Re: 2nd SMTP address
No. Jake - Original Message - From: "John Bricher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:00 PM Subject: 2nd SMTP address > Is it possible to setup Exchange 5.5 so that every time I create a mailbox > it automatically creates 2 SMTP addresses? (ex: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MEC early registration
I don't think I want to see Andy in his thong... That's scary Jake - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:07 AM Subject: RE: MEC early registration > Ill be the one selling Fish Tacos in front of the Hilton, while Andy does > his thong dance to attract customers. > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MEC early registration > > > Just got a note from the event coordinators for MEC. The $300 early > registration discount which was supposed to have expired yesterday has been > extended until August 16. Hope to see many of you at MEC. > > -tom > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Icy grip on the US
Who's Sequoia? Jake mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US You from Handleman? You know who Sequoia is? Jason > -Original Message- > From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > I don't know about the rest of you > But here in Detroit we haven't seen above freezing in over 3 > weeks Hell we are lucky if the real temp is above 20 F Let > alone the wind chills I believe the wind chills for this > morning we -14 F > > > Rob Weatherly > > > -Original Message- > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > -6 in Detroit at about 9AM > > Jason > > > -Original Message- > > From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:24 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > -9 this morning at 5:30 am when I came in. Indianapolis, IN. > > Don't know what the wind chill was, didn't care. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:11 AM > > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > @ 7:00 am it was 45 degrees, didn't even bother warming > the car up. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 8:04 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > Fricken COLD you little High School Boy!! :P > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 3:26 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > > > What is that in real temperature ? > > > > > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts > > dealing with > > > Exchange 2003 ** > > > -- > > > Martin Tuip > > > MVP Exchange > > > Exchange 2000 List owner > > > www.exchange-mail.org > > > www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 6:42 PM > > > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > > > > 12 degrees in NC last night... 9 the night before... > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:18 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: OT: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > > > > > > Whats this crap about a icy grip in the US that I see > in the news? > > > > > > > > Its 50 degrees outside, I think this is the first > January in Utah > > > > history that is hasn't snowed. I was at the park in shorts. > > > > > > > > e- > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
RE: Icy grip on the US
Last time I watched WWF was about 3 years agowho's "in" these days? But still see usual people on this list :-) Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US Sounds like a WWF person. -Original Message----- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US Who's Sequoia? Jake mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US You from Handleman? You know who Sequoia is? Jason > -Original Message- > From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > I don't know about the rest of you > But here in Detroit we haven't seen above freezing in over 3 > weeks Hell we are lucky if the real temp is above 20 F Let > alone the wind chills I believe the wind chills for this > morning we -14 F > > > Rob Weatherly > > > -Original Message- > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > -6 in Detroit at about 9AM > > Jason > > > -Original Message- > > From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:24 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > -9 this morning at 5:30 am when I came in. Indianapolis, IN. > > Don't know what the wind chill was, didn't care. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:11 AM > > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > @ 7:00 am it was 45 degrees, didn't even bother warming > the car up. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 8:04 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > Fricken COLD you little High School Boy!! :P > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 3:26 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > > > What is that in real temperature ? > > > > > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts > > dealing with > > > Exchange 2003 ** > > > -- > > > Martin Tuip > > > MVP Exchange > > > Exchange 2000 List owner > > > www.exchange-mail.org > > > www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 6:42 PM > > > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > > > > 12 degrees in NC last night... 9 the night before... > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:18 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: OT: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > > > > > > Whats this crap about a icy grip in the US that I see > in the news? > > > > > > > > Its 50 degrees outside, I think this is the first > January in Utah > > > > history that is hasn't snowed. I was at the park in shorts. > > > > > > > > e- > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailt
RE: Icy grip on the US
She's cute but she's too young for you, bud... Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US I don't watch that crap. I like American Idol. -Original Message----- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US Last time I watched WWF was about 3 years agowho's "in" these days? But still see usual people on this list :-) Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US Sounds like a WWF person. -----Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US Who's Sequoia? Jake mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US You from Handleman? You know who Sequoia is? Jason > -Original Message- > From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > I don't know about the rest of you > But here in Detroit we haven't seen above freezing in over 3 > weeks Hell we are lucky if the real temp is above 20 F Let > alone the wind chills I believe the wind chills for this > morning we -14 F > > > Rob Weatherly > > > -Original Message- > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > -6 in Detroit at about 9AM > > Jason > > > -Original Message- > > From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:24 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > -9 this morning at 5:30 am when I came in. Indianapolis, IN. > > Don't know what the wind chill was, didn't care. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:11 AM > > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > @ 7:00 am it was 45 degrees, didn't even bother warming > the car up. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 8:04 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > Fricken COLD you little High School Boy!! :P > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 3:26 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > > > What is that in real temperature ? > > > > > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts > > dealing with > > > Exchange 2003 ** > > > -- > > > Martin Tuip > > > MVP Exchange > > > Exchange 2000 List owner > > > www.exchange-mail.org > > > www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 6:42 PM > > > Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > > > > 12 degrees in NC last night... 9 the night before... > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:18 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: OT: Icy grip on the US > > > > > > > > > > > > Whats this crap about a icy grip in the US that I see > in the news? > > > > > > > > Its 50 degrees outside, I think this is the first > Janu
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
They probably hadn't seen you in person or picture What's up? Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN Yea, they told me I was handsome. - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:49 PM Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > They'll tell you anything to sell you a box. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > hp Services > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Depp, Dennis M. > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > That was the word I got at MEC. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > That's not what they told us, but this was at least 6 months ago. Things > may have changed since then. > > -Original Message- > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > According to the EMC engineers, they can do a hot split. No need to > stop and restart the services. > > Dennis > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > And do I really want to buy all those extra expensive EMC disks? And do > I really want to have to stop the Exchange services (albeit briefly) to > do the split? > > -Original Message- > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > While I do trust the EMC engineers, particularly after talking with > several of them at MEC, do I really want to go with a backup solution > that Microsoft does not fully support? > > Dennis > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > So no-one is using EMCs hot-split snapshot backup solution for Exchange > 2000? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 30 > > January 2003 09:48 Posted To: Exchange 55 list server > > Conversation: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > Reasonable. But usually a SAN means you also start looking at an > > enterprise backup solution. > > > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with > > > Exchange 2003 ** > > -- > > Martin Tuip > > MVP Exchange > > Exchange 2000 List owner > > www.exchange-mail.org > > www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ryan Finnesey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:31 AM > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > How is CommValt now a days ? > > > > > > Ryan, > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:25 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > We are planning to use Legato in this situation to backup our Exchange > > > database. > > > > Dennis Depp > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large Exchange > > 2000 cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup > > for our Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied > > with its performance. > > > > > > Bryan Walbert > > agere systems > > Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards > > MS Exchange/Windows Architect > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Phone: 610 712 5874 > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives:
RE: Server capacity
I think you can still buy external storage from HP/Compaq Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Server capacity With RAM prices where they are, I don't think it should be a problem getting that upgraded. I'm concerned about storage capacity. I have 7 hot swap bays, and given the age of the 4.3 drives, I want to make sure that we're very redundant. To do this, I've decided that we need a hot spare for every configured drive. If I go with RAID 1 for the swap and logs, I'll need three disks for that, which only leaves me 4 disks for RAID 5, which, with a hot spare, gives me about 9 gigs for mailboxes. We do a lot of publishing, so large files are the norm, and I think 9 gigs will be burned through pretty quickly. If I was to upgrade to 1 gig of RAM, that should take care of a lot of the swap performance problems. Will having the E2k log on a RAID 5 volume make a large difference, or is it more of a performance tweak? Thanks, Erick - Original Message - From: "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:54 AM Subject: RE: Server capacity > I think you will be OK, but if at all possible, add more RAM. I have run > win2k/E2k in 256MB and just logging in and running system administrator > thrashes the disk continuously. > > The textbook says you should use two of your disks in a mirror for the > Exchange logs, but with 50 users, I don't think it will make much > difference. On the other hand, you should realize the disaster recovery > implications of having the logs and store on the same disk. > > Also, having your swap on RAID5 is going to make swapping even more > painful. More reason to add more memory. > > Maybe you should consider using two of your disks in RAID1 for your swap > and E2K logs. Use the remainder in RAID5 for everything else. > > You might also want to consider running Exchange 5.5 on NT4 - > particularly if you can't add more RAM. > > Another thing to consider (as others have mentioned) is Linux & POP3. > Use Yahoo for your "public folders" and calendars. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Server capacity > > > I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial > constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper > stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. > If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have > a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't > set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it > puts on systems. > > Erick > > - Original Message - > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > > Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > > Tech Consultant > > hp Services > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin > > Blackstone > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Server capacity > > > > > > I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Server capacity > > > > > > I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I > > have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB > > drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an > > Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. > > > The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of > > > shared folders and calendars. > > > > I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange > > > up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the > > users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a > > non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have > > what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? > > > > Thanks, > > Erick > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >
RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5
Have you talk to Sybari? As far as I know, Sybari has nothing to do with the client... Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lawson, Ann F. Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5 Has anyone had problem with Antigen hanging Outlook on the client side and if so, what was the fix? I recently installed Antigen 7.0 SP1 on 13 servers. Three out of 13 servers are having performance issues such as taking more than a minute or more to send a simple message (with or without an attachment) within the same site, or to move a message from one folder to another. I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT 4.0 My priv.edb size is 50GB There are 1500 mailboxes on the mail servers that are having problems. Any help would be appreciated. Ann _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
Migrate and let them come forward if they have problems Maybe you can clean up some of them this way. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes What I am looking for are mailboxes like a helpdesk mailbox that multiple people have access to. I need to identify these mailboxes before we migrate. I have done every type of directory export that I can find and am not finding any properties that would help identify. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Mr. Hatley, actually the publicDelegates lists who had delegate rights to the mailbox...same as whomever is listed under options->delegates in Outlook. I don't believe this attribute will list those people that have been granted permissions outside the scope of delegate (like owner via properties of mailbox->permissions inside the outlook client). -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes See KB article 251390. According to what I've found in MSDN, you can get the Assoc-NT-Account, or primary Windows NT account, using ADSI, but not other accounts that might have permissions on a mailbox. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Well, I was actually looking for both...the publicdelegates worked great for finding out who has 'send on behalf of' permissions, that is step one, now I need to know mailboxes that have extra NT permissions. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes I was talking about NT permissions. Of course, this would apply to client permissions, which I now realize is what you were probably asking about. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes g... machine crashed and strangely it sent this mail. The attribute is 'publicDelegates'... I use perl and Net::LDAP... but I'm sure there are many other ways get this. jeff e. ___ hrm... if you already have AD in place.. I believe this info is in AD. The attribute is -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PR
RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
>From my previous life as a Project Manager to convert different mail systems to Exchange.. This was the best way to get this thing done.successfully. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes I wish it were that easy -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Migrate and let them come forward if they have problems Maybe you can clean up some of them this way. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes What I am looking for are mailboxes like a helpdesk mailbox that multiple people have access to. I need to identify these mailboxes before we migrate. I have done every type of directory export that I can find and am not finding any properties that would help identify. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Mr. Hatley, actually the publicDelegates lists who had delegate rights to the mailbox...same as whomever is listed under options->delegates in Outlook. I don't believe this attribute will list those people that have been granted permissions outside the scope of delegate (like owner via properties of mailbox->permissions inside the outlook client). -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes See KB article 251390. According to what I've found in MSDN, you can get the Assoc-NT-Account, or primary Windows NT account, using ADSI, but not other accounts that might have permissions on a mailbox. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Well, I was actually looking for both...the publicdelegates worked great for finding out who has 'send on behalf of' permissions, that is step one, now I need to know mailboxes that have extra NT permissions. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes I was talking about NT permissions. Of course, this would apply to client permissions, which I now realize is what you were probably asking about. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes g... machine crashed and strangely it sent this mail. The attribute is 'publicDelegates'... I use perl and Net::LDAP... but I'm sure there are many other ways get this. jeff e. ___ hrm... if you already have AD in place.. I believe this info is in AD. The attribute is -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes That can be scripted by someone who knows how. It's a little tricky in my experience, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes Does anyone know of a way to automate a way to extract a list of mailboxes that multiple users have access to. We are in the process of migrating Ex55 to 2000 and I have been asked to identify all mailboxes that more than one user accesses. Any suggestions would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://w
RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5
Recreation of the "Profile"?? Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edwards, Aaron Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5 I don't know about Exchange 5.5. But I we had big problems with Exchange 2000 hanging the outlook client when we had Antigen 7.0 (no SP) installed. We found that blowing away the user's outlook profile and recreating it fixed the problem. Keep in mind they will lose any settings they have on their Outlook shortcut bar. -Original Message- From: Lawson, Ann F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5 Has anyone had problem with Antigen hanging Outlook on the client side and if so, what was the fix? I recently installed Antigen 7.0 SP1 on 13 servers. Three out of 13 servers are having performance issues such as taking more than a minute or more to send a simple message (with or without an attachment) within the same site, or to move a message from one folder to another. I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT 4.0 My priv.edb size is 50GB There are 1500 mailboxes on the mail servers that are having problems. Any help would be appreciated. Ann _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
You are "sick". Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN lol I look much better after a few beers, or with lime juice in my eyes. - Original Message ----- From: "Jacob Jeong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:19 PM Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > They probably hadn't seen you in person or picture What's up? > > Jake > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > Yea, they told me I was handsome. > > - Original Message - > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:49 PM > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > They'll tell you anything to sell you a box. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > > Tech Consultant > > hp Services > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Depp, Dennis M. > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:26 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > That was the word I got at MEC. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > That's not what they told us, but this was at least 6 months ago. Things > > may have changed since then. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:15 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > According to the EMC engineers, they can do a hot split. No need to > > stop and restart the services. > > > > Dennis > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > And do I really want to buy all those extra expensive EMC disks? And do > > I really want to have to stop the Exchange services (albeit briefly) to > > do the split? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:16 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > While I do trust the EMC engineers, particularly after talking with > > several of them at MEC, do I really want to go with a backup solution > > that Microsoft does not fully support? > > > > Dennis > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > So no-one is using EMCs hot-split snapshot backup solution for Exchange > > 2000? > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 30 > > > January 2003 09:48 Posted To: Exchange 55 list server > > > Conversation: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > > > > > > > Reasonable. But usually a SAN means you also start looking at an > > > enterprise backup solution. > > > > > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with > > > > > Exchange 2003 ** > > > -- > > > Martin Tuip > > > MVP Exchange > > > Exchange 2000 List owner > > > www.exchange-mail.org > > > www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5
Don't ask.don't tell Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5 Mmmm blow away my users -Original Message- From: Haber, David J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5 I'm using Antigen 7.0 with E2K and I haven't had any problems with Outlook hanging. If I had to blow away all of my user's profiles and recreate them I look for another AV product for Exchange! -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5 I don't know about Exchange 5.5. But I we had big problems with Exchange 2000 hanging the outlook client when we had Antigen 7.0 (no SP) installed. We found that blowing away the user's outlook profile and recreating it fixed the problem. Keep in mind they will lose any settings they have on their Outlook shortcut bar. -Original Message- From: Lawson, Ann F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5 Has anyone had problem with Antigen hanging Outlook on the client side and if so, what was the fix? I recently installed Antigen 7.0 SP1 on 13 servers. Three out of 13 servers are having performance issues such as taking more than a minute or more to send a simple message (with or without an attachment) within the same site, or to move a message from one folder to another. I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT 4.0 My priv.edb size is 50GB There are 1500 mailboxes on the mail servers that are having problems. Any help would be appreciated. Ann _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: RE: redhat 8 and sendmail forums
www.sendmail.org or try this link...it's for RH6.2 though www.linuxgazette.com/issue58/okopnik2.html Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: redhat 8 and sendmail forums Being fed by the nipple of all things GUI, i need some help... I need to configure SENDMAIL on a REDHAT 8.0 Linux box. Would any of you guys know of any good lists/websites like this one where I could get NEWBIE advice. TIA ...knighTslayer... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: USER BATCH PROGRAM FOR NT
Resouce Kit. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Reed, Alexander Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: USER BATCH PROGRAM FOR NT NT. Does anyone have this?(addusers.exe) I cannot get on the internet at the moment. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: USER BATCH PROGRAM FOR NT I cant login. - Original Message - From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: USER BATCH PROGRAM FOR NT What happened when you went to http://www.google.com and typed in [bulk add users nt] ? -Original Message- From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: USER BATCH PROGRAM FOR NT Subject: USER BATCH PROGRAM FOR NT Is there a utility that will allow you to do a batch add of users for NT? I thought that there was one. Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Position
Can you telecommute? Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt MacLean Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Position If anyone is interested in an (Exchange) E-mail Administrator position in Chicago or know someone who is please contact me. My info is below: Matt MacLean Staffing Consultant 888-798-7380 #13 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Position
I'm way over that... .wonder there's age limit Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Position Must be at least 21. - Original Message - From: "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:51 AM Subject: RE: Position > Got a description? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt MacLean > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Position > > > If anyone is interested in an (Exchange) E-mail Administrator position > in Chicago or know someone who is please contact me. My info is below: > > Matt MacLean > Staffing Consultant > 888-798-7380 #13 > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migration Scenario
LDSU (from HP/Compaq and I have worked with someone who wrote that programit will do pretty much everything when it comes to import and export) might be the answer for all of your questions. It will cost you but not that much. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migration Scenario I wouldn't propose that I know enough about what you're doing to make a recommendation. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nuzman Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Migration Scenario Ed, For Exchange I agree with you. How about a Novell 4.11 to AD migration? That one I'm doing clean. Norris - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: RE: Migration Scenario > I seldom believe a "fresh start" is worth the extra effort required of > end users to deal with it. I believe it's usually easier to delete > the legacy junk you don't want to keep, something you should have been > doing all along through normal maintenenace. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bennett, > Joshua > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Migration Scenario > > > Hello all, > > Just wanted to bounce my plan for migrating from Ex 5.5 to 2000 to get > some feedback. > > I plan to bring up AD and EX2000 totally separate of the existing > production NT4/Ex5.5 multi-master domain structure (we are slimming > down from 8 NT domains to 1 AD Forest w/ 1 domain). I plan so migrate > the NT user accounts SID history and mail-enable all the new AD > accounts. I then plan to disable the IMC in Ex5.5 and export all the > users mailboxes to PST files and re-import them to their new Ex2K > mailboxes. The same will be done for all PF that we will carry > forward. > > I am thinking along these lines because I feel that an ADC will import > too much old legacy junk that we don't want on the new mail system. > > Am I missing any gotcha's here? Does what I propose to do sound > feasible? > > Thanks in advance for any an all advice offered. > > Josh Bennett > Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer > Cotelligent, Inc. > 401 Parkway Drive > Broomall, PA. 19008 > 610-359-5929 > www.cotelligent.com > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with ADC Public Folder CA...
>>Both of these errors indicate a problem with the account used by the ADC to connect to the Exchange 5.5 server<< I would look into that little more harder... Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McBee, Jim Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with ADC Public Folder CA... Hi folks: I am re-posting this. I sent it several hours ago, but it never arrived. I have configured a PF CA between an Exchange 5.5 server and the Active Directory. The user account I am using on the Exchange 5.5 side is the service account. The account to Windows is a member of Domain Admins. The other CA's for recipients, DLs, and custom recipients work just fine. W2K SP3 on all servers E2K SP3 and the E2K SP3 version of the ADC E2K is in "mixed mode" AD (only one domain) is in "native mode" Only 1 E2K server currently installed When the ADC PF CA runs, none of the folders are showing up in the domain's Microsoft Exchange System Objects container. I can see the public folders from Exchange 5.5 in Exchange System Manager in the Public Folders container, but they are not "mail-enabled". In event viewer, I see errors when the PF CA runs. The event ids are 8183 and 8270. Both of these errors indicate a problem with the account used by the ADC to connect to the Exchange 5.5 server. But the errors only display for system folders, not the regular public folders. However, the regular public folder directory information is NOT replicating to AD from 5.5. KB article 329047 suggests that the account has insufficient permissions, but it already has Service Account Admin on 5.5. Just for grins, we tried changing the account we were using to an account with just Permissions Admin. No dice. There are no errors that would indicate why we are not seeing the public folders in Microsoft Exchange System Objects. Any ideas? I'm tapped out. I have done a KB search, a Google search and looked through the list archives, but nothing seems relevant. Thanks! Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scnmail 3.8 or 3.52?
Very interesting.this sounds more like "outdated" materials. This sounds more like Scanmail 1.0 where ESE scanning was overlooked (other than Sybari). Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scnmail 3.8 or 3.52? I asked a couple of days ago on the official stance on which is "best" between Scanmail for Exchange 3.52 and 3.8 - this is the reply my vendor came back with (Trend don't provide direct support in the UK any more). I've read the readme's, and the comparison document on the Trend website and it's six of one, half a dozen of the other - what are you guys that use Scanmail running? Have to say I've had no problems with Trend in the three years I've been using them, so I've no reason to believe one version will cause more problems than the other. regards Paul -Original Message- Subject: RE: Scanmail Question I'd advise using ScanMail 3.52 (AVAPI/MAPI) due to the following limitations posed by the ESE API version (extracted from the readme.txt for ScanMail version 3.8 (ESE API): 4. Known Issues Trend Micro provides a free, online database called "SolutionBank", which provides answers to common questions, at: http://solutionbank.antivirus.com/solutions You can find this free resource under "Knowledge Base". After signing up, under Knowledge Base in the left navigator pane, select "Search Solutions". The contents of SolutionBank are being continuously updated, and new solutions are added daily. SolutionBank has the latest questions and answers. 1. Real-time Scan cannot send virus notification to recipients in the bcc: field using SMTP. "Undisclosed-Recipients" will be shown in the Real-time Scan Monitor. 2. ScanMail only reports one virus in multiple virus-infected documents and when multiple viruses are found in compressed files. 3. Outgoing SMTP mail will not be scanned since it does not go through the Information Store. 4. Real-time Scan zip file cleaning is not supported in this version. 5. "Move" action will not work if the infected message is in the Outlook 2000 Calendar. 6. ScanMail gets sender and recipient information from the message body instead of the SMTP header. If the user fakes the From: and To: field information, ScanMail will use the fake information to send notication and in saving to the log file. 7. POP3 or IMAP4 clients will display the original infected file name, even when the infected file is moved or deleted. 8. In an environment where an infected message is sent from a non-English Server to an English Server, message properties such as the sender may appear as unreadable characters. This effect will only be evident in logging, reporting, and notification. Any virus found will be still be removed. 9. User must select the "All users begin with common application settings" option when installing SMEX 3.8 to a Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server. I sincerely hope this helps. Should you require any further assistance, then please don't hesitate in contacting me on the details provided below. Best regards, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA not working
Take a look at your event logs and re-start the services. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA not working NT4 Exchange5.5 I just found out that my OWA was not working. I was only able to get to the logon screen. I enter my password and username and then that was it the browser just stay on the logon screen. It was working about two day ago. I have not done anything new to this box. Where should I start with this problem? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching an Exchange 2000 database for a text value
Exmerge. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Sorenson Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Searching an Exchange 2000 database for a text value Can anyone tell me if it's possible to search an Exchange 2000 database for a particular text string(s)? I need to extract all messages meeting a certain criteria. We use Promodag for reporting basic email usage, but this will not search the message body. TIA, Steve This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching an Exchange 2000 database for a text value
My apologies. Try TrendMicros. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Searching an Exchange 2000 database for a text value Exmerge will not help nor this Q article. He wants to search the message body. The others mentioned only scan subject text and attachment name. I haven't tried it yet but you might want to look at Ontracks new tools. Although it may only do as Exmerge and IISscan do. >This might help: >http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q224493 > >Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP >Freelance E-Mail Philosopher >Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Sorenson >Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: Searching an Exchange 2000 database for a text value > > >Can anyone tell me if it's possible to search an Exchange 2000 database >for a particular text string(s)? I need to extract all messages meeting >a certain criteria. > >We use Promodag for reporting basic email usage, but this will not >search the message body. > >TIA, > >Steve > > >This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan >service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working >around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com > > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
