RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge
Title: Message We have been using the active/active cluster for about a year now and are going though a VERY controlled migration to Exchange from VMS so the Ex5.5 to E2K hurdles were not an issue. Most of the issues came from the front-end back-end setup and not the cluster setup. I think we jumped on the active/active bandwagon early via politics. We are currently running quad XEON 700's in the cluster and 2 dual 833's on the front end. We have around 730 people on E2K at present but the end result will be 15000 mailboxes. --kev -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct. Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K? J (CB) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge >>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. Only that the return seems to exceed the effort. Active/Passive is best for now. William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of exchangeI'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/activecluster. I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. We have7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers. Wenever have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at alltimes. What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv& pub,SMtp logs, etc...)I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to aCompaq MA6000 storageworks unit.We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.Any suggestion would be appreciated.Thanks,Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.htmlYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge
Title: Message Did you say it is up and running and is active/active? -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge Jamie, We have been running e2k for about an year right now. I just want to add these cluster to my exchange site. It is up and running but there are a couple of problems right now. Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct. Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K? J (CB) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge >>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. Only that the return seems to exceed the effort. Active/Passive is best for now. William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of exchangeI'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/activecluster. I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. We have7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers. Wenever have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at alltimes. What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv& pub,SMtp logs, etc...)I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to aCompaq MA6000 storageworks unit.We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.Any suggestion would be appreciated.Thanks,Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.htmlYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge
Title: Message None really. But then it's not Active/Active. Didn't skimp on hardware either. -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge What kind of problems have you experienced so far with your cluster? Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto: ]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge Yes. It's been an adventure since my arrival here. But yes. Dallas has 12 people migrated with 100 more this week to my first ever Exchange2000 cluster install. Oh, and we had to install another E2K box JUST to host the MSExchangeSRS. A cluster can not be the first server to join a 5.5 site. -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct. Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K? J (CB) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge >>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. Only that the return seems to exceed the effort. Active/Passive is best for now. William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of exchangeI'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/activecluster. I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. We have7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers. Wenever have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at alltimes. What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv& pub,SMtp logs, etc...)I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to aCompaq MA6000 storageworks unit.We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.Any suggestion would be appreciated.Thanks,Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.htmlYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge
Title: Message What kind of problems have you experienced so far with your cluster? Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto: ]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge Yes. It's been an adventure since my arrival here. But yes. Dallas has 12 people migrated with 100 more this week to my first ever Exchange2000 cluster install. Oh, and we had to install another E2K box JUST to host the MSExchangeSRS. A cluster can not be the first server to join a 5.5 site. -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct. Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K? J (CB) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge >>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. Only that the return seems to exceed the effort. Active/Passive is best for now. William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of exchangeI'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/activecluster. I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. We have7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers. Wenever have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at alltimes. What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv& pub,SMtp logs, etc...)I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to aCompaq MA6000 storageworks unit.We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.Any suggestion would be appreciated.Thanks,Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.htmlYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge
Title: Message Yes. It's been an adventure since my arrival here. But yes. Dallas has 12 people migrated with 100 more this week to my first ever Exchange2000 cluster install. Oh, and we had to install another E2K box JUST to host the MSExchangeSRS. A cluster can not be the first server to join a 5.5 site. -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct. Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K? J (CB) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge >>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. Only that the return seems to exceed the effort. Active/Passive is best for now. William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of exchangeI'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/activecluster. I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. We have7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers. Wenever have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at alltimes. What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv& pub,SMtp logs, etc...)I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to aCompaq MA6000 storageworks unit.We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.Any suggestion would be appreciated.Thanks,Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.htmlYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge
Title: Message Jamie, We have been running e2k for about an year right now. I just want to add these cluster to my exchange site. It is up and running but there are a couple of problems right now. Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct. Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K? J (CB) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge >>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. Only that the return seems to exceed the effort. Active/Passive is best for now. William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of exchangeI'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/activecluster. I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. We have7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers. Wenever have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at alltimes. What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv& pub,SMtp logs, etc...)I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to aCompaq MA6000 storageworks unit.We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.Any suggestion would be appreciated.Thanks,Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.htmlYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge
Title: Message You are, of course, correct. Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K? J (CB) -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge >>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. Only that the return seems to exceed the effort. Active/Passive is best for now. William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of exchangeI'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/activecluster. I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. We have7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers. Wenever have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at alltimes. What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv& pub,SMtp logs, etc...)I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to aCompaq MA6000 storageworks unit.We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.Any suggestion would be appreciated.Thanks,Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.htmlYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge
>>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. Only that the return seems to exceed the effort. Active/Passive is best for now. William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of exchangeI'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/activecluster. I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. We have7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers. Wenever have more than 1000 concurrent users attached to the system at alltimes. What files should be on the cluster drives (store - priv& pub,SMtp logs, etc...)I have two Quad 700 MHz 2 Meg Xenon with over 3gb RAM attached to aCompaq MA6000 storageworks unit.We are going to migrated the users using the mailbox move method.Any suggestion would be appreciated.Thanks,Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.htmlYour use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm