SMTP Banner
Good morning all, Exchange 2010 I've just been told that I have a discrepancy between our webmail record and SMTP banner. It returns 220 servername.domain.ca Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at date/time. Can I just use the Set-ReceiveConnector cmdlet to set webmail.domain.ca ? I'm just concerned that if I do that, that I may be affecting something else. TIA Cameron --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Do not resolve sender's display name for messages submitted over anonymous?
Did you ever find a answer to your question? H On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:46 PM, daemonR00t daemonr...@sysadmin-cr.comwrote: Hi, ** ** How do I set Exchange 2010 SP1 to not resolve sender's display name for messages submitted over anonymous connections from the Internet? http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997792(v=EXCHG.65).aspx Thanks! ** ** ~d --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Managing Activesync
Wondering what, if any, solutions people are using to manage, secure and control Activesync connections to their Exchange environments. We are looking at a product from Airwatch (http://www.air-watch.com/). == CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sending party by reply email, delete the email from your computer system and shred any paper copies. Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before using e-mail to communicate with us. See our Privacy Policy and Henry Ford My Health at www.henryford.com for more detailed information. If you do not believe that our policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, do not send e-mail or Internet communications to us. == --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
You'll need new certs on the 2010 CAS as that's where your clients will be connecting once you've transition your namespace. On my SAN certs I put server.fqdn, autodiscover.fqdn and the name of our OWA namespace. Cheers, Richard From: bounce-9390019-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-9390019-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Jason Benway Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I've been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven't been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I'm assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
Just done this, fun aint it :) We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I've been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven't been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I'm assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist -- MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I’ve been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven’t been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I’m assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
Sorry, just to confirm after reading Paul's email - we don't have legacy.fqdn on our certs as we didn't do a transition. We gave users a new name to access OWA etc. Richard From: bounce-9390028-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-9390028-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Sobey, Richard A Sent: 05 August 2011 15:40 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 You'll need new certs on the 2010 CAS as that's where your clients will be connecting once you've transition your namespace. On my SAN certs I put server.fqdn, autodiscover.fqdn and the name of our OWA namespace. Cheers, Richard From: bounce-9390019-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:bounce-9390019-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-9390019-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]mailto:[mailto:bounce-9390019-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Jason Benway Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I've been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven't been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I'm assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
Technically you need to have the names on the cert to make things work correctly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very pretty, and not recommended.. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I’ve been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven’t been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I’m assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Managing Activesync
We are evaluating a number of MDM solutions right now. I haven't gotten to Airwatch yet, but it is on the list. My favorite so far has been Zenprise. I like the way they use app tunnels. From: Rimmel, Carl [mailto:crimm...@hfhs.org] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Managing Activesync Wondering what, if any, solutions people are using to manage, secure and control Activesync connections to their Exchange environments. We are looking at a product from Airwatch (http://www.air-watch.com/). == CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sending party by reply email, delete the email from your computer system and shred any paper copies. Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before using e-mail to communicate with us. See our Privacy Policy and Henry Ford My Health at www.henryford.com for more detailed information. If you do not believe that our policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, do not send e-mail or Internet communications to us. == --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
Client devices mainly. I don't think Exchange itself cares, pretty sure IIRC that the cert wizard lets you tell it you want to use a wildcard cert, but we have a bunch of Nokia's and they don't seem to like wildcard certs as the onboard web browser bitches and moans about a name mismatch if you try and visit a site that uses our existing wildcard. From: Kurt Buff [kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I’ve been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven’t been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I’m assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
OK! That's good to know. We'll be switching from E2k3 to E2010 in the near future. Kinda sucks that our expensive wildcard cert won't be useful. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:55, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: Technically you need to have the names on the cert to make things work correctly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very pretty, and not recommended.. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I’ve been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven’t been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I’m assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
It's not recommended because it doesn't work on some phones. If all our phones support wildcard certs, it's just fine. I've got lots of clients installed with wildcard certs. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 OK! That's good to know. We'll be switching from E2k3 to E2010 in the near future. Kinda sucks that our expensive wildcard cert won't be useful. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:55, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: Technically you need to have the names on the cert to make things work correctly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very pretty, and not recommended.. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I’ve been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven’t been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I’m assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send
Resource question
Exchange 2007 Outlook 2007 Our resources are accepting meetings with Show As: set to Free, which is the default when they book full days. This, of course, is allowing the room to be doubled booked. (And yes, I know this is user edumication...but I've been told to fix it!) I've thought of changing the Work hours to 12:00 Am to 11:30 PM, and checking Allow scheduling only during working hours in the resource settings. But this isn't working. The resources are still accepting All Day Event bookings, with its default Free designation. So...two questions: Will Exchange take hours before the Allow scheduling only during working hours starts working; am I just not waiting long enough? And...am I missing a setting or way to make the Resources deny meetings with Show As set to Free? Larry C. Brown --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
Are iPhones OK with wildcard certs on E2k10? I've got our wildcard cert on the E2k3 servers in our overseas offices, and the iPhones they're using don't seem to have a problem with it - at least none have been reported to me. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:15, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: It's not recommended because it doesn't work on some phones. If all our phones support wildcard certs, it's just fine. I've got lots of clients installed with wildcard certs. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 OK! That's good to know. We'll be switching from E2k3 to E2010 in the near future. Kinda sucks that our expensive wildcard cert won't be useful. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:55, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: Technically you need to have the names on the cert to make things work correctly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very pretty, and not recommended.. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I’ve been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven’t been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I’m assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the
Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
I'm using a wildcard cert just fine. Exchange 2k10 with IPhones. On Friday, August 5, 2011, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Are iPhones OK with wildcard certs on E2k10? I've got our wildcard cert on the E2k3 servers in our overseas offices, and the iPhones they're using don't seem to have a problem with it - at least none have been reported to me. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:15, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: It's not recommended because it doesn't work on some phones. If all our phones support wildcard certs, it's just fine. I've got lots of clients installed with wildcard certs. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 OK! That's good to know. We'll be switching from E2k3 to E2010 in the near future. Kinda sucks that our expensive wildcard cert won't be useful. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:55, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: Technically you need to have the names on the cert to make things work correctly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very pretty, and not recommended.. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
This is good to hear - we're already using a wildcard cert and so far no issues with the Android phones that our people are using. Phones seem to be the 'only' area where a wildcard cert can cause problems? Sean Rector, MCSE -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 It's not recommended because it doesn't work on some phones. If all our phones support wildcard certs, it's just fine. I've got lots of clients installed with wildcard certs. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 OK! That's good to know. We'll be switching from E2k3 to E2010 in the near future. Kinda sucks that our expensive wildcard cert won't be useful. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:55, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: Technically you need to have the names on the cert to make things work correctly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very pretty, and not recommended.. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I’ve been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven’t been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I’m assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here:
Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
Very good to hear. Thanks for that. On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:47, Harry Singh hbo...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using a wildcard cert just fine. Exchange 2k10 with IPhones. On Friday, August 5, 2011, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Are iPhones OK with wildcard certs on E2k10? I've got our wildcard cert on the E2k3 servers in our overseas offices, and the iPhones they're using don't seem to have a problem with it - at least none have been reported to me. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:15, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: It's not recommended because it doesn't work on some phones. If all our phones support wildcard certs, it's just fine. I've got lots of clients installed with wildcard certs. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 OK! That's good to know. We'll be switching from E2k3 to E2010 in the near future. Kinda sucks that our expensive wildcard cert won't be useful. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:55, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: Technically you need to have the names on the cert to make things work correctly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very pretty, and not recommended.. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
It requires a bit more config (one extra powershell command), but that is the only issue I have ever seen. Sent from my HTC Tilt™ 2, a Windows® phone from ATT -Original Message- From: Sean Rector sean.rec...@vaopera.org Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 This is good to hear - we're already using a wildcard cert and so far no issues with the Android phones that our people are using. Phones seem to be the 'only' area where a wildcard cert can cause problems? Sean Rector, MCSE -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 It's not recommended because it doesn't work on some phones. If all our phones support wildcard certs, it's just fine. I've got lots of clients installed with wildcard certs. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 OK! That's good to know. We'll be switching from E2k3 to E2010 in the near future. Kinda sucks that our expensive wildcard cert won't be useful. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:55, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: Technically you need to have the names on the cert to make things work correctly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very pretty, and not recommended.. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I’ve been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven’t been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I’m assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us
RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
Yes. Some nokia, winmo prior to v6, older palms, etc. Have problems, but very little 'current' equipment. Sent from my HTC Tilt™ 2, a Windows® phone from ATT -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 Are iPhones OK with wildcard certs on E2k10? I've got our wildcard cert on the E2k3 servers in our overseas offices, and the iPhones they're using don't seem to have a problem with it - at least none have been reported to me. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:15, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: It's not recommended because it doesn't work on some phones. If all our phones support wildcard certs, it's just fine. I've got lots of clients installed with wildcard certs. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 OK! That's good to know. We'll be switching from E2k3 to E2010 in the near future. Kinda sucks that our expensive wildcard cert won't be useful. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:55, KevinM kev...@wlkmmas.org wrote: Technically you need to have the names on the cert to make things work correctly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very pretty, and not recommended.. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is there a technical advantage? On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com, mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com. We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our reverse proxy for SSL inspection). This is what I have in my notes for KB937031: Steps to enable Integrated Windows Authentication after you install hotfix 937031 on the Exchange 2003 back-end server To work around this problem, turn on Integrated Windows Authentication. To do this, follow these steps: Start Exchange System Manager. Expand Administrative Groups, expand Administrative_Group_Name, and then expand Servers. Expand Your_Server_Name, expand Protocols, and then expand HTTP. Expand Exchange Virtual Server, right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Access tab, and then click Authentication. Click to select the Integrated Windows Authentication check box. Click OK two times. To verify that this successfully replicated to the metabase on the Exchange server, follow these steps: Open the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager under Administrative Tools. Expand the Computer, expand Web Sites, and then expand Default Web Site. Right-click Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync, and then click Properties. Click the Directory Security tab, and then select the Edit button under Authentication and access control. Verify that the Integrated Windows Authentication check box is selected. Note If this check box is selected, you have successfully replicated the change that was made in the Exchange System Manager to the metabase on the Exchange server. Click Cancel two times, and then exit Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager. You can now test synching with your mobile device. From: Jason Benway [mailto:benw...@jsjcorp.com] Sent: 05 August 2011 15:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010 I’ve been doing A LOT of reading. One thing I haven’t been able to find is where the new cert needs to be installed. I’m assuming its on the CAS, exchange 2003 FE and exchange 2003 mbx servers? Should I also put the internal names on the SAN cert? or just the external DNS names? What about the hotfix kb937031 does that go on all exchange 2003 servers? Or just the FE? Thanks,jb --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail
RE: Room Booking - All Day Events
By default, the booking attendant will not double book. You can double book, but to do it you have to go in and explicitly change the Allowconflicts setting from the default of $false to $true, and set the ConflictPercentageAllowed and MaximumConflictInstances, using the set-calendarprocessing cmdlet. You can end up with double bookings if you give users full access to the calendar and they manually add the appointments to the calendar. The AllowConflicts only applies to the behavior of the Booking Attendant. It doesn't apply a restriction to the calendar itself. From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Room Booking - All Day Events Just after a sanity check that I'm not missing anything here - on Exchange 2010 if I setup a room/equipment mailbox and use the booking attendant, it seems that if I send a meeting request from Outlook as an all day event with the default of show as free, the book attendant automatically marks the time in the room/equipment calendar as busy, which is obviously sensible. I just want to be sure that I haven't overlooked anything and that there are no circumstances, regardless of client version, where a booking will show as free in the calendar of the resource? Essentially, can you still double-book using the booking attendant and Exchange 2010 SP1 RU3v3? Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Room Booking - All Day Events
Thanks Rob, that is what I would expect, but there's been a couple of things the attendant does that don't tie in with what I'd have expected. Presumably the same thing goes for the all-day event scenario - the attendant will always set the show as to busy even if the user leaves Outlook on the default? All of my test booking seem to confirm this but a second opinion would be great. From: Campbell, Rob [rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: 05 August 2011 7:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Room Booking - All Day Events By default, the booking attendant will not double book. You can double book, but to do it you have to go in and explicitly change the Allowconflicts setting from the default of $false to $true, and set the ConflictPercentageAllowed and MaximumConflictInstances, using the set-calendarprocessing cmdlet. You can end up with double bookings if you give users full access to the calendar and they manually add the appointments to the calendar. The AllowConflicts only applies to the behavior of the Booking Attendant. It doesn’t apply a restriction to the calendar itself. From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Room Booking - All Day Events Just after a sanity check that I’m not missing anything here – on Exchange 2010 if I setup a room/equipment mailbox and use the booking attendant, it seems that if I send a meeting request from Outlook as an “all day event” with the default of “show as free”, the book attendant automatically marks the time in the room/equipment calendar as busy, which is obviously sensible. I just want to be sure that I haven’t overlooked anything and that there are no circumstances, regardless of client version, where a booking will show as “free” in the calendar of the resource? Essentially, can you still double-book using the booking attendant and Exchange 2010 SP1 RU3v3? Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Room Booking - All Day Events
I've never seen it stated explicitly that it does change it for an all day event, but I can't imagine the thing working reliably at all if it doesn't. Even if the booking attendant wouldn't allow the double booking, the resource would still be showing up as available in a free busy search, and users would be trying to reserve it and complaining when it showed available, but then denied their request. From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Room Booking - All Day Events Thanks Rob, that is what I would expect, but there's been a couple of things the attendant does that don't tie in with what I'd have expected. Presumably the same thing goes for the all-day event scenario - the attendant will always set the show as to busy even if the user leaves Outlook on the default? All of my test booking seem to confirm this but a second opinion would be great. From: Campbell, Rob [rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: 05 August 2011 7:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Room Booking - All Day Events By default, the booking attendant will not double book. You can double book, but to do it you have to go in and explicitly change the Allowconflicts setting from the default of $false to $true, and set the ConflictPercentageAllowed and MaximumConflictInstances, using the set-calendarprocessing cmdlet. You can end up with double bookings if you give users full access to the calendar and they manually add the appointments to the calendar. The AllowConflicts only applies to the behavior of the Booking Attendant. It doesn't apply a restriction to the calendar itself. From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]mailto:[mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Room Booking - All Day Events Just after a sanity check that I'm not missing anything here - on Exchange 2010 if I setup a room/equipment mailbox and use the booking attendant, it seems that if I send a meeting request from Outlook as an all day event with the default of show as free, the book attendant automatically marks the time in the room/equipment calendar as busy, which is obviously sensible. I just want to be sure that I haven't overlooked anything and that there are no circumstances, regardless of client version, where a booking will show as free in the calendar of the resource? Essentially, can you still double-book using the booking attendant and Exchange 2010 SP1 RU3v3? Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 100 1464 84 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
Re: Managing Activesync
Sorry to say that we're abandoning Good's technology, and going with plain Activesync. I was very opposed to it, but the iPhone fanatics hated it, and never gave it a good chance. I suppose we'll get something else once we have a major breach. Kurt On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:53, Don Andrews don.andr...@safeway.com wrote: Not directly involved but I understand we are looking at Airwatch as well. From: Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Fri Aug 05 09:14:05 2011 Subject: RE: Managing Activesync We are evaluating a number of MDM solutions right now. I haven’t gotten to Airwatch yet, but it is on the list. My favorite so far has been Zenprise. I like the way they use app tunnels. From: Rimmel, Carl [mailto:crimm...@hfhs.org] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Managing Activesync Wondering what, if any, solutions people are using to manage, secure and control Activesync connections to their Exchange environments. We are looking at a product from Airwatch (http://www.air-watch.com/). == CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sending party by reply email, delete the email from your computer system and shred any paper copies. Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before using e-mail to communicate with us. See our Privacy Policy and Henry Ford My Health at www.henryford.com for more detailed information. If you do not believe that our policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, do not send e-mail or Internet communications to us. == --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Resource question
Well...I think I found out why Allow scheduling only during working hours isn't working. http://www.mskbarticles.com/index.php?kb=2479939 Still wondering though...shouldn't Resources automatically put entries in as Busy? Am I missing something somewhere? Larry From: Brown, Larry [mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Resource question Exchange 2007 Outlook 2007 Our resources are accepting meetings with Show As: set to Free, which is the default when they book full days. This, of course, is allowing the room to be doubled booked. (And yes, I know this is user edumication...but I've been told to fix it!) I've thought of changing the Work hours to 12:00 Am to 11:30 PM, and checking Allow scheduling only during working hours in the resource settings. But this isn't working. The resources are still accepting All Day Event bookings, with its default Free designation. So...two questions: Will Exchange take hours before the Allow scheduling only during working hours starts working; am I just not waiting long enough? And...am I missing a setting or way to make the Resources deny meetings with Show As set to Free? Larry C. Brown --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Resource question
If you're using the resource AutoAccept it should, unless you've got it set to allow conflicts. If the users have full rights to the calendar and are using direct booking, they're bypassing the agent and putting the appointment directly onto the calendar, and the agent never gets a chance to change the free busy status. From: Brown, Larry [mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Resource question Well...I think I found out why Allow scheduling only during working hours isn't working. http://www.mskbarticles.com/index.php?kb=2479939 Still wondering though...shouldn't Resources automatically put entries in as Busy? Am I missing something somewhere? Larry From: Brown, Larry [mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com]mailto:[mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Resource question Exchange 2007 Outlook 2007 Our resources are accepting meetings with Show As: set to Free, which is the default when they book full days. This, of course, is allowing the room to be doubled booked. (And yes, I know this is user edumication...but I've been told to fix it!) I've thought of changing the Work hours to 12:00 Am to 11:30 PM, and checking Allow scheduling only during working hours in the resource settings. But this isn't working. The resources are still accepting All Day Event bookings, with its default Free designation. So...two questions: Will Exchange take hours before the Allow scheduling only during working hours starts working; am I just not waiting long enough? And...am I missing a setting or way to make the Resources deny meetings with Show As set to Free? Larry C. Brown --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Resource question
2010 here but a big fat this. /Looking at a few users here who will never understand. ::grumble:: From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 4:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Resource question If you're using the resource AutoAccept it should, unless you've got it set to allow conflicts. If the users have full rights to the calendar and are using direct booking, they're bypassing the agent and putting the appointment directly onto the calendar, and the agent never gets a chance to change the free busy status. From: Brown, Larry [mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Resource question Well...I think I found out why Allow scheduling only during working hours isn't working. http://www.mskbarticles.com/index.php?kb=2479939 Still wondering though...shouldn't Resources automatically put entries in as Busy? Am I missing something somewhere? Larry From: Brown, Larry [mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com]mailto:[mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Resource question Exchange 2007 Outlook 2007 Our resources are accepting meetings with Show As: set to Free, which is the default when they book full days. This, of course, is allowing the room to be doubled booked. (And yes, I know this is user edumication...but I've been told to fix it!) I've thought of changing the Work hours to 12:00 Am to 11:30 PM, and checking Allow scheduling only during working hours in the resource settings. But this isn't working. The resources are still accepting All Day Event bookings, with its default Free designation. So...two questions: Will Exchange take hours before the Allow scheduling only during working hours starts working; am I just not waiting long enough? And...am I missing a setting or way to make the Resources deny meetings with Show As set to Free? Larry C. Brown --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Resource question
Do you get about 4 dozen old reminders popping up like you just cleared the deck in Solitaire when you open one of those resource calendars? From: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 3:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Resource question 2010 here but a big fat this. /Looking at a few users here who will never understand. ::grumble:: From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]mailto:[mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 4:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Resource question If you're using the resource AutoAccept it should, unless you've got it set to allow conflicts. If the users have full rights to the calendar and are using direct booking, they're bypassing the agent and putting the appointment directly onto the calendar, and the agent never gets a chance to change the free busy status. From: Brown, Larry [mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com]mailto:[mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Resource question Well...I think I found out why Allow scheduling only during working hours isn't working. http://www.mskbarticles.com/index.php?kb=2479939 Still wondering though...shouldn't Resources automatically put entries in as Busy? Am I missing something somewhere? Larry From: Brown, Larry [mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com]mailto:[mailto:lc.br...@dplinc.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Resource question Exchange 2007 Outlook 2007 Our resources are accepting meetings with Show As: set to Free, which is the default when they book full days. This, of course, is allowing the room to be doubled booked. (And yes, I know this is user edumication...but I've been told to fix it!) I've thought of changing the Work hours to 12:00 Am to 11:30 PM, and checking Allow scheduling only during working hours in the resource settings. But this isn't working. The resources are still accepting All Day Event bookings, with its default Free designation. So...two questions: Will Exchange take hours before the Allow scheduling only during working hours starts working; am I just not waiting long enough? And...am I missing a setting or way to make the Resources deny meetings with Show As set to Free? Larry C. Brown --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe
RE: Do not resolve sender's display name for messages submitted over anonymous?
Not yet L From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 8:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Do not resolve sender's display name for messages submitted over anonymous? Did you ever find a answer to your question? H On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:46 PM, daemonR00t daemonr...@sysadmin-cr.com wrote: Hi, How do I set Exchange 2010 SP1 to not resolve sender's display name for messages submitted over anonymous connections from the Internet? http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997792(v=EXCHG.65).aspx Thanks! ~d --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: SMTP Banner
That's exactly what I've done a few times and no one got hurt J From: Cameron [mailto:cameron.orl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 8:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SMTP Banner Good morning all, Exchange 2010 I've just been told that I have a discrepancy between our webmail record and SMTP banner. It returns 220 servername.domain.ca Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at date/time. Can I just use the Set-ReceiveConnector cmdlet to set webmail.domain.ca ? I'm just concerned that if I do that, that I may be affecting something else. TIA Cameron --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
