SMSMSE and CCR2007

2011-10-31 Thread Sirianni, Steven 
Hi all,
We have Exchange 2007 CCR SP3 RU5.
We also have Symantec Mail Security for MS Exchange 6.5.6 installed on our 
Mailbox and CAS/HUB server role servers.

Problem:
When SMSMSE runs Live Update daily, the CCR either fails over or cluster gets 
very angry.

Question:
Should we be running SMSMSE on Exchange Mailbox role?, Symantec says yes
Has anyone ever seen this?

Any comments appreciated.

Thanks,

Steve Sirianni
University of Buffalo
ssir...@buffalo.edu


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

How to stop users from purging items

2009-05-21 Thread Sirianni, Steven 
All,

Is there a setting to stop Outlook end users from deleting mail items from the 
dumpster? Right now we have our deleted item retention set to 30 days. If 
someone wanted to, they could go into their recover deleted items dumpster and 
purge items from it, we want to stop that.

PS. Exchange Server 2007 (outlook 2003-2007)

Thanks,

Steve Sirianni
University at Buffalo
ssir...@buffalo.edu


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

2008-01-15 Thread Sirianni, Steven 
Thanks all.

 

Steve Sirianni

Enterprise Infrastructure Services

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

716.645.6705



From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 6:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Yes, we use NetBackup and that works fine.

 

 

From: Sirianni, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Thanks for your response, its hard to get a hold of anyone using the
product. We may integrate Netbackup from Symantec with SF, are you guys
using Netbackup at all, or have looked at it?

Thanks again.

 

Steve Sirianni

Enterprise Infrastructure Services

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

716.645.6705



From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 5:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

It also increased my time for failover by an extra 60-90 seconds because
of the method it uses to bring disk resources offline and online, which
brings us dangerously close to exceeding the 5 minute "best practice"
watermark published by Microsoft.

 

Some combination of SFW, Command Central, PatchLink, and Configuration
Manager (yes, all Symantec products) is also causing one of our
clusters, the only cluster with SFW, to get ... peculiar ... on us with
performance issues.  With that, we are punting and have decided to
reinstall the cluster with our original HP drivers, and our other 4
clusters run the HP drivers without issue.

 

No, I don't think you'll get my recommendation for SFW.  But we are but
one customer and may not be representative of the rest of the customer
base.

 

 

From: Sirianni, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Do you recommend using SF at all since we are evaluating the product
now?

 

Steve Sirianni

Enterprise Infrastructure Services

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

716.645.6705



From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 6:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Having a hell of a time getting SFW's disk groups to play nice with
Trend ScanMail and Symantec's own(!) product Enterprise Vault.  Those
two won't install directly into disk groups.

 

 

From: Sirianni, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Hi,

Is anyone using Symantec's Storage Foundation for Exchange 2007 out
there? If so what have been your recent experiences?

Thanks in advance.

 

Steve Sirianni

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

2008-01-11 Thread Sirianni, Steven 
Thanks for your response, its hard to get a hold of anyone using the
product. We may integrate Netbackup from Symantec with SF, are you guys
using Netbackup at all, or have looked at it?

Thanks again.

 

Steve Sirianni

Enterprise Infrastructure Services

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

716.645.6705



From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 5:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

It also increased my time for failover by an extra 60-90 seconds because
of the method it uses to bring disk resources offline and online, which
brings us dangerously close to exceeding the 5 minute "best practice"
watermark published by Microsoft.

 

Some combination of SFW, Command Central, PatchLink, and Configuration
Manager (yes, all Symantec products) is also causing one of our
clusters, the only cluster with SFW, to get ... peculiar ... on us with
performance issues.  With that, we are punting and have decided to
reinstall the cluster with our original HP drivers, and our other 4
clusters run the HP drivers without issue.

 

No, I don't think you'll get my recommendation for SFW.  But we are but
one customer and may not be representative of the rest of the customer
base.

 

 

From: Sirianni, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 2:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Do you recommend using SF at all since we are evaluating the product
now?

 

Steve Sirianni

Enterprise Infrastructure Services

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

716.645.6705



From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 6:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Having a hell of a time getting SFW's disk groups to play nice with
Trend ScanMail and Symantec's own(!) product Enterprise Vault.  Those
two won't install directly into disk groups.

 

 

From: Sirianni, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Hi,

Is anyone using Symantec's Storage Foundation for Exchange 2007 out
there? If so what have been your recent experiences?

Thanks in advance.

 

Steve Sirianni

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

2008-01-08 Thread Sirianni, Steven 
Do you recommend using SF at all since we are evaluating the product
now?

 

Steve Sirianni

Enterprise Infrastructure Services

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

716.645.6705



From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 6:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Having a hell of a time getting SFW's disk groups to play nice with
Trend ScanMail and Symantec's own(!) product Enterprise Vault.  Those
two won't install directly into disk groups.

 

 

From: Sirianni, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Symantec Storage Foundation

 

 

Hi,

Is anyone using Symantec's Storage Foundation for Exchange 2007 out
there? If so what have been your recent experiences?

Thanks in advance.

 

Steve Sirianni

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Symantec Storage Foundation

2008-01-07 Thread Sirianni, Steven 
Hi,

Is anyone using Symantec's Storage Foundation for Exchange 2007 out
there? If so what have been your recent experiences?

Thanks in advance.

 

Steve Sirianni

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Backup Product E2K7

2008-01-02 Thread Sirianni, Steven 
Have you been running it in production and how successful has it been.

Thanks,

 

Steve Sirianni

Enterprise Infrastructure Services

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

716.645.6705



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Backup Product E2K7

 

 

DPM 2007 and other VSS-based products (including BackupExec and others)

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Sirianni, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Backup Product E2K7

 

 

Hello,

What are those who have deployed Exchange 2007 using for backups?

Thanks,

 

Steve Sirianni

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Backup Product E2K7

2008-01-02 Thread Sirianni, Steven 
Hello,

What are those who have deployed Exchange 2007 using for backups?

Thanks,

 

Steve Sirianni

University at Buffalo

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~