New KB: Windows XP-Based Clients Do Not Receive "New Mail" Notification Messages After You Install Service Pack 1
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q815052 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA new mail notification
That's the first thing I did, it was 6.0. In checking further, I think my 'Plus Pack' install from Messageware may have had something to do with it. I'll advise if I track it down. David -Original Message- From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA new mail notification New mail is only available on IE 5.5 and higher. Verify the IE version of the client. Mark http://www.messageware.net - Plus Pack for OWA 2000 (Spell, Thes, Addressing, etc) - SecureLogoff for OWA 2000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA new mail notification I have one remote OWA user who complains after upgrading to Exch2K SP3 that they no longer get new mail notification. I've been thru Technet and slipstick.com, with nothing standing out on that issue. Anyone seen that? David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA new mail notification
New mail is only available on IE 5.5 and higher. Verify the IE version of the client. Mark http://www.messageware.net - Plus Pack for OWA 2000 (Spell, Thes, Addressing, etc) - SecureLogoff for OWA 2000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA new mail notification I have one remote OWA user who complains after upgrading to Exch2K SP3 that they no longer get new mail notification. I've been thru Technet and slipstick.com, with nothing standing out on that issue. Anyone seen that? David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification
As as 10 seconds from now, I have. > -Original Message- > From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification > > > There's no way to do this without rewriting code. Good > request, though. > Have you tried sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Levis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM > Subject: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification > > > Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1. > > When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up > that new-mail > notification icon. > > However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- > are delivered to > a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification. > > Without re-writing butt-loads of MS's code, anyone know a way > to change the > behaviour such a new message in any folder results in Notification? > > Thanks! > > > > > Chris Levis > Applied Geographics, Inc. > Boston, MA > > Don't go where the path leads you. > Instead go where there is no path and leave trails. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification
There's no way to do this without rewriting code. Good request, though. Have you tried sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Missy - Original Message - From: "Chris Levis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1. When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up that new-mail notification icon. However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- are delivered to a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification. Without re-writing butt-loads of MS's code, anyone know a way to change the behaviour such a new message in any folder results in Notification? Thanks! Chris Levis Applied Geographics, Inc. Boston, MA Don't go where the path leads you. Instead go where there is no path and leave trails. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch2000 OWA new mail notification
Exchange 2000 SP3. OWA clients are IE6, SP1. When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up that new-mail notification icon. However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- are delivered to a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification. Without re-writing butt-loads of MS's code, anyone know a way to change the behaviour such a new message in any folder results in Notification? Thanks! Chris Levis Applied Geographics, Inc. Boston, MA Don't go where the path leads you. Instead go where there is no path and leave trails. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new mail notification (FIX)
Hey Chris, Remember when I wrote to you about an issue that I had, and you diagnosed it as a UDP problem over a firewall, and gave me an article about "new mail notification"? Well I finally got the Q article. Q264035 Thanks for all your help, you al are a GREAT resource -John Q - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:32 PM Subject: RE: fix monitor Silly girl, that's what the x-face mail header is for. (really) -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: fix monitor > > > > I still do some exchange administration... and I answer > questions here and > that other list as well. So, it is still work. You just > wanted to place a > face with the email. > ~ > -K.Borndale > Network Administrator > Sybari Software > 631.630.8569 -direct dial > 631.439.0689 -fax > http://www.sybari.com > "One man's ceiling is another man's floor" _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New mail notification
Multiple NICs in the Exchange box? Are you sniffing for the packets somewhere where you can definitively say the Exchange server is not sending the packets? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: Steve Van Eck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: New mail notification > > > Recently, the client machines at my WAN sites stopped > receiving new mail notifications. I have a sniffer on my > exchange box and conducted two packet captures. The first is > between exchange and a local machine. Outlook > is open when the capture is started, and a new piece of mail > is sent to the > clients mailbox. The first two packets seen are UDP and sent > from Exchange > to the client machine, notifying it of the new mail. The > second capture is > between Exchange and a client on the WAN. Following the same > procedure, it > appears that no UDP packets are sent to that client machine. > Any ideas why > the Exchange machine is not sending these packets out? > We are using Exchange 5.5 with Outlook 2000. The sites are > connected via frame relay. There is no NAT taking place and > the routers have no filters > set on them. > Thanks > > > _ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New mail notification
Recently, the client machines at my WAN sites stopped receiving new mail notifications. I have a sniffer on my exchange box and conducted two packet captures. The first is between exchange and a local machine. Outlook is open when the capture is started, and a new piece of mail is sent to the clients mailbox. The first two packets seen are UDP and sent from Exchange to the client machine, notifying it of the new mail. The second capture is between Exchange and a client on the WAN. Following the same procedure, it appears that no UDP packets are sent to that client machine. Any ideas why the Exchange machine is not sending these packets out? We are using Exchange 5.5 with Outlook 2000. The sites are connected via frame relay. There is no NAT taking place and the routers have no filters set on them. Thanks _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Mail Notification
Nauseam (not "nauseum") is the accusative of nausea, so the plural of nauseum is nauseas. First declinsion: a ae ae am a ae arum is as is More than you wanted to know, Tom? No, I didn't go to Catholic school. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Mail Notification
Could be nic as well. > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > > Still the router. It has an ACL that only permits UDP from > the current server's IP address. > > Roger > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT > Senior Systems Administrator > Peregrine Systems > Atlanta, GA > http://www.peregrine.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jerry Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:44 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > > > > > Thanks for the help - especially the Latin lesson. But, since > > there had been > > no changes to the router, I decided to test by moving one > > mailbox back to > > the original server. Sent a test message and the notification > > popped right > > up. The "new" server is an HP E800 w/mirrored drives and a > > gig of ram. Is > > there something in the configuration of exchange that could > > be causing this? > > Is it something about Ex5.5 on W2k? Both servers on on the > > same segment, go > > through the same routers, hub, switches etc. > > > > Thanks Again > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Bueffel, Scott M - CNF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > >Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:23:53 -0800 > > > > > >Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM > > >To: Exchange Discussions > > >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > > > > > > > >Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of > "nauseum" is? > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM > > >Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > > >Conversation: New Mail Notification > > >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > > > > > > > >The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM > > >To: Exchange Discussions > > >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > > > > > > > >This has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. Search the > > archives on > > >this > > >because it has to do with UDP packets being sent from the > > server to the > > >client. > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: JConway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:10 AM > > >To: Exchange Discussions > > >Subject: New Mail Notification > > > > > > > > >Hi Everyone, > > > > > >2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both > > Ex5.5 sp4. CLients > > >are OL2000 > > > > > >I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in > > the Exchange > > >Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer > (W2k) machine > > >without any problems, beyond having to once or twice > recreate a users > > >profile. Earlier this week, I moved about 10 mailboxes, all > > belonging to > > >the > > >users in a remote office. At that time, they stopped > > receiving notified of > > >the arrival of new mail. To see new mail, they have to do > > something to > > >refresh OL - select another folder, close and reopen etc. > > Yesterday I had > > >four of them delete and recreate new profiles. After that, > > two of them > > >started to get notifications, but two didn't. As of this > > morning, one of > > >the > > >users thet was working correctly yesterday, is failing > again. From my > > >machine (I'm in the Main office) I can logon to her > mailbox, send a > > >message, and get notified of its' arrival. So, I don
RE: New Mail Notification
Still the router. It has an ACL that only permits UDP from the current server's IP address. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > From: Jerry Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > > Thanks for the help - especially the Latin lesson. But, since > there had been > no changes to the router, I decided to test by moving one > mailbox back to > the original server. Sent a test message and the notification > popped right > up. The "new" server is an HP E800 w/mirrored drives and a > gig of ram. Is > there something in the configuration of exchange that could > be causing this? > Is it something about Ex5.5 on W2k? Both servers on on the > same segment, go > through the same routers, hub, switches etc. > > Thanks Again > > > > > > > >From: "Bueffel, Scott M - CNF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > >Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:23:53 -0800 > > > >Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM > >To: Exchange Discussions > >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > > > > >Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is? > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM > >Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > >Conversation: New Mail Notification > >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > > > > >The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM > >To: Exchange Discussions > >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > > > > >This has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. Search the > archives on > >this > >because it has to do with UDP packets being sent from the > server to the > >client. > > > >-Original Message- > >From: JConway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:10 AM > >To: Exchange Discussions > >Subject: New Mail Notification > > > > > >Hi Everyone, > > > >2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both > Ex5.5 sp4. CLients > >are OL2000 > > > >I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in > the Exchange > >Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine > >without any problems, beyond having to once or twice recreate a users > >profile. Earlier this week, I moved about 10 mailboxes, all > belonging to > >the > >users in a remote office. At that time, they stopped > receiving notified of > >the arrival of new mail. To see new mail, they have to do > something to > >refresh OL - select another folder, close and reopen etc. > Yesterday I had > >four of them delete and recreate new profiles. After that, > two of them > >started to get notifications, but two didn't. As of this > morning, one of > >the > >users thet was working correctly yesterday, is failing again. From my > >machine (I'm in the Main office) I can logon to her mailbox, send a > >message, > >and get notified of its' arrival. So, I don't think it has > anything to do > >with a server function. Looking in the Registry, thought I > might find some > >profile info that isn't deleted when you remove a proflie. > But it looks > >like > >that is all kept in one location - > >Hkey_Users/Default/Software/Microsoft/WindowsMessagingSubsyst > em/Profiles > >, > >with each profile in its' own folder. And that gets deleted > along with the > >profile. Oh yeah, the branch office is connected over a > Frame relay and no > >changes made to anything on that side recently. It looks > like a client-side > >issue, but I'm missing something. I appreciate would any help. > > > >Thanks, > >Jerry > > > >__
RE: New Mail Notification
Thanks for the help - especially the Latin lesson. But, since there had been no changes to the router, I decided to test by moving one mailbox back to the original server. Sent a test message and the notification popped right up. The "new" server is an HP E800 w/mirrored drives and a gig of ram. Is there something in the configuration of exchange that could be causing this? Is it something about Ex5.5 on W2k? Both servers on on the same segment, go through the same routers, hub, switches etc. Thanks Again >From: "Bueffel, Scott M - CNF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification >Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:23:53 -0800 > >Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam > >-Original Message- >From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > >Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is? > >-Original Message- >From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM >Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List >Conversation: New Mail Notification >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > >The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm > > > >-Original Message- >From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: New Mail Notification > > >This has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. Search the archives on >this >because it has to do with UDP packets being sent from the server to the >client. > >-Original Message- >From: JConway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:10 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: New Mail Notification > > >Hi Everyone, > >2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients >are OL2000 > >I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange >Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine >without any problems, beyond having to once or twice recreate a users >profile. Earlier this week, I moved about 10 mailboxes, all belonging to >the >users in a remote office. At that time, they stopped receiving notified of >the arrival of new mail. To see new mail, they have to do something to >refresh OL - select another folder, close and reopen etc. Yesterday I had >four of them delete and recreate new profiles. After that, two of them >started to get notifications, but two didn't. As of this morning, one of >the >users thet was working correctly yesterday, is failing again. From my >machine (I'm in the Main office) I can logon to her mailbox, send a >message, >and get notified of its' arrival. So, I don't think it has anything to do >with a server function. Looking in the Registry, thought I might find some >profile info that isn't deleted when you remove a proflie. But it looks >like >that is all kept in one location - >Hkey_Users/Default/Software/Microsoft/WindowsMessagingSubsystem/Profiles >, >with each profile in its' own folder. And that gets deleted along with the >profile. Oh yeah, the branch office is connected over a Frame relay and no >changes made to anything on that side recently. It looks like a client-side >issue, but I'm missing something. I appreciate would any help. > >Thanks, >Jerry > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com
RE: New Mail Notification
Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New Mail Notification Subject: RE: New Mail Notification The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification This has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. Search the archives on this because it has to do with UDP packets being sent from the server to the client. -Original Message- From: JConway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Mail Notification Hi Everyone, 2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients are OL2000 I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine without any problems, beyond having to once or twice recreate a users profile. Earlier this week, I moved about 10 mailboxes, all belonging to the users in a remote office. At that time, they stopped receiving notified of the arrival of new mail. To see new mail, they have to do something to refresh OL - select another folder, close and reopen etc. Yesterday I had four of them delete and recreate new profiles. After that, two of them started to get notifications, but two didn't. As of this morning, one of the users thet was working correctly yesterday, is failing again. From my machine (I'm in the Main office) I can logon to her mailbox, send a message, and get notified of its' arrival. So, I don't think it has anything to do with a server function. Looking in the Registry, thought I might find some profile info that isn't deleted when you remove a proflie. But it looks like that is all kept in one location - Hkey_Users/Default/Software/Microsoft/WindowsMessagingSubsystem/Profiles , with each profile in its' own folder. And that gets deleted along with the profile. Oh yeah, the branch office is connected over a Frame relay and no changes made to anything on that side recently. It looks like a client-side issue, but I'm missing something. I appreciate would any help. Thanks, Jerry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Mail Notification
I think its "Nixon" -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New Mail Notification Subject: RE: New Mail Notification The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification This has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. Search the archives on this because it has to do with UDP packets being sent from the server to the client. -Original Message- From: JConway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Mail Notification Hi Everyone, 2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients are OL2000 I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine without any problems, beyond having to once or twice recreate a users profile. Earlier this week, I moved about 10 mailboxes, all belonging to the users in a remote office. At that time, they stopped receiving notified of the arrival of new mail. To see new mail, they have to do something to refresh OL - select another folder, close and reopen etc. Yesterday I had four of them delete and recreate new profiles. After that, two of them started to get notifications, but two didn't. As of this morning, one of the users thet was working correctly yesterday, is failing again. From my machine (I'm in the Main office) I can logon to her mailbox, send a message, and get notified of its' arrival. So, I don't think it has anything to do with a server function. Looking in the Registry, thought I might find some profile info that isn't deleted when you remove a proflie. But it looks like that is all kept in one location - Hkey_Users/Default/Software/Microsoft/WindowsMessagingSubsystem/Profiles , with each profile in its' own folder. And that gets deleted along with the profile. Oh yeah, the branch office is connected over a Frame relay and no changes made to anything on that side recently. It looks like a client-side issue, but I'm missing something. I appreciate would any help. Thanks, Jerry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Mail Notification
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of "nauseum" is? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New Mail Notification Subject: RE: New Mail Notification The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification This has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. Search the archives on this because it has to do with UDP packets being sent from the server to the client. -Original Message- From: JConway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Mail Notification Hi Everyone, 2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients are OL2000 I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine without any problems, beyond having to once or twice recreate a users profile. Earlier this week, I moved about 10 mailboxes, all belonging to the users in a remote office. At that time, they stopped receiving notified of the arrival of new mail. To see new mail, they have to do something to refresh OL - select another folder, close and reopen etc. Yesterday I had four of them delete and recreate new profiles. After that, two of them started to get notifications, but two didn't. As of this morning, one of the users thet was working correctly yesterday, is failing again. From my machine (I'm in the Main office) I can logon to her mailbox, send a message, and get notified of its' arrival. So, I don't think it has anything to do with a server function. Looking in the Registry, thought I might find some profile info that isn't deleted when you remove a proflie. But it looks like that is all kept in one location - Hkey_Users/Default/Software/Microsoft/WindowsMessagingSubsystem/Profiles , with each profile in its' own folder. And that gets deleted along with the profile. Oh yeah, the branch office is connected over a Frame relay and no changes made to anything on that side recently. It looks like a client-side issue, but I'm missing something. I appreciate would any help. Thanks, Jerry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Mail Notification
The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification This has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. Search the archives on this because it has to do with UDP packets being sent from the server to the client. -Original Message- From: JConway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Mail Notification Hi Everyone, 2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients are OL2000 I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine without any problems, beyond having to once or twice recreate a users profile. Earlier this week, I moved about 10 mailboxes, all belonging to the users in a remote office. At that time, they stopped receiving notified of the arrival of new mail. To see new mail, they have to do something to refresh OL - select another folder, close and reopen etc. Yesterday I had four of them delete and recreate new profiles. After that, two of them started to get notifications, but two didn't. As of this morning, one of the users thet was working correctly yesterday, is failing again. From my machine (I'm in the Main office) I can logon to her mailbox, send a message, and get notified of its' arrival. So, I don't think it has anything to do with a server function. Looking in the Registry, thought I might find some profile info that isn't deleted when you remove a proflie. But it looks like that is all kept in one location - Hkey_Users/Default/Software/Microsoft/WindowsMessagingSubsystem/Profiles, with each profile in its' own folder. And that gets deleted along with the profile. Oh yeah, the branch office is connected over a Frame relay and no changes made to anything on that side recently. It looks like a client-side issue, but I'm missing something. I appreciate would any help. Thanks, Jerry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Mail Notification
This has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. Search the archives on this because it has to do with UDP packets being sent from the server to the client. -Original Message- From: JConway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Mail Notification Hi Everyone, 2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients are OL2000 I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine without any problems, beyond having to once or twice recreate a users profile. Earlier this week, I moved about 10 mailboxes, all belonging to the users in a remote office. At that time, they stopped receiving notified of the arrival of new mail. To see new mail, they have to do something to refresh OL - select another folder, close and reopen etc. Yesterday I had four of them delete and recreate new profiles. After that, two of them started to get notifications, but two didn't. As of this morning, one of the users thet was working correctly yesterday, is failing again. From my machine (I'm in the Main office) I can logon to her mailbox, send a message, and get notified of its' arrival. So, I don't think it has anything to do with a server function. Looking in the Registry, thought I might find some profile info that isn't deleted when you remove a proflie. But it looks like that is all kept in one location - Hkey_Users/Default/Software/Microsoft/WindowsMessagingSubsystem/Profiles, with each profile in its' own folder. And that gets deleted along with the profile. Oh yeah, the branch office is connected over a Frame relay and no changes made to anything on that side recently. It looks like a client-side issue, but I'm missing something. I appreciate would any help. Thanks, Jerry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Mail Notification
Hi Everyone, 2 servers (one NT4 sp6a, one W2k sp2)in same site, both Ex5.5 sp4. CLients are OL2000 I have been moving mailboxes (using the Move Mailbox tool in the Exchange Admin program) from the older (NT4) server to the newer (W2k) machine without any problems, beyond having to once or twice recreate a users profile. Earlier this week, I moved about 10 mailboxes, all belonging to the users in a remote office. At that time, they stopped receiving notified of the arrival of new mail. To see new mail, they have to do something to refresh OL - select another folder, close and reopen etc. Yesterday I had four of them delete and recreate new profiles. After that, two of them started to get notifications, but two didn't. As of this morning, one of the users thet was working correctly yesterday, is failing again. From my machine (I'm in the Main office) I can logon to her mailbox, send a message, and get notified of its' arrival. So, I don't think it has anything to do with a server function. Looking in the Registry, thought I might find some profile info that isn't deleted when you remove a proflie. But it looks like that is all kept in one location - Hkey_Users/Default/Software/Microsoft/WindowsMessagingSubsystem/Profiles, with each profile in its' own folder. And that gets deleted along with the profile. Oh yeah, the branch office is connected over a Frame relay and no changes made to anything on that side recently. It looks like a client-side issue, but I'm missing something. I appreciate would any help. Thanks, Jerry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New mail notification port(s)
I can get new mail notifications over a Cisco VPN without problems. Are you filtering the VPN traffic? If so allow outbound UDP from your Exchange server. regards, Richard Dann -Original Message- From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 August 2001 04:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s) Um, no. There's no new mail notify over our Cisco VPN system, but we have another legacy system that allows those packets through. I'm trying to do research so my network guys have something to work with. Kevin - Original Message - From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:31 PM Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s) > Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least > host some Exchange services... > > It's completely random, from what MS has said in the past. And there's no > way to un-randomize it, and it can't be changed. Apparently the three lines > (whatever) of code that control this were too hard to rewrite for E2K too... > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:24 PM > Subject: New mail notification port(s) > > > Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail > notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and > 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is > there something else to it? > > Kevin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nextra is the trading name of CIX (Compulink Information Exchange), Norsk Data and XTML, all of whom are part of the Nextra Group. Nextra, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For information on products and services click on www.nextra.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New mail notification port(s)
Kevin, As I understand it the port is picked by the client, rather like source ports, so you'll probably get the next available. If you want to put notifications through a firewall, it would be best to use a VPN. regards, Richard Dann -Original Message- From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 August 2001 00:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New mail notification port(s) Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is there something else to it? Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nextra is the trading name of CIX (Compulink Information Exchange), Norsk Data and XTML, all of whom are part of the Nextra Group. Nextra, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For information on products and services click on www.nextra.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New mail notification port(s)
That's an easy explaination. And you won't be able to fix it. When Outlook connects to the Exchange server, it registers its local IP address as the destination for new mail notifications. The Cisco 3000 series (formerly Altiga) clients install a network shim (deterministic network enhancer) that hooks the lower end of the IP stack, and intercepts packets destined for the networks specified in the concentrator. The client side IP stack doesn't know of the IP address assigned to your tunnel. The MS PPTP client, on the other hand, changes your local IP address to be the one assigned as part of the tunnel, so Outlook sees the tunnel address and registers that to Exchange for notifications. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Network Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s) > > > Um, no. > > There's no new mail notify over our Cisco VPN system, but we > have another > legacy system that allows those packets through. I'm trying > to do research > so my network guys have something to work with. > > Kevin > > - Original Message - > From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:31 PM > Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s) > > > > Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that > wants to at least > > host some Exchange services... > > > > It's completely random, from what MS has said in the past. > And there's no > > way to un-randomize it, and it can't be changed. > Apparently the three > lines > > (whatever) of code that control this were too hard to > rewrite for E2K > too... > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:24 PM > > Subject: New mail notification port(s) > > > > > > Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail > > notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere > between 1024 and > > 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from > what's unused, or > is > > there something else to it? > > > > Kevin > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New mail notification port(s)
Picked randomly by the client. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:24 PM Subject: New mail notification port(s) > Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail > notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and > 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is > there something else to it? > > Kevin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New mail notification port(s)
Exchange uses UDP for new mail notifications which most routers have blocked by default. (psst: read the FAQ) - Original Message - From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:58 PM Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s) > Um, no. > > There's no new mail notify over our Cisco VPN system, but we have another > legacy system that allows those packets through. I'm trying to do research > so my network guys have something to work with. > > Kevin > > - Original Message - > From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:31 PM > Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s) > > > > Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least > > host some Exchange services... > > > > It's completely random, from what MS has said in the past. And there's no > > way to un-randomize it, and it can't be changed. Apparently the three > lines > > (whatever) of code that control this were too hard to rewrite for E2K > too... > > > > Missy > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:24 PM > > Subject: New mail notification port(s) > > > > > > Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail > > notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and > > 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or > is > > there something else to it? > > > > Kevin > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New mail notification port(s)
It has more to do with the client side than the server side. The range on the client can be closed down but one then runs the risk of causing other services to fail. This is nothing new. Open an ftp connection to a server somewhere and take a netmon trace. Your packets are going out to port 21 but what's coming back is just some random port >1024. - Original Message - From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:31 PM Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s) > Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least > host some Exchange services... > > It's completely random, from what MS has said in the past. And there's no > way to un-randomize it, and it can't be changed. Apparently the three lines > (whatever) of code that control this were too hard to rewrite for E2K too... > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:24 PM > Subject: New mail notification port(s) > > > Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail > notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and > 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is > there something else to it? > > Kevin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New mail notification port(s)
Um, no. There's no new mail notify over our Cisco VPN system, but we have another legacy system that allows those packets through. I'm trying to do research so my network guys have something to work with. Kevin - Original Message - From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:31 PM Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s) > Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least > host some Exchange services... > > It's completely random, from what MS has said in the past. And there's no > way to un-randomize it, and it can't be changed. Apparently the three lines > (whatever) of code that control this were too hard to rewrite for E2K too... > > Missy > - Original Message - > From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:24 PM > Subject: New mail notification port(s) > > > Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail > notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and > 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is > there something else to it? > > Kevin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New mail notification port(s)
Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company that wants to at least host some Exchange services... It's completely random, from what MS has said in the past. And there's no way to un-randomize it, and it can't be changed. Apparently the three lines (whatever) of code that control this were too hard to rewrite for E2K too... Missy - Original Message - From: "Kevin Derby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:24 PM Subject: New mail notification port(s) Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is there something else to it? Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New mail notification port(s)
Here's a nice explanation. http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/Topics/86.htm -Original Message- From: Kevin Derby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:24 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New mail notification port(s) Subject: New mail notification port(s) Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is there something else to it? Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New mail notification port(s)
Does anyone know the theory behind the randomization of new mail notification ports? I understand that it can be anywhere between 1024 and 65k. Is that one for each client, picked randomly from what's unused, or is there something else to it? Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
