RE: Serbian premier assassinated
Is this still the exchange list? -Original Message- From: Aamir Hanif [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 6:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Serbian premier assassinated the only difference being that this time north america wants to attack everyone and europe does not. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Serbian premier assassinated This is how the first world war started... From BBC newswire Serbian premier assassinated The Serbian Prime Minister, Zoran Djindjic, has been assassinated in the capital, Belgrade. He was shot in front of government offices at around 1300 (1200 gmt) on Wednesday. He was taken to hospital for emergency surgery but a government minister told the BBC's Serbian section that he had died of his wounds. Mr Djindjic, a former mayor of the Serbian capital, was a prominent reformist opposition leader until Slobodan Milosevic was ousted from power in 2000. Unconfirmed Serbian media reports say that two people were arrested at the scene of the shooting. A police source told Reuters news agency that he had been hit twice by large-calibre sniper rifle bullets. The editor of the Fonet news agency, Zoran Sekulich, told BBC World television Mr Djindjic had been shot once in the stomach and once in the back. Enemies On 21 February Mr Djindjic survived what he said was an assassination bid when a lorry swung into the path of his motorcade as he was travelling to Belgrade airport. He later dismissed the incident as a futile effort which could not stop democratic reforms. Correspondents say that Mr Djindjic, 50, made many enemies over his career as a pro-democracy campaigner and then as Serbia's prime minister. He was pivotal in arresting and handing Mr Milosevic over to the war crimes tribunal in The Hague in June 2001. The move opened the way to international aid to the then Yugoslavia. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reroute Incoming Mail
Under servers, servername, smtp, default smtp virtual server, properties -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reroute Incoming Mail All, As in Exchange 5.5. On the IMS connector properties you had a Routing tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email. Can someone point me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K? I'm driving myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this. Thanks for you help! __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Question
I have tried this in the past and I always have gotten the error unable to clean free/busy off the server Do you know why that might be happening. Outlook 2002\Ex2k. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question Set to 0 months and then run Outlook with the /cleanfreebusy switch to axe the old message. No F/B info, that way. Sweet. I hate F/B messages. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WAISEL, HAROLD B Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question I was only concerned with the info up on the server. And you are correct in that I do want it to wipe out everything on the server. Since, by default, two months of info is posted, I was wondering if he'd have to deal with it for the next 60 days. Thanks, Harold -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question If he stops publishing his free/busy info, it's not going to wipe out his Calendar, if that's what your worried about. With that in mind, who cares if it wipes out all of his free/busy information past/present/future? Sounds like that's what he wants anyway. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Question Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Question
Sept 99 to be exact. I just ran it and received the following error. The contents of this public folder are currently unavailable. Either the Microsoft Exchange Server computer servicing this public folder is down or the public folder has not been replicated to this site So I am looking into that right now. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free/Busy Question GWClient is on the Back Office Resource kit. But I don't have that. Can you get it somewhere else? - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:13 PM Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question There's an app to go in and delete the F/B message the dirty way... GWClient. Use that. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question I have tried this in the past and I always have gotten the error unable to clean free/busy off the server Do you know why that might be happening. Outlook 2002\Ex2k. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question Set to 0 months and then run Outlook with the /cleanfreebusy switch to axe the old message. No F/B info, that way. Sweet. I hate F/B messages. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WAISEL, HAROLD B Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question I was only concerned with the info up on the server. And you are correct in that I do want it to wipe out everything on the server. Since, by default, two months of info is posted, I was wondering if he'd have to deal with it for the next 60 days. Thanks, Harold -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question If he stops publishing his free/busy info, it's not going to wipe out his Calendar, if that's what your worried about. With that in mind, who cares if it wipes out all of his free/busy information past/present/future? Sounds like that's what he wants anyway. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Question Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: Scanmail price increase
I switched to Antigen after 3 years with ScanMail. Antigen is great and they will even talk to you on the phone, weird! I have been using it for 4-5 months and we like it very much and the price was a lot lower. -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scanmail price increase Anyone else getting notified of a huge increase in maintanence cost for Trend's Scanmail? Our cost is going from $4,000 to more than $7,000. If anyone is looking to buy new licenses you better do it before Oct. 1 when the new pricing goes into effect. Looks like it's time to start looking at other vendors. Jeff Petschow College of DuPage _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event: 2081
I was just reading this in the reskit so I thought I would post it, Event ID 1018, 1019, and 1022: Database is Damaged When performing backup and restore, you receive an Event ID 1018, 1019, or 1022: Database is damaged error message. This means that online backup cannot complete because the database is damaged. Solution Check the hardware for errors and complete a restore of this database as soon as possible. You can perform an offline backup so you have a recent copy of the database on tape even though it is damaged. Caution You should never delete logs from the system when performing an offline backup. The logs are required if you want to restore from the online backups. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event: 2081 Anyone has any idea why this event is popping up every minutes? Thanks in advance. snip Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeDSAccess Event Category: Topology Event ID: 2081 Date: 6/24/2002 Time: 12:11:13 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Process WINMGMT.EXE (PID=920). DSAccess will use the servers from the following list: Domain Controllers: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu Global Catalogs: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu The Configuration Domain Controller is set to dc2.ats.ucla.edu. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving the IMCDATA folder
I am trying to move the IMCDATA folder because it has gotten very big and I am running out of space on that drive. When I try to move it with the Exchange Optimizer is just hangs and the Job never completes. I am running NT4 Sp6a 5.5 Sp4, any suggestions. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving the IMCDATA folder
Thanks Ed. I wanted to move until I figured out the why it is so large. It is the exactly what you outlined. I will try that thank you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving the IMCDATA folder If it's too big because of content in the \IMCDATA\IN\ARCHIVE and \OUT\ARCHIVE folders, then in Diagnostics Logging turn off Message Archival, stop and start the service, then delete the messages in those folders. If it's too big because of content in the \IN and \OUT folders, then figure out what's wrong because there should be only transient information therein. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving the IMCDATA folder I am trying to move the IMCDATA folder because it has gotten very big and I am running out of space on that drive. When I try to move it with the Exchange Optimizer is just hangs and the Job never completes. I am running NT4 Sp6a 5.5 Sp4, any suggestions. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ex2k problem
We have added a New Ex2k server to and existing site that has one 5.5 server. We are able to receive mail between the two servers, internal mail. We are able to send mail Outbound from the new server but inbound mail is not being relayed from the 5.5 server. We see the mail hitting the inbound queue on the 5.5 server but it does not make it to the ex2k server. I have max logs running on the 5.5 server and we see the mail hitting that box but it is not being forwarded, it looks like it just deletes it. TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Of Course not. None of these guys had any of that kind of experience. It was not much more then an entry level position we were trying to fill. I am sorry if I offended anyone, that was certainly not my intention. At the top of my email I said the best cert is the one that helps you do your job better. If you can do your job just fine and you don't need ot crack a book - that is awesome. I guess I just thought I was kind of in the group of average intelligence (majority) or below and I need all the help from books, fourms and the such to get by. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I have yet to pick up an exchange or Cisco Book. Infact I was given my first exchange book just yesterday by a friend. Have not had the time to read them. Yet I have worked with installs as large 30,000 users in exchange, As a hired consultant. Yesterday I added a few new T1's to a few of the 100's of routers the company I work for, as a day job, owns. I am solely responsible for all of those routers as well the rest of the network and a 5,000 user install of Exchange. Books and paper mean very little... Would you hire a paper MCSE over me? Would you hire someone who could Quote the OSI model over me? Why memorize what I have one the wall and in Text files. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question They had very little experience, and I asked them what the last book they read and neither could name a book- would you hire them? But you are right, I could use some education, no denying that. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question So to you the lack of a MCSE means they werent interested in educating themselves? Sheesh. Sounds like you need some education yourself. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information
adding another domain in Exchange 5.5
Just wanted to make sure I was right in my thinking and the FAQ 3.23 appears to verify that. I need to add another email domain to the exchange box (5.5 sp4) The new domain lets say is called water.com. I have an MX record pointing to our exchange box. Our current (Primary) domain is rsd-tc.com. Under sent to water.com under route to rsd-tc.com The FAQ seems to be written with sub domains in mind but this is not hierarchical, this will still work just fine - right? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resizing Partition with Exchange 2000 Server
I have done this and it worked great - Volume manager is great stuff -Original Message- From: Justin Lape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resizing Partition with Exchange 2000 Server Hello Everybody, I was just getting ready to resize a partition on my Windows 2000 SBS Server with Exchange 2000 Server. Before I move forward I just wanted to check and see if anyone knew of any problems with resizing a partition that has Exchange 2000 installed on it. I am going to use Powerquest Volume Manager to do the resizing. Thanks, Justin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CRC errors
are you also taking CRC errors on the serial int of your router out to the ISP? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: CRC errors I have been seeing CRC errors on my Exchange Server CPQNTAC utility for the last few days, multiplying at the rate of about 2500 errors over a period of 24 hours on an average. Considering that CRC errors could be hardware related I swapped the NIC but this did not resolve the issue, my next step is to schedule some downtime and check cables etc. It does seem to be within our network as our ISP has cleared their T1 lines. Any ideas or comments on this issue would be appreciated. MSExchange 5.5 sp4 on NT Server sp6. Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error message got 6
Nothing appears in the Exchange logs. I have smtp interface events turned on to max. Here is the Interlinx log, the got six error is at the bottom. 130:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE CP-13-#1: Entered initiator send state 131:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.InitSend() returns 1 132:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Processing MailboxItem #27; PostboxItem #50 133:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Checking SMTP Address of delivery queue SMTP 134:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Using recipients SMTP address since the queue doesn't have an SMTP address. 135:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Using SMTP address [EMAIL PROTECTED] of recipient TESTVEND 136:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Checking SMTP Address of sender TESTCUST 137:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Checking for Certificates for TESTCUST and TESTVEND 138:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Unable to Sign 139:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Unable to Encrypt and assumed unable to sign any MDN we request! 140:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer NOTICE A mailbox item was rejected on delivery. 141:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Message Data comprises 2259 bytes w/contentType= text/plain 142:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Creating Plain Message to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' from '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. 143:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Setting Message-ID=InterLinx.app-serv.1005859242875 144:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Saving message to TESTVEND from TESTCUST 145:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Message does NOT contain MDN Request 146:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE SMTPInitiator.doSend(): Message was NOT successfully transmitted. Reason : SMTPUnknownErrorException: Exception of unknown origin occurred 147:Thu 15 Nov 2001, 13:20:42 PST DeliveryServer TRACE CP-13-#1: doSend status...got 6 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error message got 6 Your exchange host is an open relay. Your sendmail host thinks that yahoo.com does not exist. What was the entire error? Also, did you turn up logging on the exchange server's msexchangeimc, for instance the smtp interface events? -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error message got 6 We have a program called Interlinx that uses smtp. It has an error in it's event log Got 6 and Interlinx support says that it is an exchange problem. I can telnet from the Interlinx box to port 25 on the exchange box and it works fine. Just wondering if anyone has heard of this error?? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Infect file slips thru Trend Antivirus
I noticed when I checked the option scan message body in MAPI mode it warned that performance could be affected. The warning is correct, there is a noticeable difference when that option is selected. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Infect file slips thru Trend Antivirus Well, thank you very much, Martin. I'll look into implementing your suggestions ASAP. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Infect file slips thru Trend Antivirus There you go. You cannot depend on MAPI scanning. ANY Exch aware AV will let files slip under load when doing MAPI only. You need to turn on the AVAPI or ESE based scanning (depending on your version). You also need to block more file types. Also, do both AVAPI and MAPI, also let it scan the message body. I will now provide you with the famous Martin Blackstone Blocked Files List. You will use this list going forward (This list should be in the FAQ) Basics vbs;shs;js;com;bat;cmd;pif;scr;chm;VB Full List VB;ASX;ADE;ADP;BAS;BAT;BIN;CHM;CMD;COM;CPL;CRT;DLL;EXE;HIV;HLP;HTA;INF;I NS;ISP;JS;JSE;JTD;MSC;MSI;MSP;MST;OCX;OFT;OVL;PCD;PIF;PL;PLX;SCR;SCT;SH; SHB;SHS;SYS;VBE;VBS;VSS;VST;VXD;WSC;WSF;WSH; -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Infect file slips thru Trend Antivirus MAPI, 5.5 sp4, exe vbs cmd bat Server load - you may be right. It's on a Pro 200 dual with 500 meg RAM and it handles around 150 mailboxes and public folders. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Infect file slips thru Trend Antivirus How are you doing the scan? MAPI, AVAPI, or ESE. This sounds like MAPI. When doing MAPI scans, the scanner can become overloaded and pass virii. Also, what version of Trend, what Exch SP, and what file types are you blocking -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Infect file slips thru Trend Antivirus Today, we had a virus outbreak with the homepage virus (released in the wild 5/9). We use TrendMicro's AV on our Exchange server (5.5) along with the desktop version. From the infected computer, I received 9 emails of the virus. With the first 4 emails, Trend caught and stripped the attachment. However, the subsequent 5 emails had the attachment with them. (And, btw, I also have it set up to block exe, vbs, bat and cmd files.) Even more, when two more computers got infected opening the attachment from the original pc, Trend didn't catch those subsequent emails at all. I understand, of course, Ed's rule of thumb about technological solutions but I'm mostly just curious (and concerned to a degree) why our AV didn't protect us that much. I've contacted Trend support and asked them why this happened but I'm simply throwing it out here for comment. I just find it rather perplexing that Trend only catches half of them. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disaster Recovery
We have a DR plan in place. We test recovery every six months. We fly out of state to a Sungard facility with only our backup tapes, our documentation (which we keep off site) and restore our system. For exchange, use the FAQ of course and the DR one and two whitepapers off technet. We restore everything including the Unix boxes, NT\2000, Terminal servers\Citrix, LAN and WAN. We have a separate PVC pointing to Phoenix location we use to restore the WAN. Everytime we do this we learn a ton more about being prepared. Exchange was the one and only thing that we had an issue with on the last trip and that was a backupexec thing, we now use NTbackup and have practice a few restores, piece of cake using NTBACKUP. We have had two exchange failures in the last three years, I won't talk about the first one but the second one was back up in less then three hours. Hope that helps, Gordon -Original Message- From: Amir El Aziq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster Recovery In light of the recent WTC tragedy, I was wondering if anyone on the list had lost exchange servers, or were forced into DR by the situation? How did you handle business continuity, and was there anything that you learnt that would change your strategy going forward? How long did it take you to get things back online? I'm guessing that there are admins out there that were in this situation that had to get mail going in order to keep the (global) enterprise functioning. Amir _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disaster Recovery Test 2
Just completed what you would like to do, you do not need to reinstall exchange. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster Recovery Test 2 Hello All, Note: Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP1 Recovery Server and Production Exchange server have identical Exchange server, Windows 2k server and service packs. I have just successfully completed a DR test using the last full backup tape (Friday's tape). My manager would like me to do another test but this time using a full backup tape from April 2001. He said that back in July they lost some public folder data and could not recover it and was wondering if I could do another DR test using an older tape. My question is this. Should I reinstall Exchange and do all the steps over again? Can I just restore the IS and DS from April and would it overwrite the current one? What is the best way to go about performing the next DR test? Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nimda
Cisco released a DOC last night with access-lists to keep the nimba out at the router and there was a little snip about smtp. You might want to check that out. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda While we are on the subject, does anyone know how nimda finds an SMTP host for it's attempts to propagate itself SMTP? I've read all the reports I can find, all mention it's internal SMTP engine, but none tell how he finds an SMTP host to connect to. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus / Worm ??
search the registry for root.exe, I didn't think I had it either but... -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? Trend finally came out with there pattern update. :( Luckly I didn't get it anywhere. -Original Message- From: Heather Bellson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? woops, i should say that i'm talking about NAI's sdat. -Original Message- From: Heather Bellson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? the sdat version 2 deleted a bunch of executables on the three nt boxes we ran virus scan on. we had it set to automatically clean. iexplore.exe hyperterminal, etc. not good. anyone else seeing this? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? Yes, NAI released an extra.dat Still waiting for trend to put out an update. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? Does anyone have any more info on this?? Does NAI have an update? I can't get through to them. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: John Bricher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? On the servers that were infected at our company, we found a mmc.exe that was running in c:\winnt. This appeared to be regenerating the readme.eml files. We killed the process, deleted the file, and deleted the .eml files. This appears to have worked for now. Not sure how to stop it from happening again. John Bricher Windows NT Engineer Cybear, Inc. 561-999-3549 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus / Worm ??
I searched the registry on the exchange box earlier and found the readme.eml and root.exe under HK_users, Doc Find Spec MRU. I cannot find the file anywhere on the machine and everything appears to be working fine. I did not have the ScanMail patch until about an hour or so ago. I am blocking exe's now but I wasn't earlier today. Should I just delete these values in the registry? TIA Gordon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? It exploits the very dangerous iFrame vulnerability detailed at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms01-020.asp. The one thing that article doesn't tell you is that the IE patch it describes does not block the ability of Office documents in an iFrame to launch automatically. What that means is that if you don't have Office macro security set high enough, the next attack could use a Word .doc macro to deliver its payload. I just received an e-mail with this virus/worm. It appears to be not very nice. I use the preview pane in Outlook and it automatically attempted to launch the attachment. For once, I'm glad I had the new security features in Outlook SR-1 that does not allow launching an .exe w/out saving it to the hard drive first. The virus had a subject with 255 characters in it. Methinks there was/is an exploit for subject lines that long. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fax server - What is the best solution?
Let me ask it a little differently. I am thinking about GFI because I have used the five user version. Has anyone had any negative experiences with it? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? To discuss Fish Taco's of course!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? What's the point of a discussion list then? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 4, 2001 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? It gets no less confusing when everyone chimes in with his or her preferences, either. I suggest you review the products based on your own need and cost parameters. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax server - What is the best solution? Missy, I actually looked at that, I even have my printed copy of the FAQ. I was just wondering what people were using here on the fourm. There is so mnay different ones that it gets sort of confusing. Gordon -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Fax server - What is the best solution? I'd suggest checking the handy-dandy FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm. It's so good I even memorized the URL. Missy - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Fax server - What is the best solution? I would like to get your opinion on what you feel is the best Fax Solution. We are Running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and no plans to move to Exchange 2000 until May 2002. We have a Terminal Server \ Citrix XP enviroment using Outlook 2000. We have 52 remote locations and would like a Fax solution that would use Outlook, what do you suggest? TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT Backup
Thanks Ed, When I was at Sungard (the DR Site) last week trying to figure out why I could not get Exchange to work I ran across what you mentioned in TechNet. I tried it and still could not get the restore to work but by the time I did that I might have screwed something else up that would not allow it to work. I backed up the exchange server last night with NTBackup and I will try and restore that next week on a recovery server. Backup Status Operation: Backup Active backup destination: DLT Media name: Media created 8/29/2001 at 12:59 PM Backup of RSDORG\RSDSITE\APP_SERV\Directory Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: FirstNTBACKUP Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 8/29/2001 at 1:06 PM. Backup completed on 8/29/2001 at 1:06 PM. Bytes: 9,978,138 Time: 11 seconds Media name: Media created 8/29/2001 at 12:59 PM Backup of RSDORG\RSDSITE\APP_SERV\Information Store Backup set #2 on media #1 Backup description: FirstNTBACKUP Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 8/29/2001 at 1:06 PM. Backup completed on 8/29/2001 at 1:29 PM. Bytes: 5,532,328,800 Time: 22 minutes and 52 seconds -- Verify Status Operation: Verify After Backup Active backup destination: DLT Verify of RSDORG\RSDSITE\APP_SERV\Directory Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: FirstNTBACKUP Verify started on 8/29/2001 at 1:30 PM. Verify completed on 8/29/2001 at 1:30 PM. Different: 0 Bytes: 9,978,138 Time: 2 seconds Verify of RSDORG\RSDSITE\APP_SERV\Information Store Backup set #2 on media #1 Backup description: FirstNTBACKUP Verify started on 8/29/2001 at 1:30 PM. Verify completed on 8/29/2001 at 1:49 PM. Different: 0 Bytes: 5,532,328,800 Time: 18 minutes and 53 seconds -- -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT Backup Please be aware that you can restore a backup taken with Backup Exec using NTBACKUP. For that reason, you may not need to license Backup Exec for your recovery server and just use NTBACKUP instead. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT Backup I am having so many problems with Backup exec, I am disgusted with it. Is anyone using NT Backup for exchange? Is there anything I should know? I don't care about the Brick level backup anymore, I just want to know that I can restore without a bunch of hassels in case of a disaster. Does anyone have any suggestions for scheduling? I will be using Windows 2000 server and DLT drive. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated. TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT Backup
Pete, I need Exchange administrator running on the backup server along with the same Exchange SP as the Exchange server is running, is there anything else? Thank you, Gordon -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT Backup I'm not using Windows 2000 server but am on NT 4.0 SP5. We use NTBACKUP to backup all our Exchange servers on the nightly basis. I send the corresponding log files to my account for verification on the daily basis using BLAT. You can create a command procedure and use the AT scheduler to launch the program at a designated time on the nightly basis. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT Backup I am having so many problems with Backup exec, I am disgusted with it. Is anyone using NT Backup for exchange? Is there anything I should know? I don't care about the Brick level backup anymore, I just want to know that I can restore without a bunch of hassels in case of a disaster. Does anyone have any suggestions for scheduling? I will be using Windows 2000 server and DLT drive. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated. TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forwarding email to a Palm
Yes, I have been using Blackberry for over two years. The sales people are showing prospects that they can order product over the net via the palm so they have to carry it anyway. I ended up creating a Distribution list and adding both the palm and their exchange email to that DL, this will work for what they need it for. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding email to a Palm I'll bet. I certainly wouldn't want it on my Palm. Gordon, Have you heard of the Blackberry? That little tool ROCKS!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding email to a Palm We did just what you are talking about (going the CR route). The users soon found that wireless email to the Palm was unreliable, slow, cumbersome, etc. Less than 2 days later they had me stop forwarding because they found it to be not worth the time and effort. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Forwarding email to a Palm CR's, but if they fill their mailbox(on the palm), it could very well spell disaster. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding email to a Palm all -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forwarding email to a Palm All or some? CR's for all, rules for some. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forwarding email to a Palm We have outside sales people who are using Palm 7's. We have tried to forward email from Outlook without success. We have tried to use the Office assistant and add a rule to have the email forwarded but cannot get the forwarding to work. What is the best way to forward mail to another email address from exchange? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
