RE: Allow access to attachments
Works better when you actually go to HKCU instead of HKLM. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allow access to attachments http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/getexe.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Allow access to attachments Grrr. I have seen this article before but I can not find it. I have the attachments locked down on my Outlook Clients. I have a user with a need to receive an attachment. I can not find the right article to un block an attachment type .exe or something like that. Can anyone point me the the f***ing article please. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allow access to attachments
Grrr. I have seen this article before but I can not find it. I have the attachments locked down on my Outlook Clients. I have a user with a need to receive an attachment. I can not find the right article to un block an attachment type .exe or something like that. Can anyone point me the the f***ing article please. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
I am not AD yet so I am only somewhat familiar with what you referenced. I conceide your point though. I accept my public flogging with only no regrets. I was under the wrong understanding that if you setup an internal DNS that was not Fully Qualified it would not be able to be spoofed externally and thus my internal email server would not be able to be some lonely kids relay toy or spam generator. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 Best practices recommend otherwise: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/ad/windows2000/plan/bpaddsgn.asp "As a best practice use DNS names registered with an Internet authority in the Active Directory namespace. Only registered names are guaranteed to be globally unique. If another organization later registers the same DNS domain name, or if your organization merges with, acquires, or is acquired by other company that uses the same DNS names then the two infrastructures can never interact with one another." - Original Message - From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:19 AM Subject: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > They won't authenicate through the real domain name servers. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > What prevents them from doing that with any real domain name? > > - Original Message - > From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:10 AM > Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > > It looks good on paper to avoid someone stealing your email domain and > > spoofing your address. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:03 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > > > > I don't see the point of a .loc domain myself. > > I think MS was recommending that in the early days, but generally, most > > recommendations now are to use a real domain name for your internal > network. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:58 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > > It is not the email address that I want change. Our current addressing is > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > > What I am looking to change is the SMTP header that Exchange is writing. > It > > is now writing this based upon the internal DNS information on the > Exchange > > Server. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:34 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > > > > Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only .loc? > > One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to .com on > > outgoing mail. > > > > Sander > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 09 June 2003 02:13 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > > I recently reconfigured our internal network from .com to .loc in advance > of > > our planned migration/upgrade to AD. We are running Ex 5.5 Sp4 on W2K Sp3. > I > > have found and issue with the SMTP header that now sent out as seen > > here: > > "Received: from challenger.creatcomp.loc (unknown[216.237.98.130]". I have > > reviewed both Robichaux's and McBee's books on Exch 5.5 looking for a way > to > > change this so it appears to come from an external FQDN but was unable to > > find any reference for this. I have also looked at just about every > > attribute within the Ex5.5 objects especially the IMS but nothing seems to > > be applicable. > > > > Is there any way to change this? > > > > Thanks > > -Dave Vantine > > > > _
RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
They won't authenicate through the real domain name servers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 What prevents them from doing that with any real domain name? - Original Message - From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:10 AM Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > It looks good on paper to avoid someone stealing your email domain and > spoofing your address. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > I don't see the point of a .loc domain myself. > I think MS was recommending that in the early days, but generally, most > recommendations now are to use a real domain name for your internal network. > > > -Original Message- > From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > It is not the email address that I want change. Our current addressing is > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > What I am looking to change is the SMTP header that Exchange is writing. It > is now writing this based upon the internal DNS information on the Exchange > Server. > > -Original Message- > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only .loc? > One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to .com on > outgoing mail. > > Sander > > -Original Message- > From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 June 2003 02:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > I recently reconfigured our internal network from .com to .loc in advance of > our planned migration/upgrade to AD. We are running Ex 5.5 Sp4 on W2K Sp3. I > have found and issue with the SMTP header that now sent out as seen > here: > "Received: from challenger.creatcomp.loc (unknown[216.237.98.130]". I have > reviewed both Robichaux's and McBee's books on Exch 5.5 looking for a way to > change this so it appears to come from an external FQDN but was unable to > find any reference for this. I have also looked at just about every > attribute within the Ex5.5 objects especially the IMS but nothing seems to > be applicable. > > Is there any way to change this? > > Thanks > -Dave Vantine > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- -- > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential > information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it > is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, > please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone > (212)935-4990, > fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. > Thank > you. > > > == > > > _
RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
It looks good on paper to avoid someone stealing your email domain and spoofing your address. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 I don't see the point of a .loc domain myself. I think MS was recommending that in the early days, but generally, most recommendations now are to use a real domain name for your internal network. -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 It is not the email address that I want change. Our current addressing is <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. What I am looking to change is the SMTP header that Exchange is writing. It is now writing this based upon the internal DNS information on the Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only .loc? One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to .com on outgoing mail. Sander -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 02:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change FQDN in Ex55 I recently reconfigured our internal network from .com to .loc in advance of our planned migration/upgrade to AD. We are running Ex 5.5 Sp4 on W2K Sp3. I have found and issue with the SMTP header that now sent out as seen here: "Received: from challenger.creatcomp.loc (unknown[216.237.98.130]". I have reviewed both Robichaux's and McBee's books on Exch 5.5 looking for a way to change this so it appears to come from an external FQDN but was unable to find any reference for this. I have also looked at just about every attribute within the Ex5.5 objects especially the IMS but nothing seems to be applicable. Is there any way to change this? Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook 2000
If I delete it will it regenerate?? - Original Message - From: "Pat Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Corrupted form cache? Look for and delete frmcache.dat on the client. Then try again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:03 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: Outlook 2000 I a workstation that has read receipt turned on. Each time they go to open or delete the receipt it gives them a dialog box that says: The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead. They click ok and then receipt either opens or deletes depending on what action they were requesting. This is just a Vanilla setup of Office 2000 with Outlook using the Corporate/Workgroup setup. No bells and whistles. What could be wrong? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2000
I a workstation that has read receipt turned on. Each time they go to open or delete the receipt it gives them a dialog box that says: The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead. They click ok and then receipt either opens or deletes depending on what action they were requesting. This is just a Vanilla setup of Office 2000 with Outlook using the Corporate/Workgroup setup. No bells and whistles. What could be wrong? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Icy grip on the US
-9 this morning at 5:30 am when I came in. Indianapolis, IN. Don't know what the wind chill was, didn't care. - Original Message - From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:11 AM Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > @ 7:00 am it was 45 degrees, didn't even bother warming the car up. > > -Original Message- > From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 8:04 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > Fricken COLD you little High School Boy!! :P > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 3:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Icy grip on the US > > > What is that in real temperature ? > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with > Exchange 2003 ** > -- > Martin Tuip > MVP Exchange > Exchange 2000 List owner > www.exchange-mail.org > www.sharepointserver.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > - Original Message - > From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 6:42 PM > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > 12 degrees in NC last night... 9 the night before... > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:18 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: OT: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > Whats this crap about a icy grip in the US that I see in the news? > > > > Its 50 degrees outside, I think this is the first January in Utah > > history that is hasn't snowed. I was at the park in shorts. > > > > e- > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why is this coming up???
This stupid domain name (IM_DOM1) is going to kill me when I go to Active Directory and E2K, isn't it. This is the domain I took over the Net Admin job with. I told myself and the Mgr of the dept that it wasn't/isn't a FQDN but there hasn't been a need until W2K Active directory to even think about FQDN's in this domain. So before I go Active Directory I need to change my domain name to something that meets industry standards. I know this is OT but is there an RFC I can print and give to the VP's and Mgr's to back up my claim or am I making an assumption on my part? Thank you again for looking into this issue. - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 1:27 AM Subject: RE: Why is this coming up??? > I missed it the first time but a little fairy pointed out to me that the > From: address appears to be malformed. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Why is this coming up??? > > > A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. > > 553 Could not parse sender address > > The message that caused this notification was: > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why is this coming up???
Thanks everyone. I will look into all three areas. I send to three different web enabled phones and of the three this is the only one that complains this way. The other two messaging.nextel.com and mobile.att.net receive their messages just fine. I just wanted to make sure my exchange was setup correctly. Thanks again. - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 10:55 AM Subject: RE: Why is this coming up??? > Ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Why is this coming up??? > > > A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. > > 553 Could not parse sender address > > The message that caused this notification was: > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is this coming up???
A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 553 Could not parse sender address The message that caused this notification was: To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook Rules
Outlook 2000. Yes it can be. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:02 AM Subject: RE: Outlook Rules > Is the client running? > > -Original Message- > From: David McSpadden [mailto:davidm@;imcu.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook Rules > > > I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a. > My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1. > I am trying to set up a rule that will forward an email sent to me. I can > manually forward the incoming email from X. to Y. But when I set up the > rule it does nothing. The X is in my Recepients the Y is in my personal > contacts. When I am manually forwarding it I select it from my contacts. > When I am setting up my rule I select it from my contacts. I don't see any > obvious errors but it still doesn't work. Can anyone explain to me why the > rule wouldn't work if manually forwarding does??? > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Rules
I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a. My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1. I am trying to set up a rule that will forward an email sent to me. I can manually forward the incoming email from X. to Y. But when I set up the rule it does nothing. The X is in my Recepients the Y is in my personal contacts. When I am manually forwarding it I select it from my contacts. When I am setting up my rule I select it from my contacts. I don't see any obvious errors but it still doesn't work. Can anyone explain to me why the rule wouldn't work if manually forwarding does??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
I have it but I have never had a change to install it on her PC. Again, my crying fit. - Original Message - From: "Mellott, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:08 PM Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > VNC? > > -Original Message- > From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > > > Server A is gone. > Trying to walk her through creating a new profile is what my crying fit was > about. > Thanks for bringing me back to your point. > > - Original Message - > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:28 PM > Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > > > > That's wonderful. > > What about my questions? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:26 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > > > > > > She's offsite and a true user. She has troubles logging in. I might have > > to have her bring in the PC. I just hate to do that because she lives 2 > > hours away. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:11 PM > > Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > > > > > > > Is Server A still up? > > > Why not just recreate the Outlook profile? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:07 PM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > > > > > > > > > I have a user that works from home. I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 > NT4.0sp6a > > > server and the user has a Windows 98 Outlook 2000 client. I have talked > > > with her and she can authenicate to the exchange server because she is > > > resolving her name in the profile using the Check Name button. But when > > she > > > tries to open the Client it gives her errors saying she can not connect > to > > > the server. She can ping both the IP and hostname. I am confused. > This > > > happened after I moved from Server A to Server B. This is my only > dialup > > > client and my only casuality out of 325 mailboxes. I am confused. Can > > > anyone help?? > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--> > > > Tied to your PC? Cut Loose and > > > Stay connected with Yahoo! Mobile > > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/QBCcSD/o1CEAA/sXBHAA/eJp0lB/TM > > > -~-> > > > > > > Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Exchange 2000 FAQ: > > > http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > == > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >
Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
Server A is gone. Trying to walk her through creating a new profile is what my crying fit was about. Thanks for bringing me back to your point. - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:28 PM Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > That's wonderful. > What about my questions? > > > -Original Message- > From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > > > She's offsite and a true user. She has troubles logging in. I might have > to have her bring in the PC. I just hate to do that because she lives 2 > hours away. > > - Original Message - > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:11 PM > Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > > > > Is Server A still up? > > Why not just recreate the Outlook profile? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:07 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > > > > > > I have a user that works from home. I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT4.0sp6a > > server and the user has a Windows 98 Outlook 2000 client. I have talked > > with her and she can authenicate to the exchange server because she is > > resolving her name in the profile using the Check Name button. But when > she > > tries to open the Client it gives her errors saying she can not connect to > > the server. She can ping both the IP and hostname. I am confused. This > > happened after I moved from Server A to Server B. This is my only dialup > > client and my only casuality out of 325 mailboxes. I am confused. Can > > anyone help?? > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--> > > Tied to your PC? Cut Loose and > > Stay connected with Yahoo! Mobile > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/QBCcSD/o1CEAA/sXBHAA/eJp0lB/TM > > -~-> > > > > Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange 2000 FAQ: > > http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > -- > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > == > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please imme
Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
She's offsite and a true user. She has troubles logging in. I might have to have her bring in the PC. I just hate to do that because she lives 2 hours away. - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:11 PM Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > Is Server A still up? > Why not just recreate the Outlook profile? > > > -Original Message- > From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:07 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access > > > I have a user that works from home. I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT4.0sp6a > server and the user has a Windows 98 Outlook 2000 client. I have talked > with her and she can authenicate to the exchange server because she is > resolving her name in the profile using the Check Name button. But when she > tries to open the Client it gives her errors saying she can not connect to > the server. She can ping both the IP and hostname. I am confused. This > happened after I moved from Server A to Server B. This is my only dialup > client and my only casuality out of 325 mailboxes. I am confused. Can > anyone help?? > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--> > Tied to your PC? Cut Loose and > Stay connected with Yahoo! Mobile > http://us.click.yahoo.com/QBCcSD/o1CEAA/sXBHAA/eJp0lB/TM > -~-> > > Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange 2000 FAQ: > http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VNC support (was: scheduling automatic rebooting of server)
The VNC was featured in the Windows & .NET Magazine.
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:06 AM
Subject: VNC support (was: scheduling automatic rebooting of server)
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, at 4:38pm, Ken Cornetet wrote:
> > I tried to talk my boss into letting me switch to VNC, but "freeware"
> > still scares management around here ("But who will you call for
> > support?").
>
> http://www.tridia.com
>
> --
> Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
not |
> | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or
|
> | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Managing Meeting Rooms
www.slipstick.com - Original Message - From: "Rif Kiamil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:48 PM Subject: Managing Meeting Rooms > Dear Ex Group, > I want to have a public folder calendar on Exchange and let user request > to book a appointment and at the same time to be able to see how busy it > is using the Scheduling Tab under Appointment, but the public Calendar > does not show it Busy/Free information. Is there a better or other way of > doing this? > > Rif Kiamil > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT Microsofts Knowledge Base
Try www.slipstick.com they have a pretty good setup. - Original Message - From: "Kim Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:22 AM Subject: RE: OT Microsofts Knowledge Base > the MS KB is now USELESS. I am, at present, seeking a channel to report this, but they really don't seem to care. The premier website is even worse - I can't even get in because the friggin' "passport" thing is broken. > > Since they made the www.exinternals.com website go away, there are now NO online support sites for Exchange, other than the ones maintained by volunteers. > > For those of us trying to do our jobs, they're making it really tough. > > > -Original Message- > From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 2:21 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OT Microsofts Knowledge Base > > > Whats up with Microsoft's Knowledge Base? For the last couple of days I > have been receiving a lot of errors. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Has anyone seen this virus
sircam virus - Original Message - From: "Callan, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Has anyone seen this virus > the attachment is att02125.att > the text is as follows: > Hi! How are you? > I send you this file in order to have your advice > See you later, Thanks. > > Has anyone seen this, and if so should I be worried about it? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
