RE: Outlook Bandwidth Recommendation
We are running 384 K fractional T1 with 20-30 active users. No Complaints. It sort of surprised me that we have had no complaints when we migrated from local servers to a Big central server. Brian -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Bandwidth Recommendation Whats the CIR on the frame? 384K, IMO, is cutting it a bit close for 30-40 users. -Original Message- From: ed Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Bandwidth Recommendation Howdy All! Our Network Team is looking for Outlook 2000/2002 bandwidth recommendation for our remote sites. The users are light mail users and will be homed on Exchange 2000. The sites are connected over a 384K frame circuit with 30-40 users. _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - - The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. = = _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Me To! -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I'll be there! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC OK, the time draws near. Who is going? Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
> I am trying to allow my programmers to develop an application that will > mail outside of our local domain. > > We are running the script on an IIS server. The problem is that while we > can deliver to our local domain ,mail going to outside domains fails. > > Our firewall only allows SMTP connections from our Exchange 2000 servers > and it appears that the IIS server is trying to send mail directly to the > remote domains. > > So I think my question is how do I force my IIS server to forward all > messages to my Exchange 2000 servers. Obviously I am missing something > simple but, danged if I can figure it out. > > Brian > Brian Narkinsky > System Manager > Department of Environmental Protection > MS 6520 > 2600 Blairstone RD > Tallahassee, FL 32399 > phone (850)488-1205 > fax (850)412-0400 > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
That was where I was screwing up. I tried looking for this everywhere but the logical place. IIS admin ->Default SMTPServer->properties ->Delivery->Advanced-> Smarthost Thanks Brian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange Tried specifying the Exchange server as the smart host? > -Original Message- > From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 5:27 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange > > > > > > I am trying to allow my programmers to develop an application that > > will mail outside of our local domain. > > > > We are running the script on an IIS server. The problem is > that while > > we can deliver to our local domain ,mail going to outside domains > > fails. > > > > Our firewall only allows SMTP connections from our Exchange 2000 > > servers and it appears that the IIS server is trying to send mail > > directly to the remote domains. > > > > So I think my question is how do I force my IIS server to > forward all > > messages to my Exchange 2000 servers. Obviously I am > missing something > > simple but, danged if I can figure it out. > > > > Brian > > Brian Narkinsky > > System Manager > > Department of Environmental Protection > > MS 6520 > > 2600 Blairstone RD > > Tallahassee, FL 32399 > > phone (850)488-1205 > > fax (850)412-0400 > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline
I'm not 100% sure but, I don't think teamed adapters are supported in a cluster. I'd have two unteamed adapters (+ an additional 1 for the heartbeat) going to different switches. Or just don't cluster I firmly believe that this will increase your availability or at least your saneness. Also make sure there is a DC as close as possible on the network. Brian -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline Seems to be a waste of money having a cluster when your network isn't redundant. Each node ought to have two "teamed" (to use HP ProLiant terminology) NICs, each of which is connected to as separate a network as possible. (Clustering seems a waste of money in most cases anyway.) Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Cluster Virtual services pending/offline Hi, When network connection become unavailable for an extend period of time (like working on switches, etc...) our clustered Exchanges services goes offline and have a hard time coming back to reality. Manual procedure does bring it back online, however, this defeats the purpose of cluster. In a non-cluster Exchange environment, it is not as dependent on the networking and all Exchange services does not go offline... Does anyone know how to set up the virtual services to not depend on connection state as much? Vitals: Exchange 2K Cluster (Active/Passive), Win 2K, all patched. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering Exchange
Don't do it. Been there done it you'll be sorry. Search the archives for cluster. We are moving away from a cluster and using hot spare server and booting off the SAN for redundancy. Brian -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Exchange Okay, we have been beating our heads around looking for a cluster option that will work for us, obviously Active/Active was shot down, because of the memory fragmentation, even though initially MS told us it could be done, for the meantime we are looking to just go Active/Passive, I was wondering though what the general consensus on going N+1 is. We are going to explore the possibility to go to this, but I wanted to get some opinions on it first. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup hardware
I think this is the way the world is headed. Disk are getting close (or sometimes even lower) to tape in cost per GB. http://www.alacritus.com/products/wp.html Brian Narkinsky -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup hardware I'm thinking of going to the USB2 external drive system for offsite storage, I can put together an 80mb system for under $200, and have 5 rotatable drives for about a grand. Except that the drives are a bit more heavy and sensitive to being thrown off a train, I don't see much downside, and I don't have to buy at least two tape drives plus media. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup hardware We've been using the VXA-1 drives for about 2 years now. Never had a problem. Been thinking about upgrading to the VXA-2 drive but I have too much money invested in the version 1 tapes. But once the version 1 drives are no longer viable for us I plan on moving to VXA's next product. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup hardware I saw the Exabyte VXA-2 drives and they appear to be quick (8MPS), large (80/160), decent media price ($80-$85) and a good price point ($925-$1250). Anyone know of their reliability? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup hardware I use a VXA tape drive and backup exec. Find them at vxa.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup hardware For those on the Yahoogroups list, my apologies for the duplicate... For those that are running E2K (or SPS or SQL2K or W2K, etc...) on your home or small business network... What are you using for hardware? I have 2 dedicated servers running W2K, E2K, SQL2K, ISA, SPS among other things as well as 8 workstation/servers that dual-boot. I have an OnStream ADR 15/30 drive but the drive is too small now and I am finding I am not backing up rather than fool with it. I have set my Exchange logs to circular and have realized I need to find a new tape drive for backup. I presently backup both local and across the wire for all 10 computers to one computer with the ADR 15/30 tape drive. What is the best/most reliable 60/120 hardware (and software you are using for it if it is not NTBackup) for those on a budget out there now? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Legato
By default it does clear the logs. Using the Client you can do a copy which doesn't. Legato itself can be a bear but, once you manage the GUI it is OK. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Legato I guess I will find out once I get into it but, does it kill the log files by default or is that should be set in the options. - Original Message - From: "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 5:13 PM Subject: RE: Legato > And the directory exchange is installed on > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey > Fyodorov > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 2:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Legato > > > With Exchange 2000, remember to create a directive to skip the M: > drive. > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 4:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Legato > > > I have been asked to work with Legato for backing up of Exchange 5.5 > and 2000 and also Window Servers. Anything that is a gotcha that I > should look out for. It will be my first time using this software. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
First name basis probably. Don't do it! You have been warned! Brian Narkinsky System Manager Department of Environmental Protection MS 6520 2600 Blairstone RD Tallahassee, FL 32399 phone (850)245-8314 fax (850)412-0400 -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN you'll get to know your PSS people and TAM very well. -Original Message- From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN Well the Microsoft Engineers seem to think it will work quite well. I will let you know how it works out. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN You can but shouldn't. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN I thought you couldn't cluster Exchange. BTW, we're running the same setup (albeit probably much smaller) and backing up using BE 8.6. We haven't run across any problems so far. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative. Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with a normal file backup from NetBackup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large > Exchange 2000 > cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup for our > Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied with its > performance. > > > Bryan Walbert > agere systems > Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards > MS Exchange/Windows Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 610 712 5874 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
EMC claims to have a supported solution. AS far as I know (and ran an EMC salesmen out of a meeting on this issue) it is not supported by MS. EMC's claim to support comes from a joint whitepaper they and MS did. To me that doesn't mean PSS can help. Snapshots I guess will be supported in Titanium but, until then tread carefully on them. Honestly not sure what advantage Snapshots give. Write the savesets to disk and then back that up. BRian Brian Narkinsky System Manager Department of Environmental Protection MS 6520 2600 Blairstone RD Tallahassee, FL 32399 phone (850)245-8314 fax (850)412-0400 -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN That was the word I got at MEC. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN That's not what they told us, but this was at least 6 months ago. Things may have changed since then. -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN According to the EMC engineers, they can do a hot split. No need to stop and restart the services. Dennis -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN And do I really want to buy all those extra expensive EMC disks? And do I really want to have to stop the Exchange services (albeit briefly) to do the split? -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN While I do trust the EMC engineers, particularly after talking with several of them at MEC, do I really want to go with a backup solution that Microsoft does not fully support? Dennis -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN So no-one is using EMCs hot-split snapshot backup solution for Exchange 2000? > -Original Message- > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 30 > January 2003 09:48 Posted To: Exchange 55 list server > Conversation: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > Reasonable. But usually a SAN means you also start looking at an > enterprise backup solution. > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with > Exchange 2003 ** > -- > Martin Tuip > MVP Exchange > Exchange 2000 List owner > www.exchange-mail.org > www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > - Original Message - > From: "Ryan Finnesey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:31 AM > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > How is CommValt now a days ? > > > Ryan, > > > -Original Message- > From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:25 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > We are planning to use Legato in this situation to backup our Exchange > database. > > Dennis Depp > > -Original Message- > From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN > > > What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large Exchange > 2000 cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup > for our Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied > with its performance. > > > Bryan Walbert > agere systems > Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards > MS Exchange/Windows Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 610 712 5874 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin
[Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes
Thought I'd try over here. Seems to be a bit more complicated than I thought. Brian -Original Message- From: Narkinsky, Brian Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes Is there a quick easy way to automate a report of all mailbox sizes. I can do an export list from ESM but, I was hoping to find a way to script it. Brian Brian Narkinsky System Manager Department of Environmental Protection MS 6520 2600 Blairstone RD Tallahassee, FL 32399 phone (850)488-1205 fax (850)412-0400 <> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--> Tied to your PC? Cut Loose and Stay connected with Yahoo! Mobile http://us.click.yahoo.com/QBCcSD/o1CEAA/sXBHAA/eJp0lB/TM -~-> Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes
Yes -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes Based on the subject line should we then assume this is an E2K server? > -Original Message- > From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:42 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes > > > Thought I'd try over here. Seems to be a bit more > complicated than I thought. > > Brian > > -----Original Message- > From: Narkinsky, Brian > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes > > > Is there a quick easy way to automate a report of all mailbox > sizes. I can do an export list from ESM but, I was hoping to > find a way to script it. > > Brian > > Brian Narkinsky > System Manager > Department of Environmental Protection > MS 6520 > 2600 Blairstone RD > Tallahassee, FL 32399 > phone (850)488-1205 > fax (850)412-0400 > > <> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > -~--> Tied to your PC? Cut Loose and Stay > connected with Yahoo! Mobile > http://us.click.yahoo.com/QBCcSD/o1CEAA/sXBHAA> /eJp0lB/TM > > > -- > ---~-> > > Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange 2000 FAQ: > http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
