RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-09-26 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Ed Crowley Server Move Method



I 
would avoid the use of recipient containers in Exchange 5.5 because though 
well-intended, they limit you're maneouverability later as mailboxes do not 
easily move from container to container.  Address Book Views can assist in 
creating virtual containers.
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 10:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Ed 
Crowley Server Move Method
Hey Folks 
The errors on my current exchange server and the fact that the 
previous guy set it up as a bdc and other things running on it has prompted me 
to move it to a new better stronger faster box only running exchange.  I am 
going to utilize the Ed Crowley method but I had a question I was hoping someone 
could answer.
Is it possible to move users to the new server and place them in 
recipient containers? 
TIA 
Jim 
There was a power outage at a department store yesterday. Twenty 
people were trapped on the escalators. -- Steven Wright List Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-09-26 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
Title: Ed Crowley Server Move Method



Sure, 
unless of course you don't like them.  In which case, the recycle bin 
.
 
mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
regards 
Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
  2001 1:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Ed 
  Crowley Server Move Method
  Hey Folks 
  The errors on my current exchange server and the fact that the 
  previous guy set it up as a bdc and other things running on it has prompted me 
  to move it to a new better stronger faster box only running exchange.  I 
  am going to utilize the Ed Crowley method but I had a question I was hoping 
  someone could answer.
  Is it possible to move users to the new server and place them 
  in recipient containers? 
  TIA 
  Jim 
  There was a power outage at a department store yesterday. 
  Twenty people were trapped on the escalators. -- Steven Wright List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-09-26 Thread Zangara, Jim
Title: Message



definitely a 
few I would like to put in there!
 
 
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

I play the harmonica. The 
only way I can play is if I get my car going really fast, and stick it out the 
window. -- Steven Wright 

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
  NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:42 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ed Crowley Server Move 
  Method
  Sure, unless of course you don't like them.  In which case, the 
  recycle bin .
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen / best 
  regards 
  Steve Ropiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] office (207) 
  989-9115 cell (513) 314-0197 
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 
2001 1:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Ed 
Crowley Server Move Method
Hey Folks 
The errors on my current exchange server and the fact that 
the previous guy set it up as a bdc and other things running on it has 
prompted me to move it to a new better stronger faster box only running 
exchange.  I am going to utilize the Ed Crowley method but I had a 
question I was hoping someone could answer.
Is it possible to move users to the new server and place 
them in recipient containers? 
TIA 
Jim 
There was a power outage at a department store yesterday. 
Twenty people were trapped on the escalators. -- Steven Wright 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-10-19 Thread David N. Precht

if win2k is the OS, SP the Exchange server and OS to the latest ... and read
up on the white papers 

-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ed Crowley Server Move Method


Hi

I am currently running Exch 5.5 sp4 on a NT 4.0 sp6a + Hot fixes. This
machine was the 1st NT machine in the company and was originally configured
as a PDC. Exch 5 was then installed on this box (before my time) and has
since been upgraded to 5.5. Since then I have added other NT 4 servers
several of which are Domain Controllers and one has been promoted to the PDC
and the Exch box now functions as a BDC.

I am installing HP LH 3000 that I want to migrate my Exch 5.5 to (not
anywhere ready for E2k) both for performance issues and getting Exch 5.5 off
a Domain Controller. I was going to install NT 4 on the HP but now think
that putting W2K may be the better choice. However, it will be the only W2k
server in the environment, no AD and a member server of the NT4 Domain.

After the server is up running in the Domain, I would then install the Ex
5.5 and Sp4 and follow the "E.C." server move method.

Are there any pitfalls in my plan that I am not recognizing ?

If I do take this path of migration am I creating any added problems/issues
down the road when we want to upgrade to E2K ?

Thanks

-Dave Vantine





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-10-19 Thread Robin Lawrie

You just need to make sure that you install all the service packs for
Exchange 5.5 if your going to install it on a Win2k server. AD is not
needed. When you run setup from the Exchange 5.5 cd, you will get an
error message basically saying that the setup program won't
run/shouldn't be run on the server but just ignore this and continue
with the installation. Then install SP4 and away you go

-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 13:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ed Crowley Server Move Method


Hi

I am currently running Exch 5.5 sp4 on a NT 4.0 sp6a + Hot fixes. This
machine was the 1st NT machine in the company and was originally
configured
as a PDC. Exch 5 was then installed on this box (before my time) and has
since been upgraded to 5.5. Since then I have added other NT 4 servers
several of which are Domain Controllers and one has been promoted to the
PDC
and the Exch box now functions as a BDC.

I am installing HP LH 3000 that I want to migrate my Exch 5.5 to (not
anywhere ready for E2k) both for performance issues and getting Exch 5.5
off
a Domain Controller. I was going to install NT 4 on the HP but now think
that putting W2K may be the better choice. However, it will be the only
W2k
server in the environment, no AD and a member server of the NT4 Domain.

After the server is up running in the Domain, I would then install the
Ex
5.5 and Sp4 and follow the "E.C." server move method.

Are there any pitfalls in my plan that I am not recognizing ?

If I do take this path of migration am I creating any added
problems/issues
down the road when we want to upgrade to E2K ?

Thanks

-Dave Vantine





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-10-19 Thread Martin Blackstone

Running Exch55 on W2K is great. Much more stable in my opinion. And
having a W2K server in an NT4 domain is no issue at all.
There is/was a whitepaper on the MS site regarding installing Exch55 on
W2K server. 

The one thing to remember is that if you choose to run OWA  on the Exch
server, you will need to make sure you don't let SMTP be installed along
with IIS during the W2K install process.

Other than that, once you SP Exch up to SP4, you will be fine.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ed Crowley Server Move Method


Hi

I am currently running Exch 5.5 sp4 on a NT 4.0 sp6a + Hot fixes. This
machine was the 1st NT machine in the company and was originally
configured as a PDC. Exch 5 was then installed on this box (before my
time) and has since been upgraded to 5.5. Since then I have added other
NT 4 servers several of which are Domain Controllers and one has been
promoted to the PDC and the Exch box now functions as a BDC.

I am installing HP LH 3000 that I want to migrate my Exch 5.5 to (not
anywhere ready for E2k) both for performance issues and getting Exch 5.5
off a Domain Controller. I was going to install NT 4 on the HP but now
think that putting W2K may be the better choice. However, it will be the
only W2k server in the environment, no AD and a member server of the NT4
Domain.

After the server is up running in the Domain, I would then install the
Ex 5.5 and Sp4 and follow the "E.C." server move method.

Are there any pitfalls in my plan that I am not recognizing ?

If I do take this path of migration am I creating any added
problems/issues down the road when we want to upgrade to E2K ?

Thanks

-Dave Vantine





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-10-19 Thread Rick . Contier

One other thing that may be of note,  If you are running 5.5 enterprise
edition and need to install OWA you will need to rename the exe to setup.exe
from srvmin.exe or srvmax.exe.  Otherwise it will not let you install OWA on
Win2K.  Straight from MS's mouth.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method


Running Exch55 on W2K is great. Much more stable in my opinion. And
having a W2K server in an NT4 domain is no issue at all.
There is/was a whitepaper on the MS site regarding installing Exch55 on
W2K server. 

The one thing to remember is that if you choose to run OWA  on the Exch
server, you will need to make sure you don't let SMTP be installed along
with IIS during the W2K install process.

Other than that, once you SP Exch up to SP4, you will be fine.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ed Crowley Server Move Method


Hi

I am currently running Exch 5.5 sp4 on a NT 4.0 sp6a + Hot fixes. This
machine was the 1st NT machine in the company and was originally
configured as a PDC. Exch 5 was then installed on this box (before my
time) and has since been upgraded to 5.5. Since then I have added other
NT 4 servers several of which are Domain Controllers and one has been
promoted to the PDC and the Exch box now functions as a BDC.

I am installing HP LH 3000 that I want to migrate my Exch 5.5 to (not
anywhere ready for E2k) both for performance issues and getting Exch 5.5
off a Domain Controller. I was going to install NT 4 on the HP but now
think that putting W2K may be the better choice. However, it will be the
only W2k server in the environment, no AD and a member server of the NT4
Domain.

After the server is up running in the Domain, I would then install the
Ex 5.5 and Sp4 and follow the "E.C." server move method.

Are there any pitfalls in my plan that I am not recognizing ?

If I do take this path of migration am I creating any added
problems/issues down the road when we want to upgrade to E2K ?

Thanks

-Dave Vantine





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
+++The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this
document.+++

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method

2001-10-19 Thread Dave Vantine

Thanks to all who replied.

I did download the 5.5 to W2k Migration White paper as someone suggested and
will use as a guide.

My current Exch55 is running OWA on the same machine but my plan is not to
put OWA on the new Exch Server. I plan to install IIS on another server then
install OWA on that machine and point it to the new (moved) Exchange server.

Again Thanks 
-Dave Vantine

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ed Crowley Server Move Method


Running Exch55 on W2K is great. Much more stable in my opinion. And
having a W2K server in an NT4 domain is no issue at all.
There is/was a whitepaper on the MS site regarding installing Exch55 on
W2K server. 

The one thing to remember is that if you choose to run OWA  on the Exch
server, you will need to make sure you don't let SMTP be installed along
with IIS during the W2K install process.

Other than that, once you SP Exch up to SP4, you will be fine.

-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ed Crowley Server Move Method


Hi

I am currently running Exch 5.5 sp4 on a NT 4.0 sp6a + Hot fixes. This
machine was the 1st NT machine in the company and was originally
configured as a PDC. Exch 5 was then installed on this box (before my
time) and has since been upgraded to 5.5. Since then I have added other
NT 4 servers several of which are Domain Controllers and one has been
promoted to the PDC and the Exch box now functions as a BDC.

I am installing HP LH 3000 that I want to migrate my Exch 5.5 to (not
anywhere ready for E2k) both for performance issues and getting Exch 5.5
off a Domain Controller. I was going to install NT 4 on the HP but now
think that putting W2K may be the better choice. However, it will be the
only W2k server in the environment, no AD and a member server of the NT4
Domain.

After the server is up running in the Domain, I would then install the
Ex 5.5 and Sp4 and follow the "E.C." server move method.

Are there any pitfalls in my plan that I am not recognizing ?

If I do take this path of migration am I creating any added
problems/issues down the road when we want to upgrade to E2K ?

Thanks

-Dave Vantine





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm