RE: Default folders in Exchange
Can you log in and move them back through OWA? JDE -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Default folders in Exchange You mean it appears like this: -Deleted Items | -Drafts | -Inbox ? (apologies for the crap drawing) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 June 2002 11:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Default folders in Exchange User Group Exchange 2000 SP2 Outlook 2000 SR1 I have a user who has their drafts folder below the deleted items folder and their inbox below the drafts folder. Can any one tell me how I can get these folders back at the root level of the users mailbox. This is not the first time that this has happened and am wondering what would cause this problem. I can't see this as a user error. Deleted Items\Drafts\Inbox Actions: 1. Look on TechNet 2. Use Exchange 5.0 Client to try and move the folders back 3. Run Outlook.exe with /ResetFolders 4. Moving the users mailbox in the past did not cure the problem I know as a last resort I can export the users mailbox out into a pst and recreate the mailbox. Constructive comments would be very much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: License Issue
The only person who can correctly advise on licenses is... in the FAQ. JDE -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:License Issue Dear List, I have few points to discuss, 1. Can I install Exchnage 2000 Enterprise on Windows 2000 (Not Advance Server) 2. can I put one Windows to 2000 Advance server with Exchange 2000 Enterprise and put 2 site server as Windows 2000 and Exchange 2000. 3. Can I restore Windows Advance server 2000 System State backup on Windows 2000 server, if yes then, 4. Can I restore Exchange 2000 on the server. If am missing something please add or feel free to ask. Thanks and Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: License Issue
Just as well you're already to p155 on me really mate. Long day... JDE -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: License Issue You're on fire today. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 June 2002 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: License Issue Or not, it seems after reflection Ask your product supplier. JDE -Original Message- From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: License Issue The only person who can correctly advise on licenses is... in the FAQ. JDE -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:License Issue Dear List, I have few points to discuss, 1. Can I install Exchnage 2000 Enterprise on Windows 2000 (Not Advance Server) 2. can I put one Windows to 2000 Advance server with Exchange 2000 Enterprise and put 2 site server as Windows 2000 and Exchange 2000. 3. Can I restore Windows Advance server 2000 System State backup on Windows 2000 server, if yes then, 4. Can I restore Exchange 2000 on the server. If am missing something please add or feel free to ask. Thanks and Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE
Yahoo did the same recently. Must be a conspiracy. I blame Elvis [1]. But junk mail relating to mail clients on Exchange? I think you can relax. JDE [1] he denies it. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE Also related: If you signed up for Hotmail - or anything else that uses Passport more than a couple of months ago, you may be in for a big surprise. It seems that Microsoft changed the rules while you weren't looking. Unilaterally, Microsoft may have granted itself permission to pass along your personal information to other companies that use Passport on their Web sites. The personal information includes your email address, your birthday, your country and zip code, your gender and occupation. Has Microsoft taken liberties with your data? There's an easy way to check. Go into Hotmail and log into your account. Click Options (to the right of the tab that says Address Book). Click Personal Profile (in the upper left corner). Scroll down to the bottom of the screen and see whether the boxes marked Share my e-mail address and Share my other registration information have been checked. UNCHECK THESE!! Those boxes didn't exist when most people currently signed up for Hotmail, and chances are pretty good they didn't exist when you signed up for it, either. I certainly never gave Microsoft permission to hand out my email address - or my birthday, gender or occupation. Yet both of those boxes on my personal profile were checked. I bet they're checked on your personal profile, too. Worth checking! Regards E. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE Cool. What's the phone number or contact information at Hotmail for me to contact and get my share of cheap Hotmail e-mail addresses? -Original Message- From: Richard Serafin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE Yup, I've bought some myself just because I didn't believe it, I had to try it, 5000 Hotmail address like $29.95 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE Hotmail sells your address to them. Really. Yes, that must be it. --- Clearswift monitors, controls and protects all its messaging traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy using Clearswift products. Find out more about Clearswift, its solutions and services at http://www.clearswift.com This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of Clearswift. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Clearswift by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents. Clearswift accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the Clearswift domain. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catch all email sent to my company address
It had better spelling and grammar though. Be fair... :) JDE -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Catch all email sent to my company address It is terse and incomplete, yes. Unfortunately, it's also inaccurate. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Catch all email sent to my company address I was trying to be as descriptive as the original poster was in asking his question. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Catch all email sent to my company address Go find it and report back. Until then, we are all to assume that it isn't there. And don't tell me about the one in Exchange 2000 because it doesn't work. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Catch all email sent to my company address There is an option on where to send all incoming email inside the exchange console. You tell it whom to forward all mail to. Can't seem to think of the exact screen right now. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Catch all email sent to my company address How can I forward all email sent to non-existent mailboxes in my domain e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] , to a particular mailbox. So all email sent to non-existent personnel in the mycompany.com domain should be sent to this mailbox _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BLB's
Don't go holding your breath now boy. :) JDE -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: BLB's You all hit the nail on the head there, guys. Thanks for the VERY useful links. Now the fun part... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BLB's http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BLB's Anyone got any good Q articles or pages explaining the drawbacks of doing Brick Level Backups? My memory is slightly rusty and i am looking to persuade my new site to stop doing them. The site is currently using Veritas Exchange backup. Searched TechNet with no fruitful findings. DR papers dont have much about it. Many thanks Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding exchange
Ah, leave the poor guy alone. This is a radical idea that's never been tried before, otherwise he could do his own reading and research. Right? JDE -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: adding exchange And you will have to come out from under the troll bridge to do this as it has no network. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding exchange You need the following: Spot welding kit. Lots of tape. 2 copies of ArcServe 2000. MS-Bob service pack 1. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding exchange Does anyone know how to add an additional exchange server too a existing exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Legal Question.......
No. Check with your HR, ask them to check with the companies legal advice. Don't get involved in the decision. JDE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Legal Question... All, I have pretty much been lurking on this list for awhile now. I really respect the Technical opinions that most have offered, Not to mention, the biting sarcasm keeps me in fits of laughter. That Said, I have a client that has asked me a question that I don't Have the legal expertise to answer, and was curious if 1. Any of you have dealt with a similar experience and 2. Could point me to a specific, reference in writing. I was recently approached by my client to get access to one of their employees email. I told them to hold off, I would have to check if I was legally able to do that for them. The equipment is owned by my client. There is Policy in the employee handbook states that Email is for business use only. My client has reason to believe an employee is sending corporate information, (vendor lists and pricing) Offsite to someone outside their company. My client and I both reside in the U.S., in the state of Maryland. Does anyone know what the legal ramifications of viewing/reviewing an employees email are? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
Yeah, and I thought it was 5, 7, 5. Can't be bothered to count those. JDE -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) Geez, that didn't even rhyme. -Original Message- From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) You've got to be kidding... The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list. This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and scornful nerds.. - Previously from Thomas Nardo: If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had highwaters? --- .+--xm ,)潌r(康-\檆b!ຶ 0 觑zǚ쮱r슬:.˛ m隊[hy㠠\z[,㈠)rቄZ Zvh娧+-i٢2�G( -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
You should see him in his nice powder blue top. Very fetching. JDE -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question For someone who has a feminine first *and* last name, I would be careful... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Someone explain to her about the birds and the bees. :) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 13:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question And why couldn't the male carry the egg? I'm calling HR. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Is it a male or a female bird? That way you should keep in mind that the female bird could carry an egg. Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 Listowner www.exchange-mail.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question It's a contained environment with no crosswinds. No more honey for you if you stomp on my parade!! Now, back to the show. -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Pretty much as I understand the latest theory of bee flight but put much better than I could have done. But it does prove that the formula presented by Jennifer may not hold true for everything that flies. However, is a deflated bird flying or just a projectile being shot from some device? Coming back to bees it is with great sadness to know that at least the humble bumble bee in Britain is reducing in numbers, no more honey for us! Paul -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 13:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Obviously bumble bees do fly but no fixed wing study in a conventional wind tunnel has shown how enough lift can be generated to lift the huge mass of a bumble bee (compared to its wing size). A wide range of studies have been done in recent years to try to understand the bee's unique method of flying. Insects like the bee do not flap their wings up and down as one might think. The movement of their wings is forward and backward. Lay your right hand on the table (palm down) and move it to the left. That is what the bee does as the first part of its wing beat. This movement produces lift because your hand produces the same effect as an airplane wing. Air moving over the top produces a low pressure because of the greater curvature, a principal known as Bernoulli's principal. Now flip your hand over (palm up) and return it to its original position. Computer studies shown that the timing of the flip is critical. The wake of the forward stroke allows the wing to recapture energy as the wing is moved back. There is a surge of forces on the wing as this happens which provides great lift at minimal energy. Dr. Adrian Thomas of Oxford University says, The whole system is a lot more complicated than we thought. A lot remains to be done to understand this, but the maneuverability and efficiency of it indicates man needs to understand to improve his own methods of flying. To suggest that such systems come about by chance strains credibility to the limit. The enormous complexity of the motion, the design of the wings to do the flying, and the support system that moves the wing all speaks of highly planned and designed structures that we still do not totally understand. Does that answer your question? Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 Listowner www.exchange-mail.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question I am impressed with all this theory but to digress slightly, can you explain how a bee flies? Paul -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 12:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question You forgot the cross wind factor. Martin Tuip MVP
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Check the FAQ. JDE -Original Message- From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OT - Luke save the Queen whats star wars? Regards James Johnston BT Ignite Solutions, eCRM Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDI : 01392 459076 Cell: 07771 738456 Fax : 01392 431025 Web : http://www.Ignite.Com/ British Telecommunications plc Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ Registered in England no. 180. This electronic message contains information from British Telecommunications plc which may be privileged and confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail (to the number or address above) immediately. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus / Worm ??
I also received one from you, or the address. Open relay time? JDE -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: New Virus / Worm ?? AFAIK, this infected message didn't come from me. It has my return address, but as you can see, the sending server is mail.stadacona.ca. We block all executables at the server, and I started getting bounce messages about an hour before I was even in the office. Also, nobody I've every actually email directly has bounced me a message, and I'm not seeing any outbound port 25 traffic from any machine other than my mail server. Can anyone confirm that this virus forges return addresses? The antiviral vendors appear to be behind on this one... -ryan- -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus / Worm ?? I received an E-mail from a person that I didn't know this morning, and the subject line was a lot of nonsense characters. Using Outlook 2000 I highlighted it and it kicked off the attachment, which opened Media Player and tried to play a file, but got a content error. Here is the header from the message as it was received. Anyone have any ideas about this? === Received: from COURRIER (mail.stadacona.ca [207.236.164.198]) by mx2.geac.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id T1K1YYZM; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:56:21 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Subject: Xodco0411odco0804odco040alogv040abedsnotebeclassodco0804bedsnotebootodco0407 logv0409exgu040aodco0412avco040cbootmoderatravco0411unstdllodco040clogv0404o dco040cbebsdulogv0412odco0407 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type=multipart/alternative; boundary=_ABC1234567890DEF_ X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Unsent: 1 --_ABC1234567890DEF_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_ABC0987654321DEF_ --_ABC0987654321DEF_ Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --_ABC0987654321DEF_-- --_ABC1234567890DEF_ Content-Type: audio/x-wav; name=readme.exe Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: EA4DMGBP9p John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 ...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there are none so blind as those who will not see --The Moody Blues (I know you're out there) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT -- Nostradamus' prediction on WW3:
Oh my [diety of choice]! I take size 9 shoes! My shoes are omnipotent! C'mon folks... JDE -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:FW: OT -- Nostradamus' prediction on WW3: Since you have both Lincoln and Kennedy, that makes two. Add 2 to 7 and you get 9. Match that with the previous post and up get Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT -- Nostradamus' prediction on WW3: And Lincoln has 2 l's that, if you put side by side, almost looks like... ...11 gasp ...Joel -- Rate this email: 1. It was useful 2. Not necessary but informative 3. Snort cheese bloody moron 4. Thanks, now I'm sending you a virus 5. All your base AAAH -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT -- Nostradamus' prediction on WW3: And Kennedy and Lincoln both have seven letters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Hankins Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT -- Nostradamus' prediction on WW3: I'm sure many of you have seen this already, but I thought it was a little interesting. Nostradamus' prediction on WW3: In the year of the new century and nine months, From the sky will come a great King of Terror... The sky will burn at forty-five degrees. Fire approaches the great new city... In the city of York there will be a great collapse, 2 twin brothers torn apart by chaos while the fortress falls the great leader will succumb third big war will begin when the big city is burning - NOSTRADAMUS He said this will be bigger than the previous two. 2001 is the first year of the new century and this is the 9th month. New York is located at the 41st degree Latitude. Bill Hankins Senior Network Engineer iCorps Technologies _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]
What does the rule say? -Original Message- From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] When you recieve an SMTP message with your address specified in the cc field the inbox forwarding rule does not work. I have checked this out on the MS Technet/web site and found one reference in Q195583. This states the problem was fixed in Service Pack 2 , however I am on Exchange 5.5 spk 4 and the problem still exists. I have checked the file versions as stated in the Q Article and can confirm that all files mentioned are later than those listed. Has anybody else come across this problem and if so how did you fix it? Martin North Ricardo Consulting Engineers Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]
I admire your patience, you've outlasted me by 4 vague and unhelpful posts JDE -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] Ok. Details are a nice thing. Now, what is the exact combination you are using at this very second?[1] Don't generalize when you can be specific. [1] I actually know the answer to your question, and have known it since your first post... but this is now a fishing lesson. -Original Message- From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] The rule is done from exchange client ver 5 and is a check box -it does not use a rule wizard as in outlook. the rule is to forward all messages to the nominated user. Have tried various combinations of the cc box only and addressed to directly to me and none seem to work -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 16:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] No... What does the rule say. -Original Message- From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] The rule simply forwards the mail on to another external smtp address Regards Martin -Original Message- From: Ewins, James [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 15:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] What does the rule say? -Original Message- From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] When you recieve an SMTP message with your address specified in the cc field the inbox forwarding rule does not work. I have checked this out on the MS Technet/web site and found one reference in Q195583. This states the problem was fixed in Service Pack 2 , however I am on Exchange 5.5 spk 4 and the problem still exists. I have checked the file versions as stated in the Q Article and can confirm that all files mentioned are later than those listed. Has anybody else come across this problem and if so how did you fix it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583]
Do you have a rule set to send the same answer? E X A C T L Y what does it say? Example: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to random list move it to the random list folder Now you try -Original Message- From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] The rule is currently set that all messages received should be forwarded to the new address -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 16:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] Hmmm, your version of Outlook must be different than mine. I don't have anything which says simple check box to forward to an external smtp address. What /exactly/ does the rule say? -Original Message- From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] thr rule is the simple check box to forward mail to an external smtp address Martin -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] Only when it's related to user error in the design of the rule. -Original Message- From: North Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules are not applied to cc messages [q195583] When you recieve an SMTP message with your address specified in the cc field the inbox forwarding rule does not work. I have checked this out on the MS Technet/web site and found one reference in Q195583. This states the problem was fixed in Service Pack 2 , however I am on Exchange 5.5 spk 4 and the problem still exists. I have checked the file versions as stated in the Q Article and can confirm that all files mentioned are later than those listed. Has anybody else come across this problem and if so how did you fix it? Martin North Ricardo Consulting Engineers Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
A lot of smoke on the TV from near it - no sure what or how close. JDE -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Urgent! Is it also confirmed that the Pentagon has been hit with something as well? Rob -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! I saw the second one flying into the building live on TV. Apperantly a hijacked 767 passenger jet from Boston. Most of the newssites are hammered with traffic now; www.ananova.com www.msnbc.com www.cnn.com Martin - Original Message - From: Woodrick, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: Urgent! Folks, If you haven't heard, two aircraft have crashed into the World Trade Center towers. This is not a joke. Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can someone let me know...
At risk of starting a flood of traffic to one of the still-functioning news sites, wired.com is still kinda working. Not heard about Martial law but the BBC are refusing to report rumors, probably quite rightly. Do what you feel is right. JDE -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Can someone let me know... Hey, I'm stuck here without radio or TV. The entire net (news wise anyway) is dead. What the heck is going on? I hear all kinds of rumors about martial law, the government telling people to go home and stay home... Should I stay at work, do I need to stay off the roads, what the hell is going on. -- Craig Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS Manager Stanek Tool Corp. http://www.stanektool.com New Berlin, WI _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Over limits message
Poor service maybe, but not a scam. And even if they did fix this for us, we'd find something else to complain about... JDE -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Over limits message But it is not a scam. -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Over limits message I knew my response would get some responses. Haven't had my caffeine. Well, since I don't drink anything with it, it's a moot point. Anyway, my point was that Erik said that requests are added in the next version. But MS has regularly added features with service packs (journaling, IMS domain blocking instead of just by IP, Mailbox manager, etc.), but not the ability to modify the storage limits message. So my response was simply that not all requests are honored, since the ability to modify the message via registry entries or GUI were certainly possible if they chose to do so. There certainly have been a lot of requests over the years for that functionality, and to offer it only through a sink in 2000 seems kind of a let down. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: can read other users mail!!!
Mailbox or PST? JDE -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:can read other users mail!!! Hello all, I have a Microsoft Exchange server 5.5 sp4, latest fixes running on Windows2000 sp1 server. I have built it in the same way as all my other servers in the same site though they are all on Windows NT, not 2000. Problem is that if I go to a pc where there is a profile for a user and logon as someone else, i.e. not that user, we can read that users mail. It doesn't matter who logs on, we can all read the person's mail! It is not an isolated case, it happens with all mail accounts on this server, but not on any other servers. What am I missing? THe mailboxes look just the same as all those in the rest of the site. Is there some security thing about 2000 that I am unaware of? If I try and do an open other users folder, that does not work, it seems only to be when you are on a machine that has a profile for mailboxes on this particular server. Help, this is not good, many thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Hide the modem / wire. JDE -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
