RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups
Right-click Recipients Recipient Update Services container, select Add, then select Recipient Update Service... Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential Domain that contains MSX servers and users is mixed mode. Domain with DLs (Universal Distribution Groups) is native. See second paragraph of my original post. I have found one Q article since my post that indicates I need a separate RUS in the domain that the DLs are replicated to. Unfortunately, it didn't spell out how to do that. More research on my part... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential Is your Windows 2000 domain in native mode? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run into a stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD UDGs and that the E2K store will convert these to USGs as needed. This is not what I'm seeing, so obviously, I'm confused... I have two AD domains: ADSTEST (native) and KIITEST (mixed). All user IDs and Exchange servers are in KIITEST. Connection agreements are in place to replicate everything except DLs into KIITEST (mixed mode domain). DLs go into ADSTEST (native AD). Everything seems to be working EXCEPT that when mailboxes are moved from the 5.5 server to the 2K server, any mailbox permissions granting access to members of a DL no longer work. Checking the DLs in question shows they are still USGs and have not been converted to USGs. Everything I've seen about DLs used to grant security always reference public folders - I've never seen mention about DLs used to grant security to mailboxes. Do DLs need to be USGs to grant access to mailboxes? If so, must I convert them manually? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups
Is your Windows 2000 domain in native mode? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run into a stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD UDGs and that the E2K store will convert these to USGs as needed. This is not what I'm seeing, so obviously, I'm confused... I have two AD domains: ADSTEST (native) and KIITEST (mixed). All user IDs and Exchange servers are in KIITEST. Connection agreements are in place to replicate everything except DLs into KIITEST (mixed mode domain). DLs go into ADSTEST (native AD). Everything seems to be working EXCEPT that when mailboxes are moved from the 5.5 server to the 2K server, any mailbox permissions granting access to members of a DL no longer work. Checking the DLs in question shows they are still USGs and have not been converted to USGs. Everything I've seen about DLs used to grant security always reference public folders - I've never seen mention about DLs used to grant security to mailboxes. Do DLs need to be USGs to grant access to mailboxes? If so, must I convert them manually? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups
Domain that contains MSX servers and users is mixed mode. Domain with DLs (Universal Distribution Groups) is native. See second paragraph of my original post. I have found one Q article since my post that indicates I need a separate RUS in the domain that the DLs are replicated to. Unfortunately, it didn't spell out how to do that. More research on my part... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential Is your Windows 2000 domain in native mode? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Universal Distribution Groups vs. Universal Security Groups Sensitivity: Confidential I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run into a stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD UDGs and that the E2K store will convert these to USGs as needed. This is not what I'm seeing, so obviously, I'm confused... I have two AD domains: ADSTEST (native) and KIITEST (mixed). All user IDs and Exchange servers are in KIITEST. Connection agreements are in place to replicate everything except DLs into KIITEST (mixed mode domain). DLs go into ADSTEST (native AD). Everything seems to be working EXCEPT that when mailboxes are moved from the 5.5 server to the 2K server, any mailbox permissions granting access to members of a DL no longer work. Checking the DLs in question shows they are still USGs and have not been converted to USGs. Everything I've seen about DLs used to grant security always reference public folders - I've never seen mention about DLs used to grant security to mailboxes. Do DLs need to be USGs to grant access to mailboxes? If so, must I convert them manually? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
