RE: Exchange SMTP Routing

2001-11-09 Thread Andrew Duey

Paranoid?
 
--Andrew Duey, MCSE
 
-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing
 
We use NAV for gateways as a mail relay that sends to exchange running
antigen and then to the desktops with nav CE 
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager 
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Why don't they just make mouse flavored cat food? -- Steven Wright 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: Leblanc, Shawn [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:08 PM 
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
 Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing 
 
 
 I agree - without exception. 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: Drewski [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:44 PM 
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
 Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing 
 
 
 NT Servers can be just as secure as Unix servers, if you 
 apply the proper patches.  You do apply the proper patches, don't you?

 
 -- Drew 
  
 Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now! 
 TEN THINGS YOU CAN DO TO PREVENT WAR 
 http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11597 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:37 PM 
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
 Subject: RE: Exchange SMTP Routing 
 
 
 Are you sure you want to put NT machines on the firewall?  
 Shouldn't there be UNIX machines there for better security? 
 
 -- 
 Matt Lathrum 
 General Dynamics Decision Systems 
  When cryptography is outlawed, 
  bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. 
 
  -Original Message- 
 From: Leblanc, Shawn [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:53 AM 
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
 Subject:  Exchange SMTP Routing 
 
 Currently we run; 
 
 Exchange 5.5 SP4 
 WinNT4.0 Sp 6A 
 
 We also currently have our mail routed to us and 
 scanned\filtered  by an outside company which costs $$.  We 
 are looking at building a server that just does SMTP 
 relay\filtering\scanning and put it in our DMZ.  We are also 
 looking at putting Trend virus scanning on the box so that 
 our mail is scanned by two different AntiVirus companies 
 before delivered to the users desktops.  Our logic behind 
 this is sometimes Trend comes out with a pattern a little 
 quicker than Symantec, so we do both.  We also do attachment 
 filtering with Norton For Exchange. 
 
 I guess I have a couple of questions about this; 
 
 1. What is everyone else using for SMTP relay.  What 
 software, location of server, etc. 
 
 2. What is the best SMTP relay software\hardware?  Should I 
 just use another install of Exchange on a regular server`? 
 
 Any suggestions or relevant web sites will be greatly appreciated. 
 
 Regards, 
 Shawn 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ 
 at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt- software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ 
 at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: NT 4 120 day eval situation

2001-10-31 Thread Andrew Duey

I think you just need to Upgrade this machine with a regular full
version of NT4 (make sure it has SP6 in it).

The upgrade will update the binaries to current versions but leave
your configuration in place.

--Andrew Duey, MCSE

-Original Message-
From: Schatz, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: NT 4 120 day eval situation

Hy,

i have a NT 4 (SP6a) server with MXS 5.5 (SP4) running on it. Lucky as i
am
the server suddenly thinks it´s a 120 eval box and reboots every 2
hours.
Having a look at Q173507 i´m not too happy with this solution. Has
anyone
used http://www.algintech.com/UTools/UDeploy.asp to solve this situation
?

Thanks a lot
 


This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is
confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000

2001-10-18 Thread Andrew Duey

Run the other way!  I did a fair amount of reading and preparing and my
migration to Exchange 2k is going over like a lead ballon.  I'm just
thankful that I've got new hardware that doesn't have to go into
production immediatly.
 
Also, make sure you have a few support incidents, I did everything by
the book (according to the MS engineer) and I still spend 8 hours on the
phone with a MS tech and another 3 days trying to clear the problems up!
 
--Andrew Duey, MCSE

-Original Message-
From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000


Hi Guys
I am in the process of planning our migration from Exchange 5.5 to
Exchange 2000 - I have finished migrating our domain to Active Directory
and that all went pretty smoothly, but there were a few gotchas not
mentioned in any documentation and MS's way of doing things is sometimes
a little questionable.
I thought before I jump into the fire I would put this out so I don't
have to pull out as much hair as some of you may have ;-) It is only a
single site with around 100 users with huge volumes of mail.
Your advice would be very appreciated.
Cheers
__
Regards
Simon Taylor 
Senior Systems Administrator
? [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*   020 7539 6808
*   0780 1104 170
communication contains information that is confidential and may also be
privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If
you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any
distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in
it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies
of it. 
 
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm