RE: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server?
Title: RE: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server? As far as I know you could use another Exchange 2000 standard installed and conected to the other one saving you the money of an Enterprise edition. Just installing as another server of the organization, but not creating any mailbox on it. Only to use OWA, configuring circular logging. I like to supose it must to solve your needs. BTW I agree about the cost involved in an Enterprise solution. Another solution could be publishing your internal OWA through a Proxy or ISA server. I haven't do it yet, but many tolds me it works fine. I haven't heard about the front-end license. I suggest you call direct to MS or an official dealer. Raul Batista -Mensaje original- De: Stefan Skogh (UVA International AB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: Jueves, 18 de Octubre de 2001 10:29 Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Asunto: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server? Does anyone have any comment to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server? OWA 5.5 was a free to use asp-application. The OWA 2000 demands that you install an Exchange 2000 Enterprize!!! server only to host the OWA. Standard edition won't do... We use Exchange standard edition internally and now we'll have to buy an exchange server enterprice license, only to use OWA externally... 3500 BUCKS! I think it's robbery! I'd accept an dedicated OWA (front end) server license if it existed, but not this. We are a quite small company, about a hundred users, maby 15 external (OWA) users. We need OWA, but just can't pay up for an extra license. /Stefan Stefan # We have now changed our domain name from uva.se to uva.com for web and e-mail. Our new adress on the web is www.uva.com and the new e-mailadresses is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old uva.se adresses will continue to work. # This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server?
Huh? Unless I'm missing something, we've got Std edition of 2000 and running OWA just fine. -Original Message- From: Stefan Skogh (UVA International AB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 14:46 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SV: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server? Can't use Standard edition! The OWA (front end) functionality comes with the enterprize version I guess I could open up the firewall to that server or use reverse proxying to access the server but I just don't like opening up unnessesary holes in the firewall... That's why we have a DMZ. There isn't any front end license, that's the problem... /Stefan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server?
Title: RE: Any comments to Microsofts "new" license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a "front end" server? Stefan, the solution I proposed is no installing a Front-end, just install a regular server and make use of only OWA and it's conectivity with other/s servers. Of course it requires another Exch2000 std license, but it it cheaper than an enterprise one. Good luck, Raul Batista -Mensaje original-De: Stefan Skogh (UVA International AB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Enviado el: Jueves, 18 de Octubre de 2001 10:46Para: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesAsunto: SV: Any comments to Microsofts "new" license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a "front end" server? Can't use Standard edition! The OWA (front end) functionality comes with the enterprize version I guess I could open up the firewall to that server or use "reverse proxying" to access the server butI just don't like opening up unnessesary holes in the firewall... That's why we have a DMZ. There isn't any front end license, that's the problem... /Stefan -Ursprungligt meddelande-Från: Raul Batista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Skickat: den 18 oktober 2001 15:39Till: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesÄmne: RE: Any comments to Microsofts "new" license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a "front end" server? As far as I know you could use another Exchange 2000 standard installed and conected to the other one saving you the money of an Enterprise edition. Just installing as another server of the organization, but not creating any mailbox on it. Only to use OWA, configuring circular logging. I like to supose it must to solve your needs. BTW I agree about the cost involved in an Enterprise solution. Another solution could be "publishing" your internal OWA through a Proxy or ISA server. I haven't do it yet, but many tolds me it works fine. I haven't heard about the front-end license. I suggest you call direct to MS or an official dealer. Raul Batista -Mensaje original- De: Stefan Skogh (UVA International AB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: Jueves, 18 de Octubre de 2001 10:29 Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Asunto: Any comments to Microsofts "new" license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a "front end" server? Does anyone have any comment to Microsofts "new" license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a "front end" server? OWA 5.5 was a free to use asp-application. The OWA 2000 demands that you install an Exchange 2000 Enterprize!!! server only to host the OWA. Standard edition won't do... We use Exchange standard edition internally and now we'll have to buy an exchange server enterprice license, only to use OWA externally... 3500 BUCKS! I think it's robbery! I'd accept an dedicated OWA (front end) server license if it existed, but not this. We are a quite small company, about a hundred users, maby 15 external (OWA) users. We need OWA, but just can't pay up for an extra license. /Stefan Stefan # We have now changed our domain name from uva.se to uva.com for web and e-mail. Our new adress on the web is www.uva.com and the new e-mailadresses is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old uva.se adresses will continue to work. # This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm#We have now changed our domain name from uva.se to uva.com for web and e-mail. Our new adress on the web is www.uva.com andthe new e-mailadresses is [EMAIL PROTECTED]The old uva.se adresses will continue to work.#This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server?
Hmmm... Are you running it in a Front-end/Back-end (FE/BE) architecture? If so, you have to tell me how you did it... Of course, you can run E2K and OWA without a FE/BE architecture, but if you want to do so, you need E2K Enterprise Ed.. No? Eric -Message d'origine- De : Markus Lindemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : 18 octobre, 2001 09:45 À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues Objet : RE: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server? Huh? Unless I'm missing something, we've got Std edition of 2000 and running OWA just fine. -Original Message- From: Stefan Skogh (UVA International AB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 14:46 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SV: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server? Can't use Standard edition! The OWA (front end) functionality comes with the enterprize version I guess I could open up the firewall to that server or use reverse proxying to access the server but I just don't like opening up unnessesary holes in the firewall... That's why we have a DMZ. There isn't any front end license, that's the problem... /Stefan List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server?
Nope. Just plain Standard out of the box. If I remember correctly it just dumped the relevant files into the various fodlders and then set up IIS and it's virtual HTTP server. Have you got IIS installed there? Bit strange as I did nothing out of the ordinary here. -Original Message- From: Eric Mailloux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Any comments to Microsofts new license for Exchange 2000 regarding the OWA as a front end server? Hmmm... Are you running it in a Front-end/Back-end (FE/BE) architecture? If so, you have to tell me how you did it... Of course, you can run E2K and OWA without a FE/BE architecture, but if you want to do so, you need E2K Enterprise Ed.. No? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
