RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client

2002-07-17 Thread Harty, Dave

I'm using 3.5.2b and getting the same results. Mine will not find the server
first time around, so I retry the server and then it takes several minutes
to sync. It is worse depending on the amount of email as well. On Cisco's
networking pro forum there are several messages concerning this issue. They
mentioned fiddling with the rpc arrangement in the registry or the mtu's on
the vpn client neither of which worked for me. I hadn't seen the fix you
mentioned for ini file. I tried to get back to the forums to get more info
but they aren't working correctly at the moment.

 --
 From: David Elebute
 Reply To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:17 AM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
 
 Has anyone experienced the synchronization problem w/Outlook 2000 and
 Cisco's VPN client V 3.5.2 C? It is hanging up attempting to synchronize
 with our Exchange 5.5 Servers. Cisco delivered a fix; add
 OutlookNotify=1
 to VPNClient.ini file in the program installation directory, but I tried
 it
 and still did not solve the problem. Besides upgrading to Outlook 2002,
 has
 anyone been able resolve this problem? All responses are greatly
 appreciated.  
 
 David Elebute
 Director of MIS
 SuperClubs
 
 
  
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client

2002-07-17 Thread Harty, Dave

David,

Thanks for Cisco bug ref. I'm talking to them now about this but since the
CSE hasn't even mentioned the info in this thread, I'd better not get my
hopes up.

 --
 From: David Elebute
 Reply To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:14 AM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
 
 On the Cisco site the bug is: CSCdu36579, I am going to try 3.5.1 again. I
 actually can work in Outlook if I stay out of the inbox and do not try to
 sync; great choices heh?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Harty, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:09 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
 
 I'm using 3.5.2b and getting the same results. Mine will not find the
 server
 first time around, so I retry the server and then it takes several minutes
 to sync. It is worse depending on the amount of email as well. On Cisco's
 networking pro forum there are several messages concerning this issue.
 They
 mentioned fiddling with the rpc arrangement in the registry or the mtu's
 on
 the vpn client neither of which worked for me. I hadn't seen the fix you
 mentioned for ini file. I tried to get back to the forums to get more info
 but they aren't working correctly at the moment.
 
  --
  From: David Elebute
  Reply To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:17 AM
  To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject:  MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
 
  Has anyone experienced the synchronization problem w/Outlook 2000 and
  Cisco's VPN client V 3.5.2 C? It is hanging up attempting to synchronize
  with our Exchange 5.5 Servers. Cisco delivered a fix; add
  OutlookNotify=1
  to VPNClient.ini file in the program installation directory, but I tried
  it
  and still did not solve the problem. Besides upgrading to Outlook 2002,
  has
  anyone been able resolve this problem? All responses are greatly
  appreciated. 
 
  David Elebute
  Director of MIS
  SuperClubs
 
 
  
 
  List Charter and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Mac Clients

2002-07-17 Thread Harty, Dave

Ken,

This article mentions some possible future mail options for Mac users.
Basically, MS might add Exchange access to Entourage or produce an OSX
version of Outlook.

http://news.com.com/2100-1040-944313.html?tag=fd_top



 --
 From: Ken Leyba
 Reply To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:21 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  Mac Clients
 
 We're using Windows 2000 and Exchange 5.5 and I have a few Mac OS X users.
 What native OS X clients are out there for Exchange?  Using emulation
 Outlook:mac 2001 is crashing.  Any hopes of getting a native OS X client
 for
 Exchange?
 
 ---
 Ken Leyba
 Windows/Exchange System Administrator
 California State University Dominguez Hills
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: PGP Security Hole

2002-07-12 Thread Harty, Dave

I couldn't find the patch either, but eEye provided a link.

http://www.nai.com/naicommon/download/upgrade/patches/patch-pgphotfix.asp

 --
 From: Abercrombie, Sherry
 Reply To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 6:54 AM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  FYI:  PGP Security Hole
 
 In case yall haven't seen this, here's an article regarding a security
 hole in the PGP software package.  Incidentally, I haven't found the patch
 referenced in the article on their web-site, but I haven't searched real
 hard either.
 
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51728-2002Jul10.html 
 
 Sherry Abercrombie 
 Data Center Administration Team 
 Information Technology 
 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. 
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?

2001-08-21 Thread Harty, Dave

No plans here either.

 --
 From: Bob Peitzke
 Reply To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:36 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
 
 Folks,
 
 Thanks for the responses, but what I really want to know is not when the
 new
 plan goes into effect (though that was helpful), but what your shop's
 response is/will be.  Are you planning to buy the Upgrade Advantage for
 your
 BackOffice products?
 
 Bob Peitzke
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 8:23 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
 
 
 There is an exception to the rule (well maybe not an exception, but I
 can't
 think of the right word) and that is that the Backoffice CAL will no
 longer
 be available after October 1st and you will need to  get CAL 'Core' packs
 which I believe will be more expensive.  Backoffice CAL's were the
 cheapest
 way to get EX, SQL  NT Cals together.
 
 Simon
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2001 12:26 p.m.
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
  
  
  Of course I do
  http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO61803,00.html
  
  Regards,
   
  Sean Martin, MCSE
  Network Administrator
  Ribelin Lowell  Company
  Insurance Brokers, Inc.
  3111 C Street, Suite 300
  Anchorage, Alaska 99503
  Ph: (907) 561-1250
  Fax: (907) 561-4315
  Cell: (907) 229-0885
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:15 PM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
  
  
  Does someone have an URL confirming same?
  
  William
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:16 PM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
  
  
  That is what I heard from Microsoft.  End of Feb.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:13 PM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
  
  
  I was told by a CDW rep that it was pushed back to the end of 
  February,
  2002
   
  Regards,
   
  Sean Martin, MCSE
  Network Administrator
  Ribelin Lowell  Company
  Insurance Brokers, Inc.
  3111 C Street, Suite 300
  Anchorage, Alaska 99503
  Ph: (907) 561-1250
  Fax: (907) 561-4315
  Cell: (907) 229-0885
  Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Paul M. Puccinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:59 PM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
  
  
  Didn't MS back off and put that off until Feb 1?
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:03 PM
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
  Subject: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
  
  
  I'm curious about what approach other shops in the 60-120 
  user range are
  taking to Microsoft's new SW licensing plan that takes effect October
  1st.
   
  Is your shop buying Upgrade Advantages now on your 
  NT/Win2K/Exchange/SQL
  Server products?
   
  Bob Peitzke
  Information Systems Manager
  Sander A. Kessler  Associates
  Santa Monica, CA, USA
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the
  intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains 
  confidential and/or
  privileged information intended only for the addressee. If 
  you have received
  this communication in error, please call us immediately at 
  (907) 561-1250
  and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, 
  please e-mail the
  sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the
  communication in error.
  
  List Charter and FAQ at:
  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  
 
 ##
 ##
 #
 Notice of Confidential information 
 The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL
 INFORMATION and may
 be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named
 above. If you
 are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use,
 dissemination,
 distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you
 have received
 this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return
 or
 telephone
 call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 
 
 This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by