RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
Btw - searching on "c1041722 Microsoft Active Directory" in google results in more hits -Original Message----- From: David J. Culliton Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... 2 hits on the error message... http://www.bestsoft.ch/Software/microsoft/exchange/helpfiles/minpermi.ht m http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314294 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Of course.I would never ask the list first without searching first. (just kidding). Yes, I did do a search on thatnothing. Just wondering if anyone has seen this before or knows a resolution. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Did you do a search on that error message? - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:11 PM Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... from California. to the New York Island... I am really enjoying your humor, however, do you have any ideas about my question. Thanks and always laughing, Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... This Lan is your Lan. This Lan is my Lan. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:49 PM Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... No. On company LAN -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Over dialup? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Looking up "c1041722" in Technet yields a number of hits. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:24 PM Subject: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Hello All. Still having a problem viewing Mailbox Rights for users. When I click on the Mailbox Rights... button under the Exchange Advanced tab, I get the following error: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service could not find the specified object ID no: c1041722 Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension Any ideas? Please help. Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.spark
RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
2 hits on the error message... http://www.bestsoft.ch/Software/microsoft/exchange/helpfiles/minpermi.ht m http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314294 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Of course.I would never ask the list first without searching first. (just kidding). Yes, I did do a search on thatnothing. Just wondering if anyone has seen this before or knows a resolution. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Did you do a search on that error message? - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:11 PM Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... from California. to the New York Island... I am really enjoying your humor, however, do you have any ideas about my question. Thanks and always laughing, Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... This Lan is your Lan. This Lan is my Lan. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:49 PM Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... No. On company LAN -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Over dialup? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Looking up "c1041722" in Technet yields a number of hits. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:24 PM Subject: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Hello All. Still having a problem viewing Mailbox Rights for users. When I click on the Mailbox Rights... button under the Exchange Advanced tab, I get the following error: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service could not find the specified object ID no: c1041722 Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension Any ideas? Please help. Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] E
RE: Strange Question
If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few > minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of > request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, > respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then > it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two > willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants > it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the > person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on > > his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds > > until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > > > > Tell your boss you
RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server
That would not necessarily be true. Don't know about your firewall(s) but most operate on the principle of if not allowed than deny. My question would be if the ip is not the same as the old computer (Did not see it stated anywhere)- is the ip allowed access through the firewall to the exchange server on the given ports? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server wouldn't be our firewalls, because he can use other PCs in his office to connect with MAPI just fine. -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server I would check the firewalls on both ends of the connection. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server HOSTS file. The new ones have the HOSTS file too with the correct settings. He can do a regular ping, by server name, and it replies. Something is killing the RPCs though. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server Do the old PC's perhaps have a host file or a static route setup on them to your server? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have a customer who has been connecting to our Exchange servers just fine with MAPI Outlook, across the Internet. They have been receiving new PCs from Dell that are already preconfigured with Windows XP SP1. And for some reason users on those PCs cannot connect to Exchange anymore. I asked him to check the XP's built-in firewall. He says it is disabled. I did an RPC Ping test with him. From old PCs RPC Ping worked fine. But it failed on the new XP SP1 PCs. What else could there be wrong with XP SP1 that would kill RPCs? Thanks for any ideas! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BE 9
I am using it now. It shaved about 20% off our typical enterprise backup times. I like the ability to modify the order in which my machines are backup up. If 8.6 had it - I never found it... I also like the interface better. -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BE 9 Anyone upgrading to Backup Exec 9.0 It looks like it has some real good advantages and I am just looking for some opinions Rob Weatherly _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
~25 Gig (E2k) Backup Exec and exabyte ez17/m2 autoloader -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Pete, We have about ~55 gb or so (Exchange 2k w/3 storage groups) Using Backup Exec and a Compaq TL890 Storage Library. === Arron S. King Network & Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are using? Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and NT backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and attack by Chinese?!?
Deja search points to code red... http://groups.google.com/groups?q=page+has+been+hacked+by+chinese&ie=UTF -8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and attack by Chinese?!? Running Exchange 5.5 on Win2K server, latest service packs. Users over weekend accessed using OWA. Got message at sign on "page has been hacked by Chinese." After that page wouldn't come up. Problem cleared when we rebooted server. Please advise. TIA Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Suppressing the "envelope"
May be different for other versions but in XP : Tools\Options\Preferences\Email Options\Advanced - There is a check box for incoming mail notification on the system tray. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suppressing the "envelope" I've looked for this off and on an never had any luck finding it. Now we have an application server that is being shared, and folks are complaining that the envelop icon is appearing multiple times when they use Outlook via this server. Here's the question: Is there some way to suppress the envelope icon that shows up in the task bar when new mail comes in? Many thanks! Darcy Adams Sr. Exchange Administrator Getty Images 601 N. 34th Street Seattle, WA 98103 Tel 206-925-6617 Cell 206-255-0169 http://www.gettyimages.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Nice thought perhaps but it won't help those users running any OS other than 2000 and XP -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Something like MAPI over http as announced for Outlook 11? Maybe, but given the large install base of Outlook 97 still out there, it would seem that an investment in VPN today would have reasonable utility over the lifespan of the hardware used to run it. > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 1:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > Hypothetically, if Microsoft came out with new technology > that would make MAPI obsolete (something like > front-end/back-end OWA with all the features of Outlook), > would you then toss out the VPN and stop charging customers for it? > > I am still hoping that something like this will be available, > but then if I invest in VPN technologies it would be a waste of money. > > > -Original Message- > From: Julian Stone [mailto:julian.stone@;netstore.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > We also "allow" Mapi across the internet, but with VPN > systems for those customers who are willing to pay for the > added security. > > Some customers have even requested & got non HTTPS OWA > access, where their password is sent in clear text !! > > Yours, > > Julian Stone > Exchange 2000 Consultant and Webmaster > > Sent from Microsoft Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.4 > > Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider > > Tel:+44 (0) 1344 444349 > Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312 > Fax:+44 (0) 207 681 1238 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm > HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/ > > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: 30 October 2002 17:22 pm > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > Been like this for 2 years now. > > Of course I always look for ways to make it better and safer. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > When your goal is to sell as many seats as possible @ $9.95 > each, you cut corners and customers get what they pay for. > Welcome to the wonderful world of capitalism. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely@;TripathImaging.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:44 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > But as an ASP wouldn't you just charge more for the > services??? Maybe > > I'm just being blind, but I would think one would want to provide a > > more secure solution. Of course, added costs go with that > solution, > > but one would apply those costs to their clients I would think... > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:44 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > I can seee some instances where the support costs related > to helping > > Windows 95 users install and configure VPN might make an > ASP shudder. > > InnerHost is certainly not the only ASP to provide Exchange > access in > > that manner. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely@;TripathImaging.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:14 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > > > > I would disagree with that... A VPN solution with a > RADIUS server > > > would fit your needs quite well... > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:13 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > > > > MAPI across the Internet. Please no flames. There is no VPN > > that would > > > be universal enough for all kinds of customers. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely@;TripathImaging.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:28 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > > > > How do they connect? VPN, Direct Dial?? > > > > > > Are these users POPing their email? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:12 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook > > > > > > > > > Would you like me to give you an example? > > > > > > we are a hosting company. Customers connect to ou
RE: Exchange 2000 Log Files
What type of backup is being performed? http://seer.support.veritas.com/search_forms/SearchFrame.asp?SearchTerm= Exchange%20log&Path=seer%2esupport%2everitas%2ecom%2fdocs%2f240517%2ehtm -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Log Files First you should upgrade to 8.6 + the latest build. Is the Exchange job part of another backup job or separate backup job of only the Exchange Server? -Original Message- From: Matt Usher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Log Files I'm not sure if this is the right list. If not, please point me to an appropriate place. We have an Exchange2000 server running with SP2. The Exchange Database is on one drive (G: - RAID 5) The Exchange Logs are on another drive (L: - RAID 0) Backup Exec 8.5 installed We are running out of space on the L: drive. The logs are not being flushed. We run a daily incremental backup and a weekly full backup. After the backup finishes, the logs are not being flushed. I have looked at the Backup Exec log and the backup runs successfully, but just doesn't flush the logs. Any ideas? Pointers? Places to start? Thanks. Matt Usher _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Reminder on top
Q289970 for 2002 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Reminder on top Hmm. It's odd indeed. I created three test appointments and paid attention and the reminder didn't pop up the first time (it was minimized like all other Outlook windows). Then I restored it and dismissed it. Kept working on non-Outlook apps and the next two reminders actually popped up on top of everything. So it may be that the first reminder when Outlook is minimized appears minimized, but if you restore that and then dismiss it any consecutive reminders pop up on top. BTW, I'm running Outlook 2002 on XP Pro connecting to Exchange 5.5 backend. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Reminder on top yep did that, i combed the outlook 2000 options with a fine tooth comb. The only options for reminder is a global on off, and a individual on off. Not much else. Apparently since i sent my original email the user told me that this use to work with Schedule+ and the Exchange 5.5 client but since he moved to Outlook this has not worked. e- -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Reminder on top That's gotta be a client side setting. You may need to tickle the reminder options in Outlook. I remember seeing a "Display reminder" checkbox. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Reminder on top This is a dumb question, but does anyone know where there might be a setting to have the calendar appointment reminder show up on top of all apps? I have a user who swears he could minimize his Outlook 2000 and be working in SQL and when it was meeting time the reminder would pop up on top of SQL or whatever else he was in. I cant get it to work, best it does it appear in the taskbar flashing. I've checked Oreily, the companion for 5.5, the gerber mastering book, and the MS knowledge base. I've tried the outlook.exe /cleanreminders. Client is Outlook 2k in a Exchange 5.5 site. many thanks. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
After the 3rd or 4th tech there was a manager involved (at least he represented himself as such). There were a total of 9 people involved over the period in question. I made an (erroneous in hindsight) assumption that things were being tossed to people who could get a handle on what needed to be done. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 03/11/2002 6:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... Seven months on an open case? And you never demanded escalation? Or to talk to a manager? - Original Message - From: "David J. Culliton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:37 PM Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... I can't agree on their "excellence". They do have their days. I had PSS working on an exchange/Ad issue which was ad locking up every 3 weeks to the day. They blamed the Backup Exec Remote for having a leak but when it was removed the necessary reboots continued. They had this issue opened from 10/27/2000-5/01/2001 when they closed it - unresolved. When I requested the case be reopened 3 weeks later I was given the runaround. When I requested it 3 weeks after that I was told it could not be reopened as it had been closed for more than 30 days. They required additional payment to reopen it as a new case. Service packs have helped increase the time frame between reboots but I don't have much faith in their people or policies... YMMV -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... They better not.. Or I will drive up there and Burn their campus down. PSS is one of the those things that they do with extreme excellence. This second and soon to be Third generation of Microsoft employee is starting to be way to manager money oriented.. They better not Change PSS. Is this why you and Dean left Daniel? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... I'll have to agree. Up until fairly recently, whenever I called PSS, I got the help I needed irregardless and the call would stay open until I was happy. The last time I called, I was firmly told that once the problem crossed from an E2K install issue to an AD issue, I'd have to open a new call. At the time, I just assumed it was the tech I was working with. However, after reading this thread, I'm beginning to think MS is changing their PSS strategy a bit... -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... ..since many of us call pss from time to time - there was this time when i was attempting to add another DC to my network, and while working on the ADS-related issue, the Server blue screened on a boot. I was transferred to a hardware guy, who told me to do what i suspected, (boot w/ a floppy pointing to the mirror) and continued to work on the DS issue. He specifically said he wouldn't help with the blue screen issue unless it was another case. Maybe this guy was lazy, I dunno. By the way, I'm not attacking PSS - I've had a number of terrific experiences with them under stressful situations. Jeremy -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS? I just retired from MS after eight years in support. I know what I'm talking about. You called in with a specific issue. As long as you're not presenting a laundry list of issues that case is not close
RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
I could agree as to it being something I had done if they had found something out of the ordinary. Everything they tried turned up normal results. The 5/1 closure was after they took a performance log dump and said it was BE. Veritas of course brought it back to MS. What I respectfully disagree with is the "Months Of work for a few hundred" statement. I don't consider that time frame to be out of line when you consider that every change required a 3 week period to determine if it was "the Fix". In the 28 week period we made 9 changes to the machine. A Dll here, reboot , 3 weeks etc... etc... etc... I won't belabor the point beyond YMMV. I have had them resolve other issues very quickly and with outstanding results through 5.5 and 2000. This issue was not one of them. -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... You were expecting them to perform months worth of work for a few hundred dollars? As to the problem, since very few if any others have it, maybe the fault should be looked at as something that you've done. -----Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:38 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... I can't agree on their "excellence". They do have their days. I had PSS working on an exchange/Ad issue which was ad locking up every 3 weeks to the day. They blamed the Backup Exec Remote for having a leak but when it was removed the necessary reboots continued. They had this issue opened from 10/27/2000-5/01/2001 when they closed it - unresolved. When I requested the case be reopened 3 weeks later I was given the runaround. When I requested it 3 weeks after that I was told it could not be reopened as it had been closed for more than 30 days. They required additional payment to reopen it as a new case. Service packs have helped increase the time frame between reboots but I don't have much faith in their people or policies... YMMV -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... They better not.. Or I will drive up there and Burn their campus down. PSS is one of the those things that they do with extreme excellence. This second and soon to be Third generation of Microsoft employee is starting to be way to manager money oriented.. They better not Change PSS. Is this why you and Dean left Daniel? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... I'll have to agree. Up until fairly recently, whenever I called PSS, I got the help I needed irregardless and the call would stay open until I was happy. The last time I called, I was firmly told that once the problem crossed from an E2K install issue to an AD issue, I'd have to open a new call. At the time, I just assumed it was the tech I was working with. However, after reading this thread, I'm beginning to think MS is changing their PSS strategy a bit... -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... ..since many of us call pss from time to time - there was this time when i was attempting to add another DC to my network, and while working on the ADS-related issue, the Server blue screened on a boot. I was transferred to a hardware guy, who told me to do what i suspected, (boot w/ a floppy pointing to the mirror) and continued to work on the DS issue. He specifically said he wouldn't help with the blue screen issue unless it was another case. Maybe this guy was lazy, I dunno. By the way, I'm not attacking PSS - I've had a number of terrific experiences with them under stressful situations. Jeremy -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS? I just retired from MS after eight years in support. I know what I'm talking about. You called in with a specific issue. As long as you're not presenting a laundry list of issues that case is not closed until that specific issue is resolved. That it may need to go to another group is irrelevant. - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Pinquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions"
RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
I can't agree on their "excellence". They do have their days. I had PSS working on an exchange/Ad issue which was ad locking up every 3 weeks to the day. They blamed the Backup Exec Remote for having a leak but when it was removed the necessary reboots continued. They had this issue opened from 10/27/2000-5/01/2001 when they closed it - unresolved. When I requested the case be reopened 3 weeks later I was given the runaround. When I requested it 3 weeks after that I was told it could not be reopened as it had been closed for more than 30 days. They required additional payment to reopen it as a new case. Service packs have helped increase the time frame between reboots but I don't have much faith in their people or policies... YMMV -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... They better not.. Or I will drive up there and Burn their campus down. PSS is one of the those things that they do with extreme excellence. This second and soon to be Third generation of Microsoft employee is starting to be way to manager money oriented.. They better not Change PSS. Is this why you and Dean left Daniel? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... I'll have to agree. Up until fairly recently, whenever I called PSS, I got the help I needed irregardless and the call would stay open until I was happy. The last time I called, I was firmly told that once the problem crossed from an E2K install issue to an AD issue, I'd have to open a new call. At the time, I just assumed it was the tech I was working with. However, after reading this thread, I'm beginning to think MS is changing their PSS strategy a bit... -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but... ..since many of us call pss from time to time - there was this time when i was attempting to add another DC to my network, and while working on the ADS-related issue, the Server blue screened on a boot. I was transferred to a hardware guy, who told me to do what i suspected, (boot w/ a floppy pointing to the mirror) and continued to work on the DS issue. He specifically said he wouldn't help with the blue screen issue unless it was another case. Maybe this guy was lazy, I dunno. By the way, I'm not attacking PSS - I've had a number of terrific experiences with them under stressful situations. Jeremy -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS? I just retired from MS after eight years in support. I know what I'm talking about. You called in with a specific issue. As long as you're not presenting a laundry list of issues that case is not closed until that specific issue is resolved. That it may need to go to another group is irrelevant. - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Pinquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:58 PM Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? nope, i've tried to finagle them before - they're pretty specific about what they'll fix on an issue. Generally if they have to transfer you to another group, unless the problem is directly related, they'll not really help you out. ymmv i suppose. jeremy -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS? Why another 245 quatloos? The case is open until _you_ say it's fixed. - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Pinquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:39 PM Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? I had the same thing during a support call earlier today. (getting a 'ghosted' 5.5 server out of my 2000 environment, for all who care) I'm still having the same problem with event id 1706 (see below) which i've found numerous posts in usenet asking about, and no one seems to know anything about it. Missy even replied to one of them with a question, but the original poster never wrote back. MS wouldn't help without another 245 buckeroos, so i'm on my own. any help? (Win2k SP2, E2k SP1) Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeTransport Event Category: SMTP Protocol Event ID: 1706 Date: 3/11/2002 Time: 2:23:35 PM User: N/A Computer: MAILBOX Description: EXPS is temporarily unable to provide protocol security with "MAIL.bergen.cc.nj.us". "CSessionContext::OnEXPSInNegotiate" called "HrServerNegotiateAuth" wh
RE: Outlook Client Question
Can't recall which OS's this affects but if I remember correctly - hibernation/suspend can cause the network connection to not reestablish correctly upon the system being brought back on line. Don't know if this is what you are seeing but tis possible... May want to check the MS KB for hibernation issues... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Client Question I have an Outlook user that is putting his laptop into hibernation mode everyday. When he does this, his secretary realized that when she was entering appointments on his calendar he was not seeing them until after he synchronizes. I am wondering if anyone knows any issue between hibernation mode and outlook. I have the president of the company also complaining that after he comes up from hibernation mode and selects any of his mailbox folders with the exception of the inbox, it says "unable to display the folder". If he shuts Outlook and re-opens it, it begins to work again. It's obvious that hibernation is causing the problem however, I do not have an explanation for why. I would like to tell them not to use the feature however, these are high level users. Anyone that can shed some light into the problem would be nice as to why it acts so weird. LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send AS - No NDR Returned
No... It is a mail enabled user -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send AS - No NDR Returned Is the account he's sending as a public folder by chance? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message----- > From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:19 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Send AS - No NDR Returned > > > Having an issue in that when a user sends an email with > attachments he receives no NDR in response. If he sends it > as himself - he gets the NDR. The NDR is not generated to > him or the account he is sending as. Searched MSKB and > returned nothing related to this issue. W2k SP2 Ex2000 SP1. > Any ideas? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send AS - No NDR Returned
Having an issue in that when a user sends an email with attachments he receives no NDR in response. If he sends it as himself - he gets the NDR. The NDR is not generated to him or the account he is sending as. Searched MSKB and returned nothing related to this issue. W2k SP2 Ex2000 SP1. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: File system in outlook/exchange
But you can certainly have a File system shortcut that you drag attachments to. You can't maneuver through both at the same time. It works relatively well as long as you are dropping the attachment without having to maneuver through the directory tree -Original Message- From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: File system in outlook/exchange If Outlook = File system Then something = wrong You can have you boss's outlook bar shortcuts have his personal folders but i dont think you can have your email and file system open at the same time -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: File system in outlook/exchange Outlook != File System - Original Message - From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: File system in outlook/exchange Ok I was just speaking to my boss and he told me that he wants a new server as a file server. He wants to use outlook 2000 as a file system. He doest want to have it stored in public folders he wants them stored in folder on the new file server. Ok so I looked at outlook and showed him that you can do this with the outlook bar, you know by going to other shortcuts. But of course there was a problem with that, he wants the least amount of steps as possible. Basically he wants to be able to see all of his outlook folders and messages as well as seeing all the shared networks folders on the file server in one window in outlooks application. He want to be able to drag and drop files from his inbox to a public share in one window. Has anyone ever seen anything out there that can do this to outlook. I went to slipstick.com but didn't find any tools their that has this feature. Thanks for your time. Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mac Outlook 2001
Don't touch any rules on the PC side. The mac side soes not appreciate it. -Original Message- From: Klindt, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mac Outlook 2001 I've done a sanity check with it and it seems to work as advertised. I've had it and Outlook 2002 on the same mailbox at the same time and nothing noticeably bad happened. tk -Original Message- From: Brannon, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mac Outlook 2001 Interesting! http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/outlook/outlook_default.asp I remember that at one time if a Windows Outlook user opened a Mac Outlook mailbox on Exchange 5.5, then the Mac client could no longer open the mailbox. Is this still an issue? With Mac Outlook 2001? Exchange 5.5 sp4? Thanks, Chip Brannon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
