RE: Adding OWA 2000 to a different web site (same server)
I was doing this on Friday for a client and it took me a couple of hours to work out. The way I did it was to create the site in Exchange System Manager, then create a new virtual directory for Exchange and Public. Then, once created and seen in Internet Services Manager, I went in to the properties for the new site, to "Home Directory" and changed the address from the BackofficeStorage address to the local directory I had an existing web site configured in. Finally to get IIS to serve the existing web pages correctly I removed "davex.dll" (IIRC) in the Application Configuration, being careful NOT to apply the changes to the child nodes by pressing "Cancel" when prompted. I don't think I missed anything, but let me know if I have. Simon. -- Simon Butler, MCP, MCSA Senior Systems Administrator Amset IT Solutions Ltd. e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: www.amset-it.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg S Sent: 05 January 2004 14:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Adding OWA 2000 to a different web site (same server) Are there any tricks for adding OWA to a new website on an existing IIS/Exchange 2000 server? I think i sort of have it working by creating the website from within Exchange administrator - but that set up OWA as the root of the web - ideally i'd like OWA to work from a virtual web /exchange as it does on the Default web server. Only docs i could find by searching MS Knowledge base were 5.5 specific - I need this to go on 2000 (Windows + Exchange 2000 - latest service packs and patches all around...)Also whatever I do, hoping it will work when i Upgrade to Exchange 2003 followed by Windows 2003 sometime this spring... Thanks Greg --- Greg Sachs [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
I didn't call Technical, I called sales to query my license, then they put me through to Customer Services. They read my license information from their computer and I was away. The reason they told me was that it was for a different version and I only could have it because I was under maintenance. I too thought it was odd that I required a different key, but that was what I was told. Simon. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ml.exchange Sent: 10 December 2003 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? I have not tried that yet as I dread waiting on hold for an hour for a tech (if you are forced to pay for support in the first place should you get to speak with a tech without being on hold that long?). I guess that may be my next step but I have no idea why I would need a new key for it other than a weird bung on their end. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Butler Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Have you got an upgraded key from Veritas? I had this same problem with a new Exchange installation a couple of weeks ago. Putting the existing key for Exchange gave me the mailboxes but didn't give me the Information stores option. A quick call to Veritas customer support got me a new key and the options were available. Simon. -- Simon Butler, MCP, MCSA Amset IT Solutions Ltd. e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: www.amset-it.com w: www.amset.info -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ml.exchange Sent: 09 December 2003 23:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1 on. The exchange agent is also installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=
RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
Have you got an upgraded key from Veritas? I had this same problem with a new Exchange installation a couple of weeks ago. Putting the existing key for Exchange gave me the mailboxes but didn't give me the Information stores option. A quick call to Veritas customer support got me a new key and the options were available. Simon. -- Simon Butler, MCP, MCSA Amset IT Solutions Ltd. e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: www.amset-it.com w: www.amset.info -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ml.exchange Sent: 09 December 2003 23:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Yes, Exchange Admin and System Manager from Exchange 2003 are on both of my production backup servers AND on the Exchange 2003 server I installed BE 9.1 on. The exchange agent is also installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems? Scott -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores? We are currently running a Ex 5.5 mixed mode environment with our First Exchange 2003 server deployed for testing with our IT department. For the life of me I can not get Backup Exec 9.0 4454 (with E2k3 hot fix) or 9.1 to see and backup the private and public info stores. It WILL see and backup the mailboxes and public folders just fine in bricks mode (not that I want to). It gives me no errors, but just does not show the IS as an available item to backup. I have tried this with two different backup servers, and by installing BE 9.1 on to the new Exchange server by its self. I have even created a new account for it to use to login with. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'd like to rule out something stupid if I can before I spend an hour on hold with Veritas. Thanks Miles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=en glish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K #2
View - Advanced features Simon Butler Merrill Lynch HSBC -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K #2 GREAT, thank you! Now if am missing that TAb in AD U&C but have the other three Xchange tabs any suggestions? - Original Message - From: "Robert Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:19 AM Subject: RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K > Exchange advanced tab on object in AD U&C's, mailbox permissions > button. > > Regards, > > Rob Ellis > Messaging Consultant > Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes > IBM Global Services > DDI: 01256 752845 > Mobile: 07974 111867 > Fax: 01256 754899 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K > > I did put that question forward fairly poorly, let me start again . . > . . I need to allow multiple AD accounts have access to one mailbox on Exchange > 2K. Sp1. > How do I do this? > > =John Q > > - Original Message - > From: "Robert Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:12 AM > Subject: RE: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K > > > I'm not sure exactly what you have in mind. But to view the > permissions on a mailbox, you go into AD Users and Computers. Then you > open up the individual in question, click on the Exchange Advanced > tab, then click the Mailbox Rights button. > > Rob > > -Original Message- > From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K > > > How do I manage individual mailboxes in E2K? I see no permissions on > each mailbox only the IS. > Just migrated from 5.5 to 2K and forgot to read all of the > Administrating > part of the manual, I am reading but any help is appreciated. > > Thanks as always, > -John Q > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the > personal attention > of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended > addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is > unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the > message. Any > representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. > > ntl Group Limited > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as their content could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of its internet transmission. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
RE: Mailbox
Are you sure you limits are set correctly,...they're in Kb not Mb... Simon Butler Merrill Lynch HSBC -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox OL98 or higher? If yes, then right click on the "Mailbox - Joe EndUser" folder and go to properties, then click "folder size". What does it say? My guess would be "Sent Items", "Deleted Items" or "Journal" are where you will find the most items. 32K or 32000K? 32K seems a little small. -- Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 >>>-Original Message- >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:08 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: Mailbox >>> >>> >>>THere are a few users here that get the error that they are >>>exceeding their limit on the server, but they only have nine >>>items in their mailbox. The mailbox limit used here is 32k. >>>I looked on the server and it says that they have 34k, but >>>their are only 9 items in thier mailbox which is 3k. any suggestions >>> >>>thanks >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as their content could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of its internet transmission. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by any entity or office through which this message has been sent unless otherwise clearly indicated in this message and the authority of the author to so bind Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited or any other company within its group is duly verified. Any email may be monitored in accordance with Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited's communication policy. Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited Registered Office 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ. Registered in England Number 3973777 Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited regulated by the FSA ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE
Me here, Back from pub, Waiting to play footy (soccer) Simon Butler Merrill Lynch HSBC -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE There's this holiday, that most of us have off, Richard... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -- Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WHERE IS EVERYONE Anyone out there? Wakie Wakie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as their content could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of its internet transmission. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by any entity or office through which this message has been sent unless otherwise clearly indicated in this message and the authority of the author to so bind Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited or any other company within its group is duly verified. Any email may be monitored in accordance with Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited's communication policy. Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited Registered Office 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ. Registered in England Number 3973777 Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited regulated by the FSA ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
Anyone know what the going rate is for an Oracle Mail Systems Architect? Guess its not much of a job,..."Based on current growth trends my design for messaging with acme co. requires the use of 1 server..." Any exams to take? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! Where do I sign up? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:29 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! > > > But Roger, for your $80,000 you get: a system that has never, > ever crashed > and never will; the most secure server in the world, it's > never been hacked > or infected by a virus; and a machine autographed picture of > Larry shaking > hands with Elvis Smitticamp. > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! > > > From http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6276284.html > > "But after Thursday's price changes, the enterprise edition of the 9i > database will cost a uniform $40,000 per processor, while the standard > edition will cost $15,000 per processor. In the next few days, Oracle > will release to existing customers a plan to convert to the new > pricing scheme, > Ellison said." > > WOW... For my dual processor Exchange box, thats $80,000... > Just for the > friggin database that hosts it! > > Exchange 5.5 Enterprise cost me what, about $3000? > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT > Senior Systems Administrator > Peregrine Systems > Atlanta, GA > http://www.peregrine.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:47 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! > > > > > > I've requested pricing for my 30 users I'm really interested to > > see how much money I save over my current implementation. I wanna > > ride the Oracle > > wave baby! Screw Microsoft. > > > > Chris > > -- > > Chris Scharff > > Senior Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:17 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! > > > > > > > > > > > > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m > > > icrosoft_s_e-m > > > ail_crown_1.html > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as their content could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of its internet transmission. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use
RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
mud fight,... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 November 2001 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? Cat Fight! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Cameron Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list?? oh, pul-leeze. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as their content could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of its internet transmission. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by any entity or office through which this message has been sent unless otherwise clearly indicated in this message and the authority of the author to so bind Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited or any other company within its group is duly verified. Any email may be monitored in accordance with Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited's communication policy. Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited Registered Office 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ. Registered in England Number 3973777 Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited regulated by the SFA ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
