RE: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem

2003-01-08 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B
Here are some instructions I wrote that we posted for our users (you need to
add the Outlook.txt file).  There is also a separate article, Q197415, that
tells you how to update shared calendars in Public Folders.


1.  Save this file to the following location on your PC (right click on the
file and choose Save As):

c:\program files\microsoft office\office\1033

 
NOTE:  Click YES if you receive the message The file OUTLOOK.TXT already
exists.  Do you want to replace the existing file?

2.  From your Inbox, click on the menu bar and choose Tools, Options,
Calendar Options, Add Holidays.

3.  Click on the Calendar Options... button

4.  Click on the Add Holidays... button

5.  Check the boxes for the holidays in the countries you want added to your
calendar.  Click OK.

This will add holidays from 2003-2006.

**THIS IS ONLY FOR YOUR PERSONAL CALENDARS, NOT FOR SHARED CALENDARS IN
PUBLIC FOLDERS***

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem


This message was sent back in mid December, but I thought I send another
email with updated info about Outlook 2000 Holiday patch from Microsoft.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7d4d9017-8d4e-4
963-8ba7-d2e91d491f5eDisplayLang=en

Above patch will add Holidays 'till 2007 to Outlook 2000 clients.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem


Find your outlook.txt file and manually add the missing holidays. Then,
go back to outlook and re-add holidays.

-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem


Hi,

When any of our users add holidays in Outlook 2000, it adds them just
fine for 2002 but not 2003. It's like they aren't reoccurring. We are
running Exchange 2000 and have about 750 users. I have tried changing
the computer clock to 2003 and then adding holidays but they still only
populate 2002. I can't seem to find any KB articles on this. Has anyone
seen this behavior?

Thanks,

Aaron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VBS_SLUG.B

2002-12-03 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B
Trend just released a new pattern file (401) in response to false positives
of this virus.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VBS_SLUG.B


Seems to be a variant of Kournikova - see
http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/lists/slug/2001/February/msg00605.html

Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium 

-Original Message-
From: Dave Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 December 2002 14:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: VBS_SLUG.B


And Symantec only has

http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/dyn/33762.html



David Morrow
Network Administrator
Autodata Solutions Company
Ph: (519) 951-6067 Fax: (519) 451-6615
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Poor planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part.

This message has originated from Autodata Solutions Company.  The attached
material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata
Solutions Company. This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: December 3, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: VBS_SLUG.B



Goood Morning All,

I got to work today and had about ten emails from my server stating that 10
users had a virus called VBS_SLUG.B on thier pcs. All of these viruses are
in the same folder and same file.  This is one of the messages that i
recieved, 

Virus Alert!!
VBS_SLUG.B is detected on KAREN() in Logistics domain.
Infected file: C:\Program Files\folder.htt
Detection date: 2002.12.03 06:20:22
Action: Clean Failed (Quarantine Failed)

I went to Trend.com to search more information and didnt find an exact match
on this virus.  I also called trend and they said they didnt have any info
on this virus and that i should send them the virus asap.  I told them that
I couldnt cause i deleted the files that were Quarantined on the server.  So
how does trend not know anything about a virus that was detected by their
program (office scan).  Has anyone seen this virus before.  I also scanned
all the computers that were suppose to be infected and recieved no
notifications of them being infected.

RGDS
RICH

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Free/Busy Question

2002-10-02 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B

Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4.

Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server.  If he
sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information
that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will
it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward?  

Thank you,

Harold Waisel
FleetBoston

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Free/Busy Question

2002-10-02 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B

I was only concerned with the info up on the server.  And you are correct in
that I do want it to wipe out everything on the server.  Since, by default,
two months of info is posted, I was wondering if he'd have to deal with it
for the next 60 days.

Thanks,

Harold

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question


If he stops publishing his free/busy info, it's not going to wipe out his
Calendar, if that's what your worried about.

With that in mind, who cares if it wipes out all of his free/busy
information past/present/future?  Sounds like that's what he wants anyway.

-Original Message-
From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Free/Busy Question


Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4.

Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server.  If he
sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information
that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will
it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward?  

Thank you,

Harold Waisel
FleetBoston

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



E2K Backups and Service Packs

2002-09-06 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B

This is an interesting situation we just encountered that I thought others
would be interested in. 

In our test environment, we recently upgraded one of the E2K servers to SP3.
Afterwards, for various reasons, we needed to go back to an SP2 version of
the database, so we tried to restore the older databases, but were getting
JET errors.  After talking with Microsoft, we found out that once an
Exchange Server is upgraded to a newer service pack, you cannot recover an
older-version database using the later-version Exchange server.  This
applies to 3rd party backup software, as well as native Win2K backups.

This means that if, for compliance or business reasons, you need to keep
older versions of your databases archived, you need to know which version of
the software that database last ran under.  In addition you would need to
make sure that when you restore, you must do so on a server that is patched
only to that level of Service Pack.  Apparently this applies to the Private
IS only, and not Public IS.  Once you mount the older-version database on
its corresponding server, you can then dismount it and move it to a newer
version server so that you can use it (if necessary).

If you have any other information about this, I'd be interested in reading
your responses.

Harold Waisel
FleetBoston
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Store.exe - 100% CPU utilisation

2002-02-07 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B

Check the following articles for possible hints:

Q172813, Q159297, Q159176

Might also check SP4 fix list for Exchange 5.5

-Original Message-
From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Store.exe - 100% CPU utilisation


We have exchange 5.5 SP3 on a Nt4 SP6a server and have just finished doing
isinteg fix on the priv database which was corrupt. There are no errors left
and have done isinteg - patch

When we put the server back online, the cpu utilisation by store.exe = 100%.
This only happens when the IMC service is started, when the IS is started,
the cpu utilisation is ok, but when the IMC is switched on, the cpu util
jumps to 100%

Would appreciate any help on this

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server

2002-02-06 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B

Has anyone installed the BES 2.1 Service Pack 2 for Exchange, and did you
have any problems?

Thank you,

Harold B Waisel
Messaging and Collaborative Computing
FleetBoston Financial 
617.434.4201 (w) 
617.790.1253 (f) 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



SPAM Deletion

2002-01-17 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B

We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely,
that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue.  There are approximately
25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages.  Are there
any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon
author or subject to delete them from the queues.  Otherwise, it will be a
pretty long morning cleaning this up.  In the meantime, we've been able to
stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway.

Thanks,

Harold Waisel
FleetBoston

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SPAM Deletion

2002-01-17 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B

Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4

-Original Message-
From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SPAM Deletion


We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely,
that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue.  There are approximately
25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages.  Are there
any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon
author or subject to delete them from the queues.  Otherwise, it will be a
pretty long morning cleaning this up.  In the meantime, we've been able to
stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway.

Thanks,

Harold Waisel
FleetBoston

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Read-only mailbox

2001-11-13 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B

Is it possible to give a person a read-only mailbox?  We have a business
unit who'd like to be able to send notifications to people, but not allow
them to send anything out.  We don't have OWA, so I don't believe Anonymous
access to a public folder can apply.  I suggested using a web page for
announcements, but I was asked to follow up on this first.

I tried setting the Outgoing Message size limit to 0 kb on the Limits tab
in Exch Admin, but that didn't seem to work.  I was still able to send a
message.

Exchange 5.5, SP4
Outlook 2000

Thanks,

Harold B Waisel
Messaging and Collaborative Computing
FleetBoston Financial 
617.434.4201 (w) 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Read-only mailbox

2001-11-13 Thread WAISEL, HAROLD B

But I'll still need to create a mailbox for the person to give him access to
the PF... right?

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Read-only mailbox


set up a public folder, give the user read-only rights to the public folder.

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
Drug tests have no place in American society. The tests invade the privacy
of
the innocent and are easily evaded by the malcontent. They are a waste of
time
and money and are an insult to liberty. -- Dean Webb

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WAISEL, HAROLD B
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Read-only mailbox


Is it possible to give a person a read-only mailbox?  We have a business
unit who'd like to be able to send notifications to people, but not allow
them to send anything out.  We don't have OWA, so I don't believe Anonymous
access to a public folder can apply.  I suggested using a web page for
announcements, but I was asked to follow up on this first.

I tried setting the Outgoing Message size limit to 0 kb on the Limits tab
in Exch Admin, but that didn't seem to work.  I was still able to send a
message.

Exchange 5.5, SP4
Outlook 2000

Thanks,

Harold B Waisel
Messaging and Collaborative Computing
FleetBoston Financial
617.434.4201 (w)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]