RE: Emails per day
You don't swear as much as I do. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:40 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > Wonder what's wrong with me? I only got two Trend content > filter notifications. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Roger Seielstad > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:35 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of > course, PIMP wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got > none from my initial post. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Roger Seielstad > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > This is getting better all the time. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > And Mr. Scharff your bitch? > > > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger > > > Seielstad > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > Does that make me Scharff's Pimp? > > > > > > -- > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > I will do that. > > > > > > > > Mr. Scharff? > > > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > > Systems Administrator > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM > > > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - > > > we're looking > > > > at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. > > > > > > > > The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my > > > > environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be > > expensive for > > > > larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger > deployments. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just > > > > got the dog > > > > > and pony yeste
RE: Emails per day
Wonder what's wrong with me? I only got two Trend content filter notifications. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails per day Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of course, PIMP wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got none from my initial post. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > This is getting better all the time. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > And Mr. Scharff your bitch? > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger > > Seielstad > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > Does that make me Scharff's Pimp? > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > I will do that. > > > > > > Mr. Scharff? > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > Systems Administrator > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM > > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - > > we're looking > > > at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. > > > > > > The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my > > > environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be > expensive for > > > larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments. > > > > > > -- > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just > > > got the dog > > > > and pony yesterday and would be interested in what > people thought > > > > about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go > > with it? Why > > > > didn't you. > > > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > > Systems Administrator > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM > > > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > > > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser > > > > Quest - MessageStats > > > > NetIQ- AppAnalyzer > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: &
RE: Emails per day
You sure that's not your speeling chucker? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:53 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > I always get them from "Seielstad" > > - Original Message - > From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of course, > > PIMP wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got none from my > > initial post. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Roger Seielstad > > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > This is getting better all the time. > > > > > > -- > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > And Mr. Scharff your bitch? > > > > > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger > > > > Seielstad > > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > Does that make me Scharff's Pimp? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will do that. > > > > > > > > > > Mr. Scharff? > > > > > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > > > Systems Administrator > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > > > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM > > > > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - > > > > we're looking > > > > > at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. > > > > > > > > > > The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my > > > > > environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be > > > expensive for > > > > > larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger > > > > > deployments. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Se
Re: Emails per day
I always get them from "Seielstad" - Original Message - From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM Subject: RE: Emails per day > Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of course, PIMP > wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got none from my initial post. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > This is getting better all the time. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -----Original Message- > > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > And Mr. Scharff your bitch? > > > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > > Roger Seielstad > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > Does that make me Scharff's Pimp? > > > > > > -- > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > I will do that. > > > > > > > > Mr. Scharff? > > > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > > Systems Administrator > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM > > > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - > > > we're looking > > > > at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. > > > > > > > > The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my > > > > environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be > > expensive for > > > > larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just > > > > got the dog > > > > > and pony yesterday and would be interested in what > > people thought > > > > > about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go > > > with it? Why > > > > > didn't you. > > > > > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > > > Systems Administrator > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > > > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Randy Roffey [
RE: Emails per day
Wow. I just got 4 content filter notifications for this. Of course, PIMP wasn't the word that triggered it, since I got none from my initial post. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > This is getting better all the time. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > And Mr. Scharff your bitch? > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Roger Seielstad > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > Does that make me Scharff's Pimp? > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > I will do that. > > > > > > Mr. Scharff? > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > Systems Administrator > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM > > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - > > we're looking > > > at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. > > > > > > The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my > > > environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be > expensive for > > > larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments. > > > > > > -- > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just > > > got the dog > > > > and pony yesterday and would be interested in what > people thought > > > > about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go > > with it? Why > > > > didn't you. > > > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > > Systems Administrator > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM > > > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > > > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser > > > > Quest - MessageStats > > > > NetIQ- AppAnalyzer > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > > > > Subject: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to > > >
RE: Emails per day
This is getting better all the time. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:58 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > And Mr. Scharff your bitch? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Roger Seielstad > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > Does that make me Scharff's Pimp? > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > I will do that. > > > > Mr. Scharff? > > > > Ken Powell > > Systems Administrator > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - > we're looking > > at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. > > > > The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my > > environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be expensive for > > larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments. > > > > ---------- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just > > got the dog > > > and pony yesterday and would be interested in what people thought > > > about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go > with it? Why > > > didn't you. > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > Systems Administrator > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM > > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser > > > Quest - MessageStats > > > NetIQ- AppAnalyzer > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > > > Subject: Emails per day > > > > > > > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to > > find out > > > how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could > > check at the > > > firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. > > > Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that > > performance hit) and > > > we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to > > > assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and > > > externally. Thanks. > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > A
RE: Emails per day
And Mr. Scharff your bitch? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails per day Does that make me Scharff's Pimp? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > I will do that. > > Mr. Scharff? > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM > To: Exchange 5.5 List > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - we're > looking at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. > > The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my > environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be > expensive for larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for > larger deployments. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just > got the dog > > and pony yesterday and would be interested in what people thought > > about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go with it? Why > > didn't you. > > > > Ken Powell > > Systems Administrator > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > > > > Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser > > Quest - MessageStats > > NetIQ- AppAnalyzer > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > > Subject: Emails per day > > > > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to > find out > > how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could > check at the > > firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. > > Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that > performance hit) and > > we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to > > assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and > > externally. Thanks. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.
RE: Emails per day
Ewww! Very Ewww!! Ken Powell Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Emails per day Does that make me Scharff's Pimp? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > I will do that. > > Mr. Scharff? > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM > To: Exchange 5.5 List > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - we're > looking at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. > > The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my > environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be > expensive for larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for > larger deployments. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just > got the dog > > and pony yesterday and would be interested in what people thought > > about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go with it? Why > > didn't you. > > > > Ken Powell > > Systems Administrator > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > > > > Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser > > Quest - MessageStats > > NetIQ- AppAnalyzer > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > > Subject: Emails per day > > > > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to > find out > > how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could > check at the > > firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. > > Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that > performance hit) and > > we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to > > assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and > > externally. Thanks. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Arch
RE: Emails per day
Does that make me Scharff's Pimp? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > I will do that. > > Mr. Scharff? > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM > To: Exchange 5.5 List > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - we're > looking at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. > > The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my > environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be > expensive for larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for > larger deployments. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just > got the dog > > and pony yesterday and would be interested in what people thought > > about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go with it? Why > > didn't you. > > > > Ken Powell > > Systems Administrator > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM > > To: Exchange 5.5 List > > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > > > > Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser > > Quest - MessageStats > > NetIQ- AppAnalyzer > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > > Subject: Emails per day > > > > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to > find out > > how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could > check at the > > firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. > > Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that > performance hit) and > > we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to > > assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and > > externally. Thanks. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails per day
I will do that. Mr. Scharff? Ken Powell Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: Emails per day I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - we're looking at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be expensive for larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just got > the dog and pony yesterday and would be interested in what > people thought about it that use or have evaluated it. Why > did you go with it? Why didn't you. > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > -Original Message- > From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM > To: Exchange 5.5 List > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser > Quest - MessageStats > NetIQ- AppAnalyzer > > > - Original Message - > From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > Subject: Emails per day > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to > find out how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we > could check at the firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get > outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could > stand that performance hit) and we can monitor disk growth, > but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many emails > per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails per day
I have a copy of the eval that I have yet to install - we're looking at Foglight and they suggested it as an add on. The demo's I saw were nice. Its also priced correctly for my environment (<600 users). It struck me as it might be expensive for larger deployments. I'd look at MessageOne for larger deployments. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just got > the dog and pony yesterday and would be interested in what > people thought about it that use or have evaluated it. Why > did you go with it? Why didn't you. > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > -Original Message- > From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM > To: Exchange 5.5 List > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser > Quest - MessageStats > NetIQ- AppAnalyzer > > > - Original Message - > From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > Subject: Emails per day > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to > find out how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we > could check at the firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get > outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could > stand that performance hit) and we can monitor disk growth, > but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many emails > per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Emails per day
The problem with most applications which report on message traffic (not MessageStats specifically necessarily) is that they tend to do a relatively poor job of rolling up the data, so that in enterprise environments keeping long term historical data (possibly at a less granular level) for trending purposes involves additional scripting on your part. A question for the vendor would be how much space would 12 months worth of historical data occupy for your organization based on your estimated traffic. Course, I work for a vendor which makes a product which does what you're looking for along with a few other things, so please take my points with the grain of salt they deserve. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Exchange Monitoring & Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp Free Custom OWA Screens: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 3/13/03 18:36, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just got the dog and > pony yesterday and would be interested in what people thought about it that > use or have evaluated it. Why did you go with it? Why didn't you. > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > -Original Message- > From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM > To: Exchange 5.5 List > Subject: Re: Emails per day > > > Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser > Quest - MessageStats > NetIQ- AppAnalyzer > > > - Original Message - > From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > Subject: Emails per day > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how > many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the > firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon > might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can > monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many > emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Emails per day
Well, sort of. On 3/13/03 14:50, "Dean Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use SNMP it is easy, accurate and free. > > -Original Message- > From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Emails per day > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how > many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the > firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon > might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can > monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many > emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails per day
I use SNMP it is easy, accurate and free. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails per day This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails per day
Anyone have any opinions on Quest's MessageStats? I just got the dog and pony yesterday and would be interested in what people thought about it that use or have evaluated it. Why did you go with it? Why didn't you. Ken Powell Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Randy Roffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: Re: Emails per day Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser Quest - MessageStats NetIQ- AppAnalyzer - Original Message - From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM Subject: Emails per day This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Emails per day
Hypersoft - OmniAnalyser Quest - MessageStats NetIQ- AppAnalyzer - Original Message - From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM Subject: Emails per day This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails per day
Whenever I see that product name I think of the Blondie comic strip. I go into each mailbox and count the Sent Items. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stevens, Dave Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 6:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails per day we use promodag. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails per day This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Emails per day
i use e-nspect (www.e-nspect.com) mike - Original Message - From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:43 PM Subject: Emails per day This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails per day
You can also use the performance logs. You then use the details to either average the total sent or show specific days. We have just done our mail server's and last year averaged approx 100,000 a day. > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > we use crystal reports. > > > -- > > From: Stevens, Dave > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > > Sent: Friday, March 7, 2003 08:04 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject:RE: Emails per day > > > > we use promodag. > > > > > > > > Dave Stevens > > -IT Network Support- > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 865-576-8898 > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Emails per day > > > > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how > > many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the > > firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon > > might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can > > monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how > many > > emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails per day
we use crystal reports. > -- > From: Stevens, Dave > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Friday, March 7, 2003 08:04 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails per day > > we use promodag. > > > > Dave Stevens > -IT Network Support- > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 865-576-8898 > > > > -Original Message- > From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Emails per day > > > This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how > many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the > firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon > might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can > monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many > emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails per day
we use promodag. Dave Stevens -IT Network Support- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails per day This could well be a dumb question but, we've been asked to find out how many e-mails are sent in a single day. Now we could check at the firewall/mail gateway but that'd only get outbound/inbound mail. Perfmon might give a clue (if we could stand that performance hit) and we can monitor disk growth, but does anybody know a simple way to assess how many emails per day are sent both internally and externally. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails to clients that are restricted
Is somebody forging the headers? Trivially easy to do. Check to see if there are any SMTP headers in the messages, and if so, find the offender and put superglue on his or her keycaps. -- be - MOS You are confused; but this is your normal state. > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Emails to clients that are restricted > > > We have a couple of system accounts that we send email to > that no one has access to send back to via delivery > restricts. Well someone actually sent back and it go > through. Any idea's why? > > Thank you, > Â > Alex Gonzalez > Senior Systems Administrator > Handleman Company > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails to clients that are restricted
I really should have let someone else do this. Jeesh.. OS/SP/EX yada, yada, yada. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez@;handleman.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails to clients that are restricted We have a couple of system accounts that we send email to that no one has access to send back to via delivery restricts. Well someone actually sent back and it go through. Any idea's why? Thank you,  Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox
Cool, thank you for the help anyway. I'll just set the main user up to be able to mount the mailbox directly if this happens again. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox Other than unmarking them? Not in Outlook 2000, in Outlook 2002 I believe you can... but don't quote me on the latter. > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox > > Ah, the three messages were marked private. Stupid overlook. Is there a > way that I could allow private emails to show in a mailbox such as this? > Thank you very much, > Jer > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox > > > The messages in question are marked as private and/or the view is > configured > incorrectly. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:39 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Emails don't show in additional mailbox > > > > Exchange 2000 sp2 on a single server > > I have a disabled account with a mailbox that a user accesses via > > additional mailboxes in Outlook 2000 that isn't showing any messages. > It > > will show the amount of unread messages, but that is it, nothing appears > > in the inbox itself. If you mount the mailbox as the primary mailbox > > everything shows up, this works on multiple machines with different > users > > that have access to the mailbox too. The empty inbox when mounted as an > > additional mailbox is also machine and user id independent. Does anyone > > have any ideas as to why this may happen? It was working until today, > no > > changes were made to the AD, user rights or Exchange. I know I could > > recreate the mailbox after exporting the mail, but I want to see if I > can > > fix the problem first. > > Thank you in advance, > > Jer > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox
Other than unmarking them? Not in Outlook 2000, in Outlook 2002 I believe you can... but don't quote me on the latter. > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox > > Ah, the three messages were marked private. Stupid overlook. Is there a > way that I could allow private emails to show in a mailbox such as this? > Thank you very much, > Jer > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:44 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox > > > The messages in question are marked as private and/or the view is > configured > incorrectly. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:39 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Emails don't show in additional mailbox > > > > Exchange 2000 sp2 on a single server > > I have a disabled account with a mailbox that a user accesses via > > additional mailboxes in Outlook 2000 that isn't showing any messages. > It > > will show the amount of unread messages, but that is it, nothing appears > > in the inbox itself. If you mount the mailbox as the primary mailbox > > everything shows up, this works on multiple machines with different > users > > that have access to the mailbox too. The empty inbox when mounted as an > > additional mailbox is also machine and user id independent. Does anyone > > have any ideas as to why this may happen? It was working until today, > no > > changes were made to the AD, user rights or Exchange. I know I could > > recreate the mailbox after exporting the mail, but I want to see if I > can > > fix the problem first. > > Thank you in advance, > > Jer > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox
Ah, the three messages were marked private. Stupid overlook. Is there a way that I could allow private emails to show in a mailbox such as this? Thank you very much, Jer -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox The messages in question are marked as private and/or the view is configured incorrectly. > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:39 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Emails don't show in additional mailbox > > Exchange 2000 sp2 on a single server > I have a disabled account with a mailbox that a user accesses via > additional mailboxes in Outlook 2000 that isn't showing any messages. It > will show the amount of unread messages, but that is it, nothing appears > in the inbox itself. If you mount the mailbox as the primary mailbox > everything shows up, this works on multiple machines with different users > that have access to the mailbox too. The empty inbox when mounted as an > additional mailbox is also machine and user id independent. Does anyone > have any ideas as to why this may happen? It was working until today, no > changes were made to the AD, user rights or Exchange. I know I could > recreate the mailbox after exporting the mail, but I want to see if I can > fix the problem first. > Thank you in advance, > Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox
Change the view so he can see unread and read messages. -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails don't show in additional mailbox Exchange 2000 sp2 on a single server I have a disabled account with a mailbox that a user accesses via additional mailboxes in Outlook 2000 that isn't showing any messages. It will show the amount of unread messages, but that is it, nothing appears in the inbox itself. If you mount the mailbox as the primary mailbox everything shows up, this works on multiple machines with different users that have access to the mailbox too. The empty inbox when mounted as an additional mailbox is also machine and user id independent. Does anyone have any ideas as to why this may happen? It was working until today, no changes were made to the AD, user rights or Exchange. I know I could recreate the mailbox after exporting the mail, but I want to see if I can fix the problem first. Thank you in advance, Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails don't show in additional mailbox
The messages in question are marked as private and/or the view is configured incorrectly. > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:39 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Emails don't show in additional mailbox > > Exchange 2000 sp2 on a single server > I have a disabled account with a mailbox that a user accesses via > additional mailboxes in Outlook 2000 that isn't showing any messages. It > will show the amount of unread messages, but that is it, nothing appears > in the inbox itself. If you mount the mailbox as the primary mailbox > everything shows up, this works on multiple machines with different users > that have access to the mailbox too. The empty inbox when mounted as an > additional mailbox is also machine and user id independent. Does anyone > have any ideas as to why this may happen? It was working until today, no > changes were made to the AD, user rights or Exchange. I know I could > recreate the mailbox after exporting the mail, but I want to see if I can > fix the problem first. > Thank you in advance, > Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
I'm sorry David, I can't do that. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me My god, its full of stars -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me my God, mail admin and hasn't heard of KLEZ yet -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me Cue Tener and his amazing link! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
My god, its full of stars -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me my God, mail admin and hasn't heard of KLEZ yet -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me Cue Tener and his amazing link! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
the one below Louis... not meant for you but RBHATIA, I've been getting these for over two months now... -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me Im sorry? Are you sure your replying to the right mail? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me my God, mail admin and hasn't heard of KLEZ yet -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me Cue Tener and his amazing link! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
Firstly, when emails are received. Take a look at the headers. They usually explain a few things like where the message originated from. If there is a message header visible from a mail supposedly sent internally then you know it is from an outside source. Messages sent internally don't, if I am not mistaken, have an internet message header. Right click on the message and choose options. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
Im sorry? Are you sure your replying to the right mail? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me my God, mail admin and hasn't heard of KLEZ yet -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me Cue Tener and his amazing link! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
my God, mail admin and hasn't heard of KLEZ yet -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being sent as me Cue Tener and his amazing link! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
Firstly, when emails are received. Take a look at the headers. They usually explain a few things like where the message originated from. If there is a message header visible from a mail supposedly sent internally then you know it is from an outside source. Messages sent internally don't, if I am not mistaken, have an internet message header. Right click on the message and choose options. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
This isn't an issue of your Exchange server. It's more like someone is spoofing you. Of course there are also virus that take peoples address books and send messages as the name in the books. Or you could get a hold of old copies of Netscape and send e-mail as other people, but that can be annoying because you have to change the profile around. In other words, as far as I know, there is no way to stop this. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
Cue Tener and his amazing link! Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 June 2002 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
Sounds like Klez. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
Read RFC2821 and RFC2822. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being sent as me
Klez? Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being sent as me I have noticed recently emails have been going to people from my address when I haven't sent them. Also, some emails have been sent to me from my company address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but such a mailbox does not exist on my server. How can I control this from my Exchange server ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails
Taught me. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 May 2002 20:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails Or not. > -Original Message- > From: mark arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 2:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails > > > Sounds a little like you've got an open relay and the > messages are being received by your people as spam and also > relayed elsewhere. Check your system (IMS / smtp service) for relay > > -Original Message- > From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 20 May 2002 20:09 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Emails > > Can someone explain to me how a Spam message comes into the > company and picks up two of our domain extensions? Example: > the Spam message came from [EMAIL PROTECTED] When it > was received by one of our employees, the address had changed > to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@Day@Hoy (these domains are just an example). > > How did it pick up the 2 domain extensions and how can I > block these types of messages? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails
Or not. > -Original Message- > From: mark arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 2:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails > > > Sounds a little like you've got an open relay and the > messages are being received by your people as spam and also > relayed elsewhere. Check your system (IMS / smtp service) for relay > > -Original Message- > From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 20 May 2002 20:09 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Emails > > Can someone explain to me how a Spam message comes into the > company and picks up two of our domain extensions? Example: > the Spam message came from [EMAIL PROTECTED] When it > was received by one of our employees, the address had changed > to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@Day@Hoy (these domains are just an example). > > How did it pick up the 2 domain extensions and how can I > block these types of messages? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails
RFC821 and RFC822. No domain extensions were picked up, what you are seeing is the RFC822 header which has nothing to do with the RFC821 envelope. > -Original Message- > From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 2:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Emails > > > Can someone explain to me how a Spam message comes into the > company and picks up two of our domain extensions? Example: > the Spam message came from [EMAIL PROTECTED] When it > was received by one of our employees, the address had changed > to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@Day@Hoy (these domains are just an example). > > How did it pick up the 2 domain extensions and how can I > block these types of messages? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails
Sounds a little like you've got an open relay and the messages are being received by your people as spam and also relayed elsewhere. Check your system (IMS / smtp service) for relay -Original Message- From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 May 2002 20:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails Can someone explain to me how a Spam message comes into the company and picks up two of our domain extensions? Example: the Spam message came from [EMAIL PROTECTED] When it was received by one of our employees, the address had changed to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@Day@Hoy (these domains are just an example). How did it pick up the 2 domain extensions and how can I block these types of messages? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML
Nathan, So how did they solve the problem?! Allison On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, you wrote: > I've seen this happen on some of the other lists I'm on. Thank heaven for > procmail and mutt. :) > > It seems only the HTML replies from Outlook 2xxx users on Exchange 2k that > have this happening. Perhaps the IMC isn't converting something? I don't > have a 2k box to track it down on. But it doesn't appear to be the Linux > boxes running Major-Domo CGI or Lyris that are the cause, just a common > link. > > Nathan > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:06 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML > > > > > > The contents of the message body are included twice by > > default in Outlook > > (and most other mail clients) once as HTML and once as plain > > text... But the > > messages aren't sent twice. In order to know what is really > > going on, I > > think you'll need to turn up logging and watch what is being sent from > > Exchange. > > > > Chris > > -- > > Chris Scharff > > Senior Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:49 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML > > > > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > I will answer the questions in-line. > > > > > > On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, you wrote: > > > > I'm not really sure what your architecture is here. Are > > you saying > > > > that you have two separate email systems; one for > > internet mail and > > > > one for intranet mail? My first question, if this is the > > > case, is why? > > > > > > Yes, one server is located in the office for internal mail > > > (it is also the SMTP Server - we only send emails thru this > > > server). The other server is located externally at a hosting > > > company. We only check our external mail from this server, > > > and do not use it for sending our mail. Why? Well the best > > > reason is cost. We have to pay for external traffic (traffic > > > that flows from the office to the outside). So when we email > > > each other internally we don't have to pay for the traffic. > > > > > > > > > > If the above is correct, you have probably made a change on > > > your Linux > > > > system that is causing it to have an issue with the fact that E2K > > > > sends each message as both plain text and HTML. If that > > is the case > > > > you can either find out what you changed and remove the > > > change or get > > > > your Linux people to fix it. The next option is to change > > > the default > > > > Internet Mail Format to just plaintext. > > > > > > > > > Nothing has changed on the linux system. I am "the Linux people". > > > > > > > > > > By default E2K sends all internet mail as both plaint text > > > and HTML. > > > > Some non-Exchange systems have trouble with this. For > > those domains > > > > that have an issue you can set up domain exceptions under Global > > > > Settings/Internet Message Format in ESM. Choose to send > > > plain text OR > > > > HTML rather than both. > > > > > > > > > So its a "feature" that internet mail is sent twice? OR am I > > > misunderstanding? > > > But right now, my setting is "Message test as unformatted > > > Text". The "both" is unchecked. > > > > > > > > > > If your problem is just with a few external domains, you > > > might want to > > > > try an exception for one of the effected domains to see if > > > the result > > > > is better. > > > > > > It seems to be coming only from about half the users, to > > > anywhere they send emails. > > > > > > > > > > Tom. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, Novem
RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML
I've seen this happen on some of the other lists I'm on. Thank heaven for procmail and mutt. :) It seems only the HTML replies from Outlook 2xxx users on Exchange 2k that have this happening. Perhaps the IMC isn't converting something? I don't have a 2k box to track it down on. But it doesn't appear to be the Linux boxes running Major-Domo CGI or Lyris that are the cause, just a common link. Nathan > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:06 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML > > > The contents of the message body are included twice by > default in Outlook > (and most other mail clients) once as HTML and once as plain > text... But the > messages aren't sent twice. In order to know what is really > going on, I > think you'll need to turn up logging and watch what is being sent from > Exchange. > > Chris > -- > Chris Scharff > Senior Sales Engineer > MessageOne > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:49 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > I will answer the questions in-line. > > > > On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, you wrote: > > > I'm not really sure what your architecture is here. Are > you saying > > > that you have two separate email systems; one for > internet mail and > > > one for intranet mail? My first question, if this is the > > case, is why? > > > > Yes, one server is located in the office for internal mail > > (it is also the SMTP Server - we only send emails thru this > > server). The other server is located externally at a hosting > > company. We only check our external mail from this server, > > and do not use it for sending our mail. Why? Well the best > > reason is cost. We have to pay for external traffic (traffic > > that flows from the office to the outside). So when we email > > each other internally we don't have to pay for the traffic. > > > > > > > If the above is correct, you have probably made a change on > > your Linux > > > system that is causing it to have an issue with the fact that E2K > > > sends each message as both plain text and HTML. If that > is the case > > > you can either find out what you changed and remove the > > change or get > > > your Linux people to fix it. The next option is to change > > the default > > > Internet Mail Format to just plaintext. > > > > > > Nothing has changed on the linux system. I am "the Linux people". > > > > > > > By default E2K sends all internet mail as both plaint text > > and HTML. > > > Some non-Exchange systems have trouble with this. For > those domains > > > that have an issue you can set up domain exceptions under Global > > > Settings/Internet Message Format in ESM. Choose to send > > plain text OR > > > HTML rather than both. > > > > > > So its a "feature" that internet mail is sent twice? OR am I > > misunderstanding? > > But right now, my setting is "Message test as unformatted > > Text". The "both" is unchecked. > > > > > > > If your problem is just with a few external domains, you > > might want to > > > try an exception for one of the effected domains to see if > > the result > > > is better. > > > > It seems to be coming only from about half the users, to > > anywhere they send emails. > > > > > > > Tom. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:04 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > A recent problem has appeared in which emails sent by the > Exchange > > > users are being received twice. The plain text message > > header shows > > > it being sent from > > > the user machine, to the internal linux mail server to the > > recipient. > > > The HTML > > > mail has the same sent-time, but the receiving time is > > minutes later. > > &g
RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML
The contents of the message body are included twice by default in Outlook (and most other mail clients) once as HTML and once as plain text... But the messages aren't sent twice. In order to know what is really going on, I think you'll need to turn up logging and watch what is being sent from Exchange. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML > > > Hi Tom, > > I will answer the questions in-line. > > On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, you wrote: > > I'm not really sure what your architecture is here. Are you saying > > that you have two separate email systems; one for internet mail and > > one for intranet mail? My first question, if this is the > case, is why? > > Yes, one server is located in the office for internal mail > (it is also the SMTP Server - we only send emails thru this > server). The other server is located externally at a hosting > company. We only check our external mail from this server, > and do not use it for sending our mail. Why? Well the best > reason is cost. We have to pay for external traffic (traffic > that flows from the office to the outside). So when we email > each other internally we don't have to pay for the traffic. > > > > If the above is correct, you have probably made a change on > your Linux > > system that is causing it to have an issue with the fact that E2K > > sends each message as both plain text and HTML. If that is the case > > you can either find out what you changed and remove the > change or get > > your Linux people to fix it. The next option is to change > the default > > Internet Mail Format to just plaintext. > > > Nothing has changed on the linux system. I am "the Linux people". > > > > By default E2K sends all internet mail as both plaint text > and HTML. > > Some non-Exchange systems have trouble with this. For those domains > > that have an issue you can set up domain exceptions under Global > > Settings/Internet Message Format in ESM. Choose to send > plain text OR > > HTML rather than both. > > > So its a "feature" that internet mail is sent twice? OR am I > misunderstanding? > But right now, my setting is "Message test as unformatted > Text". The "both" is unchecked. > > > > If your problem is just with a few external domains, you > might want to > > try an exception for one of the effected domains to see if > the result > > is better. > > It seems to be coming only from about half the users, to > anywhere they send emails. > > > > Tom. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:04 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML > > > > Hi, > > > > A recent problem has appeared in which emails sent by the Exchange > > users are being received twice. The plain text message > header shows > > it being sent from > > the user machine, to the internal linux mail server to the > recipient. > > The HTML > > mail has the same sent-time, but the receiving time is > minutes later. > > The > > header for these mails show it going to the Exchange server to the > > recipient. > > > > Is there a way to stop this without removing the "Internet Mail" > > account from the Services list? The users need to check both the > > internal mail > > (Exchange) > > and the external (Internet Mail). > > > > The clients are using Outlook 2000 and the server is 2000 also. > > > > Note: Although the Exchange server has been in place for > some months, > > this problem has recently appeared. > > > > Thanks, > > A.W. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesea
RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML
Hi Tom, I will answer the questions in-line. On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, you wrote: > I'm not really sure what your architecture is here. Are you saying that > you have two separate email systems; one for internet mail and one for > intranet mail? My first question, if this is the case, is why? Yes, one server is located in the office for internal mail (it is also the SMTP Server - we only send emails thru this server). The other server is located externally at a hosting company. We only check our external mail from this server, and do not use it for sending our mail. Why? Well the best reason is cost. We have to pay for external traffic (traffic that flows from the office to the outside). So when we email each other internally we don't have to pay for the traffic. > If the above is correct, you have probably made a change on your Linux > system that is causing it to have an issue with the fact that E2K sends > each message as both plain text and HTML. If that is the case you can > either find out what you changed and remove the change or get your Linux > people to fix it. The next option is to change the default Internet Mail > Format to just plaintext. Nothing has changed on the linux system. I am "the Linux people". > By default E2K sends all internet mail as both plaint text and HTML. > Some non-Exchange systems have trouble with this. For those domains that > have an issue you can set up domain exceptions under Global > Settings/Internet Message Format in ESM. Choose to send plain text OR > HTML rather than both. So its a "feature" that internet mail is sent twice? OR am I misunderstanding? But right now, my setting is "Message test as unformatted Text". The "both" is unchecked. > If your problem is just with a few external domains, you might want to > try an exception for one of the effected domains to see if the result is > better. It seems to be coming only from about half the users, to anywhere they send emails. > Tom. > > -Original Message- > From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:04 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML > > Hi, > > A recent problem has appeared in which emails sent by the Exchange users > are > being received twice. The plain text message header shows it being sent > from > the user machine, to the internal linux mail server to the recipient. > The HTML > mail has the same sent-time, but the receiving time is minutes later. > The > header for these mails show it going to the Exchange server to the > recipient. > > Is there a way to stop this without removing the "Internet Mail" account > from > the Services list? The users need to check both the internal mail > (Exchange) > and the external (Internet Mail). > > The clients are using Outlook 2000 and the server is 2000 also. > > Note: Although the Exchange server has been in place for some months, > this > problem has recently appeared. > > Thanks, > A.W. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML
I'm not really sure what your architecture is here. Are you saying that you have two separate email systems; one for internet mail and one for intranet mail? My first question, if this is the case, is why? If the above is correct, you have probably made a change on your Linux system that is causing it to have an issue with the fact that E2K sends each message as both plain text and HTML. If that is the case you can either find out what you changed and remove the change or get your Linux people to fix it. The next option is to change the default Internet Mail Format to just plaintext. By default E2K sends all internet mail as both plaint text and HTML. Some non-Exchange systems have trouble with this. For those domains that have an issue you can set up domain exceptions under Global Settings/Internet Message Format in ESM. Choose to send plain text OR HTML rather than both. If your problem is just with a few external domains, you might want to try an exception for one of the effected domains to see if the result is better. Tom. -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails sent twice: once plain text, once HTML Hi, A recent problem has appeared in which emails sent by the Exchange users are being received twice. The plain text message header shows it being sent from the user machine, to the internal linux mail server to the recipient. The HTML mail has the same sent-time, but the receiving time is minutes later. The header for these mails show it going to the Exchange server to the recipient. Is there a way to stop this without removing the "Internet Mail" account from the Services list? The users need to check both the internal mail (Exchange) and the external (Internet Mail). The clients are using Outlook 2000 and the server is 2000 also. Note: Although the Exchange server has been in place for some months, this problem has recently appeared. Thanks, A.W. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being bounced back
I was sure, until two seconds after I hit "send" the entire world outside my WAN crashed down upon our ISP, and by domino theory, me. Then I questioned my surety. Certitude. Whatever. Today sucked. > -Original Message- > From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:11 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Emails being bounced back > Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back > > > Are you sure? > corus.jnj.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail-gw1.jnj.com > corus.jnj.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail-gw2.jnj.com > mail-gw1.jnj.cominternet address = 208.153.7.11 > mail-gw2.jnj.cominternet address = 208.153.7.12 > > Matthew > Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get > yours today! > http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp > > "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P > stands for > Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail > admin)..." Jim Schwartz > 8-16-01 > > > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:05 PM > >>>To: Exchange Discussions > >>>Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back > >>> > >>> > >>>There's no MX record for corus.jnj.com > >>> > >>>> -Original Message- > >>>> From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>> Posted At: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 09:08 AM > >>>> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > >>>> Conversation: Emails being bounced back > >>>> Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Sorry, > >>>> > >>>> The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > >>>> > >>>> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 9/26/2001 9:56 AM > >>>> Unable to deliver the message due to a > >>>> communications failure > >>>> The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Raymond Karsan > >>>> A;l=RKAWA1EX02-010926135550Z-216562 > >>>> > >>>> Ali Sethi > >>>> Engineer > >>>> > >>>> 170 South Warner Road > >>>> Suite 110 > >>>> Wayne, PA. 19087 > >>>> 610-971-9171 ext 306 > >>>> 610-971-9181 fax > >>>> www.kenexa.com > >>>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person > >>>> or entity to > >>>> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > >>>privileged > >>>> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, > distribution, > >>>> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in > >>>> reliance upon, this > >>>> information by persons or entities other than the intended > >>>> recipient is > >>>> prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If > >>>> you received > >>>> this communication in error, please contact the sender and > >>>delete the > >>>> material from any computer. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -Original Message- > >>>> From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:09 AM > >>>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>>> Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Full NDR please > >>>> > >>>> Stephen > >>>> > >>>> -Original Message- > >>>> From: Sethi, Ali > >>>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>>> Sent: 9/26/01 9:02 AM > >>>> Subject: Emails being bounced back > >>>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> A user is complaining that she cannot send emails to a > >>>> particular email > >>>> address. She receives the following 'Undeliverable message' > >>>> > >>>> Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure > >>>> > >>>> Could this possibly mean that there is something wrong on > >>>> their recipients > &
Re: Emails being bounced back
Send an e-mail to another e-mail address (e-mail server) and see if that works. Tx Ron Snapper - Original Message - From: "Sethi, Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:02 PM Subject: Emails being bounced back > Hello, > > A user is complaining that she cannot send emails to a particular email > address. She receives the following 'Undeliverable message' > > Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure > > Could this possibly mean that there is something wrong on their recipients > end? I don't see anything wrong on our Exchange server. I don't think it's > a relaying problem. > > Thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being bounced back
Are you sure? corus.jnj.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail-gw1.jnj.com corus.jnj.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail-gw2.jnj.com mail-gw1.jnj.cominternet address = 208.153.7.11 mail-gw2.jnj.cominternet address = 208.153.7.12 Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:05 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back >>> >>> >>>There's no MX record for corus.jnj.com >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>> Posted At: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 09:08 AM >>>> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List >>>> Conversation: Emails being bounced back >>>> Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back >>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry, >>>> >>>> The following recipient(s) could not be reached: >>>> >>>> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 9/26/2001 9:56 AM >>>> Unable to deliver the message due to a >>>> communications failure >>>>The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Raymond Karsan >>>> A;l=RKAWA1EX02-010926135550Z-216562 >>>> >>>> Ali Sethi >>>> Engineer >>>> >>>> 170 South Warner Road >>>> Suite 110 >>>> Wayne, PA. 19087 >>>> 610-971-9171 ext 306 >>>> 610-971-9181 fax >>>> www.kenexa.com >>>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person >>>> or entity to >>>> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or >>>privileged >>>> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, >>>> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in >>>> reliance upon, this >>>> information by persons or entities other than the intended >>>> recipient is >>>> prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If >>>> you received >>>> this communication in error, please contact the sender and >>>delete the >>>> material from any computer. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:09 AM >>>> To: Exchange Discussions >>>> Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back >>>> >>>> >>>> Full NDR please >>>> >>>> Stephen >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Sethi, Ali >>>> To: Exchange Discussions >>>> Sent: 9/26/01 9:02 AM >>>> Subject: Emails being bounced back >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> A user is complaining that she cannot send emails to a >>>> particular email >>>> address. She receives the following 'Undeliverable message' >>>> >>>> Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure >>>> >>>> Could this possibly mean that there is something wrong on >>>> their recipients >>>> end? I don't see anything wrong on our Exchange server. I >>>> don't think it's >>>> a relaying problem. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> _ >>>> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> _ >>>> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being bounced back
There's no MX record for corus.jnj.com > -Original Message- > From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 09:08 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Emails being bounced back > Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back > > > Sorry, > > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 9/26/2001 9:56 AM > Unable to deliver the message due to a > communications failure > The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Raymond Karsan > A;l=RKAWA1EX02-010926135550Z-216562 > > Ali Sethi > Engineer > > 170 South Warner Road > Suite 110 > Wayne, PA. 19087 > 610-971-9171 ext 306 > 610-971-9181 fax > www.kenexa.com > The information transmitted is intended only for the person > or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, > forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in > reliance upon, this > information by persons or entities other than the intended > recipient is > prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If > you received > this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the > material from any computer. > > > > -Original Message----- > From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:09 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back > > > Full NDR please > > Stephen > > -Original Message- > From: Sethi, Ali > To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: 9/26/01 9:02 AM > Subject: Emails being bounced back > > Hello, > > A user is complaining that she cannot send emails to a > particular email > address. She receives the following 'Undeliverable message' > > Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure > > Could this possibly mean that there is something wrong on > their recipients > end? I don't see anything wrong on our Exchange server. I > don't think it's > a relaying problem. > > Thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being bounced back
Excellent! Hey thanks Matthew. Thanks everyone that responded to this issue. Ali Sethi Engineer 170 South Warner Road Suite 110 Wayne, PA. 19087 610-971-9171 ext 306 610-971-9181 fax www.kenexa.com The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back I telneted to their box. corus.jnj.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail-gw1.jnj.com corus.jnj.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail-gw2.jnj.com mail-gw1.jnj.cominternet address = 208.153.7.11 mail-gw2.jnj.cominternet address = 208.153.7.12 I also sent a test message with a delivery receipt that came back successfully (very slowly though). To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Test of connectivity Sent:Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:04:19 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Cia, Maria [JJCUS] on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:22:27 -0400 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JJCUSNB:JJCUSNBEXS1 IMO you should send it again Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:08 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back >>> >>> >>>Sorry, >>> >>>The following recipient(s) could not be reached: >>> >>> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 9/26/2001 9:56 AM >>>Unable to deliver the message due to a >>>communications failure >>> The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Raymond Karsan >>>A;l=RKAWA1EX02-010926135550Z-216562 >>> >>>Ali Sethi >>>Engineer >>> >>>170 South Warner Road >>>Suite 110 >>>Wayne, PA. 19087 >>>610-971-9171 ext 306 >>>610-971-9181 fax >>>www.kenexa.com >>>The information transmitted is intended only for the person >>>or entity to >>>which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >>>material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, >>>forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in >>>reliance upon, this >>>information by persons or entities other than the intended >>>recipient is >>>prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If >>>you received >>>this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the >>>material from any computer. >>> >>> >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:09 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back >>> >>> >>>Full NDR please >>> >>>Stephen >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Sethi, Ali >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Sent: 9/26/01 9:02 AM >>>Subject: Emails being bounced back >>> >>>Hello, >>> >>>A user is complaining that she cannot send emails to a >>>particular email >>>address. She receives the following 'Undeliverable message' >>> >>> Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure >>> >>>Could this possibly mean that there is something wrong on >>>their recipients >>>end? I don't see anything wrong on our Exchange server. I >>>don't think it's >>>a relaying problem. >>> >>>Thanks >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubs
RE: Emails being bounced back
I telneted to their box. corus.jnj.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail-gw1.jnj.com corus.jnj.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail-gw2.jnj.com mail-gw1.jnj.cominternet address = 208.153.7.11 mail-gw2.jnj.cominternet address = 208.153.7.12 I also sent a test message with a delivery receipt that came back successfully (very slowly though). To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Test of connectivity Sent:Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:04:19 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Cia, Maria [JJCUS] on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:22:27 -0400 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:JJCUSNB:JJCUSNBEXS1 IMO you should send it again Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:08 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back >>> >>> >>>Sorry, >>> >>>The following recipient(s) could not be reached: >>> >>> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 9/26/2001 9:56 AM >>>Unable to deliver the message due to a >>>communications failure >>> The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Raymond Karsan >>>A;l=RKAWA1EX02-010926135550Z-216562 >>> >>>Ali Sethi >>>Engineer >>> >>>170 South Warner Road >>>Suite 110 >>>Wayne, PA. 19087 >>>610-971-9171 ext 306 >>>610-971-9181 fax >>>www.kenexa.com >>>The information transmitted is intended only for the person >>>or entity to >>>which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >>>material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, >>>forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in >>>reliance upon, this >>>information by persons or entities other than the intended >>>recipient is >>>prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If >>>you received >>>this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the >>>material from any computer. >>> >>> >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:09 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back >>> >>> >>>Full NDR please >>> >>>Stephen >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Sethi, Ali >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Sent: 9/26/01 9:02 AM >>>Subject: Emails being bounced back >>> >>>Hello, >>> >>>A user is complaining that she cannot send emails to a >>>particular email >>>address. She receives the following 'Undeliverable message' >>> >>> Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure >>> >>>Could this possibly mean that there is something wrong on >>>their recipients >>>end? I don't see anything wrong on our Exchange server. I >>>don't think it's >>>a relaying problem. >>> >>>Thanks >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>_ >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being bounced back
Sorry, The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 9/26/2001 9:56 AM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Raymond Karsan A;l=RKAWA1EX02-010926135550Z-216562 Ali Sethi Engineer 170 South Warner Road Suite 110 Wayne, PA. 19087 610-971-9171 ext 306 610-971-9181 fax www.kenexa.com The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back Full NDR please Stephen -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/26/01 9:02 AM Subject: Emails being bounced back Hello, A user is complaining that she cannot send emails to a particular email address. She receives the following 'Undeliverable message' Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure Could this possibly mean that there is something wrong on their recipients end? I don't see anything wrong on our Exchange server. I don't think it's a relaying problem. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being bounced back
Lets see the error, and don't take out any info. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sethi, Ali Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Emails being bounced back Hello, A user is complaining that she cannot send emails to a particular email address. She receives the following 'Undeliverable message' Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure Could this possibly mean that there is something wrong on their recipients end? I don't see anything wrong on our Exchange server. I don't think it's a relaying problem. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Emails being bounced back
Full NDR please Stephen -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/26/01 9:02 AM Subject: Emails being bounced back Hello, A user is complaining that she cannot send emails to a particular email address. She receives the following 'Undeliverable message' Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure Could this possibly mean that there is something wrong on their recipients end? I don't see anything wrong on our Exchange server. I don't think it's a relaying problem. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
