RE: mail continuity services

2013-04-15 Thread Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan
Funny, I just talked to Dell services about MessageLabs today.
It looks really interesting.
From my understanding, the way it works is:

For inbound, you have a lower priority MX record that points to messagelabs. 
You can select to manually activate continuity or for it to automatically kick 
over.

For outbound(in a disaster), there's an outlook plugin that will detect your 
exchange servers are down and will apparently connect to message labs without 
any reconfiguration? Alternatively there's an OWA style web interface.

There's an AD sync tool that replicates new user add/removes to 
messagelabs(just usernames, not passwords) so new users are setup automatically.

It does seem pricey though.

There's also MXLogic. Their spam solution includes a continuity piece. It 
doesn't seem as robust as messagelabs. I think it's simply an OWA style 
interface, nothing else. MXLogic is far cheaper though.
I also know of a local consulting firm who uses office365 as a backup to their 
exchange server, but I haven't looked into how they're doing it.

Curious if anyone has heard of other solutions or has firsthand experience with 
any of there.


Thanks,
Jon
[cid:image001.png@01CDE9CA.0D1A37A0]

Jon Derrenbacker | CISSP | Systems Engineer | Manager | Keiter
4401 Dominion Boulevard, 2nd Floor, Glen Allen, VA 23060
phone: 804-273-6221 | fax: 804-747-3632 | 
keitercpa.comhttp://www.keitercpa.com/

Experience |  Knowledge | Relationships | Insight
Note: This communication, including any attachments, may contain privileged or 
other confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or 
believe you have received this communication in error, do not print, copy, 
retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information contained within.  
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email 
and destroy all copies of the original message.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by 
the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication 
(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot 
be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any penalties under the Internal 
Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any 
transaction(s) or tax-related matter(s) addressed herein.





From: Jean-Paul N [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: mail continuity services

Hi all,

Was curious to know what services you maybe using for email continuity-

years back i recall message labs provided that service- does anyone have any 
experience with any others?









  TIA

JP
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
or send an email to
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
or send an email to 
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.png

RE: mail continuity services

2013-04-15 Thread Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan
Here's the rep I was talking to: Geoff 404-639-9223
I was quoted $34/user per year!!!



From: Jean-Paul N [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 4:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mail continuity services

Can you get me # to speak to an actual rep? , I tried calling and got transfer 
from India to Latin America - then I hung up-
I filled out the call me back on their website , and I'm still waiting.

Another provider offers that same service, but it must be used in conjunction 
with the mail filtering, , with a minimum of 25 users all said and done 7 
dollars a mailbox (NO WAYYY)











Jean-Paul Natola



From: jderrenbac...@keitercpa.commailto:jderrenbac...@keitercpa.com
To: 
exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: mail continuity services
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:16:17 +
Funny, I just talked to Dell services about MessageLabs today.
It looks really interesting.
From my understanding, the way it works is:

For inbound, you have a lower priority MX record that points to messagelabs. 
You can select to manually activate continuity or for it to automatically kick 
over.

For outbound(in a disaster), there's an outlook plugin that will detect your 
exchange servers are down and will apparently connect to message labs without 
any reconfiguration? Alternatively there's an OWA style web interface.

There's an AD sync tool that replicates new user add/removes to 
messagelabs(just usernames, not passwords) so new users are setup automatically.

It does seem pricey though.

There's also MXLogic. Their spam solution includes a continuity piece. It 
doesn't seem as robust as messagelabs. I think it's simply an OWA style 
interface, nothing else. MXLogic is far cheaper though.
I also know of a local consulting firm who uses office365 as a backup to their 
exchange server, but I haven't looked into how they're doing it.

Curious if anyone has heard of other solutions or has firsthand experience with 
any of there.


Thanks,
Jon
[cid:image001.png@01CDE9CA.0D1A37A0]

Jon Derrenbacker | CISSP | Systems Engineer | Manager | Keiter
4401 Dominion Boulevard, 2nd Floor, Glen Allen, VA 23060
phone: 804-273-6221 | fax: 804-747-3632 | 
keitercpa.comhttp://www.keitercpa.com/

Experience |  Knowledge | Relationships | Insight
Note: This communication, including any attachments, may contain privileged or 
other confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or 
believe you have received this communication in error, do not print, copy, 
retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information contained within.  
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email 
and destroy all copies of the original message.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by 
the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication 
(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot 
be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding any penalties under the Internal 
Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any 
transaction(s) or tax-related matter(s) addressed herein.





From: Jean-Paul N [mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: mail continuity services

Hi all,

Was curious to know what services you maybe using for email continuity-

years back i recall message labs provided that service- does anyone have any 
experience with any others?









  TIA

JP
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
or send an email to
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
or send an email to
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
or send an email to
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
or send an email to 
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelistinline: image001.png

RE: ios6.1 woes

2013-02-14 Thread Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan
It would be nice to have an ETA from Apple so I can make the decision on what 
to do.
Is it 24 hours away or 24 days away?

I heard 6.1 also makes iPhone users passwords irrelevant.



From: Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ios6.1 woes

Apple has identified a fix and will make it available in an upcoming software 
update
Ref: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4532

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
TO the best of my knowledge, that information is not public.

From: Kleciak, Clint D A7IT 
[mailto:clint.klec...@cigna.commailto:clint.klec...@cigna.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ios6.1 woes

Anyone know if this effects 2007 as well or is it just 2010.  I only see 
reference to 2010.

thanks

___
Clint Kleciak


Confidential, unpublished property of CIGNA. Do not duplicate or distribute. 
Use and distribution limited solely to authorized personnel. (c) Copyright 2013 
CIGNA


From: Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ios6.1 woes

I believe they're working on it and will have a fix when it's ready like iOS 
4.0.1 which fixed a similar issue.

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Kuehn, Shannon 
sku...@gemrc.commailto:sku...@gemrc.com wrote:
Yes but it still showed up on American phones.  4S and 5 in Chicago that I 
witnessed.

Apple is not promising a fix and they're offering no comment.  Just annoying...


From: Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.commailto:sms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:16 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ios6.1 woes

I don't believe Apple promised a fix for the Exchange logging issue in 6.1.1.
I believe it was only targeted for the European connection problem.
The ZDNet article referred to in Steve Ens' blog confirms that: 
http://www.zdnet.com/apple-releases-ios-6-1-1-after-eu-network-bugs-711140/

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Kuehn, Shannon 
sku...@gemrc.commailto:sku...@gemrc.com wrote:
You are correct.  Totally bogus that Apple has yet to truthfully address such a 
flaw.  I think I was really optimistic it took care of the Exchange issue.


From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.commailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:30 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ios6.1 woes

D'oh!

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
I've confirmed. 6.1.1 does NOT address this issue.

From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.commailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:54 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ios6.1 woes

http://thoughtsofanidlemind.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/ios6-activesync/

The link here would disagree, but maybe they have released something more in 
the last 12 hours...

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Kuehn, Shannon 
sku...@gemrc.commailto:sku...@gemrc.com wrote:
Call me crazy (many do), but I saw it with my own eyes on 2 iPhone 5 phones.


From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.commailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:35 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ios6.1 woes

The fix  is only for the 4s.  No other phone is getting it currently

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Dan Hyatt 
d...@danhyatt.commailto:d...@danhyatt.com wrote:
I actually installed it on my Verizon iphone 4S.

So far so good.
 From: mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com

 To: 
 exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 Subject: RE: ios6.1 woes
 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:47:51 +


 6.1.1 is a VodaPhone fix. That's all :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.commailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 5:57 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: ios6.1 woes

 Not showing for me yet

 Kurt

 On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Kuehn, Shannon 
 sku...@gemrc.commailto:sku...@gemrc.com wrote:
  Have your users go into Settings, General, Software Update. Make sure
  they're connected via wi-fi and you will see 6.1.1 in the update queue.
  Have them download + install and hopefully (*fingers crossed*)
  everything is back to normal come tomorrow.
 
 
 
 
 
  From: Peter Sam [mailto:srir...@hotmail.commailto:srir...@hotmail.com]
  Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 4:11 PM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: ios6.1 woes
 
 
 
  Hmm sort of..
 
 
 
  This will delete the full ActiveSync functionality. I was looking to
  see if we can just disable the Calendar portion only..
 
 
 
  So, users will still be able to get email on their iphones but they
  wont be able to accept any new invites (the ones that cause the rapid log 
  growth).
 
  
 
  From: 
  

RE: Exchange ActiveSync not forcing encryption on Androids???

2011-06-17 Thread Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan
Thanks Carl. I found this:
Exchange correctly sends the policy to the device. The device accepts
the policy and discards the pieces it doesn't understand. It doesn't
report that it refuses the entire policy so it's still provisioned.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvrtransport/thread/c81ee66a-7cb0-4ef2-865c-2cd505847087/

At least I now know it's not just me... It seems really troublesome though.
How is everyone else blocking non-encrypted devices???


Jon


On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com wrote:
 Androids lie.  Google Android Activesync policies.



 Carl



From: Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:15 AM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Subject: Exchange ActiveSync not forcing encryption on Androids???

Has anyone had issues where androids can sync even though your activesync 
policy says it requires encryption?

I would think if my activesync policy says it requires encryption, and androids 
don't have encryption, they shouldn't be able to pull down email?


Environment:
Exchange 2010/2003(coexistence) - Mailboxes in questions are on 2010
HTC EVO and Incredible running android 2.3.3 and 2.2
Default Android Mail app.

Activesync settings(Exchange 2010):
- Allow non-provisional devices is UNCHECKED
- Require encryption on device is CHECKED
- Misc other password settings are selected.


I made a forensics image of my android(after mounting it as a disk), scanned it 
with EnCase, and I can see my emails in plain text.


Any ideas?

Thanks,
Jon





---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Exchange auto-delete -- keeping too many months

2010-05-14 Thread Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan
I setup an exchange email recipient policy to delete emails older than
90 days on my exchange 2003 box. 
The weird thing is it seems to be keeping 120 days instead of 90. Almost
exactly 1 extra month.
Has anyone seen this before? 

I know when you forward, or reply it changes the time stamp, but the
example emails I have are in my sent items and haven't been touched
since they were originally sent.

Thoughts/ideas?


Here's a screenshot of said policy:
http://i42.tinypic.com/13z669e.jpg

There's a KB, KB302804, that talks about how exchange calculates email
age, but I'm not seeing the answer there.
I used KB, KB319188, to create the policy, and I've re-read it a few
times, and it looks like everyone was done correctly...


Thanks,
Jon