RE: Outlook BUG question
Why do you say this? Do you think it will continue to happen over and over again? I keep telling this to my manager but I have nothing to support the statement. I have been asking the question over and over again what causes this. I know logging into the mailbox with different clients will have negative effects and could be the cause. I'm wondering though if it could be the environment itself since the environment is running 2000 and the delegate is running 98. Any thoughts on that? One other thing... all the conf rm's displays their free busy time inconsistently. Is there any way to fix this? LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question That might work. I hope you don't mind doing it every couple of months or so! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed
RE: Outlook BUG question
If it happens once, you can bet it'll happen again. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Why do you say this? Do you think it will continue to happen over and over again? I keep telling this to my manager but I have nothing to support the statement. I have been asking the question over and over again what causes this. I know logging into the mailbox with different clients will have negative effects and could be the cause. I'm wondering though if it could be the environment itself since the environment is running 2000 and the delegate is running 98. Any thoughts on that? One other thing... all the conf rm's displays their free busy time inconsistently. Is there any way to fix this? LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question That might work. I hope you don't mind doing it every couple of months or so! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken
RE: Outlook BUG question
As much as I know you don't want to hear it: as far as I can figure, Microsoft's advice is spot-on... live with it or implement the auto-accept script! My understanding of the way Microsoft's resource booking works (without the script) is exactly the behavior you are seeing. Sue Mosher may have work arounds on her site-- www.slipstick.com, but I have a feeling that you're going to be stuck with it. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com
RE: Outlook BUG question
Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message
RE: Outlook BUG question
What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
RE: Outlook BUG question
Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Outlook BUG question
It was his singing, I had to turn down my computer. ;0) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Outlook BUG question
-Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Ah management logic. If I really want it to happen, and keep on issuing decrees to make it so, then it will happen. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Major Misconceptions Held By Your Boss: That things happen just because they want them to. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
So true.. our company logo should beWe love to micro manage LaCretia -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Ah management logic. If I really want it to happen, and keep on issuing decrees to make it so, then it will happen. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Major Misconceptions Held By Your Boss: That things happen just because they want them to. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message
RE: Outlook BUG question
I would just catch it and throw it right back at you!!! LaCretia -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Outlook BUG question
I have now placed my 'anti dung' screen on my monitor. Strange, i can no longer see mails from Richard Tener... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Outlook BUG question
Do you sell those? I could really use one? How about a 'full body anti dung suit'? I could really use one around here. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question I have now placed my 'anti dung' screen on my monitor. Strange, i can no longer see mails from Richard Tener... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Outlook BUG question
That might work. I hope you don't mind doing it every couple of months or so! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
