RE: email address
Yes. Change your address and then, to help keep it from happening again, don't ever enter your email address on a website. If you must give a valid email address for some web site registration, use a throwaway address. If you're an admin on the exchange server (or know one) it's easy to do by creating a secondary email address in your AD account. Once you're done with the address, delete it from the account and you'll never get any spam even if that address is harvested. I have been doing this for a few months and I've not received a single spam on my new address. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering. --Freeman Dyson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: email address You are either being joe jobbed (search on Google for more information) or you are just unlucky. Spammers can spoof any email address for the reply. If I were you, I would change my email address as soon as possible. --- Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how can i stop someone using my email address? I got a number of these things: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from intas.be ([24.51.160.184]) by morpheus.intas.be with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 20:08:56 +0100 Received: from siwinski [24.51.160.184] by intas.be with eSMTP; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:08:45 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cu.rn as much as a pr0n star! upto 500% more! Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:08:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHP Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2003 19:08:57.0089 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2587F10:01C3A62B] Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus with XP
I've found a tool that helps with problems like this (Spyware, Adware, Browser hijackers, etc) and includes tools for prevention. Take a look at Spybot Search and Destroy at http://security.kolla.de/. I've been usgng it for a year and it works great (plus it's completely free.) Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering. --Freeman Dyson -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus with XP This work. Thank You everyone for your help. This is the best forum and the people are so helpful here. Thank You again Tony -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus with XP This is reminiscent of the QHosts-1 trojan: http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_100719.htm The information in the link will give you a few clues as to what might have been changed. Cheers, Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: 10 November 2003 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus with XP What is the name of this file and where is it location? -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus with XP Check to see if your local hosts file has a bunch of bogus entries. -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus with XP My home computer (window XP) was infected with virus and I clean it. Now when I open my browser and go to www.google.com it take me to another website www.cpanel.net. Has anyone seen this before and I do I fix this? Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products www.jetproducts.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise
We are preparing to upgrade from Exchange 2000 Standard Edition to Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition and I wanted to know if anyone out there has done this procedure before? Can you give me some ideas what to expect? Have you run into any problems? How long does it take and what impact does it have on the server. I appreciate any input you can offer. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store Size Question
Hmmm. Exchange services running but the store was dismounted. Do I need all services stopped to get accurate size or just STORE.EXE? What about the priv.stm file? I noticed that adding it to the EDB file was just over 16GB. Should I be looking there also? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering. --Freeman Dyson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file size. Sander -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 November 2003 08:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store Size Question I wanted to run this question by the experts to see if I could get a definitive answer. Our Private Store database reached it's 16GB limit and, on looking at the files, we found that the Priv.edb file was only 12.4GB. Can anyone tell me how Exchange 2000 figures the 16GB for the size of the store? Is there some explanation for the missing 3.6GB? I appreciate your input. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering. --Freeman Dyson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store Size Question
Thanks for the information and the tip. I had found the same information in the MSKB and used it to get the store mounted and do some housecleaning. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering. --Freeman Dyson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question The 16GB limit applies to the size of the EDB and STM files added together. Also, see this: http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/09/temporarily_inc.html Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Posted At: 11 November 2003 06:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: Information Store Size Question Subject: Information Store Size Question I wanted to run this question by the experts to see if I could get a definitive answer. Our Private Store database reached it's 16GB limit and, on looking at the files, we found that the Priv.edb file was only 12.4GB. Can anyone tell me how Exchange 2000 figures the 16GB for the size of the store? Is there some explanation for the missing 3.6GB? I appreciate your input. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering. --Freeman Dyson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
An update for all those following this thread. Last night we separated the Exchange server from the main backup job and both ran flawlessly. Amazing. Wonder what Veritas will have to say about that... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yup. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you tried to uninstall the Agent then reinstall? Just a thought... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you had such success from day one? Were there issues in the beginning and, if so, what solutions did you put in place? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 We're using BE9.0 as well and back up a total of about 10 servers. The Exchange server is the last one on the list, and we have never had it fail. Backup rate is SWEET! As well. Sitting pretty at about 850mb/min with Exchange. Love that SDLT tape drive! Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:02 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Subject: Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yea, we went through all that as well. I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck. Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds.. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the changes to BEX9 includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is that, communications failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail from that point. Example, Exchange server third out of 15, first 2 servers backup successfully, Exchange gets error, job throws up hands in confusion and doesn't attempt to backup any other servers. 13 servers fail... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Maybe just changing the order would work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers in one job. Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will update the list with results. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors
RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL
You could also try simplifying the process of importing the meetings/events using the Slipstick transmit holiday form. http://www.slipstick.com/dev/olforms/holiday.htm. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL I don't think the problem was adding members to a DL, but rather getting the appointment onto the calendars of new members automagically. -Original Message- From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:25 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL The other option is to upgrade to the 2003 family of products (Windows 2003 with AD 2003) and Exchange 2003 and use Query Based Distribution Groups (you can then include all mailboxes and when a new one is created it will automatically be a member). For the organisation I work with the Query based group is the killer reason for moving to Exchange 2003 (plus OWA)... My 0.02 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wade Robinson Sent: 26 August 2003 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Thanks I am going to suggest we add this to the new account creation process or hire developer if it is that important. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 3:03 PM Posted To: Exchange List Server Conversation: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Subject: RE: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL Without some coding? I don't think so. Do you have a new hire workflow? Can this step be added to it? i.e. once the employee has had his/her accounts created, have the CEO's admin add this person to the invitee list, and then send an Update only to changed people. You could import from a Vcal or PST file, but it won't capture any changes made to the original meeting request. -Original Message- From: Wade Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: reocurring appointments assinged to a DL MY CEO has a mandatory monthly meeting that he has assigned to our all employee distribution list. He is very bitter that each time we get a new employee the meeting does not automatically show up on their calendar. Is there any way to have the meeting automatically show up in the new use calendar? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Logout page not displaying
I recently had the same issue and I believe running through the process to manually sync the IWAM and IUSR accounts between the Active Directory and the metabase. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Logout page not displaying Hi list, having a small problem with our OWA clients receiving a HTTP 500 - Internal server error The page cannot be displayed, when logging out of OWA. If I turn off friendly http errors I receive, Server Application Error The server has encountered an error while loading an application during the processing of your request. Please refer to the event log for more detail information. Please contact the server administrator for assistance The event log on the cluster has this entry Event ID 36: The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/100/Root Have found several articles relating to similar IIS issues but nothing specific to exchange. Most articles seem to point to the IWAM_MACHINENAME and IUSR_MACHINENAME not being in sync. Anyone experiencd this problem? Cheers Richard *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4 Question: Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion of the backup. Final error code: a00084f8 HEX Final error description: A timeout occurred waiting for data from the agent during operation shutdown. We have been working with support for a couple months and they keep pointing at network problems but aren't offering much more help on what types of problems to look for. As far as we can tell we are a standard network setup; Windows 2000 Active Directory, all up to date on service packs; one Exchange server and one SQL server (separate machines); no apparent network problems or bottlenecks in everyday operations. We've tried setting the ports explicitly to 100mb Full duplex at the Exchange server, backup server and switch ports. We tried stopping our ScanMail application also and verified that none of the Exchange maintenance tasks were running at the time of the backup. Is there anyone out there that might be able to offer any more suggestions on how to troubleshoot these problems? We are not getting reliable backups and are looking for whatever help we can find. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers in one job. Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will update the list with results. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Other than Andy's suggestion of trying NTBackup, have you looked to see that the Backup Exec agent is running with sufficient rights? SP4 for Win2k changes some of the permissions levels to better match Win2k3's permissions model, and quite specifically it changes network permissions. Windows 2000 .Net magazine had a web article about it not too long ago, which I stumbled across the other day. http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=39534 From the article: One end result is that some programs, plus services not under control of svchost.exe, might not behave as expected when they logon with an account that does not have the 'Impersonate a client after authentication' right. I wonder if that's not the cause of the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4 Question: Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion of the backup. Final error code: a00084f8 HEX Final error description: A timeout occurred waiting for data from the agent during operation shutdown. We have been working with support for a couple months and they keep pointing at network problems but aren't offering much more help on what types of problems to look for. As far as we can tell we are a standard network setup; Windows 2000 Active Directory, all up to date on service packs; one Exchange server and one SQL server (separate machines); no apparent network problems or bottlenecks in everyday operations. We've tried setting the ports explicitly to 100mb Full duplex at the Exchange server, backup server and switch ports. We tried stopping our ScanMail application also and verified that none of the Exchange maintenance tasks were running at the time of the backup. Is there anyone out there that might be able to offer any more suggestions on how to troubleshoot these problems? We are not getting reliable backups and are looking for whatever help we can find. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Interesting. We were having occasional but rare problems with 8.6 but not specific to any one server. Veritas kept pointing the finger at network problems but no real useful information about what kind of problems. We would tweak here and change there and the problems would go away for a while. I'm willing to accept the possibility that there may be networking or server performance issues affecting the backups. The problem I have is there are no other symptoms on my network of similar issues and so far no one can tell me how to find anything concrete. I'm certainly open to suggestions along these lines as well if anyone out there has any thoughts. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Blimy! I had the same problems with 8.6. Different error message, but it would fail at least 2 times a week when it was part of a bigger job. I wound up separating it and by itself it ran fine. Forgot completely about that. Never could explain why. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:43 AM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers in one job. Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will update the list with results. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Other than Andy's suggestion of trying NTBackup, have you looked to see that the Backup Exec agent is running with sufficient rights? SP4 for Win2k changes some of the permissions levels to better match Win2k3's permissions model, and quite specifically it changes network permissions. Windows 2000 .Net magazine had a web article about it not too long ago, which I stumbled across the other day. http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=39534 From the article: One end result is that some programs, plus services not under control of svchost.exe, might not behave as expected when they logon with an account that does not have the 'Impersonate a client after authentication' right. I wonder if that's not the cause of the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4 Question: Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion of the backup. Final error code: a00084f8 HEX Final error description: A timeout occurred waiting for data from the agent during operation shutdown. We have been working with support for a couple months and they keep pointing at network problems but aren't offering much more help on what types of problems to look for. As far as we can tell we are a standard network setup; Windows 2000 Active Directory, all up to date on service packs; one Exchange server and one SQL server (separate machines); no apparent network problems or bottlenecks in everyday operations. We've tried setting the ports explicitly to 100mb Full duplex at the Exchange server, backup server and switch ports. We tried stopping our ScanMail application also and verified that none of the Exchange maintenance tasks were running at the time of the backup. Is there anyone out there that might be able to offer any more suggestions on how to troubleshoot these problems? We are not getting reliable backups and are looking for whatever help we can find. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe
RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the changes to BEX9 includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is that, communications failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail from that point. Example, Exchange server third out of 15, first 2 servers backup successfully, Exchange gets error, job throws up hands in confusion and doesn't attempt to backup any other servers. 13 servers fail... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Maybe just changing the order would work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers in one job. Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will update the list with results. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Other than Andy's suggestion of trying NTBackup, have you looked to see that the Backup Exec agent is running with sufficient rights? SP4 for Win2k changes some of the permissions levels to better match Win2k3's permissions model, and quite specifically it changes network permissions. Windows 2000 .Net magazine had a web article about it not too long ago, which I stumbled across the other day. http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=39534 From the article: One end result is that some programs, plus services not under control of svchost.exe, might not behave as expected when they logon with an account that does not have the 'Impersonate a client after authentication' right. I wonder if that's not the cause of the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4 Question: Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion of the backup. Final error code: a00084f8 HEX Final error description: A timeout occurred waiting for data from the agent during operation shutdown. We have been working with support for a couple months and they keep pointing at network problems but aren't offering much more help on what types of problems to look for. As far as we can tell we are a standard network setup; Windows 2000 Active Directory, all up to date on service packs; one Exchange server and one SQL server (separate machines); no apparent network problems or bottlenecks in everyday operations. We've tried setting the ports explicitly to 100mb Full duplex at the Exchange server, backup server and switch ports. We tried stopping our ScanMail application also and verified that none of the Exchange maintenance tasks were running at the time of the backup. Is there anyone out there that might be able to offer any more suggestions on how to troubleshoot these problems? We are not getting reliable backups and are looking for whatever help we can find. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Have you had such success from day one? Were there issues in the beginning and, if so, what solutions did you put in place? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 We're using BE9.0 as well and back up a total of about 10 servers. The Exchange server is the last one on the list, and we have never had it fail. Backup rate is SWEET! As well. Sitting pretty at about 850mb/min with Exchange. Love that SDLT tape drive! Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:02 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Subject: Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yea, we went through all that as well. I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck. Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds.. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the changes to BEX9 includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is that, communications failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail from that point. Example, Exchange server third out of 15, first 2 servers backup successfully, Exchange gets error, job throws up hands in confusion and doesn't attempt to backup any other servers. 13 servers fail... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Maybe just changing the order would work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers in one job. Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will update the list with results. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Other than Andy's suggestion of trying NTBackup, have you looked to see that the Backup Exec agent is running with sufficient rights? SP4 for Win2k changes some of the permissions levels to better match Win2k3's permissions model, and quite specifically it changes network permissions. Windows 2000 .Net magazine had a web article about it not too long ago, which I stumbled across the other day. http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=39534 From the article: One end result is that some programs, plus services not under control of svchost.exe, might not behave as expected when they logon with an account that does not have the 'Impersonate a client after authentication' right. I wonder if that's not the cause of the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4 Question: Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion
RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Yup. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you tried to uninstall the Agent then reinstall? Just a thought... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you had such success from day one? Were there issues in the beginning and, if so, what solutions did you put in place? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 We're using BE9.0 as well and back up a total of about 10 servers. The Exchange server is the last one on the list, and we have never had it fail. Backup rate is SWEET! As well. Sitting pretty at about 850mb/min with Exchange. Love that SDLT tape drive! Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:02 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Subject: Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yea, we went through all that as well. I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck. Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds.. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the changes to BEX9 includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is that, communications failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail from that point. Example, Exchange server third out of 15, first 2 servers backup successfully, Exchange gets error, job throws up hands in confusion and doesn't attempt to backup any other servers. 13 servers fail... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Maybe just changing the order would work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers in one job. Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will update the list with results. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Other than Andy's suggestion of trying NTBackup, have you looked to see that the Backup Exec agent is running with sufficient rights? SP4 for Win2k changes some of the permissions levels to better match Win2k3's permissions model, and quite specifically it changes network permissions. Windows 2000 .Net magazine had a web article about it not too long ago, which I stumbled across the other day. http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=39534 From the article: One end result is that some programs, plus services not under control of svchost.exe, might
RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain
Thanks again Ed for the prompt response. It seems the RUS was the solution. By Monday morning when we tried again, everything was working as expected. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain Without the RUS, objects don't get properly stamped with necessary mail attributes. I can't say how long you should wait. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain Yes to both, although only about 20 minutes ago on the Recipient update service. Am I now dealing with replication delay? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain Also, did you create a recipient update service for that new domain? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain I didn't have any luck in the archives or MSKB and I know this is probably a simple question so, flame away if you must; I'm short on time and resources and I hope someone will look kindly on me and offer some help or advice. My situation: In order to support a new subsidiary company, we have created a new child domain under our single domain forest which also contains our Exchange 2000 organization. Everything is running in Exchange 2000 SP3 except the domain controllers which are all running SP4. My Problem: I can create users in the new domain in AD Users and Computers including creating the mailbox and configuring the mailbox properties. But when I attempt to log that user in to Exchange with Outlook, I get The name could not be resolved. The name could not be matched to a name in the address list. Also, when I look in the GAL I don't see this user (we're using the same GAL for now) and I don't see a mailbox in ESM in our information store. Please if anyone can offer assistance, we would be extremely thankful. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain
I didn't have any luck in the archives or MSKB and I know this is probably a simple question so, flame away if you must; I'm short on time and resources and I hope someone will look kindly on me and offer some help or advice. My situation: In order to support a new subsidiary company, we have created a new child domain under our single domain forest which also contains our Exchange 2000 organization. Everything is running in Exchange 2000 SP3 except the domain controllers which are all running SP4. My Problem: I can create users in the new domain in AD Users and Computers including creating the mailbox and configuring the mailbox properties. But when I attempt to log that user in to Exchange with Outlook, I get The name could not be resolved. The name could not be matched to a name in the address list. Also, when I look in the GAL I don't see this user (we're using the same GAL for now) and I don't see a mailbox in ESM in our information store. Please if anyone can offer assistance, we would be extremely thankful. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain
Yes to both, although only about 20 minutes ago on the Recipient update service. Am I now dealing with replication delay? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain Also, did you create a recipient update service for that new domain? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain I didn't have any luck in the archives or MSKB and I know this is probably a simple question so, flame away if you must; I'm short on time and resources and I hope someone will look kindly on me and offer some help or advice. My situation: In order to support a new subsidiary company, we have created a new child domain under our single domain forest which also contains our Exchange 2000 organization. Everything is running in Exchange 2000 SP3 except the domain controllers which are all running SP4. My Problem: I can create users in the new domain in AD Users and Computers including creating the mailbox and configuring the mailbox properties. But when I attempt to log that user in to Exchange with Outlook, I get The name could not be resolved. The name could not be matched to a name in the address list. Also, when I look in the GAL I don't see this user (we're using the same GAL for now) and I don't see a mailbox in ESM in our information store. Please if anyone can offer assistance, we would be extremely thankful. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf
For the rule, replace the From [user] criteria with contains [text] in the message header and then put the name in the [text] position. This should catch even the sent on behalf of messages. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Rule - Send on Behalf Hi, I receive multiple emails that are 'sent on behalf' of Data Center. The rule I have created never works. I specifically must state who the email is being sent from, in this case Brian Hale, for the rule to work. This is the from the email: From: Brian Hale On Behalf Of Data Center My question is: Can you create a rule that works even when the email is 'sent on behalf of'? Is there a better way to do this? Perhaps this is a design problem? Has anyone else run into this issue and if so how did you work around it? Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ScanMail missing tricks?
We had this issue a while back when we first started using ScanMail. We found out from Trend that when ScanMail runs in MAPI mode, it doesn't scan the attachments until AFTER the message is in the inbox; which leaves the possibility if the server is extremely busy scanning, the user could see and even open the message before the scanner gets to it. The solution was to run ScanMail in AVAPI mode instead. This mode intercepts attachments before they reach the IS. Just be sure you have upgraded to the latest version of ScanMail and the latest Exchange SP first as there have been issues with AVAPI mode in earlier versions crashing the IS. Check the list archives for this topic. I know it was discussed here a couple years ago. Good Luck. Ray _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
I have an update on this issue for those of you still following it, and another question. First, I am still in the process of getting the latest version of ScanMail (6.1) from Trend. Apparently 5.1 is no longer supported and they won't talk to me until I get up to date. Also, the problem has been accelerating; we are now seeing the services crash daily and sometimes multiple times daily. The question is, do any of you out there who have heard of this issue also have a MetaFrame server in your organization and have you seen it acting strangely as well? We have seen, on several occasions, the MetaFrame server's WWW Publishing Service stop unexpectedly at around the same time as the Exchange services go down. As always, I welcome any input or suggestions. Thanks...Ray -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no indications of infection on the server. I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help. Thanks in advance... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
Thanks again. Have you been able to confirm what version of ScanMail you are using with that build number. I'm still wrestling with Trend to get my serial number for 6.1. Apparently we never got notified our maintenance was up and I had to renew again. Took 3 days to figure that out. Then they told me it would take another 2 days to get the serial number, meanwhile server is failing to send and receive internet mail a couple times a day and the bosses are getting hot. I love their products but Trends licensing really pisses me off! Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... Ever since I did the update on scanmail, our problem went away. We don't have a metaframe server but almost the same thing happened to 2 of my exchange servers (we have 7). The WWW service would go down almost at the same time on both servers. I originally thought we were hit by a virus but I did a scan and both servers were clean. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have an update on this issue for those of you still following it, and another question. First, I am still in the process of getting the latest version of ScanMail (6.1) from Trend. Apparently 5.1 is no longer supported and they won't talk to me until I get up to date. Also, the problem has been accelerating; we are now seeing the services crash daily and sometimes multiple times daily. The question is, do any of you out there who have heard of this issue also have a MetaFrame server in your organization and have you seen it acting strangely as well? We have seen, on several occasions, the MetaFrame server's WWW Publishing Service stop unexpectedly at around the same time as the Exchange services go down. As always, I welcome any input or suggestions. Thanks...Ray -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no indications of infection on the server. I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help. Thanks in advance... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english
FW: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken.
Oops. Apparently I was naughty. My apologies to any mail servers I have offended. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:55 AM To: Ray Beckwith Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken. Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Ray Beckwith Subject = RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... Delivery Time = June 06, 2003 (Friday) 11:54:34 Policy = Dirty Words Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
Tried that. It told me that my server does not support trial version upgrades. When I told that to the licensing rep at Trend, she did say she would deliver the paperwork in person and be sure it gets done ASAP. I just don't know if ASAP means today or 47.5 hours instead of 48. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... I think you can install it in trial mode for about 30 days then apply the key later when you get it. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... Thanks again. Have you been able to confirm what version of ScanMail you are using with that build number. I'm still wrestling with Trend to get my serial number for 6.1. Apparently we never got notified our maintenance was up and I had to renew again. Took 3 days to figure that out. Then they told me it would take another 2 days to get the serial number, meanwhile server is failing to send and receive internet mail a couple times a day and the bosses are getting hot. I love their products but Trends licensing really pisses me off! Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... Ever since I did the update on scanmail, our problem went away. We don't have a metaframe server but almost the same thing happened to 2 of my exchange servers (we have 7). The WWW service would go down almost at the same time on both servers. I originally thought we were hit by a virus but I did a scan and both servers were clean. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have an update on this issue for those of you still following it, and another question. First, I am still in the process of getting the latest version of ScanMail (6.1) from Trend. Apparently 5.1 is no longer supported and they won't talk to me until I get up to date. Also, the problem has been accelerating; we are now seeing the services crash daily and sometimes multiple times daily. The question is, do any of you out there who have heard of this issue also have a MetaFrame server in your organization and have you seen it acting strangely as well? We have seen, on several occasions, the MetaFrame server's WWW Publishing Service stop unexpectedly at around the same time as the Exchange services go down. As always, I welcome any input or suggestions. Thanks...Ray -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could
Exchange and AD Question
This question may be a little off the list subject but you guys are some of the best authorities I know so I wanted your opinions. (Note the subtle butt-kissing) Situation: Single domain forest with single Exchange Server and total 4 DC. About 85 Employees. Class C IP block with fixed IP addresses for all. We are in the process of starting up a new venture company and want to keep them relatively separate from our main organization so as they grow, they can be easily separated if so chosen. We have our web presence under ourcompany.org and have reserved a domain theircompany.com for the new company's web presence. We have also set up recipient policies in Exchange to receive email sent to theircompany.com for the first couple users we have set up in our domain. Question. What would be the best way to set up this new company in our AD organization to meet the requirements of easy separation in the future, while allowing us to continue serving them with our single Exchange server and with minimal additional expense and complexity. We have been looking into the possibility of setting up a child domain for them so that they can have separate security and domain suffix but are unsure if we can do this without adding a subnet or some other complexity. I appreciate any opinions or recommendations from the wise ones of the list (more butt-kissing). Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and AD Question
But, we found a reference that said that an Exchange server could not serve 2 trees without a third party application. Is my information bad on that subject? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and AD Question You want a separate TREE in the forest, not a child domain. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and AD Question This question may be a little off the list subject but you guys are some of the best authorities I know so I wanted your opinions. (Note the subtle butt-kissing) Situation: Single domain forest with single Exchange Server and total 4 DC. About 85 Employees. Class C IP block with fixed IP addresses for all. We are in the process of starting up a new venture company and want to keep them relatively separate from our main organization so as they grow, they can be easily separated if so chosen. We have our web presence under ourcompany.org and have reserved a domain theircompany.com for the new company's web presence. We have also set up recipient policies in Exchange to receive email sent to theircompany.com for the first couple users we have set up in our domain. Question. What would be the best way to set up this new company in our AD organization to meet the requirements of easy separation in the future, while allowing us to continue serving them with our single Exchange server and with minimal additional expense and complexity. We have been looking into the possibility of setting up a child domain for them so that they can have separate security and domain suffix but are unsure if we can do this without adding a subnet or some other complexity. I appreciate any opinions or recommendations from the wise ones of the list (more butt-kissing). Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and AD Question
In either the child-domain or new tree scenario, is there a need to separate them onto a subnet or can they just be assigned IP addresses from our existing class C block? I wanted to clarify that this was one of the important questions that I have not been able to find a definitive answer on Thanks again for your assistance. ...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and AD Question My understanding is that so long as it is all part of the same root forest you should have no problem with that. If I am wrong I am sure someone here will be more than happy to correct me. Scott -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and AD Question But, we found a reference that said that an Exchange server could not serve 2 trees without a third party application. Is my information bad on that subject? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and AD Question You want a separate TREE in the forest, not a child domain. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and AD Question This question may be a little off the list subject but you guys are some of the best authorities I know so I wanted your opinions. (Note the subtle butt-kissing) Situation: Single domain forest with single Exchange Server and total 4 DC. About 85 Employees. Class C IP block with fixed IP addresses for all. We are in the process of starting up a new venture company and want to keep them relatively separate from our main organization so as they grow, they can be easily separated if so chosen. We have our web presence under ourcompany.org and have reserved a domain theircompany.com for the new company's web presence. We have also set up recipient policies in Exchange to receive email sent to theircompany.com for the first couple users we have set up in our domain. Question. What would be the best way to set up this new company in our AD organization to meet the requirements of easy separation in the future, while allowing us to continue serving them with our single Exchange server and with minimal additional expense and complexity. We have been looking into the possibility of setting up a child domain for them so that they can have separate security and domain suffix but are unsure if we can do this without adding a subnet or some other complexity. I appreciate any opinions or recommendations from the wise ones of the list (more butt-kissing). Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: Messages supposedly not being deleted
I see a couple possibilities. 1. They are using POP3 or IMAP connection and have the mailbox set to leave messages on the server when they download. 2. They are using Outlook in Corporate/Workgroup mode over the VPN but are working offline and not synchronizing the offline folder after reading/deleting the messages. Either possibility should be relatively easy to diagnose over the phone with the user. If you have them look in their Tools menu, you can tell what mode they are in by seeing if they have the Services or Accounts selection. Services means Corporate or Workgroup, Accounts means Internet Only. From there, you can either check their offline folder settings in CW mode or have them uncheck the Leave Messages on Server option in their account advanced settings for Internet Only. Good luck. Outlook 2000 Exchange 5.5 SP4 VPN access over broadband. We have a user with a computer at home they use to access their coporate email. They are saying that messages that they have deleted in that Outlook profile are not showing as deleted when they get back into the office. We don't have the ability to get in front of this box to see how it is (mis)configured. They are not using pop3 or IMAP. This is not happening to anyone else on the same server. What I am wondering is if anyone has seen this behavoir when accessing the mailbox from 2 different profiles. TIA Ken _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no indications of infection on the server. I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help. Thanks in advance... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
Yup. Just got the following from another member as well. - Ray, I had a customer of ours have this problem with Trend.. And it went away when he changed how Trend was scanning for Viruses, either on commit or via SMTP sink, but NOT both. He had thought it was our iHateSpam Server product, but it was Trend. Regards, Bob Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... We had the same issue about a month ago. By any chance, are you using Trend scanmail? -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no indications of infection on the server. I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help. Thanks in advance... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
Gracias. I will do so. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... You'd have to call them and ask for it. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Fantastic. How do I get it? I don't see it in their downloads section. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... They have a hotfix -- Build 1178 from March 6, 2003. -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions I had this issue with Scan Mail last week... They have yet to completely fix it Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... Yup. Just got the following from another member as well. - Ray, I had a customer of ours have this problem with Trend.. And it went away when he changed how Trend was scanning for Viruses, either on commit or via SMTP sink, but NOT both. He had thought it was our iHateSpam Server product, but it was Trend. Regards, Bob Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... We had the same issue about a month ago. By any chance, are you using Trend scanmail? -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no indications of infection on the server. I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help. Thanks in advance... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day
OT: To Great Cthulhu Jones
A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name... Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You pronounce it the same way it is spelled. Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1] [1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot Open OWA Logoff Page
Strange. I couldn't find it by article number either. Here is the link. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q318239 Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 9:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Open OWA Logoff Page I don't see that KB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cannot Open OWA Logoff Page I have a problem with OWA in Exchange 2000, SP2 that has me stumped. Recently we noticed that when you click the Logoff button from Outlook Web Access, the page generates an error HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error rather than the logoff page. It happens to all users regardless of security settings or whether they are inside or outside the firewall. I found MSKB article Q318329 and tried the suggested fix, but that didn't help and I can find no other clues. Any ideas on this one? Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cannot Open OWA Logoff Page
I have a problem with OWA in Exchange 2000, SP2 that has me stumped. Recently we noticed that when you click the Logoff button from Outlook Web Access, the page generates an error HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error rather than the logoff page. It happens to all users regardless of security settings or whether they are inside or outside the firewall. I found MSKB article Q318329 and tried the suggested fix, but that didn't help and I can find no other clues. Any ideas on this one? Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K Deferred Delivery and Receive Date
We have discovered a strange issue that started when we upgraded our Exchange 5.5 server (running on Windows NT 4 SP 6a) to Exchange 2000 on Windows 2000 (both at SP2) The issue happens to anyone who sends a message from Outlook 2000 with deferred delivery set either through View, Options, Do Not Deliver Before or File, Properties, Send Options, Exchange Server, Send message after The recipient receives the message after the appropriate deferral time but the receive timestamp on the message is always equal to the time sent. This creates a problem for us as, when viewing the inbox sorted by receive date, the deferred messages will show up somewhere in then middle and can cause confusion. If anyone has seen this or has any ideas on how to troubleshoot the issue, please let me know. We really want to be able to use the message deferral in E2K but this problem makes is practically useless. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date
I have another issue that appears to be related to our upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 that I could use your input on. Since the upgrade, when senders use either of the deferred delivery options (view, options and set do not deliver before [date] or File, Properties, Send Options, Microsoft Exchange Server and set the Send this item delay time) the item is sent with the Send Date and Received Date equal to the date it was originally sent. In Exchange 5.5, the Received Date was set to the deferral date. This is causing issues with the deferred messages and users who sort their inboxes by the received date. Any suggestions about this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date
It reproduces consistently on at least 3 systems. All latest SP. If no one else has an idea, I'll have to contact PSS. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date If you can reproduce it, it sounds like a bug. If you're running the latest SP on Exchange, I'd call PSS. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date I have another issue that appears to be related to our upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 that I could use your input on. Since the upgrade, when senders use either of the deferred delivery options (view, options and set do not deliver before [date] or File, Properties, Send Options, Microsoft Exchange Server and set the Send this item delay time) the item is sent with the Send Date and Received Date equal to the date it was originally sent. In Exchange 5.5, the Received Date was set to the deferral date. This is causing issues with the deferred messages and users who sort their inboxes by the received date. Any suggestions about this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking
I discovered the cause of my last name resolving issue. It seems that, in our in-place upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, only the display name was transferred to Active Directory. When I filled in the First and Last Name fields for a particular record, the last name would resolve correctly. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking How to Change Active Directory Display Names: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q300427 Change Display Names of Active Directory Users with ADSI Script: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q277717 - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 5:07 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking Point taken. Maybe I can find an answer searching the Windows KB. I keep forgetting that Exchange is integrated into AD now. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking Don't blame in on Exchange, it's and AD problem. Exchange no longer owns user accounts. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:59 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking So, what you are saying is, I can only search in the order the names are displayed. Again I say, could Exchange 2000 be stupider than 5.5? In 5.5 we could search on any string of characters anywhere in the name and it would resolve Example to get Johan Sebastian Bach, I could simply type bast and, if no other names in the GAL had that string in them, it would resolve. Also, if it resolved multiple names from the string typed in, you would be prompted to chose from the list. This is the functionality I am looking for again. I can't believe that upgrading to Exchange 2000 will end up being a step backwards on this issue. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking You will have to change the display name by running a script. They are available on MS's site. Search for Display Names Change I think. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:49 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking Yes. They are displayed First Last. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking How are the names displayed in the list? FN LN - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:02 PM Subject: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking I have a question that has been stumping me for the past week. We just brought up our new Exchange 2000 server last weekend and I can't figure out why we can no longer type in a last name or part of a last name and have Outlook 2000 resolve it from the GAL. Exchange 5.5 would do this and many of us got used to it. Now the only way to get the correct name is to start from the beginning and work across (First Last). Has Exchange 2000 really gotten stupider? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking
I have a question that has been stumping me for the past week. We just brought up our new Exchange 2000 server last weekend and I can't figure out why we can no longer type in a last name or part of a last name and have Outlook 2000 resolve it from the GAL. Exchange 5.5 would do this and many of us got used to it. Now the only way to get the correct name is to start from the beginning and work across (First Last). Has Exchange 2000 really gotten stupider? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking
Yes. They are displayed First Last. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking How are the names displayed in the list? FN LN - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:02 PM Subject: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking I have a question that has been stumping me for the past week. We just brought up our new Exchange 2000 server last weekend and I can't figure out why we can no longer type in a last name or part of a last name and have Outlook 2000 resolve it from the GAL. Exchange 5.5 would do this and many of us got used to it. Now the only way to get the correct name is to start from the beginning and work across (First Last). Has Exchange 2000 really gotten stupider? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking
So, what you are saying is, I can only search in the order the names are displayed. Again I say, could Exchange 2000 be stupider than 5.5? In 5.5 we could search on any string of characters anywhere in the name and it would resolve Example to get Johan Sebastian Bach, I could simply type bast and, if no other names in the GAL had that string in them, it would resolve. Also, if it resolved multiple names from the string typed in, you would be prompted to chose from the list. This is the functionality I am looking for again. I can't believe that upgrading to Exchange 2000 will end up being a step backwards on this issue. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking You will have to change the display name by running a script. They are available on MS's site. Search for Display Names Change I think. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:49 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking Yes. They are displayed First Last. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking How are the names displayed in the list? FN LN - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:02 PM Subject: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking I have a question that has been stumping me for the past week. We just brought up our new Exchange 2000 server last weekend and I can't figure out why we can no longer type in a last name or part of a last name and have Outlook 2000 resolve it from the GAL. Exchange 5.5 would do this and many of us got used to it. Now the only way to get the correct name is to start from the beginning and work across (First Last). Has Exchange 2000 really gotten stupider? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking
Point taken. Maybe I can find an answer searching the Windows KB. I keep forgetting that Exchange is integrated into AD now. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking Don't blame in on Exchange, it's and AD problem. Exchange no longer owns user accounts. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:59 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking So, what you are saying is, I can only search in the order the names are displayed. Again I say, could Exchange 2000 be stupider than 5.5? In 5.5 we could search on any string of characters anywhere in the name and it would resolve Example to get Johan Sebastian Bach, I could simply type bast and, if no other names in the GAL had that string in them, it would resolve. Also, if it resolved multiple names from the string typed in, you would be prompted to chose from the list. This is the functionality I am looking for again. I can't believe that upgrading to Exchange 2000 will end up being a step backwards on this issue. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking You will have to change the display name by running a script. They are available on MS's site. Search for Display Names Change I think. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:49 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking Yes. They are displayed First Last. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking How are the names displayed in the list? FN LN - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:02 PM Subject: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking I have a question that has been stumping me for the past week. We just brought up our new Exchange 2000 server last weekend and I can't figure out why we can no longer type in a last name or part of a last name and have Outlook 2000 resolve it from the GAL. Exchange 5.5 would do this and many of us got used to it. Now the only way to get the correct name is to start from the beginning and work across (First Last). Has Exchange 2000 really gotten stupider? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Email Attachments Disappearing
Good guess. He is sending RTF. After I sent the message yesterday another search of Microsoft KB revealed article Q197066. Going to change to plain text and test this morning. Will update the list. Fresh out of Batman cookies. I do have this nice box of Microsoft Server Crunch cereal though. Thanks...Ray -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Attachments Disappearing Ooh! Ooh! I know this one! OL sending as RTF with the receiving clients being POP3 or IMAP4! Just a guess. We got any Batman cookies left? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Attachments Disappearing What format are the messages being sent in? Missy - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: John Drago [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:58 PM Subject: Email Attachments Disappearing I have a single user who is having a strange problem that has me completely stumped. This user will send out attachments to recipients outside our organization and 2 of the recipients either get no attachment or they are unable to open the attachment they receive. If his assistant sends the attachment all recipients receive the files with no problems. We found at one point that attachments arriving unopenable were getting to the user with the extension removed from the file which was part of the reason they couldn't open them. (example, sent FILE.DOC, recipient gets FILE and can't open). He has also had some success sending the same attachment to another person in the same organization without problems but that is inconsistent. We have verified that his mailbox seems to be normal and has the same configuration as other users. We made sure he had SP1 installed for Outlook and the latest version of IE (5.5 sp2). Our environment is: Exchange 5.5 sp3 Windows NT sp6a Outlook 2000 sp1 client I would appreciate any suggestions on this. Especially as the sender is our PR director and the recipients are CEO's and the Chairman of our Board. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Attachments Disappearing
I have a single user who is having a strange problem that has me completely stumped. This user will send out attachments to recipients outside our organization and 2 of the recipients either get no attachment or they are unable to open the attachment they receive. If his assistant sends the attachment all recipients receive the files with no problems. We found at one point that attachments arriving unopenable were getting to the user with the extension removed from the file which was part of the reason they couldn't open them. (example, sent FILE.DOC, recipient gets FILE and can't open). He has also had some success sending the same attachment to another person in the same organization without problems but that is inconsistent. We have verified that his mailbox seems to be normal and has the same configuration as other users. We made sure he had SP1 installed for Outlook and the latest version of IE (5.5 sp2). Our environment is: Exchange 5.5 sp3 Windows NT sp6a Outlook 2000 sp1 client I would appreciate any suggestions on this. Especially as the sender is our PR director and the recipients are CEO's and the Chairman of our Board. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
