RE: Off Subject - DNS Set Up
Title: RE: Off Subject - DNS Set Up You are correct. DNS is a stupid human trick used to translate IP addresses into something we can actually remember such as www.mycompany.com. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+ IT Manager Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Allen Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Off Subject - DNS Set Up Would someone let me know if I am headed down the right path on my set up of DNS? I have a book on Win2K Server and have read many times the chapter on DNS, and have gone through all of the sets in the book. ( or so I think ) What I want is to show www.mycompany.com instead of 65.65.65.65, and I am thinking that DNS is what shows the world the correct information. Am I on the right path with looking into DNS or is this done by some other means? Thanks, Allen __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: LDAP Servers
Get the MS LDAP provider! It's an add-in that will allow you to set up an LDAP server as another address book -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 01:02 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: LDAP Servers I only wanted to query the servers, and I am sorry but I don't know how the users could access the server directly? do you mean setup in outlook or something? Regards, Jason Dwyer -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2002 3:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: LDAP Servers Were you thinking of synching directory information? Or just querying? Can the users not access the LDAP server directly? William -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: LDAP Servers Hi guys, Just wondering if someone may be able to shed some light on an issue for me. I have a client with Exch 2000 sp2 and they are affiliated with a large number of other offices. Their head office has setup an ldap server with the entire address book for all offices. How can I make this available to all users through Exchange? Regards, Jason Dwyer List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Sorry test with new subscription
Knowing a little german (from afrikaans I'll try a translation: red mush with cream? Yup. Made with strawberry, raspberry or whichever red berry you can find. If you want to know what it sounds like, just swallow your tongue and say the first five syllable word that comes to mind. Torben List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
AW: Outlook in Other Languages
For German: 1) Öffentliche Ordner (or if don't find this Ö: Oeffentliche Ordner) 2) Persönliches Adressbuch (ö - oe) 3) Persönliche Ordner 4) Outlook Adressbuch ...and some of the translations could also be find in the exmerge.ini file... French: 1) Dossiers Publics 2) Carnet d'adresses personnel 3) Dossiers personnels 4) Carnet d'adresses Outlook Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2002 13:21 An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Betreff: Outlook in Other Languages I know I've asked this before but I need some help. I'm looking for translations of the following terms as they apply to Outlook: 1) Public Folders 2) Personal Address Book 3) Personal Folders 4) Outlook Address Book If you are a user of Outlook in Dutch, French, German, Italian, Spanish etc, I would be grateful if you could send me the text that is displayed by Outlook for these terms. To explain, I have a utility that builds mail profiles from the command line (createprf.exe at www.mailsoftware.co.uk). However, the interface I use creates these profiles with English text. If people on this list can give me these translations, I can rebuild this utility for international use. Thanks. Kevin PS Thanks to Sander Filius for pointing this out! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Norton Gateway 2.5
Has anyone had any experience with this produce. If so, any comparisons on how it compares to Anti Gen? Thanks Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Gateway 2.5
Title: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 I use with with little problems -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Gateway 2.5 Has anyone had any experience with this produce. If so, any comparisons on how it compares to Anti Gen? Thanks Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Gateway 2.5
What kind of produce. I'm more into veggies than fruit. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Gateway 2.5 Has anyone had any experience with this produce. If so, any comparisons on how it compares to Anti Gen? Thanks Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Gateway 2.5
well! I'm a meat and potatoes man myself, but a little fish does no harm... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 03:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 What kind of produce. I'm more into veggies than fruit. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Gateway 2.5 Has anyone had any experience with this produce. If so, any comparisons on how it compares to Anti Gen? Thanks Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Gateway 2.5
I saw that coming -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 well! I'm a meat and potatoes man myself, but a little fish does no harm... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 03:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 What kind of produce. I'm more into veggies than fruit. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Gateway 2.5 Has anyone had any experience with this produce. If so, any comparisons on how it compares to Anti Gen? Thanks Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Off Subject - DNS Set Up
Title: RE: Off Subject - DNS Set Up Check out DNS and Bind 4th edition...the end all and know all of DNS -Original Message- From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Off Subject - DNS Set Up You are correct. DNS is a stupid human trick used to translate IP addresses into something we can actually remember such as www.mycompany.com. Jim Zangara, MCSE+I, A+ IT Manager Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Allen Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Off Subject - DNS Set Up Would someone let me know if I am headed down the right path on my set up of DNS? I have a book on Win2K Server and have read many times the chapter on DNS, and have gone through all of the sets in the book. ( or so I think ) What I want is to show www.mycompany.com instead of 65.65.65.65, and I am thinking that DNS is what shows the world the correct information. Am I on the right path with looking into DNS or is this done by some other means? Thanks, Allen __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Gateway 2.5
Hey! I'll take the lickin' and keep on tickin'. Now I'm hungry. Thanks a lot. -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 well! I'm a meat and potatoes man myself, but a little fish does no harm... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 03:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 What kind of produce. I'm more into veggies than fruit. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Gateway 2.5 Has anyone had any experience with this produce. If so, any comparisons on how it compares to Anti Gen? Thanks Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Outlook Blockers
Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
on install you can adjust it for certain attachments. or use the reg-hack hkcu\software\microsoft\office\10.0\outlook\security new string value "Level1Remove" and enter the extensions you wish to allow (ie mdb;exe;com;bat;) Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Unfortunately, even with the registry hacks to allow sending and receiving of the attachments without question, the user would have to save them to the computer in order to open them. -Original Message-From: Thompson, Elizabeth Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:00 AMTo: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'Subject: RE: Outlook Blockers on install you can adjust it for certain attachments. or use the reg-hack hkcu\software\microsoft\office\10.0\outlook\security new string value "Level1Remove" and enter the extensions you wish to allow (ie mdb;exe;com;bat;) Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
go to www.slipstick.com. I think there is a reghack. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message here is a link to detachXP You can change registry-settings without going to the registry. All types off attachments can be changed. This works for one workstation at a time. http://www.mcdev.com/ Mark. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: donderdag 11 april 2002 15:54To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Gateway 2.5
I know. Me too! -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 Hey! I'll take the lickin' and keep on tickin'. Now I'm hungry. Thanks a lot. -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 well! I'm a meat and potatoes man myself, but a little fish does no harm... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 03:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 What kind of produce. I'm more into veggies than fruit. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Gateway 2.5 Has anyone had any experience with this produce. If so, any comparisons on how it compares to Anti Gen? Thanks Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message I couldn't find the whitepaper, but the info seems to have been supplanted by a series of links and KB articles. http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/Out2ksec.aspx http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q263296 You install the OL98/2K security enhancement, and it will block all Level 1 attachments by default. If you have Exchange, you can set a flag in the Registry that instructs the OL security update to look for a special PF that will override the default settings. The PF doesn't receive the attachments, but is a custom-developed form that contains the settings. OL checks the PF, and uses the administrator-controlled settings to derive a customized Level-1 and Level-2 list. ** Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE ** Manager, Network Services ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** -Original Message-From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers ok, i will bite. do you setup the public folder to recieve the messages? how does that work??? Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville 410-869-1141 -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers If you're using Exchange, you can. Read the whitepaper on the file blocking features and it tells you how to set up a public folder that will let you restrict based on username. You can also muck with the Registry in 2002, but we've just used the PF. ** Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE ** Manager, Network Services ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message No you don't. Search for it on Technet. It has to do with setting up a Form that every client checks when they log on to their mailbox. This form specifies which attachments are allowed and not allowed. But really, look for it on Technet. It explains this in great detail. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Blockers ok, i will bite. do you setup the public folder to recieve the messages? how does that work??? Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville 410-869-1141 -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Blockers If you're using Exchange, you can. Read the whitepaper on the file blocking features and it tells you how to set up a public folder that will let you restrict based on username. You can also muck with the Registry in 2002, but we've just used the PF. * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Manager, Network Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message Very good point, I've always applied "Whats good for the goose is good for the gander", my mailbox limits, etc etc are exactly the same as any user, that way no one can accuse me of placing unneccessary restrictions on them, this includes firewall setting etc.. Later Brent -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 11 April 2002 04:11To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers I'm curious as to what "as an admin" that you need access to those files. First off, every one of the ext you named (perhaps short of .ASP), should be blocked at the Exchange server for everyone. Second, "as an admin", you should be aware that there are much better ways to move those types of files, such as FTP. Don't think yourself above your users. I have come close to making some huge mistakes by making that assumption. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Norton Gateway 2.5
Let's not get started on Fish Tacos. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 well! I'm a meat and potatoes man myself, but a little fish does no harm... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 03:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Norton Gateway 2.5 What kind of produce. I'm more into veggies than fruit. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Norton Gateway 2.5 Has anyone had any experience with this produce. If so, any comparisons on how it compares to Anti Gen? Thanks Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Anyone seen this before?
Ive had this come up 3 time now, (over about 4 months) each time I simply restart the MTA and its OK again.. anyone shed some light? E2K sp2 and the HDD has about 30 gigs free so I suspect an error in the actual disk checking component.. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Field Engineering Event ID: 9411 Date: 4/9/2002 Time: 9:38:48 AM User: N/A Computer: CPTSERVER01 Description: The MTA is terminating because the disk where MTADATA is located has less than 10MB of space, or an error occurred while trying to check for free space on the disk. If disk space is low, free up some disk space and restart the MTA. Windows 2000 Error code returned: 0 (non-zero indicates an error while checking for free space) [BASE IL TIMER 3] (16) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message use the outlook security forms -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Notes to Exchange Distribution lists
Does anyone know an easy way of getting Notes Domino R5 distribution lists in to Exchange 2000? It doesn't look that easy... Thanks, Darrin List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?
Title: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? What is ExMerge? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message You are right, you don't know. I deal extensively with bat files and self executing zip files quite regularly, especially on an internal basis. Problem is, Outlook handles internal attachments the same as Internet based attachments (another downside to Outlook). This is not a matter of being "above" anyone. -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Blockers Very good point, I've always applied Whats good for the goose is good for the gander, my mailbox limits, etc etc are exactly the same as any user, that way no one can accuse me of placing unneccessary restrictions on them, this includes firewall setting etc.. Later Brent -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 04:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Blockers I'm curious as to what as an admin that you need access to those files. First off, every one of the ext you named (perhaps short of .ASP), should be blocked at the Exchange server for everyone. Second, as an admin, you should be aware that there are much better ways to move those types of files, such as FTP. Don't think yourself above your users. I have come close to making some huge mistakes by making that assumption. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message If it is internal, why email them at all? Put em on a server and connect. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:10 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers You are right, you don't know. I deal extensively with bat files and self executing zip files quite regularly, especially on an internal basis. Problem is, Outlook handles internal attachments the same as Internet based attachments (another downside to Outlook). This is not a matter of being "above" anyone. -Original Message-From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers Very good point, I've always applied "Whats good for the goose is good for the gander", my mailbox limits, etc etc are exactly the same as any user, that way no one can accuse me of placing unneccessary restrictions on them, this includes firewall setting etc.. Later Brent -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 11 April 2002 04:11To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers I'm curious as to what "as an admin" that you need access to those files. First off, every one of the ext you named (perhaps short of .ASP), should be blocked at the Exchange server for everyone. Second, "as an admin", you should be aware that there are much better ways to move those types of files, such as FTP. Don't think yourself above your users. I have come close to making some huge mistakes by making that assumption. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message Forget it. Thanks everyone who helped -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Blockers If it is internal, why email them at all? Put em on a server and connect. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Blockers You are right, you don't know. I deal extensively with bat files and self executing zip files quite regularly, especially on an internal basis. Problem is, Outlook handles internal attachments the same as Internet based attachments (another downside to Outlook). This is not a matter of being above anyone. -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Blockers Very good point, I've always applied Whats good for the goose is good for the gander, my mailbox limits, etc etc are exactly the same as any user, that way no one can accuse me of placing unneccessary restrictions on them, this includes firewall setting etc.. Later Brent -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 04:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Blockers I'm curious as to what as an admin that you need access to those files. First off, every one of the ext you named (perhaps short of .ASP), should be blocked at the Exchange server for everyone. Second, as an admin, you should be aware that there are much better ways to move those types of files, such as FTP. Don't think yourself above your users. I have come close to making some huge mistakes by making that assumption. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? (ridicu lous)
Title: Message Affirmative. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? (ridicu lous) SO you advocate having AV on your Exchange server? Just want to clarify your earlier statement... Don ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? (ridicu lous) 1. Laptops A) I have Users who sneak in laptops from home (non-corporate), they are intelligent enough to connect to the exchange servers. I would hate to see one of these people bring their world of home viruses onto my Exchange server. B) My AV solution on "roaming" laptops is not perfect yet, when I have people out on the road a while, they seem to pick up viruses now and then. When they come back, or VPN or dial-up to the network, they are able to spread their crap. 2. Internal Desktops: A) In a perfect world, all the desktops are completely protected at a local level. But my experience has been that the local PC AV solutions are less then perfect. Again, I am afraid of Users bringing their crap in from home on floppy's and CD-ROMS. 3. Remote Desktops A) Home users using their own PC connected via VPN. These people are directly connected to the LAN and are directly connecting to the Exchange server. I have no control of the garbage on their PC's. I guess my primary concern is internal havoc. I am scared about people spreading things internally, example: 1. "Killer Virus" comes out. 2. The Firewall updates itself and begins protecting inbound SMTP 3. Luser at home gets infected from private Email 4. Connects to network via VPN, or Direct Dial to RAS Server. 5. Luser begins spreading "Killer Virus" via the Exchange server. 6. Internal Users begin suffering from this attack. (Deleted files? Corrupted MBR?ect. ect. ect.) 7. Exmerge is not going to help. Depending on your environment, this scenario may not be applicable to you, so perhaps I jumped the gun by saying "ridiculous". -Original Message-From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Hi, here is a target on my head, beat me, beat me. DOH! -Original Message-From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 1:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Do you have anything more to add to back up your statement? Matt -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? I think it's ridiculous. -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Our environment has Trend running on the firewall for anti-virus and content filtering. We have NAV running on the desktops. We are currently evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put on our E2K Exchange servers (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN). However, our Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and instability (particularly Symantec's product). He said that when a virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside, a quick ExMerge on the server is just as effective as pushing out virus defs using the AV product. With AV software on the firewall and on the desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the Exchange servers themselves? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ
Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000
Hello, In Exchange 5.5 I could have one domain mapped to another, so username@domaina.com would automatically go to username@domainb.com, without having to add the second domain to everyone's SMTP email address. Very useful when the company wanted all of their domains to work for inbound email and also meant I didn't have to modify every account each time a new one was bought. However despite lots of research I can't seem to find that feature on Exchange 2000. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks, Simon Butler. -- Simon Butler, SysAdmin Radiant Real-Time, Bracknell, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)1344 742802 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000
Just curios: how did you achieve this in 5.5 without adding additional SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Hello, In Exchange 5.5 I could have one domain mapped to another, so username@domaina.com would automatically go to username@domainb.com, without having to add the second domain to everyone's SMTP email address. Very useful when the company wanted all of their domains to work for inbound email and also meant I didn't have to modify every account each time a new one was bought. However despite lots of research I can't seem to find that feature on Exchange 2000. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks, Simon Butler. -- Simon Butler, SysAdmin Radiant Real-Time, Bracknell, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)1344 742802 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
AW: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000
With Rerouting it had been possible... Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. April 2002 18:48 An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Betreff: RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Just curios: how did you achieve this in 5.5 without adding additional SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Hello, In Exchange 5.5 I could have one domain mapped to another, so username@domaina.com would automatically go to username@domainb.com, without having to add the second domain to everyone's SMTP email address. Very useful when the company wanted all of their domains to work for inbound email and also meant I didn't have to modify every account each time a new one was bought. However despite lots of research I can't seem to find that feature on Exchange 2000. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks, Simon Butler. -- Simon Butler, SysAdmin Radiant Real-Time, Bracknell, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)1344 742802 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?
Title: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q174197 William -Original Message-From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? What is ExMerge? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Anyone seen this before?
Also check the pagefile limitations. (yes, seriously) And MDBDATA if on another drive/partition. William -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Anyone seen this before? Ive had this come up 3 time now, (over about 4 months) each time I simply restart the MTA and its OK again.. anyone shed some light? E2K sp2 and the HDD has about 30 gigs free so I suspect an error in the actual disk checking component.. Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Field Engineering Event ID: 9411 Date: 4/9/2002 Time: 9:38:48 AM User: N/A Computer: CPTSERVER01 Description: The MTA is terminating because the disk where MTADATA is located has less than 10MB of space, or an error occurred while trying to check for free space on the disk. If disk space is low, free up some disk space and restart the MTA. Windows 2000 Error code returned: 0 (non-zero indicates an error while checking for free space) [BASE IL TIMER 3] (16) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
Antivirus problems. -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
You probably missed this easier migration method: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm The Exmerge process will toast Single Instance Storage, but you have a beefy machine. I would look at antivirus perhaps as a potential culprit? Was the old Exchange server properly removed per Q152959? William -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000
That was easy. In Exchange admin, Connections, IMS, on the routing tab I enabled Reroute incoming SMTP mail Then by pressing Add I entered the domain, and chose the option Should be rerouted to this domain and entered the primary domain that I use for all email. I had about thirty domains on one server all routing this way. This works for inbound only. I found it very useful as we kept acquiring domains and I was able to ensure to management that the domains would work for inbound. If a certain user needed to send email with a different domain from the primary (different project or division) I could change it manually. If I could do this for Exchange 2000 without having to enter individual addresses to each user for each domain then I would be very happy. Hope this helps, Simon. -Original Message- From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 11 April 2002 17:48 Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Just curios: how did you achieve this in 5.5 without adding additional SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Hello, In Exchange 5.5 I could have one domain mapped to another, so username@domaina.com would automatically go to username@domainb.com, without having to add the second domain to everyone's SMTP email address. Very useful when the company wanted all of their domains to work for inbound email and also meant I didn't have to modify every account each time a new one was bought. However despite lots of research I can't seem to find that feature on Exchange 2000. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks, Simon Butler. -- Simon Butler, SysAdmin Radiant Real-Time, Bracknell, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)1344 742802 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
exceeded storage allocation
A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000
Users still would need the secondary-proxy-address with that second domain in order to receive email. In Exchange2000, the process is similar. You can use Recipient Policies to control this. http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q319201 William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 That was easy. In Exchange admin, Connections, IMS, on the routing tab I enabled Reroute incoming SMTP mail Then by pressing Add I entered the domain, and chose the option Should be rerouted to this domain and entered the primary domain that I use for all email. I had about thirty domains on one server all routing this way. This works for inbound only. I found it very useful as we kept acquiring domains and I was able to ensure to management that the domains would work for inbound. If a certain user needed to send email with a different domain from the primary (different project or division) I could change it manually. If I could do this for Exchange 2000 without having to enter individual addresses to each user for each domain then I would be very happy. Hope this helps, Simon. -Original Message- From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 11 April 2002 17:48 Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Just curios: how did you achieve this in 5.5 without adding additional SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Hello, In Exchange 5.5 I could have one domain mapped to another, so username@domaina.com would automatically go to username@domainb.com, without having to add the second domain to everyone's SMTP email address. Very useful when the company wanted all of their domains to work for inbound email and also meant I didn't have to modify every account each time a new one was bought. However despite lots of research I can't seem to find that feature on Exchange 2000. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks, Simon Butler. -- Simon Butler, SysAdmin Radiant Real-Time, Bracknell, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)1344 742802 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Why do you insist on hacking the registry, when a simple edit will suffice? -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers go to www.slipstick.com. I think there is a reghack. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
Never saw that before. Excellent... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
exmerge
Title: exmerge Ok guys and girls, After a long search on Microsoft, TechNet, support etc I found out that the ExMerge.exe tool and documentation are available on the Exchange 2000 compact disc in the following folder: SUPPORT\UTILS\I386\EXMERGE. BUT I do not have Exchange 2000 I am running Exchange 5.5, I did a search on the CD but to no avail ? Any idea where I can find this tool and please don't say buy a version of Exchange 2000. Regards Mike C List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exmerge
Title: exmerge This version will work if Exhange5.5 is on Windows2000, I believe. -Original Message-From: Mike Channon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: exmerge Ok guys and girls, After a long search on Microsoft, TechNet, support etc I found out that the ExMerge.exe tool and documentation are available on the Exchange 2000 compact disc in the following folder: SUPPORT\UTILS\I386\EXMERGE. BUT I do not have Exchange 2000 I am running Exchange 5.5, I did a search on the CD but to no avail ? Any idea where I can find this tool and please don't say buy a version of Exchange 2000. Regards Mike C List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
I'm a BFD -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. That's why you're not an MVP. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Never saw that before. Excellent... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
That would make you a CAT. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Meow. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. That's why you're not an MVP. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Never saw that before. Excellent... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000
I thought you'd still have to add additional email to every user's SMTP address for rerouted domain: ie, route all @abc.com to @xyz.com so I'd have to add additional SMTP address for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to already existing [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP address.. Unless you forward everything over to sendmail box and setup aliases on it.. Dimitri -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 That was easy. In Exchange admin, Connections, IMS, on the routing tab I enabled Reroute incoming SMTP mail Then by pressing Add I entered the domain, and chose the option Should be rerouted to this domain and entered the primary domain that I use for all email. I had about thirty domains on one server all routing this way. This works for inbound only. I found it very useful as we kept acquiring domains and I was able to ensure to management that the domains would work for inbound. If a certain user needed to send email with a different domain from the primary (different project or division) I could change it manually. If I could do this for Exchange 2000 without having to enter individual addresses to each user for each domain then I would be very happy. Hope this helps, Simon. -Original Message- From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 11 April 2002 17:48 Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Subject: RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Just curios: how did you achieve this in 5.5 without adding additional SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000 Hello, In Exchange 5.5 I could have one domain mapped to another, so username@domaina.com would automatically go to username@domainb.com, without having to add the second domain to everyone's SMTP email address. Very useful when the company wanted all of their domains to work for inbound email and also meant I didn't have to modify every account each time a new one was bought. However despite lots of research I can't seem to find that feature on Exchange 2000. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks, Simon Butler. -- Simon Butler, SysAdmin Radiant Real-Time, Bracknell, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)1344 742802 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exmerge
Title: exmerge You can also get it out of the service pack I believe under /support/tools... copy the exmerge files to your exchange/bin dir -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:54 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: exmerge This version will work if Exhange5.5 is on Windows2000, I believe. -Original Message-From: Mike Channon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: exmerge Ok guys and girls, After a long search on Microsoft, TechNet, support etc I found out that the ExMerge.exe tool and documentation are available on the Exchange 2000 compact disc in the following folder: SUPPORT\UTILS\I386\EXMERGE. BUT I do not have Exchange 2000 I am running Exchange 5.5, I did a search on the CD but to no avail ? Any idea where I can find this tool and please don't say buy a version of Exchange 2000. Regards Mike C List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
I would crank up logging and test with that user. Did you see the error? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
Below is one of the messages. As far as logging, I am not sure what to even turn up. The original message was received at Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:16:45 -0400 (EDT) from root@localhost *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: - Transcript of Session Follows -. The line beginning with describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail administrator or Postmaster at that destination. --AOL Postmaster - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to smtp.rsrmedia.com.: DATA 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.rsrmedia.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:17:04 -0400 (EDT) Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.rsrmedia.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:17:04 -0400 (EDT) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation I would crank up logging and test with that user. Did you see the error? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? Kevan Dickinson Network Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company No: 3554809 * This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
Running Optimizer didn't make a difference. This box is running Scan Mail 3.51 eManager 3.1, Exchange 5.5 sp4. This is the same box that won't accept email from 2 until 5 am every night ... I am having a wonderful day. :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I don't think name resolution discriminates by the presence of an attachment. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good point Steve, we've seen that bite us here. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. DNS Resolution issues? (Long shot, but what the heck) -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
Please upgrade to 3.8 ScanMail immediately! 3.51 has problems with blocking attachments. You do not have to uninstall 3.51, the 3.8 install with retain your setting and take care of that for you. Tom -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Running Optimizer didn't make a difference. This box is running Scan Mail 3.51 eManager 3.1, Exchange 5.5 sp4. This is the same box that won't accept email from 2 until 5 am every night ... I am having a wonderful day. :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I don't think name resolution discriminates by the presence of an attachment. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good point Steve, we've seen that bite us here. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. DNS Resolution issues? (Long shot, but what the heck) -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
TCPee IPee? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Any other protocols on the network? NetScrewy or NWStink? -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Running Optimizer didn't make a difference. This box is running Scan Mail 3.51 eManager 3.1, Exchange 5.5 sp4. This is the same box that won't accept email from 2 until 5 am every night ... I am having a wonderful day. :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I don't think name resolution discriminates by the presence of an attachment. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good point Steve, we've seen that bite us here. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. DNS Resolution issues? (Long shot, but what the heck) -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
I was thinking the same thing -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Please upgrade to 3.8 ScanMail immediately! 3.51 has problems with blocking attachments. You do not have to uninstall 3.51, the 3.8 install with retain your setting and take care of that for you. Tom -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Running Optimizer didn't make a difference. This box is running Scan Mail 3.51 eManager 3.1, Exchange 5.5 sp4. This is the same box that won't accept email from 2 until 5 am every night ... I am having a wonderful day. :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I don't think name resolution discriminates by the presence of an attachment. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good point Steve, we've seen that bite us here. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. DNS Resolution issues? (Long shot, but what the heck) -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
Title: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Now now...no one stinks here. You are obviously not on the WINNT list are you. lol -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Any other protocols on the network? NetScrewy or NWStink? -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Running Optimizer didn't make a difference. This box is running Scan Mail 3.51 eManager 3.1, Exchange 5.5 sp4. This is the same box that won't accept email from 2 until 5 am every night ... I am having a wonderful day. :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I don't think name resolution discriminates by the presence of an attachment. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good point Steve, we've seen that bite us here. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. DNS Resolution issues? (Long shot, but what the heck) -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz Processor 34GB hard drive. It much more powerful than the old box. I exported all users mail to PST's and then imported them back into the new set up after pointing their Outlook clients at the new Exchange Server. Our domain environment is still NT4 although we now have 3 Win 2k Servers doing various jobs. All the clients are outlook 2000 on win 2k Pro. However all users are experiencing difficulty sending email with attachments both internal and external. It takes 20 seconds to a couple of mins to send a mail with an attachment. What have I missed during my migration?? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: exceeded storage allocation
Is there a policy in place for mailbox limits? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
Do you get the same error when sent from an ISP other than AOL? You know, to rule out the biggest variable in this case. :) -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Below is one of the messages. As far as logging, I am not sure what to even turn up. The original message was received at Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:16:45 -0400 (EDT) from root@localhost *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: - Transcript of Session Follows -. The line beginning with describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail administrator or Postmaster at that destination. --AOL Postmaster - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to smtp.rsrmedia.com.: DATA 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.rsrmedia.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:17:04 -0400 (EDT) Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.rsrmedia.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:17:04 -0400 (EDT) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation I would crank up logging and test with that user. Did you see the error? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
Re: exmerge
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, at 6:47pm, Mike Channon wrote: BUT I do not have Exchange 2000 I am running Exchange 5.5, I did a search on the CD but to no avail ? Any idea where I can find this tool and please don't say buy a version of Exchange 2000. Buy a version of Exchange 2000. Sorry, couldn't resist. ;-) Seriously, search the MS KB for the tool used to recovery from mass-mailing worms. I think it was called wormhelp or wormtool. It contains a reasonably current release of ExMerge for Exchange 5.5 as part of the package. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
Yes. From numerous nonAOL servers. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Do you get the same error when sent from an ISP other than AOL? You know, to rule out the biggest variable in this case. :) -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Below is one of the messages. As far as logging, I am not sure what to even turn up. The original message was received at Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:16:45 -0400 (EDT) from root@localhost *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: - Transcript of Session Follows -. The line beginning with describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail administrator or Postmaster at that destination. --AOL Postmaster - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to smtp.rsrmedia.com.: DATA 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.rsrmedia.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:17:04 -0400 (EDT) Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.rsrmedia.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:17:04 -0400 (EDT) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation I would crank up logging and test with that user. Did you see the error? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: exceeded storage allocation
Where would an Exchange policy be set? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Is there a policy in place for mailbox limits? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message I hack remote registry's.. ;o) Don ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers Why do you insist on hacking the registry, when a simple edit will suffice? -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers go to www.slipstick.com. I think there is a reghack. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
Well I doubt this is the case, but: http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q319130 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q256141 -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Where would an Exchange policy be set? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Is there a policy in place for mailbox limits? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
E-mail policy
Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Hide the Fax entry in Outlook 2002
Darin, Im having the same problem with one installation. Its an ex5.5sp4 site but it does have a fax connector on the server which Im considering deleting, since they don't use it to see if that helps, but I havent been able to find any help anywhere on this one.. What I end up with is a real long address book view of Name, Display Name, email name, and type smtp/fax. So I get a list of 2-3 entries for every user and have to slide over to see which one it is. Very annoying.. -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Hide the Fax entry in Outlook 2002 Hi, Is is possible to create a message and when you are using a public contacts list as an address book not have the stupid fax entry show up? Thanks, Darrin List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This is a disclaimer.. and we disclaim anything that gets us in trouble. -Advanced PC List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
A god policy - that's a pretty high standard don't you think? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Thou shalt not spam. Thou shalt not do anything to get the mail admin in trouble. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Title: RE: E-mail policy Concerning what? Mailing lists? Storage limits? Personal usage? Attachments? -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Title: RE: E-mail policy LMAO -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy A god policy - that's a pretty high standard don't you think? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
I do not have any Exchange policies defined. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Well I doubt this is the case, but: http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q319130 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q256141 -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Where would an Exchange policy be set? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Is there a policy in place for mailbox limits? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Title: Message Seriously guys why reinvent the wheel, I need to have a policy for: - Personal usage - Storage limits - File size limits -Acceptable language. Stefan Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 15:22To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Concerning what? Mailing lists? Storage limits? Personal usage? Attachments? -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Well spelling has never been on of my strong points, however English is my second language. I could type in Swedish, however I may not get a good repose! Stefan Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy A god policy - that's a pretty high standard don't you think? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exmerge
Be careful when you get the worm removal version. There are certain options that are set to remove the worm via the subject line, attachment type or size. You can install anywhere. You will have to have full admin rights to the Exchange server. I would suggest installing it where you have lots of disk space(exchange private database area) under an exmerge directory. I can email you a copy version 3.71 that I use on an Ex5.5 server. Mike Hoskins -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: exmerge On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, at 6:47pm, Mike Channon wrote: BUT I do not have Exchange 2000 I am running Exchange 5.5, I did a search on the CD but to no avail ? Any idea where I can find this tool and please don't say buy a version of Exchange 2000. Buy a version of Exchange 2000. Sorry, couldn't resist. ;-) Seriously, search the MS KB for the tool used to recovery from mass-mailing worms. I think it was called wormhelp or wormtool. It contains a reasonably current release of ExMerge for Exchange 5.5 as part of the package. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
I have the mailbox limit set to notify at 150 Meg and stop at 300 I think. SJ Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 14:50 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Is there a policy in place for mailbox limits? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
No but I could modify it. SJ Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy My company policy is not necessarily good for your company. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Email Policy templates: http://www.cli.org/emailpolicy/assemble.html http://www.sans.org/newlook/resources/policies/policies.htm http://www.elronsoftware.com/template.html William -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
H. Their white paper says that anything newer than v3 does not need to be uninstalled. This doesn't surprise me. Did this fix the problem? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. When I did the upgrade from ScanMail 3.51 to 3.8 I ended up having to uninstall all the ScanMail products before doing the install for 3.8. Make sure you save your attachment blocking list to a text file before doing any updates or uninstalls. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Please upgrade to 3.8 ScanMail immediately! 3.51 has problems with blocking attachments. You do not have to uninstall 3.51, the 3.8 install with retain your setting and take care of that for you. Tom -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Running Optimizer didn't make a difference. This box is running Scan Mail 3.51 eManager 3.1, Exchange 5.5 sp4. This is the same box that won't accept email from 2 until 5 am every night ... I am having a wonderful day. :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I don't think name resolution discriminates by the presence of an attachment. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good point Steve, we've seen that bite us here. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. DNS Resolution issues? (Long shot, but what the heck) -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run
RE: E-mail policy
In the majority of small shops I handle - the rule is very clear. The email system is for company business, only, period, no exceptions. Oh wait, the owners do whatever they want. No one stores an excessive amount of mail so there haven't been any issues. As long as I keep any eye on the storage size and the owners police their employees - no problems. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy Well spelling has never been on of my strong points, however English is my second language. I could type in Swedish, however I may not get a good repose! Stefan Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 15:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy A god policy - that's a pretty high standard don't you think? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
When I did the upgrade from ScanMail 3.51 to 3.8 I ended up having to uninstall all the ScanMail products before doing the install for 3.8. Make sure you save your attachment blocking list to a text file before doing any updates or uninstalls. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Please upgrade to 3.8 ScanMail immediately! 3.51 has problems with blocking attachments. You do not have to uninstall 3.51, the 3.8 install with retain your setting and take care of that for you. Tom -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Running Optimizer didn't make a difference. This box is running Scan Mail 3.51 eManager 3.1, Exchange 5.5 sp4. This is the same box that won't accept email from 2 until 5 am every night ... I am having a wonderful day. :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I don't think name resolution discriminates by the presence of an attachment. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good point Steve, we've seen that bite us here. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. DNS Resolution issues? (Long shot, but what the heck) -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Can you explain why the optimizer would make a difference. I thought it only went on number of mailboxes? Is it smart enough to look at current sizes and allocate resources based on that data. Just wondering for future reference. Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good call. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Did you run the Exch optimizer after importing all that mail? -Original Message- From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Last Weekend I installed a new Exchange 5.5 sp4 Server on a win 2K sp2 Compaq Server. 778mb ram 1.2 Ghz
RE: E-mail policy
Title: Message It depends on your org needs. If I have a 100 MB mailbox limit, that may be too low for you. Acceptable language?? Use common sense. How do you plan to monitor that anyway? File size limits? Depends on your servers capabilities and bandwidth. Personal Usage? How do you plan to monitor that? -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy Seriously guys why reinvent the wheel, I need to have a policy for: - Personal usage - Storage limits - File size limits -Acceptable language. Stefan Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 15:22 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy Concerning what? Mailing lists? Storage limits? Personal usage? Attachments? -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 move method
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q152/9/59.asp Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 move method I have 2 Exchange 5.5 servers in a site. I have moved all the mailboxes from server A to B. Now I want to kill server A. Is there any document which tells how to decommission the Exchange server/connectors. I have checked http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm Please let me know if there is any other resource you may know. Thanks Anwar List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Moving users from server A to Server B
Hi all, Were in the process of relocating users from one server to another. Is there an easy way to change the server the users connect to within outlook for 150 users? Can this be done from a logon script. Most of the clients are Win95, The Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 SP2. Any advice appreciated Stu List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: exceeded storage allocation
Do you have an NDR from a non-aol mailbox? Any relay in between? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation I do not have any Exchange policies defined. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Well I doubt this is the case, but: http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q319130 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q256141 -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Where would an Exchange policy be set? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Is there a policy in place for mailbox limits? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation On the store, nothing is checked and there are no values. On the users, they are set to use mailbox store defaults. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation The limit is controlled at multiple levels. Double check the settings on the store (Exchange System Manager) Double check the settings on the user (AD Users and Computers - Exchange General tab, Storage Limits button) William -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Sorry. Exchange 2000 with the latest sp. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: exceeded storage allocation Version? -Original Message- From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exceeded storage allocation A while back someone called me and told me that they could not send me email because my personal mailbox was full. I tested it and sure enough, that was what my server was reporting. I have never set any limits. I looked all over and could not find that one of our other administrators set a limit anywhere. I cleaned up my mailbox and the problem (symptom) went away. No one else in the organization was complaining so I did not worry about it. Today, two other users started having the same problem. They are in the same mailbox store (my mailbox is in a different store in a different storage group on the same server). One users mailbox currently has 508MB of mail and the other user 139MB. Any idea what might be up? Larry Penrod Sr. Network Administrator Barkley Evergreen Partners 423 W 8th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 816-512-9422 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 move method
The answer is in the page you included in your message. KB Article Q152959 from memory. -Original Message- From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 move method I have 2 Exchange 5.5 servers in a site. I have moved all the mailboxes from server A to B. Now I want to kill server A. Is there any document which tells how to decommission the Exchange server/connectors. I have checked http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm Please let me know if there is any other resource you may know. Thanks Anwar List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Title: Message Hey guys... I need a server configured over here. Anyone have a good config I could use? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy It depends on your org needs. If I have a 100 MB mailbox limit, that may be too low for you. Acceptable language?? Use common sense. How do you plan to monitor that anyway? File size limits? Depends on your servers capabilities and bandwidth. Personal Usage? How do you plan to monitor that? -Original Message-From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Seriously guys why reinvent the wheel, I need to have a policy for: - Personal usage - Storage limits - File size limits -Acceptable language. Stefan Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 15:22To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Concerning what? Mailing lists? Storage limits? Personal usage? Attachments? -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
It allowed me to install version 3.8 without the server coughing up hairballs. It also dropped resource utilization a bit. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. H. Their white paper says that anything newer than v3 does not need to be uninstalled. This doesn't surprise me. Did this fix the problem? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. When I did the upgrade from ScanMail 3.51 to 3.8 I ended up having to uninstall all the ScanMail products before doing the install for 3.8. Make sure you save your attachment blocking list to a text file before doing any updates or uninstalls. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Please upgrade to 3.8 ScanMail immediately! 3.51 has problems with blocking attachments. You do not have to uninstall 3.51, the 3.8 install with retain your setting and take care of that for you. Tom -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Running Optimizer didn't make a difference. This box is running Scan Mail 3.51 eManager 3.1, Exchange 5.5 sp4. This is the same box that won't accept email from 2 until 5 am every night ... I am having a wonderful day. :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I don't think name resolution discriminates by the presence of an attachment. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good point Steve, we've seen that bite us here. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. DNS Resolution issues? (Long shot, but what the heck) -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It does a lot. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266051 William -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:
RE: Moving users from server A to Server B
If both servers are up and you used a mailbox move method that did not require recreation of the mailbox, and assuming the users connect via MAPI, then their profile is updated upon first login after the mailbox move. Other than that, profgen and others will do this for you. William -Original Message-From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Moving users from server A to Server B Hi all, Were in the process of relocating users from one server to another. Is there an easy way to change the server the users connect to within outlook for 150 users? Can this be done from a logon script. Most of the clients are Win95, The Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 SP2. Any advice appreciated Stu List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Title: Message Damm Jafs, you are getting slammed. (but that is TOO funny) -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy Hey guys... I need a server configured over here. Anyone have a good config I could use? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy It depends on your org needs. If I have a 100 MB mailbox limit, that may be too low for you. Acceptable language?? Use common sense. How do you plan to monitor that anyway? File size limits? Depends on your servers capabilities and bandwidth. Personal Usage? How do you plan to monitor that? -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy Seriously guys why reinvent the wheel, I need to have a policy for: - Personal usage - Storage limits - File size limits -Acceptable language. Stefan Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 15:22 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E-mail policy Concerning what? Mailing lists? Storage limits? Personal usage? Attachments? -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving users from server A to Server B
On a related note... www.scriptlogic.com We use it here and find it to be a major life savor in a lot of circumstances. Preston JeffaresNetwork EngineerGeorgia Department of Motor Vehicle Safety[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Moving users from server A to Server B Hi all, Were in the process of relocating users from one server to another. Is there an easy way to change the server the users connect to within outlook for 150 users? Can this be done from a logon script. Most of the clients are Win95, The Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 SP2. Any advice appreciated Stu List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Title: Message Could someone tell me how to service my wife. -Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Hey guys... I need a server configured over here. Anyone have a good config I could use? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy It depends on your org needs. If I have a 100 MB mailbox limit, that may be too low for you. Acceptable language?? Use common sense. How do you plan to monitor that anyway? File size limits? Depends on your servers capabilities and bandwidth. Personal Usage? How do you plan to monitor that? -Original Message-From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Seriously guys why reinvent the wheel, I need to have a policy for: - Personal usage - Storage limits - File size limits -Acceptable language. Stefan Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 15:22To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Concerning what? Mailing lists? Storage limits? Personal usage? Attachments? -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving users from server A to Server B
Well... if you bring the 2nd server up in the site... and leave the the 1st server up. Exchangewill automatically update the user's mapi profile. Some users may have to open, close, and then reopen their client to reconnect to the proper server. Once everyone is over you can drop the first server. -Original Message-From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Moving users from server A to Server B Hi all, Were in the process of relocating users from one server to another. Is there an easy way to change the server the users connect to within outlook for 150 users? Can this be done from a logon script. Most of the clients are Win95, The Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 SP2. Any advice appreciated Stu List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: E-mail policy
Title: Message Wrong list for that. You want Gigolo-list@yahoogroups.com John Matteson; Exchange ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message-From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Could someone tell me how to service my wife. -Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:43 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Hey guys... I need a server configured over here. Anyone have a good config I could use? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy It depends on your org needs. If I have a 100 MB mailbox limit, that may be too low for you. Acceptable language?? Use common sense. How do you plan to monitor that anyway? File size limits? Depends on your servers capabilities and bandwidth. Personal Usage? How do you plan to monitor that? -Original Message-From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Seriously guys why reinvent the wheel, I need to have a policy for: - Personal usage - Storage limits - File size limits -Acceptable language. Stefan Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 15:22To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: E-mail policy Concerning what? Mailing lists? Storage limits? Personal usage? Attachments? -Original Message- From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E-mail policy Does any one have a god e-mail policy I could use for my Company Policy Manual? Stefan Jafs Amico Corporation www.amico.com 1-877-GO-AMICO List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments.
I will have to check it out I remember deciding to not upgrade to 3.6? or 3.7 because the emanager was no longer supported. Bob F. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. It allowed me to install version 3.8 without the server coughing up hairballs. It also dropped resource utilization a bit. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. H. Their white paper says that anything newer than v3 does not need to be uninstalled. This doesn't surprise me. Did this fix the problem? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. When I did the upgrade from ScanMail 3.51 to 3.8 I ended up having to uninstall all the ScanMail products before doing the install for 3.8. Make sure you save your attachment blocking list to a text file before doing any updates or uninstalls. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Please upgrade to 3.8 ScanMail immediately! 3.51 has problems with blocking attachments. You do not have to uninstall 3.51, the 3.8 install with retain your setting and take care of that for you. Tom -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Running Optimizer didn't make a difference. This box is running Scan Mail 3.51 eManager 3.1, Exchange 5.5 sp4. This is the same box that won't accept email from 2 until 5 am every night ... I am having a wonderful day. :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I don't think name resolution discriminates by the presence of an attachment. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. Good point Steve, we've seen that bite us here. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. DNS Resolution issues? (Long shot, but what the heck) -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I ran Optimizer has as the guys suggested and saw no changes. If you believe it and I can't tell you why this is making a difference but releasing an renewing the IP address on the Outlook Client PC fixes the slow down. I have people with 30 second lag in calendar that disappears when they do this. Needless to say its driving me nuts. Bob F. -Original Message- From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook very slow sending messages with attachments. I disagree, show me where it says anything about database size or mailbox size? I understand the logic if you run optimizer and set it for 26-50 users and you exmerged 60 users. Running it then may give you something. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:41 PM
RE: Moving users from server A to Server B
Title: Message Bring up the new server, move the mailboxes. Add a DNS entry with the old server's name and the new server's IP address. Seems a bit strange, but it works... -Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving users from server A to Server B Well... if you bring the 2nd server up in the site... and leave the the 1st server up. Exchangewill automatically update the user's mapi profile. Some users may have to open, close, and then reopen their client to reconnect to the proper server. Once everyone is over you can drop the first server. -Original Message-From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:17 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Moving users from server A to Server B Hi all, Were in the process of relocating users from one server to another. Is there an easy way to change the server the users connect to within outlook for 150 users? Can this be done from a logon script. Most of the clients are Win95, The Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 SP2. Any advice appreciated Stu List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
