RE: help
OK, do you have ANY antivirus SW installed? If so, what exactly. -Original Message- From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: help No shit (excuse my french)...this totally has me stumpedthe error tells me "The Microsoft Exchange Directory service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 1 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 0 milliseconds: No Action" Source: Service Control Manager Event ID: 7031 This has happened 5 times today Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: help You have nothing but 7031 errors?? Those are SO non descriptive. -Original Message- From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: help Well, I rebooted and now I'm able to send out mail again. But the same problem as before, My IS and IMS still shuts down unexpectedly with the ID 7031 error. Are there any patches I need to put on besides the Win2k ones? thanks, Fred Valdez win2ksrvrsp2, ex55sp4 behind msproxy2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: help
No shit (excuse my french)...this totally has me stumpedthe error tells me "The Microsoft Exchange Directory service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 1 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 0 milliseconds: No Action" Source: Service Control Manager Event ID: 7031 This has happened 5 times today Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: help You have nothing but 7031 errors?? Those are SO non descriptive. -Original Message- From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: help Well, I rebooted and now I'm able to send out mail again. But the same problem as before, My IS and IMS still shuts down unexpectedly with the ID 7031 error. Are there any patches I need to put on besides the Win2k ones? thanks, Fred Valdez win2ksrvrsp2, ex55sp4 behind msproxy2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: help
You have nothing but 7031 errors?? Those are SO non descriptive. -Original Message- From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: help Well, I rebooted and now I'm able to send out mail again. But the same problem as before, My IS and IMS still shuts down unexpectedly with the ID 7031 error. Are there any patches I need to put on besides the Win2k ones? thanks, Fred Valdez win2ksrvrsp2, ex55sp4 behind msproxy2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
help
Well, I rebooted and now I'm able to send out mail again. But the same problem as before, My IS and IMS still shuts down unexpectedly with the ID 7031 error. Are there any patches I need to put on besides the Win2k ones? thanks, Fred Valdez win2ksrvrsp2, ex55sp4 behind msproxy2 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
help
win2ksp2, ex55sp4 behind msproxy2 I'm running into communications failures trying to send mail, my telnet tests are ok to ports 25 and 110, I'm not getting any events regarding this too. I'm able to receive mail though. This is the following message I get: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: hello Sent: 1/24/2002 6:27 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Fred Hotmail on 1/24/2002 6:27 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=global;l=EXCHANGE-020125022710Z-6 Can anyone help?, This is the first time I've run into this. Fred Valdez _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k
Did you re-install the service pack (sp4) Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k I've tried that, it comes up that the page cannot be desplayed. I have IIS running and it does webpages fine, but not this. Boy am I frustrated. It would be nice if it worked perfect the first time and then you got to play with errors. But when you don't know what to expect or do for your first time, it get annoying when you can't make it go vroom. Michael The page cannot be displayed - Original Message - From: "Fred Valdez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:50 PM Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > If you installed owa at the same time as the exchange server then it should > already be up by default...from another machine on the LAN (or local > machine), open a browser and point to > http://exchangeservermachinenameorIP/exchange , if the owa window > opens try > to logon and access a mailbox. > > > Fred Valdez > Network Administrator > > > -Original Message- > From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:23 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > Point taken. What I'm trying to do is experimental. I don't have the > funds for another machine to toy with at the present. So this is what > I have: > > Machine on net with IP. > DNS on machine that is authoritative. > mx pointer pointing to machine name. > Exchange 5.5 installed > W2K sp2 installed > Ex5.5 sp 3 (I think) installed > > It's also a webserver for the experimentation also. I know, a lot of > services on one machine, but again, it's for testing and learning. > > I'll go and reinstall the IIS and uncheck teh SMTP when I get home. > Where is > the best ONLINE source for what to do next. I've installed 5.5 but how > do I > really use it, such as getting OWA to work, having a user connect from > outside, etc. Thanks. > > Always learning > > Michael > > - Original Message - > From: "Benjamin Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:46 PM > Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > You are really better off running OWA on a different box than > > Exchange. That's really what it was designed for. Second, if you > > uninstall the SMTP Service from IIS, it will NOT shut down the > > Exchange services. They are completely separate. But you do need > > to actually uninstall it, not just shut it down. Re-install IIS, > > and choose to add/remove components, then just remove the SMTP > > Service. > > > > Ben Winzenz, MCSE > > Network/Systems Administrator > > Peregrine Systems > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:46 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > I've installed my first 5.5 on W2k. Can't seem to get the hang of > > what to > do > > next. OWA comes up with a permission error connecting to the > > /exchange > site. > > When you say shut down the smtp service, is that after or before the > > install. If I shut it down now, will that be shutting down the > > exchanges service? > > > > Michael > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:33 AM > > Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > > > > Exch 55 on W2K is better than NT4 any day of the week. BTW, > > > Uninstall the SMTP service! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:15 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > > > > > > I just inherited an installation of Exchange 5.5. on W2k, with > > > about 50 users. It was configured poorly (e.g. the installer > > > didn't bother > > disabling > > > IIS's SMTP services!). > > > > > > Before I take the time to fix it up, just wanted to take a poll of > whether > > > people were satisfied with Exch 5.5 on W2k servers. Whether that > > > setup > > has > > > worked well for people, or caused particular problems, focusing on > > > stability. I saw a couple of ringing endorsements in this forum > > > about > two > > > weeks ago. Any offsetting sob stories I should know about? > > > > > > If it doesn't work well we could upgrade to Exchange 2000. But > > > for this firm wouldn't particularly care about the > > > advantages--unless it's more st
Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k
I've tried that, it comes up that the page cannot be desplayed. I have IIS running and it does webpages fine, but not this. Boy am I frustrated. It would be nice if it worked perfect the first time and then you got to play with errors. But when you don't know what to expect or do for your first time, it get annoying when you can't make it go vroom. Michael The page cannot be displayed - Original Message - From: "Fred Valdez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:50 PM Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > If you installed owa at the same time as the exchange server then it should > already be up by default...from another machine on the LAN (or local > machine), open a browser and point to > http://exchangeservermachinenameorIP/exchange , if the owa window opens try > to logon and access a mailbox. > > > Fred Valdez > Network Administrator > > > -Original Message- > From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:23 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > Point taken. What I'm trying to do is experimental. I don't have the funds > for another machine to toy with at the present. So this is what I have: > > Machine on net with IP. > DNS on machine that is authoritative. > mx pointer pointing to machine name. > Exchange 5.5 installed > W2K sp2 installed > Ex5.5 sp 3 (I think) installed > > It's also a webserver for the experimentation also. I know, a lot of > services on one machine, but again, it's for testing and learning. > > I'll go and reinstall the IIS and uncheck teh SMTP when I get home. Where is > the best ONLINE source for what to do next. I've installed 5.5 but how do I > really use it, such as getting OWA to work, having a user connect from > outside, etc. Thanks. > > Always learning > > Michael > > - Original Message - > From: "Benjamin Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:46 PM > Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > You are really better off running OWA on a different box than > > Exchange. That's really what it was designed for. Second, if you > > uninstall the SMTP Service from IIS, it will NOT shut down the > > Exchange services. They are completely separate. But you do need to > > actually uninstall it, not just shut it down. Re-install IIS, and > > choose to add/remove components, then just remove the SMTP Service. > > > > Ben Winzenz, MCSE > > Network/Systems Administrator > > Peregrine Systems > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:46 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > I've installed my first 5.5 on W2k. Can't seem to get the hang of what > > to > do > > next. OWA comes up with a permission error connecting to the /exchange > site. > > When you say shut down the smtp service, is that after or before the > > install. If I shut it down now, will that be shutting down the > > exchanges service? > > > > Michael > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:33 AM > > Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > > > > Exch 55 on W2K is better than NT4 any day of the week. > > > BTW, Uninstall the SMTP service! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:15 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > > > > > > I just inherited an installation of Exchange 5.5. on W2k, with about > > > 50 users. It was configured poorly (e.g. the installer didn't > > > bother > > disabling > > > IIS's SMTP services!). > > > > > > Before I take the time to fix it up, just wanted to take a poll of > whether > > > people were satisfied with Exch 5.5 on W2k servers. Whether that > > > setup > > has > > > worked well for people, or caused particular problems, focusing on > > > stability. I saw a couple of ringing endorsements in this forum > > > about > two > > > weeks ago. Any offsetting sob stories I should know about? > > > > > > If it doesn't work well we could upgrade to Exchange 2000. But for > > > this firm wouldn't particularly care about the advantages--unless > > > it's more stable. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_
RE: outgoing mail
when i type nslookup i get dns request timed out. time out was 2 seconds. default servers unknown. i get that right away. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: OWA usage
Title: Message Tehe, it took me a second...hehe... - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:24 PM Subject: RE: OWA usage Hey, I don't think we are interested in what you are into. -Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA usage Let's begin here by saying that IANALList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outgoing mail
Title: RE: outgoing mail True...true.. ACI, I'm with everyone else.. You have a DNS problem. NO DNS, NO outbound email. Do you have your ISP's IP address listed in your Exchange DNS settings? How do desktops use DNS? If your unsure, find a server in your domain(preferably a PDC, BDC) and check it's DNS settings. Also try to web access something from that domain server. If you can get to a web site, then copy those DNS settings to the Exchange box and cycle the MSEXCHANGE IMS service and mail should fly outta there. -Rick -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outgoing mail Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't. Yahoo may or not reply depending on which server you get from the lookup. For example, I get a different IP and it wont reply. Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com http://mike.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Niels Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outgoing mail So what do you call this: Pinging yahoo.com [216.115.108.243] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.115.108.243: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=237 Reply from 216.115.108.243: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=237 Reply from 216.115.108.243: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=237 Reply from 216.115.108.243: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=237 ??? /\/iels -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outgoing mail Yahoo doesn't accept ICMP packets. Start, Run, Cmd, OK. NSLookup Set type=MX Superioraccess.net Tell me what you get back. -Original Message- From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outgoing mail I'm not too sure of how to use the nslookup. There is a problem with me accessing webpages, and I am not able to ping yahoo.com from the Exchange server. I am however able to do all of the above on other machines. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Encrypted RPC
On microsoft technet security white paper, they recommend setting up the Outlook client to use encrypted RPC. I am wondering if anyone has any recommendations on setting up a secure Outlook profile (Outlook 2000). Thanks for any input List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outgoing mail
Yahoo doesn't accept ICMP packets. Start, Run, Cmd, OK. NSLookup Set type=MX Superioraccess.net Tell me what you get back. -Original Message- From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outgoing mail I'm not too sure of how to use the nslookup. There is a problem with me accessing webpages, and I am not able to ping yahoo.com from the Exchange server. I am however able to do all of the above on other machines. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Meeting Request Confusion
Is it possible that the 2 people that received the message and shouldn't have been were setup as delegates of one or more of the people that were invited? This would explain why they received the invites. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 25 January 2002 3:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Meeting Request Confusion Exchange 5.5 SP4 using Outlook 98. NT 4.0 SP6a I have a user who sent a meeting request to four people this morning. She received a message back from the System Administrator account this afternoon saying two of the recipeints could not be contacted. However, the two recipients listed were NOT even invited on the initial request. Not only were they not invited, but they are no longer even members of the company, so I don't see where they could have "accidentally" been invited. There not in USRMGR or the Global Address list. This makes me wonder how many other people received the invitation that ARE part of the company but aren't one of the four members that should have been invited. When I go back to the original message, there are only four individual people listed. Baffling. This user also occasionally has mail get stuck in her OUTBOX, which is probably a totally separate issue. I find 6 or 7 reasons in technet that could be causing this issue, but I just thought I would throw the information in, just in case it rang a bell with somebody else. Anybody ever have a meeting request issue like this? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outgoing mail
I'm not too sure of how to use the nslookup. There is a problem with me accessing webpages, and I am not able to ping yahoo.com from the Exchange server. I am however able to do all of the above on other machines. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Message won't go... send message on behalf
> Good afternoon, > > Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4.. > > I have a delegate that is trying to REPLY to a message from the mailbox. > When they try and send the message they get 'you do not have permission of > the individual to send this email' message. > > I looked at Google and it says to give the delegate Owner permissions to > the Inbox. I have done that and I still get the same message. > > Please help. > > Regards, > > Mike Mitchell > Systems eMAIL Administrator > Alverno Information Services > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 > > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: can't send message on behalf
In Exch Admin, Give the delegate "Send As" rights to the mailbox. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: can't send message on behalf Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4.. I have a delegate that is trying to REPLY to a message from the mailbox. When they try and send the message they get 'you do not have permission of the individual to send this email' message. I looked at Google and it says to give the delegate Owner permissions to the Inbox. I have done that and I still get the same message. Please help. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: how do I change storage space warrning message?
If you say so... -Original Message- From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: how do I change storage space warrning message? There had to be a way.. David -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: how do I change storage space warrning message? No can doUnless you have a really nice budget for it. -Original Message- From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: how do I change storage space warrning message? How can I change the storage space limit warning message on Exchange 2000? Thanks in advance, David List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
can't send message on behalf
Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4.. I have a delegate that is trying to REPLY to a message from the mailbox. When they try and send the message they get 'you do not have permission of the individual to send this email' message. I looked at Google and it says to give the delegate Owner permissions to the Inbox. I have done that and I still get the same message. Please help. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: how do I change storage space warrning message?
There had to be a way.. David -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: how do I change storage space warrning message? No can doUnless you have a really nice budget for it. -Original Message- From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: how do I change storage space warrning message? How can I change the storage space limit warning message on Exchange 2000? Thanks in advance, David List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outgoing mail
Probably a DNS issue. Find one of the offending domains. FROM THE EXCHANGE SERVER, do an Nslookup. See if you can. -Original Message- From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outgoing mail The error message I get when I open the message in the IMS queue is "network error during host resolution" List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: how do I change storage space warrning message?
No can doUnless you have a really nice budget for it. -Original Message- From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: how do I change storage space warrning message? How can I change the storage space limit warning message on Exchange 2000? Thanks in advance, David List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
how do I change storage space warrning message?
How can I change the storage space limit warning message on Exchange 2000? Thanks in advance, David List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outgoing mail
The error message I get when I open the message in the IMS queue is "network error during host resolution" List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Meeting Request Confusion
TechNet is a Microsoft support site, it is very useful. http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/ -Original Message- From: mollahassani, parviz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Meeting Request Confusion What is technet for OUTBOX I have a user with same problem Thanks -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Meeting Request Confusion Exchange 5.5 SP4 using Outlook 98. NT 4.0 SP6a I have a user who sent a meeting request to four people this morning. She received a message back from the System Administrator account this afternoon saying two of the recipeints could not be contacted. However, the two recipients listed were NOT even invited on the initial request. Not only were they not invited, but they are no longer even members of the company, so I don't see where they could have "accidentally" been invited. There not in USRMGR or the Global Address list. This makes me wonder how many other people received the invitation that ARE part of the company but aren't one of the four members that should have been invited. When I go back to the original message, there are only four individual people listed. Baffling. This user also occasionally has mail get stuck in her OUTBOX, which is probably a totally separate issue. I find 6 or 7 reasons in technet that could be causing this issue, but I just thought I would throw the information in, just in case it rang a bell with somebody else. Anybody ever have a meeting request issue like this? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets
Personally, I would make them part of your AD structure and perform all authentication that way. However, without knowing all the specifics about your environment, my theory is more speculation than anything. Personally IMNSHO, if you're not sure of what you need to do, it sounds to me like you need to hire some outside help. D -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets So what do I need to do? No they are not part of AD -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets Your routing to the network which the server resides on is not correct. Maybe not even configured... Are these remote offices a part of your AD Forest? D -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets Hope someone out there can help!! I am running exchange2000 on my corp network,no problem there everyone sends & receives mail fine. I have been asked to include our retail stores to our exchange server. I have been able to pop mail for the retail stores, but not use the information store for them.(they can't access public folders or keep their mail on the server) The retail stores are on a different subnet & not part of our domain. When I do a trace route they never find the exchange server nor the Doms.Adding them to the domain will not work because they all use the same login. (big security problem)Do I need to add a route in a router or is this a issue with them not being on the domain Thanks Brien List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Meeting Request Confusion
What is technet for OUTBOX I have a user with same problem Thanks -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Meeting Request Confusion Exchange 5.5 SP4 using Outlook 98. NT 4.0 SP6a I have a user who sent a meeting request to four people this morning. She received a message back from the System Administrator account this afternoon saying two of the recipeints could not be contacted. However, the two recipients listed were NOT even invited on the initial request. Not only were they not invited, but they are no longer even members of the company, so I don't see where they could have "accidentally" been invited. There not in USRMGR or the Global Address list. This makes me wonder how many other people received the invitation that ARE part of the company but aren't one of the four members that should have been invited. When I go back to the original message, there are only four individual people listed. Baffling. This user also occasionally has mail get stuck in her OUTBOX, which is probably a totally separate issue. I find 6 or 7 reasons in technet that could be causing this issue, but I just thought I would throw the information in, just in case it rang a bell with somebody else. Anybody ever have a meeting request issue like this? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outgoing mail
I had a similar issue recently after dealing with an open relay. Even after closing up the relay, my outbound queue would not deliver mail until the queue was brought down to a reasonable number of messages (I believe it started delivering mail again when the number came down to a few hundred...I originally had 48,000 msgs!!). According to a PSS call to MS the IMS can get bogged down and stop delivering (even though the service may still be receiving inbound mail) mail... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: outgoing mail When you open up the message in the IMS que. What is the error? -Original Message- From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outgoing mail I currently have a problem with outgoing mail. Nothing is going through. I have incoming mail being sent to the users. but their out going mail is being queued at the internet mail service. It states that the message will continue to be retried until the configured maximum timeout period. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k
Point taken. What I'm trying to do is experimental. I don't have the funds for another machine to toy with at the present. So this is what I have: Machine on net with IP. DNS on machine that is authoritative. mx pointer pointing to machine name. Exchange 5.5 installed W2K sp2 installed Ex5.5 sp 3 (I think) installed It's also a webserver for the experimentation also. I know, a lot of services on one machine, but again, it's for testing and learning. I'll go and reinstall the IIS and uncheck teh SMTP when I get home. Where is the best ONLINE source for what to do next. I've installed 5.5 but how do I really use it, such as getting OWA to work, having a user connect from outside, etc. Thanks. Always learning Michael - Original Message - From: "Benjamin Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:46 PM Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > You are really better off running OWA on a different box than Exchange. > That's really what it was designed for. Second, if you uninstall the SMTP > Service from IIS, it will NOT shut down the Exchange services. They are > completely separate. But you do need to actually uninstall it, not just > shut it down. Re-install IIS, and choose to add/remove components, then > just remove the SMTP Service. > > Ben Winzenz, MCSE > Network/Systems Administrator > Peregrine Systems > > > -Original Message- > From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:46 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > I've installed my first 5.5 on W2k. Can't seem to get the hang of what to do > next. OWA comes up with a permission error connecting to the /exchange site. > When you say shut down the smtp service, is that after or before the > install. If I shut it down now, will that be shutting down the exchanges > service? > > Michael > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:33 AM > Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > Exch 55 on W2K is better than NT4 any day of the week. > > BTW, Uninstall the SMTP service! > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:15 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > > > > I just inherited an installation of Exchange 5.5. on W2k, with about 50 > > users. It was configured poorly (e.g. the installer didn't bother > disabling > > IIS's SMTP services!). > > > > Before I take the time to fix it up, just wanted to take a poll of whether > > people were satisfied with Exch 5.5 on W2k servers. Whether that setup > has > > worked well for people, or caused particular problems, focusing on > > stability. I saw a couple of ringing endorsements in this forum about two > > weeks ago. Any offsetting sob stories I should know about? > > > > If it doesn't work well we could upgrade to Exchange 2000. But for this > > firm wouldn't particularly care about the advantages--unless it's more > > stable. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
How long management will allow the server to be unavailable before they freak out. -Original Message- From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs Please explain, "time window"? -Original Message- From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed 60gb on some of our servers. One of these databases has 13gb of free space in it. We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed to complete in the time window every time. Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend? Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
How long is your time window? Dependent on the I/O capabilities of your system, it could take a few days to compress a 60GB store. You can roughly judge the speed by looking at the size of the temp DB during the process. It will slowly grow to about 47GB before it completes. 60GB isn't something to toy with. At absolute fastest transfer speeds, a 60GB file would take about 2 hours to transfer across a 100MB network link. Your internal I/O might be a little faster, but not by a whole lot. And by the way, your database should be defragmented every evening. Two runs for each database. What you are attempting to do is to compress the database by creating a copy with no whitespace in it. Ed Woodrick -Original Message- From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM Posted To: Exchange Sunbelt Conversation: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed 60gb on some of our servers. One of these databases has 13gb of free space in it. We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed to complete in the time window every time. Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend? Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: outgoing mail
When you open up the message in the IMS que. What is the error? -Original Message- From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outgoing mail I currently have a problem with outgoing mail. Nothing is going through. I have incoming mail being sent to the users. but their out going mail is being queued at the internet mail service. It states that the message will continue to be retried until the configured maximum timeout period. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Please explain, "time window"? -Original Message- From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed 60gb on some of our servers. One of these databases has 13gb of free space in it. We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed to complete in the time window every time. Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend? Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k
You are really better off running OWA on a different box than Exchange. That's really what it was designed for. Second, if you uninstall the SMTP Service from IIS, it will NOT shut down the Exchange services. They are completely separate. But you do need to actually uninstall it, not just shut it down. Re-install IIS, and choose to add/remove components, then just remove the SMTP Service. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Michael Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k I've installed my first 5.5 on W2k. Can't seem to get the hang of what to do next. OWA comes up with a permission error connecting to the /exchange site. When you say shut down the smtp service, is that after or before the install. If I shut it down now, will that be shutting down the exchanges service? Michael - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:33 AM Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > Exch 55 on W2K is better than NT4 any day of the week. > BTW, Uninstall the SMTP service! > > -Original Message- > From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:15 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > I just inherited an installation of Exchange 5.5. on W2k, with about 50 > users. It was configured poorly (e.g. the installer didn't bother disabling > IIS's SMTP services!). > > Before I take the time to fix it up, just wanted to take a poll of whether > people were satisfied with Exch 5.5 on W2k servers. Whether that setup has > worked well for people, or caused particular problems, focusing on > stability. I saw a couple of ringing endorsements in this forum about two > weeks ago. Any offsetting sob stories I should know about? > > If it doesn't work well we could upgrade to Exchange 2000. But for this > firm wouldn't particularly care about the advantages--unless it's more > stable. > > Thanks, > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain No this is not out of hand. I found the GUI result and saw that it did not have what I was looking for. My new question was for a command line method. And is this per server only, or can you do the entire NT domain? I do not want the GUI because it does not give me what I'm looking for. Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain OK this is getting out of hand. click action click connect to another computer comect to the server you want then click session -Original Message-From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain I found sessions under shared folders... Is there a command line method? Can you only look at each server? Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain AH. I was wondering where the "Connect" was; I wasn't seeing it before. Got it now. Thanks. -- Michael Leone, Systems Administrator Philadelphia Contributionship 210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 215-627-1752 x1282 F: 215-627-5354 -Original Message-From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Thats.. right-click My Computer->Manage->Action->Connect to another computer -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k
I've installed my first 5.5 on W2k. Can't seem to get the hang of what to do next. OWA comes up with a permission error connecting to the /exchange site. When you say shut down the smtp service, is that after or before the install. If I shut it down now, will that be shutting down the exchanges service? Michael - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:33 AM Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > Exch 55 on W2K is better than NT4 any day of the week. > BTW, Uninstall the SMTP service! > > -Original Message- > From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:15 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k > > > I just inherited an installation of Exchange 5.5. on W2k, with about 50 > users. It was configured poorly (e.g. the installer didn't bother disabling > IIS's SMTP services!). > > Before I take the time to fix it up, just wanted to take a poll of whether > people were satisfied with Exch 5.5 on W2k servers. Whether that setup has > worked well for people, or caused particular problems, focusing on > stability. I saw a couple of ringing endorsements in this forum about two > weeks ago. Any offsetting sob stories I should know about? > > If it doesn't work well we could upgrade to Exchange 2000. But for this > firm wouldn't particularly care about the advantages--unless it's more > stable. > > Thanks, > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
outgoing mail
I currently have a problem with outgoing mail. Nothing is going through. I have incoming mail being sent to the users. but their out going mail is being queued at the internet mail service. It states that the message will continue to be retried until the configured maximum timeout period. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Right. Try something like usrstat.exe from the RK. -- Original Message -- From: "Dahl, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:11:52 -0600 >I agree with Ben, the original question was "how do you get a list of NT >users logged in to the domain at any point in time?" This only shows you >who is connected to whatever computer share you are connected to at the >time. > >-Original Message- >From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:08 PM >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >Subject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > > > >Please just look around! What does it take, 5 seconds to look through the >fields you have available? You will find it under Shares, Sessions. I >really don't think that this will give you the information that you are >looking for, but that is how you get to it. > >Ben Winzenz, MCSE >Network/Systems Administrator >Peregrine Systems > >-Original Message- >From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:01 PM >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >Subject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > > > >I'm sorry, but now I can't find sessions. > > > >Courtney Piratzky >IT-Technical Services >Sr. Systems Programmer >Georgia System Operations Corporation >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >770-270-7212 > >-Original Message- >From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:00 PM >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >Subject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > >right click my computer/manage/click computer management then connect to >another computer. > >-Original Message- >From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PM >To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >Subject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > >> in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer >> then click sessions > >Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when >I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. > >List Charter and FAQ at: >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > >List Charter and FAQ at: >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > >List Charter and FAQ at: >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > >List Charter and FAQ at: >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > >This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you >are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to >others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete >this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be >unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > >List Charter and FAQ at: >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > -- Sherry, MOS+AXE -- List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
AFAIK, it should be roughly the same as it is for 5.5. Insert CD, run setup. Setup will detect that you already have Exchange installed, and will simply re-copy the files, which will then make it Enterprise. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers Good question. If you find out please let me know. I don't think there is one -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: front end servers and back end servers I have one more question. What is the installation process of upgrading from exchange 2000 standard to exchange 2000 enterprise edition? > or Cat5 to your user's hand to delete some emails ;) > - Original Message - > From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 13:34 > Subject: Re: front end servers and back end servers > > > > Thanks for the info everyone. I guess there is no way around this but to > > write a check to microsoft and put it on Bill Gate's forehead. > > > > > 16,000 megs , not KB > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:32 > > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > > > > > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front > End." I > > > > swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw > an > > > > event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to > > > > 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > > > > > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box > on > > > > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs > 1216 > > > > > and 1217 in the event log. > > > > > > > > > > Neil Hobson > > > > > > > > > > Silversands > > > > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > > > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > > > > For Enterprise Systems > > > > > For Collaborative Solutions > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > > > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > > > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > > > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition > of > > > > > exchange 2000? > > > > > > > > > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the > > > enterprise=20 > > > > > > =3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. > try = > > > > > =3D=20 > > > > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server > and a > > > > > > > > > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly > configured=20 > > > > > > and =3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. > = > > > > > Can=20 > > > > > > someone =3D tell > > > > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > > > > > > recommendations. Thanks alot. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > > > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is > addressed. > > > > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > > > > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > > > > > subsidiary companies. > > > > > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > > > > > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Geez...there is a delay. I sent my message well before your replies came through. Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain I found sessions under shared folders... Is there a command line method? Can you only look at each server? Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain AH. I was wondering where the "Connect" was; I wasn't seeing it before. Got it now. Thanks. -- Michael Leone, Systems Administrator Philadelphia Contributionship 210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 215-627-1752 x1282 F: 215-627-5354 -Original Message-From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Thats.. right-click My Computer->Manage->Action->Connect to another computer -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain OK this is getting out of hand. click action click connect to another computer comect to the server you want then click session -Original Message-From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain I found sessions under shared folders... Is there a command line method? Can you only look at each server? Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain AH. I was wondering where the "Connect" was; I wasn't seeing it before. Got it now. Thanks. -- Michael Leone, Systems Administrator Philadelphia Contributionship 210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 215-627-1752 x1282 F: 215-627-5354 -Original Message-From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Thats.. right-click My Computer->Manage->Action->Connect to another computer -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Meeting Request Confusion
I have seen past AA, who had delegate access to the mailbox. Whenever the manager was copied, the AA was copied, since the mailbox didn't exist, it would bounce back. As soon as I removed this name, the problem was gone. HTH, Mike -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Meeting Request Confusion Exchange 5.5 SP4 using Outlook 98. NT 4.0 SP6a I have a user who sent a meeting request to four people this morning. She received a message back from the System Administrator account this afternoon saying two of the recipeints could not be contacted. However, the two recipients listed were NOT even invited on the initial request. Not only were they not invited, but they are no longer even members of the company, so I don't see where they could have "accidentally" been invited. There not in USRMGR or the Global Address list. This makes me wonder how many other people received the invitation that ARE part of the company but aren't one of the four members that should have been invited. When I go back to the original message, there are only four individual people listed. Baffling. This user also occasionally has mail get stuck in her OUTBOX, which is probably a totally separate issue. I find 6 or 7 reasons in technet that could be causing this issue, but I just thought I would throw the information in, just in case it rang a bell with somebody else. Anybody ever have a meeting request issue like this? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Meeting Request Confusion
Check the Outlook client on the users that the message was sent to. They probably have old Delegate information in there so the request is being forwarded to their former admin who is no longer with the company thus returning the NDR. Hope that helps. Peter Dahl. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Meeting Request Confusion Exchange 5.5 SP4 using Outlook 98. NT 4.0 SP6a I have a user who sent a meeting request to four people this morning. She received a message back from the System Administrator account this afternoon saying two of the recipeints could not be contacted. However, the two recipients listed were NOT even invited on the initial request. Not only were they not invited, but they are no longer even members of the company, so I don't see where they could have "accidentally" been invited. There not in USRMGR or the Global Address list. This makes me wonder how many other people received the invitation that ARE part of the company but aren't one of the four members that should have been invited. When I go back to the original message, there are only four individual people listed. Baffling. This user also occasionally has mail get stuck in her OUTBOX, which is probably a totally separate issue. I find 6 or 7 reasons in technet that could be causing this issue, but I just thought I would throw the information in, just in case it rang a bell with somebody else. Anybody ever have a meeting request issue like this? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
Good question. If you find out please let me know. I don't think there is one -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: front end servers and back end servers I have one more question. What is the installation process of upgrading from exchange 2000 standard to exchange 2000 enterprise edition? > or Cat5 to your user's hand to delete some emails ;) > - Original Message - > From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 13:34 > Subject: Re: front end servers and back end servers > > > > Thanks for the info everyone. I guess there is no way around this but to > > write a check to microsoft and put it on Bill Gate's forehead. > > > > > 16,000 megs , not KB > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:32 > > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > > > > > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front > End." I > > > > swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw > an > > > > event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to > > > > 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > > > > > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box > on > > > > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs > 1216 > > > > > and 1217 in the event log. > > > > > > > > > > Neil Hobson > > > > > > > > > > Silversands > > > > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > > > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > > > > For Enterprise Systems > > > > > For Collaborative Solutions > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > > > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > > > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > > > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition > of > > > > > exchange 2000? > > > > > > > > > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the > > > enterprise=20 > > > > > > =3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. > try = > > > > > =3D=20 > > > > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server > and a > > > > > > > > > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly > configured=20 > > > > > > and =3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. > = > > > > > Can=20 > > > > > > someone =3D tell > > > > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > > > > > > recommendations. Thanks alot. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > > > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is > addressed. > > > > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > > > > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > > > > > subsidiary companies. > > > > > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > > > > > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets
So what do I need to do? No they are not part of AD -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets Your routing to the network which the server resides on is not correct. Maybe not even configured... Are these remote offices a part of your AD Forest? D -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets Hope someone out there can help!! I am running exchange2000 on my corp network,no problem there everyone sends & receives mail fine. I have been asked to include our retail stores to our exchange server. I have been able to pop mail for the retail stores, but not use the information store for them.(they can't access public folders or keep their mail on the server) The retail stores are on a different subnet & not part of our domain. When I do a trace route they never find the exchange server nor the Doms.Adding them to the domain will not work because they all use the same login. (big security problem)Do I need to add a route in a router or is this a issue with them not being on the domain Thanks Brien List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain expand shared files. You can e-mail direct & give me your # & I will walk you through it Brien -Original Message-From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain I'm sorry, but now I can't find sessions. Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain right click my computer/manage/click computer management then connect to another computer. -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain I found sessions under shared folders... Is there a command line method? Can you only look at each server? Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain AH. I was wondering where the "Connect" was; I wasn't seeing it before. Got it now. Thanks. -- Michael Leone, Systems Administrator Philadelphia Contributionship 210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 215-627-1752 x1282 F: 215-627-5354 -Original Message-From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Thats.. right-click My Computer->Manage->Action->Connect to another computer -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: Message I agree with Ben, the original question was "how do you get a list of NT users logged in to the domain at any point in time?" This only shows you who is connected to whatever computer share you are connected to at the time. -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Please just look around! What does it take, 5 seconds to look through the fields you have available? You will find it under Shares, Sessions. I really don't think that this will give you the information that you are looking for, but that is how you get to it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message-From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain I'm sorry, but now I can't find sessions. Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain right click my computer/manage/click computer management then connect to another computer. -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain shared files -Original Message-From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain I'm sorry, but now I can't find sessions. Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain right click my computer/manage/click computer management then connect to another computer. -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Please just look around! What does it take, 5 seconds to look through the fields you have available? You will find it under Shares, Sessions. I really don't think that this will give you the information that you are looking for, but that is how you get to it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain I'm sorry, but now I can't find sessions. Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain right click my computer/manage/click computer management then connect to another computer. -Original Message- From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain AH. I was wondering where the "Connect" was; I wasn't seeing it before. Got it now. Thanks. -- Michael Leone, Systems Administrator Philadelphia Contributionship 210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] V: 215-627-1752 x1282 F: 215-627-5354 -Original Message-From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Thats.. right-click My Computer->Manage->Action->Connect to another computer -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Trend Interscan Viruswall 5.01
Anyone using the new Trend SMTP Interscan Viruswall? Got a problem hope anyone can help with... Im having this problem with the new version 5.01. It has this HOP count setting that it trys to check before sending any internet bound email how many HOPs it will take to deliver the message. The default is 15. No matter what I have set this to, several domains we normally send to return NDR (nondeliverable, back to me). If I telnet port 25 into the MX record any one of those domains, from the same box interscan is running, I can send emails just fine. If I try to trace route one of those it always runs to 30 hops and times out. Anyone know how to turn this HOP count off so it will deliver anyway, or have ANY suggestions?? NDR error: :XXX:::XXX 0 (00120345) Too Many Hops Thanks, Mike List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain I'm sorry, but now I can't find sessions. Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message-From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain right click my computer/manage/click computer management then connect to another computer. -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Meeting Request Confusion
Exchange 5.5 SP4 using Outlook 98. NT 4.0 SP6a I have a user who sent a meeting request to four people this morning. She received a message back from the System Administrator account this afternoon saying two of the recipeints could not be contacted. However, the two recipients listed were NOT even invited on the initial request. Not only were they not invited, but they are no longer even members of the company, so I don't see where they could have "accidentally" been invited. There not in USRMGR or the Global Address list. This makes me wonder how many other people received the invitation that ARE part of the company but aren't one of the four members that should have been invited. When I go back to the original message, there are only four individual people listed. Baffling. This user also occasionally has mail get stuck in her OUTBOX, which is probably a totally separate issue. I find 6 or 7 reasons in technet that could be causing this issue, but I just thought I would throw the information in, just in case it rang a bell with somebody else. Anybody ever have a meeting request issue like this? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain or My computer> Manage> right click Computer Management >Connect to another computer. Either way gets you to the same place -Original Message-From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Thats.. right-click My Computer->Manage->Action->Connect to another computer -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA usage
Title: RE: OWA usage According to Microsoft. If you authenticate you need a CAL. So you more than likely you are having your users authenticate. If not then I hope their mail isn't important to them -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA usage I believe your Dell guy is wrong. I've heard from too many software vendors who deal with Microsoft products and licensing all the time that OWA users do need a CAL. If they didn't, you could get away with buying no CAL's by just having everyone use the web interface. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Andy Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA usage Below is what my Dell Licensing guy told me. From Dell: You don't need a CAL for the remote OWA access, though if the user has a machine that they are pulling data down to their Outlook directly off of the server then they would need a CAL. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage This is my major complaint is that I have people who travel and they like going into a local library of internet café and getting their emails, fax, and voice mails via the net. When my boss was in Europe last year he must have used 8 different machines. The way I got around it is that I only give a CAL to a machine while it is in use. Once it is no longer in use and not located on a laptop or on site for 24 hours the CAL is revoked. At least that is what is says in my exchange procedure manual and DR plan. Do not quote me and I am not a lawyer but a senior MS local office person told me that what I am doing is within the scope of the CAL. As long as it is a written procedure. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage Yes, but if each of those users has multiple computers they use to OWA into your system you licensing is still out of control. What I was thinking I'd need is some way to monitor (or perhaps lock out) usage by IP address or MAC address so I'd have some way of demonstrating how many computers are accessing OWA when the guys with the big red "M" on their chest show up at my door. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA usage We have a global OWAUsers group and only members of that group can access their email via OWA. Since the number of OWA users is less than the number of Non-OWA users this is not too hard to maintain. -- Jeff Eggleston == "Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:221397@exchangelist... OK, got the bad news from Microsoft. Every home user who accesses OWA from their home PC needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA. Problem is, how can I stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in? In theory, everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do. Any one got any ideas on how to monitor / control it? mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain Thats.. right-click My Computer->Manage->Action->Connect to another computer -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
You still didn't mention whether the drive you added has "at least" 60gb of free space. Assuming it does, what is stopping you from simply running the Performance optimizer to move the databases off the current drive, then expand the drive, then move them back by running Optimizer again? You do realize that running the defrag will likely take 12+ hours just by itself, during which time your server will be offline? Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs We have another drive we have added for the defrag and we need to defrag the database because there is only 300mb of free space on the database drive and to expand the disk, we need to move the database of the disk and expand them move it back. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation. "Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new file, which can take a long time. On average, it takes about one hour to defragment 5 to 10 GB of disk space. Also, you need enough free space for the offline defragmentation process to hold the new file. As a general rule, you should have 100 percent more free space than the amount you are defragmenting." So the question then begs whether you have the free space to even perform the defrag. May I also ask why you feel that it is so completely necessary to defragment your database? Is there a problem with the server? Is it not running smoothly? Are you anticipating that it will never grow larger? Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is reclaiming the white space. That is it. White space simply explained is just space in the database that is not currently being used, but will be used as the database grows. Since the space has already been reserved, your server does not have to work nearly as hard to procure more space and increase the size of the database. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed 60gb on some of our servers. One of these databases has 13gb of free space in it. We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed to complete in the time window every time. Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend? Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
I don't have a connect from my computer properties. Is this applicable only in a W2K domain? Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer then click sessions -Original Message- From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Who's logged on NT domain This may be a very stupid question, but how do you get a list of NT users logged in to the domain at any point in time? Thank you! Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain right click my computer/manage/click computer management then connect to another computer. -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
error 7031
Hello All, Win2ksrv sp2, Ex55sp4 Yesterday I completed an Ed Crowley Server move to a new box...everything seems to be ok, however, sometimes the IS and IMS will terminate unexpectedly with error ID 7031, I have to reboot the server to get it running again, this has happenned twice in the last 4 hours...just before I have to reboot, the server starts to slow down (hardware is 750mhz, 768mb memory)...this server only has 25 users running out of it. Are there any default services that I should make sure doesn't start or should disable? thanks, Fred Valdez Network Administrator List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
We have another drive we have added for the defrag and we need to defrag the database because there is only 300mb of free space on the database drive and to expand the disk, we need to move the database of the disk and expand them move it back. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation. "Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new file, which can take a long time. On average, it takes about one hour to defragment 5 to 10 GB of disk space. Also, you need enough free space for the offline defragmentation process to hold the new file. As a general rule, you should have 100 percent more free space than the amount you are defragmenting." So the question then begs whether you have the free space to even perform the defrag. May I also ask why you feel that it is so completely necessary to defragment your database? Is there a problem with the server? Is it not running smoothly? Are you anticipating that it will never grow larger? Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is reclaiming the white space. That is it. White space simply explained is just space in the database that is not currently being used, but will be used as the database grows. Since the space has already been reserved, your server does not have to work nearly as hard to procure more space and increase the size of the database. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed 60gb on some of our servers. One of these databases has 13gb of free space in it. We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed to complete in the time window every time. Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend? Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Form Help
Okay, now I have created a form, and need some help. I have three different categories represented by three radio buttons. They are Servers, Switches, and Routers, now each Radio button is accompanied by a drop down list with all the different names for each selection. Now I need help in the following situation when I click on the radio button for Servers, I want the other two radio buttons, and drop down lists to be automatically greyed out, and not be available. I know there is going to be alot of work involved in this, and can use any help anyone can offer. Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain > in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer > then click sessions Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option "Connect to another computer", when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA usage
Title: RE: OWA usage I believe your Dell guy is wrong. I've heard from too many software vendors who deal with Microsoft products and licensing all the time that OWA users do need a CAL. If they didn't, you could get away with buying no CAL's by just having everyone use the web interface. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Andy Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA usage Below is what my Dell Licensing guy told me. From Dell: You don't need a CAL for the remote OWA access, though if the user has a machine that they are pulling data down to their Outlook directly off of the server then they would need a CAL. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage This is my major complaint is that I have people who travel and they like going into a local library of internet café and getting their emails, fax, and voice mails via the net. When my boss was in Europe last year he must have used 8 different machines. The way I got around it is that I only give a CAL to a machine while it is in use. Once it is no longer in use and not located on a laptop or on site for 24 hours the CAL is revoked. At least that is what is says in my exchange procedure manual and DR plan. Do not quote me and I am not a lawyer but a senior MS local office person told me that what I am doing is within the scope of the CAL. As long as it is a written procedure. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage Yes, but if each of those users has multiple computers they use to OWA into your system you licensing is still out of control. What I was thinking I'd need is some way to monitor (or perhaps lock out) usage by IP address or MAC address so I'd have some way of demonstrating how many computers are accessing OWA when the guys with the big red "M" on their chest show up at my door. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA usage We have a global OWAUsers group and only members of that group can access their email via OWA. Since the number of OWA users is less than the number of Non-OWA users this is not too hard to maintain. -- Jeff Eggleston == "Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:221397@exchangelist... OK, got the bad news from Microsoft. Every home user who accesses OWA from their home PC needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA. Problem is, how can I stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in? In theory, everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do. Any one got any ideas on how to monitor / control it? mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA usage
Title: RE: OWA usage Below is what my Dell Licensing guy told me. From Dell: You don't need a CAL for the remote OWA access, though if the user has a machine that they are pulling data down to their Outlook directly off of the server then they would need a CAL. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage This is my major complaint is that I have people who travel and they like going into a local library of internet café and getting their emails, fax, and voice mails via the net. When my boss was in Europe last year he must have used 8 different machines. The way I got around it is that I only give a CAL to a machine while it is in use. Once it is no longer in use and not located on a laptop or on site for 24 hours the CAL is revoked. At least that is what is says in my exchange procedure manual and DR plan. Do not quote me and I am not a lawyer but a senior MS local office person told me that what I am doing is within the scope of the CAL. As long as it is a written procedure. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage Yes, but if each of those users has multiple computers they use to OWA into your system you licensing is still out of control. What I was thinking I'd need is some way to monitor (or perhaps lock out) usage by IP address or MAC address so I'd have some way of demonstrating how many computers are accessing OWA when the guys with the big red "M" on their chest show up at my door. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA usage We have a global OWAUsers group and only members of that group can access their email via OWA. Since the number of OWA users is less than the number of Non-OWA users this is not too hard to maintain. -- Jeff Eggleston == "Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:221397@exchangelist... OK, got the bad news from Microsoft. Every home user who accesses OWA from their home PC needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA. Problem is, how can I stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in? In theory, everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do. Any one got any ideas on how to monitor / control it? mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Who's logged on NT domain
in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer then click sessions -Original Message- From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Who's logged on NT domain This may be a very stupid question, but how do you get a list of NT users logged in to the domain at any point in time? Thank you! Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: front end servers and back end servers
I have one more question. What is the installation process of upgrading from exchange 2000 standard to exchange 2000 enterprise edition? > or Cat5 to your user's hand to delete some emails ;) > - Original Message - > From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 13:34 > Subject: Re: front end servers and back end servers > > > > Thanks for the info everyone. I guess there is no way around this but to > > write a check to microsoft and put it on Bill Gate's forehead. > > > > > 16,000 megs , not KB > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:32 > > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > > > > > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front > End." I > > > > swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw > an > > > > event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to > > > > 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > > > > > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box > on > > > > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs > 1216 > > > > > and 1217 in the event log. > > > > > > > > > > Neil Hobson > > > > > > > > > > Silversands > > > > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > > > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > > > > For Enterprise Systems > > > > > For Collaborative Solutions > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > > > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > > > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > > > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition > of > > > > > exchange 2000? > > > > > > > > > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the > > > enterprise=20 > > > > > > =3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. > try = > > > > > =3D=20 > > > > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server > and a > > > > > > > > > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly > configured=20 > > > > > > and =3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. > = > > > > > Can=20 > > > > > > someone =3D tell > > > > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > > > > > > recommendations. Thanks alot. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > > > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is > addressed. > > > > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > > > > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > > > > > subsidiary companies. > > > > > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > > > > > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Who's logged on NT domain
This may be a very stupid question, but how do you get a list of NT users logged in to the domain at any point in time? Thank you! Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems Programmer Georgia System Operations Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address
Title: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address Most spammers have a program which reads a list of email addresses. When connecting to an SMTP server the program can specify a Display Name and an email address. For example, if you are using Outlook Express you can specify an email address of 'Joe Smoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' This will be sent to the email address but with the name Joe Smoe. Spamming does this so that you Do not see information they want to hide. Andy -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address Thanks for the reply. I did try the bcc option but if you click on the recipients name it resolves to the correct name - i.e. if John Smith is in the TO: when you click on it you get the properties for John Smith. In my case, when you click on the name it resolves to Dave Jones. When I tracked the message, the message had the recipient as Dave Jones but on the email message itself the recipient was John Smith. Be kind people - but I still don't understand how this is happening. Thanks -Original Message- From: Niels Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 5:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address It also happens when the email was Bcc'ed to someone. The Bcc recipients email show the To: of the person to whom the email was sent. /\/iels -Original Message- From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address Spamsomeone has made a distibution list containing her email address...they do it this way so you don't see the other recipients in the list. thanks, Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address I have a case where User JSmith received an email in her inbox that was addressed in the TO: field to KJones. When I clicked on the TO: field the smtp address was user's JSmith's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I tracked messages for JSmith and KJones and the log said the message was only for JSmith. This was unsolicited email. The ceo wants an explanation of how this could happen. In a fuzzy way, I think I know but can someone give me a good explanation I can use. Thanks for your help List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets
No they are not in AD. The remote stores are win98 with the same login for all. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets Your routing to the network which the server resides on is not correct. Maybe not even configured... Are these remote offices a part of your AD Forest? D -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets Hope someone out there can help!! I am running exchange2000 on my corp network,no problem there everyone sends & receives mail fine. I have been asked to include our retail stores to our exchange server. I have been able to pop mail for the retail stores, but not use the information store for them.(they can't access public folders or keep their mail on the server) The retail stores are on a different subnet & not part of our domain. When I do a trace route they never find the exchange server nor the Doms.Adding them to the domain will not work because they all use the same login. (big security problem)Do I need to add a route in a router or is this a issue with them not being on the domain Thanks Brien List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SMTP Addressing
??? The To and the For are the same: [EMAIL PROTECTED] But the sender has set up his address book wrong (entered the wrong name for this address) /\/iels -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Addressing Below is the header, will someone please explain how in the TO: field it references a user that is different than the for field Thank you Received: from xxx.xxx.salesforce.com (app000.eng.salesforce.com [ipaddress]) by news0.salesforce.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E08ACEE418 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:04:05 + (GMT) Received: from app000 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by app000.eng.salesforce.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BF73B200DA for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:04:05 + (GMT) Message-ID: <3122264.1011733445769.JavaMail.sfdc@app000> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:04:05 + (GMT) From: Maryla Oleniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Robert Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Possible market opportunity in Italy -Original Message- From: Niels Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 5:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address It also happens when the email was Bcc'ed to someone. The Bcc recipients email show the To: of the person to whom the email was sent. /\/iels -Original Message- From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address Spamsomeone has made a distibution list containing her email address...they do it this way so you don't see the other recipients in the list. thanks, Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address I have a case where User JSmith received an email in her inbox that was addressed in the TO: field to KJones. When I clicked on the TO: field the smtp address was user's JSmith's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I tracked messages for JSmith and KJones and the log said the message was only for JSmith. This was unsolicited email. The ceo wants an explanation of how this could happen. In a fuzzy way, I think I know but can someone give me a good explanation I can use. Thanks for your help List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: front end servers and back end servers
or Cat5 to your user's hand to delete some emails ;) - Original Message - From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 13:34 Subject: Re: front end servers and back end servers > Thanks for the info everyone. I guess there is no way around this but to > write a check to microsoft and put it on Bill Gate's forehead. > > > 16,000 megs , not KB > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:32 > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front End." I > > > swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw an > > > event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to > > > 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > > > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box on > > > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216 > > > > and 1217 in the event log. > > > > > > > > Neil Hobson > > > > > > > > Silversands > > > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > > > For Enterprise Systems > > > > For Collaborative Solutions > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of > > > > exchange 2000? > > > > > > > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the > > enterprise=20 > > > > > =3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. try = > > > > =3D=20 > > > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > > > >=20 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a > > > > > > > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured=20 > > > > > and =3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. = > > > > Can=20 > > > > > someone =3D tell > > > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > > > > > recommendations. Thanks alot. > > > > >=20 > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > ** > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > > > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > > > > subsidiary companies. > > > > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > > > > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ** > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > _ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k
Sounds like ringing endoresements. Thanks for the responses. I think it will meet the needs of this firm well. allan -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k Exch 55 on W2K is better than NT4 any day of the week. BTW, Uninstall the SMTP service! -Original Message- From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k I just inherited an installation of Exchange 5.5. on W2k, with about 50 users. It was configured poorly (e.g. the installer didn't bother disabling IIS's SMTP services!). Before I take the time to fix it up, just wanted to take a poll of whether people were satisfied with Exch 5.5 on W2k servers. Whether that setup has worked well for people, or caused particular problems, focusing on stability. I saw a couple of ringing endorsements in this forum about two weeks ago. Any offsetting sob stories I should know about? If it doesn't work well we could upgrade to Exchange 2000. But for this firm wouldn't particularly care about the advantages--unless it's more stable. Thanks, List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation. "Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new file, which can take a long time. On average, it takes about one hour to defragment 5 to 10 GB of disk space. Also, you need enough free space for the offline defragmentation process to hold the new file. As a general rule, you should have 100 percent more free space than the amount you are defragmenting." So the question then begs whether you have the free space to even perform the defrag. May I also ask why you feel that it is so completely necessary to defragment your database? Is there a problem with the server? Is it not running smoothly? Are you anticipating that it will never grow larger? Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is reclaiming the white space. That is it. White space simply explained is just space in the database that is not currently being used, but will be used as the database grows. Since the space has already been reserved, your server does not have to work nearly as hard to procure more space and increase the size of the database. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed 60gb on some of our servers. One of these databases has 13gb of free space in it. We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed to complete in the time window every time. Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend? Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Judging by your 60GB DB, you need at least twice that in disk space to run ESEUTIL. That means, to run ESEUTIL at all, you need at least 120GB and I would say a little more to be safe for it to run. D -Original Message- From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed 60gb on some of our servers. One of these databases has 13gb of free space in it. We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed to complete in the time window every time. Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend? Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: front end servers and back end servers
Thanks for the info everyone. I guess there is no way around this but to write a check to microsoft and put it on Bill Gate's forehead. > 16,000 megs , not KB > - Original Message - > From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:32 > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front End." I > > swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw an > > event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to > > 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box on > > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216 > > > and 1217 in the event log. > > > > > > Neil Hobson > > > > > > Silversands > > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > > For Enterprise Systems > > > For Collaborative Solutions > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > > > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of > > > exchange 2000? > > > > > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the > enterprise=20 > > > > =3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. try = > > > =3D=20 > > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > > >=20 > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a > > > > > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured=20 > > > > and =3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. = > > > Can=20 > > > > someone =3D tell > > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > > > > recommendations. Thanks alot. > > > >=20 > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > ** > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > > > subsidiary companies. > > > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > > > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ** > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed 60gb on some of our servers. One of these databases has 13gb of free space in it. We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed to complete in the time window every time. Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend? Chris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: relocate transaction log files
Hehe - I work in Michigan. But we do have offices in Pleasanton. Those would be from our Remedy acquisition last year. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: relocate transaction log files Hey Ben, what city do you work in...there are two Peregrine buildings down the street from me..just curious...my office is in Pleasanton CA thanks, Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: relocate transaction log files You run the Exchange Optimizer. Let it move the files for you. It does quite a nice job of it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: relocate transaction log files I need an expert advice about the implications of moving transaction log files onto a different physical harddrive when exchange is already setup as a production state. I have read that if the log files are separated with the database files, backup recovery will not work. Besides that, are there any drawbacks on moving log files? Thanks alot. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: front end servers and back end servers
16,000 megs , not KB - Original Message - From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:32 Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front End." I > swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw an > event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to > 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box on > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216 > > and 1217 in the event log. > > > > Neil Hobson > > > > Silversands > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > For Enterprise Systems > > For Collaborative Solutions > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of > > exchange 2000? > > > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the enterprise=20 > > > =3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. try = > > =3D=20 > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > >=20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a > > > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured=20 > > > and =3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. = > > Can=20 > > > someone =3D tell > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > > > recommendations. Thanks alot. > > >=20 > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > ** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > > subsidiary companies. > > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ** > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: front end servers and back end servers
Yes, you are limited to 16gb for the non-enterprise edition. - Original Message - From: "Jimmy Dejesus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:42 Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > So if it means We're limited to 16GB, we need to upgrade to enterprise > edition? Or we would need to create multiple storege groups? Is this > correct? Our physical harddrive is Raid5 60gigs. > > > You've got the standard version if you're limited to 16Gb. > > > > Neil Hobson > > > > Silversands > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > For Enterprise Systems > > For Collaborative Solutions > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:32 > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > > > > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front End." > > I swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw > > an event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to > > 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box on > > > > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216=20 > > > and 1217 in the event log. > > >=20 > > > Neil Hobson > > >=20 > > > Silversands > > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > > For Enterprise Systems > > > For Collaborative Solutions > > >=20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D20 > > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of=20 > > > exchange 2000? > > >=20 > > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the=20 > > > > enterprise=3D20 =3D3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is=20 > > > > straight forward. try =3D > > > =3D3D=3D20 > > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > > >=3D20 > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > > >=3D20 > > > >=3D20 > > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and > > > > > >a > > >=20 > > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly=20 > > > > configured=3D20 and =3D3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on=20 > > > > another machine. =3D > > > Can=3D20 > > > > someone =3D3D tell > > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other =20 > > > >recommendations. Thanks alot. =3D20 > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=3D20 > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > >=20 > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > >=20 > > > ** > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 > > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > > > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do=20 > > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its=20 > > > subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please > > > > > contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or=20 > > > via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ** > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > ** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > > subsidiary companies. > > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ** > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: relocate transaction log files
Performance Optimiser - if it is Exchange 5.5 -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 17:04 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: relocate transaction log files I need an expert advice about the implications of moving transaction log files onto a different physical harddrive when exchange is already setup as a production state. I have read that if the log files are separated with the database files, backup recovery will not work. Besides that, are there any drawbacks on moving log files? Thanks alot. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
You cant add more storage groups cause standard only supports one. Sounds like you need an UG. -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers So if it means We're limited to 16GB, we need to upgrade to enterprise edition? Or we would need to create multiple storege groups? Is this correct? Our physical harddrive is Raid5 60gigs. > You've got the standard version if you're limited to 16Gb. > > Neil Hobson > > Silversands > http://www.silversands.co.uk > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > For Enterprise Systems > For Collaborative Solutions > > -Original Message- > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:32 > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front > End." I swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? > Also, I saw an event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is > limited to 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box > > on > > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs > >1216=20 and 1217 in the event log. =20 > > Neil Hobson > >=20 > > Silversands > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > For Enterprise Systems > > For Collaborative Solutions > >=20 > > -Original Message- > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D20 > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > >=20 > >=20 > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of=20 > > exchange 2000? > >=20 > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the=20 > > > enterprise=3D20 =3D3D edition of exchange. Other that that it > > > is=20 straight forward. try =3D > > =3D3D=3D20 > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > >=3D20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > >=3D20 > > >=3D20 > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server > > >and > > > >a > >=20 > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly=20 > > > configured=3D20 and =3D3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access > > > on=20 another machine. =3D > > Can=3D20 > > > someone =3D3D tell > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > > >=20 recommendations. Thanks alot. =3D20 List Charter and FAQ > > >at:=3D20 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > >=20 > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > >http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > >=20 > > > >** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and > > do=20 not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of > > its=20 subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in > > error, please > > > contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 > > or=20 via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ** > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > ** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please > contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or > via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
IIRC, Standard version only allows you one storage group... so if you want more, you gotta upgrade -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 09:43 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers So if it means We're limited to 16GB, we need to upgrade to enterprise edition? Or we would need to create multiple storege groups? Is this correct? Our physical harddrive is Raid5 60gigs. > You've got the standard version if you're limited to 16Gb. > > Neil Hobson > > Silversands > http://www.silversands.co.uk > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > For Enterprise Systems > For Collaborative Solutions > > -Original Message- > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:32 > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front End." > I swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw > an event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to > 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box on > > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216=20 > > and 1217 in the event log. > >=20 > > Neil Hobson > >=20 > > Silversands > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > For Enterprise Systems > > For Collaborative Solutions > >=20 > > -Original Message- > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D20 > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > >=20 > >=20 > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of=20 > > exchange 2000? > >=20 > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the=20 > > > enterprise=3D20 =3D3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is=20 > > > straight forward. try =3D > > =3D3D=3D20 > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > >=3D20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > >=3D20 > > >=3D20 > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and > > > >a > >=20 > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly=20 > > > configured=3D20 and =3D3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on=20 > > > another machine. =3D > > Can=3D20 > > > someone =3D3D tell > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other =20 > > >recommendations. Thanks alot. =3D20 > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=3D20 > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > >=20 > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > >=20 > > ** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do=20 > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its=20 > > subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please > > > contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or=20 > > via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ** > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > ** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > subsidiary companies. > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
So if it means We're limited to 16GB, we need to upgrade to enterprise edition? Or we would need to create multiple storege groups? Is this correct? Our physical harddrive is Raid5 60gigs. > You've got the standard version if you're limited to 16Gb. > > Neil Hobson > > Silversands > http://www.silversands.co.uk > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > For Enterprise Systems > For Collaborative Solutions > > -Original Message- > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:32 > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front End." > I swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw > an event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to > 16,000kb. What does this mean? > > > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box on > > > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216=20 > > and 1217 in the event log. > >=20 > > Neil Hobson > >=20 > > Silversands > > http://www.silversands.co.uk > > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > > For Enterprise Systems > > For Collaborative Solutions > >=20 > > -Original Message- > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D20 > > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > >=20 > >=20 > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of=20 > > exchange 2000? > >=20 > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the=20 > > > enterprise=3D20 =3D3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is=20 > > > straight forward. try =3D > > =3D3D=3D20 > > > microsoft.com/exchange > > >=3D20 > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > >=3D20 > > >=3D20 > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and > > > >a > >=20 > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly=20 > > > configured=3D20 and =3D3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on=20 > > > another machine. =3D > > Can=3D20 > > > someone =3D3D tell > > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other =20 > > >recommendations. Thanks alot. =3D20 > > > List Charter and FAQ at:=3D20 > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > >=20 > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > >=20 > > ** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20 > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do=20 > > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its=20 > > subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please > > > contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or=20 > > via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ** > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > ** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > subsidiary companies. > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SMTP Addressing
The display name was different from the actual email address. I can make the display name one thing, and the email address another. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! It is not weak to forgive, it is a gallant and brave act. - Wayne Dyer -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Addressing Below is the header, will someone please explain how in the TO: field it references a user that is different than the for field Thank you Received: from xxx.xxx.salesforce.com (app000.eng.salesforce.com [ipaddress]) by news0.salesforce.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E08ACEE418 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:04:05 + (GMT) Received: from app000 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by app000.eng.salesforce.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BF73B200DA for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:04:05 + (GMT) Message-ID: <3122264.1011733445769.JavaMail.sfdc@app000> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:04:05 + (GMT) From: Maryla Oleniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Robert Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Possible market opportunity in Italy -Original Message- From: Niels Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 5:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address It also happens when the email was Bcc'ed to someone. The Bcc recipients email show the To: of the person to whom the email was sent. /\/iels -Original Message- From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address Spamsomeone has made a distibution list containing her email address...they do it this way so you don't see the other recipients in the list. thanks, Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address I have a case where User JSmith received an email in her inbox that was addressed in the TO: field to KJones. When I clicked on the TO: field the smtp address was user's JSmith's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I tracked messages for JSmith and KJones and the log said the message was only for JSmith. This was unsolicited email. The ceo wants an explanation of how this could happen. In a fuzzy way, I think I know but can someone give me a good explanation I can use. Thanks for your help List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
You've got the standard version if you're limited to 16Gb. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:32 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: front end servers and back end servers Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front End." I swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw an event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to 16,000kb. What does this mean? > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box on > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216 > and 1217 in the event log. > > Neil Hobson > > Silversands > http://www.silversands.co.uk > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > For Enterprise Systems > For Collaborative Solutions > > -Original Message- > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of > exchange 2000? > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the > > enterprise=20 =3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is > > straight forward. try = > =3D=20 > > microsoft.com/exchange > >=20 > > -Original Message- > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > >=20 > >=20 > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and > >a > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly > > configured=20 and =3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on > > another machine. = > Can=20 > > someone =3D tell > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > >recommendations. Thanks alot. =20 > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > ** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please > contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or > via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: relocate transaction log files
Hey Ben, what city do you work in...there are two Peregrine buildings down the street from me..just curious...my office is in Pleasanton CA thanks, Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: relocate transaction log files You run the Exchange Optimizer. Let it move the files for you. It does quite a nice job of it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: relocate transaction log files I need an expert advice about the implications of moving transaction log files onto a different physical harddrive when exchange is already setup as a production state. I have read that if the log files are separated with the database files, backup recovery will not work. Besides that, are there any drawbacks on moving log files? Thanks alot. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a "Front End." I swear I saw it before, how come it is not showing up now? Also, I saw an event log for 1216 and 1217 saying that the storage is limited to 16,000kb. What does this mean? > You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box on > the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216 > and 1217 in the event log. > > Neil Hobson > > Silversands > http://www.silversands.co.uk > Microsoft Gold Certified Partner > For Enterprise Systems > For Collaborative Solutions > > -Original Message- > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 > Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 > Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List > Conversation: front end servers and back end servers > Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers > > > How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of > exchange 2000? > > > You can only set up a front end server if your running the enterprise=20 > > =3D edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. try = > =3D=20 > > microsoft.com/exchange > >=20 > > -Original Message- > > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > >=20 > >=20 > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a > > > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured=20 > > and =3D I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. = > Can=20 > > someone =3D tell > > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > > recommendations. Thanks alot. > >=20 > > List Charter and FAQ at:=20 > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > ** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do > not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its > subsidiary companies. > If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support > Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
The enterprise version supports saucer separation. -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of exchange 2000? > You can only set up a front end server if your running the enterprise > = edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. try = > microsoft.com/exchange > > -Original Message- > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured > and = I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. Can > someone = tell > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > recommendations. Thanks alot. > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k
And if you want to deal with the AD issues associated with a E2k install... thanks, Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k I just inherited an installation of Exchange 5.5. on W2k, with about 50 users. It was configured poorly (e.g. the installer didn't bother disabling IIS's SMTP services!). Before I take the time to fix it up, just wanted to take a poll of whether people were satisfied with Exch 5.5 on W2k servers. Whether that setup has worked well for people, or caused particular problems, focusing on stability. I saw a couple of ringing endorsements in this forum about two weeks ago. Any offsetting sob stories I should know about? If it doesn't work well we could upgrade to Exchange 2000. But for this firm wouldn't particularly care about the advantages--unless it's more stable. Thanks, List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
Sorry long year already. These are what I used and surprisingly it worked. http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=22837 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn ol/exchange/plan/hostedexch/deploygd/aspd06xx.asp ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers Eh? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:03 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: front end servers and back end servers Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers Get the ows 200 disk. Install just OWA from the disk setup. You are up and running. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: front end servers and back end servers I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured and I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. Can someone tell me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other recommendations. Thanks alot. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
SMTP Addressing
Below is the header, will someone please explain how in the TO: field it references a user that is different than the for field Thank you Received: from xxx.xxx.salesforce.com (app000.eng.salesforce.com [ipaddress]) by news0.salesforce.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E08ACEE418 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:04:05 + (GMT) Received: from app000 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by app000.eng.salesforce.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BF73B200DA for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:04:05 + (GMT) Message-ID: <3122264.1011733445769.JavaMail.sfdc@app000> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:04:05 + (GMT) From: Maryla Oleniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Robert Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Possible market opportunity in Italy -Original Message- From: Niels Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 5:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address It also happens when the email was Bcc'ed to someone. The Bcc recipients email show the To: of the person to whom the email was sent. /\/iels -Original Message- From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address Spamsomeone has made a distibution list containing her email address...they do it this way so you don't see the other recipients in the list. thanks, Fred Valdez Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address I have a case where User JSmith received an email in her inbox that was addressed in the TO: field to KJones. When I clicked on the TO: field the smtp address was user's JSmith's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I tracked messages for JSmith and KJones and the log said the message was only for JSmith. This was unsolicited email. The ceo wants an explanation of how this could happen. In a fuzzy way, I think I know but can someone give me a good explanation I can use. Thanks for your help List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
You could always check for the presence of the "Front End" tick-box on the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216 and 1217 in the event log. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:19 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: front end servers and back end servers Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of exchange 2000? > You can only set up a front end server if your running the enterprise > = edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. try = > microsoft.com/exchange > > -Original Message- > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured > and = I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. Can > someone = tell > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > recommendations. Thanks alot. > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets
Your routing to the network which the server resides on is not correct. Maybe not even configured... Are these remote offices a part of your AD Forest? D -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets Hope someone out there can help!! I am running exchange2000 on my corp network,no problem there everyone sends & receives mail fine. I have been asked to include our retail stores to our exchange server. I have been able to pop mail for the retail stores, but not use the information store for them.(they can't access public folders or keep their mail on the server) The retail stores are on a different subnet & not part of our domain. When I do a trace route they never find the exchange server nor the Doms.Adding them to the domain will not work because they all use the same login. (big security problem)Do I need to add a route in a router or is this a issue with them not being on the domain Thanks Brien List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of exchange 2000? > You can only set up a front end server if your running the enterprise = > edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. try = > microsoft.com/exchange > > -Original Message- > From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: front end servers and back end servers > > > I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a > back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured and = > I > would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. Can someone = > tell > me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other > recommendations. Thanks alot. > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
Eh? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:03 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: front end servers and back end servers Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers Get the ows 200 disk. Install just OWA from the disk setup. You are up and running. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: front end servers and back end servers I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured and I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. Can someone tell me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other recommendations. Thanks alot. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: relocate transaction log files
You run the Exchange Optimizer. Let it move the files for you. It does quite a nice job of it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: relocate transaction log files I need an expert advice about the implications of moving transaction log files onto a different physical harddrive when exchange is already setup as a production state. I have read that if the log files are separated with the database files, backup recovery will not work. Besides that, are there any drawbacks on moving log files? Thanks alot. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: relocate transaction log files
Exchange 5.5 - run the Performance Optimiser. Exchange 2000 - make the changes in ESM, stores will dismount etc. It's recommended to move the logs to a separate drive. If you're really worried, make a backup before and after. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:04 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: relocate transaction log files Subject: relocate transaction log files I need an expert advice about the implications of moving transaction log files onto a different physical harddrive when exchange is already setup as a production state. I have read that if the log files are separated with the database files, backup recovery will not work. Besides that, are there any drawbacks on moving log files? Thanks alot. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: front end servers and back end servers
Get the ows 200 disk. Install just OWA from the disk setup. You are up and running. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: front end servers and back end servers I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured and I would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. Can someone tell me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other recommendations. Thanks alot. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
relocate transaction log files
I need an expert advice about the implications of moving transaction log files onto a different physical harddrive when exchange is already setup as a production state. I have read that if the log files are separated with the database files, backup recovery will not work. Besides that, are there any drawbacks on moving log files? Thanks alot. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
