Re: OT - Windows Server 2003 R2 POP Server

2008-09-11 Thread Steven Peck
Mail Enable
http://www.mailenable.com/

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Michael B. Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xmailserver, hmailserver, and smartermail all have free versions of their
> packages that support pop3.
>
>
>
> I can't remember the user counts that come into play though.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
>
> From: Jason Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 4:11 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: OT - Windows Server 2003 R2 POP Server
>
>
>
> Sorry for the OT. I have a small client that has SBS 2003 R2.  They have the
> need to host about 200 POP mailboxes for their members, but this would
> obviously violate the SBS licensing agreement.
>
>
>
> So, my thought is the built in Windows Server 2003 POP Server (they have
> another server on their LAN).  Does anyone know how many users this service
> supports?  Also, does using this in a Local File authentication method
> require CALs?
>
>
>
> Any other suggestions for low cost/no cost POP3 server solutions that run on
> Windows?
>
>
>
> Jason Tierney, MCSE
>
> Vice President, Consulting Services
>
> tel: 240.425.4441
>
> fax: 301.349.2518
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

2008-09-11 Thread Kennedy, Jim

You will learn to hate making accounts. Scripting is not a replacement for 
right click copy, set the password and fire them an email to initiate the 
mailbox. And don't get me started on having to fire a powershell command to 
give myself and the backup account permissions on every new mailbox, instead of 
a store inheriting them.

I really hope I missed something on the permissions issue and someone sets me 
straight.



From: Matt Plahtinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 ADUC

I just started playing with Exchange 2007 today.  I'm hoping that I messed 
something up.   PLEASE tell me that Microsoft didn't take mailbox 
management/exchange attributes out of ADUC.  Did I do something wrong.   I can 
only manage exchange attributes from the Exchange console and not Active 
Directory User and computers.   Looks like I'm off to buy an exchange book.

Matt




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

2008-09-11 Thread John Hornbuckle
I asked the exact same question when I migrated to Exchange 2007 a few weeks 
ago. It's two steps forward and one step back.



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us




From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 ADUC

I just started playing with Exchange 2007 today.  I'm hoping that I messed 
something up.   PLEASE tell me that Microsoft didn't take mailbox 
management/exchange attributes out of ADUC.  Did I do something wrong.   I can 
only manage exchange attributes from the Exchange console and not Active 
Directory User and computers.   Looks like I'm off to buy an exchange book.

Matt



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

2008-09-11 Thread Don Andrews
Heh, in a perfect world I'd be retired instead of tired - without a HUGE
cut in income - and I would not have to use either.

-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

In a perfect world, there would be both command line and gui interfaces
for everything.

-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

[opinion on]
Having the native ability to script is good - having to script/cmd line
exceptionally occasional one off browses/changes is not.
[opinion off]

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

You are correct.

You lose something cool, exchange management in ADUC.

You gain something better, powershell and the ability to easily script
EVERYTHING in exchange, especially user management and creation.

Find a good book, I think most folks will agree the Payette and Jones
books are among the best.

-troy

-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 ADUC

I just started playing with Exchange 2007 today.  I'm hoping that I
messed something up.   PLEASE tell me that Microsoft didn't take mailbox
management/exchange attributes out of ADUC.  Did I do something wrong.
I can only manage exchange attributes from the Exchange console and not
Active Directory User and computers.   Looks like I'm off to buy an
exchange book.

Matt





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 

**


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

2008-09-11 Thread Campbell, Rob
In a perfect world, there would be both command line and gui interfaces
for everything.

-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 5:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

[opinion on]
Having the native ability to script is good - having to script/cmd line
exceptionally occasional one off browses/changes is not.
[opinion off]

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

You are correct.

You lose something cool, exchange management in ADUC.

You gain something better, powershell and the ability to easily script
EVERYTHING in exchange, especially user management and creation.

Find a good book, I think most folks will agree the Payette and Jones
books are among the best.

-troy

-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 ADUC

I just started playing with Exchange 2007 today.  I'm hoping that I
messed something up.   PLEASE tell me that Microsoft didn't take mailbox
management/exchange attributes out of ADUC.  Did I do something wrong.
I can only manage exchange attributes from the Exchange console and not
Active Directory User and computers.   Looks like I'm off to buy an
exchange book.

Matt





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

2008-09-11 Thread Michael B. Smith
You can do quite a bit in the Exchange Management Console. The situation
isn't as bad as I originally thought it was going to be.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

[opinion on]
Having the native ability to script is good - having to script/cmd line
exceptionally occasional one off browses/changes is not.
[opinion off]

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

You are correct.

You lose something cool, exchange management in ADUC.

You gain something better, powershell and the ability to easily script
EVERYTHING in exchange, especially user management and creation.

Find a good book, I think most folks will agree the Payette and Jones
books are among the best.

-troy

-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 ADUC

I just started playing with Exchange 2007 today.  I'm hoping that I
messed something up.   PLEASE tell me that Microsoft didn't take mailbox
management/exchange attributes out of ADUC.  Did I do something wrong.
I can only manage exchange attributes from the Exchange console and not
Active Directory User and computers.   Looks like I'm off to buy an
exchange book.

Matt





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

2008-09-11 Thread Don Andrews
[opinion on]
Having the native ability to script is good - having to script/cmd line
exceptionally occasional one off browses/changes is not.
[opinion off]

-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

You are correct.

You lose something cool, exchange management in ADUC.

You gain something better, powershell and the ability to easily script
EVERYTHING in exchange, especially user management and creation.

Find a good book, I think most folks will agree the Payette and Jones
books are among the best.

-troy

-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 ADUC

I just started playing with Exchange 2007 today.  I'm hoping that I
messed something up.   PLEASE tell me that Microsoft didn't take mailbox
management/exchange attributes out of ADUC.  Did I do something wrong.
I can only manage exchange attributes from the Exchange console and not
Active Directory User and computers.   Looks like I'm off to buy an
exchange book.

Matt





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

2008-09-11 Thread Tim Vander Kooi
Once you get into PowerShell you will find yourself managing those accounts 
from one place again. It will just be with PS instead of an MMC window.
Tim

From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 ADUC

Thanks.  Looking on Amazon right now.   It just seems kinda weird to have to go 
two places now to manage accounts.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Troy Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are correct.

You lose something cool, exchange management in ADUC.

You gain something better, powershell and the ability to easily script 
EVERYTHING in exchange, especially user management and creation.

Find a good book, I think most folks will agree the Payette and Jones books are 
among the best.

-troy

-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 ADUC

I just started playing with Exchange 2007 today.  I'm hoping that I messed 
something up.   PLEASE tell me that Microsoft didn't take mailbox 
management/exchange attributes out of ADUC.  Did I do something wrong.   I can 
only manage exchange attributes from the Exchange console and not Active 
Directory User and computers.   Looks like I'm off to buy an exchange book.

Matt




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2007 ADUC

2008-09-11 Thread Troy Meyer
You are correct.

You lose something cool, exchange management in ADUC.

You gain something better, powershell and the ability to easily script 
EVERYTHING in exchange, especially user management and creation.

Find a good book, I think most folks will agree the Payette and Jones books are 
among the best.

-troy

-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 ADUC

I just started playing with Exchange 2007 today.  I'm hoping that I messed 
something up.   PLEASE tell me that Microsoft didn't take mailbox 
management/exchange attributes out of ADUC.  Did I do something wrong.   I can 
only manage exchange attributes from the Exchange console and not Active 
Directory User and computers.   Looks like I'm off to buy an exchange book.

Matt





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Exchange 2007 ADUC

2008-09-11 Thread Matt Plahtinsky
I just started playing with Exchange 2007 today.  I'm hoping that I messed
something up.   PLEASE tell me that Microsoft didn't take mailbox
management/exchange attributes out of ADUC.  Did I do something wrong.   I
can only manage exchange attributes from the Exchange console and not Active
Directory User and computers.   Looks like I'm off to buy an exchange book.

Matt

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: 2007 internal NDR's

2008-09-11 Thread Dahl, Peter
You can add the old address as a new x500 address on her new mailbox.

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2007 internal NDR's

Found another hint on this one.

She had an account last year, but it was deleted. She was a temp hire. It was 
then recreated, so it appears that maybe people are sending to the old account?



From: Kennedy, Jim
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2007 internal NDR's


Getting some odd NDR's internally on one user. This is a new user. The first 
NDR showed up from her manager. He sent to her and got the below. I dug around 
and found an odd malformed address in his personal distributions lists, deleted 
it and recreated. But the error keeps coming back even though that is fixed.



And it is spreading, it seems like everyone he ever cc'd on an email with her 
picks up this error shortly afterwards.



All of these users are strictly OWA, is there a address cache in OWA 2007 like 
there is in Outlook that I need to blow out?


Below is the NDR. Her address always shows up the same on these.  Yet all the 
others appear correct.

"Doe, Jane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,


Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: webmail04.EDUNET.LOCAL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.ExRecipNotFound; not found ##
Original message headers:  







This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) 
please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this 
communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be 
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread Dahl, Peter
Exchange 2007

Open EMC

Expand Organization Configuration

Click on Hub Transport in the left hand pane Select the Remote Domains tab 
Right-Click on the format Default * and select properties Click on the Format 
of original message... Tab select the check box for Allow automatic forward


From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

Exchange 2007 is structured quite a bit differently from 2003-I'm not sure 
where the equivalent of that is. I'm digging around, but not seeing anything 
similar...



From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

>From the Exchange server (mine is e2003), Global Settings - Internet MEssage 
>formats, double click "Default", advanced tab, see check boxes at bottom of 
>screen.

[] allow oof
[] allow auto replies
[] allow auto forward
[] allow delivery reports
[] allow ndr
[] preserve sender's display name on msg




On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, John Hornbuckle <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:
How would I check that?




From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:15 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail
do you have auto-forwarding to the Internet disabled?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM, John Hornbuckle <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take messages 
with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to a specified 
folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text message.

The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not sending 
a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in Outlook or anything 
telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I also never get the message on 
my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent Items folder (which I assume I 
should).

Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~














This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) 
please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this 
communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be 
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2007/Offline

2008-09-11 Thread Carl Houseman
That sentence doesn't parse.  Please try again.

 

If you're not in cached mode, you can't work offline.  a.k.a. you can't get
there from here.

 

 

From: Beckett, William (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2007/Offline

 

Nope. I would up reconfiguring my mailbox 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2007/Offline

 

Assume you are in cached mode?

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Beckett, William (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2007/Offline

 

Running Outlook 2007. When I go to File - drop down menu, the option to work
offline or go back online is missing, just gone. Any ideas why or how to get
it back?

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread Barsodi.John
I believe this is it.

 

EX2007 Console-> Org Config, Hub Transport, Remote Domains, Format of
original message...

 

- John Barsodi

From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

 

Exchange 2007 is structured quite a bit differently from 2003-I'm not
sure where the equivalent of that is. I'm digging around, but not seeing
anything similar...

 

 

 

From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

 

>From the Exchange server (mine is e2003), Global Settings - Internet
MEssage formats, double click "Default", advanced tab, see check boxes
at bottom of screen. 

[] allow oof
[] allow auto replies
[] allow auto forward
[] allow delivery reports 
[] allow ndr
[] preserve sender's display name on msg






On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, John Hornbuckle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

How would I check that?

 

 

 



From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:15 PM


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

do you have auto-forwarding to the Internet disabled? 

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM, John Hornbuckle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take
messages with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to
a specified folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text
message.

The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not
sending a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in
Outlook or anything telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I
also never get the message on my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent
Items folder (which I assume I should).

Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread Barsodi.John
No those aren't client side, they are server side.

 

I've run several tests in the past month to detect them on my SMTP
gateways since disabling the Auto Forward at the Org level isn't an
option here as we use it internally for quite a few processes.

 

- John Barsodi

From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

 

Yep, just need to leave Outlook running when you head home.. 




On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Sean Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

Aren't rules used to forward or re-direct e-mails considered Client-side
rules which would require the outlook profile be logged in and outlook
running in order for them to function?

 

- Sean

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Eric Woodford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>From the Exchange server (mine is e2003), Global Settings - Internet
MEssage formats, double click "Default", advanced tab, see check boxes
at bottom of screen. 

[] allow oof
[] allow auto replies
[] allow auto forward
[] allow delivery reports 
[] allow ndr
[] preserve sender's display name on msg 









On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, John Hornbuckle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

How would I check that?

 

 

 



From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:15 PM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

do you have auto-forwarding to the Internet disabled? 

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM, John Hornbuckle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take
messages with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to
a specified folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text
message.

The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not
sending a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in
Outlook or anything telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I
also never get the message on my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent
Items folder (which I assume I should).

Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us  


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread Eric Woodford
Yep, just need to leave Outlook running when you head home..



On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Sean Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Aren't rules used to forward or re-direct e-mails considered Client-side
> rules which would require the outlook profile be logged in and outlook
> running in order for them to function?
>
> - Sean
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Eric Woodford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> From the Exchange server (mine is e2003), Global Settings - Internet
>> MEssage formats, double click "Default", advanced tab, see check boxes at
>> bottom of screen.
>>
>> [] allow oof
>> [] allow auto replies
>> [] allow auto forward
>> [] allow delivery reports
>> [] allow ndr
>> [] preserve sender's display name on msg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, John Hornbuckle <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>  How would I check that?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> *From:* Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:15 PM
>>> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>>> *Subject:* Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail
>>>
>>>  do you have auto-forwarding to the Internet disabled?
>>>
>>>  On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM, John Hornbuckle <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
 I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take
 messages with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to a
 specified folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text 
 message.

 The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not
 sending a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in Outlook 
 or
 anything telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I also never get
 the message on my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent Items folder
 (which I assume I should).

 Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?



 John Hornbuckle
 MIS Department
 Taylor County School District
 318 North Clark Street
 Perry, FL 32347

 www.taylor.k12.fl.us


 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
 ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread John Hornbuckle
Exchange 2007 is structured quite a bit differently from 2003-I'm not sure 
where the equivalent of that is. I'm digging around, but not seeing anything 
similar...



From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

>From the Exchange server (mine is e2003), Global Settings - Internet MEssage 
>formats, double click "Default", advanced tab, see check boxes at bottom of 
>screen.

[] allow oof
[] allow auto replies
[] allow auto forward
[] allow delivery reports
[] allow ndr
[] preserve sender's display name on msg





On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, John Hornbuckle <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:
How would I check that?




From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:15 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail
do you have auto-forwarding to the Internet disabled?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM, John Hornbuckle <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take messages 
with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to a specified 
folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text message.

The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not sending 
a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in Outlook or anything 
telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I also never get the message on 
my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent Items folder (which I assume I 
should).

Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~










~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread Sean Martin
Aren't rules used to forward or re-direct e-mails considered Client-side
rules which would require the outlook profile be logged in and outlook
running in order for them to function?

- Sean

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Eric Woodford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> From the Exchange server (mine is e2003), Global Settings - Internet
> MEssage formats, double click "Default", advanced tab, see check boxes at
> bottom of screen.
>
> [] allow oof
> [] allow auto replies
> [] allow auto forward
> [] allow delivery reports
> [] allow ndr
> [] preserve sender's display name on msg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, John Hornbuckle <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>  How would I check that?
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> *From:* Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:15 PM
>> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail
>>
>>  do you have auto-forwarding to the Internet disabled?
>>
>>  On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM, John Hornbuckle <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take
>>> messages with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to a
>>> specified folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text message.
>>>
>>> The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not
>>> sending a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in Outlook or
>>> anything telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I also never get
>>> the message on my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent Items folder
>>> (which I assume I should).
>>>
>>> Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John Hornbuckle
>>> MIS Department
>>> Taylor County School District
>>> 318 North Clark Street
>>> Perry, FL 32347
>>>
>>> www.taylor.k12.fl.us
>>>
>>>
>>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread Eric Woodford
>From the Exchange server (mine is e2003), Global Settings - Internet MEssage
formats, double click "Default", advanced tab, see check boxes at bottom of
screen.

[] allow oof
[] allow auto replies
[] allow auto forward
[] allow delivery reports
[] allow ndr
[] preserve sender's display name on msg






On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, John Hornbuckle <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  How would I check that?
>
>
>
>  --
> *From:* Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:15 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail
>
>  do you have auto-forwarding to the Internet disabled?
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM, John Hornbuckle <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take
>> messages with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to a
>> specified folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text message.
>>
>> The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not
>> sending a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in Outlook or
>> anything telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I also never get
>> the message on my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent Items folder
>> (which I assume I should).
>>
>> Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?
>>
>>
>>
>> John Hornbuckle
>> MIS Department
>> Taylor County School District
>> 318 North Clark Street
>> Perry, FL 32347
>>
>> www.taylor.k12.fl.us
>>
>>
>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread John Hornbuckle
How would I check that?




From: Eric Woodford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

do you have auto-forwarding to the Internet disabled?

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM, John Hornbuckle <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take messages 
with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to a specified 
folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text message.

The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not sending 
a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in Outlook or anything 
telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I also never get the message on 
my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent Items folder (which I assume I 
should).

Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread Don Andrews
Hopefully there is a default setting which prevents that dangerous
option.

-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take
messages with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to
a specified folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text
message.

The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not
sending a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in
Outlook or anything telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I
also never get the message on my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent
Items folder (which I assume I should).

Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Re: Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread Eric Woodford
do you have auto-forwarding to the Internet disabled?

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:45 AM, John Hornbuckle <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take
> messages with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to a
> specified folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text message.
>
> The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not
> sending a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in Outlook or
> anything telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I also never get
> the message on my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent Items folder
> (which I assume I should).
>
> Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?
>
>
>
> John Hornbuckle
> MIS Department
> Taylor County School District
> 318 North Clark Street
> Perry, FL 32347
>
> www.taylor.k12.fl.us
>
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Outlook Rule to Redirect Mail

2008-09-11 Thread John Hornbuckle
I've created a rule in Outlook 2007 (server is Exchange 2007) to take messages 
with a certain text string in the subject and (A.) move them to a specified 
folder and (B.) redirect a copy to my cell phone via text message.

The rule is correctly moving the mail to the right folder, but it's not sending 
a copy to my cell phone. I don't get any sort of error in Outlook or anything 
telling me there's a problem with the rule, but I also never get the message on 
my phone and I don't see a copy in my Sent Items folder (which I assume I 
should).

Am I misunderstanding how the "redirect" rule option works?



John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347

www.taylor.k12.fl.us


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the organization?

2008-09-11 Thread Campbell, Rob
It's been awile.  I may not RC.

 



From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 12:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of
the organization?

 

 

**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the organization?

2008-09-11 Thread Sean Martin
It's been working fine in our environment for several years. We reject all
messages except those sent by members of a specific security group.

- Sean

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Campbell, Rob <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  IIRC, you can't do this via a group or DL under E2K3.
>
>
>
> If you put in a group, then what you're going to block is any email sent as
> that group (ie any email with that group's primary SMTP address as the From:
> field), rather than email from individual members of the group.
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2008 12:10 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of
> the organization?
>
>
>
>
>
> **
> Note:
> The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
> and
> protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
> **
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Question

2008-09-11 Thread Stefan Jafs
I have BES and then using Rogers to add Gmail and my Rogers account, it
all shows up in my inbox on my BB, but actually it adds one mail Icon
per Account.

 

__
Stefan Jafs

 

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Only when using BIS and syncing with a yahoo, gmail, livemail(hotmail),
aol, etc.   

 

You can't with BES.

 

- John Barsodi

From: Sascha Riela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Hi you can have two Mailboxes on one Blackberry. Ask your provider you
need to add a service from it. Unfortunately I don't have a
documentation, but I know it is possible.

 

Regards

Sascha

 

From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 September 2008 00:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Nah... one for the office and one for home, so he doesn't have to carry
one back and forth... J

 

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Maybe he needs to balance his belt w/ a BB on each side?

 

 



From: Fogarty, Richard R Mr CTR USA USASOC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

Exactly my question - what exactly is his goal here?

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

What's the point? There is no "transition"

Did he change carriers and phone numbers as well?

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

wow maybe I can talk him out of it.

 

he does have two units so therefore 2 pins.

 

thanks all for the input

 

David 

 

 

From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

I don't think it will function like that (only one pin per account as
far as I know) but you could create a second account, have exchange
deliver a copy to both mailboxes and connect the other BB to the
secondary account.

 

John W. Cook

Systems Administrator

Partnership For Strong Families

315 SE 2nd Ave

Gainesville, Fl 32601

Office (352) 393-2741 x320

Cell (352) 215-6944

Fax (352) 393-2746

MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Question

 

I thought I would ask before I tried this.  I have a user that wants two
blackberries.  "don't ask why,  he wants to transition to another unit"
anyway is it possible to have the same user with two different devices
and receive email.  if so how.  

 

I  have the new 4.1 sp6 with sql unit.

 

Thanks you.

 

David M. Ricci

 

 

 



CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health
Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are
prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal
and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this
information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 






 
 
 
 
 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in
error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. 

 
 
 
 
 






 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico 
Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken

RE: internal winmail.dat issues..

2008-09-11 Thread Jason Tierney
Can we set this setting centrally on the Exchange server for specific users?  I 
have users throughout an organization that cannot send DPF attachments to a 
specific external user.  Any hope for not working with every user to 
reconfigure their Contact record?

Jason Tierney, MCSE
Vice President, Consulting Services
tel: 240.425.4441
fax: 301.349.2518

From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: internal winmail.dat issues..

The Winmail.dat mystery

Do you ever receive 'winmail.dat' attachments to email messages and wonder what 
they are for?   Are they anything to worry about?

Winmail.dat appears as an attachment with some emails and it seems useless 
because you can't open it. What is the point of winmail.dat, and where did it 
come from?

The source is Microsoft Outlook.  Outlook creates the winmail.dat file, 
containing the email's formatting information.  The winmail.dat file is only 
created as an attachment to the email received when the mail program or browser 
cannot read the original email formatting.  It is an attempt to keep the 
email's original formatting intact even when it cannot be displayed by the 
receiving computer.

Usually the winmail.dat file is sent silently along with the email, because the 
email's formatting details are read by the receiving program or browser 
correctly. If the receiver also uses Microsoft Outlook you should have no 
problems and never see the winmail.dat file.

If you get a winmail.dat attachment, don't panic - just ignore it.

It doesn't do any harm and it is so small that it's not taking up any disk 
space of concern.

There's a slim possibility that a real worm or virus is hiding under the guise 
of a winmail.dat file - so best not to try opening such an attachment, just in 
case.

What to do about it -  receivers

If you are the one receiving these attachments, you can ask your friend to set 
up the email they send to you to be only plain text. Ask them to follow these 
steps:

 *   In Outlook 2003, open the Contacts folder.
 *   Open the record of the person who complains about receiving winmail.dat 
attachments.
 *   Double click their email address.
 *   In the 'Email Properties' window that opens, change 'Internet format' to 
'Send Plain Text Only'.
 *   Click Ok.



* In Outlook 2000, open the Contacts folder.

* Open the record of the person who complains about receiving 
winmail.dat attachments.

* In the Contact window that appears, select the General tab.

* Underneath their email address, check the 'Send using plain text' box.

If they use the Address book instead of the Contacts folder, use these steps 
instead:

* In Outlook 2003, select Tools | Address book.

* Double click the name of the person who complains about receiving 
winmail.dat attachments.

* In the Properties window that appears, uncheck the 'Always send to 
this recipient in Microsoft Exchange Rich Text Format' box.

* Click Ok.

 *   In Outlook 2000, select Tools | Address book.
 *   Select the name of the person who complains about receiving winmail.dat 
attachments, and select File | Properties.
 *   In the Properties window that appears, select the 'Name' tab and check the 
'Send E-Mail using plain text only' box.
 *   Click Ok.
What to do about it - senders

If you have Outlook and you have a recipient who is really bothered about 
winmail.dat files then you have some options to stop them being sent.

Outlook only creates the winmail.dat file when you are creating a Rich Text 
Format (RTF) or HTML email, or if you are using Word to create the emails. If 
an email is created using Plain text, no winmail.dat is created.

RTF and HTML emails are those you create that have formatting options, like 
font styles, background colours, and text positioning, using the formatting 
toolbar in Outlook. Plain text emails are those with just text.

If you are the one sending the winmail.dat attachments, follow these simple 
rules to make sure you never do so again.

 *   In Outlook 2003, select Tools | Options. In the Options window that 
appears select the Mail Format tab.
 *   Under the 'Message Format' heading, change 'Compose in this message 
format' to Plain Text. Uncheck the 'Use Microsoft Office Word 2003 to edit 
e-mail messages' box.
 *   Click Ok.
 *   In Outlook 2000, select Tools | Options. In the Options window that 
appears select the Mail Format tab.
 *   Under the 'Message Format' heading, change 'Send in this message format' 
to Plain Text. Uncheck the 'Use Microsoft Word to edit email messages' box.
 *   Click Ok.
Switching email formats

If you want to decide which emails you send as Plain text and which not, you 
can easily change the format of your emails as you create them.

 *In Outlook 2003, select File | New | Mail Message.
 *In the new message window that appears, select Format | Plain Text.
 *   

RE: internal winmail.dat issues..

2008-09-11 Thread Nikki Peterson - OETX


OL2000: (CW) Winmail.dat Attachments Included in Received Messages
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;197064


XFOR: Preventing Winmail.dat From Being Sent Over IMC
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;149203


OL2000: The Received Message Is Different from the Message That You Sent
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;269186


OL2000: How Message Formats Affect Internet Mail
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;241538


How to Prevent the Winmail.dat File from Being Sent to Internet Users
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q138053
 
Nikki
 
From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: internal winmail.dat issues..
 
We tried sending in different formats.  Seeing the problem on a OLK2003
and OLK2007 recipient.  I bounced the server last night, my MS TAM did
some digging on the MS internal KB and the only thing he found was
restart of services/reboot.  I'm awaiting the tests from the users in
question.  Not a fan of the "reboot" fix if this in fact fixes it.
 
- John Barsodi
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: internal winmail.dat issues..
 
As I recall, the winmail.dat is the result of sending in Rich Text
format - any issues with recipients forcing a different viewing method
or not using word as editor, not having office2k3 - something like that?
 


From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: internal winmail.dat issues..
 
Anyone ever run into this?  User receives a TON of attachments from
internal users on the same Exchange server and other internal Exchange
servers.  About 1 out of  7 attachments make through correctly, the rest
come across as winmail.dat.  Majority of the attachments are in the
20+MB range and are usually graphics or video(yes yes, I'm on the same
page about not sending these type of files via email and they are
business related).  The users mailbox is currently @ 3.6GB.  I just had
a sender send one of these attachments through with the Message format
as Plain Text, no go.  This just started 3-4 weeks ago, no changes had
been made to the Exchange infrastructure.
 
Not finding much about this occurring with internal send and recipients.
I found two forum posts that 1)a reboot fixed 2)PSS hacking the IIS
metabase to fix.  Any other ideas.  I'm going to see about getting this
server rebooted tonight to try that'fix', but I'm hoping to find a
definitive fix.
 
Servers: Win2k3/EX2k3 SP2
Client: XP/OLK2003 SP3+
 
- John Barsodi
 
 
 
 
 
 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the organization?

2008-09-11 Thread Campbell, Rob
IIRC, you can't do this via a group or DL under E2K3.  

 

If you put in a group, then what you're going to block is any email sent
as that group (ie any email with that group's primary SMTP address as
the From: field), rather than email from individual members of the
group.

 



From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 12:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of
the organization?

 

 

**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OT - Windows Server 2003 R2 POP Server

2008-09-11 Thread Michael B. Smith
Xmailserver, hmailserver, and smartermail all have free versions of their
packages that support pop3.

 

I can't remember the user counts that come into play though.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Jason Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 4:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT - Windows Server 2003 R2 POP Server

 

Sorry for the OT. I have a small client that has SBS 2003 R2.  They have the
need to host about 200 POP mailboxes for their members, but this would
obviously violate the SBS licensing agreement.

 

So, my thought is the built in Windows Server 2003 POP Server (they have
another server on their LAN).  Does anyone know how many users this service
supports?  Also, does using this in a Local File authentication method
require CALs?

 

Any other suggestions for low cost/no cost POP3 server solutions that run on
Windows?

 

Jason Tierney, MCSE

Vice President, Consulting Services

tel: 240.425.4441

fax: 301.349.2518

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the organization?

2008-09-11 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
I believe you can do that via the Delivery Restrictions tab on your
SMTP Connector.

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Evan Brastow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm wondering if someone could point me to a way to allow a user to send
> email within the company, but not to any external addresses? We only have
> one domain and one server (Exchange 2003 Enterprise), so it shouldn't be too
> complicated, I would think…
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Evan
>
>



-- 
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Re: Adding FE to Exchange 2003 Environment

2008-09-11 Thread Sean Martin
Thanks for the response Michael. I guess I was over complicating the process
in my head.

- Sean

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Michael B. Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Connectors are scoped per administrative group and define within them the
> servers that can use them.
>
>
>
> Once you want to switch from the BE sending email to the FE sending email,
> all you have to do is change that server. J
>
>
>
> Outlook clients don't change. They always talk to a MAPI server, unless you
> have RPC/HTTPS set up. In that case, you configure the profile to point to
> the FE server.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com 
>
>
>
> *From:* Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:46 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Adding FE to Exchange 2003 Environment
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> AD 2003
>
> Exchange 2003 SP2, Windows 2003 SP2
>
>
>
> I have an existing Exchange 2003 hosting approximately 2000 mailboxes. I'll
> be staging a FE server to leverage Exchange ActiveSync and eventually OWA,
> as well as offload SMTP. I have a question regarding the initial
> configuration.
>
>
>
> Our existing server is configured to forward mail to a smarthost. We also
> use an SMTP Connector to impose Delivery Restrictions on a specific security
> group. When joining the second server to the organization, I'm assuming I
> can hold off on selecting the option "this is a front-end server" which
> should allow me to configure the appropriate relay settings on the SMTP
> virtual server as well as configure the SMTP connector. When configuring the
> SMTP connector, can I setup the address space for SMTP * and configure a
> lower cost initially? Once I'm ready to make the switch, do I configure the
> SMTP Virt Server and Connector to forward mail to the new front-end, switch
> the cost within the address space on both servers, and go from there?
>
>
>
> What about Outlook client connectivity internally? How would existing
> outlook profiles know to communicate with the FE?
>
>
>
> - Sean
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Question

2008-09-11 Thread Barsodi.John
Right.  The OP is talking about BES and his exchange server, not a
freemail accounts in conjunction with a work account..

 

- John Barsodi

From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

I have BES and then using Rogers to add Gmail and my Rogers account, it
all shows up in my inbox on my BB, but actually it adds one mail Icon
per Account.

 

__
Stefan Jafs

 

From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Only when using BIS and syncing with a yahoo, gmail, livemail(hotmail),
aol, etc.   

 

You can't with BES.

 

- John Barsodi

From: Sascha Riela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Hi you can have two Mailboxes on one Blackberry. Ask your provider you
need to add a service from it. Unfortunately I don't have a
documentation, but I know it is possible.

 

Regards

Sascha

 

From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 September 2008 00:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Nah... one for the office and one for home, so he doesn't have to carry
one back and forth... J

 

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Maybe he needs to balance his belt w/ a BB on each side?

 

 



From: Fogarty, Richard R Mr CTR USA USASOC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

Exactly my question - what exactly is his goal here?

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

What's the point? There is no "transition"

Did he change carriers and phone numbers as well?

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

wow maybe I can talk him out of it.

 

he does have two units so therefore 2 pins.

 

thanks all for the input

 

David 

 

 

From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

I don't think it will function like that (only one pin per account as
far as I know) but you could create a second account, have exchange
deliver a copy to both mailboxes and connect the other BB to the
secondary account.

 

John W. Cook

Systems Administrator

Partnership For Strong Families

315 SE 2nd Ave

Gainesville, Fl 32601

Office (352) 393-2741 x320

Cell (352) 215-6944

Fax (352) 393-2746

MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Question

 

I thought I would ask before I tried this.  I have a user that wants two
blackberries.  "don't ask why,  he wants to transition to another unit"
anyway is it possible to have the same user with two different devices
and receive email.  if so how.  

 

I  have the new 4.1 sp6 with sql unit.

 

Thanks you.

 

David M. Ricci

 

 

 



CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health
Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are
prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal
and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this
information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 






 
 
 
 
 
 
 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in
error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 






 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intende

RE: OWA

2008-09-11 Thread Scott Schneider
I have found the answer. After some more testing I found the problem
stayed with IE7 only, IE6 worked fine, confirming the server end was OK.
 
I had to download the s/MIME control under Mail Security while in OWA..
 
Cheers



From: Scott Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: September-11-08 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA



I am running Exchange 2003 SP2 on an active passive cluster. I can get
into OWA and send new messages without a problem. 

When I attempt to forward  a message it errors out with the following 

Internet Explorer cannot open the Internet site
http://exchange/exchange/username/drafts/"name_of_the_email.EML
  

Operation Aborted 

When I attempt to reply to a message I get a "page cannot be found
error" HTTP Error 404 File or Directory not found. 

I am using IIS on the active node for the exchange virtual server, not a
separate front end server. 

Does anybody have any ideas on where I should look to troubleshoot? 

Thanks 

Scott Schneider
Senior Network Admin

INSCAPE
67 Toll Road, Holland Landing
Ontario, L9N 1H2
T 905 836 7676 Ext. 3433
F 905 836 6000

www.inscapesolutions.com  





 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2007/Offline

2008-09-11 Thread Beckett, William (Bill)
Nope. I would up reconfiguring my mailbox 

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2007/Offline

 

Assume you are in cached mode?

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Beckett, William (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2007/Offline

 

Running Outlook 2007. When I go to File - drop down menu, the option to
work offline or go back online is missing, just gone. Any ideas why or
how to get it back?

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the organization?

2008-09-11 Thread Sean Martin
You can use the delivery restrictions within the SMTP connector to manage
this. You can accept message from all users except those defined within a
specific security group, or, reject messages from all users except those
defined in a specific security group. It boils down to which method is
easier for you to manage.

- Sean

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Evan Brastow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm wondering if someone could point me to a way to allow a user to send
> email within the company, but not to any external addresses? We only have
> one domain and one server (Exchange 2003 Enterprise), so it shouldn't be too
> complicated, I would think…
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Evan
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Enterprise Antivirus Survey:

2008-09-11 Thread Ralph Smith
Is VIPRE considered a suite or dedicated?

 



From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 2:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Enterprise Antivirus Survey:

 

Enterprise Antivirus Survey:  If you'd like to make your voice heard to
the antivirus industry, now is your chance!  This survey is part of a
global study on antivirus product customer satisfaction, and will be
presented at an upcoming major security conference. Your time would be
really appreciated in answering this short survey. 

http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/\surveys/080910-aventerprise.htm
  

 

 

.

 

 


Confidentiality Notice: 

--



This communication, including any attachments, may contain confidential 
information and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed. Any review, dissemination, or copying of this communication by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not 
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, delete and 
destroy all copies of the original message.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Sam Cayze
Alex summed it up.  Case closed. "IMHO if they're not trusted they
shouldn't be domain admins..."



From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Admins in Email


Domain Admins are explicitly denied sendas/receiveas (doesn't mean they
can't change that), but IMHO if they're not trusted they shouldn't be
domain admins...
-alex


On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Travis Krampy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:


Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from
viewing other people's email?

Thanks

Travis 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image
Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja
~



 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email disclaimer

2008-09-11 Thread Roger Wright
CodeTwo's product is pretty easy to setup and about as inexpensive as
you'll find.

 

   

 

Roger Wright

Network Administrator

Evatone, Inc.

727.572.7076  x388

_  

 

From: Jeff Sparks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email disclaimer

 

Can anyone help with this,

I am trying to set up a corporate email disclaimer with personal
signatures on exchange 2k3 sp2, I have a single server environment.  I
have found several suggestions including a script to incorporate message
in outgoing email,   It has also been suggested that  a simpler way to
do this is by using a third party tool such as CodeTwo.  We are a small
shop so cost is an issue.  Would anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jeff Sparks

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2007/Offline

2008-09-11 Thread Nikki Peterson - OETX
You are probably in CACHED MODE now.
 
Nikki
 
From: Beckett, William (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 5:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2007/Offline
 
Running Outlook 2007. When I go to File - drop down menu, the option to
work offline or go back online is missing, just gone. Any ideas why or
how to get it back?
 
 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the organization?

2008-09-11 Thread Martin Blackstone
I used this method in the past

http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF009.html

 

The nice thing is since you are using groups, you can easily add and remove
people from the group.

 

From: Evan Brastow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the
organization?

 

Hi,

 

I'm wondering if someone could point me to a way to allow a user to send
email within the company, but not to any external addresses? We only have
one domain and one server (Exchange 2003 Enterprise), so it shouldn't be too
complicated, I would think.

 

Thank you,

 

Evan

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: email disclaimer

2008-09-11 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
Try our list sponsor's product.  It's very inexpensive and works great.
Ninja Disclaimers, take a look at it.

On 9/10/08, Jeff Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Can anyone help with this,
>
> I am trying to set up a corporate email disclaimer with personal signatures
> on exchange 2k3 sp2, I have a single server environment.  I have found
> several suggestions including a script to incorporate message in outgoing
> email,   It has also been suggested that  a simpler way to do this is by
> using a third party tool such as CodeTwo.  We are a small shop so cost is an
> issue.  Would anyone have any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff Sparks
>
>
>



-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: SMTP Issues.

2008-09-11 Thread Michael B. Smith
Exchange 2003 and before do not support "pop before smtp". Therefore, to allow 
relaying, you need to turn on SMTP AUTH and have the external users 
authenticate before they send email.

I also strongly recommend that you put in an SSL certificate and require either 
SMTP over SSL or TLS. For POP too.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 5:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SMTP Issues.

Hi all, been awhile since I setup a new exchange server so I am a bit rusty..
In order to allow clients to access the server across the web via SMTP and POP3 
is there anything specific I need to do?

I have:
Enabled the POP & SMTP protocols & allowed access through the firewalls.


I can use POP3 and SMTP internally (on the LAN) and it works just fine, however 
one remote user is reporting error messages saying that relaying is disallowed.

My relay settings are: (on the SMTP protocol virtual server):
'allow all computers which successfully authenticate to relay, regardless of 
the list above'

however, this doesn't seem to work, nor does deselecting the above and manually 
specifying that the user is allowed to relay.

Even though adding by username doesn't seem to do anything, if I add the user's 
IP address to the 'allow relay' list then they can send normally. Unfortunately 
however, none of the users have static IP's.

I do not have any authentication enabled on this virtual server as it's the web 
facing SMTP handler.
Should I be using an additional SMTP V/S with authentication enabled for remote 
users who need to be able to relay?

Any advice or suggestions would be great!

Thanks, Stu.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: email disclaimer

2008-09-11 Thread Michael B. Smith
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/exchange-20
0x-outgoing-message-disclaimers.aspx

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Jeff Sparks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email disclaimer

 

Can anyone help with this,

I am trying to set up a corporate email disclaimer with personal signatures
on exchange 2k3 sp2, I have a single server environment.  I have found
several suggestions including a script to incorporate message in outgoing
email,   It has also been suggested that  a simpler way to do this is by
using a third party tool such as CodeTwo.  We are a small shop so cost is an
issue.  Would anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jeff Sparks

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: email disclaimer

2008-09-11 Thread James Kerr
We use exclaimer and if we bought it, then it can't be that expensive.

James
  - Original Message - 
  From: Jeff Sparks 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:58 PM
  Subject: email disclaimer


  Can anyone help with this,

  I am trying to set up a corporate email disclaimer with personal signatures 
on exchange 2k3 sp2, I have a single server environment.  I have found several 
suggestions including a script to incorporate message in outgoing email,   It 
has also been suggested that  a simpler way to do this is by using a third 
party tool such as CodeTwo.  We are a small shop so cost is an issue.  Would 
anyone have any suggestions?

  Thanks,

  Jeff Sparks

   





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Question

2008-09-11 Thread Don Andrews
BIS, yes - BES, I don't think so.

 



From: Sascha Riela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Hi you can have two Mailboxes on one Blackberry. Ask your provider you
need to add a service from it. Unfortunately I don't have a
documentation, but I know it is possible.

 

Regards

Sascha

 

From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 September 2008 00:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Nah... one for the office and one for home, so he doesn't have to carry
one back and forth... :-)

 

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Maybe he needs to balance his belt w/ a BB on each side?

 

 



From: Fogarty, Richard R Mr CTR USA USASOC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

Exactly my question - what exactly is his goal here?

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

What's the point? There is no "transition"

Did he change carriers and phone numbers as well?

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

wow maybe I can talk him out of it.

 

he does have two units so therefore 2 pins.

 

thanks all for the input

 

David 

 

 

From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

I don't think it will function like that (only one pin per account as
far as I know) but you could create a second account, have exchange
deliver a copy to both mailboxes and connect the other BB to the
secondary account.

 

John W. Cook

Systems Administrator

Partnership For Strong Families

315 SE 2nd Ave

Gainesville, Fl 32601

Office (352) 393-2741 x320

Cell (352) 215-6944

Fax (352) 393-2746

MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Question

 

I thought I would ask before I tried this.  I have a user that wants two
blackberries.  "don't ask why,  he wants to transition to another unit"
anyway is it possible to have the same user with two different devices
and receive email.  if so how.  

 

I  have the new 4.1 sp6 with sql unit.

 

Thanks you.

 

David M. Ricci

 

 

 



CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health
Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are
prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal
and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this
information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 







 
 
 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in
error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. 

 
 
 







 
 
 

 

 

 



 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: internal winmail.dat issues..

2008-09-11 Thread Barsodi.John
Thanks Nikki.  

 

The issue we were seeing wasn't as described below in your snippet, it
was email that 1 user out of 10 recipients would get the winmail.dat.
The difference was that this one user was on a different Exchange server
than the other 9.  The attachments were 20-25MB AVI's and .PSD's but
showing up as winmail.dat even when sent as plain text from the sender.
The reboot cleared it, which I hate.  Hopefully it won't reappear again
before I start the EX2007 transition in Oct.

 

- John Barsodi

From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: internal winmail.dat issues..

 

The Winmail.dat mystery

Do you ever receive 'winmail.dat' attachments to email messages and
wonder what they are for?   Are they anything to worry about? 

Winmail.dat appears as an attachment with some emails and it seems
useless because you can't open it. What is the point of winmail.dat, and
where did it come from?

The source is Microsoft Outlook.  Outlook creates the winmail.dat file,
containing the email's formatting information.  The winmail.dat file is
only created as an attachment to the email received when the mail
program or browser cannot read the original email formatting.  It is an
attempt to keep the email's original formatting intact even when it
cannot be displayed by the receiving computer.

Usually the winmail.dat file is sent silently along with the email,
because the email's formatting details are read by the receiving program
or browser correctly. If the receiver also uses Microsoft Outlook you
should have no problems and never see the winmail.dat file.

If you get a winmail.dat attachment, don't panic - just ignore it.  

It doesn't do any harm and it is so small that it's not taking up any
disk space of concern.

There's a slim possibility that a real worm or virus is hiding under the
guise of a winmail.dat file - so best not to try opening such an
attachment, just in case.

What to do about it -  receivers

If you are the one receiving these attachments, you can ask your friend
to set up the email they send to you to be only plain text. Ask them to
follow these steps:

*   In Outlook 2003, open the Contacts folder. 
*   Open the record of the person who complains about receiving
winmail.dat attachments. 
*   Double click their email address. 
*   In the 'Email Properties' window that opens, change 'Internet
format' to 'Send Plain Text Only'. 
*   Click Ok. 

 

* In Outlook 2000, open the Contacts folder.

* Open the record of the person who complains about receiving
winmail.dat attachments. 

* In the Contact window that appears, select the General tab. 

* Underneath their email address, check the 'Send using plain
text' box. 

If they use the Address book instead of the Contacts folder, use these
steps instead:

* In Outlook 2003, select Tools | Address book.

* Double click the name of the person who complains about
receiving winmail.dat attachments. 

* In the Properties window that appears, uncheck the 'Always
send to this recipient in Microsoft Exchange Rich Text Format' box. 

* Click Ok.

*   In Outlook 2000, select Tools | Address book. 
*   Select the name of the person who complains about receiving
winmail.dat attachments, and select File | Properties. 
*   In the Properties window that appears, select the 'Name' tab and
check the 'Send E-Mail using plain text only' box. 
*   Click Ok. 

What to do about it - senders

If you have Outlook and you have a recipient who is really bothered
about winmail.dat files then you have some options to stop them being
sent.

Outlook only creates the winmail.dat file when you are creating a Rich
Text Format (RTF) or HTML email, or if you are using Word to create the
emails. If an email is created using Plain text, no winmail.dat is
created. 

RTF and HTML emails are those you create that have formatting options,
like font styles, background colours, and text positioning, using the
formatting toolbar in Outlook. Plain text emails are those with just
text. 

If you are the one sending the winmail.dat attachments, follow these
simple rules to make sure you never do so again. 

*   In Outlook 2003, select Tools | Options. In the Options window
that appears select the Mail Format tab. 
*   Under the 'Message Format' heading, change 'Compose in this
message format' to Plain Text. Uncheck the 'Use Microsoft Office Word
2003 to edit e-mail messages' box. 
*   Click Ok. 
*   In Outlook 2000, select Tools | Options. In the Options window
that appears select the Mail Format tab. 
*   Under the 'Message Format' heading, change 'Send in this message
format' to Plain Text. Uncheck the 'Use Microsoft Word to edit email
messages' box. 
*   Click Ok. 

Switching email formats

If you want to decide which emails you send as Plain text and which not,
you ca

RE: Blackberry Question

2008-09-11 Thread Stefan Jafs
I have 3 on mine, my work my Rogers and my Gmail!

 

__
Stefan Jafs

 

From: Sascha Riela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 02:34
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Hi you can have two Mailboxes on one Blackberry. Ask your provider you
need to add a service from it. Unfortunately I don't have a
documentation, but I know it is possible.

 

Regards

Sascha

 

From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 September 2008 00:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Nah... one for the office and one for home, so he doesn't have to carry
one back and forth... J

 

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Maybe he needs to balance his belt w/ a BB on each side?

 

 



From: Fogarty, Richard R Mr CTR USA USASOC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

Exactly my question - what exactly is his goal here?

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

What's the point? There is no "transition"

Did he change carriers and phone numbers as well?

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

wow maybe I can talk him out of it.

 

he does have two units so therefore 2 pins.

 

thanks all for the input

 

David 

 

 

From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

I don't think it will function like that (only one pin per account as
far as I know) but you could create a second account, have exchange
deliver a copy to both mailboxes and connect the other BB to the
secondary account.

 

John W. Cook

Systems Administrator

Partnership For Strong Families

315 SE 2nd Ave

Gainesville, Fl 32601

Office (352) 393-2741 x320

Cell (352) 215-6944

Fax (352) 393-2746

MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Question

 

I thought I would ask before I tried this.  I have a user that wants two
blackberries.  "don't ask why,  he wants to transition to another unit"
anyway is it possible to have the same user with two different devices
and receive email.  if so how.  

 

I  have the new 4.1 sp6 with sql unit.

 

Thanks you.

 

David M. Ricci

 

 

 



CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health
Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are
prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal
and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this
information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 






 
 
 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in
error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. 

 
 
 






 
 
 

 

 

 



 

 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico 
Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure 
no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility 
for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2007/Offline

2008-09-11 Thread Louis, Joe
Sounds like the client can't access the OST. Navigate to it and see that (1) it 
still exists or (2) the client knows how to find it. There's allot of great 
info in O2k7 about "outlook offline".

Joe Louis

From: Beckett, William (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2007/Offline

Running Outlook 2007. When I go to File - drop down menu, the option to work 
offline or go back online is missing, just gone. Any ideas why or how to get it 
back?




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: email disclaimer

2008-09-11 Thread Brumbaugh, Luke
GFI has or had a free trial that latter turned to just a disclaimer.

I used it at several non-profit clients.   TXT and HTML

 

 

From: Jeff Sparks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: email disclaimer

 

Can anyone help with this,

I am trying to set up a corporate email disclaimer with personal
signatures on exchange 2k3 sp2, I have a single server environment.  I
have found several suggestions including a script to incorporate message
in outgoing email,   It has also been suggested that  a simpler way to
do this is by using a third party tool such as CodeTwo.  We are a small
shop so cost is an issue.  Would anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jeff Sparks

 

 


**
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information transmitted in this message is 
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document.  Thank you.  
Butler Animal Health Supply
**


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Question

2008-09-11 Thread Bingham, Kevin
Hm... did I forget to add my sarcasm tags again?

 

 

From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Blackberry Question

 

What about in between?  Isn't that what the berry's for?

- Original Message - 

From: Bingham, Kevin   

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  

Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 3:04 PM

Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Nah... one for the office and one for home, so he doesn't have
to carry one back and forth... J

 

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Maybe he needs to balance his belt w/ a BB on each side?

 

 





From: Fogarty, Richard R Mr CTR USA USASOC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

Exactly my question - what exactly is his goal here?

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

What's the point? There is no "transition"

Did he change carriers and phone numbers as well?

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

wow maybe I can talk him out of it.

 

he does have two units so therefore 2 pins.

 

thanks all for the input

 

David 

 

 

From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

I don't think it will function like that (only one pin per
account as far as I know) but you could create a second account, have
exchange deliver a copy to both mailboxes and connect the other BB to
the secondary account.

 

John W. Cook

Systems Administrator

Partnership For Strong Families

315 SE 2nd Ave

Gainesville, Fl 32601

Office (352) 393-2741 x320

Cell (352) 215-6944

Fax (352) 393-2746

MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Question

 

I thought I would ask before I tried this.  I have a user that
wants two blackberries.  "don't ask why,  he wants to transition to
another unit"  anyway is it possible to have the same user with two
different devices and receive email.  if so how.  

 

I  have the new 4.1 sp6 with sql unit.

 

Thanks you.

 

David M. Ricci

 

 

 





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or
contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected
Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any
action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the
sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other
Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of
this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless
you really need to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 







 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in
error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. 

 






 

 

 

 

 



 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain 
privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt fro

Re: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
+1

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Alex Fontana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Domain Admins are explicitly denied sendas/receiveas (doesn't mean they
> can't change that), but IMHO if they're not trusted they shouldn't be domain
> admins...
> -alex
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Travis Krampy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing
>> other people's email?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Travis
>>
>> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
>> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>
>



-- 
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Outlook 2007/Offline

2008-09-11 Thread Bob Fronk
Assume you are in cached mode?

 

Bob Fronk

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

From: Beckett, William (Bill) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2007/Offline

 

Running Outlook 2007. When I go to File - drop down menu, the option to
work offline or go back online is missing, just gone. Any ideas why or
how to get it back?

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blackberry Question

2008-09-11 Thread Barsodi.John
Only when using BIS and syncing with a yahoo, gmail, livemail(hotmail),
aol, etc.   

 

You can't with BES.

 

- John Barsodi

From: Sascha Riela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Hi you can have two Mailboxes on one Blackberry. Ask your provider you
need to add a service from it. Unfortunately I don't have a
documentation, but I know it is possible.

 

Regards

Sascha

 

From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 September 2008 00:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Nah... one for the office and one for home, so he doesn't have to carry
one back and forth... J

 

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

Maybe he needs to balance his belt w/ a BB on each side?

 

 



From: Fogarty, Richard R Mr CTR USA USASOC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

Exactly my question - what exactly is his goal here?

 

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

What's the point? There is no "transition"

Did he change carriers and phone numbers as well?

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

wow maybe I can talk him out of it.

 

he does have two units so therefore 2 pins.

 

thanks all for the input

 

David 

 

 

From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

 

I don't think it will function like that (only one pin per account as
far as I know) but you could create a second account, have exchange
deliver a copy to both mailboxes and connect the other BB to the
secondary account.

 

John W. Cook

Systems Administrator

Partnership For Strong Families

315 SE 2nd Ave

Gainesville, Fl 32601

Office (352) 393-2741 x320

Cell (352) 215-6944

Fax (352) 393-2746

MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+

 

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Question

 

I thought I would ask before I tried this.  I have a user that wants two
blackberries.  "don't ask why,  he wants to transition to another unit"
anyway is it possible to have the same user with two different devices
and receive email.  if so how.  

 

I  have the new 4.1 sp6 with sql unit.

 

Thanks you.

 

David M. Ricci

 

 

 



CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health
Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are
prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal
and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this
information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 






 
 
 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in
error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. 

 
 
 






 
 
 

 

 

 



 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the organization?

2008-09-11 Thread Campbell, Rob
Delivery Restrictions tab on your internet mail connector.  Add them to
the "Reject Messages From" list.

 



From: Evan Brastow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the
organization?

 

Hi,

 

I'm wondering if someone could point me to a way to allow a user to send
email within the company, but not to any external addresses? We only
have one domain and one server (Exchange 2003 Enterprise), so it
shouldn't be too complicated, I would think...

 

Thank you,

 

Evan

 

 

**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: ActiveSync for Exchange Server 2003

2008-09-11 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
Yes, I only have one Exchange server.

On 9/9/08, Sham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Also... we only have one Exchange server. Is anyone else leveraging
> ActiveSync and Mobile Services in this kind of environment?
>
> Again... Thanks.
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>



-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

OWA

2008-09-11 Thread Scott Schneider
I am running Exchange 2003 SP2 on an active passive cluster. I can get
into OWA and send new messages without a problem. 

When I attempt to forward  a message it errors out with the following

Internet Explorer cannot open the Internet site
http://exchange/exchange/username/drafts/"name_of_the_email.EML
 

Operation Aborted

When I attempt to reply to a message I get a "page cannot be found
error" HTTP Error 404 File or Directory not found.

I am using IIS on the active node for the exchange virtual server, not a
separate front end server.

Does anybody have any ideas on where I should look to troubleshoot?

Thanks

Scott Schneider




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: ActiveSync for Exchange Server 2003

2008-09-11 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
Get a certificate, that will be the first thing to do since it appears that
it is a done deal from mgmt's point of view ;).  I just had to do this a
month or so ago, and interestingly enough when the CEO got an iPhone and had
it all up and synching, after 1 day, he retured the iPhone, and asked for
his Blackberry back because he didn't like the iPhone.  Be sure to have
management setup some rules about who or how someone can connect their
Windows mobile devices to use ActiveSync.  Here, the manager of the person
requesting it has to give written approval before they can connect their
phone, and not everyone has gotten approval.  It would be wise to get HR
involved as well as there are some legal issues about hourly (in particular)
employees reading email "off the clock".

On 9/9/08, Shamika Fehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am in the initial stages of researching Active Sync and Mobile Services
> for Exchange Server 2003 and using iPhones. Does anyone have any pros/cons
> to using this rather than sticking with our BES server and Blackberry
> handheld devices? Right now, I'm gathering information, but from a
> management point of view, it's pretty much a done deal.
>
> Thanks for your help and suggestions.
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Take ownership of calendar items

2008-09-11 Thread David L Herrick
Interesting Idea 

tx

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Take ownership of calendar items

I've never tried this, but you might try giving someone an X.400 address
that matches the organizer's old X.400 address.

That might do it.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: David L Herrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Take ownership of calendar items

IS it possible to Take ownership of calendar items where the organizer
no longer exists?

Exchange 2003

Tx

David


This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should
not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions
expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
Names in the News company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken
to
make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot
accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this
email
or attachments.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Names in the 
News company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no 
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Re: Blocking a whole domain

2008-09-11 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Except the from: address is not the same as the envelope sender -
which is almost always different (being sent from different zombies,
etc).  Think of it as a unique email signature - where as the from:
address is the spoofed impersonation.


On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Carl Houseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.outlookpower.com/issues/issue200301/spam001.html
>
>
>
> Carl
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:39 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blocking a whole domain
>
>
>
> I've been getting an increase of spam from .pl.  In order to block this
> whole domain, would that be in the Sender Filtering of Global Settings ->
> Message Delivery?
>
> I put it in as [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Is that correct?
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> AISA
>
> Employment Training Panel
>
> 1100 J Street, 4th Floor
>
> Sacramento, CA  95814
>
> (916) 327-5276
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Re: Blocking a whole domain

2008-09-11 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
If you want to block countries, you could try this:

   


On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Chip Chuprinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe:
>
>
>
> I have a custom Country rule set up using a regular expression:
>
>
>
> \.ru$|\.ar$|\.au$|\.at$|\.uk$|\.jo$|\.jp$|\.de$|\.lt$|\.dk$|\.pl$|\.nl$|\.be$|\.at$|\.uy$|\.ae$|\.br$|\.se$|\.cn$|\.ch$|\.cy$|\.tw$|\.kr$|\.it$|\.id$|\.in$|\.gr$|\.es$|\.cz$|\.pe$|\.pt$|\.hu$\.ua$|\.sk$|\.za$|\.pe$
>
>
>
> This rule blocks all senders who have one of the items in the list as their
> final few characters of the email address.
>
>
>
> Set the rule to delete the email. Add more countries using a |\.xx$  string.
> The | is a OR function (this or this or this or…). The backslash period
> (dot) says that the dot is literal, the xx is the 2 character country code
> (in your case pl) and the $ sign at the end says the .xx must be at the
> right end of the email address.
>
>
>
> If you only have one country, then use \.pl$  in the expression line. Set
> the rule type to be regular expression.
>
>
>
> I have a whole list of regular expressions for items dealing with sex,
> drugs, meds, sales, etc. Drops em out quick as a wink. The rule is to not
> put too many expressions in a string. I probably need to split my country
> rule into 3 or 4 and alphabetize them to make it easy to check for dups.
>
>
>
> Let me know if this works for ya…
>
>
>
> Chip Chuprinko
>
> Programming/Network Admin
>
> --
>
> Southwest Clean Air Agency
>
>
>
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:39 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blocking a whole domain
>
>
>
> I've been getting an increase of spam from .pl.  In order to block this
> whole domain, would that be in the Sender Filtering of Global Settings ->
> Message Delivery?
>
> I put it in as [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Is that correct?
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> AISA
>
> Employment Training Panel
>
> 1100 J Street, 4th Floor
>
> Sacramento, CA  95814
>
> (916) 327-5276
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: exchange 2003 with server 2008

2008-09-11 Thread Michael B. Smith
The necessity for this capability was removed in Exchange 2007, so the
capability was removed in Windows 2008.

 

There may be a hack for it, but I don't think I've seen one.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 3:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange 2003 with server 2008

 

I've recently upgraded the domain to 08.  For some reason, the exchange tabs
in AD don't show up.  Is there something I need to add?  I'm guessing
installing the adminpak.msi will solve this...or does the exch03 pack work
with windows 2k8?

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: 2007 internal NDR's

2008-09-11 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Found another hint on this one.

She had an account last year, but it was deleted. She was a temp hire. It was 
then recreated, so it appears that maybe people are sending to the old account?



From: Kennedy, Jim
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2007 internal NDR's


Getting some odd NDR's internally on one user. This is a new user. The first 
NDR showed up from her manager. He sent to her and got the below. I dug around 
and found an odd malformed address in his personal distributions lists, deleted 
it and recreated. But the error keeps coming back even though that is fixed.



And it is spreading, it seems like everyone he ever cc'd on an email with her 
picks up this error shortly afterwards.



All of these users are strictly OWA, is there a address cache in OWA 2007 like 
there is in Outlook that I need to blow out?


Below is the NDR. Her address always shows up the same on these.  Yet all the 
others appear correct.

"Doe, Jane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,


Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: webmail04.EDUNET.LOCAL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.ExRecipNotFound; not found ##
Original message headers:  



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

OWA

2008-09-11 Thread Scott Schneider
I am running Exchange 2003 SP2 on an active passive cluster. I can get into OWA 
and send new messages without a problem. 

When I attempt to forward  a message it errors out with the following

Internet Explorer cannot open the Internet site 
http://exchange/exchange/username/drafts/"name_of_the_email.EML 
 

Operation Aborted

When I attempt to reply to a message I get a "page cannot be found error" HTTP 
Error 404 File or Directory not found.

I am using IIS on the active node for the exchange virtual server, not a 
separate front end server.

Does anybody have any ideas on where I should look to troubleshoot?

Thanks

Scott Schneider
Senior Network Admin

INSCAPE
67 Toll Road, Holland Landing
Ontario, L9N 1H2 
T 905 836 7676 Ext. 3433 
F 905 836 6000

www.inscapesolutions.com





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

2007 internal NDR's

2008-09-11 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Getting some odd NDR's internally on one user. This is a new user. The first 
NDR showed up from her manager. He sent to her and got the below. I dug around 
and found an odd malformed address in his personal distributions lists, deleted 
it and recreated. But the error keeps coming back even though that is fixed.



And it is spreading, it seems like everyone he ever cc'd on an email with her 
picks up this error shortly afterwards.



All of these users are strictly OWA, is there a address cache in OWA 2007 like 
there is in Outlook that I need to blow out?


Below is the NDR. Her address always shows up the same on these.  Yet all the 
others appear correct.

"Doe, Jane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,


Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: webmail04.EDUNET.LOCAL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.ExRecipNotFound; not found ##
Original message headers:  



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Eric Woodford
depends on how determined they are. If they don't have rights on the
Exchange server, they shouldn't be able to access another's mailbox.

But then, they could always reset the user's password, then logon as them..

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Travis Krampy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing
> other people's email?
>
> Thanks
>
> Travis
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Take ownership of calendar items

2008-09-11 Thread Steven Peck
Not that I've ever encountered.

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:19 AM, David L Herrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IS it possible to Take ownership of calendar items where the organizer
> no longer exists?
>
> Exchange 2003
>
> Tx
>
> David
>
>
> This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for 
> the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not 
> read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed 
> in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Names 
> in the News company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make 
> sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept 
> responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email 
> or attachments.
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Re: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Steven Peck
Add the Deny permission to the Domain Admins group

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Travis Krampy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing
> other people's email?
>
> Thanks
>
> Travis
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Bob Fronk
It is by default in Exchange 2003 SP2.

What are you using?

Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Admins in Email

Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing

other people's email?

Thanks

Travis 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


OT - Windows Server 2003 R2 POP Server

2008-09-11 Thread Jason Tierney
Sorry for the OT. I have a small client that has SBS 2003 R2.  They have the 
need to host about 200 POP mailboxes for their members, but this would 
obviously violate the SBS licensing agreement.

So, my thought is the built in Windows Server 2003 POP Server (they have 
another server on their LAN).  Does anyone know how many users this service 
supports?  Also, does using this in a Local File authentication method require 
CALs?

Any other suggestions for low cost/no cost POP3 server solutions that run on 
Windows?

Jason Tierney, MCSE
Vice President, Consulting Services
tel: 240.425.4441
fax: 301.349.2518

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

email disclaimer

2008-09-11 Thread Jeff Sparks
Can anyone help with this,

I am trying to set up a corporate email disclaimer with personal
signatures on exchange 2k3 sp2, I have a single server environment.  I
have found several suggestions including a script to incorporate message
in outgoing email,   It has also been suggested that  a simpler way to
do this is by using a third party tool such as CodeTwo.  We are a small
shop so cost is an issue.  Would anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jeff Sparks

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Steve Ens
Yes, make sure the domain admins don't have the necessary rights to the mail
server...

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Travis Krampy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing
> other people's email?
>
> Thanks
>
> Travis
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Martin Blackstone
It is restricted by default. 

-Original Message-
From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Admins in Email

Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing 
other people's email?

Thanks

Travis 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Blocking a whole domain

2008-09-11 Thread Joe Heaton
Chip,

Where do you have that rule?  That looks like something I'd really like to use.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Enterprise Antivirus Survey:

2008-09-11 Thread Stu Sjouwerman
Enterprise Antivirus Survey:  If you'd like to make your voice heard to
the antivirus industry, now is your chance!  This survey is part of a
global study on antivirus product customer satisfaction, and will be
presented at an upcoming major security conference. Your time would be
really appreciated in answering this short survey. 
http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/\surveys/080910-aventerprise.htm
  



..
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: internal winmail.dat issues..

2008-09-11 Thread Nikki Peterson - OETX
The Winmail.dat mystery
Do you ever receive 'winmail.dat' attachments to email messages and
wonder what they are for?   Are they anything to worry about? 
Winmail.dat appears as an attachment with some emails and it seems
useless because you can't open it. What is the point of winmail.dat, and
where did it come from?
The source is Microsoft Outlook.  Outlook creates the winmail.dat file,
containing the email's formatting information.  The winmail.dat file is
only created as an attachment to the email received when the mail
program or browser cannot read the original email formatting.  It is an
attempt to keep the email's original formatting intact even when it
cannot be displayed by the receiving computer.
Usually the winmail.dat file is sent silently along with the email,
because the email's formatting details are read by the receiving program
or browser correctly. If the receiver also uses Microsoft Outlook you
should have no problems and never see the winmail.dat file.
If you get a winmail.dat attachment, don't panic - just ignore it.  
It doesn't do any harm and it is so small that it's not taking up any
disk space of concern.
There's a slim possibility that a real worm or virus is hiding under the
guise of a winmail.dat file - so best not to try opening such an
attachment, just in case.
What to do about it -  receivers
If you are the one receiving these attachments, you can ask your friend
to set up the email they send to you to be only plain text. Ask them to
follow these steps:
*   In Outlook 2003, open the Contacts folder. 
*   Open the record of the person who complains about receiving
winmail.dat attachments. 
*   Double click their email address. 
*   In the 'Email Properties' window that opens, change 'Internet
format' to 'Send Plain Text Only'. 
*   Click Ok. 
 
* In Outlook 2000, open the Contacts folder.
* Open the record of the person who complains about receiving
winmail.dat attachments. 
* In the Contact window that appears, select the General tab. 
* Underneath their email address, check the 'Send using plain
text' box. 
If they use the Address book instead of the Contacts folder, use these
steps instead:
* In Outlook 2003, select Tools | Address book.
* Double click the name of the person who complains about
receiving winmail.dat attachments. 
* In the Properties window that appears, uncheck the 'Always
send to this recipient in Microsoft Exchange Rich Text Format' box. 
* Click Ok.
*   In Outlook 2000, select Tools | Address book. 
*   Select the name of the person who complains about receiving
winmail.dat attachments, and select File | Properties. 
*   In the Properties window that appears, select the 'Name' tab and
check the 'Send E-Mail using plain text only' box. 
*   Click Ok. 
What to do about it - senders
If you have Outlook and you have a recipient who is really bothered
about winmail.dat files then you have some options to stop them being
sent.
Outlook only creates the winmail.dat file when you are creating a Rich
Text Format (RTF) or HTML email, or if you are using Word to create the
emails. If an email is created using Plain text, no winmail.dat is
created. 
RTF and HTML emails are those you create that have formatting options,
like font styles, background colours, and text positioning, using the
formatting toolbar in Outlook. Plain text emails are those with just
text. 
If you are the one sending the winmail.dat attachments, follow these
simple rules to make sure you never do so again. 
*   In Outlook 2003, select Tools | Options. In the Options window
that appears select the Mail Format tab. 
*   Under the 'Message Format' heading, change 'Compose in this
message format' to Plain Text. Uncheck the 'Use Microsoft Office Word
2003 to edit e-mail messages' box. 
*   Click Ok. 
*   In Outlook 2000, select Tools | Options. In the Options window
that appears select the Mail Format tab. 
*   Under the 'Message Format' heading, change 'Send in this message
format' to Plain Text. Uncheck the 'Use Microsoft Word to edit email
messages' box. 
*   Click Ok. 
Switching email formats
If you want to decide which emails you send as Plain text and which not,
you can easily change the format of your emails as you create them. 
*In Outlook 2003, select File | New | Mail Message. 
*In the new message window that appears, select Format | Plain
Text. 
*The warning that appears tells you that you will lose all
formatting. This is what you want. Click Yes. 
Now you are ready to create a plain text message!
If you ever feel the need to create a more decorative email, and feel
that the plain text is just not cutting it, you can change the format
back to RTF or HTML. 
*   In the email composer Window, select Format | Rich Text or
Format | HTML. 
You can now make a beautiful email using the tools on the format
toolbars. 
 
From: Don Andrews [mailto:[E

RE: Blocking a whole domain

2008-09-11 Thread Joe Heaton
Can anyone tell me if that is the correct way of doing this?

Joe Heaton
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking a whole domain

I've been getting an increase of spam from .pl.  In order to block this
whole domain, would that be in the Sender Filtering of Global Settings
-> Message Delivery?

I put it in as [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Is that correct?

 

Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1662 - Release Date:
9/9/2008 10:47 AM

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Adding FE to Exchange 2003 Environment

2008-09-11 Thread Michael B. Smith
Connectors are scoped per administrative group and define within them the
servers that can use them.

 

Once you want to switch from the BE sending email to the FE sending email,
all you have to do is change that server. J

 

Outlook clients don't change. They always talk to a MAPI server, unless you
have RPC/HTTPS set up. In that case, you configure the profile to point to
the FE server.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Adding FE to Exchange 2003 Environment

 

Hello, 

 

AD 2003

Exchange 2003 SP2, Windows 2003 SP2

 

I have an existing Exchange 2003 hosting approximately 2000 mailboxes. I'll
be staging a FE server to leverage Exchange ActiveSync and eventually OWA,
as well as offload SMTP. I have a question regarding the initial
configuration.

 

Our existing server is configured to forward mail to a smarthost. We also
use an SMTP Connector to impose Delivery Restrictions on a specific security
group. When joining the second server to the organization, I'm assuming I
can hold off on selecting the option "this is a front-end server" which
should allow me to configure the appropriate relay settings on the SMTP
virtual server as well as configure the SMTP connector. When configuring the
SMTP connector, can I setup the address space for SMTP * and configure a
lower cost initially? Once I'm ready to make the switch, do I configure the
SMTP Virt Server and Connector to forward mail to the new front-end, switch
the cost within the address space on both servers, and go from there?

 

What about Outlook client connectivity internally? How would existing
outlook profiles know to communicate with the FE?

 

- Sean 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Troy Meyer
Sure, but the issue is keeping them from adding the permissions back.

So by default domain admin shouldn't have full access to all mailboxes, script 
the removal of all domain admins from mailbox perms and then create a mailbox 
admin group and add the folks that should have access. Then add that admin 
group to users with the mailbox permissions desired. Then finally audit 
permission changes to that group and individuals.

But if a domain admin is good and knows how to turn off or get around 
auditing.

-Troy


-Original Message-
From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Admins in Email

Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing
other people's email?

Thanks

Travis


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: internal winmail.dat issues..

2008-09-11 Thread Barsodi.John
We tried sending in different formats.  Seeing the problem on a OLK2003
and OLK2007 recipient.  I bounced the server last night, my MS TAM did
some digging on the MS internal KB and the only thing he found was
restart of services/reboot.  I'm awaiting the tests from the users in
question.  Not a fan of the "reboot" fix if this in fact fixes it.

 

- John Barsodi

From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: internal winmail.dat issues..

 

As I recall, the winmail.dat is the result of sending in Rich Text
format - any issues with recipients forcing a different viewing method
or not using word as editor, not having office2k3 - something like that?

 



From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: internal winmail.dat issues..

 

Anyone ever run into this?  User receives a TON of attachments from
internal users on the same Exchange server and other internal Exchange
servers.  About 1 out of  7 attachments make through correctly, the rest
come across as winmail.dat.  Majority of the attachments are in the
20+MB range and are usually graphics or video(yes yes, I'm on the same
page about not sending these type of files via email and they are
business related).  The users mailbox is currently @ 3.6GB.  I just had
a sender send one of these attachments through with the Message format
as Plain Text, no go.  This just started 3-4 weeks ago, no changes had
been made to the Exchange infrastructure.

 

Not finding much about this occurring with internal send and recipients.
I found two forum posts that 1)a reboot fixed 2)PSS hacking the IIS
metabase to fix.  Any other ideas.  I'm going to see about getting this
server rebooted tonight to try that'fix', but I'm hoping to find a
definitive fix.

 

Servers: Win2k3/EX2k3 SP2

Client: XP/OLK2003 SP3+

 

- John Barsodi

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

email disclaimer

2008-09-11 Thread Jeff Sparks
Can anyone help with this,

I am trying to set up a corporate email disclaimer with personal
signatures on exchange 2k3 sp2, I have a single server environment.  I
have found several suggestions including a script to incorporate message
in outgoing email,   It has also been suggested that  a simpler way to
do this is by using a third party tool such as CodeTwo.  We are a small
shop so cost is an issue.  Would anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jeff Sparks


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Take ownership of calendar items

2008-09-11 Thread Bingham, Kevin
Impossible for all practical intents.

 
-Original Message-
From: David L Herrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Take ownership of calendar items

IS it possible to Take ownership of calendar items where the organizer
no longer exists?

Exchange 2003

Tx

David


This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of the Names in the News company. Warning: Although
precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this
email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~




 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain 
privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from 
disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in error, please 
inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
printed copy.   Thank you. 



~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Re: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Alex Fontana
Domain Admins are explicitly denied sendas/receiveas (doesn't mean they
can't change that), but IMHO if they're not trusted they shouldn't be domain
admins...
-alex

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Travis Krampy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing
> other people's email?
>
> Thanks
>
> Travis
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Outlook 2007/Offline

2008-09-11 Thread Beckett, William (Bill)
Running Outlook 2007. When I go to File - drop down menu, the option to
work offline or go back online is missing, just gone. Any ideas why or
how to get it back?




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

SMTP Issues.

2008-09-11 Thread Stuart Tonge
Hi all, been awhile since I setup a new exchange server so I am a bit rusty..
In order to allow clients to access the server across the web via SMTP and POP3 
is there anything specific I need to do?

I have:
Enabled the POP & SMTP protocols & allowed access through the firewalls.


I can use POP3 and SMTP internally (on the LAN) and it works just fine, however 
one remote user is reporting error messages saying that relaying is disallowed.

My relay settings are: (on the SMTP protocol virtual server):
'allow all computers which successfully authenticate to relay, regardless of 
the list above'

however, this doesn't seem to work, nor does deselecting the above and manually 
specifying that the user is allowed to relay.

Even though adding by username doesn't seem to do anything, if I add the user's 
IP address to the 'allow relay' list then they can send normally. Unfortunately 
however, none of the users have static IP's.

I do not have any authentication enabled on this virtual server as it's the web 
facing SMTP handler.
Should I be using an additional SMTP V/S with authentication enabled for remote 
users who need to be able to relay?

Any advice or suggestions would be great!

Thanks, Stu.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Blackberry Question

2008-09-11 Thread Sascha Riela
Hi you can have two Mailboxes on one Blackberry. Ask your provider you need to 
add a service from it. Unfortunately I don't have a documentation, but I know 
it is possible.

Regards
Sascha

From: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 September 2008 00:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

Nah... one for the office and one for home, so he doesn't have to carry one 
back and forth... :)


From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

Maybe he needs to balance his belt w/ a BB on each side?



From: Fogarty, Richard R Mr CTR USA USASOC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question
Exactly my question - what exactly is his goal here?

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

What's the point? There is no "transition"
Did he change carriers and phone numbers as well?

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 8:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

wow maybe I can talk him out of it.

he does have two units so therefore 2 pins.

thanks all for the input

David


From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blackberry Question

I don't think it will function like that (only one pin per account as far as I 
know) but you could create a second account, have exchange deliver a copy to 
both mailboxes and connect the other BB to the secondary account.

John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+

From: David Ricci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry Question

I thought I would ask before I tried this.  I have a user that wants two 
blackberries.  "don't ask why,  he wants to transition to another unit"  anyway 
is it possible to have the same user with two different devices and receive 
email.  if so how.

I  have the new 4.1 sp6 with sql unit.

Thanks you.

David M. Ricci





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.

























This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain 
privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from 
disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform 
us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed 
copy. Thank you.



















~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

re: Messages dropped at categorizer

2008-09-11 Thread Nirav Doshi
I have similar issue. do you have any kind of scaning utility which scan your 
mail. i have a scan mail for exchange so i have a dought on that.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)
By default administrators are denied access to the individual mailboxes.
The admin would have to explicity set permissions to the store for him
to access the mailboxes and even then it would be recorded in the event
log. 


John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
Forward Operating Base Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8001
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium SatPhone - 717.633.3823
Roshain Mobile - 079 - 736 - 3832

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes
here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he
shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an
outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or
birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming
in every facet an American, and nothing but an American... There can be
no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but
something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one
flag, the American flag.. We have room for but one language here, and
that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole
loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Teddy Roosevelt; 1907


-Original Message-
From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Admins in Email

Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing
other people's email?

Thanks

Travis 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread Dahl, Peter

Access to all mailboxes from a Domain Administrator (DA) account is denied by 
default since Exchange 2000.  If your DA accounts have full access they likely 
followed this article to allow it.  You would have to reverse the steps to 
remove the access.

How to assign service account access to all mailboxes in Exchange Server 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/821897/en-us

Thanks,
   Peter Dahl.

-Original Message-
From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Admins in Email

Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing
other people's email?

Thanks

Travis


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) 
please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this 
communication from your system.  Failure to follow this process may be 
unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


Re: Blocking a whole domain

2008-09-11 Thread Eric Woodford
I think that will only block domains that have one pre-fix.

spammers.pl

not

my.spammers.pl

etc.


I believe you want

*.pl

no *@ before hand.

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Joe Heaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  I've been getting an increase of spam from .pl.  In order to block this
> whole domain, would that be in the Sender Filtering of Global Settings ->
> Message Delivery?
>
> I put it in as [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Is that correct?
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> AISA
>
> Employment Training Panel
>
> 1100 J Street, 4th Floor
>
> Sacramento, CA  95814
>
> (916) 327-5276
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Admins in Email

2008-09-11 Thread gsweers
By default 2003 and 2007 deny access to other email mailboxes unless you
specifically have removed the Deny permissions at the organization,
server, or mailbox store level.

-Original Message-
From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Admins in Email

Is there a way to restrict someone with Domain Admin access from viewing

other people's email?

Thanks

Travis 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


exchange 2003 with server 2008

2008-09-11 Thread Steve Ens
I've recently upgraded the domain to 08.  For some reason, the exchange tabs
in AD don't show up.  Is there something I need to add?  I'm guessing
installing the adminpak.msi will solve this...or does the exch03 pack work
with windows 2k8?

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Adding FE to Exchange 2003 Environment

2008-09-11 Thread Sean Martin
Hello,

AD 2003
Exchange 2003 SP2, Windows 2003 SP2

I have an existing Exchange 2003 hosting approximately 2000 mailboxes. I'll
be staging a FE server to leverage Exchange ActiveSync and eventually OWA,
as well as offload SMTP. I have a question regarding the initial
configuration.

Our existing server is configured to forward mail to a smarthost. We also
use an SMTP Connector to impose Delivery Restrictions on a specific security
group. When joining the second server to the organization, I'm assuming I
can hold off on selecting the option "this is a front-end server" which
should allow me to configure the appropriate relay settings on the SMTP
virtual server as well as configure the SMTP connector. When configuring the
SMTP connector, can I setup the address space for SMTP * and configure a
lower cost initially? Once I'm ready to make the switch, do I configure the
SMTP Virt Server and Connector on the existing server to forward mail to the
new front-end, switch the cost within the address space on both servers, and
go from there?

What about Outlook client connectivity internally? How would existing
outlook profiles know to communicate with the FE?

- Sean

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OWA opening without credentials on local LAN

2008-09-11 Thread Michael B. Smith
If you always want to have to authenticate, then you should disable
Integrated Windows Authentication. This will, whenever possible, cause you
to NOT have to authenticate; if the workstation is attached to the same
domain and the account is not a member of AdminSdHolder.

 

Insofar as "correct": that's a business decision, not a technical decision.
You can arguably have it set either way and be just fine.

 

Insofar as your "performance issue", I don't think you've described that; I
doubt it has to do with authentication.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Liby Philip Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA opening without credentials on local LAN

 

Hi Mike,

In exchange 2003, when I browsed the OWA using internal url, I used to see
OWA FBA screen.  But in Exchange 2007, I am automatically logged in.  When I
log in as Administrator to a client PC and issue the internal url to access
"MY" mailbox, I am prompted with a popup box for credential.  

Following your hint, on my Mailbox server, Directory security - IIS default
web site\owa is configured as both Windows integrated and Basic.  Is this
the correct configuration?.  On ISA I have configured the OWA listener -
Authentication - HTML form authentication and Windows (AD).  I also think
that somewhere here lies my OWA performance issue which is pathetic.

Hope you can help me with this?

Regards

Liby

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 4:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA opening without credentials on local LAN

 

I'm not sure you are describing a problem. Sounds like Integrated Windows
Authentication is turned on, and a password has been saved.

 

What do you see as an issue?

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Liby Philip Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 6:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA opening without credentials on local LAN

 

Dear All,

Identified another issue with my new Exchange 2007.  When I open OWA from my
profile with my local mail server url (kwmail.path.loc/owa), I am not
prompted for the for the credential.  On another PC, when I am logged in as
administrator and try the same url, I am prompted with a popup  for
credential

I am sure someone on the forum may have experience this.  Any help
appreciated.

Regards

Liby

 

  _  

Disclaimer - This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this
email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those
of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any
attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability
for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email

 

 

 

 

  _  

Disclaimer - This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this
email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those
of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any
attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability
for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

re: ActiveSync for Exchange Server 2003

2008-09-11 Thread Sham
Also... we only have one Exchange server. Is anyone else leveraging ActiveSync 
and Mobile Services in this kind of environment?

Again... Thanks.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Restoring a deleted exchange 2007 mailbox

2008-09-11 Thread Webster
 

 

From: Phil Marcum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: Restoring a deleted exchange 2007 mailbox

 

If I remove the mailbox and try to connect it I still don't see the user. 

Am I missing something?

 

Did you wait the MBS required two hours before getting stressed out?

 

Webster

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Phil Marcum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

A user's 2003 AD account and mailbox were deleted yesterday and I'm having a
"brain fart" in trying to restore the account from the exchange management
console. I expand Recipient Configuration, right-click Disconnected mailbox
and connect to the Exchange server. The deleted mailbox appears in the list
yet when I attempt to connect it I'm unable to locate it. If I look under
Receipient Configuration I see the mailbox listed. If I log in as the user
and open Outlook I don't see any of the items. So I'm wondering if I need to
remove this mailbox and then connect to it in order for the old mail to
appear? 

 

Any responses appreciated.


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Stopping an email user from sending to anyone outside of the organization?

2008-09-11 Thread Evan Brastow
Hi,

 

I'm wondering if someone could point me to a way to allow a user to send
email within the company, but not to any external addresses? We only
have one domain and one server (Exchange 2003 Enterprise), so it
shouldn't be too complicated, I would think...

 

Thank you,

 

Evan


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Helpdesk mailbox

2008-09-11 Thread Exchange (Sunbelt)
The issue will be with read / unread messages. Unless they access it from the 
same profile. Otherwise they may reply to the same messages.

S

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Helpdesk mailbox

Sorry about the delay on this, it was kind of a weird day yesterday.

This mailbox is named Help, but it's not really a "helpdesk" type of
situation.  Our agency works with businesses around California, helping
to fund the training/retraining of employees in order to make them a
better workforce for California.  This mailbox is going to be used by
our Fiscal department to provide assistance to these customers.  There
are two people at the start that will have access to it, with a
possibility of increasing that in the future.  Since the security group
idea was shot down, my only other idea is to create the user/mailbox and
give the users rights to it.  We have a helpdesk app, Track-It!, but I
can't see using that for this, as I don't want to add these Fiscal Unit
employees to the tech list.  They're bean counters, not IT.

Joe Heaton

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 3:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Helpdesk mailbox

Use a helpdesk system.



This almost certainly won't work the way they expect.



Regards,



Michael B. Smith

MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com



From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 6:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Helpdesk mailbox



I need to create a generic mailbox, that multiple people will be
accessing.
At first, I created a mail-enabled security group, and added the people
that
needed it to the group.  Now, I find that's not what they wanted.  They
want
an actual, separate mailbox, that these people will access, in addition
to
their own.  I need to verify that my thinking is correct here:



1) In order to do this, I have to create a new user within ADUC,
with a
mailbox. (Named Help, for example)

2) I then have to give the people that will be accessing this
mailbox
full rights to the mailbox.

3) I then need to go to their computers, and setup their Outlook to
open
this Help mailbox in addition to theirs.





Is this correct?  Is there a better way of doing this?



Thanks,



Joe Heaton

AISA

Employment Training Panel

1100 J Street, 4th Floor

Sacramento, CA  95814

(916) 327-5276

[EMAIL PROTECTED]








~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.16/1653 - Release Date:
9/5/2008 1:24 PM

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


RE: Blocking a whole domain

2008-09-11 Thread Exchange (Sunbelt)
You'd be better blocking it at the mail gateway or the smtp filter on your 
firewall.

S

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking a whole domain

I've been getting an increase of spam from .pl.  In order to block this whole 
domain, would that be in the Sender Filtering of Global Settings -> Message 
Delivery?
I put it in as [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Is that correct?

Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Blocking a whole domain

2008-09-11 Thread Chip Chuprinko
Joe:

I have a custom Country rule set up using a regular expression:

\.ru$|\.ar$|\.au$|\.at$|\.uk$|\.jo$|\.jp$|\.de$|\.lt$|\.dk$|\.pl$|\.nl$|\.be$|\.at$|\.uy$|\.ae$|\.br$|\.se$|\.cn$|\.ch$|\.cy$|\.tw$|\.kr$|\.it$|\.id$|\.in$|\.gr$|\.es$|\.cz$|\.pe$|\.pt$|\.hu$\.ua$|\.sk$|\.za$|\.pe$

This rule blocks all senders who have one of the items in the list as their 
final few characters of the email address.

Set the rule to delete the email. Add more countries using a |\.xx$  string. 
The | is a OR function (this or this or this or...). The backslash period (dot) 
says that the dot is literal, the xx is the 2 character country code (in your 
case pl) and the $ sign at the end says the .xx must be at the right end of the 
email address.

If you only have one country, then use \.pl$  in the expression line. Set the 
rule type to be regular expression.

I have a whole list of regular expressions for items dealing with sex, drugs, 
meds, sales, etc. Drops em out quick as a wink. The rule is to not put too many 
expressions in a string. I probably need to split my country rule into 3 or 4 
and alphabetize them to make it easy to check for dups.

Let me know if this works for ya...

Chip Chuprinko
Programming/Network Admin
--
Southwest Clean Air Agency

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking a whole domain

I've been getting an increase of spam from .pl.  In order to block this whole 
domain, would that be in the Sender Filtering of Global Settings -> Message 
Delivery?
I put it in as [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Is that correct?

Joe Heaton
AISA
Employment Training Panel
1100 J Street, 4th Floor
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 327-5276
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

  1   2   >