical one, right? Ironically, getting rid of the RVP record can often work wonders. Try that. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Bartley Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IM Has anyone successfully got IM for E2k to consistently run without the authentication failure problem? I've tried every KB article I could find on it and nothing seems to keep it consistently working. E2k, SP1, Win2k AS, SP2. Nothing else on the box, not a domain controller. Have the resource record. Tried host header change, alias. Can't seem to get it to consistently work. Client is the SP1 3.5 version. No other version installed over it. TIA for any thoughts. Best Regards, Dan Bartley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IM
I believe I found the problem... It is apparently Post SP1 as it requires SP1 to use. KB Article Q303991 Fits my circumstances. Didn't see this the first time I searched. It's all in how you ask :-) Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message----- From: Dan Bartley Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 19:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IM Yep, did that. Can get it working for a bit and then it just dies for authentication. I've had this problem before on other servers. Gave up on it, now I'm trying to make a serious go of it again in the hopes SP1 helped. If I completely blow away the virtual server and then re-create, sometimes it will start working again for a while or it takes several attempts of re-creating before it works again. Eventually, it starts having the same problem again. Best Regards, Dan Bartley Senior MIS Manager NetCarrier Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netcarrier.com Direct Phone: 215.966.3310 -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IM Yes, I've implemented it several times, with either IP or host head configuration. Make sure after you have the IM installed. Restart the WWW service, and restart IM Vitual Server site, even if they both are showing running... Andrew, MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IM Has anyone successfully got IM for E2k to consistently run without the authentication failure problem? I've tried every KB article I could find on it and nothing seems to keep it consistently working. E2k, SP1, Win2k AS, SP2. Nothing else on the box, not a domain controller. Have the resource record. Tried host header change, alias. Can't seem to get it to consistently work. Client is the SP1 3.5 version. No other version installed over it. TIA for any thoughts. Best Regards, Dan Bartley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IM
Yep, did that. Can get it working for a bit and then it just dies for authentication. I've had this problem before on other servers. Gave up on it, now I'm trying to make a serious go of it again in the hopes SP1 helped. If I completely blow away the virtual server and then re-create, sometimes it will start working again for a while or it takes several attempts of re-creating before it works again. Eventually, it starts having the same problem again. Best Regards, Dan Bartley Senior MIS Manager NetCarrier Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netcarrier.com Direct Phone: 215.966.3310 -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IM Yes, I've implemented it several times, with either IP or host head configuration. Make sure after you have the IM installed. Restart the WWW service, and restart IM Vitual Server site, even if they both are showing running... Andrew, MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IM Has anyone successfully got IM for E2k to consistently run without the authentication failure problem? I've tried every KB article I could find on it and nothing seems to keep it consistently working. E2k, SP1, Win2k AS, SP2. Nothing else on the box, not a domain controller. Have the resource record. Tried host header change, alias. Can't seem to get it to consistently work. Client is the SP1 3.5 version. No other version installed over it. TIA for any thoughts. Best Regards, Dan Bartley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM
Has anyone successfully got IM for E2k to consistently run without the authentication failure problem? I've tried every KB article I could find on it and nothing seems to keep it consistently working. E2k, SP1, Win2k AS, SP2. Nothing else on the box, not a domain controller. Have the resource record. Tried host header change, alias. Can't seem to get it to consistently work. Client is the SP1 3.5 version. No other version installed over it. TIA for any thoughts. Best Regards, Dan Bartley _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
