RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-25 Thread Ben Ong

What I did before was, I'll transfer their mail to their personal folder,
than use eseutil.exe to defrag.

-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 January 2002 03:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

We have another drive we have added for the defrag and we need to defrag the
database because there is only 300mb of free space on the database drive and
to expand the disk, we need to move the database of the disk and expand them
move it back.

 -Original Message-
From:   Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation.

Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an
expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new
database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new file,
which can take a long time. On average, it takes about one hour to
defragment 5 to 10 GB of disk space. Also, you need enough free space for
the offline defragmentation process to hold the new file. As a general rule,
you should have 100 percent more free space than the amount you are
defragmenting.

So the question then begs whether you have the free space to even
perform the defrag.  May I also ask why you feel that it is so completely
necessary to defragment your database?  Is there a problem with the server?
Is it not running smoothly?  Are you anticipating that it will never grow
larger?  Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is reclaiming the white
space.  That is it.  White space simply explained is just space in the
database that is not currently being used, but will be used as the database
grows.  Since the space has already been reserved, your server does not have
to work nearly as hard to procure more space and increase the size of the
database.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

We have an on going problem in our company,  our Exchange database exceed
60gb on some of our servers.  One of these databases has 13gb of free space
in it.  We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed
to complete in the time window every time. 

Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange
5.5?
Has anyone ever done this before?
Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our
database?
What would you recommend?

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Re: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-25 Thread Rastislav Maniak


I have another experience with fragmentation. After half a year of running
E2k (before that we used sendmail) with mostly POP3 clients, our database
reached 35 GB. I never run offline gefrag at that time, but every week
online defrag was done. Because we had another problem, all the mailboxes
were moved to the different server. Now is database size 4 GB  Is this
O.K.?

Rastislav Maniak
Exchange admin
ICT Prague

  -Original Message-
 From:   Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent:   Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

 Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline
defragmentation.

 Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is
an
 expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new
 database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new
file,
 which can take a long time. On average, it takes about one hour to
 defragment 5 to 10 GB of disk space. Also, you need enough free space for
 the offline defragmentation process to hold the new file. As a general
rule,
 you should have 100 percent more free space than the amount you are
 defragmenting.

 So the question then begs whether you have the free space to even
 perform the defrag.  May I also ask why you feel that it is so completely
 necessary to defragment your database?  Is there a problem with the
server?
 Is it not running smoothly?  Are you anticipating that it will never grow
 larger?  Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is reclaiming the white
 space.  That is it.  White space simply explained is just space in the
 database that is not currently being used, but will be used as the
database
 grows.  Since the space has already been reserved, your server does not
have
 to work nearly as hard to procure more space and increase the size of the
 database.

 Ben Winzenz, MCSE
 Network/Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-25 Thread Don Ely - Verizon

That's a rather ignorant solution...

D

-Original Message-
From: Ben Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs


What I did before was, I'll transfer their mail to their personal
folder, than use eseutil.exe to defrag.

-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 January 2002 03:31
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

We have another drive we have added for the defrag and we need to defrag
the database because there is only 300mb of free space on the database
drive and to expand the disk, we need to move the database of the disk
and expand them move it back.

 -Original Message-
From:   Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline
defragmentation.

Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is
an expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a
new database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the
new file, which can take a long time. On average, it takes about one
hour to defragment 5 to 10 GB of disk space. Also, you need enough free
space for the offline defragmentation process to hold the new file. As a
general rule, you should have 100 percent more free space than the
amount you are defragmenting.

So the question then begs whether you have the free space to
even perform the defrag.  May I also ask why you feel that it is so
completely necessary to defragment your database?  Is there a problem
with the server? Is it not running smoothly?  Are you anticipating that
it will never grow larger?  Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is
reclaiming the white space.  That is it.  White space simply explained
is just space in the database that is not currently being used, but will
be used as the database grows.  Since the space has already been
reserved, your server does not have to work nearly as hard to procure
more space and increase the size of the database.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

We have an on going problem in our company,  our Exchange database
exceed 60gb on some of our servers.  One of these databases has 13gb of
free space in it.  We have tried to defrag this database multiple times
and have failed to complete in the time window every time. 

Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for
Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third
party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you
recommend?

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-24 Thread Ely, Don

Judging by your 60GB DB, you need at least twice that in disk space to run
ESEUTIL.  That means, to run ESEUTIL at all, you need at least 120GB and I
would say a little more to be safe for it to run.

D

-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs


We have an on going problem in our company,  our Exchange database exceed
60gb on some of our servers.  One of these databases has 13gb of free space
in it.  We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed
to complete in the time window every time.  

Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange
5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools
that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend?

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-24 Thread Benjamin Winzenz

Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation.

Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an
expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new
database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new file,
which can take a long time. On average, it takes about one hour to
defragment 5 to 10 GB of disk space. Also, you need enough free space for
the offline defragmentation process to hold the new file. As a general rule,
you should have 100 percent more free space than the amount you are
defragmenting.

So the question then begs whether you have the free space to even
perform the defrag.  May I also ask why you feel that it is so completely
necessary to defragment your database?  Is there a problem with the server?
Is it not running smoothly?  Are you anticipating that it will never grow
larger?  Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is reclaiming the white
space.  That is it.  White space simply explained is just space in the
database that is not currently being used, but will be used as the database
grows.  Since the space has already been reserved, your server does not have
to work nearly as hard to procure more space and increase the size of the
database.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

We have an on going problem in our company,  our Exchange database exceed
60gb on some of our servers.  One of these databases has 13gb of free space
in it.  We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed
to complete in the time window every time.  

Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange
5.5?
Has anyone ever done this before?
Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our
database?
What would you recommend?

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-24 Thread James Chris L

We have another drive we have added for the defrag and we need to defrag the
database because there is only 300mb of free space on the database drive and
to expand the disk, we need to move the database of the disk and expand them
move it back. 

 -Original Message-
From:   Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation.

Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an
expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new
database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new file,
which can take a long time. On average, it takes about one hour to
defragment 5 to 10 GB of disk space. Also, you need enough free space for
the offline defragmentation process to hold the new file. As a general rule,
you should have 100 percent more free space than the amount you are
defragmenting.

So the question then begs whether you have the free space to even
perform the defrag.  May I also ask why you feel that it is so completely
necessary to defragment your database?  Is there a problem with the server?
Is it not running smoothly?  Are you anticipating that it will never grow
larger?  Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is reclaiming the white
space.  That is it.  White space simply explained is just space in the
database that is not currently being used, but will be used as the database
grows.  Since the space has already been reserved, your server does not have
to work nearly as hard to procure more space and increase the size of the
database.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

We have an on going problem in our company,  our Exchange database exceed
60gb on some of our servers.  One of these databases has 13gb of free space
in it.  We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed
to complete in the time window every time.  

Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange
5.5?
Has anyone ever done this before?
Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our
database?
What would you recommend?

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-24 Thread Benjamin Winzenz

You still didn't mention whether the drive you added has at least 60gb of
free space.  Assuming it does, what is stopping you from simply running the
Performance optimizer to move the databases off the current drive, then
expand the drive, then move them back by running Optimizer again?  You do
realize that running the defrag will likely take 12+ hours just by itself,
during which time your server will be offline?

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

We have another drive we have added for the defrag and we need to defrag the
database because there is only 300mb of free space on the database drive and
to expand the disk, we need to move the database of the disk and expand them
move it back. 

 -Original Message-
From:   Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation.

Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an
expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new
database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new file,
which can take a long time. On average, it takes about one hour to
defragment 5 to 10 GB of disk space. Also, you need enough free space for
the offline defragmentation process to hold the new file. As a general rule,
you should have 100 percent more free space than the amount you are
defragmenting.

So the question then begs whether you have the free space to even
perform the defrag.  May I also ask why you feel that it is so completely
necessary to defragment your database?  Is there a problem with the server?
Is it not running smoothly?  Are you anticipating that it will never grow
larger?  Basically, all you are doing with eseutil is reclaiming the white
space.  That is it.  White space simply explained is just space in the
database that is not currently being used, but will be used as the database
grows.  Since the space has already been reserved, your server does not have
to work nearly as hard to procure more space and increase the size of the
database.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

We have an on going problem in our company,  our Exchange database exceed
60gb on some of our servers.  One of these databases has 13gb of free space
in it.  We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed
to complete in the time window every time.  

Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange
5.5?
Has anyone ever done this before?
Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our
database?
What would you recommend?

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-24 Thread Kopec, David

Please explain, time window?

-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs


We have an on going problem in our company,  our Exchange database exceed
60gb on some of our servers.  One of these databases has 13gb of free space
in it.  We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed
to complete in the time window every time.  

Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange
5.5?
Has anyone ever done this before?
Is there any other third party tools that can be used to defrag our
database?
What would you recommend?

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-24 Thread Woodrick, Ed

How long is your time window?

Dependent on the I/O capabilities of your system, it could take a few
days to compress a 60GB store. You can roughly judge the speed by
looking at the size of the temp DB during the process. It will slowly
grow to about 47GB before it completes.

60GB isn't something to toy with. At absolute fastest transfer speeds, a
60GB file would take about 2 hours to transfer across a 100MB network
link. Your internal I/O might be a little faster, but not by a whole
lot. 

And by the way, your database should be defragmented every evening. Two
runs for each database. What you are attempting to do is to compress the
database by creating a copy with no whitespace in it.

Ed Woodrick

-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
Posted To: Exchange Sunbelt
Conversation: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs


We have an on going problem in our company,  our Exchange database
exceed 60gb on some of our servers.  One of these databases has 13gb of
free space in it.  We have tried to defrag this database multiple times
and have failed to complete in the time window every time.  

Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for
Exchange 5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third
party tools that can be used to defrag our database? What would you
recommend?

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs

2002-01-24 Thread Martin Blackstone

How long management will allow the server to be unavailable before they
freak out.

-Original Message-
From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs


Please explain, time window?

-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs


We have an on going problem in our company,  our Exchange database exceed
60gb on some of our servers.  One of these databases has 13gb of free space
in it.  We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed
to complete in the time window every time.  

Does anyone know what if any the limitations of the ESEUTIL are for Exchange
5.5? Has anyone ever done this before? Is there any other third party tools
that can be used to defrag our database? What would you recommend?

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm